Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 11 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
11
Dung lượng
347,42 KB
Nội dung
HNUE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 2018, Volume 63, Issue 5A, pp This paper is available online at http://stdb.hnue.edu.vn USING PROJECTWORK TO FOSTER LEARNERAUTONOMY AT A PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY, VIETNAM: A CASE STUDY Cao Thi Hong Phuong1, Le Thi Minh Nguyet 12 Faculty of English, Hanoi National University of Education Abstract The ultimate goal of language teaching is to nurture independent learners equipped with learning autonomy One ofthe most efficient methods adopted to foster learnerautonomy is through cooperative learning or projectwork [20] The current study, which was carried out at a Vietnamese university, investigates the extent to which learnerautonomy is fostered via theuseofprojectworkin an EFL classroom The findings ofthe study revealed that projectwork had brought students various opportunities to engage inthe whole process of conducting theproject including selecting and shaping their learning contents, building up their intrinsic motivation and boosting the self-regulation These factors could eventually allow them to become more autonomous learners As a result, learners’ English proficiency is enhanced The findings ofthe study also offer some pedagogical implications for researchers, practitioners and teachers at the Vietnamese tertiary context, who wish to employ projectworkin order to encourage learnerautonomyin their classrooms The study also meets the requirements of innovation of higher education policies in terms of reforming teaching methods and curriculum in Vietnam Keywords: Learner autonomy, Project work, Cooperative Learning, Vietnam, Tertiary Language Learners Introduction Learnerautonomy has been increasingly considered as an ultimate goal of education [2] as it has significantly contributed to learners’ process of language acquisition Autonomous learners are assumed to take responsibility for their learning as follows [2] They set their learning goal, and they identify and develop their learning strategies to achieve their goals They also identify and select relevant resources and evaluate their learning progress [2] Developing learnerautonomyin EFL classroom requires a gradual transaction from teacher-directed teaching to learner-directed learning [6], which can be observed inprojectworkProject work, a kind of learner-centredness, can provide a sound basis for thefosteringoflearnerautonomy This paper explores a case study on developing learnerautonomy via projectworkin an EFL classroom at a university in Vietnam To be more specific; it aimed to investigate effects ofprojectworkinfostering students’ autonomyin learning English Content 2.1 The Background Context The research was carried out inthe tertiary classroom context, where the researchers are currently working as lecturers of English The institution is tasked with the responsibility to teach about 10,000 undergraduates and graduates of different majors such as natural and social sciences Received February 28, 2018 Revised April 23, 2018 Accepted May 7, 2018 Contact: Corresponding author: Cao Thi Hong Phuong; email: hongphuongct@hnue.edu.vn Cao Thi Hong Phuong; Le Thi Minh Nguyet English faculty holds the responsibility to teach English to all of them to ensure that after graduation (according to the MOET of Vietnam’s 2020 Projectof language policies) they can communicate proficiently at B1 (CEFR) level Specifically, the national foreign language 2020 Project’s goal is to guarantee undergraduates entering the world ofwork to be confidently communicating in a foreign language in their daily work [11] The launch ofthe Vietnam ELT policies has exerted a profound impact on the innovation of teaching and learning inthe Vietnamese context Developing learnerautonomy is stated by policymakers and educationalists as one ofthe primary targets oftheproject Moreover, Vietnamese researchers have also problematised the constraints of teaching and learning English at the Vietnamese tertiary education level including the researchers’ professional workplace Pham [19] and Le [13] have pointed out a variety of difficulties including students’ lack of ability to speak in English and their shortage of generic skills, which results inthe inadequate the ability to learn independently Among many factors leading to poor English communicative competences, a critical reason is learners’ lack ofautonomy [7] Consequently, in response to the drastic transformation needs regarding teaching and learning approaches, projectwork as a tool to foster students’ autonomy, has been implemented universitywide 2.2 Research Aims This paper investigated the extent to which theuseofprojectwork can foster students’ autonomy It seeks to answer the research question: “How does projectwork foster autonomyof first-year non-English major students at a pedagogical university Vietnam?” The findings of this study are expected to shed light on the effectiveness ofthe utilisation ofprojectworkin enhancing learnerautonomyinthe Vietnamese context 2.3 Literature Review 2.3.1 LearnerAutonomyLearnerautonomy has been receiving an increase of attention from practitioners and researchers in ELT One classic definition ofautonomy given by Holec cited by Benson [1] is “ the ability to take charge of one’s learning” In other words, students can take responsibility for numerous learning decisions This includes deciding what, how, when and for how long to learn It means that students can establish their learning goals, select the most relevant resources and techniques to learn, choose appropriate learning strategies and evaluate the outcomes Undoubtedly, there are different levels ofautonomy Therefore, the teacher must not assume that students can learn independently without pedagogical innovation Inthe real classroom contexts, they should cooperate with students to improve and foster learning skills and strategies in learners, enabling them to become increasingly more autonomous Crabbe [5] added that the ways language learning tasks are designed might have impacts on fostering autonomous learning Teachers also play an essential part in achieving the goal offosteringlearnerautonomyin classroom practice 2.3.2 ProjectWorkIn EFL and ESL contexts, many researchers have emphasised the significance ofprojectwork or cooperative learning as a tool for the “mutual engagement of participants in a coordinated effort to solve the problem together” [20, 7] Interaction among group members plays an integral part inthe success of cooperative learning [10] Projectwork is “student-centred and driven by the need to create an end-product” [9, 6], which is not only targeted for the solution to the real-life problems, but also for the enhancement oflearnerautonomy Using ProjectWork to Foster LearnerAutonomy at a Pedagogical University, Vietnam: A Case Study Since projectwork is considered a vehicle for integrated language, it requires learners to usethe target language to communicate When working in groups, students need various skills to plan, organise, negotiate with other members for the strategies, ideas, make their decisions of what to perform, who will take responsibility for each task, and how information will be investigated and presented [21] Because ofthe collaborative character ofproject work, learnerautonomy can occur even among learners at low levels of language proficiency Research in language learning suggests that cooperative tasks promote achievement, positive behaviour, and efficient outcome For example, theproject by Legutke [12, 1] called “English just around the corner: the classroom as a place ofthe encounter was conducted with high school German students who did a project at the airport interviewing different people from various countries The study concluded that students could develop their autonomy by making decisions to achieve common interests such as writing articles and designing their magazines at the end oftheprojectThe outcomes ofprojectwork have also been evidenced inthe Vietnamese tertiary context, where students conducted their project [13] under the supervision of their lecturers The study found that students’ autonomy was increasingly fostered, as they could brainstorm their ideas, searched for relevant project materials Most importantly, they had a chance to present the products of their projects, thus improving both independent skills and language performance [13] In summary, projectwork dramatically benefits students in improving their autonomous learning ability and language outcomes [17] 2.4 Methodology 2.4.1 Research Design This study is carried out as a case study research The data were collected and analysed by semi-structured interviews and surveys from the participants The interviews were conducted inthe Vietnamese language Among 15 participants, three participants Nguyen, Tran and Le (pseudonyms) were selected to participate inthe interview as they were group leaders and they could represent their group voices This study employed both quantitative and qualitative analysis, which is driven by theoretical research and analytic phenomena in a range of possible areas First, the interviews were transcribed and translated into English, then the data were coded, and themes emerged To triangulate the data collection procedure, the constant variables are ensured ofthe same teacher, the same project, the consistency regarding the criteria of feedback inprojectwork as well as the criteria to assess the students’ oral presentation Next, the data from the survey respondents were collected and analysed The analysis ofthe data showed that some development oflearnerautonomy resulted from the cooperation among group members and the actions taken in this research projectLearnerautonomy was thus reflected in two significant features from students’ perspectives, which will be discussed inthe following section The details oftheproject are provided inthe following table No of students 15 (6 males, females) Level A2, CEFR Duration 15 weeks Weekly contact hours 03 Time for projectwork hour a week Time for presentation 30 minutes/group Projectwork implementation Week 1- Week 12 Cao Thi Hong Phuong; Le Thi Minh Nguyet Presentation Survey questionnaires Week 13 Week 14 Interview Week 15 Table 1: Details oftheprojectwork for EAP course 2.4.2 Participants and Implementation The participants inthe study are 15 students majoring in sciences They are first-year university students (18-19 years of age) They are proven to be at the same level of English proficiency according to their entrance exam scores Their scores indicate that they are of CEFR A2 users of English For project work, the students are divided into three groups of mixed gender During the first week, the teacher gave briefings on project work’s framework, topics, groupings and assessment The teacher provided the components that could be incorporated into theprojectwork framework Four focusing criteria will be used inthe entire process of conducting and presenting theprojectwork are content, language, organisation and resources (see table 2) The topic given to the students were topics related to those from the course book A2-B1, which is used to teach students ofthe A2 level at tertiary level nationwide The groups of students selected the topic oftheproject that they would like to work on as well as the form of products they wanted to present such as PowerPoint, magazines and video clips For theprojectwork implementation, students worked in groups of five to conduct their projectworkThe topics oftheproject were selected by the students at the briefing session at the beginning ofthe semester In groups, members discussed the purposes and nature ofprojectwork and identified key features of effective presentation ofprojectwork Each group met three times to conduct their peer feedback sessions according to four criteria namely contents, language, organisation and resources At the end ofthe course, students were tested via oral presentation of their projects Each of them received scores according to the four criteria COMPONENTS DETAILS Contents To apply knowledge across different subject areas To acquire relevant information from the related domain Language To give a clear and efficient presentation using appropriate language use namely grammar, pronunciation, vocabulary and structures To present a coherent report inthe spoken form Organisation To show a good understanding ofthe topic, summarising relevant characteristics Propose the outline oftheproject Design methodology and methodological rationales Analyse feasibility and manageability oftheproject Explain why it is the best solution given the circumstances Show relevance to task requirements Analyse the impact oftheproject on the Society Resources Summarise relevant literature Draw links Identify gaps inthe literature Using ProjectWork to Foster LearnerAutonomy at a Pedagogical University, Vietnam: A Case Study Discuss the relevance of literature to task requirements and research process Table 2: Projectwork framework (adapted from Pillai et al [20] Students are required to give feedback to their peers according to the four criteria during the three sessions They will exchange their feedback for the improvement oftheproject Table below elaborates the feedback criteria checklist that students will use during the feedback sessions (adapted from McCallum, 2015) Name of group: _ Topic: _ Feedback session no: Criteria Success Met Not Met Comments/ suggestions Contents Language Organisation Resources Reflection Table 3: Group Peer-Feedback Criteria Checklist ( adapted from McCallum, [17] 2.4.3 Rubrics for Presentation Test In week 12, each group is required to give an oral presentation of their group project work; each student must contribute to the oral presentation, which will be assessed according to the four criteria discussed above Table below shows the assessment criteria for the oral presentation Criteria No- mark Approaching Expectation Meeting Expectation Criteria have not been made Needs focusing on the contents Mainly focuses on the contents Exceeding Expectation Individuals Contents 15 Focuses on the contexts with highlight Cao Thi Hong Phuong; Le Thi Minh Nguyet Language 15 Criteria have not been made Speaks haltingly and/ or mumbles, It is difficult to understand at times Can only manage very short, isolated words and phrases, structures Speaks clearly and intelligibly most ofthe time Shows some attempts to express complex ideas, despite evident hesitations for grammatical and lexical planning Deals with presentation with ease, remarkable fluency, accuracy extended stretches of language with occasional repetition Produces extended response using simple structure Organisation 10 Criteria have not been made Generally appropriate organization appropriate organisation Very clear organisation Resources 10 Criteria have not been made Quite relevant resources Relevant resources Variety of relevant resources Total Scores Table 4: Assessment Rubrics for Oral Presentation (adapted from Pillai et al [20] 2.5 Findings & Discussion In this section, the paper discusses the key findings drawing on the survey as well as the interview data with the participants The survey revealed positive feedback on the projects regarding their self-learning capacity and attitude With respect to learner autonomy, all three interviewees believed that it was related to learners’ ability to make their decisions of which resources they could select for their project work, they can evaluate their work via working with their peers and through their peer feedback during theprojectwork preparation They also thought that presenting their project work; they can improve their language skills The following themes would be discussed in light of relevant literature 2.5.1 Learner engagement inprojectworkLearner involvement in learning process seems to be a basic pedagogical principle infosteringlearnerautonomyThe involvement is the prerequisite for the development of cooperative learning, intrinsic motivation and self-regulation from the learners, which In turn, effectively boost learner’s autonomy Cooperative Learning Projectwork offers the opportunities for students to workin a team to reach a common goal and make the learning decisions and strategies together Little [15] stated that engaging learners inthe process of learning activities, which students can share ideas, discuss, analyse and evaluate with their peers inthe target language could be an efficient way for students to become autonomous learners This can be observed inthe following statement made by Nguyen: Using ProjectWork to Foster LearnerAutonomy at a Pedagogical University, Vietnam: A Case Study “The project requires us to work together from the beginning to the end… We discuss ideas, problems, search materials for theproject and prepare the presentation We cooperate with each other, everyone involved and contributed to the workload.” Nguyen’s statement indicates that the engagement of different members ofthe group, who cooperate with each other, can enable learners to fulfill their tasks more efficiently In other words, they have the opportunities to learn from each other by sharing their ideas of how to complete theproject This confirmed the findings in Borg & Alshumaimeri [3], which indicates that reasons for learnerautonomy promotion are through group work cooperation, resulting inthe development oflearnerautonomy This is also aligned with Chan [4], which claimed that the involvement of students inthe group learning tasks and group presentation could foster autonomy This study concluded that the discussions among group members encouraged exchanges of views, developed negotiation skills and put students in charge ofthe task, all of which can lead to fosteringlearnerautonomy Tran’s opinion’s displays a substantial alignment with Borg & Alshumaimeri [3] suggesting crucial elements promoting learnerautonomy when he stated that: “I could be involved in evaluating my work and my friends’ work also because we give feedback during theproject I could decide the topic ofthe project.” This can also be reflected on Borg & Alshumaimeri [3,12], which mentioned teachers’ common conceptions oflearnerautonomy including the “involving learners in decisions about what they learn and how” The finding from the survey with 15 students inthe class resonates the positive impact ofprojectwork on fostering cooperative learning during the course when all students agreed that they accomplished theproject by cooperating with their teammates and the degree of cooperation was more intense than that in their typical English classroom Also, 100% ofthe respondents claimed that theproject was carried out and completed by their joint decisions The process oftheproject is claimed to be student-centred and student-driven with the teacher playing the role of a project coordinator, informant, observer and facilitator when necessary Intrinsic Motivation Intrinsic motivation is a crucial factor that allows learners to learn autonomously [8, 64] In contrast to the traditional teacher-centred approaches inthe ESL classrooms in Vietnam, projectbased ones nurture learners’ interest and motivation from inside The first step in a project is selecting the topic oftheproject by the students themselves, which allows them to focus on the topic of their real interest Tran’s answer reflects this idea: “We made a list of topic that we liked to know more about and voted to choose the topic for theprojectofthe group I think because we could choose the topic, all of us became more excited, and we all work harder on the project.” Moreover, the development of internal drive for learning English is also evident inthe postproject period given Nguyen’s statement that: “I found learning English much more friendly and less challenging after finishing theproject I used to learn English just because I had to and for the good grades but now I know that I can learn a lot if can use English well.” The student’s desire to learn the foreign language of English and accomplish more significant goals in their learning following theproject works as a result of boosted intrinsic motivation is also shown inthe survey data Specifically, more than 93% ofthe students acknowledged that they enjoyed working on theproject because of their interest intheproject topic and the cooperation with their classmates More importantly, over 86% ofthe responses reflect the growth of popularity of learning English among the students as a result of accomplishing theproject Cao Thi Hong Phuong; Le Thi Minh Nguyet Self-regulation A self-regulated learner tries to independently progress in a language classroom by “finding strategies to cope with their learning difficulties” [8, 63] When encountering a specific situation, instead of asking for teacher’s support, he would rather work on his own or discuss within his team to identify the advantages and disadvantages and eventually work out the solutions to the problems Tran and Nguyen shared the similar experience in implementing their projects: “When we made the video clip, the final product of our project, we did not have any idea We did not know the software to make videos or how to collect necessary images and footages However, we tried to search for the information on the Internet, asked our friends and discussed in our group Finally, we could produce a video clip of online business.” (Tran) “At first when we decided to research the environmental problems of Hanoi city, we did not know what to talk about Then we talked to our friends and read articles on the Internet to find the ideas for our project We also tried to borrow cameras from our families to take photos for the projects.” (Nguyen) Learning autonomy has been successfully fostered when learners became more proactive in their learning, taking charge of their own learning progress, identifying the challenges and independently seek the solutions to their problems According to the questionnaire, more than 93% ofthe students stated that they made an effort to solve the problems in implementing their projects without consulting their teacher In summary, the findings revealed that participants mostly referred to their opportunities to get engaged and active inthe whole process of conducting theproject including choosing and shaping their learning contents[14], building up their internal learning motivation and boosting the self-regulation These factors could enable them to become more autonomous learners Additionally, they also claimed that their language skills could be enhanced 2.5.2 Language skills improvement Language learning gains in independent learning programs have been acknowledged by many researchers [1], [19] Specifically, an experimental study into a Vietnamese university classroom by Nguyen & Gu [19] found that besides the improvement in study skills, students also gained better achievements in their writing ability Reflecting on the conversations with Le’s statement, their language skills were also improved “I myself learned a lot by doing this projectwork When I have to present, my pronunciation seems to be better I think our group also improves our grammar because we can self-correct the mistakes after my friends’ feedback.” Le’s statement indicates that working with their peers during projectwork allows them to overcome their drawbacks and to be more conscious about their study Thus they can make progress Analysing Nguyen and Tran ’s interview data also revealed that they could improve their accuracy in speaking: “We rehearsed our presentation; we got feedback from our group members Therefore, we speak more accurately." The analysis indicates that their linguistic competence could be enhanced, which confirmed the findings in [24], which argued that projectwork could be a versatile vehicle for fully integrated language interaction promoting language improvement by students' active involvement The analysis also shows a substantial alignment with [25], which concluded that the group work activities inthe author's classroom, could help improve the students’ communication skills day by day Empirically speaking, at the end ofthe project, more than 86% ofthe respondents believed that their English skills had been upgraded Using ProjectWork to Foster LearnerAutonomy at a Pedagogical University, Vietnam: A Case Study Overall, the participants’ interview data reflect Little’s [15, 2] primary pedagogical principles of “learner involvement” in sharing responsibility for completing theprojectwork and “appropriate target language use.” Both of them are essential elements entailed by fosteringlearnerautonomyin language classroom settings Implications, Limitations and Conclusions The study aimed to examine the role ofprojectwork on fosteringlearnerautonomyin an EFL classroom at the Vietnamese setting, where English is still considered as a compulsory subject in tertiary education This study has shown that the application ofprojectwork can be exploited combined with the content ofthe syllabus Instead of a teacher-led classroom, we can encourage students to direct their learning with teacher’s support and guidance Thus, the pedagogical effects ofprojectwork may benefit both students and teachers Teachers may reduce their working load through theproject compared to traditional regular pedagogic approach More significantly, projectwork may not only foster students’ autonomy but also could enhance their English language proficiency Reflections from the students and teachers-researchers who evaluated and assessed the presentation confirmed that the students loved doing theproject and liked being engaged in conducting theproject Moreover, the study may also meet the requirements of policies of higher education reform regarding reforming teaching methods and curriculum in this context Language teachers inthe Vietnamese context, then, need to reflect on how to design and define the objectives ofthe course, materials, tasks and methodology in relation to the enhancement oflearnerautonomyThe paper also has some limitations The small number of participants might not generalise the findings Other criteria such as analysis of students’ final products should be considered However, this study yields significant results as it showed a congruency with the fundamental principles infosteringlearnerautonomyin a language classroom In sum, projectwork can offer students opportunities to learn autonomously and improve their linguistic competence Inthe Vietnamese context, which still focuses on teacher-centred instruction [13], teacher’s role is crucial in encouraging students to become more autonomous learners We would end the paper by citing [14, 17] which stated that the pursue oflearnerautonomy requires a drastic change in teacher’s role from “purveyor of information to a facilitator of learning and manager of learning resources” REFERENCES [1] Benson, P (2007) Autonomyin language teaching and learning Language Teaching, 40(01), 21 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958 [2] Benson, P (2011) Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed) New York: Longman [3] Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y (2017) Language learnerautonomyin a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices Language Teaching Research, 136216881772575 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759 [4] Chan, V (2000) FosteringLearnerAutonomyin an ESL Classroom TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 75 https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v18i1.901 [5] Crabbe, D (1993) Fosteringautonomy from within the classroom: The teacher’s responsibility System, 21(4), 443–452 https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90056-M [6] Dam, L (1995) Learner autonomy: From theory to classroom practice (Vol 3) Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources [7] Dang, V H (2006) Learner-centeredness and EFL instruction in Vietnam: A case study International Education Journal, 7(4), 598-610 Cao Thi Hong Phuong; Le Thi Minh Nguyet [8] Díaz Ramírez, M I (2014) Developing learnerautonomy through projectworkin an ESP class How, 21(2), 54-73 [9] Fried-Booth, D L (2012) Projectwork (2 ed) Oxford: OUP [10] Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P A., & Jochems, W (2003) Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review ofthe research Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353 https://doi.org/10.1016/S07475632(02)00057-2 [11] Le Ha, P., Ha, V H., & Dat, B (2014) Language Policies in Modern-day Vietnam: Changes, Challenges and Complexities In P Sercombe & R Tupas (Eds.), Language, Education and Nation-building (pp 232–244) London: Palgrave Macmillan UK https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455536_12 [12] Legutke, M K (2005) Redesigning the foreign language classroom: A critical perspective on information technology and educational change Information technology and innovation in language education, 127-148 [13] Le, X Q (2013) Fosteringlearnerautonomyin language learning in tertiary education: an intervention study of university students in Hochiminh City, Vietnam PhD thesis, University of Nottingham [14] Little, D (1995) Learning as dialogue: The dependence oflearnerautonomy on teacher autonomy System, 23(2), 175-181 [15] Little, D (2006) Learner autonomy: Drawing together the threads of self-assessment, goalsetting and reflection European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML, Hrsg.), Training teachers to usethe European Language Portfolio [16] Littlewood, W (1996) “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework System, 24(4), 427– 435 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00039-5 [17] McCallum, D (2015) The feedback-friendly classroom: how to equip students to give, receive, and seek quality feedback that will support their social, academic, and developmental needs Markham, Ontario: Pembroke Publishers [18] Musa, F., Mufti, N., Latiff, R A., & Amin, M M (2012) Project-based Learning (PjBL): Inculcating Soft Skills in 21st Century Workplace Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 565–573 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315 [19] Nguyen, L T C., & Gu, Y (2013) Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learnerautonomy Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528 [20] Pillai, A D., Ellis, M., & Tan, O S (2009) Project work: exploring processes, practices and strategies Singapore: Prentice Hall [21] Pham, N T (2009) The Higher Education Reform Agenda: A Vision for 2020 In G Harman (Ed.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam: Challenges and Priorities (pp 5164) Springer [22] Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S D (1995) The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving In C O’Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp 69–97) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 [23] Stein, S G (1995) Equipped for the future: A customer-driven vision for adult literacy and lifelong learning DIANE Publishing [24] Stoller, F (2002) Project work: A means to promote language and content Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 107-119 10 Using ProjectWork to Foster LearnerAutonomy at a Pedagogical University, Vietnam: A Case Study [25] Yagcioglu, O (2015) New Approaches on LearnerAutonomyin Language Learning Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 428–435 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.529 ÁP DỤNG DỰ ÁN HỌC TẬP NHẰM NÂNG CAO TÍNH TỰ GIÁC TRONG HỌC TẬP TẠI MỘT TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM, VIỆT NAM Tóm tắt: Mục tiêu cuối hoạt động giáo dục đào tạo người học tự chủ với tính tự giác học tập Một phương pháp thúc đẩy tính tự giác người học sử dụng rộng rãi hình thức học tập hợp tác hay gọi học qua dự án [20] Nghiên cứu tiến hành trường đại học sư phạm Việt Nam, nhằm mục đích điều tra mức độ hiệu việc thúc đẩy tính tự giác người học hình thức học qua dự án Nghiên cứu tiến hành lớp học Tiếng Anh sinh viên không chuyên Tiếng Anh Nghiên cứu ghi nhận thành cơng hình thức học qua dự án việc tạo hội để người học tham gia vào toàn trình thực dự án, từ việc lựa chọn định hình nội dung học, tạo dựng động lực bên cho người học nâng cao lực tự quản lý trình học tập họ Những yếu tố kết hợp tạo người học tự giác với kỹ Tiếng Anh cải thiện đáng kể Kết nghiên cứu nguồn tham khảo cho giáo viên Việt Nam việc áp dụng dạy học dự án vào lớp học Tiếng Anh Ngồi ra, nghiên cứu đáp ứng nhu cầu đổi phương pháp dạy học cải tiến chương trình mơi trường giảng dạy ngoại ngữ bậc đại học Việt Nam Từ khố: tính tự giác học tập, Dự án, học tập hợp tác, Vietnam, ĐH SP 11 ... conceptions of learner autonomy including the “involving learners in decisions about what they learn and how” The finding from the survey with 15 students in the class resonates the positive impact of project. .. enjoyed working on the project because of their interest in the project topic and the cooperation with their classmates More importantly, over 86% of the responses reflect the growth of popularity of. .. evaluate their work via working with their peers and through their peer feedback during the project work preparation They also thought that presenting their project work; they can improve their