Hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo

Một phần của tài liệu (LUẬN văn THẠC sĩ) nghiên cứu mối tương quan giữa cạnh tranh và ổn định của các ngân hàng thương mại tại 10 quốc gia đông nam á giai đoạn 2011 2018 (Trang 68 - 90)

CHƯƠNG 5 : KẾT LUẬN

5.4 Hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo

Từ các hạn chế của luận văn, tác giả đưa ra một số hướng nghiên cứu tiếp theo của đề tài này. Đầu tiên, mở rộng mẫu dữ liệu bao gồm thêm các ngân hàng hồi giáo (Islamic bank). Các ngân hàng hồi giáo phải tuân thủ luật pháp và thơng lệ hồi giáo đó là cấm các giao dịch lãi và giao dịch phái sinh. Đây là khác biệt lớn so với các ngân hàng thương mại thông thường trong mẫu nghiên cứu. Bên cạnh việc mở rộng mẫu dữ liệu, tác giả sử dụng các phương pháp khác nhau để lượng hóa ổn định ngân hàng và mức độ cạnh tranh để nâng cao độ tin cậy của đề tài.

Hướng phát triển của đề tài có thể khai thác ở khía cạnh kiểm tra mối quan hệ phi tuyến giữa cạnh tranh và ổn định. Kết quả nghiên cứu sẽ đóng góp nhiều cho cơng tác của các nhà quản lý chính sách để điều chỉnh mức độ cạnh tranh phù hợp đảm bảo duy trì ổn định ngân hàng, ổn định hệ thống tài chính.

Tóm lại, hướng nghiên cứu phát triển như đề xuất có thể mở rộng và khắc phục những hạn chế còn tồn tại của đề tài. Trong tương lai, tác giả sẽ mở rộng và kết hợp xem xét tác động các yếu tố khác lên mối tương quan giữa cạnh tranh và ổn định trong lĩnh vực ngân hàng. Bên cạnh đó, tập trung nghiên cứu sâu hơn vào thị trường Việt Nam để nâng giá trị đóng góp thực tiễn của đề tài.

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO

TÀI LIỆU NƯỚC NGOÀI

1. Allen, F., Gale, D., 2004. Competition and Financial Stability. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36, 433-480.

2. Altman, Edward, 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 589-609.

3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of

Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51. 5. A. Lerner., 1934. The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of

Monopoly Power”. The Review of Economic Studies (1934), pp. 157–75. 6. Bain, J. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge: Harvard Press. 7. Barth, J.R., Caprio, G., Levine, R., 2004. Bank regulation and supervision:

whatworks best? Journal Financial Intermediation 13, 205–248.

8. Barth, J.R., Caprio, G., Levine, R., 2013. Bank regulation and supervision in 180 countries form 1999-2011. NBER Working Paper No. 18733.

http://www.nber.org/papers/w18733.

9. Beck, T. 2008. Bank Competition and Financial Stability: Friends or Foes?

World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4656.

10. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 2006. Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. Journal of Banking and Finance 30,

1581-1603.

11. Beck, T., Demirgỹỗ-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 2006b. Bank Concentration and Fragility: Impactand Mechanics. In: Stulz, R., and Carey, M. (eds), The Risks of Financial Institutions, National Bureau of Economic Research.

12. Beck, T., De Jonghe, O., Schepens, G., 2013. Bank competition and stability: Cross-country heterogeneity. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22, 218-

244.

13. Beck, T., Demirgỹỗ-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., 2004. Bank competition and access to finance: International evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 627-648.

14. Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., & Turk-Ariss, R. (2009). Bank Competition and Financial Stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 35(2), 99–118. 15. Berger, A.N., Udell, G., 2004. The institutional memory hypothesis and the

procyclicality of bank lending behaviour. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 458-495.

16. Bikker, J. and Haaf, K. (2002). Measures of competition and concentration in the banking industry: a review of the literature. Economic & Financial Modelling, 9(2) :53-98.

17. Boone, J., van Ours, J. C., and van der Wiel, H. (2007). How (not) to measure competition.

18. Boyd, J. H., De Nicolò, G., and Jalal, A. M., 2006. Bank risk-taking and competition revisited: New theory and new evidence. IMF working paper. 19. Boyd, J.H. and De Nicolo, G., 2005. The theory of bank risk taking and

competition revisited. The Journal of Finance 60(3), 1329-1343.

20. Boyd, J.H., Graham, S.L.,1986. Risk, Regulation and Bank holding Company Expansion into nonbanking. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Quarterly Review Spring 1986:3-4.

21. Boone, J. (2008). A new way to measure competition. The Economic Journal, 118(531) :1245-1261.

22. Caminal, R., Matutes, C., 2002. Market power and bank failures. International

Journal of Industrial Organisation, 20, 1341-1361.

23. Carletti, E., Hartmann, P., 2002. Competition and Stability: What is Special About Banking? European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, 146.

24. Carletti, E., Vives, X., 2008. Regulation and competition policy in the banking sector. Occasional Paper 159, IESE, Public-Private Sector Research Center. 25. Cetorelli, N. (1999). Competitive analysis in banking: appraisal of the

methodologies. Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank Of Chicago, 23 :2-15.

26. Christine V. Zavgren, (1985). Assessing the vulnerability to failure of american industrial firms: a logistic analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 12(1).

27. Christopher F. Baum, Mark E. Schaffer, Steven Stillman., 2003. Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing. The Stata Journal,

https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300101.

28. Claessens, S. and Laeven, L., 2004. What drives bank competition? Some international evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3), 563-583. 29. Claessens, S., Klingebiel, D., 2001. Competition and scope of activities in

financial services. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 19-40.

30. Clark, J.M,1940. Toward a Concept of Workable Competition. American Economic Review 30:241-256.

31. Demirgỹỗ-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H., 2010. Bank activity and funding strategies: The impact on risk and returns. Journal of Financial Economics

98(3), 626-650.

32. Delis, M. D. (2012). Bank competition, financial reform, and institutions: The importance of being developed. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2)

:450-465.

33. Dell’Ariccia, G., Marquez, R., 2006. Lending booms and lending standards.

Journal of Finance, 61, 2511-2546.

34. Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry and public policy.

Journal of Law and Economics, 16 :1-10.

35. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 2002. The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1-37.

36. Ephraim Clark, Nemanja Radic, Alma Sharipova, 2018. Bank competition and stability in the CIS markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Volume 54, May 2018, Pages 190-203.

37. Edward S. Mason, 1958. Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem.

Science and Society 22 (4):365-368 (1958).

38. Foos, D., Norden, L., Weber, M., 2010. Loan growth and riskiness of banks.

Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(12), 2929-2940.

39. Fu, M., Lin, R., & Molyneux, P. (2012). Bank Competition and Financial Stability in Asia Pacific. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2136819. 40. Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective.

Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

41. Grice, J. S., & Ingram, R. W. (2001). Tests of the generalizability of Altman’s bankruptcy prediction model. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 53–

61. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00126-0.

42. Hannan, T. H., & Hanweck, G. A. (1988). Bank Insolvency Risk and the Market for Large Certificates of Deposit. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 20(2), 203. doi:10.2307/1992111.

43. Hansen, L., 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054.

44. Hien Thu Phan, Sajid Anward, W. Robert J. Alexander, Hanh Thi My Phan 2019. Competition, efficiency and stability: An empirical study of East Asian commercial banks. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance,

Volume 50, November 2019, 100990.

45. Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5) :761-762.

46. Iwata, G. (1974). Measurement of conjectural variations in oligopoly. Journal

47. Jimenez, G., Lopez, J.A., Saurina, J., 2007. How Does Competition Impact Bank Risk-Taking? Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series, p.23.

48. John, K., John, T.A., Saunders, A., 1994. Universal banking and firm risk taking. Journal of Banking Finance, 18, 307-323.

49. Keeley, M.C., 1990. Deposit insurance, risk and market power in banking. American. Economic Review, 80, 1183-1200.

50. Khan, H. H., Kutan, A. M., Ahmad, R. B., & Gee, C. S. (2017). Does higher bank concentration reduce the level of competition in the banking industry? Further evidence from South East Asian economies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 52, 91–106.

51. Koo, Richard C. (2008). Lessons from Japan’s Loss Decade. The International

Economy; Washington Vol.22, Iss.4, (Fall 2008):69-73.

52. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 2002. Government ownership of commercial banks. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265-301.

53. Levy Yeyati, E., Micco, A., 2007. Concentration and foreign penetration in Latin American banking sectors: impact on competition and risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 1633-47.

54. Liu, H., Molyneux, P., and Wilson, J. O., 2013. Competition and stability in European banking: a regional analysis. The Manchester School, 81(2), 176-

201.

55. Luis Otero Gonz´alez, Alaa Razia, Milagros Vivel Búa, Rubén Lado Sestayo., 2017. Competition, concentration and risk taking in banking sector of MENA countries? Research in International Business and Finance, Volume 42, December 2017, Pages 591-604.

56. Martinez-Miera, D., Repullo, R., 2010. Does competition reduce the risk of bank failure? Review of Financial Studies, 23, 3638-3664.

57. Mason, E. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. The

58. Michael E.Porter, 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nation . Harvard Business Review.

59. Minsky, Hyman P., (1982). The Financial-Instability Hypothesis: Capitalist Processes and the Behavior of the Economy. Hyman P. Minsky Archive. Paper 282. http://digitalcommons.bard.edu/hm_archive/282.

60. Mishkin, F. S., 1999. Financial consolidation: Dangers and opportunities.

Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, 675-691.

61. Mohammed Amidu, Simon Wolfe, 2013. Does bank competition and diversification lead to greater stability? Evidence from emerging markets?

Review of Development Finance, Volume 3, Issue 3, July-September 2013,

Pages 152-166.

62. Noman, A. H. M., Gee, C. S., & Isa, C. R. (2018). Does bank regulation matter on the relationship between competition and financial stability? Evidence from Southeast Asian countries. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 48, 144–161. 63. O’Hara, M., Shaw, W., 1990. Deposit insurance and wealth effects: The benefit

of being too big to fail. Journal of Finance, 45, 1587-1600.

64. Otero, L., Rodríguez, L., Martorell, O. y Merigó, J., 2016: The effect of financial innovation on European banks’ risk. Journal of Business Research,

69, 4781-4786.

65. Panzar, J. and Rosse, J. (1982). Structure, conduct and comparative statistics.

Bell Labotaries Economic Discussion Paper.

66. Panzar, J. and Rosse, J. (1987). Testing for" monopoly" equilibrium. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XXXV (4) :443-456.

67. Roodman, D., 2009. How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to "Difference" and "System" GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.

68. Rosse, J. N. and Panzar, J. C. (1977). Chamberlin vs. Robinson: an empirical test for monopoly rents. Bell Laboratories Economic Discussion Paper.

69. Saunders, A., 1985. Conflicts of interest: an economic view. In: Walter, I. (Ed.), Deregulating Wall Street: Commercial Bank Penetration of the Corporate

Securities Market. Wiley, New York, pp. 207-230.

70. Schaeck, K., Cihak, M., 2007. Banking competition and capital ratios. IMF Working Paper. No.07/216.

71. Schaeck, K., Cihak, M., 2008. How does competition affect efficiency and soundness in banking? New empirical evidence. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No 932.

72. Schaeck, K., Cihak, M., 2014. Competition, Efficiency, and Stability in Banking. Financial Management, 43(1), 215-241.

73. Shaffer, S. (2001). Banking conduct before the european single banking licence: A crosscountry comparison. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12 :79-104.

74. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1998. The grabbing hand: government pathologies and their cures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

75. Smith, Adam. (1776). The wealth of nations. In Harvard Classics. volume 10, edited by C. J. Bullock. New York: P. F Collier.

76. Stigler, G. J. (1957). Perfect competition, historically contemplated. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(1) :1-17.

77. Tabak, B. M., Fazio, D. M., and Cajueiro, D. O. (2012). The relationship between banking market competition and risk-taking: Do size and capitalization matter? Journal of Banking & Finance.

78. Turk Ariss, R. (2010). On the implications of market power in banking: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(4)

:765-775.

79. Uhde, A., Heimeshoff, U., 2009. Consolidation in banking and financial sta- bility in Europe: empirical evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 33,1299– 1311.

80. Van Leuvensteijn, M., Bikker, J. A., van Rixtel, A. A., and S_rensen, C. K. (2011). A new approach to measuring competition in the loan markets of the euro area. Applied Economics, 43(23) :3155-3167.

81. Wahyoe Soedarmono, Fouad Machrouh, Amine Tarazi, 2011. Bank market power, economic growth and financial stability: Evidence from Asian banks.

Journal of Asian Economics, Volume 22, Issue 6, December 2011, 460-470.

TÀI LIỆU TRANG WEB

1. Heritage Foundation: http://

2. World Bank, Doing Business:

PHỤ LỤC Phụ lục 1: Danh mục các nước Đông Nam Á

Brunei Myanmar

Cambodia Philippines

Indonesia Singapore

Laos Thailand

Phụ lục 2. Thống kê mô tả của các biến

sum logZ badL Lerner banksize LtoA FitoA Legalright spvision logGDP Restr Freedom Gov

Phụ lục 2. 1 Chỉ số Lerner- Hồi quy mơ hình tác động cố định (Fixed effects model – FEM)

xtreg lncost lnQ lnQ2 lnW1 lnW2 lnW3 lnQlnW1 lnQlnW2 lnQlnW3 lnW1W2 lnW1W3 lnW2W3 lnW1sq lnW2sq lnW3sq trend trend2 lnW1trend lnW2trend lnW3 trend lnQtrend ,fe

Gov 1,120 .1285714 .3348745 0 1 Freedom 1,120 3.73375 .3359021 3 6.1 Restr 1,120 6.564286 .8722571 5 8 logGDP 1,112 1.67789 .4119642 -2.949867 2.131322 spvision 1,120 12.01319 1.345575 9.692308 14 Legalright 1,120 5.485714 2.705664 1 12 FitoA 953 .0127538 .013282 .0000252 .1121905 LtoA 953 .6233726 .1452024 .0000827 1.022242 banksize 956 .3987002 3.484916 -9.873172 6.012013 Lerner 611 .1986791 .1234644 -.5243991 .5980555 badL 601 .0288758 .0592233 .000741 1.343508 logZ 951 3.504334 .8822768 -.6606214 5.790268 Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max

Phụ lục 2. 2 Chỉ số Lerner- Hồi quy mơ hình tác động ngẫu nhiên (Random

effects model – REM)

.

F test that all u_i=0: F(97, 502) = 30.11 Prob > F = 0.0000 rho .95356368 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

sigma_e .06192309 sigma_u .28060704 _cons -1.50836 .404831 -3.73 0.000 -2.303731 -.7129878 lnQtrend -.00148 .0011517 -1.29 0.199 -.0037428 .0007827 trend 0 (omitted) lnW3 0 (omitted) lnW2trend -.0003974 .0032094 -0.12 0.902 -.006703 .0059081 lnW1trend -.0104489 .0022521 -4.64 0.000 -.0148736 -.0060242 trend2 -.0006517 .0006216 -1.05 0.295 -.0018729 .0005695 trend -.0354825 .013936 -2.55 0.011 -.0628626 -.0081024 lnW3sq .0099772 .0037 2.70 0.007 .0027078 .0172467 lnW2sq .0057055 .0173641 0.33 0.743 -.0284098 .0398207 lnW1sq -.0139769 .0079276 -1.76 0.078 -.0295523 .0015986 lnW2W3 -.0033241 .0117669 -0.28 0.778 -.0264425 .0197944 lnW1W3 -.1043038 .0094858 -11.00 0.000 -.1229404 -.0856671 lnW1W2 -.0118327 .0193465 -0.61 0.541 -.0498427 .0261773 lnQlnW3 -.0106872 .0032478 -3.29 0.001 -.0170682 -.0043062 lnQlnW2 -.0066726 .0106823 -0.62 0.532 -.0276602 .014315 lnQlnW1 .0170042 .0034015 5.00 0.000 .0103212 .0236872 lnW3 -.1494482 .0685176 -2.18 0.030 -.2840649 -.0148316 lnW2 .2835478 .1421869 1.99 0.047 .0041932 .5629025 lnW1 -.2635587 .0800876 -3.29 0.001 -.4209069 -.1062105 lnQ2 .0046796 .0042707 1.10 0.274 -.0037111 .0130704 lnQ .9423172 .0486561 19.37 0.000 .8467224 1.037912 lncost Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.4547 Prob > F = 0.0000 F(19,502) = 445.28 overall = 0.9912 max = 8 between = 0.9929 avg = 6.3 within = 0.9440 min = 1 R-sq: Obs per group:

Group variable: id Number of groups = 98 Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 619 note: trend omitted because of collinearity

xtreg lncost lnQ lnQ2 lnW1 lnW2 lnW3 lnQlnW1 lnQlnW2 lnQlnW3 lnW1W2 lnW1W3 lnW2W3 lnW1sq lnW2sq lnW3sq trend trend2 lnW1trend lnW2trend lnW3trend lnQtrend ,re theta

rho .80725917 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

sigma_e .06171677 sigma_u .12630566 _cons -.9696284 .3983383 -2.43 0.015 -1.750357 -.1888997 lnQtrend .0014393 .0006518 2.21 0.027 .0001618 .0027167 lnW3trend -.0033686 .0022724 -1.48 0.138 -.0078225 .0010853 lnW2trend .0027302 .0033292 0.82 0.412 -.0037948 .0092552 lnW1trend -.0104117 .0025148 -4.14 0.000 -.0153405 -.0054829 trend2 -.0013288 .0006516 -2.04 0.041 -.002606 -.0000516 trend -.0384766 .0155152 -2.48 0.013 -.0688859 -.0080674 lnW3sq .0067564 .0038329 1.76 0.078 -.0007559 .0142687 lnW2sq .0186013 .0169488 1.10 0.272 -.0146176 .0518203 lnW1sq .0046704 .0062897 0.74 0.458 -.0076572 .016998 lnW2W3 .0015243 .0118674 0.13 0.898 -.0217353 .0247839 lnW1W3 -.1010836 .0096083 -10.52 0.000 -.1199155 -.0822517 lnW1W2 -.0184889 .0196294 -0.94 0.346 -.0569618 .0199841 lnQlnW3 -.0094877 .0031688 -2.99 0.003 -.0156984 -.0032769 lnQlnW2 -.0125387 .0069625 -1.80 0.072 -.0261848 .0011075 lnQlnW1 .028048 .0025279 11.10 0.000 .0230935 .0330026 lnW3 -.1534614 .0686786 -2.23 0.025 -.2880691 -.0188538 lnW2 .4114591 .1378297 2.99 0.003 .141318 .6816003 lnW1 -.1633417 .0787296 -2.07 0.038 -.317649 -.0090345 lnQ2 -.0074308 .0010146 -7.32 0.000 -.0094195 -.0054422 lnQ .9736859 .0329877 29.52 0.000 .9090312 1.038341 lncost Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] 0.5610 0.6734 0.8184 0.8298 0.8298

min 5% median 95% max theta

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Wald chi2(20) = 51913.70 overall = 0.9965 max = 8 between = 0.9975 avg = 6.3 within = 0.9414 min = 1 R-sq: Obs per group:

Group variable: id Number of groups = 98 Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 619

Phụ lục 2. 3 Kiểm định lựa chọn mơ hình

Phụ lục 3. Ma trận hệ số tương quan

Phụ lục 4. Chỉ số Lerner theo quốc gia và theo năm (2011-2018)

Một phần của tài liệu (LUẬN văn THẠC sĩ) nghiên cứu mối tương quan giữa cạnh tranh và ổn định của các ngân hàng thương mại tại 10 quốc gia đông nam á giai đoạn 2011 2018 (Trang 68 - 90)