56 Digital Television

Tzou, K. “Digital Television” Digital Signal Processing Handbook Ed. Vijay K. Madisetti and Douglas B. Williams Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 1999 c  1999byCRCPressLLC 56 Digital Television Kou-Hu Tzou Hyundai Network Systems 56.1 Introduction 56.2 EDTV/HDTV Standards MUSE System • HD-MAC System • HDTV in North America • EDTV 56.3 Hybrid Analog/Digital Systems 56.4 Error Protection and Concealment FEC • Error Detection and Confinement • Error Concealment • Scalable Coding for Error Concealment 56.5 Terrestrial Broadcasting Multipath Interference • Multi-Resolution Transmission 56.6 Satellite Transmission 56.7 ATM Transmission of Video ATM AdaptationLayerfor Digital Video • Cell Loss Protection References 56.1 Introduction Digital television is being widely adopted for various applications ranging from high-end applica- tions, such as studio recording, to consumer applications, such as digital cable TV and digital DBS (Direct Broadcasting Satellite) TV. For example, several digital video tape recording standards, using component format (D1 and D5), composite format (D2 and D3), or compressed component formats (Digital Betacam) are commonly used by broadcasters and TV studios [1]. These standards preserve the best possible picture quality at the expense of high data rates, ranging from approximately 150 to 300 Mbps. When captured in a digital format, the picture quality can be free from degradation dur- ing multiple generations of recording and playback, which is extremely attractive to studio editing. However, transmission of these high data-rate signals may be hindered due to lack of transmission media with an adequate bandwidth. Although it is possible, the associated transmission cost will be very high. The bit rate requirement for high definition television (HDTV) is even more demanding, which may exceed 1 Gbps in an uncompressed form. Therefore, data compression is essential for economical transmission of digital TV/HDTV. Before motion-compensated DCT coding technology became mature in recent years, transmission of high-quality digital television used to be carried out at 45 Mbps using DPCM techniques. Today, by incorporating advanced motion-compensated DCT coding, comparable picture quality can be achieved at about one-third of the rate required by DPCM-coded video. For entertainment applica- tions, the requirement on picture quality can be relaxed a little bit to allow more TV channels to fit into the same bandwidth. It is generally agreed that 3 to 4 Mbps for movie-originated or low-activity interlaced video (talk shows, etc.) materials is acceptable, and 6-8 Mbps for high-activity interlaced video (sports, etc.) is acceptable. The targeted bit rate for HDTV transmission is usually around c  1999 by CRC Press LLC 20 Mbps, which is chosen to match the available digital bandwidth of terrestrial broadcast channels allocated for conventional TV signals. 56.2 EDTV/HDTV Standards The concept of HDTV system and efficient transmission format was originally explored by researches atNHK (JapanBroadcastingCorp.) morethan 20 years ago[2] inorder to offersuperior picture qual- ity while conserving bandwidth. Main HDTV features, including more scan lines, higher horizontal resolution, wider aspect ratio, better color representation, and higher frame rate, were identified. With these new features, HDTV is geared to offer picture quality close to that of 35-mm prints. However, the transmission of such a signal will require a very wide bandwidth. During the last 20 years, intensive research efforts have been engaged toward video coding to reduce bandwidth. Currently there are two dominant HDTV production formats being used worldwide; one is the 1125-line/60-Hz system primarily used in Japan and the U.S. and the other is the 1250-line/50-Hz system primarily used in Europe. The main scanned raster characteristics of these two formats are listed in Table 56.1. The nominal bandwidth of the luminance component is about 30 MHz (in some cases, 20 MHz was quoted). Roughly speaking, the HDTV signal can carry about six times as much information as a conventional TV signal. TABLE 56.1 Main Scanned Raster Characteristics of the 1125-line/60-Hz System and the 1250-line/50-Hz System Total scan lines Active lines Scanning Aspect Format per frame per frame format ratio Field rate 1 1125 1035 2:1 interlaced 16:9 60.00/59.94 2 1250 1152 2:1 interlaced 16:9 50.00 Development of HDTV transmission techniques in the early days was focused on bandwidth- compatible approaches that use the same analog bandwidth as a conventional TV signal. In some cases, in order to conserve bandwidth or to offer compatibility with an existing conventional signal or display, a compromised system—Enhanced or Extended Definition TV—was developed instead. The EDTV signal does not offer the picture quality and resolution required for an HDTV signal; however, it enhances the picture quality/resolution of conventional TV. 56.2.1 MUSE System The most well-known early development in HDTV coding is the MUSE (Multiple Sub-Nyquist Sampling Encoding) system at NHK [3, 4]. The main concept of the MUSE system is adaptive spatial-temporal subsampling. Since human eyes have better spatial sensitivity for stationary or slow-moving scenes, the full spatial resolution is preserved while the temporal resolution is reduced for these scenes in the MUSE system. For fast moving scenes, the spatial sensitivity of human eyes declines so that reducing the spatial resolution will not significantly affect perceived picture quality. The MUSE signal is intended for analog transmission with a baseband bandwidth of 8.1 MHz, which can be fitted into a satellite transponder for a conventional analog TV signal. However, it should be noted that most signal processing employed in the MUSE system is in the digital domain. The MUSE coding technique was later modified to reduce bandwidth requirement for transmission over 6-MHz terrestrial broadcasting channels (Narrow-MUSE) [5]. Currently, MUSE-based HDTV programming is being broadcast regularly through a DBS in Japan. c  1999 by CRC Press LLC 56.2.2 HD-MAC System A development similar to the MUSE was initiated in Europe as well. The system, HD-MAC (High- DefinitionMultiplexedAnalogComponent), isalso based onthe concept ofadaptivespatial-temporal subsampling. Depending on the amount of motion, each block, consisting of8×8 pixels, is classified into either the 20-, 40-, or 80-ms mode [6]. For a fast-moving block (the 20-ms mode), it is transmitted at the full temporal resolution, but at 1/4 spatial resolution. For a stationary or slow- moving block (the 80-ms mode), it is transmitted at full spatial resolution, but at 1/4 temporal resolution (25/4 frames/sec). For the 40-ms block, it is transmitted at half spatial and half temporal resolutions. The mode associated with each block is transmitted as side information through a digital channel at a bit rate nearly 1 Mbps. The subsampling process of the HD-MAC system is illustrated in Fig. 56.1, where the numbers indicate the corresponding fields of transmitted pixels and the “·” indicates a pixel not transmitted. FIGURE 56.1: Adaptive spatial-temporal subsampling of the HD-MAC system. (a) The 80-ms mode for stationary to very-slow moving scenes, (b) the 40-ms mode for medium-speed moving scenes, and (c) the 20-ms mode for fast moving scene. 56.2.3 HDTV in North America HDTV development in North America started much later than that in Japan and Europe. The Advisory Committee on Advanced Television Services (ACATS) was formed in 1987 to advise Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the facts and circumstances regarding advanced television systems for terrestrial broadcasting. The proposed systems in early days were all intended for analog transmission [7]. However, the direction of U.S. HDTV development took a 180-degree turn in 1990 since General Instrument (GI) entered the U.S. HDTV race by submitting an all-digital HDTV system proposal to the FCC. The final contender in the U.S. HDTV race consisted of one analog system (Narrow-MUSE) and four digital systems, which all employed motion compensated DCT coding. Extensive testings on the five proposed systems were conducted in 1991 and 1992 and the testing concluded that there are major advantages in the performance of the digital HDTV systems and only the digital system shall be considered as the standard. However, none of these four digital systems was ready to be selected as the standard without implementing improvements. Withthe encouragement fromACATS, the four U.S. HDTV proponents formed the Grand Alliance (GA) to combine their efforts for developing a better system. Two HDTV scan formats were adopted by the GA. The main parameters are shown in Table 56.2. The lower-resolution format, 1280 × 720, is only used for progressive source materials while the high-resolution format, 1920 × 1080, can be used for both progressive and interlaced source materials. The digital formats of GA HDTV are carefully designed to accommodate the square-pixel feature, which provides better interoperability with digital video/graphics in the computer environment. Since the main structure of MPEG-2 c  1999 by CRC Press LLC system and video coding standards were settled at that time and the MPEG-2 video coding standard provides extension to accommodate HDTV formats, the GA adopted MPEG-2 system and video coding (Main Profile (MP) at High Level (HL)) standards for the U.S. HDTV, instead of creating another standard [8]. However, the GA HDTV adopted the AC-3 audio compression standard [9] instead of the MPEG-2 Layer 1 and Layer 2 audio coding. TABLE 56.2 Main Scanned Raster Characteristics of the GA HDTV Input Signals Active Active lines Scanning samples/line per frame format Aspect ratio Frame rate 60.00/59.94 1280 720 1:1 progressive 16:9 square pixels 30/29.97 24/23.976 30/29.97 1920 1080 1:1 progressive 16:9 square pixels 24/23.976 1920 1080 2:1 interlaced 16:9 square pixels 30/29.97 56.2.4 EDTV EDTV refers to the TV signal that offers quality between the conventional TV and HDTV. Usually, EDTV has the same number of scan lines as the conventional TV, but offers better horizontal res- olution. Though it is not a required feature, most EDTV systems offer a wide aspect ratio. When the compatibility with a conventional TV signal is of concern, the additional information (more horizontal details, side panels, etc.) required by the EDTV signal is embedded in the unused spatial- temporal spectrum (called spectrum holes) of the conventional TV signal and can be transmitted in either an analog or digital form [10, 11]. When the compatibility with the conventional TV is not required, EDTV can use the component format to avoid the artifacts caused by mixing of chromi- nance and luminance signals in the composite format. For example, several MAC (Multiplexed Analog Component) systems for analog transmission were adopted in Europe for DBS and cable TV applications [12, 13]. Usually, these signals offer better horizontal resolution and better color fidelity. There were many fully digital TV systems developed in the past. These systems that used adequate spatial resolution and higher bit rates were likely to achieve superior quality to the conventional TV and were qualified as EDTV [14]. Nevertheless, an efficient EDTV system is already embedded in the MPEG-2 video coding standard. Within the context of the standard, the 16:9 aspect ratio and horizontal and vertical resolutions exceeding the conventional TV can be specified in the “Sequence Header”. When coded with adequate bit rates, the resulting signal can be qualified as EDTV. 56.3 Hybrid Analog/Digital Systems Today, existing conventional TV sets and other home video equipment represent a massive invest- ment by consumers. The introduction of any new video system that is not compatible with the existing system may face strong resistance in initial acceptance and may take a long time to penetrate households. One way to circumvent this problem during the transition period is to “simulcast” a program in both formats. The redundant conventional TV, being simulcast in a separate channel, can be phased out gradually when most households are able to receive the EDTV or HDTV signal. Intuitively, a more bandwidth efficient approach may be achieved if the transmitted conventional TV signal can be incorporated as a baseline signal and only the enhancement signal is transmitted in an additional channel (called “augmentation channel”). In order to facilitate the compatibility, c  1999 by CRC Press LLC an analog conventional TV signal has to be transmitted to allow conventional TV sets to receive the signal. On the other hand, digital video compression techniques may be employed to code the enhancement signals in order to accomplish the best compression efficiency. Such systems belong to the category of hybrid analog/digital system. A generic system structure for the hybrid analog/digital approachis shown in Fig. 56.2. Due tothe interlacing processing used in TV standards, thereare some unused holes in the spatial-temporal spectrum [15], which can be used to carry partial enhancement components as shown in Fig. 56.2. FIGURE 56.2: A generic hybrid analog digital HDTV coding system. The Advanced Compatible Television System II (ACTV-II), developed by the consortium of NBC, RCA, and the David Sarnoff Research Center during the U.S. ATV standardization process, is an example of a hybrid system. The ACTV-II signal uses a 6-MHz channel to carry an NTSC compat- ible ACTV-I signal and uses an additional 6-MHz channel to carry the enhancement signal. The ACTV-I consists of a main signal, which is fully compatible with the conventional NTSC signal, and enhancement components (luminance horizontal details, luminance vertical-temporal details, and side-panel details of the wide-screen signal), which are transmitted in 3-D spectrum holes of the NTSC signal. The differences between the input HDTV signal and the ACTV-I signal are digitally coded using 4-band subband coding. The digitally coded video difference signal and digital audio signal require a total bandwidth of 20 Mbps and are expected to fit into the 6-MHz bandwidth by using the 16-QAM modulation. The enhancement components of the ACTV-I signal are digitally processed (time expansion and compression) and transmitted in an analog format. Nevertheless, they could be digitally compressed and transmitted, which would result in a hybrid analog/digital ACTV-I signal. For users with conventional TV sets, conventional TV pictures (4:3 aspect ratio) will be displayed. For users with an ACTV-I decoder and a wide screen (16:9) TV monitor, the wide- screen EDTV can be viewed by receiving the signal from the main channel. For those who have an ACTV-II decoder and an HDTV monitor, the HDTV picture can be received by using signals from both the main channel and the associated augmentation channel. The HDS/NA system developedby Philips Laboratories is another example of hybridanalog/digital system where the augmentation signal is carried in a 3-MHz channel [16]. The augmentation signal consists of side panels to convert the aspect ratio from 4:3 to 16:9, and high-resolution spatial components. The side panels from two consecutive frames are combined into one frame of panels and are intraframe compressed by using DCT coding with a block size of 16 × 16 pixels. Both the horizontal and vertical high-resolution components are also compressed by intraframe DCT coding with some modifications to take into account the characteristics of these signals. The augmentation signals result in a total bit rate of 6 Mbps, which is expected to fit into a 3-MHz channel using modulation schemes with efficiency of 2 bits/Hz. However, the HDS/NA system was later modified intoananalogsimulcastsystem, HDS/NA-6, whichoccupiesonlya6-MHz bandwidth andis intended c  1999 by CRC Press LLC to be transmitted simultaneously with a conventional TV in a taboo channel. The augmentation-based hybrid analog/digital approach may be more efficient than the simulcast approach when both conventional TV and HDTV receivers have to be accommodated at the same time. However, for the augmentation-based approach, the reconstruction of the HDTV signal relies on the availability of the conventional TV signal, which implies that the main channel carrying the conventional TV signal can never be eliminated. Due to the inefficient use of bandwidth by the conventionalanalog TV signal, the overall bandwidth efficiency of the hybrid analog/digital approach is inferior to that of the fully digital-based simulcast approach. Furthermore, the system complexity of the hybrid approach is likely to be higher than that of the fully digital approach because it requires both analog and digital types of processing. 56.4 Error Protection and Concealment Video coding results in a very compact representation of digital video by removing its redundancy, which leaves the compressed data very vulnerable to transmission errors. Usually, a single transmis- sion error will only affect a single pixel for uncompressed data. However, due to the coding process employed, such as DCT transform and motion-compensated inter-field/frame prediction, a single transmission error may affect a whole block or blocks in consecutive frames. Furthermore, variable length coding is extensively used in most video coding systems, which is even more susceptible to transmission errors. For variable-length coded data, a single bit error may cause the decoder to lose track of codeword boundaries and results in decoding errors in subsequent data. Generally speaking, a single transmission error may result in noticeable picture impairment if no error concealment is applied. 56.4.1 FEC The first effort to protect the compressed digital video in an environment susceptible to transmission errors should be to reduce transmission errors by employing forward error correction (FEC) coding. FEC adds redundancy, just opposite to data compression, in order to protect the underlying data from transmission errors. One trivial FEC example is to transmit each bit repeatedly, say three times. A single bit error in each three transmitted bits can be easily corrected by a majority-vote circuit. There are many known FEC techniques which can achieve much better protection without devoting too much bandwidth to redundancy. Today, two types of FEC codes are popularly used for digital transmission over various media. One is Reed-Solomon (RS) code, which belongs to the class of block codes. The other is the convolutional code, which usually operates on continuous data. The RS code appends a number of redundant bytes to a block of data to achieve error correction. Usually2n redundant bytes can correctup to n byte errors. Whena higher level protection is required, more redundant bytes can be attached or alternatively the redundant bytes can be added to shorter data blocks. For digital transmission using the MPEG-2 transport format, in order to maintain the structure of the MPEG-2 transport packets, the (204,188) RS code has been particularly chosen by many standards, which appends 16 redundant bytes to each MPEG-2 transport packet. On the other hand, the U.S. GA-HDTV chose the (207,187) RS code, where the RS redundancy computation is based on the 187-byte data block with the sync byte excluded. The convolutional code is a powerful FEC code, which generates m output bits for every n input bits. The code rate, r,isdefinedasr = n/m. The output bits are not only determined by the current input bits, but also depend on previous input bits. The depth of the previous input data affecting the output is called the constraint length, k. The output stream of the convolutional code is the result of a generator function convolved with the input stream. Viterbi decoding is an efficient algorithm to decode convolutionally coded data. The complexity of the Viterbi algorithm is proportional to c  1999 by CRC Press LLC 2 k . Therefore, longer constraint length results in higher decoding complexity. However, longer constraint length also improves FEC performance. A lower rate convolutional code provides more protection at the expense of higher redundancy. For a r = 1/2 and k = 7 convolutional code, a BER of 10 −2 canbereducedtobelow10 −5 . In order to maintain nearly error-free transmission, a very low BER has to be achieved. For example, if an average error-free interval of two hours needs to be achieved for a 6-Mbps compressed bit stream, the required BER is 2.3 × 10 −11 . For some transmission media that have limited carrier- to-noise ratio, such a low BER may not be achievable using the RS code or convolutional code alone. However, an extremely powerful coding can be accomplished by concatenating the RS code and the convolutional code, where the RS code (called outer code) is used toward the source or sink side and the convolutional code (called inner code) is used toward the channel side. An interleaver to spread bursts of errors is usually used between the inner and outer code in order to improve error correction capability. The interleaver needs to be carefully designed so that the locations of the sync byte in the ATM packets remain unchanged through the interleaver. A block diagram of the concatenated RS code and convolutional code is shown in Fig.56.3. Some simulations showed that satisfactory performance can be achieved by using the concatenate codes for digital video transmission over the satellitelink [17]. In[17], the overall BER is about 2 −11 , which corresponds to a BER of about 2·10 −4 using the convolutional code only. FIGURE 56.3: Block diagram of concatenated RS code and convolutional code. 56.4.2 Error Detection and Confinement While FEC techniques can improve BER significantly, there are still chances that errors may occur. As mentioned earlier, a single bit error may cause catastrophic effects on compressed digital video if pre- caution is not exercised. To avoid the infinite error propagation, one needs to identify the occurrences of errors and to confine the errors during decoding. Due to the use of variable length coding, a single bit error in the compressed bit stream may cause the decoder to lose track of codeword boundaries. Even though the decoder may regain code synchronization later, the number of decoded data may be more or less than the actual number of samples transmitted, which will affect proper display of the remaining samples. To avoid error propagation, compressed data need to be organized into smaller self-contained data units with unique words to identify the beginning or boundaries of the data unit. In case transmission errors occur in preceding data units, the current data unit can still be properly decoded. In the MPEG-2 video coding standard, the slice is the smallest self-contained data unit, which has a unique 32-bit slice start code and information regardingits location within a picture [18]. Therefore, a transmission error in one slice will not affect the proper decoding of subsequent slices. c  1999 by CRC Press LLC However, for inter-field/frame coded pictures, the artifacts in the error-contaminated slice will still propagate to subsequent pictures, which use this slice as reference. Error concealment is a technique to mitigate artifacts caused by transmission errors in the reconstructed picture. 56.4.3 Error Concealment For DCT-based video coding, some analytic work was conducted in [19] to derive an optimal re- construction method based on received blocks with missing DCT coefficients. The solution consists of three linear interpolation in the spatial, temporal, and frequency domains from the boundary data, reconstructed reference block, and received DCT block, respectively. When the complete block is missing, the optimal solution becomes a linear combination of a block replaced by the corre- sponding block in the previous frame and a spatially interpolated block from boundary pixels. This method needs to go through an iterative processto restore damaged data when consecutive blocks are corrupted by errors. The above concealment technique was further improved in [20, 21] by incorpo- ratingan adaptive spatial-temporalinterpolationschemeanda multi-directionalspatial interpolation scheme. When a temporal concealment scheme is used, the picture quality in the moving area can be improved by incorporating a motion compensation technique The motion vector for a missing or corrupted macroblock can be estimated from the motion vectors of surrounding macroblocks. For example, the motion vector can be estimated based on the averaged motion vector from the macroblocks above and below the underlying block, as suggested in the MPEG-2 video standard. However, when the neighboring reference macroblocks are intra-coded, there are no motion vectors associated with these macroblocks. The MPEG-2 video coding standard allows transmission of the “concealment motion vectors” associated with intra-coded macroblocks, which can be used to estimate the motion vector for the missing or corrupted macroblock. 56.4.4 Scalable Coding for Error Concealment When the requirement of error-free transmission cannot be met, it may be useful to provide different protection of underlying data according to the visual importance of the compressed data. This will be useful for transmission media which have different delivery priorities or provide different levels of FEC protection for underlying data. The data that can be used to reconstruct basic pictures are usually treated as high-priority data while the data used to enhance the pictures are treated as low- priority data. For these visually important data, high redundancy is used to offer more protection (or high priority in a cell-based transport system). Therefore, the high-priority data can always be reliably delivered. On the other hand, any errors in the low-priority data will only result in minor degradation. Therefore, if any error is detected in the low-priority data, the affected data can be discardedwithoutsignificantlydegrading thepicturequality. Nevertheless, if concealment techniques by spatial-temporal interpolation as described above can be applied to affected areas, this will further improve picture quality. The scalable source coding processes the underlying signal in a hierarchical fashion according to the spatial resolution, temporal resolution, or picture signal-to-noise ratio, and organizes the compressed data into layers so that a lower-level data set can be used to reconstruct a basic video sequence and the quality can be improved by adding higher levels. Many coding systems can offer the scalable coding feature if the underlying data is carefully partitioned [22, 23]. The MPEG-2 video coding standard also offers scalable extension to accommodate spatial, temporal, and SNR scalability. c  1999 by CRC Press LLC 56.5 Terrestrial Broadcasting InconventionalanalogTV standards, in orderto allow low-costTV receiverstoacquirethecarrier and subcarrier frequencies easily, the transmitted analog signals always contain these two frequencies in high strength, which are the potential cause for co-channel and adjacent-channel interferences. This problembecomes more prominentin the terrestrial broadcasting environment,where the transmitter of an undesired signal (adjacent channel) may be much closer than that of a desired signal. The strong undesired signal may interfere with the desired weak signal. Therefore, some of the terrestrial broadcasting channels (taboo channels) are prohibited in the same coverage area in order to reduce the potential interference. In digital TV transmission, the power spectrum of the signal is widespread over the allocated spectrum, which substantially reduces the potential interference. On the other hand, the bandwidth efficiency of digital coding may significantly increase the capacity of terrestrial broadcasting. Therefore, digital video coding is a very attractive alternative to solving the channel congestion problem in major cities. 56.5.1 Multipath Interference Onenotoriousimpairment oftheterrestrial broadcastingchannelisthemultipathinterference, which manifests as the ghost effect in received pictures. Fordigital transmission, the multi-path interference will cause signal distortion and degrade system performance. An effective way to cope with multipath interference is to use adaptive equalization, which can restore the impaired signal by using a known training data sequence. The GA HDTV system for terrestrial broadcasting adopted this method to overcome the multipath problem [9]. A very different approach—Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (COFDM)— has been advocated in Europe for terrestrial broadcasting [10]. The COFDM technology employs multiple carriers to transport parallel data so that the data rate for each carrier is very low. The COFDM system is carefully designed to ensure that the symbol duration for each carrier is longer than the multipath delay. Consequently, the effect of multipath interference will be significantly reduced. The carrier spacing of the COFDM system is carefully arranged so that each subcarrier is orthogonal to the other subcarriers, which achieves high spectrum efficiency. A performance simulation of COFDM for terrestrial broadcastingwas reportedin [24], which indicated that COFDM is a viable alternative to digital transmission of 20 Mbps in a 6-MHz terrestrial channel. 56.5.2 Multi-Resolution Transmission In terrestrial broadcasting, the carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the received signal decreases gradually when the distance between a receiver and the transmitter increases. In an analog transmission system, the picture quality usually degrades gracefully when the CNR decreases. In a digital transmission system, a lower CNR will result in a higher BER and the decoded picture contaminated by errors may become unusable when the BER exceeds a certain threshold. A technique to extend the coverage area of terrestrial broadcasting is to use scalable source coding in conjunction with multiresolution (MR) channel coding [25, 26]. In MR modulation, the constellation of the modulated signal is carefully organized in a hierarchical fashion so that a low-density modulation can be derived from the constellation with high protection while a high-density modulation can be achieved by further demodulation of the received signal. An example of MR modulation using QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) is shown in Fig. 56.4, where the nonuniform constellation represents 4- QAM/16-QAM MR modulation. The scalable source coding processes the underlying signal in a hierarchical fashion according to the spatial resolution, temporal resolution, or picture signal-to- noise ratio, and organizes the compressed data in layers so that a lower-level data set can be used to reconstruct a basic video sequence and the quality can be improved by adding more levels. The MPEG-2 video coding standard also offers scalable extension to accommodate spatial, temporal, c  1999 by CRC Press LLC [...]... Processing Workshop, Torino, Italy, 1988 [7] Hopkins, R., Advanced televisions systems, IEEE Trans Consumer Electronics, 34(1), 1-15, Feb 1988 [8] United States Advanced Television Systems Committee, Digital Television Standard for HDTV Transmission, Doc A/53, April 12, 1995 [9] United States Advanced Television Systems Committee, Digital Audio Compression (AC-3), Doc A/52, 1994 [10] Isnardi, M et... widely used for digital satellite TV broadcasting and being adopted by the Digital Audio-Visual Interactive Council (DAVIC) for the set-top box standard, MPEG-2-based scalable coding in conjunction with the MR modulation likely will be used to offer graceful degradation in terrestrial broadcasting if it is desired FIGURE 56. 4: The constellation of a MR modulation for a 4-QAM/16-QAM 56. 6 Satellite Transmission... as a candidate for real-time digital video applications However, the AAL5 was adopted by the ATM Forum as the standard for Audiovisual Multimedia Services (AMS) [29] The standard process of ATM is undertaken by several international standard bodies such as ATM Forum, and International Telecommunication Union–Transmission (ITU-T) Study Groups (SG) 9, 13, and 15 For digital television transmission, the... Schreiber, W.F., Advanced television systems for terrestrial broadcasting: some problems and some proposed solutions, Proc IEEE, 83(6), 958-981, June 1995 [26] deBot, P.G.M., Multiresolution transmission over the AWGN Channel, Technical Reports, Philips Labs., Eindhoven, The Netherlands, June 1992 c 1999 by CRC Press LLC [27] EBU/ETSI JTC, Draft Digital Broadcasting System for Television, Sound and Data... antenna/LNB and Integrated Receiver/Decoder (IRD) falls below U.S $600 today and is expected to decline gradually Furthermore, due to advances in digital video compression technology, the capacity of the satellite transponder has been increased substantially Today, digital TV with 100 or more channels per satellite is being broadcast in North America In an analog satellite transmission system, the baseband... recover the 27MHz clock at the receiving end There are several key parameters in designing an AAL for digital video, which include packaging efficiency, complexity, error handling capability and performance, and PCR jitter When AAL1 is employed, each MPEG-2 TS packet is mapped into 4 ATM cells as shown in Fig 56. 6(a) A 1-byte AAL1 header is inserted into the first payload byte of each ATM cell The AAL1 header... offers sequence integrity to detect lost cells The most attractive factor of AAL5 is the wide support of major service and equipment vendors c 1999 by CRC Press LLC FIGURE 56. 6: Mapping MPEG-2 TS packets into AAL PDU (a) AAL-1 and (b) AAL5 56. 7.2 Cell Loss Protection In the ATM environment, cells may be corrupted due to transmission errors or lost due to traffic congestion The transmission bit error rate... This BER is far from the targeted quality of service for compressed digital video As discussed earlier, concatenated inner and outer codes are very effective for satellite communications, which can reduce the BER to below 10−12 from 10−4 Recently, European Broadcasting Union (EBU) launched a project intended to set a standard for digital video transmission over satellite, cable, and Satellite Master... Consumer Electronics, 34(1), 128-136, Feb 1988 [13] Garault, T et al., A digital MAC decoder for the display of a 16/9 aspect ratio picture on a conventional TV receiver, IEEE Trans Consumer Electronics, 34(1), 137-146, Feb 1988 [14] Jalali, A et al., A component CODEC and line multiplexer, IEEE Trans Consumer Electronics, 34(1), 156- 165, Feb 1988 [15] Fukinuki, T and Hirano, Y., Extended definition TV... [16] Tsinberg, M., Compatible introduction of HDTV: The HDS/NA system, Proc 3rd Intl HDTV Signal Processing Workshop, Torino, Italy, 1989 [17] Cominetti, M and Morello, A., Direct-to-home digital multi-programme television by satellite, Proc Intl Broadcasting Convention, 358-365, Sept 16-20, 1994 [18] ISO/IEC IS 13818-2/ITU-T Recommendation H.262, Information technology— generic coding of moving picture . Press LLC, 1999 c  1999byCRCPressLLC 56 Digital Television Kou-Hu Tzou Hyundai Network Systems 56. 1 Introduction 56. 2 EDTV/HDTV Standards MUSE System •. Transmission of Video ATM AdaptationLayerfor Digital Video • Cell Loss Protection References 56. 1 Introduction Digital television is being widely adopted for