Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 66 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
66
Dung lượng
2,09 MB
Nội dung
CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotesCapitalMarketExpectations Introduction Organizing the Task: Framework and Challenges 2.1 A Framework for Developing CapitalMarketExpectations 2.2 Challenges in Forecasting Tools for Formulating CapitalMarketExpectations 3.1 Formal Tools 3.2 Survey and Panel Methods 15 3.3 Judgment 16 Economic Analysis 16 4.1 Business Cycle Analysis 16 4.2 Economic Growth Trends 22 4.3 Exogenous Shocks 23 4.4 International Interactions 23 4.5 Economic Forecasting 25 4.6 Using Economic Information in Forecasting Asset Class Returns 26 4.7 Information Sources for Economic Data and Forecasts 28 Summary 29 Examples from the Curriculum 39 Example CapitalMarketExpectations Setting: Information Requirements (1) 39 Example CapitalMarketExpectations Setting: Information Requirements (2) 40 Example Historical Analysis 41 Example Incorporating Economic Analysis into Expected Return Estimates 41 Example Inconsistency of Correlation Estimates: An Illustration 42 Example A Change in Focus from GNP to GDP 42 Example Smoothed Data: The Case of Alternative Investments (1) 42 Example Smoothed Data: The Case of Alternative Investments (2) 44 Example Using Regression Analysis to Identify a Change in Regime 44 Example 10 Causality Relationships 45 Example 11 Traps in Forecasting 45 Example 12 Adjusting a Historical Covariance 45 Example 13 The Grinold–Kroner Forecast of the US Equity Risk Premium 46 IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Example 14 Forecasting the Return on Equities Using the Grinold–Kroner Model 47 Example 15 The Long-Term Real Risk-Free Rate 47 Example 16 The Real Interest Rate and Inflation Premium in Equilibrium 48 Example 17 The Risk Premium: Some Facts 48 Example 18 Justifying CapitalMarket Forecasts 48 Example 19 Setting CME Using the Singer–Terhaar Approach 50 Example 20 Short-Term Consumer Spending in the United Kingdom 53 Example 21 Judgment Applied to Correlation Estimation 53 Example 22 The Yield Curve, Recessions, and Bond Maturity 54 Example 23 Inflation, Disinflation, and Deflation 54 Example 24 An Inflation Forecast for Germany 55 Example 25 The 1980–1982, 2001, and 2008–09 US Recessions 56 Example 26 A Taylor Rule Calculation 57 Example 27 Monetary Policy in the Eurozone Compared with the United States in 2001 and 2010 57 Example 28 Cycles and Trends: An Example 58 Example 29 Forecasting GDP Trend Growth 58 Example 30 An Analyst’s Forecasts 59 Example 31 Central Bank Watching and Short-Term Interest Rate Expectations 60 Example 32 Economic Return Drivers: Energy and Transportation 60 Example 33 Researching US Equity Prospects for a Client 61 Example 34 Modifying Historical CapitalMarketExpectations 63 Example 35 A Currency Example 65 Example 36 The USD/Euro Exchange Rate, 1999–2004 65 This document should be read in conjunction with the corresponding reading in the 2018Level III CFA® Program curriculum Some of the graphs, charts, tables, examples, and figures are copyright 2017, CFA Institute Reproduced and republished with permission from CFA Institute All rights reserved Required disclaimer: CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant the accuracy or quality of the products or services offered by IFTCFA Institute, CFA®, and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Introduction In this reading we will discuss capitalmarketexpectations i.e the investor’s expectations about the risk and return prospects of asset classes Capitalmarketexpectations are a key input in creating a strategic asset allocation An important point to note here is that capitalmarketexpectations are macro expectations By contrast, expectations about individual assets are micro expectations Macro expectations help us in strategic asset allocation, whereas, micro expectations help us in security selection and valuation This reading focuses on macro expectations, we will discuss micro expectations in a later reading The major sections in this reading are: Framework and challenges Tools for formulating capitalmarketexpectations Economic analysis Organizing the Task: Framework and Challenges 2.1 A Framework for Developing CapitalMarketExpectations This section addresses LO.a: LO.a: Discuss the role of, and a framework for, capitalmarketexpectations in the portfolio management process As discussed, capitalmarketexpectations are used to determine an investor’s strategic asset allocation They are an important part of the portfolio management process To formulate capitalmarket expectations, the following framework should be used: Step 1: Specify the final set of expectations that are needed, including the time horizon to which they apply An analyst needs to understand the scope of the analysis, set boundaries and only focus only on what is relevant An investment policy statement can guide you in this task The analyst should write down the questions which need to be answered Examples and in the curriculum contrast the expectation settings for two managers Manger 1’s information requirement relates to US equity and fixed income markets only By contrast, Manger 2’s information requirement relates not only to US and non-US equity and fixed-income markets, but also to three alternative investment types Refer to Example from the curriculum Refer to Example from the curriculum Step 2: Research the historical record Analyzing historical return data can be a useful starting point when forecasting returns However, beyond simply providing average returns over a certain time horizon, historical data should be analyzed to determine the factors which drive returns As noted in Example 3, forecasters who make predictions without regard to past experience have no benchmarks to distinguish between what is new about their expectations and what may be a continuation of past experience If your forecast contradicts the historical trend, you need to supply supporting analysis for IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes your forecast Refer to Example from the curriculum Step 3: Specify the method(s) and/or model(s) that will be used and their information requirements Section discusses several methods that can be used to set capitalmarket expectations, some of which may be more appropriate than others in different circumstances You should consider the time horizon when selecting appropriate model For example, if the time horizon is long, a discounted cash flow model can be used Step 4: Determine the best sources for information needs Using relevant and accurate data is critical to the process of setting capitalmarketexpectations You need to consider the quality of data, the cost involved and the frequency of data (for example, daily data, monthly data etc.) Exhibit 33 provides a list of useful data sources Step 5: Interpret the current investment environment using the selected data and methods, applying experience and judgment For example, if you believe that the economy is headed towards a recession, then you need to factor this in your expectations You cannot say that the historically high returns on equities will continue in the current investment environment Step 6: Provide the set of expectations that are needed, documenting conclusions Having analyzed and interpreted the data, in this step you actually document your expectations You basically answer the questions that were formulated in Step A good forecast should be: Unbiased, objective and well researched Efficient i.e you need to minimize forecast errors Internally consistent, you should not make contradicting predictions For e.g you cannot predict that economy will go in a recession and equities will continue giving high returns Step 7: Monitor actual outcomes and compare them to expectations, providing feedback to improve the expectations-setting process This purpose of this step is to continually refine and improve the forecasting process Refer to Example from the curriculum Refer to Example from the curriculum 2.2 Challenges in Forecasting This section addresses LO.b: LO.b: Discuss challenges in developing capitalmarket forecasts Nine challenges encountered in developing capitalmarket forecasts are: 2.2.1 Limitations of Economic Data Three basic issues to consider for any economic data are: Timeliness: Making accurate forecasts requires access to timely data For example, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics releases monthly non-farm payroll data on the first Friday of the following month By contrast, data measures for smaller, less developed economies may take IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectations IFTNotes months to collect, process, and disseminate Older, stale data is less useful when developing capitalmarketexpectations Accuracy: In addition to being timely, data must also be accurate Data that requires significant revisions after its initial publication is less reliable and therefore less useful for the purpose of forecasting capitalmarketexpectations Definitions and calculation methods: Statistics agencies often make changes to their methods of collecting and processing economic data Analysts must be aware of the effect of the changes and whether data produced using the new methods is consistent with data produced using the old methods For example, many years ago GNP was popularly used but in the last few decades GDP has become the standard for measuring an economy Refer to Example from the curriculum 2.2.2 Data Measurement Errors and Biases The three major issues are: Transcription errors: Transcription errors, which are “errors in gathering and recording data”, can be as simple as data entry errors For example, the number “52” may have been entered when the correct number is 25 Ideally, data providers will have processes to reduce or eliminate transcription errors Survivorship bias: For example, if you are looking at the returns of a hedge fund index, then you need to be aware of the fact that only hedge funds that performed well and survived have reported their performance Hedge funds that did not perform well and did not survive, have not reported their performance So survivorship bias causes: o An upward bias for reported returns o Overly-optimistic expectations of future returns Appraisal (smoothed) data: The prices of assets such as real estate, which not trade in liquid market, are based on periodic appraisals If appraisals are done, for example, each month, the daily prices may be interpolated As shown in Example 7, the periodic snapshots from appraisals smooth out the true volatility of returns The consequences of smoothed data are: o A reported standard deviation of returns that is below the true standard deviation o A downward bias for reported correlations with other assets Refer to Example from the curriculum Refer to Example from the curriculum 2.2.3 The Limitations of Historical Estimates Regime change: A key question when using historical data is determining the appropriate time period to analyze If we are certain that the same return drivers observed in historical data will continue to drive future returns, we can include data going back as long as these return drivers are relevant (i.e., the data is “stationary”) However, events such as regime changes often cause return drivers to change, which results in nonstationary data Effectively, the data predating a change is representative of one regime and the data from the subsequent period represents a different regime Extending the length of the historical period being analyzed increases the risk of including data from multiple regimes Only historical data from a regime that is fully representative of current and expected market conditions should be used IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes To overcome the problem, and to identify if a regime change has occurred, we use regression analysis with dummy variables Refer to Example from the curriculum 2.2.4 Ex Post Risk Can Be a Biased Measure of Ex Ante Risk Ex ante risk is the risk that you are anticipating In contrast, ex post risk is the risk that is based on the data that you have seen in the past Often, analysts are influenced by the historical value of risk while making future estimates of risk 2.2.5 Biases in Analysts’ Methods Commonly observed biases are: Data mining bias: If an analyst takes the same set of data and keeps running computer simulations till he finds some patterns This pattern may not have an economic justification This is an example of data-mining bias To overcome this problem, the best forecasting models limit the variables used to those that have an “explicit economic rationale” Time period bias: Analysts can demonstrate time-period bias by basing their forecasts on time periods were things were a little different For e.g small cap stocks usually outperform large cap stocks But if you looked at data only from the 1975-1983 time period, you would conclude that large cap stocks outperform small cap stocks 2.2.6 The Failure to Account for Conditioning Information Capitalmarketexpectations depend heavily on the assumptions analysts make regarding market conditions For example, Exhibit (below) from Asset Allocation, Section 4.2.3 shows that correlations between developed market and emerging market indexes tend to spike during periods of economic crisis A forecast of return correlations that is based on the assumption of normal market conditions is of no relevance during periods of economic crisis IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes 2.2.7 Misinterpretation of Correlations Correlation is not (necessarily) causation As noted in the curriculum, there are at least three possible explanations for a high correlation between variable A and variable B: A predicts B B predicts A A third variable C predicts both A and B After observing a high correlation between two variables, you need to correctly predict where that high correlation is coming from Refer to Example 10 from the curriculum 2.2.8 Psychological Traps Biases that should be considered with respect to forecasting capitalmarketexpectations are discussed below: Anchoring trap: This refers to the tendency of investors to focus on a specific purchase price or price target In the context of capitalmarket expectations, an analyst may become anchored on the first information he receives and fail to adequately incorporate new information that suggests the first information is no longer accurate Status quo trap: The status quo trap is the tendency to set capitalmarketexpectations based on the assumption that current economic trends will continue In Example 11, Philip Lasky expects the recent market downturn to continue despite the fact that his portfolio has generated positive risk-adjusted returns over the past three years Refer to Example 11 from the curriculum Confirming evidence trap: The confirming evidence trap, is the tendency to give greater weight to information that supports one’s preexisting beliefs In Example 11, Philip Lasky has read numerous estimates of the Canadian equity risk premium, but repeatedly refers to the most pessimistic of those in his conversation with Cynthia Casey Overconfidence trap: When setting capitalmarket expectations, analysts often rely on models, which can lead them to provide overly-precise forecasts and refuse to consider the possibility that outcomes may fall outside a narrow range Prudence trap: Analysts may moderate their capitalmarketexpectations in order to avoid appearing extreme and out-of-line with the market consensus In Example 11, Cynthia Casey revises her initial estimate of economic growth downward after perceiving that many of her clients consider this view to be overly-optimistic Recallability trap: When setting capitalmarket expectations, analysts can be unduly influenced by memories of past events, which result in skewed forecasts For example, a manager with strong memories of failing to profit from a bull market may produce overly-optimistic forecasts 2.2.9 Model Uncertainty The uncertainty surrounding which model can be used to generate accurate forecasts is called model uncertainty By contrast, an analyst may be certain about which model to use, but uncertain about the quality of the input data This second form of uncertainty is called input uncertainty IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Tools for Formulating CapitalMarketExpectations In order to produce these estimates, an analyst can use: Formal research tools (see Section 3.1) Survey and panel methods (see Section 3.2) Judgment based on their past experiences (see Section 3.3) 3.1 Formal Tools This section addresses LO.c: LO.c: Demonstrate the application of formal tools for setting capitalmarket expectations, including statistical tools, discounted cash flow models, the risk premium approach, and financial equilibrium models Compared to the methods discussed in sections 3.2 and 3.3, formal research tools are empirically-based methods designed to produce precise forecasts of variables such as the expected return for a given asset class over a specific period Formal quantitative tools are used extensively throughout the investment sector, because they allow analysts to document the use of an objective forecasting process The tools discussed in this section are: Statistical methods (3.1.1) Discounted cash flow (DCF) models (3.1.2) Risk premium approach (3.1.3) Financial market equilibrium (3.1.4) Note that Example (in Section 2.1) provides a brief discussion of each of these tools 3.1.1 Statistical Methods When studying the statistical methods that can be used to develop capitalmarket expectations, it is helpful to remember the end product of this process Exhibit 10 from Example 18 (Section 3.1.4) is shown below as a reminder IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Historical Statistical Approach: Sample Estimators: The “simplest approach” to generate the returns, standard deviations, and correlations that appear in Exhibit 10 would be to use their historical averages For example, as shown in Exhibit 3, the arithmetic mean annual return for US equities was 8.3 percent with a standard deviation of 20.3 percent between 1900 and 2010 If the analyst believes that the factors that drive US equity returns were constant during this period and are representative of current and expected market conditions, she may use on these historical averages Shrinkage Estimators: Rather than relying exclusively on historical data, an analyst may use the shrinkage estimation method, which produces a forecast that is a weighted average of historical data and data generated using another forecasting method In Example 12, Cynthia Casey gives a 0.3 weighting the covariance figure derived from historical data and a 0.7 weighting to the covariance figure generated using a factor model approach Refer to Example 12 from the curriculum Time-Series Estimators: Time-series models estimate a variable’s future value based on its past (lagged) values (and possibly lagged values of other variables) The relevant lagged values are plugged into a regression formula, which produces a forecast of the dependent variable For example, volatility in the current period can be stated as the weighted average of the previous period volatility and a random error term Multifactor Models: Multi-factor models use regression analysis of historical data to identify return drivers, which are used as independent variables in a regression formula that produces a forecast of the dependent variable They are useful for the following reasons: Returns on all assets are related to a common set of return divers Filters out noise (when factors are well chosen) IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page CapitalMarketExpectations IFTNotes Makes it easy to verify the consistency of the covariance matrix Exhibit assumes that the two factors Global Equity Factor and Global Bonds Factor drive the returns of all assets Given a standard deviation of 14% for equities and 4% for bonds and a correlation of 0.3 among the two factors, we can create the following factor covariance matrix Global Equity Global Bonds Factor Covariance Matrix Global Equity 0.0196 (0.14 x 0.14 ) 0.0017 (0.14 x 0.04 x 0.3) Global Bonds 0.0017 (0.14 x 0.04 x 0.3) 0.0016 (0.04 x 0.04) To derive the asset covariance market we need to know how a market responds to factor movements Refer to Exhibit which shows the hypothetical statistics for five markets The numbers are derived through statistical methods such as regression of historical data Market A Market B Market C Market D Market E Sensitivities Global Equity (F1) Global Bonds (F2) 1.10 1.05 0.9 0 1.03 0.99 Residual Risk (%) 10.0 8.0 7.0 1.2 0.9 In the above example, if Market A moves by 110 points in response to 100 point move of global equities, then the factor sensitivity of Market A to Factor (Global Equity) is 1.1 We can say that Market A is a pure equity market since the factor sensitivity to global bonds is The covariance between Markets A and B can be calculated using the following formula: Mij=bi1bj1Var(F1)+bi2bj2Var(F2)+(bi1bj2+bi2bj1)Cov(F1,F2) (For i=1 to 5, j = to 5, and i≠j) M12 = (1.1)(1.05)(0.0196) + (0)(0)(0.0016) + [(1.10)(0) + (0)(1.05)](0.0017) = 0.0226 3.1.2 Discounted Cash Flow Models Discounted cash flow (DCF) models provide an expected return (or fair price) based on cash flows and expected growth Because they are forward-looking, DCF models are especially useful in the process of setting long-term capitalmarketexpectations in stable, developed markets They are much less appropriate for short-term forecasts DCF models can be applied to equity markets as well as fixedincome markets Equity Markets Gordon Growth Model: The best-known DCF model is the Gordon (constant) growth model, which appears below: IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 10 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes RPnon-US FI = 9.1% × 0.28 = 2.55% RPUS RE = (11.5% × 0.28) + 0.30% = 3.22% + 0.30% = 3.52% Note that we added an illiquidity premium of 0.3 percent to the ICAPM derived premium estimates for real estate Step We now weight each asset class’s fully integrated and segmented premiums according to the assumed degree of integration RPUS equities = (0.8 × 3.74%) + (0.2 × 4.4%) = 3.87% RPUS FI = (0.8 × 0.80%) + (0.2 × 1.06%) = 0.85% RPnon-US equities = (0.8 × 3.49%) + (0.2 × 4.37%) = 3.67% RPnon-US FI = (0.8 × 1.78%) + (0.2 × 2.55%) = 1.93% RPUS RE = (0.7 × 1.91%) + (0.3 × 3.52%) = 2.39% Step The expected return estimates are as follows: E(RUS equities) = 3% + 3.87% = 6.87% E(RUS FI) = 3% + 0.85% = 3.85% E(Rnon-US equities) = 3% + 3.67% = 6.67% E(Rnon-US FI) = 3% + 1.93% = 4.93% E(RUS RE) = 3% + 2.39% = 5.39% Solution to 2: Based on Equation 3b with one factor, the covariance between any two assets in a one-beta model (such as the ICAPM) is equal to the product of each asset’s beta with respect to the market times the variance of the market The needed betas can be calculated as βUS equities = (15.7% × 0.85)/7% = 1.91 βUS FI = (3.8% × 0.75)/7% = 0.41 and the covariance between US equities and US fixed income returns as Cov(US equities, US FI) = 1.91 × 0.41 × (7%)2 = 38.37 (in units of percent squared) Solution to 3: Although the client is correct about the foundation’s home-country bias, the point being made is not correct The equilibrium risk premium is determined by all investors, reflected in the overall degree of IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 52 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes integration estimates Back to Notes Example 20 Short-Term Consumer Spending in the United Kingdom Bryan Smith is researching the 6- to 12-month expectations for consumer spending in the United Kingdom as of the middle of 2003 One piece of evidence he gathers is changes in consumer sentiment in the United Kingdom as measured by the Economic Optimism Index, shown in Exhibit 13 Interpret Exhibit 13 as it relates to the probable path of consumer spending Solution: Based on the reading at December 2003 of the UK Consumer Optimism Index, it appears that consumers are considerably more optimistic than in December 2002 Rising consumer optimism is a reflection of consumers feeling secure about their income stream and future Rising consumer optimism suggests that near-term consumer spending will increase Back to Notes Example 21 Judgment Applied to Correlation Estimation William Chew’s firm uses a multifactor model to develop initial correlation forecasts that are then challenged by professionals within the capital markets unit Based on US historical data including periods of high inflation, Chew finds that the model forecasts a correlation between US equity and US bonds in the range of 0.40 to 0.45 Based on empirical evidence, Chew believes that the correlation between equity and bond returns is higher in high-inflation periods than in low-inflation periods His firm’s chief economist forecasts that in the medium term, US inflation will be low, averaging less than percent per annum In light of that forecast, Chew has decided that he will recommend a judgmental downward adjustment of the correlation to 0.30 IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 53 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Back to Notes Example 22 The Yield Curve, Recessions, and Bond Maturity The yield spread between the 10-year T-bond rate and the 3-month T-bill rate has been found internationally to be a predictor of future growth in output The observed tendency is for the yield spread to narrow or become negative prior to recessions Another way of saying the same thing is that the yield curve tends to flatten or become inverted prior to a recession Effects that may explain a declining yield spread include the following: 1) Future short-term rates are expected to fall, and/or 2) investors’ required premium for holding long-term bonds rather than short-term bonds has fallen At least, the link between an expected decline in short-term rates from expected lower loan demand and declining output growth is economically somewhat intuitive When the yield spread is expected to narrow (the yield curve is moving toward inversion), long-duration bonds should outperform short-duration bonds On the other hand, a widening yield spread (for example, an inverted yield curve moving to an upward-sloping yield curve) favors short-duration bonds Back to Notes Example 23 Inflation, Disinflation, and Deflation Today, people expect prices of goods and services and of investment assets to trend up over time However, during most of the 19th century and through the 20th century prior to the 1960s, price inflation was negligible Indeed, the price level in the United Kingdom fell for a large part of the 19th century In the United States, the main period of inflation occurred during the Civil War (1861–65) Prices dropped for long periods otherwise However, from the late 1950s until the late 1970s, inflation gradually accelerated almost everywhere, reaching over 10 percent in the United States and over 30 percent in the United Kingdom for brief periods Then from about 1979, a period of disinflation set in as inflation gradually retreated back toward zero Exhibit 16 illustrates the inflation rates in the United States and the United Kingdom since the 1950s IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 54 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Back to Notes Example 24 An Inflation Forecast for Germany Early in 2011, Hans Vermaelen, a capitalmarket analyst, has the task of making an inflation forecast for Germany over the next to 12 months Vermaelen gathers the following inputs and outputs: Inputs A survey of manufacturers, asking them whether they expect to see price declines for the products they sell in order to stay globally competitive in light of a then-strengthening euro Information on German manufacturing orders and consumer price inflation Data inputs for a multifactor model including the following variables: prices of commodities; prices for labor; wholesale and producer price measures Outputs The survey of manufacturers indicates that manufacturers are facing challenges passing some price increases to German customers After initially lowering export product prices to maintain market share in the face of a rising euro, German manufacturers are now passing price increases on to their international customers, thereby restoring their profit margins Current year-over-year annual inflation of 2.6 percent is above the average annual rate of 1.6 percent experienced over the past 10 years and over the past 10 quarters Manufacturing orders have increased at about a percent average rate over the past year However, over the past IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 55 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes quarter, manufacturing orders have decrease at a percent year-over-year rate Exhibit 17 graphs inflation and manufacturing orders The multifactor model indicates a positive correlation between the inflation rate and manufacturing orders and a negative correlation between a strengthening local currency (euro) and inflation Based on the above information, Vermaelen forecasts that inflation will decrease to a 1.6 percent rate over the next 6–12 months Critique Vermaelen’s forecast Solution: The manufacturing orders have been decreasing recently at a percent year-over-year rate versus a percent average rate over the past year This fact suggests that the German economy may be weakening At the same time, the survey of manufacturers indicates that they are having difficulty passing along price increases to customers These factors suggest a decrease in inflation from the recent 2.6 percent rate Overall, it is reasonable to forecast a return to the recent average trend inflation rate of 1.6 percent Back to Notes Example 25 The 1980–1982, 2001, and 2008–09 US Recessions The US downturn in 1980–1982 was particularly severe Inflation had reached 12–14 percent in early 1980, partly due to a rise in oil prices The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under its new chairman, Paul Volcker, was determined to eradicate inflation The Fed kept interest rates high in 1982 In contrast, the 2001 recession was relatively mild There had been a stock market bubble, but commercial property prices were not inflated and banks were in good shape Because inflation was low, IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 56 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes the Fed was willing to cut interest rates very rapidly The 2001 recession is instructive on the limitations of economic data, which are backward looking and often revised After the terrorist attack of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Center, much commentary focused on the risk that it would lead to a recession In fact, the revised GDP data show that the economy had been in a recession since early in 2001 and began to come out of it starting in October 2001 At the time, it was clear that the economy was weak and therefore growing at less than the trend rate, so bond yields fell and the stock market declined In the late 2000s, the collapse of a bubble (speculative run-up) in housing prices, along with a crisis in subprime mortgages, led to a global financial crisis and recessions in most developed countries The US recession saw a peak-to-trough decline in GDP of 5.1 percent, marking the most severe of post World War II US recessions A low inflationary environment permitted the Fed to pursue expansionary monetary policy, though with limited impact on economic growth and unemployment Back to Notes Example 26 A Taylor Rule Calculation Assume the following scenario: The neutral value of the short-term interest rate is 3.5 percent The inflation target is 2.5 percent The GDP trend rate of growth is percent If the inflation forecast is percent and the forecast for GDP growth is percent, what is the optimal short-term interest rate? Solution: According to the Taylor rule, Roptimal=Rneutral+[0.5×(GDPgforecast−GDPgtrend)+0.5×(Iforecast−Itarget)] =3.5%+[0.5(1.0%−3.0%)+0.5(4.0%−2.5%)] =3.5%+(−1.0%+0.75%) =3.5%−0.25% =3.25% The GDP growth forecast by itself implies that the short-term interest rate should be lowered by percentage point, because GDP growth is under trend Partially offsetting the effect of below-trend GDP growth is the interest rate increase implied by above-target inflation Net, the Taylor rule implies that the central bank should lower short-term rates by 25 bps to 3.25 percent Back to Notes Example 27 Monetary Policy in the Eurozone Compared with the United States in 2001 and 2010 Both Europe and the United States saw a sharp economic slowdown in 2001 The Fed responded by IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 57 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes cutting the fed funds rate from 6.50 percent to 1.75 percent during 2001 In contrast, the European Central Bank (ECB), the central bank for the Eurozone, cut interest rates from 4.75 percent to 3.50 percent, a much less aggressive move The reasons for these different responses were twofold: In 2001, US CPI inflation stood at 2.6 percent, well within the Fed’s likely informal target range of 1–3 percent inflation Coincidentally, the Eurozone also had inflation of 2.6 percent in mid2001, but this rate was above the explicit target range of 0–2 percent In the United States, unemployment rose rapidly during 2001 from about percent to nearly percent, opening an output gap in the economy In contrast, Eurozone unemployment was constant at percent for most of 2001, rising only slightly at the end of the year Hence, the ECB welcomed the slowdown as a way to put downward pressure on inflation In response to the financial crisis and ensuing recession in the period of 2007–2009, both the ECB and the Fed acted in a coordinated manner by first flooding their respective markets with liquidity and then cutting interest rates to or close to zero To further address stubborn stagnation in economic growth and high unemployment, the Fed and ECB resorted to such nontraditional measures as implementing bond buying programs which came to be known as Quantitative Easing I and II (QE I and QE II) Back to Notes Example 28 Cycles and Trends: An Example Consider the following hypothetical passage describing the German economy in late 2010: After a recession in 2009 and stagnation in the first quarter of 2010, the German economy picked up Starting in the second quarter of 2010, it grew at 2.1 percent annualized Exports led the way, and business investment picked up Consumer spending grew strongly in early 2010 Significant progress on labor market reforms and pension reforms by the government, as well as increased sales to India and China, boosted confidence R & D spending increases led to significant export growth which was further assisted by a weak Euro In response, the Bundes Bank increased the economic growth forecast from 1.9% to 3.0%, which was above the projected trend growth rate of 2.5% These two statements contain information about the economy The first refers to the business cycle, while the second describes other economic trends The final sentence is a mixture of cycle and trend information It provides the government forecast for economic growth in the following year (cyclical information) but also implies an estimate for the long-term average rate of growth that the German economy is believed capable of achieving (2.5 percent per year) Back to Notes Example 29 Forecasting GDP Trend Growth Cynthia Casey is reviewing a consultant’s forecast that Canadian GDP will grow at a long-term 3.5 percent annual rate According to Casey’s own research, a 3.2 percent growth rate is more realistic Casey and the consultant agree on the following assumptions: IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 58 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes The size of the Canadian labor force will grow at percent per year based on population projections Labor force participation will grow at 0.25 percent per year Growth from capital inputs will be 1.5 percent per year Determine the reason for the discrepancy between Casey’s forecast and the consultant’s forecast Solution: Casey and the consultant agree on three of the four components of GDP growth, so the reason for the discrepancy in their GDP growth forecasts must be disagreement about the value of the fourth component, total factor productivity growth For Casey to arrive at a 3.2 percent growth rate estimate, she must be assuming that total factor productivity growth will be 3.2% − (1% + 0.25% + 1.5%) = 0.45% By contrast, the consultant is predicting that total factor productivity growth will be 3.5% − (1% + 0.25% + 1.5%) = 0.75% Thus, the consultant is more optimistic than Casey about GDP growth from increases in the productivity in using capital inputs Back to Notes Example 30 An Analyst’s Forecasts As a capitalmarket analyst at a large money management firm, Charles Johnson has developed a list of six broad questions for evaluating the economy The questions are given below with his responses for his own national market The current inflation rate is percent per year A Is consumer spending increasing or decreasing? Johnson: Consumer spending is increasing at a lackluster rate of 0.75 percent per annum B Are business conditions and fundamentals growing stronger or weakening? Johnson: Based on recent values of manufacturers’ new orders for consumer goods and materials and non-defense capital goods, business demand is weakening C What is the consensus forecast for the GDP growth rate over the next year? Johnson: The median forecast from a survey of economists is that GDP will decline from a 3.5 percent to a 3.0 percent annual growth rate D Are government programs and fiscal policy becoming more restrictive or expansive? Johnson: Political support for a stimulative fiscal policy is absent; fiscal policy will be neutral E Is monetary policy neutral, tightening, or loosening? Johnson: Monetary policy is neutral F Is inflation in a steady state (state of equilibrium)? Johnson: The current inflation rate of percent is close to a steady state value Based on the information given, what conclusions will Johnson reach concerning: inflation over the next six months? short-term interest rates? IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 59 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Solution to 1: Based on the expected slow growth in consumer demand and weakening business demand, inflation should remain muted over the next six months Solution to 2: Reduced aggregate economic activity and stable inflation should allow for stable to falling interest rates Back to Notes Example 31 Central Bank Watching and Short-Term Interest Rate Expectations At the beginning of 2000, the US stock market bubble peaked and the economy was strong At this point, one-month US interest rates stood at about 5.7 percent per annum, with the six-month yield about 40 basis points higher at 6.1 percent per annum Interest rates had already moved up in 1999, but the market was expecting the Federal Reserve to announce additional small increases in rates to help slow the economy and avoid rising inflation A money manager might have been tempted to buy the longer-term paper, given its higher yield However, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates faster than expected, with the fed funds rate moving up from 5.5 percent to 6.5 percent by June 2000 The best place to be was therefore at the short end of the curve, because by May 2000, one-month paper could be bought to yield 6.5 percent per annum and six-month paper could be bought to yield 6.8 percent per annum During periods of rising short-term rates, keeping maturities short is a good strategy Early summer 2000 turned out to be the peak for US interest rates, and rates were cut sharply in 2001 when the US economy went into recession In November 2000, shortly before the markets began to expect that the Fed would cut interest rates sharply, six-month rates of 6.7 percent per annum were available, just above one-month rates of 6.5 percent per annum In the first months of 2001, the Fed cut rates rapidly and one-month yields fell to percent per annum by May 2001 with an average yield of only just over percent per annum Consider a manager who, during the summer of 2000, correctly anticipated the actions of the Fed in 2001 For such a manager, contrast the appropriateness of the following two strategies: An investment strategy of rolling over one-month paper An investment strategy of buying longer-maturity paper (in this case, six-month paper) Solution: The second strategy is superior, as it would lock in the higher yields for six months in a declining interest rate environment By contrast, the first strategy counts on interest rates rising, not declining The first strategy would produce higher returns only if interest rates rose Back to Notes Example 32 Economic Return Drivers: Energy and Transportation Willem DeVries is researching the macroeconomic return drivers of the energy and transportation industries He has gathered the information in Exhibit 27 from a US investment manager’s research IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 60 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes report Energy Industry Transportation Industry GDP Inflation Interest Rates GDP Inflation Interest Rates Sales +0.10 +0.77 +0.78 +0.58 +0.75 +0.74 Earnings +0.13 +0.66 +0.67 +0.81 +0.26 +0.25 Dividends +0.16 +0.03 +0.05 +0.65 −0.03 −0.08 Using only the information given, compare and contrast the macroeconomic return drivers of the energy and transportation industries Solution: The larger positive correlations between GDP and the transportation industry’s sales, earnings, and dividends compared to the corresponding correlations for the energy industry are an indication that transportation companies are more procyclical Sales for the energy and transportation industries are approximately equally positively related to inflation and interest rates However, earnings are less positively correlated with inflation and interest rates for the transportation industry Transportation companies appear to be less able to pass through to customers the increased costs of higher inflation and interest rates These observations should be helpful when one is using economic factors to draw inferences on future industry fundamentals Back to Notes Example 33 Researching US Equity Prospects for a Client In the beginning of 2004, Michael Wu has one of his regular quarterly meetings with an institutional client for whom he manages a US equity portfolio The economic forecasts of Wu’s firm covering the next 12–18 months are consistent with the client’s view that short-term interest rates will be increasing from 3.0 percent to 3.5 percent while long-term government bonds will return 5.5 percent The client views US equities as currently slightly overvalued The client is not optimistic about long-term prospects for US equities either and states to Wu that the long-term US equity risk premium will be in the range of 1.0 percent to 2.5 percent The client asks Wu to help him decide, based on economic analysis, whether a 1.0 percent or 2.5 equity risk premium is more likely Wu summarizes his firm’s research in Exhibit 28 Expected Economic Trends/Impact Forecast Category Short-Term (1 Year) Macroeconomy E(Trend): Slowing GDP growth E(Economic Impact): Negative: Growth slowing from percent to a lower rate IFTNotes for the Level III Exam Long-Term (> Year) Average growth [3.1% annual GDP growth] E(Trend): Stable E(Economic Impact): Neutral Comments on Economic Measures and Categories High current economic growth rate is due to fiscal and monetary stimuli and is not sustainable Overall economic growth rate to slow to a lower 3.1% rate beyond 1-year time horizon www.ift.world Page 61 CapitalMarketExpectations Expected Economic Trends/Impact Forecast IFTNotes Comments on Economic Measures and Categories Category Short-Term (1 Year) Long-Term (> Year) Consumer E(Trend): Improving consumer spending E(Economic Impact): Positive E(Trend): Stable E(Economic Impact): Positive Looking forward, stabilization in employment patterns and personal income will aid the consumer component of the economy Business E(Trend): Stable E(Economic Impact): Neutral E(Trend): Stable E(Economic Impact): Positive The low base against which current results are being compared has aided profit and sales growth rate comparisons Productivity growth has been aided by the weak employment (hiring) practices of the past few years As employment rises, profit and productivity increases will diminish Export-oriented businesses will be in the best position over the next few years as the US dollar is expected to decline further Sales and profits showing signs of strength but are being compared to weak prior year results Central bank Economic strength and fiscal deficits likely to put pressure on shortterm interest rates; slightly higher inflation E(Trend): Declining stimulation E(Economic Impact): Negative E(Trend): Stable E(Economic Impact): Neutral Short-term rates and inflation rate will stabilize near long-term average rates Monetary stimulus expected to be reduced in light of the increased economic strength The stronger economy will place upward pressure on short-term interest rates and on the rate of inflation near-term, but short-term interest rates and inflation are expected to quickly stabilize near their long-term average rates Government E(Trend): Stable measures E(Economic Impact): Positive E(Trend): Weakening E(Economic Impact): Negative Fiscal stimulus (i.e., deficit spending and tax cuts) is giving a current boost to GDP More work must be done to cut the budget deficit and to deal with a declining dollar The US government needs to deal with the problem of increasing long-term transfer payment costs Using only the information in Exhibit 28, address the following problems: State and justify a long-term expected return for equities within the client’s guidelines Comment on whether the economic data support the client’s belief that the equity market is overvalued Solution to 1: The consumer and business sectors are critical for corporate profits, and the long-term forecast strengths of these sectors are a positive for US equities The central bank appears to be a neutral factor long-term Although the government sector is a negative, it is not expected to push inflation and interest rates above their long-term averages Overall, a 2.5 percent equity risk premium, at the upper end of the client’s range, appears to be justified by the positive economic outlook, which would lead to a forecast of an 8.0 percent arithmetic average return on equities (A long government bond expected return of 5.5% + expected equity risk premium of 2.5% = 8.0% expected equity return over the forecast IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 62 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes period.) Solution to 2: By contrast to the long-term forecasts, the short-term economic forecasts of decelerating growth and increasing interest rates might constitute a negative for short-term equity returns However, the analyst would need to evaluate whether current market prices incorporate this information before concurring in the client’s assessment Back to Notes Example 34 Modifying Historical CapitalMarketExpectations Cortney Young is an investment analyst in a firm serving an international clientele Young’s firm has developed the baseline forecasts shown in Exhibit 29 for six asset classes that are particularly relevant for UK-focused portfolios The forecasts are based on a recent part of the historical record of the asset classes Young is currently working on establishing capitalmarketexpectations for mean return and standard deviation of returns for these six asset classes based on a one-year horizon; she focuses first on the UK equities, UK intermediate-term bonds, UK long-term bonds, and UK real estate Asset Class Mean Annual Returns (%) Standard Deviation of Returns (%) UK equities 9.72 15.3 Non-UK equities 8.94 11.6 UK intermediate-term bonds 3.60 6.5 UK long-term bonds 4.42 7.7 International bonds 4.81 8.3 UK real estate 12.63 8.7 Young’s economic analysis leads her to the conclusions on the UK economy shown in Exhibit 30 Economic Category Economic Conclusion Consumers Consumer spending is expected to be stronger over the next year with very positive effects for the UK economy Business Business spending, revenues, and profits are expected to show solid growth in yearover-year results over the next 12 months Government Tax policies are stable Government is currently a source of moderate economic stimulation Central bank It is anticipated that the Bank of England (the central bank) will want to hold shortterm interest rates steady over the next year The inflation target is percent Inflation rates The inflation rate is expected to increase to 2.2 percent per year over the next year Other/Unique The UK economy is expected to outperform other major economies over the next 12 months The growth of the real estate sector will moderate IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 63 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Explain the expected impact on UK asset classes of each of Young’s economic conclusions Demonstrate and justify the direction of judgmental modifications that Young might make to the baseline forecasts of her firm Solution to 1: Young reaches the conclusions shown in Exhibit 31 Economic Conclusion Market/Asset Class Impact Consumers Consumers are creating a positive investment environment for corporate profits and therefore for UK equities and credit quality However, if spending rises much more steeply than anticipated, we might expect upward pressure on both short-term and long-term interest rates that would be a negative for bonds and real estate Business The economic conclusion is a positive for UK equities and bonds via improved credit quality However, predicted business growth may put upward pressure on wages, costs, and inflation rates Government The government sector conclusion is a slight positive for the economy at this time Central bank The expected steady interest rate environment is a positive factor for the UK investment market If the economy expands too quickly, there may be pressure from the central bank for higher interest rates looking out 12 months Inflation rates The current stable inflation picture should have a positive impact on the economy and on the financial assets we are comparing in this analysis Other/Unique Returns to UK real estate should moderate from unusually high rates Solution to 2: The arrows in Exhibit 32 indicate the direction of adjustment to the baseline forecasts Asset Class Average Annual Returns Average Annual Standard Deviation UK equities ↑ ↓ or → Intermediate bonds → ↑ Long-term bonds → ↑ Real estate ↓ ↑ The growth outlook for consumers and businesses is a strong positive for UK equities The steady central bank, government, and inflation outlooks suggest below-average or at least unchanged volatility The outlook of steady interest rates is neutral for intermediate- and long-term bonds, but the uncertainty about the economy overheating suggests an increase in risk Real estate’s returns should decrease from the high baseline forecast The break with the past trend growth should translate into higher risk for real estate Back to NotesIFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 64 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes Example 35 A Currency Example Between 1990 and July 1997, the Bank of Thailand managed the Thai baht in a narrow range Over time, a gradual loss of competitiveness through higher inflation pushed the current account deficit up to percent of GDP, financed by strong capital inflows In 1996, the economy slowed and capital inflows faltered, prompting speculation that the baht might fall The central bank intervened heavily to defend the baht in early 1997 but by midyear had exhausted its reserves and was forced to float the currency Within a few months, the baht halved in value and other currencies in the region were also under pressure The Asian crisis of 1997 had begun Back to Notes Example 36 The USD/Euro Exchange Rate, 1999–2004 The euro was first established as a currency at the beginning of 1999 To the surprise of nearly everyone, it started trading weakly, its value against the US dollar falling from about US$1.17 to a low of US$0.82 in late 2000 But beginning in 2001 and accelerating in 2002–2004, the dollar fell In 2004, the euro reached US$1.37 On a PPP basis, the euro probably lies in the range of US$1.10-US$1.20 So, in the course of five years, the exchange rate cycled around that level These swings can be considered according to the three explanations below Relative economic strength: This approach explains why the dollar rose strongly in 1999–2000, with faster economic growth and consequent higher interest rates in the United States In 2001, the fact that the US economy was weaker than that of the Eurozone helps to explain why the dollar peaked and went sideways during that year The explanation breaks down in 2002–2003, however Despite the superior performance of the US economy over the Eurozone in 2002 and beyond, the dollar retraced its path all the way back to its starting point Capital flows: This approach explains more about the dollar’s recent moves The dollar’s strength in 1999–2000 was matched by massive long-term inflows into the United States in the form of foreign direct investment and equity purchases In 2001, these flows fell off rapidly, though there were still large inflows into US bonds The current account deficit had expanded by then as a result of the strong dollar, so the capital flows were no longer large relative to the necessary inflow to finance the deficit Hence, the dollar’s decline Savings–investment imbalances: During 1999–2000, the US economy grew very rapidly with pressure to reduce domestic savings and increase investment Households reduced savings, encouraged by low and falling unemployment and the rising stock prices Businesses cut savings because they saw major new investment opportunities The result was a soaring US dollar opening up the current account deficit, further encouraged by the inflow of capital described above In 2001–2002, the private sector deficit was slashed drastically as companies cut back on borrowing and spending The government cut taxes and shifted the government accounts from surplus to deficit But the dollar still fell back against the euro because the current account deficit needed to be in the 4–6 percent range to balance the internal savings balances Hence, the dollar fell back from its still-overvalued position and nosed into undervalued territory This approach, if correct, suggests that the dollar’s weakness (at least in 2004–2005) may be limited by IFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 65 CapitalMarketExpectationsIFTNotes the continued large government borrowing requirement and low private savings Beyond 2005, however, the dollar could reach past lows if either the government makes a major effort to reduce the budget deficit or an economic slowdown prompts increased private savings Back to NotesIFTNotes for the Level III Exam www.ift.world Page 66 ... trademarks owned by CFA Institute IFT Notes for the Level III Exam www .ift. world Page Capital Market Expectations IFT Notes Introduction In this reading we will discuss capital market expectations i.e... setting capital market expectations; IFT Notes for the Level III Exam www .ift. world Page 30 Capital Market Expectations Tool Comment Statistical Methods Discounted Cash Flow Models IFT Notes. .. relatively unchanged over time Refer to Example 20 from the curriculum IFT Notes for the Level III Exam www .ift. world Page 15 Capital Market Expectations IFT Notes 3. 3 Judgment An analyst may use formal