Tài liệu tham khảo |
Loại |
Chi tiết |
2. Hoang Trong, C. N. M. N., 2008. Thong ke ung dung trong Kinh te - Xa hoi. Hanoi: Statistics |
Sách, tạp chí |
Tiêu đề: |
Thong ke ung dung trong Kinh te - Xa hoi |
|
3. Khang, K., 2017. Doanh nghiệp nào thống trị thị trường bia Việt. [Online]Available at: https://www.brandsvietnam.com/14149-Doanh-nghiep-nao-thong-tri-thi-truong-bia-Viet |
Sách, tạp chí |
Tiêu đề: |
Doanh nghiệp nào thống trị thị trường bia Việt |
|
4. Ngọc, L. B. & Thiêng, N. T., 2018. Tiêu dùng rượu bia ở Việt Nam, Hanoi: Vietnam University of National Economics |
Sách, tạp chí |
Tiêu đề: |
Tiêu dùng rượu bia ở Việt Nam |
|
5. Sapporo, 2019. https://www.sapporovietnam.com.vn/. [Online] Available at: https://www.sapporovietnam.com.vn/ |
Sách, tạp chí |
Tiêu đề: |
https://www.sapporovietnam.com.vn/ |
|
6. Thong, N. T. H. S. S. Y. Y. B. Q. T., 2017. The role of packaging format, alcohol level and brand in consumer’s choice of beer: A best-worst scaling multi-profile approach. Food Quality and Preference.A. English sources |
Sách, tạp chí |
Tiêu đề: |
Thong, N. T. H. S. S. Y. Y. B. Q. T., 2017. The role of packaging format, alcohol level and brand in consumer’s choice of beer: A best-worst scaling multi-profile approach. "Food Quality and Preference |
|
12. Bahtışen Kavak, Ş. K. E. T. Ş. N. T., 2015. A Literature Review on “Brand” in between 2010-2015. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 6(6), pp. 303-306 |
Sách, tạp chí |
|
14. Cardello, P. P. R. C. & Guo, 2016. Cognitive and emotional differentiators for beer: An exploratory study focusing on “uniqueness”. Food Quality and Preference, pp. 23-28 |
Sách, tạp chí |
|
35. Lischer, B., 2018. Ignyte. [Online] Available at: http://www.ignytebrands.com/what-is-a-brand/[Accessed 30 May 2019] |
Link |
|
48. Singh, S., 2017. IBM SPSS AMOS Foundation Course: AMOS Scratch to Advanced. [Online]Available at: https://www.udemy.com/sem-using-amos/ |
Link |
|
52. Vietcetera, 2019. [Online] Available at: http://vietcetera.com/en/cheers-through-the-ages-vietnams-beer-evolution/ |
Link |
|
7. Abdurrahman, M. F., 2015. Effects of Brand on Consumer Preferences:A study in Turkmenistan. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, pp. 139-150 |
Khác |
|
8. Amadi, C. & Sunday, M., 2014. Factors influencing brand preference of beer consumption in port-harcourt metropolis, Rivers state, Nigeria |
Khác |
|
9. Aquilani, L. P. S., 2015. Beer choice and consumption determinants when craft beers are tasted: An exploratory study of consumer preferences. Food quality and preference, pp. 214-224 |
Khác |
|
10. Awang, 2012. A handbook on SEM Structural Equation Modeling: SEM using AMOS Graphic 5th edition. Kota Baru, Malaysia: University Technology Mara Kelantan |
Khác |
|
11. Awang, Z., n.d. Introduction to structural equation modeling . In: A handbook on SEM. Sultan Zainal Abidin: s.n., pp. 17-39 |
Khác |
|
13. Bettman, J. M. L. M. & Payne, J., 1998. Constructive consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 187-217 |
Khác |
|
15. Carlos Gomez-Corona, H. B. E.-B. M. G. S. C. D. V., 2016. Craft vs. industrial: Habits, attitudes and motivations towards beer. Appetite, pp. 358-367 |
Khác |
|
16. Carole Sester, C. D. O. D. D. V., 2012. Investigating consumers’ representations of beers through a free association task: A comparison between packaging and blind conditions. Food quality and preference, pp. 475-483 |
Khác |
|
17. Charles Lamb, J. H. & McDaniel, C., 2014. MKTG07. South- Western: Cengage Learning |
Khác |
|
18. Cristina Calvo Porral, J. M., 2015. Evidence from the Spanish beer market. Global brands or local heroes?, pp. 565-587 |
Khác |
|