Change in contemporary english a grammatical study by geoffrey leech

373 43 0
Change in contemporary english  a grammatical study  by geoffrey leech

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

This page intentionally left blank Change in Contemporary English Based on the systematic analysis of large amounts of computer-readable text, this book shows how the English language has been changing in the recent past, often in unexpected and previously undocumented ways The study is based on a group of matching corpora, known as the ‘Brown family’ of corpora, supplemented by a range of other corpus materials, both written and spoken, drawn mainly from the later twentieth century Among the matters receiving particular attention are the influence of American English on British English, the role of the press, the ‘colloquialization’ of written English, and a wide range of grammatical topics, including the modal auxiliaries, progressive, subjunctive, passive, genitive and relative clauses These subjects build an overall picture of how English grammar is changing, and the linguistic and social factors that are contributing to this process            is Emeritus Professor of English Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics and English Language at Lancaster University   is Professor of Linguistics in the Department of English at the University of Zăurich             is Professor of English Linguistics in the Department of English at the University of Freiburg       is Lecturer in English Language and Linguistics in the School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary History at the University of Salford     General editor Merja Kytăo (Uppsala University) Editorial Board Bas Aarts (University College London), John Algeo (University of Georgia), Susan Fitzmaurice (Northern Arizona University), Charles F Meyer (University of Massachusetts) The aim of this series is to provide a framework for original studies of English, both present-day and past All books are based securely on empirical research, and represent theoretical and descriptive contributions to our knowledge of national and international varieties of English, both written and spoken The series covers a broad range of topics and approaches, including syntax, phonology, grammar, vocabulary, discourse, pragmatics and sociolinguistics, and is aimed at an international readership Already published in this series: Christian Mair: Infinitival Complement Clauses in English: A Study of Syntax in Discourse Charles F Meyer: Apposition in Contemporary English Jan Firbas: Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication Izchak M Schlesinger: Cognitive Space and Linguistic Case Katie Wales: Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English Laura Wright: The Development of Standard English, –: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts Charles F Meyer: English Corpus Linguistics: Theory and Practice Stephen J Nagle and Sara L Sanders (eds.): English in the Southern United States Anne Curzan: Gender Shifts in the History of English Kingsley Bolton: Chinese Englishes Irma Taavitsainen and Păaivi Pahta (eds.): Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English Elizabeth Gordon, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury and Peter Trudgill: New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution Raymond Hickey (ed.): Legacies of Colonial English Merja Kytăo, Mats Ryden and Erik Smitterberg (eds.): Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change John Algeo: British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns Christian Mair: Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization Evelien Keizer: The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization Raymond Hickey: Irish English: History and Present-Day Forms Găunter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlăuter (eds.): One Language, Two Grammars?: Differences between British and American English Laurel J Brinton: The Comment Clause in English Lieselotte Anderwald: The Morphology of English Dialects: Verb Formation in Non-standard English Change in Contemporary English A Grammatical Study   Lancaster University           Universităat Zăurich Albert-Ludwigs-Universităat Freiburg, Germany     University of Salford CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521867221 © Geoffrey Leech, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, Nicholas Smith, 2009 This publication is in copyright Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press First published in print format 2009 ISBN-13 978-0-511-64028-5 eBook (EBL) ISBN-13 978-0-521-86722-1 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate Contents List of figures List of tables Preface Abbreviations and symbolic conventions  Introduction: ‘grammar blindness’ in the recent history of English? . Grammar is more than an arbitrary list of shibboleths . Grammatical changes: proceeding slowly and invisible at close range? . A frame of orientation: previous research on recent and ongoing grammatical changes in English . Conclusion  Comparative corpus linguistics: the methodological basis of this book . (Computer) corpus linguistics: the Brown Corpus and after . Comparable corpora and comparative corpus linguistics . The methodological basis of comparable corpus linguistics . Stages of investigation (A) Rationalize the mark-up of the corpora (B) Undertake annotation of the corpora (C) Use search and retrieval software to identify and extract recurrent formal features in the corpus (D) Refine the comparative analysis (D) Derive difference-of-frequency tables (D) Derive difference-of-frequency tables from inter-corpus comparisons page x xiv xix xxiv                 v vi Contents (D) Undertake further categorization of instances of features found in the corpora (E) Further qualitative analysis, examining individual instances, or clusters of instances, in both corpora (F) Functional interpretation of findings . Further details and explanations of the stages of investigation .. (B) Annotation .. (C) Search expressions in CQP .. (D) Frequency across genres and subcorpora .. (D) External comparisons .. (D) Further categorization of instances found in the corpora .. (E) Further qualitative analysis .. (F) Functional interpretation of findings on all levels . Conclusion              The subjunctive mood . Introduction . The revival of the mandative subjunctive .. Overall developments of the mandative subjunctive .. Is the mandative subjunctive losing its formal connotations? . The were-subjunctive .. The were-subjunctive: diachronic development .. The were-subjunctive: a recessive formal option? . Revival and demise of the subjunctive? An attempt at reconciling apparently contradictory developments . Summary and conclusion     The modal auxiliaries . The declining use of the modal auxiliaries in written standard English –/ . The changing use of the modals in different genres and subcorpora . The changing use of the modals in spoken vs written corpora . The core modals and competing expressions of modality             Contents vii . Shrinking usage of particular modals: a more detailed examination .. The modals at the bottom of the frequency list: shall, ought to and need(n’t) .. The semantics of modal decline: may, must and should . Conclusion  The so-called semi-modals . Auxiliary–lexical verb gradience . Overall changes in frequency of semi-modals . Further evidence for grammaticalization? Phonetics and semantics .. Phonetic reduction and coalescence: gonna, gotta and wanna .. Signs of abstraction and generalization (semantic weakening) . The ecology of obligation/necessity . Conclusion              The progressive . Introduction . Basic and special uses of the progressive . Historical background . Overview of recent distribution patterns .. Distribution in written BrE and AmE .. Distribution in contemporaneous BrE speech and other registers . Present progressive active .. Quotations and contracted forms .. Stative verbs .. Subject type and reference .. Special uses . The progressive passive . The progressive in combination with modal auxiliaries .. Modal auxiliary + be -ing .. Will + be -ing . Summary and conclusion                   The passive voice . Introduction . The be-passive . The get-passive . The mediopassive . Summary and conclusion       viii Contents  Take or have a look at a corpus? Expanded predicates in British and American English . The state of the art . Hypotheses . Defining the variable . Results .. Stylistic variation .. Diachronic variation .. Regional variation . Summary  Non-finite clauses . Introduction: long-term trends in the evolution of English non-finite clauses . Changes in non-finite clauses I: case studies of individual matrix verbs .. Help + infinitive .. Prevent/stop + NP + (from) + gerund .. Start and stop in catenative uses .. Want to .. Assessing the speed of changes . Changes in non-finite clauses II: statistical trends in the tagged corpora . Conclusion  The noun phrase . Parts of speech: an overall survey . Nouns and noun sequences .. Common nouns .. Proper nouns, including proper nouns as acronyms . Noun sequences and other juxtapositions .. Noun + common noun sequences .. Noun sequences with plural attributive nouns .. Sequences of proper nouns . The s-genitive and the of-genitive .. The s-genitive .. The of-genitive . Relative clauses .. Wh- relative clauses .. That relative clauses .. Zero relative clauses .. Pied-piping vs preposition stranding . Summary and conclusion                                      328 References Nickel, Gerhard  ‘Complex verbal structures in English.’ International Review of Applied Linguistics , – [reprinted in Dietrich Nehls (ed.) Studies in Descriptive English Grammar Heidelberg: Julius Groos, , pp –] Nokkonen, Soili  ‘The semantic variation of NEED TO in four recent British corpora.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics , – Nu˜nez Pertejo, Paloma  The Progressive in the History of English: with Special Reference to the Early Modern English Period A Corpus Based Study Măunchen: Lincom Europa Oldireva Gustafsson, Larisa The passive in nineteenth-century scientific writing. In: Merja Kytăo, Mats Ryden and Eric Smitterberg (eds.) NineteenthCentury English Stability and Change Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – Olofsson, Arne  ‘A participle caught in the act: On the prepositional use of following.’ Studia Neophilologica , – Olsson, Yngve  On the Syntax of the English Verb with Special Reference to “have a look” and Similar Complex Structures (Gothenburg Studies in English ) Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell ă Overgaard, Gerd The Mandative Subjunctive in American and British English in the th Century (Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia ) Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis Palmer, Frank R   [] Modality and the English Modals London and New York: Longman  ‘Mood and modality: Basic principles.’ In: Keith Brown and Jim Miller (eds.) Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp –   [] Mood and Modality Cambridge: Cambridge University Press  ‘Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues.’ In: Facchinetti et al., pp – Pauwels, Anne  ‘Feminist language planning: Has it been worthwhile?’ at http://www.linguistik-online.de/heft_/pauwels.htm Linguistik online, / Viewed  April  Peters, Pam  ‘The survival of the subjunctive: Evidence of its use in Australia and elsewhere.’ English World-Wide (), –  ‘Paradigm split.’ In: Christian Mair and Marianne Hundt (eds.) Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME ) Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp –  The Cambridge Guide to English Usage Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Popper, Karl R   [] Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach Oxford: Clarendon Press Potter, Simeon   [] Changing English London: Deutsch Poutsma, Hendrik  A Grammar of Late Modern English For the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch, Students Pt , The Parts of Speech, Section , The Verb and the Particles Groningen: Noordhoff Pratt, Lynda and David Denison  ‘The language of the Southey-Coleridge circle.’ Language Sciences , – References 329 Prince, Ellen F  ‘A note on aspect in English: The take-a-walk construction. In: Senta Plăotz (ed.) Transformationelle Analyse Frankfurt/Main: Athenăaum, pp – Quirk, Randolph  Grammatical and Lexical Variance in English London: Longman Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik  A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language London and New York: Longman Quirk, Randolph and Jan Rusiecki  ‘Grammatical data by elicitation.’ In: John Anderson (ed.) Language Form and Linguistic Variation Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp Raab-Fischer, Roswitha Lăost der Genitiv die of-Phrase ab? Eine korpusgestăutzte Studie zum Sprachwandel im heutigen Englisch. Zeitschrift făur Anglistik und Amerikanistik , Radford, Andrew Transformational Grammar A First Course Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Rayson, Paul, Dawn Archer, Scott Piao and Tony McEnery  ‘The UCREL semantic analysis system.’ In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP Tasks, in association with the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC),  May,  Lisbon, pp – Rayson, Paul, Andrew Wilson and Geoffrey Leech  ‘Grammatical word class variation within the British National Corpus Sampler.’ In: Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.) New Frontiers of Corpus Research Papers from the Twenty First International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora – Sydney  Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp – Rensk´y, Miroslav  ‘English verbo-nominal phrases: Some structural and stylistic aspects.’ Travaux Linguistiques de Prague , – Rickford, John R., Norma Mendoza-Denton, Thomas A Wasow and Juli Espinoza  ‘Syntactic variation and change in progress: Loss of the verbal coda in topic restricting as far as constructions.’ Language , – Rinzler, Simone  ‘Pragmatique d’un genre: Communication institutionelle, monologisme et aspect passif.’ Anglophonia , – Rissanen, Matti  ‘The choice of relative pronouns in seventeenth century American English.’ In: Jacek Fisiak (ed.) Historical Syntax Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp –  ‘Syntax.’ In: Roger Lass (ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol : – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp Rohdenburg, Găunter Aspekte einer vergleichenden Typologie des Englischen und Deutschen: Kritische Anmerkungen zu einem Buch von John A Hawkins.’ In: Claus Gnutzmann (ed.) Kontrastive Linguistik Frankfurt, Bern, New York and Paris: Peter Lang, pp –  ‘On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English.’ English Studies , –  ‘Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English.’ Cognitive Linguistics , – 330 References  ‘The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system.’ In: Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Rittand and Herbert Schendl (eds.) Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt/Main and Wien: Peter Lang, pp – Romaine, Suzanne (ed.)  The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol IV: – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange  ‘The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech , Răomer, Ute Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins Rosenbach, Anette  Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter  ‘Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English. In: Găunter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds.) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp –  ‘On the track of noun+noun constructions in Modern English. In: Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe and Anja Măuller (eds.) Anglistentag  Bamberg Proceedings Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp – Rudanko, Juhani  Diachronic Studies of English Complementation Patterns Lanham, MD: University Press of America  Corpora and Complementation Lanham, MD: University Press of America  ‘Watching English grammar change: A case study on complement selection in British and American English.’ English Language and Linguistics , – Ryan, William M  ‘Pseudo-subjunctive were.’ American Speech , – Ryd´en, Mats  ‘Noun-name collocations in British English newspaper language.’ Studia Neophilologica , –  ‘On the panchronic core meaning of the English progressive.’ In: Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.) To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen Helsinki: Soci´et´e N´eophilologique, pp – Sadock, Jerrold M  Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts New York: Academic Press Sag, Ivan  ‘On the state of progress on progressives and statives.’ In: CharlesJames Bailey and Roger Shuy (eds.) New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp – Salton, Gerard  Automatic Text Processing Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Samuels, Michael  Linguistic Evolution With Special Reference to English Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Sankoff, David  ‘Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation.’ In Newmeyer, Frederick J (ed.) Linguistics The Cambridge Survey Vol : Language the SocioCultural Context Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – Sapir, Edward  Language An Introduction to the Study of Speech London: Harvest Books [original publisher Harcourt, Brace and World Inc.] Scheffer, Johannes  The Progressive in English Amsterdam: North-Holland References 331 Schlăuter, Julia The conditional subjunctive. In: Găunter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlăuter (eds.) One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp –  Schneider, Edgar W  ‘The subjunctive in Philippine English.’ In: Danilo T Dayag and J Stephen Quakenbusch (eds.) Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond A Festschrift in Honor of Ma Lourdes S Bautista Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, pp – Scott, Mike  WordSmith Tools Oxford: Oxford University Press Seoane, Elena a ‘Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English.’ In: Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt and Herbert Schendl (eds.) Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms English from – Bern: Peter Lang, pp – b ‘Information structure and word order change: The passive as an information-rearranging strategy in the history of English.’ In: Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds.) The Handbook of the History of English Oxford: Blackwell, pp – Seoane, Elena and Lucia Loureiro-Porto  ‘On the colloquialization of scientific British and American English.’ ESP Across Cultures , – Seoane, Elena and Christopher Williams  ‘Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse.’ In: Marina Dossena and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.) Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English Bern: Peter Lang, pp –  Seoane-Posse, Elena  ‘On the evolution of scientific American and British English, with special reference to recent and ongoing changes in the use of the passive voice.’ Paper presented at the th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, University of Glasgow, August, Serpollet, Noăelle The mandative subjunctive in British English seems to be alive and kicking Is it due to American influence?’ In: Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, Tony McEnery, Andrew Hardie and Shereen Khoja (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics  Conference Lancaster University: UCREL Technical Papers , –  Should and the Subjunctive: A Corpus-Based Approach to Mandative Constructions in English Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University Shibatani, Masayoshi  ‘Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis.’ Language (), – Sigley, Robert  ‘Text categories and where you can stick them: A crude formality index.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (), – Smith, Nicholas  ‘Ever moving on Changes in the progressive in recent British English.’ In: Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.) New Frontiers of Corpus Research Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp – a ‘Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English.’ In: Facchinetti et al., pp – b ‘A quirky progressive? A corpus-based exploration of the will + be + -ing construction in recent and present-day English.’ In: Dawn Archer, 332 References Paul Rayson and Andrew Wilson (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics  conference Lancaster University: UCREL Technical Papers , pp –   A Corpus-Based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University Smith, Nicholas and Paul Rayson  ‘Recent change and variation in the British English use of the progressive passive.’ ICAME Journal , – Smitterberg, Erik  The Progressive in th-Century English: A Process of Integration Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi Stein, Gabriele  ‘The phrasal verb type “to have a look” in Modern English.’ International Review of Applied Linguistics , – Stein, Gabriele and Randolph Quirk  ‘On having a look in a corpus.’ In: Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds.) English Corpus Linguistics Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, London: Longman, pp – Strang, Barbara M H  A History of English London: Routledge  ‘Some aspects of the history of the be+ing construction.’ In: John Anderson (ed.) Language Form and Linguistic Variation Papers Dedicated to Angus McIntosh Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp – Strunk, William, Jr and E B White   [] The Elements of Style New York: Longman Stubbs, Michael  Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture Oxford: Blackwell  ‘Texts, corpora and problems of interpretation: A response to Widdowson.’ Applied Linguistics (), – Sussex, Roland  ‘A note on the get-passive construction.’ Australian Journal of Linguistics , – Svartvik, Jan  On Voice in the English Verb The Hague and Paris: Mouton Svartvik, Jan and Randolph Quirk (eds.)  A Corpus of English Conversation (Lund Studies in English, Volume ) Lund: C W K Gleerup Sweetser, Eve  From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt  ‘Be going to vs will/ shall: Does syntax matter?’ Journal of English Linguistics , Taavitsainen, Irma and Păaivi Pahta Conventions of professional writing: The medical case report in a historical perspective.’ Journal of English Linguistics , – Taeymans, Martine  ‘An investigation into the marginal modals dare and need in British present-day English.’ In: Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds.) Up and Down the Cline The Nature of Grammaticalization Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp – Tagliamonte, Sali  ‘Have to, gotta, must? Grammaticalisation, variation and specialization in English deontic modality.’ In: Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), pp – Tognini-Bonelli, Elena  Corpus Linguistics at Work Amsterdam: Benjamins Tottie, Gunnel  Negation in Speech and Writing A Study in Variation San Diego: Academic Press  An Introduction to American English Oxford: Blackwell References 333  ‘How different are American and British English grammar? And how are they different? In: Găunter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlăuter (eds.) One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – Tottie, Gunnel and Sebastian Hoffmann  ‘Tag Questions in British and American English.’ Journal of English Linguistics (), – Traugott, Elizabeth Closs  A History of English Syntax New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston  ‘On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic changes.’ Language (), –  ‘Subjectification in grammaticalisation.’ In: Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation Linguistic Perspectives Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – Trudgill, Peter and Jean Hannah   [] International English A Guide to Varieties of Standard English London: Arnold Trudgill, Peter, Terttu Nevalainen and Ilse Wischer  ‘Dynamic have in North American and British Isles English.’ English Language and Linguistics (), – Turner, John F  ‘The marked subjunctive in contemporary English.’ Studia Neophilologica , – Urdang, Laurence  ‘“If I were a king ” I’d be in a subjunctive mood.’ Verbatim , – Ure, J M  ‘Lexical density and register differentiation.’ In: G E Perren and J L M Trim (eds.) Applications of Linguistics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – V´aradi, Tam´as  ‘The linguistic relevance of corpus linguistics.’ In: Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson, Tony McEnery, Andrew Hardie and Shereen Khoja (eds.) Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics  Conference Lancaster University: UCREL Technical Papers , pp – Varela P´erez, Jos´e Ram´on  ‘Negation of main verb have: Evidence of a change in progress in spoken and written British English.’ Neuphilologische Mitteilungen , – Visser, Fredericus Th – An Historical Syntax of the English Language  vols Leiden: E J Brill Vosberg, Uwe a ‘Cognitive complexity and the establishment of -ing constructions with retrospective verbs in Modern English.’ In: Marina Dossena and Charles Jones (eds.) Insights into Late Modern English Bern: Peter Lang, pp – b ‘The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In: Găunter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds.) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (Topics in English Linguistics .) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp – a Die Große Komplementverschiebung Außersemantische Einflăusse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergăanzungen im Neuenglischen Tăubingen: Narr b ‘The Great Complement Shift Extra-semantic factors determining the evolution of sentential complement variants in Modern English.’ In: English and American Studies in German  (Summaries of Theses and Monographs A Supplement to Anglia.) Tăubingen: Niemeyer, pp 334 References Warner, Anthony  ‘Predicting the progressive passive: Parametric change within a lexicalist framework.’ Language , – Weiner, E Judith and William Labov  ‘Constraints on the agentless passive.’ Journal of Linguistics (), – Wekker, Herman C  The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English Amsterdam: North-Holland Westin, Ingrid  Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi Westin, Ingrid and Christer Geisler  ‘A multi-dimensional study of diachronic variation in British newspaper editorials.’ ICAME Journal , – Wierzbicka, Anna  ‘Why can you have a drink when you can’t ∗ have an eat?’ Language , – Williams, Christopher  Non-progressive and Progressive Aspect in English Fasano di Puglia: Schena Editore Wright, Susan  ‘The mystery of the modal progressive.’ In: Dieter Kastovsky (ed.) Studies in Early Modern English Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp –  ‘Subjectivity and experiential syntax.’ In: Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation Linguistic Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp – Yoshimura, Kimihiro and John R Taylor  ‘What makes a good middle? The role of qualia in the interpretation and acceptability of middle expressions in English.’ English Language and Linguistics (), – Ziegeler, Deborah  ‘Agentivity and the history of the English progressive.’ Transactions of the Philological Society , – Index A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers xxi, , , , , , ,  ability ,  abstract nouns – abstraction  academic writing see also Learned subcorpus accelerating change  acronyms , ,  adjectives – adversative ,  advertising language  Aktionsart see aspect, progressive (aspect) American English xxiii, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , –, , , , , ,  and passim see also spoken English, American; written English, American American mass print media  American National Corpus , ,  Americanism ,  Americanization , , , , – analytical grammar  analyticization , – ANC – see American National Corpus annotation of corpora , ,  see also tags anti-colloquialization – apparent time , , ,  apposition ,  archaism  ARCHER see A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers articles  aspect , , ,  see also progressive (aspect) attributive adjectives ,  attributive nouns  plural – audience design  Australian English ,  automatic processing, automatic tagging , , –, – auxiliarization  auxiliary verbs –,  Baker, Paul xxii bar charts  Barber, Charles  bare infinitive  see also infinitive; to-infinitive Bauer, Laurie , – be able to , , –, ,  (be) going to , , , , –, , , , , , ,  be-passive , , , , , , ,  see also passive be supposed to , , ,  be to (semi-modal) , , , , , , ,  begin , ,  Biber, Douglas , , , , , , –,  see also Biber et al Biber et al () , , , , , , , ,  B-LOB Corpus xxi, , , , ,  BNC see British National Corpus BNCdemog , , ,  BNC Sampler Corpus brackets  Briticism , , ,  British English xxiii, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , –,  and passim British National Corpus (BNC) xxi, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,  broadcast discussion ,  broadcast interviews  Brown Corpus xix, , , , , , , ,  and passim Brown family of corpora, the xix–xxii, , , , –, , , , ,  and passim by-agents ,  335 336 Index Bybee, Joan L  Bybee et al ()  counterfactual  Crystal, David – C tagset ,  C tagset xxii, ,  Cambridge International Corpus (CIC) xxi can (modal auxiliary) , , ,  Canadian English  catenative verbs  Chafe, Wallace  change, determinants of – social processes of – Chomsky, Noam ,  CLAWS tagger xxii,  Coates, Jennifer ,  collocation  colloquial , , , , , ,  language  colloquialization , , , , , , , , , , , , , , –, , –,  colon  comma  common nouns ,  plural  comparable corpora, comparability xx, , , , , , , ,  comparison of adjectives – CONCE see Corpus of Nineteenth-Century English concordance  conditionals hypothetical  consistency of change  contemporaneous corpora ,  contractions ,  see also let us, let’s negative ,  verb ,  see also progressive, contracted forms convergent change , ,  conversation ,  conversion  co-referential  corpus linguistics , ,  and passim comparative – methodology Chapter  (passim),  diachronic comparative  short-term diachronic comparative , – Corpus of Nineteenth-Century English (CONCE) ,  Corpus of Spoken Professional American English  corrective coefficient ,  CQP software xxiii, , ,  could , ,  database ,  DCPSE see Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English decelerating change  definite article the ,  democratization , ,  Denison, David , , , , ,  densification , , –, , , , ,  deontic modality –, , , , , , ,  derived datasets  determiners  detransitivization  deverbal preposition – Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English xxi, , –, , , , , , , , , ,  DICE mini-corpus , –, , , , , , , , , , ,  different rates of change  difference-of-frequency tables – direct quotations  direct speech  see also quoted material distributional fragmentation  divergent change  do-support for have  drift ,  DSEU mini-corpus , –, , , , , , , , ,  dynamic modality  Early Modern English (EModE) , , , , , ,  economy  eighteenth century , , , ,  elicitation data , ,  empirical orientation epistemic modality –, , , , , ,  errors, tagging  exclamation mark ,  expanded predicate Chapter  (passim), , ,  aspectual difference  modification patterns  semantics of ,  face-to-face conversation see conversation Fairclough, Norman  features ,  Fiction subcorpora , , , , , ,  finite complement clauses  Index 337 first person pronouns –, , ,  Fitzmaurice, S see Wright, Susan F-LOB Corpus see Freiburg-LOB Corpus follow-my-leader ,  formal (vs functional) ,  formal (vs informal) , , ,  fossilization  Foster, Brian  Francis, Nelson , , , ,  Freiburg-Brown (Frown) Corpus xix, , ,  and passim Freiburg-LOB (F-LOB) Corpus xix, , , ,  and passim frequency adverbs  frequency changes xx,  frequency, decrease in  increase in  frequency per million words  Frown Corpus see Freiburg-Brown Corpus fiction ,  from-less gerund  full stop ,  functional analysis, functional explanations , , , – functional niche  future time expressions , ,  gender bias  General Prose subcorpora , , , ,  generalization, semantic , ,  generalized subject pronoun ,  genitive  genres xx, , , , , , , , , , , , ,  gerund , –, ,  gerundial clause , ,  get-construction, inchoative  get- passive , , , , , ,  gonna , –,  see also (be) going to gotta , , – see also (have) got to Government-and-Binding Theory  gradience, gradient , ,  grammar , ,  grammatical change  and passim grammaticalization , , –, , , , , , , , , , , , – granularity  Greenbaum, Sidney  group verbs  (had) better , , , , , , , , ,  have (main verb) constructed as auxiliary – contracted form  with do-support – (have) got to , , , , , , , –, , ,  have to , , , , , , , , –, ,  he, gender-neutral , – he or she , – help (verb)  help + infinitive , ,  Helsinki Corpus  horror aequi principle ,  Huddleston, Rodney  Huddleston and Pullum () , , , , ,  hypercorrection , , ,  hypothetico-deductive method  ICAME (International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English) xix ICAME Bibliography  ICE-GB see International Corpus of English – Great Britain in order that  in order to  indefinite article  Indian English ,  indicative , , , , ,  infinitive , –, , ,  see also bare infinitive; to-infinitive inflection  inflectional comparison – informal , , , , , , , , , , ,  see also colloquial; colloquialization informalization  see also colloquialization information density, informational orientation , , , , , ,  see also densification infrequent  inherent semantic properties  International Corpus of English–Great Britain , , , ,  interrogative clauses  Jamaican English  Jespersen, Otto , , , , , Johansson, Stig , Johnson, Samuel Kăonig, Ekkehard ,  Kuˇcera, Henry , ,  Labov, William  lag  Lancaster (±years) corpus  Lancaster (±years) corpus see B-LOB Corpus Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus xix, , , , ,  and passim 338 Index language contact  Late Modern English (LModE) , , ,  layering  LCSAE see Longman Corpus of Spoken American English Learned genre, Learned subcorpus , , , , , , , , , , ,  Lee, David  Leonard, Rosemary  let us, let’s – lexical density , –,  light verb , , ,  live commentaries  Ljung, Magnus  LLC see London Lund Corpus of Spoken English LOB Corpus see Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus London Lund Corpus of Spoken English,  London-Lund Corpus  Longman Corpus of Spoken American English (LCSAE) xxi, , , , , , ,  mail-order catalogue corpus  main verb – mandative subjunctive see subjunctive mark-up  matching corpora  see also comparable corpora matrix verbs ,  may , , , , , , –, , ,  permission ,  mayn’t  mediopassive ,  bare ,  semantics of  mental process verbs  methodology, comparable corpus ,  bottom up  Middle English , ,  might  mightn’t  Miss  modal auxiliaries, modals Chapter  (passim), , , , –, , , , ,  core –, , ,  frequency change –, –, , , , ,  marginal – monosemy, trend towards , , , – passive progressive  semantic categories – see also deontic modality; dynamic modality; epistemic modality; permission; possibility; volition modal idioms  modal periphrasis  modality , ,  Modern English , , ,  see also Early Modern English; Late Modern English mood ,  morphology  Moss´e, Fernand ,  Mr, Mrs  multi-word verbs  must , , , , , , , –, , , , –, ,  ‘authoritative’ sense –,  mustn’t  N+N sequences, N+CN sequences see noun-noun sequences names see personal names, proper nouns of organizations  of US presidents  narrative ,  necessity , , , – need to , , , , , , –, , , –, –, , , ,  need(n’t) , , , , , , –, ,  negative contractions – see also contractions New Zealand English ,  news reporting , , ,  see also Press subcorpora newspaper language see Press subcorpora NICE properties  nineteenth century , , , , , , , ,  no way  nominalization –,  non-finite clauses  non-finite verbs Chapter  (passim),  non-progressive see progressive: vs non-progressive non-standard language  not-negation and no-negation – nouns , ,  see also common nouns; proper nouns; titular nouns noun phrase Chapter  (passim), ,  noun–noun sequences , , –, , ,  long sequences – noun + common noun sequences –,  proper – Index 339 ‘nouniness’, nominal style –,  see also densification -n’t see negative contractions object  obligation , , , , –,  OED xxi, , , ,  of (preposition)  of-genitive , , –, ,  of-phrases ,  Old English , , , , ,  ought to , , , , –, , , ,  oughtn’t to  Oxford English Dictionary see OED Oxford Text Archive xix Palmer, F R , ,  paradigmatic atrophy ,  parallel change ,  part-of-speech annotation/tagger/tagging/tags xxii, ,  participles  adjectival  verbal  parts of speech –, ,  passive (voice) Chapter  (passim), , , , , , , , , , ,  see also be- passive;get- passive; progressive: passival, progressive passive prescriptive avoidance of  text linguistic function of  past perfect passive progressive  pattern meaning , ,  period see full stop permission, permissibility , ,  personal names –,  phonetic reduction –, ,  phrasal verbs  pied-piping construction –, ,  plural  PN+PN see noun–noun sequences, proper Popper, Karl  popularization , ,  POS see part-of-speech possibility , , ,  post-editing ,  Potter, Simeon  precision  prepositions , ,  preposition stranding –,  prescription, prescriptive, prescriptivism , , , , , , , , , , , , ,  in the USA  Present-Day English (PDE) , , , ,  present perfect passive progressive  Press subcorpora , , , , , –, ,  prestige barrier , ,  prevent + NP + (from) + gerund  progressive (aspect/construction) Chapter  (passim), , , , , , , , , , , , , ,  always-type , , ,  contracted forms , ,  frequency , , ,  futurate use , , , , , , ,  interpretive use , , , , , ,  meanings ,  see also progressive: special uses modal + progressive , , ,  origins ,  paradigm , , , , ,  participial progressive  passival progressive ,  past progressive , ,  present progressive , , , , , , , , , , ,  progressive passive , , , , , ,  quoted vs non-quoted usage , ,  special uses , , , ,  subjects , , , ,  vs non-progressive , , , , , , ,  will + be -ing , , , ,  with stative verbs , , , , ,  pronouns , ,  see also progressive: subjects proper nouns –,  proper noun sequences – Pullum, Geoffrey K  punctuation –,  purported change  purpose clause  qualitative analysis , , , – quantitative analysis , , ,  question mark  questions – non-sentential – tag – Quirk et al () – quotative go and be like  quoted material , – see also progressive: quoted vs non-quoted usage real-time diachronic corpus ,  re-analysis  340 Index recall  redundancy  regionally-specific change ,  register ,  see also genres regular expression  relative clauses , , , , –, –,  relative pronoun , , ,  non-finite  non-restrictive ,  restrictive , ,  representativeness ,  responsibility  cline of result clause Rohdenburg, Găunter , root modality see deontic modality Rosenbach, Anette ,  Sapir, Edward , –,  science fiction  scientific discourse  Scottish English  search and retrieval software  second-person pronouns ,  semantic bleaching  semantic categories of modals – semantic weakening , ,  semi-auxiliaries  semi-colon  semi-modals Chapter  (passim), , , , , –, –, , , ,  sentence length  SEU see Survey of English Usage s-genitive , , , , , , –, , ,  shall , , , , –, , ,  future , ,  prescriptive use of  stipulative sense  shan’t  she or he – should , , , , –, , , , ,  weak inference/obligation , – Smitterberg, Erik , , ,  so that  sociolinguistic globalization – sociolinguistics ,  split infinitives , , – spreadsheet ,  spoken English, spoken language , , , , , , –, , , , , , , ,  see also conversation American –, , – see also American English British , –, , , , , , , ,  see also British English start ,  start/stop + gerund –,  stop + NP + (from) + gerund  Strang, Barbara M H , , , , ,  stretched verb constructions  style ,  style guides , ,  style marker  subcorpus, subcorpora , , , , – subject  subjunctive (mood) Chapter  (passim),  active  demise of  mandative , , , –, , ,  passive  remnants  revival , , , ,  subordinate clauses  suffixes  support verb constructions  Survey of English Usage  syncretism ,  syntactic variables  tagger xxii,  see also part-of-speech tagger tags  see also part-of-speech tags tagset , – telephone conversation  see also conversation Template Tagger xxii,  text category, text type , , , , , ,  see also genres text sample xx that relativization, that relative clauses –, –, ,  That Rule  they, singular use , , , – titular nouns  to-infinitive ,  see also bare infinitive; infinitive Traugott, Elizabeth  United States see American English USAS semantic tagging software  used to  variable, definition of ,  variation diachronic ,  regional , , , , , , ,  register  Index 341 voice (active and passive)  volition , , –,  wanna , , –,  see also want to want to , , , , –, , , ,  we, generic use  web-based corpus linguistics  wh-complement clause – wh- pronouns – wh- relativization, wh- relative clauses , –, , , ,  which (relative pronoun) –, , ,  who , ,  whom , , , –,  will (modal auxiliary) , , , , , , ,  see also progressive: will + be -ing women’s movement  word classes see parts of speech frequency  word-formation  WordSmith Tools  World Wide Web, the xxii would , ,  would rather  Wright, Susan , ,  written English, written language xx, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,  American , – see also American English British , –,  see also British English you, generic use  zero relativization, zero relative clauses , –, –,  Zwicky, Arnold  ... tables Table A? ??.b Table A? ??. Table A? ??.? ?a Table A? ??.b Table A? ??.? ?a Table A? ??.b Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??.? ?a Table A? ??.b Table A? ??. Table A? ??.? ?a Table A? ??.b Table A? ??. Table A? ??.? ?a. .. tables xvii Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??. Table A? ??.... has made clear in his magisterial study of grammatical change in nineteenth- and twentieth-century English, practically all grammatical change involves a gradual and statistical element during

Ngày đăng: 18/02/2021, 11:24

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Cover

  • Half-title

  • Series-title

  • Title

  • Copyright

  • Contents

  • Figures

  • Tables

  • Preface

  • Abbreviations and symbolic conventions

  • 1 Introduction: 'grammar blindness’ in the recent history of English?

    • 1.1 Grammar is more than an arbitrary list of shibboleths

    • 1.2 Grammatical changes: proceeding slowly and invisible at close range?

    • 1.3 A frame of orientation: previous research on recent and ongoing grammatical changes in English

    • 1.4 Conclusion

    • 2 Comparative corpus linguistics: the methodological basis of this book

      • 2.1 (Computer) corpus linguistics: the Brown Corpus and after

      • 2.2 Comparable corpora and comparative corpus linguistics

      • 2.3 The methodological basis of comparable corpus linguistics

      • 2.4 Stages of investigation

      • 2.5 Further details and explanations of the stages of investigation

        • 2.5.1: (B) Annotation

        • 2.5.2: (C) Search expressions in CQP

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan