1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Lecture Public economics (5th edition) - Chapter 4: Imperfect competition

15 33 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 15
Dung lượng 3,02 MB

Nội dung

Chapter 4 discuss the social costs of a monopoly and indicate its relevance for deregulation, outline the characteristic features of a natural monopoly, discuss the case for and against regulating a natural monopoly, explain the meaning of the structure-conductperformance (SCP) hypothesis and discuss its relevance for competition policy in South Africa, explain Demsetz’s efficiency hypothesis and discuss its relevance for competition policy generally.

• • • • • Discuss the social costs of a monopoly and indicate its relevance for ‘deregulation’ Outline the characteristic features of a natural monopoly Discuss the case for and against regulating a natural monopoly Explain the meaning of the ‘structure-conductperformance’ (SCP) hypothesis and discuss its relevance for competition policy in South Africa Explain Demsetz’s ‘efficiency hypothesis’ and discuss its relevance for competition policy generally X-inefficiency • Additional cost of a monopoly • Utilisation of existing resources • Labour productivity • Time and effort for research Technological advancement • Incentive • Means Deregulation • Removal of barriers to entry • Natural monopoly – Large capital outlay – Examples: provision of water, electricity, rail & road transport, postal services • • • • • • Increasing returns to scale Privatisation Regulatory measures Regulation Efficiency gains Regulated privatisation • Monopolistic competition – Firms produce close substitutes and each firm has some control over price • Oligopoly – Only a few firms produce a homogeneous product and each one has considerable control over price • Tendency for: – Higher equilibrium quantities at lower equilibrium prices – Lower quantities at higher prices The structure of an industry determines the conduct of its constituent firms, which in turn, determines their performance • • • Highly concentrated industry Correlation between the degree of concentration and profitability of industries Power of highly concentrated industries • • • Indirect government intervention Restrictive practices Abuse of a dominant position • • National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) Competition Act – – – – Competition Commission Rationale for the policy Objective of the policy Focus of the policy • Efficiency hypothesis – Harold Demsetz • Contestable industries and markets – Potential vs actual competition – Global competition ... ‘structure-conductperformance’ (SCP) hypothesis and discuss its relevance for competition policy in South Africa Explain Demsetz’s ‘efficiency hypothesis’ and discuss its relevance for competition. .. a dominant position • • National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) Competition Act – – – – Competition Commission Rationale for the policy Objective of the policy Focus of the... hypothesis – Harold Demsetz • Contestable industries and markets – Potential vs actual competition – Global competition

Ngày đăng: 05/02/2020, 01:19