386 King Vajiravudh, Sia-­‐sala…, p 233

Một phần của tài liệu THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF SEXUAL PROPRIETY IN SIXTH REIGN SIAM (1910 1925) (Trang 84 - 86)

386  King  Vajiravudh,  Sia-­‐sala…,  p.  233.   387  Ibid.,  p.  178.  

388  King  Vajiravudh,  Phuean-­‐tai…,,  p.  35.  389  King  Vajiravudh,  Plukchai...,  pp.  15-­‐16.   389  King  Vajiravudh,  Plukchai...,  pp.  15-­‐16.  

selecting   a   partner   one   should   be   cautious   not   to   choose   a   bad   woman.390  Moreover,   suggesting  the  Wild  Tigers  to  be  ordained  as  monks,  Vajiravudh  considered  wives  and  

children  as  a  burden  that  would  distract  them  from  learning  the  dharma:    

 

“It  is  normal  that  your  wife  and  children  are  your  dearest  things.  Though  you   do  not  love  them  that  much,  you  cannot  help  but  worrying  about  them.  If  you   still   cannot   cut   such   concerns,   to   concentrate   on   learning   dharma   is  

impossible.”391  

 

From   1915   onwards,   however,   Rama   VI   shifted   from   focusing   on   male   friendships   and   threats   against   national   sovereignty   towards   instructing   men   and   women’s   identities   on   familial   practices.   Referring   to   public   opinions   and   Western   sexual   mores   in   his   verse   dramas,   intimate   relationships   outside   marriage   were  

criticized,   and   people   who   adopted   such   practice   condemned.392  Moreover,   to   marry   a  

promiscuous   woman   could   also   tarnish   one’s   social   reputation,   ruin   friendships   and  

relationships   with   other   members   of   the   family.393  The   King’s   class-­‐conscious   stance  

also  supported  sexual  propriety.  Honorable  men  marrying  a  good  woman  were  depicted   in   his   plays   in   the   dignified   roles   of   soldiers,   government   officials,   young   western   graduates,  and  even  the  roles  of  a  King.  Modern  women  characters  from  the  middle  to   high  social  strata    (daughters  or  nieces  of  high-­‐ranking  officials)  were  also  deployed  to   advocate  monogamy.    

Race  was  another  concern  of  Vajiravudh  throughout  his  reign.  Chinese  women,   for  instance,  were  deemed  as  a  threat  to  monogamous  family,  as  the  characters  of  minor   wife   or   secret   wife   in   “Huachai-­‐nakrop”   and   “Huachai-­‐chainum”   demonstrate.   In   the   realm   of   actual   policies,   the   King   prohibited   interracial   marriage.   In   1914,   the   royal   command  was  sent  to  embassies  in  European  countries  ordering  to  investigate  whether                                                                                                                  

390  King  Vajiravudh,  Lak-­‐ratchakan...,  p.  17.  391  King  Vajiravudh,  Thetsana…,  p.  103.   391  King  Vajiravudh,  Thetsana…,  p.  103.   392  King  Vajiravudh,  Phuean-­‐tai…,,pp.  42-­‐166.  

Thai   students   studying   abroad   had   developed   intimate   relationships   with   western  

women.394  Although   the   title   of   the   document   suggests   that   such   rule   applied   only   to  

princes,  the  document’s  text  indicates  that  any  students  or  government  officials  defying  

the  royal  command  would  be  returned  to  Siam  immediately.395  In  his  last  year  of  reign,  

the   King’s   speech   to   Thai   scholarship   students   pontificated   on   the   disadvantages   of   marrying   European   women.     Although   the   Siamese   aristocracy   had   a   long   history   of   intermarrying  with  foreigners,  Rama  VI  affirmed,  “Both  westerners  and  Thais  have  no  

respect   for   those   who   marry   a   person   of   a   different   nationality”.396  While   interracial  

marriage  could  discredit  male  patriotism,  Vajiravudh  attached  much  less  significance  to   women.   The   obsession   with   men’   sexual   practice   could   be   due   to   the   fact   that   he   was   surrounded   by   men   and   there   was   less   chance   of   Thai   women   marrying   westerners,   different  from  the  colonies.    

In  the  latter  years  of  his  reign,  Rama  VI  also  developed  the  notion  of  romantic   love   to   be   an   important   element   of   the   heterosexual   family.   Constantly   criticizing   arranged  marriages  according  to  social  and  financial  status,  Rama  VI  promoted  romantic   love  as  the  proper  motivation  for  marriage  in  his  plays,  which  unprecedentedly  included   hugging   and   kissing   scenes.   In   “Mai-­‐nambona”,   the   King   used   the   “pure   love”   of   a   modern   woman,   Mali,   to   turn   polygamy   into   an   acceptable   practice.   As   her   lover   was   accused   of   being   once   married,   she   eventually   agreed   to   be   his   second   wife:   “Because   she  has  time  to  think  …  and  she  feels  that  she  loves  Khun  Kaew  so  much  that  she  could  

not  let  any  cult  stop  her  love  for  him”397  

In   “Kontaek”   (1919)   Vajiravudh   also   compromised   his   integrity   to   consider   romantic  relationships  outside  marriage  as  morally  justifiable  on  some  conditions.  The   condition  of  an  arranged  marriage  was  in  his  opinion  more  vicious  than  polygamy.  This  

                                                                                                               

Một phần của tài liệu THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF SEXUAL PROPRIETY IN SIXTH REIGN SIAM (1910 1925) (Trang 84 - 86)