Trong tương lai đề tài có thể tiến hành thử nghiệm nhiều hơn về các chỉ số xếp hạng, các đề xuất cải tiến cũng cần được đưa vào ứng dụng thực tế.
Chương trình thu thập dữ liệu có thể mở rộng thêm các nguồn dữ liệu từ các hệ thống thư viện điện tử khác ngoài MAS, và các trang web chính thức của tác giả. Ngoài ra, cần xây dựng cơ chế kiểm tra dữ liệu tự động.
Hệ thống thư viện điện tử có thể được xây dựng thành một hệ thống ứng dụng hoàn chỉnh với đầy đủ tính năng.
DANH MỤC TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
Tiếng Việt:
1. [TC2011] Đỗ Văn Tiến, Nguyễn Phước Cường (2011). “Xây dựng và làm giàu kho chỉ mục bài báo khoa học dùng web crawler”, Báo cáo khóa luận, khoa Công Nghệ Phần Mềm, trường Đại học Công Nghệ Thông Tin.
Tiếng Anh:
1. [Aus2006] David Austin (2006) . “How Google Finds Your
Needle in the Web's Haystack”, Grand Valley State University,
Feature Column from the AMS, Monthly essays on mathematical topics.
2. [BM+2008] Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel. “Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using
data from biomedicine”. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, vol.59, 2008, pp. 830-837. 3. [BM+2009] Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter
Daniel. “DoWe Need the h Index and Its Variants in Addition to
Standard Bibliometric Measures?”. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology archive, vol.60, no.6, 06/2009.
4. [BP1998] Sergey Brin, Lawrence Page (1998). “The Anatomy
of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine”. Proceedings of
the 7th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW). Brisbane, Australia. pp. 107–117.
5. [BP+1998] Sergey Brin, Lawrence Page, Rajeev Motwani, Terry Winograd (1999). “The PageRank citation ranking: bringing
6. [Bur2007] Quentin L. Burrell. “Hirsch’s h-index: a stochastic
model”. Journal of In-formetrics, vol.1, no.1, 2007, pp.16–25.
7. [Bur2007a] Quentin L. Burrell. “On the h-index, the size of the
Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index”. Journal of Informetrics, vol.1, no.2,
2007, pp.170-177.
8. [BW+2008] Lutz Bornmann, Gerlind Wallon and Anna Ledin.
“Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using
molecular life sciences data”. Research Evaluation, vol.17, no.2,
06/2008, pp.149-156.
9. [CB2008] Rodrigo Costas, María Bordons. “Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level”.
Scientometrics, vol.77, no.2, 2008, pp.267-288. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
10.[Egg2006] Leo Egghe, “Theory and practise of the g-index”. Scientometrics, vol. 69, no.1, 2006, pp.131-152.
11.[ER2008] Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau. “An h-index
weighted by citation impact”. Information Processing &
Management, vol.4, 2008, pp.770-780.
12.[Hir2005] J. E. Hirsch (2005). “An index to quantify an
individual’s scientific research output”. PNAS.
13.[Hir2007] J. E. Hirsch. “Does the h index have predictive
power?”. PNAS, vol.104, no.49, 2007, pp.19193-19198.
14.[HK2003] Taher H. Haveliwala and Sepandar D. Kamvar (2003). “The Second Eigenvalue of the Google Matrix”. Stanford University.
15.[HK+2003] Taher Haveliwala, Sepandar Kamvar and Glen Jeh (2003). “An Analytical Comparison of Approaches to Personalizing
PageRank”. Stanford University.
16.[Jin2006] Bihui Jin. “H-index: an evaluation indicator
17.[Jin2010] Arif Jinha (2010). “Article 50 million: an estimate
of the number of scholarly articles in existence”. Learned
Publishing, vol.23, no.3, pp.258-263. DOI: 10.1087/20100308. 18.[JL+2007] Bihui Jin, Liming Liang, Ronald Rousseau, Leo
Egghe. “The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index”. Chinese Science Bulletin, vol.52, no.6, 2007, pp.855-863.
19.[Kos2006] Marek Kosmulski. “A new Hirsch-type index saves
time and works equally well as the original h-index”. ISSI
Newsletter, vol.2, no.3, 2006, pp.4-6.
20.[MY2007] Lokman I. Meho and Kiduk Yang. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of
Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar”. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.58, no.13, 2007, pp.2105-2125.
21.[NZ+2005] Zaiqing Nie, Yuanzhi Zhang, Ji-Rong Wen, Wei- Ying Ma (2005). “Object-level ranking: bringing order to web
objects”. Conference: World Wide Web Conference Series - WWW
, pp. 567-574. DOI: 10.1145/1060745.1060828
22.[Rou2006] Ronald Rousseau (2006). “New developments
related to the Hirsch index”. Truy xuất ngày 20/12/2012, từ
http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006376/.
23.[Rou2008] Ronald Rousseau. “Reflections on recent
developments of the h-index and h-type indices”. Collnet journal of (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
scientometrics and information management, vol.2, no.1, 06/2008. 24.[Sch2003] Barry Schwartz (2003). “The Paradox of Choice:
Why More Is Less”.
Web:
1. [ACM] http://dl.acm.org, 20/12/2011.
2. [CS] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu, 20/12/2011. 3. [CSX] http://csxstatic.ist.psu.edu/help, 20/12/2011.
5. [GSH] http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html , 20/12/2011. 6. [IEEE] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org, 20/12/2011. 7. [MAS] http://academic.research.microsoft.com, 17/01/2012. 8. [MASH] http://academic.research.microsoft.com /About/Help.htm, 17/01/2012. 9. [SL] http://www.springerlink.com/, 20/12/2011. 10.[WikiDB&SE] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /List_of_academic_databases_and_search_engines, 20/12/2011. 11.[WikiDS] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durfee_square, 02/09/2011. 12.[WikiErr] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Type_I_and_type_II_errors, 20/12/2011. 13.[WikiGF] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlassFish, 20/12/2011. 14.[WikiHI] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index, 02/09/2011. 15.[WikiIF] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor, 02/09/2011. 16.[WikiME] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Matthew_effect_(sociology), 02/09/2011. 17.[WikiPR] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pagerank , 02/09/2011. 18.[WikiSCI] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCIgen, 02/09/2011. 19.[WikiWC] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_crawler, 20/12/2011.