Thông tin tài liệu
12
Adaptive CDMA networks
12.1 BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK
This section presents a throughput delay performance of a centralized unslotted Direct
Sequence/Code Division Multiple Access (DS/CDMA) packet radio network (PRN) using
bit rate adaptive location aware channel load sensing protocol (CLSP).
The system model is based on the following assumptions. Let us consider the reverse
link of a single-cell unslotted DS/CDMA PRN with infinite population and circle cell
coverage centered to a hub station. Users communicate via the hub using different codes
for packet transmissions with the same quality of service (QoS) requirements [e.g. the
target bit error rate (BER) is 10
−6
]. The radio packets considered herein are of medium
access control (MAC) layer (i.e. MAC frames formed after data segmentations and cod-
ing). Packets have the same length of L (bits). The scheduling of packet transmissions,
including the retransmissions of unsuccessful packets at mobile terminals, is randomized
sufficiently enough so that it is possible to approximate the offered traffic of each user
to be the same, and the overall number of packets is generated according to the Poisson
process with rate λ. In the sequel, we will use the following notation:
ζ – the path-loss exponent of the radio propagation attenuation in the range of [2, 5]
r – the distance of a mobile terminal from the central hub that is normalized to the cell
radius, thus in the range of [0, 1]
R
0
– the primary data rate for given system coverage and efficiency of mobile power
consumption;
T
0
– the packet duration (i.e. the time duration needed for transmitting a packet com-
pletely) of the primary rate T
0
= L/R
0
.
The cell area is divided into M + 1 rings (M is a natural number representing the
spatial resolution) centered to the hub. Let M ={0, 1, ,M};andforallm ∈ M,
r
m
– the normalized radius of the boundary-circle of ring (m +1) given by r
m
= 2
−m/ζ
,
r
0
= 1 for the cell-bounding circle and r
M+1
= 0 for the most inner ring;
R
m
– the rate of packet transmissions from users in ring (m + 1) given by R
m
= 2
m
R
0
,
that is, packets from the more inner ring will be transmitted with the higher bit rate;
Adaptive WCDMA: Theory And Practice.
Savo G. Glisic
Copyright
¶ 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISBN: 0-470-84825-1
422 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
T
m
– the corresponding packet duration T
m
= 2
−m
T
0
and also the mean service time of a
packet transmission using rate R
m
.
For a fixed packet length L, the closer the mobile terminal to the hub, the higher
is the bit rate and the shorter is the packet transmission time. In order to ensure the
optimal operation of transceivers, the packet duration should be kept not too short, for
example, minimum of around 10 ms as the radio frame duration of the 3GPP standards
for WCDMA cellular systems. Therefore, a proper trade-off between L, R
0
and M is
needed. For example, with L = 2560 bits, R
0
= 32 kbps and M = 3, there are four
possible rates for packet transmissions: 32, 64, 128 and 256 kbps with 80, 40, 20 and
10 ms packet duration, respectively. In the absence of shadowing, for the same mobile
transmitter power denoted by P from any location in the network, approximated with
the spatial resolution described above, the received energy per frame denoted by E is
the same:
E =
PT
m
r
ζ
m
=
P 2
−m
T
0
(2
−m/ζ
)
ζ
= PT
0
(12.1)
This significantly reduces the maximum radiated power into the user direction, reducing
the health risk and the interference level produced in the adjacent cell and therefore
increasing capacity in the cell. The bit-energy E
b
= E/L is also constant. Let
W – the CDMA chip rate, for example, 3.84 Mcps;
g
m
– the processing gain of a transmission using rate R
m
that is given by g
m
= W/R
m
;
η – the ratio of the thermal noise density and maximum tolerable interference (N
0
/I
0
);
γ
m
– the local average signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR), also denotes the
target SINR for meeting the QoS requirements of transmissions with rate R
m
.
The transmitter power control (TPC) is assumed sufficient enough to ensure that the
local average SINR can be considered as a lognormal random variable having standard
deviation σ in the range of 2 dB. Because the transmitter power of mobile terminals in
the rate adaptive system is kept at the norm level (denoted by P above), the dynamic
range of TPC can be significantly reduced compared to the fixed rate counterpart for the
same coverage resulting in less sensitive operation. Thus, σ of the adaptive system can be
expected to be smaller than that in the fixed rate system. Once again, if there were only
near–far effects in the radio propagation, due to rate adaptation and perfect TPC, SINR
of all transmissions would be the same at the hub. However, the required SINR target of
higher bit rate transmissions in DS/CDMA systems tends to be lower for the same BER
performance due to less multiple access interference (MAI). For example, the simulation
results of Reference [1] show that in the same circumstances the required SINR target
for 16-kbps transmissions is almost double that of the 256 kbps transmissions. Thus, less
transmitter power is needed for close-in users using higher data rate. The rate/space adap-
tive transmissions increase the energy efficiency for mobile terminals. It will be shown
later that even when the same target SINR was required regardless of the bit rates, the
adaptive system still outperforms the fixed counterpart. In the sequel, we will use the
following notation:
BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK 423
n ={n
m
,m ∈ M} is the system state or occupancy vector, where n
m
is the number of
packet transmissions in progress using rate R
m
;
w ={w
m
,m∈ M} is the transmission load vector, where w
m
= g
−1
m
γ
m
represents the
average load factor produced by a packet transmission with rate R
m
and target SINR
γ
m
. The higher the bit rate, the more the network resources that will be occupied by
the transmission.
c = nw is the system load state representing MAI in the steady state condition.
It has been shown in Chapter 11 that simultaneous transmissions are considered ade-
quate, that is, meeting the QoS requirements, if MAI satisfies the following condition:
MAI ≡
m∈M
n
m
w
m
≤ (1 − η) (12.2)
The task of CLSP is to e nsure that the condition (12.2) is always satisfied. Define
={n, condition (12.2) is true} the set of all possible system states;
={c, c = nw and n ∈ } the set of all possible system load states.
Because of the TPC inaccuracy, the probability that the condition (12.2) is satisfied
and the SINR of each packet transmission is kept at the target level, conditioned on the
steady system load state c and lognormal SINR can be determined as in Chapter 11,
equation (11.30)
P
ok
(c) = 1 − Q
1 − η −E[MAI|c]
√
Var [M AI |c]
(12.3)
with
E[MAI|c] = c exp[(ln 10/10σ)
2
/2]
Var [M AI |c] = c exp[2(ln 10/10σ)
2
]
where Q(x) is the standard Gaussian integral function, and σ is the standard deviation
of lognormal SINR in dB. This is because the system load state c defined above uses
the mean (target) values of lognormal SINR for calculating the average load factor of
each transmission. The Gaussian integral term Q(x) in equation (12.3) represents the
total error probability caused by a sum of lognormal random variable composing the
load state.
The above analysis implies that in the equilibrium condition, for a given system load
state c, the system will meet its QoS target (e.g. actual bit error probability is less than
the target BER of 1e-5) with a probability of P
ok
(c). In other words, it will lose its QoS
target (actual bit error probability is larger than the target BER of 1e-5) with a probability
1 − P
ok
(c). As a consequence, each equilibrium system load state c can be modeled with
a hidden Markov model (HMM) having two states, namely ‘good’ and ‘bad’, which is
illustrated in Figure 12.1.
424 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
good bad
Figure 12.1 Two-state HMM of the system load state.
The stationary probability of HMM state (‘good’ or ‘bad’) conditioned on the system
load state c is given by
Pr{‘good’|c}=P
ok
(c) (12.4)
Pr{‘bad’|c}=1 − P
ok
(c) (12.5)
Let us introduce two other parameters for analytical evaluation purposes:
P
eg
– the equilibrium bit error probability over all ‘good’ states of the channel, in which
the QoS requirements are met. The target BER is supposed to be the worst case of
P
eg
, for example, 1e-5.
P
eb
– the equilibrium bit error probability over all ‘bad’ states of the channel, in which
the QoS requirements are missed to some extent, for example, P
eb
= 1e − 4whenthe
target BER is 1e − 5. The target BER is therefore the upper bound of P
eb
.
In the perfect-controlled system, P
eg
= P
eb
and equal to the target BER. This assump-
tion is widely used in the related publications investigating the system performance on the
radio packet level. In this section, the impacts of channel imperfection are evaluated in
the context of SINR errors with total standard deviation σ and P
eb
as a variable parameter
representing effects of ‘bad’ channel condition. Let
p(c) – the steady state probability of being in the system load state c ∈ ;
P
e
– the equilibrium bit error probability of the system for the actual QoS of packet
transmissions. From the above results, we have
P
e
=
c∈
cp(c)
−1
P
eg
c∈
cp(c) Pr{‘good’|c}+P
eb
c∈
cp(c) Pr{‘bad’|c}
(12.6)
It is obvious that in the perfect-controlled system as mentioned above, P
e
is also equal
to the target BER. Let
P
c
– the equilibrium probability of a correct packet transmission. With employment of
forward error correction (FEC) mechanism having the maximum number of correctable
BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK 425
bits N
e
(N
e
<Land dependent on the coding method; N
e
= 0 when FEC is not used),
P
c
is generally given by
P
c
=
N
e
i=0
L
i
P
i
e
(1 − P
e
)
L−i
(12.7)
In the fixed rate system with the same coverage, the primary rate R
0
is used for all packet
transmissions. From equation (12.2) under perfect TPC assumption, the channel threshold
or system capacity defined as the maximum number of simultaneous packet transmissions
can be determined by
C
0
=(1 − η)/w
0
(12.8)
where x is the maximum integer number not exceeding the argument.
Thus, with respect to CLSP, the hub senses the channel load (i.e. MAI, in general,
or the number of ongoing transmissions for the fixed rate system) and broadcasts the
control information periodically in a forward control channel. Users having packets to
send should listen to the control channel and decide to transmit or refrain from the
transmission in a nonpersistent way. The feedback control is assumed to be perfect, that
is, zero propagation delay and perfect transceivers in the forward direction. The impacts of
system imperfection, such as access delay, feedback delay and imperfect sensing have been
investigated in Chapter 11 for the fixed rate systems with dynamic persistent control. Let
G – the system offered traffic G = λT
0
(the average number of packets per normalized
T
0
≡ 1) is kept the same for both adaptive and fixed rate systems for fair comparison
purposes. In the adaptive system, G ≡ λ is distributed spatially among users that are in
different rings.
For m ∈ M,let
λ
m
– be the packet arrival rate from ring (m +1), which is dependent on λ and the
spatial user distribution (SUD) having the probability density function (PDF) f(r,θ).In
general, λ
m
is given by
λ
m
= λ
r
m
r
m+1
2π
0
f(r,θ)dr dθ(12.9)
For instance, let us assume that the SUD is uniform per unit area in the mobility equilib-
rium condition. Thus, λ
m
can be determined by
λ
m
= λ(r
2
m
− r
2
m+1
)(12.10)
For the derivation of the performance characteristics of the rate adaptive C LSP unslotted
CDMA PRN, a multirate loss system model of the stochastic knapsack-packing prob-
lem [2] can be used. The analysis presented in this section can therefore be used for
investigating PRNs supporting multimedia applications and QoS differentiation, where
users transmit with different rates depending on the system load state, their potential
subscriber class and the required services.
426 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
12.1.1 Performance evaluation
Fixed-rate CLSP
The performance characteristics of the unslotted CDMA PRN using fixed-rate CLSP
under perfect TPC is given in Chapter 11. Herein, we consider the system with imperfect
TPC. Define
n – the number of ongoing packet transmissions in the system or the system state;
p
n
– the steady state probability of the system state n;
P
succ
– the equilibrium probability of successful packet transmissions;
S – the system throughput as the average number of successful packet transmissions per
T
0
;
D – the average packet delay normalized by T
0
;
Using the standard results of the queuing theory for Erlang loss formula [3] with the
number of servers set to the channel threshold C
0
, the arrival rate of λ and the normalized
service rate of 1/T
0
≡ 1, we have for the steady state solutions:
p
n
=
G
n
/n!
C
0
i=0
G
i
/i!
for 0 ≤ n ≤ C
0
(12.11)
The equilibrium probability of a successful packet transmission consists of two factors.
The first factor is the probability that the given packet is not blocked by the CLSP given
by (1 − B), where B is the packet blocking probability:
B = p
C
0
(12.12)
The second factor is the equilibrium probability of correct packet transmissions P
c
given
by equation (12.7) with a modification of equation (12.6) as given below:
P
e
=
C
0
n=0
np
n
−1
P
eg
C
0
n=0
np
n
Pr{‘good’|n}+P
eb
C
0
n=0
np
n
Pr{‘bad’|n}
(12.13)
where similarly to equations (12.4) and (12.5)we have
Pr{‘good’|n}=1 −Q
C
0
− ne
(ln 10/10σ)
2
/2
√
ne
2(ln 10/10σ)
2
(12.14)
Pr{‘bad’|n}=1 −Pr{‘good’|n} (12.15)
The equilibrium probability of a successful packet transmission, P
succ
, is now given by
P
succ
= (1 − B)P
c
(12.16)
BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK 427
The system throughput is given by
S = GP
succ
(12.17)
The average packet delay is decomposed into two parts: D
b
the average waiting time of
a packet for accessing the channel including back-off delays and D
r
the average resident
time of the given packet from the instant of entering to the instant of leaving the system
successfully. Formally, the average packet delay (normalized to T
0
)isgivenby
D = D
b
+ D
r
(12.18)
with
D
b
=
∞
i=0
B
i
=
B
1 − B
(12.19)
and according to Little’s formula [3]
D
r
= S
−1
C
0
n=0
np
n
(12.20)
Thus, the performance characteristics can be optimized subject to trade-off of the packet
length and the transmission rate. This can be achieved by using adaptive radio techniques
for link adaptation.
Rate adaptive CLSP
This system, as mentioned above, can be modeled with a multirate loss network model.
It is well known that the steady state solutions of such a system have a product form [2]
given by
p(n) =
1
G
0
m∈M
α
n
m
m
n
m
!
n ∈ (12.21)
with
G
0
=
n∈
m∈M
α
n
m
m
n
m
!
where p(n) is the steady state probability of having n transmission combination in the
system, n ∈ ; α
m
is the offered traffic intensity from ring (m + 1) using rate R
m
. Thus,
α
m
= λ
m
T
m
,whereλ
m
and T
m
are defined above.
For large state sets, that is, large M and C
0
, the cost of computation with the above for-
mulas is prohibitively high. This problem has been considered by many authors, resulting
in elegant and efficient recursion techniques for the calculation of the steady system load
state and blocking probabilities. The steady state probability p(c) of system load state
428 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
c ∈ defined above can be obtained by using the stochastic knapsack approximation
described in R eference [2]
p(c) =
q(c)
c∈
q(c)
(12.22)
with q(c) given in recursive form as
q(c) =
1
c
m∈M
w
m
α
m
q(c − w
m
) for c ∈
+
,q(0) = 1andq(−) = 0
The equilibrium probability of successful transmissions using rate R
m
can be determined
similarly to equation (12.16) as
P
succ m
= (1 − B
m
)P
c
(12.23)
where P
c
is given by equation (12.7) with P
e
given by equation (12.6) and B
m
is the
packet blocking probability of transmissions using rate R
m
from ring (m + 1)
B
m
=
c∈:c>C
0
w
0
−w
m
p(c) (12.24)
The system throughput can be given by
S =
m∈M
λ
m
P
succ m
(12.25)
Note that G = λT
0
≡
m∈M
λ
m
because of normalized T
0
≡ 1. The average packet delay
of this system, similar to equation (12.18), can be obtained by
D =
m∈M
D
b m
T
m
+ D
r
(12.26)
with the components
D
b m
=
B
m
1 − B
m
(12.27)
D
r
=
m∈M
λ
m
P
succ m
w
m
−1
c∈
cp(c) (12.28)
For illustration purposes, the system parameters summarized in Table 12.1 are used [4].
Two simple SUDs are considered: the two-dimensional uniform (per unit area) and the
one-dimensional uniform (per unit length) distributions. For the first scenario, the packet
arrival rate from ring (m + 1) is given in equation (12.6). For the second scenario, the
BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK 429
Table 12.1 System parameter summary [4]. Reproduced from Phan, V. and Glisic, S. (2002)
Unslotted DS/CDMA Packet Radio Network Using Rate/Space Adaptive CLSP-ICC’02,NewYork,
May 2002, by permission of IEEE
Name Definition Values
W CDMA chip rate 3.84 Mcps
η Coefficient of the thermal noise density −10 dB
and max. tolerable interference
ζ Path-loss exponent 2, 3, 4
L Packet length 2560, 5120 bits
R
0
Primary rate 32 kbps
γ
0
SINR target of primary rate 3 dB
transmission
C
0
Fixed primary rate system capacity 56
M + 1 Number of possible rates 4
R
m
Rate of ring 2, 3, 4 for m = 1, 2, 3 64, 128, 256 kbps
γ
m
SINR target of R
m
rate transmission for 3 dB or γ
0
for all rates
1e − 5targetBER
σ Standard deviation of lognormal SINR 1, 2, 3 dB
P
eg
Equilibrium bit error probability over 1e − 5
‘good’ condition
P
eb
Equilibrium bit error probability over 1e − 5, 5e − 4, 1e − 3
‘bad’ condition
packet arrival rate from ring (m + 1) is given by λ
m
= λ(r
m
− r
m+1
) with r
m
= 2
−m/ζ
and r
M+1
= 0 as defined above. This one-dimensional uniform SUD is often used for
modeling the indoor office environment in which users are located along the corridor
or the highway. The target SINR is set to 3 dB for all transmissions regardless of the
bit rates. This is not taking into account the fact that higher bit rate transmissions need
smaller target SINR for the same QoS than the lower bit rate transmissions. The load
factor introduced by the transmission is therefore linearly increasing with the bit rate
that is compensated by shortening the transmission period with the same factor. Because
of this, under perfect-controlled a ssumption (P
eb
= P
eg
set to target BER as explained
above), the fixed rate CLSP system could have slightly better multiplexing gain than
the adaptive counterpart for the same offered traffic resulting in slightly better through-
put as shown in Figure 12.2. In reality, the BER is changing because of the random
noise and interference corrupting the packet transmissions. The throughput characteris-
tic of the fixed system worsens much faster than that of the adaptive system because
it suffers from higher MAI owing to larger number of simultaneous transmissions and
longer transmission period. Further, when the transmission is corrupted, longer trans-
mission period or packet length could cause a drop of the throughput performance and
wasting battery energy (Figures 12.2 and 12.6). In any case, the adaptive system has
much better packet delay c haracteristics than the fixed counterpart (Figures 12.2–12.7).
The same can be expected for the throughput performance in real channel condition or
430 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
System offered traffic
System throughput
Fixed perfect-ctrl system
Adaptive perfect-ctrl
Fixed bad-BER = 5e − 4
Adaptive bad-BER = 5e − 4
Fixed bad-BER = 1e − 3
Adaptive bad-BER = 1e − 3
Figure 12.2 Effects of channel imperfection on the throughput performance (two-dimensional
uniform SUD, ζ = 3, σ = 2dB, L = 2560 bits, P
eg
= 1e − 5).
0
10 20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
1
2
3
4
4.5
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
Average packet delay
System offered traffic
Fixed perfect-ctrl system
Adaptive perfect-ctrl
Fixed bad-BER = 5e − 4
Adaptive bad-BER = 5e − 4
Fixed bad-BER = 1e − 3
Adaptive bad-BER = 1e − 3
Figure 12.3 Effect of channel imperfection on the packet delay performance (two-dimensional
uniform SUD, ζ = 3, σ = 2dB, L = 2560 bits, P
eg
= 1e − 5).
[...]...431 BIT RATE/SPACE ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORK 2.5 Average packet delay 2 Fixed system Adaptive system with 1-dim uniform SUD Adaptive system with 2-dim uniform SUD 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 System throughput Figure 12.4 Effects of SUD on the performance trade-off (ζ = 3, σ = 2 dB, L = 2560 bits, Peg = 1e − 5, Peb = 5e − 4) 2.5 Fixed system Adaptive with attenuation-exponent of 2 Adaptive with attenuation-exponent... Fixed T = 40 ms Fixed T = 20 ms Fixed T = 10 ms Adaptive T (A1) Adaptive T (A2) 0.5 0.4 0.3 GammaPDF(a = 2, b = 6) for DfD 0.2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 System offered traffic G0 Figure 12.13 Normalized system throughput for comparison 50 448 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS 3.5 Fixed T = 80 (ms) Fixed T = 40 (ms) Fixed T = 20 (ms) Fixed T = 10 (ms) Adaptive T (A1) Adaptive T (A2) Normalized average packet delay... performance characteristics of both fixed and adaptive packet-length systems To assure the fairness of performance comparison, for the fixed packet-length system, the packet 1 Normalized system throughput 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Fixed T = 40 ms, uniform DfD Adaptive T (A1), uniform DfD Adaptive T (A2), uniform DfD Fixed T = 40 ms, exponential DfD Adaptive T (A1), exponential DfD Adaptive T (A2), exponential DfD 0.5... traffic G0 Figure 12.16 Effects of the mobility or DfD to throughput performance in the flat-fading channel 450 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS 2.5 Fixed T = 40 ms, uniform DfD Adaptive T (A1), uniform DfD Adaptive T (A2), uniform DfD Fixed T = 40 ms, exponential DfD Adaptive T (A1), exponential DfD Adaptive T (A2), exponential DfD Normalized average packet delay 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 System... attenuation-exponent of 3 Adaptive with attenuation-exponent of 4 Average packet delay 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 System throughput Figure 12.5 Effects of propagation model on the performance trade-off (two-dimensional uniform SUD, σ = 2 dB, L = 2560 bits, Peg = 1e − 5, Peb = e − 4) 432 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS 4.5 Fixed system L = 2560 bits Adaptive L = 2560 bits Fixed system L = 5120 bits Adaptive L... or DfD to packet-delay performance in the flat-fading channel 1 Normalized system goodput 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Fixed T = 40 ms, uniform DfD Adaptive T (A1), uniform DfD Adaptive T (A2), uniform DfD Fixed T = 40 ms, exponential DfD Adaptive T (A1), exponential DfD Adaptive T (A2), exponential DfD 0.4 0.3 0.2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 System offered traffic G0 Figure 12.18 Effects of the mobility or... Normalized system goodput 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Fixed T = 80 ms Fixed T = 40 ms Fixed T = 20 ms Fixed T = 10 ms Adaptive T (A1) Adaptive T (A2) 0.4 0.3 0.2 5 10 15 20 GammaPDF(a = 2,b = 6) for DfD 25 30 35 40 System offered traffic G0 Figure 12.15 Normalized system goodput 449 MAC LAYER PACKET LENGTH ADAPTIVE CDMA RADIO NETWORKS normalized T0 ) for the GammaPDF(a = 2, b = 6) DfD scenario These figures clearly... presented in this chapter because of limited space Overall, the adaptive system outperforms the fixed counterpart Figures 12.4 to 12.7 show the effects of design and modeling parameters on the performance characteristics The adaptive system is sensitive to the SUDs (Figure 12.4) and path-loss exponent ζ (Figure 12.5) In the rate/space adaptive systems, spatial positions of the clusters formed by mobile... that represents the TPC errors Although the adaptive system can be expected to have better TPC performance and thus smaller σ , the same value of σ is used for both systems in the numerical examples The throughput-delay performance of unslotted DS/CDMA PRNs using rate/spaceadaptive CLSP is evaluated against the fixed rate counterpart The combination of CLSP and adaptive multirate transmissions not only... 2.5 2 Fixed with 2 dB SINR std deviation Adaptive with 2 dB SINR std dev Fixed with 3 dB SINR std dev Adaptive with 3 dB SINR std dev 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 20 25 15 System throughput 30 35 40 Figure 12.7 Effects of TPC inaccuracy on the performance trade-off (two-dimensional uniform SUD, ζ = 3, L = 2560 bits, Peg = 1e − 5, Peb = 5e − 4) MAC LAYER PACKET LENGTH ADAPTIVE CDMA RADIO NETWORKS 433 even in . higher bit rate;
Adaptive WCDMA: Theory And Practice.
Savo G. Glisic
Copyright
¶ 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISBN: 0-470-84825-1
422 ADAPTIVE CDMA NETWORKS
T
m
–. traffic
Fixed perfect-ctrl system
Adaptive perfect-ctrl
Fixed bad-BER = 5e − 4
Adaptive bad-BER = 5e − 4
Fixed bad-BER = 1e − 3
Adaptive bad-BER = 1e − 3
Figure
Ngày đăng: 21/01/2014, 07:20
Xem thêm: Tài liệu Adaptive WCDMA (P12) docx, Tài liệu Adaptive WCDMA (P12) docx