Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequent change job To what extent you agree or disagree There is a growing concern that pursuing a job can have a better result than people who make alternations in their occupations In my opinion, I strongly agree that sticking to a certain career can bring people satisfactory life On the one hand, doing one job can lead to a fulfilling working life First, a stable occupation would conducive to bigger promotion if individuals work with high commitment and dedication For example, the average starting salary in Vietnam is million dong per month However, the payment promotes to million Dong after months of trial period Second, get-along staffs are more trustworthy than those you just know them a short period and you could aware what you employer requires after a long time becoming a partner at work Therefore, this can culminate in a more comfortable working environment and increasing work efficiency especially in doing teamwork On the other hand, people frequently change jobs fail to have satisfying career life Freshmen are likely to handle judgments about their experience inadequacies and discriminately made to works that are out of their duty Job hoppers might have the state of being unemployed, which makes their living condition get worse Companies only provide their full-time employees pension and health insurance during work and retire For instance, in many developing countries such as Vietnam, the retirees find it easier to live their old life with the money from the pension The people change jobs constantly are not able to receive these advantages To the job hoppers, they are more likely to have shallow relationships and hard to find the connection with other staffs In conclusion, I believe that a permanent job would offer more positive benefits than changing job frequently (289) The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and even be damaging Do you agree or disagree? It is suggested that the society can gain beneficial from prohibiting all kinds of advertising Moreover, an advertisement is believed to bring no use and cause drawbacks In my opinion, this assumption is a highly subjective point of view, and therefore I completely disagree with it It is undeniable fact that advertising plays a crucial role in human life with useful purposes Advertisement is a mean for companies to communicate with their potential customers Thanks to advertising the information comes faster to customers With advertisement, people are informed the choices they have, by that, they can compare each product to another to find the better For example, on the commercial of facial cleansing bushes, they pointed out the advantages and the drawbacks of Foreo and Clarisonic so that individuals can buy the appropriate to their needs Advertising is a creative industry that needs large workforce; therefore, many people can find their job From another prospective, the society would have undesirable implications if advertising is banned People search the price of products before shopping and generally try to find the cheapest one with the same quality At this point, commercials help us save money by providing information on markets and properties of products Nevertheless, cooperates and companies nowadays need advertisement in order to survive in fierce competition Excellent advertisements boost the sales of commodities and thus increase the business profit For instance, a local shoes brand in Vietnam, Biti’s, which was thought to go bankrupt, suddenly came up with the commercial on a music video In result, their products were rapidly out of stock In conclusion, we cannot deny the advantages that advertising brings to the society and it is not for the sake of everyone’s interests that advertisements have to be prohibited (293)