Therefore, according to IEC 61803 (Determination of power losses in HVDC converter stations), the loss calculation models of converter station equipment under operation and standby mode are established in detail alongside the datasheet parameters of the devices.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 10, Issue 12, December 2019, pp 512-526, Article ID: IJMET_10_12_049 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=12 ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359 © IAEME Publication EVALUATION OF THE LOSS PROFILES OF VSC-BASED HVDC CONVERTERS Gbadega Peter A Department of Electrical Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, King George V Avenue, Durban, 4041, South Africa Inambao Freddie L Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, King George V Avenue, Durban, 4041, South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9922-5434 perosman4real1987@yahoo.com, Inambaof@ukzn.ac.za ABSTRACT Voltage source converter based high-voltage direct current systems (VSC-HVDCs) are often used in transmission and distribution regions and accomplish good operating results They are popular due to the recent innovation of controllable semiconductor devices and bulk power transmission for long distances of about 500 km and above However, the loss contributions of VSC-HVDC systems are relatively high compared to the traditional LCC-based HVDCs, which tends to be the main hurdle to the application of VSC-HVDC to high power transmission Thus, the loss characteristics of VSC warrants further investigation In this paper, the loss calculations of two level and three level VSC-based HVDC technologies are studied and corresponding loss reducing measures are obtained from the results An essential step in the thermal management design of the power electronic devices, in this case, an insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and diode, is required for accurate calculation of both conduction and switching losses of these devices In order to achieve optimized designs, tools are needed for accurate prediction of device junction temperature and power dissipation Therefore, according to IEC 61803 (Determination of power losses in HVDC converter stations), the loss calculation models of converter station equipment under operation and standby mode are established in detail alongside the datasheet parameters of the devices Keywords: HVDC, power losses, VSC, datasheet parameters, IGBT, diode, conduction losses, switching losses Cite this Article: Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L, Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 10(12), 2020, pp 512-526 http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=12 http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 512 editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters INTRODUCTION The evaluation of power losses involves analysis and computation of losses that occur during the operation of a system in order to assist designers and operators in evaluating the technical and economic advantages of the project It is necessary for the supplier to gain knowledge of how and where the losses are generated in order to determine the equipment ratings and subsequently increase the operating efficiency of the transmission system by optimizing the design of the equipment that generates the losses [1, 2] Power loss evaluation during the design stage of VSC-based HVDC technology is imperative because this permits the designers to enhance the overall system performance through a compromise of various design indices The losses of the overall VSC-based HVDC link can generally be computed as the sum of the individual equipment losses on the network The loss contributions of various components of the converter stations are calculated separately The overall losses are mainly the separate losses of each piece of equipment [1, 3] Loss determination of various equipment is based on available standards However, these standards are mainly used for LCC-based HVDC links, therefore, in order to determine the losses occurring in a VSC-based HVDC installation more research has to be conducted to establish similar standards to perfectly determine the losses in a VSC HVDC scheme However, the existing standards can be used to calculate the power losses in VSC-based HVDC technology The losses related to voltage source converters account for a large proportion of the total losses of the converter stations due to the low voltage level and high switching frequency features of voltage source converters [4] A method was proposed in [5] which presents an analytical method to calculate the efficiency of VSC-HVDC links based on two-level and three-level VSCs The method uses the average and root mean square of the VSC converter current to estimate the conversion losses in the converter (conduction and switching losses) Additionally, the studies in [6] verified the feasibility, technical as well as economic, of VSC HVDC on loss minimization in mesh networks The losses of the different components of a VSC HVDC link were studied and the impact of the installation on overall system losses in mesh networks was verified through simulations This paper is organized in the following way: Section describes the overview of losses of VSC-based HVDC technologies; Section describes the results and analyses of power loss calculations of VSC-based HVDC technologies (two level and three level configurations); Section concludes the study VSC-BASED VALVE LOSSES Figure shows the loss hierarchy of VSC-based converter valves which are mainly from insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) and freewheeling diodes In order to implement loss evaluation, the losses of converter valves are segmented into various parts, as depicted in Figure Output characteristics curves are used to calculate the IGBT and Freewheeling Diode (FWD) steady state losses and are calculated based on the collector voltage-current characteristics in a transient state The conduction and switching losses of an IGBT device generates about half of the converter valve, and the switching losses of the FWD generates about one-third of the entire energy dissipation An infinite proportion of losses results from the other parts of the module [7] The proportion of the IGBT device and converter losses tend to reduce as the converter operates in the rectifier state because the current flows through the FWD most of the time, therefore, its losses are usually less than that of the IGBTs’ Changing of the operating states and structure of the valves will usually have an effect on the converter valve losses [8] The essential aspects to consider are topology of converter, types of the converter valve, scheme of valve driver, valve unit accessories, and temperature of the device http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 513 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L Turn-on Losses Switching losses Turn-off Losses IGBT steady state losses (conduction losses) Total losses of IGBT model Transient losses (reverse recovery) FWD Total losses of converter valve unit Steady state Losses(conduction losses) Voltage divider Total losses of accessories Heat sink Driver unit Other facilities Figure Classification of losses in a VSC-based converter valve unit [3] The main contributor to the overall VSC-based HVDC losses are the valve losses The valves composed of IGBTs and diodes are collectively known as an IGBT module In an IGBT module there are various IGBTs and diodes based on the module and the application requirements When conducting or switching from one state to another, all chips dissipate power However, it is expedient to consider each of the devices that make up the valve [8, 9] 2.1 Power Losses Evaluation of Two-Level VSC-Based HVDC Technology 2.1.1 Estimating Power Losses of IGBTs In thermal design, the first step is the computation of total power losses An IGBT is a voltage-controlled device, which merges the merits of a Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) and a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) IGBT is a three-terminal device, collector, emitter and the gate terminal For high power IGBT module operation it is mandatory to provide a suitable heatsink otherwise it may go into thermal runaway In power electronics circuits which adopt the use of IGBTs it is imperative to consider the two most important sources of power dissipation, namely, conduction losses and switching losses, since IGBTs operate in two states and produce losses in both states, [10, 11] 2.1.1.1 Conduction Losses of IGBTs The losses in an IGBT module that occur during the On-state of the IGBT or freewheeling diode when current is being conducted are known as conduction losses The dissipated total power is estimated by multiplying the On-state saturation voltage and On-state current (current flowing through the collector or anode) In order to obtain the average power dissipation, the conduction losses, in PWM applications, must be multiplied by the duty factor The first order approximation of conduction losses can be obtained by multiplying the IGBT saturated voltage drop (Vce sat) by the expected average device current [12] Conduction loss is the On-state loss or steady state loss The average power dissipated by the IGBT is expressed as: ∫ [ http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 514 ( ) ( )] editor@iaeme.com (1) Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters Where: Average conduction losses, in W Vce = the device forward voltage or On-state saturation voltage (IGBT), in Volts = On-state current, in Ampere T = Conduction period, in seconds The forward resistance can easily be computed from the IGBT characteristic curve from the datasheet provided by the manufacturer (2) Description as above Forward resistance is the ratio between the collector-emitter voltage difference and the collector current difference The value of ( ) is computed as follows [13, 14]: ( ) (3) Substituting the expression for the forward voltage in Eq (3) into Eq (1) yields: (4) Where: = Average current through the device during conduction period, in Ampere = rms current through the device during conduction period, in Ampere The average and rms current through the device during conduction period are estimated as follows: ∫ ( ) (5) ∫ ( ) (6) Note that, the value obtained from Eq (3) should be approximately equal with the value in the datasheet to justify the correct computation from the graph However, the average power losses in PWM sine wave switching is expressed as [15]: ( ) ( ) (7) Where = modulation index = power factor = Peak value of sinusoidal output current, in Ampere Other descriptions as above 2.1.1.2 Switching Losses of IGBTs Switching losses in power electronic devices usually contribute a substantial amount to the overall losses of the system Thus, ignoring losses due to switching of the electronic devices in the computation of or weighting of the losses due to conduction of the devices with an estimated factor to actually consider switching losses, might lead to large errors Regarding the total losses, the power dissipated during the turn On and turn Off switching transitions are known as switching losses Switching losses are calculated as the total sum of on-state switching losses and turn-off switching losses, so depend on the switching frequency, device http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 515 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L current and device characteristics Switching losses happen as a result of energy loss during the transition and switching frequency These losses are also related to the dc link voltage, load current and junction temperature If the switching frequency is higher, losses will likewise be higher [3, 16] It is essential to estimate the switching accurately in order to compute the junction-temperature time behavior so that the reliability of the design can be improved To evaluate the average switching power losses it is necessary to obtain the and values from the curve at the expected average operating current Therefore, the average power dissipated is expressed as: ( ) (8) Based on the conditions provided for any application with respect to the datasheet nominal values, the switching power loss is required to be normalized ( ) (9) Total losses is expressed as: (10) Where: = IGBT turn on switching energy at and T = 125 = IGBT turn off energy loss at and T = 125 PWM switching frequency IGBT saturation voltage drop at and T = 125 Peak value of sinusoidal output current 2.1.2 Estimating Power Losses of Freewheeling Diodes In power electronics, a diode is a two-terminal pn-junction device whose two terminals are anode and cathode It is an electronic device which allows current to pass when it is forward biased in one direction (conduction state), and blocks current in the opposite direction (reverse direction) 2.1.2.1 Conduction Losses of Diodes The average total power losses in a diode is expressed as: (11) The forward resistance can easily be computed from the diode characteristic curve from the datasheet provided by the manufacturer (12) From Eq (12) the value of diode resistance can be obtained from change of forward voltage and forward current The forward voltage of a diode is expressed as: (13) Similarly, diode threshold voltage can be computed from the characteristic diode graph, which is then used for estimating the forward voltage as shown in Eq (13) This forward voltage can be checked against the value on the datasheet to confirm the validity of the calculation The average power losses in a diode when operating under PWM sinewave switching is expressed as: http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 516 editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters ( ) ( ) (14) Parameters description as above 2.1.2.2 Reverse Recovery Losses of Diodes Basically, when switching a diode from the conduction mode to the blocking state, a diode or rectifier tends to have stored charge which must be discharged first, prior to when the diode blocks the reverse voltage This discharge takes a limited amount of time known as Reverse Recovery Time, or During this time, diode current may drift in the reverse direction When the device (diode) turns off as a result of the discharging operation, which still permits the drifting action of the diode current in the reverse direction, losses are generated which is called recovery loss The time needed to recover is called reverse recovery time The recovery losses of a diode is expressed as: (15) Where: = Diode reverse recovery energy (The turn-off energy of the diode due to reverse recovery current) = Switching frequency = Diode reverse recovery current = Diode reverse recovery charge = Diode reverse recovery time As previously stated, based on the conditions provided for any application with respect to the datasheet nominal values, the switching power loss is required to be normalized (16) Finally, the summation of Eq (14) and Eq (16) results in Eq (11) Therefore, the sum of conduction loss and reverse recovery loss in a diode results in the total average power loss for the diode Similarly, the average (total) conduction losses of a per valve IGBT module is expressed as: [ ] (17) [ ] (18) Note that in a two-level converter, the total conduction and switching losses for the 6valves becomes: [ ] [ ] (19) (20) Where: = Number of IGBTs connected in series in each valve The number of IGBTs connected in series in each, valve is expressed as: ( http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 517 ) ( ) editor@iaeme.com (21) Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L Where: = Voltage factor = Switching safe operating area voltage factor = Voltage miss distribution = Switching safe operating area voltage factor for IGBTs 2.2 Power Losses Evaluation of Three-Level VSC-Based HVDC Technology 2.2.1 Conduction Losses The conduction losses consist of losses in the IGBTs and the freewheeling diodes However, the conduction losses for each switch can be estimated by the following expression: (22) Consequently, in a three-level converter configuration, there are four IGBTs and six diodes in each phase The load current and the phase leg voltage are the same as the two-level configuration However, the duty cycle across the switching devices is expressed as follows [4, 17]: , , (23) Therefore, the average and rms currents that flow in the IGBT follows: and [( ∫ ) [ ∫ are expressed as ] (24) ] (25) Where: = The peak of the output voltage, in Ampere = The phase difference between the output voltage and current = Modulation index Similarly, the currents for and are expressed as [4]: *∫ *∫ [ + ∫ + ∫ ] (26) [ ( ] (27) ) Likewise, the average and rms currents that flow in the freewheeling diodes are expressed as: [ ∫ ∫ http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 518 [ ] (28) ] (29) editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters Similarly, the average and rms currents that flow in the clamped diodes are expressed as: *∫ [( + ∫ ] ) (30) *∫ [ + ∫ ] (31) Subsequently, the above listed formulas can be used in Eq (22) to compute the total conduction per valve of IGBT module 2.2.2 Switching Losses Practically, there are only two commutations per output in IGBTs and , so, therefore, the switching losses of these IGBTs are usually excluded However, an ideal case is being considered in this research work, so the switching losses are computed for a qualitative analysis Furthermore, the switching losses in the IGBTs to for a three-level neutral point clamped converter are expressed as: ∫ ∫ ( ) [ ] (32) ( ) [ ] (33) The switching losses of the diodes (considering the fact that there is only switch off energy i.e recovery energy) can be obtained using Eq (16) 2.3 Power Losses Estimation in the DC-Link Capacitor The ESR (equivalent series resistance) value and the current through the capacitor can be used to determine the DC-link capacitor losses Similarly, the ESR values can be obtained from the capacitor datasheet, and the current can be estimated with the assistance of charging and discharging times of the capacitor using the SKN 130 capacitor datasheet When the charge and discharge current are estimated, the current that drifts through the capacitor can be evaluated from the expression of charge and discharge currents [18, 19] as follows: √ (34) Where = rms value of charging current = rms value of discharging current Most of the power losses associated with the converter valve occurs in the switches, but there are also some power losses in the DC-link capacitor The total power loss of the valve is expressed as [20]: [ ] (35) 2.4 Evaluation of the Average Junction Temperature Conduction and switching power losses are expected to surface when operating the power device contained in IGBT and intelligent power modules Therefore, the heat generated due to these losses has to be dissipated away from the power chips and the environment using a heat sink; the power device will over-heat if an adequate thermal system is not adopted, which http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 519 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L could lead to module failure However, the system thermal design in many applications is limited by the maximum useable power output of the module Thus, in order to gain maximum output from the device, it is essential to accurately design the thermal system [21], [22] The junction temperature is expressed as: [ ( ) ( ) ( )] (36) Where = Junction temperature = Module power loss ( ) = Thermal Resistance junction to case ( )= ( ) Thermal Resistance case to heat sink = Thermal Resistance heat sink to ambient RESULTS AND ANALYSES OF LOSSES CALCULATION OF VSCBASED HVDC CONVERTERS The purpose of this study is to calculate the loss mechanisms of the popular VSC-based HVDC technologies, with two-level and three-level converter configuration The total loss figure of the these VSC-based technologies are calculated based on the summation of individual loss components, and the individual component losses are determined by applying standardized calculation methods 3.1 Power Losses Estimations in Two-Level VSC-Based HVDC Converters Table System Parameters Components Transformer rating Actual value Rectifier side Inverter side 500/440 kV, 1000 350/230 kV MVA 2Ω 2Ω Transformer resistance Transformer 55.5 mH 55.5 mH reactance Coupling reactor 41.8 mH 41.8 mH VSC converter rating 1000 MVA 1000 MVA DC cable resistance 0.05 Ω/km (500 0.05 Ω/km (500 km long) = 25 Ω km long) = 25 Ω 2800 V 2000 V DC link voltage 561.64 kV 561.51 kV 300 300 (number of IGBTs connected in series) Number of valves at 6 each station http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 520 editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters Table Datasheet parameters for Dynex IGBT module DIM1200ASM45-TS000 Input S 2800 V 1000 Rectifier side = 1312.16 A MVA 440 kV Inverter side = 1649.57 A √ √ Rectifier side = 1855.7 A Switching frequency Converter Power factor Modulation index (m) Ambient Temp DATASHEET DIM1200ASM45-TS000 Case temperature= = 125 IGBT ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ( unless stated otherwise DIODE ( ) 6.45 4.65 1200 2800 1.44 0.001677 0.008 0.006 0.014 )( /W) ) ( /W) ) ( /W) Inverter side = 2332.84 A KHz 0.85 0.856 60 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ( )( /W) ) ( /W) ) ( /W) 3.75 1200 2800 1.79 0.001167 0.016 0.006 0.022 Tables and show the system parameters and the conduction and switching data for Dynex IGBT module DIM1200ASM45-TS000 used for power losses calculation for two level converter topology and PWM sinewave switching Table Losses Calculations of two-level converter HVDC system Results Power conduction losses in IGBT (W) Power switching losses in IGBT (W) Total Power losses in IGBT (W) Power conduction losses in Diode (W) Power switching losses in Diode (W) (Reverse recovery energy loss) Total Power losses in Diode (W) Total Power losses per IGBT module (W) IGBT / FREEWHELING DIODE Rectifier terminal Inverter terminal 1836.45 W 2686.11 W 5463.86 W 4906.24 W 7300.31 W 7592.35 W 418.32 W 1845.9 W 587.92 W 1657.51 W 2264.22 W 2245.43 W 9564.54 W 9837.78 W [ Table shows the results of the calculation of conduction and switching losses of an IGBT and diode for two-levels using the standardized equations stipulated above http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 521 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L Total power losses at the converter station terminals Losses[W] 20000000 15000000 10000000 5000000 Total losses per module Total power losses for 300 series connected 6-valve Losses comparison IGBT modules Rectifier side Inverter side Figure Total losses at the converter station terminals Figure shows the calculations of total power losses of a 300-series connected 6-valve IGBT modules Note that, using the values on table II in Eq (21), the number of series connected IGBTs is calculated to be 300 Therefore, the overall total power losses of the IGBT module is obtained by multiplying the number of series connected IGBTs with the total losses per IGBT module, which results in 17.22 MW at the rectifier terminal and 17.71 MW at the inverter terminal From the calculation, it is obvious that the power losses at the inverter terminal are higher than those at the rectifier terminal, so therefore, the loss contributions of the inverter terminal are higher than those of the rectifier terminal Table Charge and discharge currents, ESR, losses per unit and total loss In the calculation of total loss, the number of capacitors used in two-level VSC HVDC is Configuration ( ) ( ) ( ) ESR (mΩ) Loss/unit (W)= Total Losses(W) Two-Level VSCconfiguration Table shows the required parameters needed to compute the total losses of a DC-link capacitor The rms current was obtained using Eq (34) The rms value of charging current of the capacitor, , rms value of discharging current of the capacitor, and the equivalent series resistance value are readily available in the SKN 130 capacitor datasheet The number of capacitors in a two-level configuration is always in number When the configuration of DC-link capacitance is considered, the total losses of capacitors are estimated to be 672 W in two-level configuration Most of the power losses associated with the converter valve occur in the switches, but there is also some power loss in the DC-link capacitor The total power loss of the valve was calculated including the DC link capacitor total losses using Eq (35) The results were 17.221 MW and 17.711 MW for the rectifier and inverter station terminals respectively http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 522 editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters Total power losses per device (W) Analysis Losses[W] 8000 IGBT 6000 DIODE 4000 2000 Converter station terminals Figure Chart representation of the overall total power losses per device at each converter terminals Figure shows the chart illustration of the loss calculations of the overall power losses per IGBT module including DC link capacitor losses at both the rectifier terminal and inverter terminal of a two-level VSC HVDC technology Table Calculations of junction temperature of both IGBT and freewheeling diode Results IGBT FREEWHEELING DIODE Junction Rectifier Inverter Rectifier Inverter terminal temperature, terminal terminal terminal ( ) 315.5 325.74 139.25 138.6 Table shows the calculations of junction temperature, , of both IGBT and freewheeling diode at both converter terminals These results were obtained using Eq (36) Note that most of the equation parameters are readily available on the device datasheets 3.2 Power Losses Estimations in Three-Level VSC-Based HVDC Converters Table Calculations of the IGBT conduction power losses of the both terminals of the three-level converter stations Results Total IGBT conduction Losses ( (W)) Switching loss Total IGBT Switching power Losses ( Rectifier terminal Inverter terminal Rectifier terminal Inverter terminal 344.53 A 433.12 A 535.22 kA 845.83 kA 1393.69 W = 2042.15 W 2787.38 W = 4084.3 W Rectifier terminal: 7344.16 W Rectifier terminal 583.71 A 733.79 A 857.391 kA 1354.98 kA 2278.39 W = 3328.96 W 4556.78 W = 6657.92 W Inverter terminal: 10742.22 W Inverter terminal Rectifier terminal Inverter terminal 5054.071 W = 4538.27 W = 10108.14 W 9076.54 W Rectifier terminal: 409.79 W = 367.968 W = 819.58 W 735.936W Inverter terminal: 10927.72 W 9812.476 W http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 523 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L (W)) Total Power losses in IGBT (W) Average current For Diodes 18271.88 W Rectifier terminal Inverter terminal Rectifier terminal Clamped diodes 6.981 A Conduction Losses in Diode Total Diode conduction Losses ( (W)) Diode switching Loss Total conduction Power losses per IGBT module (W) 20554.696 W 8.776 A 10.544 kA 24.8 W = 99.2 W Rectifier terminal: 1707.4 W 239.174 A 16.663 kA 35.155 W = 140.62 W Inverter terminal Clamped diodes 300.674 A 322.176 kA 509.152 kA 804.1 W = 1132.38 W = 1608.2 W 2264.7 W Inverter-terminal: 2405.38 W 1845.90 W = 11075.4 W 9051.56 W 1657.51 W = 9945.06 W 13147.6 W [ Total switching Power losses per IGBT module (W) 22003.12 W 19757.536 W [ Total power losses for 100 series connected IGBT modules including the DC-link capacitor losses ( ) ( ) ( ) 9.317 MW 9.872 MW Table Charge and discharge currents, ESR, losses per unit and total loss In the calculation of total losses, the number of capacitors used in three-level VSC HVDC is Configuration ( ) ( ) ESR (mΩ) ( ) Loss/unit Total (W)= Losses(W) Three-Level VSCconfiguration Table shows the results of the power losses calculations of the principal losses of VSCbased converters at both station terminals, which are made up of IGBTs and the freewheeling diodes The equation used in the analyses are all listed above Table shows the required parameters needed to compute the total losses of DC-link capacitor The rms current was obtained using Eq (34) The rms value of charging current of the capacitor, , rms value of discharging current of the capacitor, and the http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 524 editor@iaeme.com Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC-Based HVDC Converters equivalent series resistance value are readily available in the SKN 130 capacitor datasheet The number of capacitors in a three-level configuration are always in number Moreover, when the configuration of DC-link capacitance is considered, the total losses of capacitors are estimated to be 517 W in three-level configuration Most of the power losses associated with the converter valve occur in the switches, but there are also some power losses in the DC-link capacitor The total power loss of the valve was calculated including the DC link capacitor total losses using Eq (35) The results were 9.317 MW and 9.872 MW for the rectifier and inverter station terminals respectively CONCLUSION This work accounts for the evaluation of the loss profiles of VSC-based HVDC converter technologies Firstly, the various power loss evaluation methods of two-level and three-level converters HVDC technologies were discussed in detail with the equations required to compute those principal losses of VSC-based HVDC technologies in order to have knowledge regarding power losses evaluation of VSC-based technologies Subsequently the various equations were used individually to calculate the losses of these technologies at both converter station terminals From the results obtained, the two-level VSC-based configuration has the highest loss contribution to the transmitted power on a typical electrical network REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] IEEE "IEEE Recommended Practice for Determination of Power Losses in High-Voltage Direct-Current (HVDC) Converter Stations." IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, 1991 P Gbadega and A Saha, "Loss Assessment of MMC-Based VSC-HVDC Converters Using IEC 62751-1-2 Std and Component Datasheet Parameters," in 2018 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 2018, pp 1-9 DOI: 10.1109/PowerAfrica.2018.8521180 Bahrman M P and Johnson, B K The ABCs of HVDC Transmission Technologies IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 5, 2007, pp 32-44 DOI: 10.1109/MPAE.2007.329194 P Gbadega and A Saha, "Loss Study of LCC-Based HVDC Thyristor Valves and Converter Transformers Using IEC 61803 Std and Component Datasheet Parameters," in 2018 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 2018, pp 32-37 DOI: 10.1109/PowerAfrica.2018.8521016 Pang, H., Tang, G and He, Z Evaluation of Losses in VSC-HVDC Transmission System In Power and Energy Society General Meeting-Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, 2008 IEEE, 2008, pp 1-6 DOI: 10.1109/PES.2008.4596740 Ikonen, M., Laakkonen, O and Kettunen, M Two-Level and Three-Level Converter Comparison in Wind Power Application Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2005 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.590.4221&rep=rep1&type=pdf A G Peter and K A Saha, "Power losses assessments of LCC-based HVDC converter stations using datasheet parameters and IEC 61803 STD," in 2018 International Conference on the Domestic Use of Energy (DUE), 2018, pp 1-10 DOI: 10.23919/DUE.2018.8384394 Kalcon, G., Adam, G P., Anaya-Lara, O., Burt, G and Lo, K Analytical Efficiency Evaluation of Two and Three Level VSC-HVDC Transmission Links International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 44, 2013, pp 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.018 http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 525 editor@iaeme.com Gbadega Peter A and Inambao Freddie L [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] Daelemans, G., Srivastava, K., Reza, M., Cole, S and Belmans, R Minimization of Steady-State Losses in Meshed Networks Using VSC HVDC In Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009 PES'09 IEEE, 2009, pp 1-5 DOI: 10.1109/PES.2009.5275450 Andersen, B Xu, L., Horton, P and Cartwright, P Topologies for VSC Transmission Power Engineering Journal, 16, 2002, pp 142-150 DOI: 10.1049/pe:20020307 Casanellas, F Losses in PWM Inverters Using IGBTs IEE Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, 141, 1994, pp 235-239 DOI: 10.1049/ip-epa:19941349 Bierhoff M H and Fuchs, F W Semiconductor Losses in Voltage Source and Current Source IGBT Converters Based on Analytical Derivation In Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2004 PESC 04 2004 IEEE 35th Annual, 2004, pp 2836-2842 DOI: 10.1109/PESC.2004.1355283 Hosseini K and Mahler, J Semiconductor Device Comprising a Semiconductor Chip Stack and Method for Producing the Same Google Patents, 2011 Meier, S., Norrga, S and Nee, H.-P New Voltage Source Converter Topology for HVDC Grid Connection of Offshore Wind Farms Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/071c/cc101fa5dead1e5405a5a2416eb8eeb724b9.pdf Drofenik U and Kolar, J W General Scheme for Calculating Switching-and ConductionLosses of Power Semiconductors in Numerical Circuit Simulations of Power Electronic Systems In Proceedings of the 2005 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC’05), Niigata, Japan, April, 2005, pp 4-8 Blaabjerg, F., Jaeger, U and Munk-Nielsen, S Power Losses in PWM-VSI Inverter Using NPT or PT IGBT Devices IEEE Transactions on power electronics, 10, 1995, pp 358367 DOI: 10.1109/63.388002 Kim, T.-J., Kang, D.-W., Lee, Y.-H and Hyun, D.-S The Analysis of Conduction and Switching Losses in Multi-Level Inverter System," in Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2001 PESC 2001 IEEE 32nd Annual, 2001, pp 1363-1368 DOI: 10.1109/PESC.2001.954310 Yazdani A and Iravani, R Voltage-Sourced Converters in Power Systems: Modeling, Control, and Applications New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010 Negra, N B., Todorovic, J and Ackermann, T "Loss Evaluation of HVAC and HVDC Transmission Solutions for Large Offshore Wind Farms," Electric Power Systems Research, 76, 2006, pp 916-927 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.11.004 Tehrani, K A., Rasoanarivo, I and Sargos, F.-M Power Loss Calculation in Two Different Multilevel Inverter Models (2DM 2) Electric Power Systems Research, 81, 2011, pp 297-307 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.09.005 AboElHassan, M A., Kamel, S and Ebeed, M Simple Modeling of HVDC Systems into Newton-Raphson Load Flow Algorithm In Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), 2016 Eighteenth International Middle East, 2016, pp 832-836 DOI: 10.1109/MEPCON.2016.7836991 Lee, S.-G., Kang, D.-W., Lee, Y.-H and Hyun, D.-S The Carrier-Based PWM Method for Voltage Balance of Flying Capacitor Multilevel Inverter In Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2001 PESC 2001 IEEE 32nd Annual, 2001, pp 126-131 DOI: 10.1109/PESC.2001.954006 http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 526 editor@iaeme.com .. .Evaluation of the Loss Profiles of VSC- Based HVDC Converters INTRODUCTION The evaluation of power losses involves analysis and computation of losses that occur during the operation of a... is to calculate the loss mechanisms of the popular VSC- based HVDC technologies, with two-level and three-level converter configuration The total loss figure of the these VSC- based technologies... Power Losses Evaluation of Three-Level VSC- Based HVDC Technology 2.2.1 Conduction Losses The conduction losses consist of losses in the IGBTs and the freewheeling diodes However, the conduction losses