... in the proof oftheuniquenessof strong solutions Global existenceof strong solutions In this section, we prove the global existenceof strong solutions to the problem 1.2 – 1.7 by applying the ... well This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1 except theuniqueness assertion because ofthe presence of vacuum , which will be proved in the next section Uniquenessand stability of strong solutions ... 1.7 mean that the boundary is nonslip and impermeable The purpose ofthe present paper is to study the global existenceanduniquenessof strong solutions of problem 1.2 – 1.7 The important...
... in the proof oftheuniquenessof strong solutions Global existenceof strong solutions In this section, we prove the global existenceof strong solutions to the problem 1.2 – 1.7 by applying the ... well This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1 except theuniqueness assertion because ofthe presence of vacuum , which will be proved in the next section Uniquenessand stability of strong solutions ... 1.7 mean that the boundary is nonslip and impermeable The purpose ofthe present paper is to study the global existenceanduniquenessof strong solutions of problem 1.2 – 1.7 The important...
... (1.5) The proofs rely on the a priori bounds on solutions of Section andthe nonlinear alternative The following theorem gives theexistenceof solutions to the Dirichlet BVP on time scales Theorem ... operator by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem Therefore, Theorem 1.8 is applicable to T and T must have a fixed point Hence the BVP has a solution This concludes the proof The following theorem gives theexistence ... R on [a,σ (b)] (and there may exist further solutions satisfying y(t0 ) ≥ R for some t0 ∈ [a,σ (b)]) Proofs The proofs follow the modification technique of Theorems 3.6 and 3.7 and so are omitted...
... a contraction, and show theexistenceandtheuniquenessofthe solution in this space Finally, Section recapitulates the overall procedure ofthe article, and explains some ofthe intuitions ... us to use the usual argument ofthe Banach fixed point theorem, and to prove theexistenceandtheuniquenessofthe fixed point of Ψ, which is the solution ofthe differential equation (2), at ... with the physical intuition that the norm ofthe resulting beam deflection cannot be too large compared to that ofthe input loading w Meanwhile, the nonlinearity andthe non-uniformity of the...
... comparable to x and y, (5) we have the following result Theorem Adding condition (5) to the hypotheses of Theorem 1, we obtain uniquenessofthe fixed point Remark In Theorems and 2, the condition ... http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2011/1/25 Page ofand they proved theexistenceof positive solutions by means ofthe Krasnosel’skii fixed-point theorem and Legget-Williams fixed-point theorem Recently, in the paper [18] to ... condition is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.3 of [23] We present this proof for completeness Theorem Under assumptions of Theorem and suppose that f(t0, 0) ≠ for certain t0 Î [0, 1] Then, Problem (2)...
... comparable to x and y, (5) we have the following result Theorem Adding condition (5) to the hypotheses of Theorem 1, we obtain uniquenessofthe fixed point Remark In Theorems and 2, the condition ... http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2011/1/25 Page ofand they proved theexistenceof positive solutions by means ofthe Krasnosel’skii fixed-point theorem and Legget-Williams fixed-point theorem Recently, in the paper [18] to ... condition is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.3 of [23] We present this proof for completeness Theorem Under assumptions of Theorem and suppose that f(t0, 0) ≠ for certain t0 Î [0, 1] Then, Problem (2)...
... QT , u1 , u2 ∈ R Existenceanduniqueness In this section, we show the local existenceanduniquenessof weak solutions of (1.1)(1.3) First, we show the local existence results Theorem 2.1 Assume ... carried out the proof of existence, BW conceived ofthe study, and participated in its design and coordination All authors read and approved the final manuscript Competing interests The authors ... a weak solution of (1.1)(1.3) □ The following is theuniqueness result to the solution ofthe system Theorem 2.2 Assume that f = (f1, f2) is Lipschitz continuous in (u1, u2), then (1.1)(1.3)...
... theorem, we have the conclusion ofthe theorem Remark 3.3 In Theorem 3.2, if we furthermore suppose that the hypothesis H4 − f t, v t f t, u t ≤L u−v , L > 0, 3.28 holds, then we can obtain the ... operators on a Banach space X The function a · is real valued and locally integrable on 0, ∞ , andthe nonlinear maps f and g are defined on 0, T × X into X New existenceanduniqueness results are given ... as a consequence ofthe continuity of S t in the uniform operator topology for t > by the compactness of S t So I3 → as t2 → t1 → 0, as t2 → t1 , which is independent of u Therefore Φ is Thus,...
... suggestions and comments, which improved the quality of this paper The work was supported by the NSF of China, the NSF of Jiangxi Province of China 2008GQS0057 , the Youth Foundation of Jiangxi ... section, we prove an existenceanduniqueness theorem for 1.1 Theorem 2.1 Suppose the following assumptions hold: A1 g ∈ C1 R, R and g x < for all x ∈ R; A2 there exist a constant r ≥ and a function ... special case and its variants, where ϕp s of 1.1 However, there are seldom results about theexistenceof periodic solutions to 1.1 The main difficulty lies in the p-Laplacian-like operator ϕ of 1.1...
... solution ofthe BVP 1.1 and 1.2 Next, we show theuniquenessof solutions ofthe BVP 1.1 and 1.2 Assume, to the contrary, that there exist two nontrivial solutions y1 and y2 ofthe BVP 1.1 and 1.2 ... relax the assumptions A1 and B1 on the nonlinear term, without demanding theexistenceof upper and lower solutions, we present conditions for the BVP 1.1 and 1.2 to have a unique solution and then ... 1–7 and references therein Especially, there was much attention focused on theexistenceand multiplicity of positive solutions of fourth-order problem, for example, 8–10 , and in particular the...
... completes the proof ofthe theorem Boundary Value Problems 13 Theorem 3.2 Assume that conditions C0 , C1 , and C2 are satisfied Then SBVP 1.1 , 1.2 has exactly one positive solution Proof Theuniqueness ... completes the proof ofthe lemma Lemma 2.7 Assume that conditions C0 , C1 , and C2 are satisfied Then, the unique solution u t; h of BVP 2.1 h is nondecreasing in h Proof Let < h2 < h1 , and let ... s ds Take t ∈ 0, and Δt such that t Δt ∈ 0, , then from the definition of derivative, the mean value theorem of Boundary Value Problems integral, andthe absolute continuity of integral, we have...
... a contraction, and show theexistenceandtheuniquenessofthe solution in this space Finally, Section recapitulates the overall procedure ofthe article, and explains some ofthe intuitions ... us to use the usual argument ofthe Banach fixed point theorem, and to prove theexistenceandtheuniquenessofthe fixed point of Ψ, which is the solution ofthe differential equation (2), at ... with the physical intuition that the norm ofthe resulting beam deflection cannot be too large compared to that ofthe input loading w Meanwhile, the nonlinearity andthe non-uniformity of the...
... study theexistenceanduniquenessof smooth positive solutions to the second-order singular m-point boundary value problem 1.1 and 1.2 A necessary and sufficient condition for theexistenceof smooth ... Problems In view of 1.11 andthe definition of Gn t, s , we can obtain u t ≥ 0, t ∈ 0, bn This completes the proof of Lemma 1.3 Now we state the main results of this paper as follows Theorem 1.4 Suppose ... Province Q2008A03 andthe Doctoral Program Foundation of Education Ministry of China 200804460001 References X Du and Z Zhao, “A necessary and sufficient condition oftheexistenceof positive solutions...
... of BVP 1.1 , 1.2 and satisfies 3.3 Now we give a uniqueness theorem by assuming additionally the differentiability for functions f, g and h, and a kind of estimating condition in Theorem 3.1 Theorem ... functions, and μi ∈ R, i 0, 1, , n − are arbitrary given constants The tools we mainly used are the method of upper and lower solutions and Leray-Schauder degree theory Note that for the cases of ... Proof Theexistenceof a solution for BVP 1.1 , 1.2 satisfying 3.3 follows from Theorem 3.1 Now, we prove theuniquenessof solution for BVP 1.1 , 1.2 To this, we let x1 t x2 t − x1 t It and...
... is comparable to x and y, 2.10 then we have the following theorem Theorem 2.9 Adding condition 2.10 to the hypotheses of Theorem 2.8 one obtains uniquenessofthe fixed point of f In our considerations, ... paper we will prove theexistenceanduniquenessof a positive and nondecreasing solution for the problem 1.1 by using a fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets Existenceof fixed point in partially ... Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem and nonlinear alternative of Leray-Schauder type in a cone and assuming certain hypotheses on the function f In theuniquenessofthe solution is not treated...
... ∞ is continuous and nondecreasing; h : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous and nonincreasing, and h may be singular at y Next, we consider theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions for the following singular ... 0, 3.5 Then from 3.4 , we have the next lemma Lemma 3.1 If x t is a solution of 3.5 , then y t is a solution of 1.1 Further, if y t is a solution of 1.1 , imply that x t is a solution of 3.5 ... Agarwal and F.-H Wong, Existenceof positive solutions for higher order difference equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 10, no 5, pp 67–74, 1997 14 X Lin, D Jiang, and X Li, Existenceand uniqueness...
... ∞ is continuous and nondecreasing; h : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous and nonincreasing, and h may be singular at y Next, we consider theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions for the following singular ... 0, 3.5 Then from 3.4 , we have the next lemma Lemma 3.1 If x t is a solution of 3.5 , then y t is a solution of 1.1 Further, if y t is a solution of 1.1 , imply that x t is a solution of 3.5 ... Agarwal and F.-H Wong, Existenceof positive solutions for higher order difference equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol 10, no 5, pp 67–74, 1997 14 X Lin, D Jiang, and X Li, Existenceand uniqueness...
... for theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions ofthe dynamic equation (Ln ) For this, we take as reference the results obtained in [3, 4], where theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions of problem ... Using the results proved in Sections and 3, we will obtain in Sections andthe expression of Green’s function and a sufficient condition for theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions ofthe dynamic ... obtain the following result that assures theexistenceanduniquenessof solutions ofthe dynamic equation (L1 ) in the sector [α,β], with α and β a pair of coupled lower and upper solutions of (L1...
... results as Theorem in are obtained in We will prove Theorem 1.1 a and b in Sections and 4, respectively The proof of Theorem 1.2 is included in the proof of Theorem 1.1 a In the following, R and T ... > 0, and p > max{1, m} Then every nontrivial solution u x, t of 1.1 blows up in finite time Remark 1.3 Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are the extension ofthe results of If we put σ these theorems, the ... the other hand, 6–9 and so on study the inhomogeneous equations i.e., f x / ≡ in 1.1 Bandle et al study the case m 1, σ 0, and Zeng and Zhang study the case σ In this paper, we investigate the...