Chapter 8 - Compensating wage differentials. In this chapter, students will be able to understand: Relative pay rates across jobs, different wages for identical skills, safety regulation, adequate compensation for unpleasant or risky jobs.
Chapter Eight Compensating Wage Differentials Created by: Erica Morrill, M.Ed Fanshawe College © 2002 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8-1 Chapter Focus Relative pay rates across jobs Different wages for identical skills Safety regulation Adequate compensation for unpleasant or risky jobs © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 82 Theory of Compensating Wages Agreeableness/disagreeableness of job Ease/difficulty and expense of learning job Turnover in that position Degree of power and trust held Probability or improbability of success in job © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 83 Isoprofit Schedule Combinations of wages and safety that the firm can provide and maintain the same level of profit Exhibits a diminishing marginal rate of transformation between wages and safety Lower curves imply higher levels of profits © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 84 Figure 8.1 a Isoproft Schedule Wage A Firm is providing little safety and can provide additional safety in a relatively inexpensive manner B Ih Firm is providing considerable safety and can provide additional safety only through the introduction of more sophisticated and costly procedures Io © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 85 Safety Different Firms with Different Safety Technologies Different abilities to provide safety at a given cost Different shaped isoprofit schedules for the same level of profit © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 86 Different Firms with Different Safety Technologies Figure 8.1 b Wages I1 Firm Outer edge = Employer’s offer or market envelope W2 W1 I2 S* Firm Safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 87 Employers’ Offer Curve Maximum wages that will be offered for various levels of safety Points within will not be offered because the other firm can offer a higher wage at the same level of safety Employees will move to the firm supplying the highest wage for each level of safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 88 Individual’s Preferences Illustrated by an isoutility curve combinations of safety and wage that yield the same level of utility Different risk preferences May be willing to give up safety for a compensating risk premium © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 89 Figure 8.2 W Worker Indifference Curves Single individual A B UO S Uh W Two individuals Less risk adverse Ub More risk adverse Ua S © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 810 Figure 8.3 a Market Equilibrium Single Firm and Individual Wages Wc EC IC Sc UC Safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 812 Equilibrium with Many Firms Assuming perfect competition and information individuals will sort themselves into firms of different risks receive compensating wages Wage-safety locus various equilibrium combinations of wages and safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 813 Figure 8.3 b Many Firms and Individuals Wages Uc Ua Market Wage Safety Locus Um Safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 814 Compensating Wage Employers will adopt the most costeffective safety standards not necessarily the safest saving on compensating wages by increasing their safety Termed “shadow” or “implicit” prices because they are embedded in the market wage © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 815 Characteristics of WageSafety Locus Slope is negative compensating wages are required for reductions in safety The slope can change for different levels of safety Determined by the workers’ preferences and the firms technology for safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 816 Alternative Portrayal Wage-risk model Risk is portrayed on the horizontal axis The same conclusions can be derived © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 817 Figure 8.4 Wage-Risk Space Market wage-risk Portrayal U locus m Wages Ua U1 I1 I2 I3 Risk © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 818 Effect of Safety Regulation Perfect Competitive Markets regulation requiring an increased level of safety would cause one or both parties to be worse off © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 819 Figure 8.5 a Response to Safety Standard Reduced Worker Utility Ic Wc Ec Uc Er Wr Sc Ur Sr © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 820 Figure 8.5 b Response to Safety Standard Ir Reduced Employer Profits Ic Wc Ec Uc Wr Sc Sr © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 821 Figure 8.5 c Wage Response to Safety Standards I1 Different Responses of different firms I2 U I3 Sr Safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 822 Imperfect Information If a worker misperceives utility than imposed safety standards could improve workers utility without making employers worse off Providing parties with correct information would also lead to optimal amounts of safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 823 Figure 8.6 Effect of Imperfect Information Wage Wa Wo Eo U Uo p Ua Sa So S Sr Safety p © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 824 Rationale for Regulation Information is not perfect Competition may not prevail Worker does not bear all the cost of an accident Social opinion Worker may prefer a safer environment © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 825 End of Chapter Eight © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 826 ... Figure 8. 4 Wage-Risk Space Market wage-risk Portrayal U locus m Wages Ua U1 I1 I2 I3 Risk © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8 18 Effect of Safety Regulation Perfect Competitive Markets regulation... © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8 16 Alternative Portrayal Wage-risk model Risk is portrayed on the horizontal axis The same conclusions can be derived © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8 17 Figure 8. 4... © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8 11 Figure 8. 3 a Market Equilibrium Single Firm and Individual Wages Wc EC IC Sc UC Safety © 2002 McGrawHill Ryerson Ltd Chapter 8 12 Equilibrium with Many