Chapter Real, Personal and Intellectual Property © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma Timothy Ackers is a “stay-at-home dad” living in Falling Waters subdivision in Olympia, Washington Timothy’s wife Julia earns a six-figure income at the largest accounting firm in Olympia, and both husband and wife feel fortunate that one of them is able to stay at home with their two young children, four-year-old Hope and two-year-old Matthew Timothy is part of the community watch organization in his subdivision, and as a stay-at-home parent, he has ample opportunity to observe the daily neighborhood “goings-on.” For the past six months, Timothy has noticed heightened activity at the house down the street owed by the Penningtons (Clara and Jonathan;) approximately eight to twelve cars come and go from the Pennington driveway every day, and four months ago, handicapped access ramps were installed at the front and back entrances to the home On several occasions, Timothy has seen elderly people sitting in wheelchairs in the Penningtons’ front yard Curious, Timothy knocks on the front door of the Pennington home one Monday morning Clara Pennington answers Ackers states “Good morning, Clara I know the old saying that ‘curiosity killed the cat,’ but I can’t help myself What’s going on at your house? Why are all the elderly people here? I though both of your parents were deceased, and I thought Jonathan’s parents had ‘passed on’ as well Are these people related to you?” Clara responds: “Timothy, Jonathan and I decided six months ago to open up an elderly care facility We didn’t have the money to purchase a separate building, so we decided to care for the elderly in our home This gives me a wonderful opportunity to stay at home, and I wouldn’t be able to that just on Jonathan’s income Plus, think of the advantages for our clients Isn’t this so much better than a regular rest home? These folks have cried tears of joy, and they thank me every day for providing them the quality of care they had hoped for in their ‘golden years.’” Falling Waters subdivision is zoned exclusively residential Should Timothy report the Penningtons’ zoning violation? What ethical issues are involved in Timothy’s decision? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma John “Jack” Franklin and Ruby Huss are next-door neighbors Jack’s narrow road from the state-maintained highway to his house is approximately two-tenths of one (1) mile long, and runs along the edge of his property On the left side of Jack’s road is a drainage ditch running the length of his road, while on the right side is the property line dividing the two neighbors’ landholdings One day, Ruby was out gardening (she loved to cultivate roses) and Jack approached her with the following question “Ruby, I am going to have my road graveled, and I would like lay enough gravel to expand my road about four feet in width I can’t expand it on the left side because of the drainage ditch, so I was wondering if you would mind if I widened the road on the right side It sure would mean a lot to me, since my road is so narrow right now that I have a hard time driving my truck up to the house.” This meant that the gravel would extend approximately four feet onto Ruby’s property Ruby believed in the power and value of friendly neighborly relations She responded, “Yes Jack, you may certainly that That gravel won’t me or my property any harm Tell Ann and the kids (Jack’s wife and children) I said hello when you get back to the house.” Based on the facts presented, is Ruby’s four-foot-wide strip of land subject to Jack’s adverse possession of it? If the gravel remains on this strip of land for the statutorily-prescribed period of time for adverse possession (twenty years in many states), will Jack become its owner? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical Jason Binghamton is a huge fan of the Montana State Teacher’s College (M.S.T.C.) men’s basketball team, nicknamed the “Flying Elk.” The M.S.T.C team has enjoyed the best season in its 52-year history, and they are a favorite to win the Lewis and Clark League (L.C.L.) men’s basketball title In fact, the team has advanced to the L.C.L men’s basketball tournament championship, a contest against the Billings Technical College “Fighting Prairie Dogs.” Jason drives to the championship game at Lewis and Clark Stadium in Helena, Montana He approaches the stadium parking lot, and pays the attendant $25 for parking; in return, the attendant hands Jason a parking stub On the back of the stub is the following language: “Lewis and Clark Stadium and the city of Helena shall not be held liable in any way for loss of or damage to visitor’s property, including loss of or damage to automobiles parked in the stadium parking lot In accepting this parking privilege, the patron agrees that he will hold harmless Lewis and Clark Stadium, and the city of Helena, for such damage.” Jason does not read the language on the parking stub; instead, he places the ticket on his dashboard, parks his car in area B1 of the lot, locks the car doors and puts his keys in his pocket, and heads to the stadium By all accounts, the game is the proudest moment in the history of the Flying Elk They defeat the Fighting Prairie Dogs 82 to 58, and Binghamton leaves the stadium ecstatic, knowing he attends a college of “winners.” Upon returning to his car, Jason’ happiness deflates to consternation and anger His windshield has been shattered by a stuffed and mounted prairie dog that now lays upside-down in his driver’s seat, along with countless shards of broken glass It is obvious to Jason that the “deed was done” by some disgruntled Fighting Prairie Dog fan, but that individual is probably well on his way back to Billings by now, and he will never be able to locate the criminal Jason files suit against Lewis and Clark Stadium and the city of Helena, Montana, seeking to hold the defendants “jointly and severally” liable for the damage to his automobile Will he win the lawsuit? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical The American Pistol Association (APA), a gun-rights activist organization, is headquartered in Laramie, Wyoming The APA held a ceremonial luncheon at its headquarters, and invited a host of Second Amendment advocates, including the former governor of Wyoming, Sara M Caine Dubbed “The Renegade” by her avid supporters, most believed that Sara would make a presidential run in the next election Known more for her public proclamations than her actual governing acumen, Sara is most-remembered for leading a gun-rights demonstration in Wyoming’s state capital, Cheyenne, at which time she held her Chesterfield rifle above her head and announced that before government officials took her gun away, they would first have to deal with her “sharp, red fingernails!” As a key part of the ceremony, the APA honored Sara M Caine’s efforts to uphold the Second Amendment The APA’s president, Charles T Hess, presented Sara with a “Bronco 55” pistol, proudly manufactured in the United States of America Sara enthusiastically accepted the Bronco 55 After the ceremony, Charles approached Sara and informed her that although his organization had planned to get the gun engraved with her initials on each side of its ivory handle before the presentation, the person they had chosen to the work, Edward “Wild Eddie” Cody, had been away on vacation He further told Sara that if she would hand the gun to him, he would get Wild Eddie to engrave the gun when he returned from vacation, and return it to her as soon as possible Sara happily agreed, and transferred the gun to Charles Charles put the gun in his office desk at APA headquarters That night, an unknown perpetrator burglarized APA headquarters, taking only the Bronco 55 Charles suspected the thief was Jean Gigot, a vocal, well-known opponent of gun rights who had moved from Dijon, France to Laramie several months ago During his presentation of the Bronco 55 to Sara, Charles had observed Jean lurking in the back of the dining room, furtively and feverishly pacing back and forth From a legal standpoint, must The American Pistol Association or Charles T Hess answer to Sara M Caine for the theft of the gun? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical Bernie Sides is a restaurant entrepreneur and an avid Civil War buff Over the years, Bernie has collected a “treasure trove” of Civil War memorabilia, and he decides to combine his passions for restaurant ownership and Civil War history by opening a new restaurant called the “Hardtack Café” (“hardtack” is a hard, unsalted biscuit used as a staple for Civil War army rations.) Sides has devised a logo for the restaurant, and the logo (a yellow circle with red lettering for the name of the restaurant) bears a striking resemblance to a certain “rock and roll” themed restaurant of a similar name and logo Upon discovering the existence of the new restaurant, attorneys for the rock and roll restaurant immediately sue, requesting 1) a temporary injunction (a court order mandating that the Hardtack Café cease and desist from using its name and logo, pending the outcome of the litigation; 2) a permanent injunction (a court judgment that the Hardtack Café forever cease and desist from using its name and logo;) and 3) money damages representing all profit the Hardtack Café has earned during its existence Who wins, and why? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical Davidson’s Microbrew, Inc is a small beer manufacturer located in Denver, Colorado The owner of Davidson’s Microbrew, Benjamin Davidson, takes great pride in offering the public a variety of beers, including a particular one that is currently the subject of litigation “Barley-Davidson” is a dark brew closely resembling motor oil in its appearance For the past three (3) years, Barley-Davidson has been sold in orange cans There is a “bar-and-shield” logo on the can’s front closely resembling the iconic Harley-Davidson logo; in the “bar” portion of the logo, the “Barley-Davidson” name appears, and the words “Asphalt-Dark Beer” appear in the “shield” portion of the logo On the back of the can, in small but legible print, the following disclaimer appears: “Not affiliated with Harley-Davidson Motor Company.” Barley-Davidson has become Davidson’s Microbrew’s most popular product, selling approximately 250,000 units per year In its lawsuit against Davidson’s Microbrew, Harley-Davidson has requested an injunction (temporary, pending litigation, and permanent, post-litigation) and money damages based on all profits generated by the defendant in its sale of Barley-Davidson Davidson’s Microbrew’s defense is based on four (4) contentions: first, its product (beer) is distinguishable from Harley-Davidson’s product (motorcycles); second, its product disclaimer (indicating its non-affiliation with Harley-Davidson Motor Company) is displayed on every can of Barley-Davidson it sells; third, the “Barley” portion of its dark beer’s name has nothing to with Harley-Davidson; and four, the “Davidson” portion of the beer’s name is proudly associated with the name of the microbrew’s company, and the last name of the microbrew’s founder himself What is the likely result of the litigation? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Real Property Definition: Land and everything permanently attached to it © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Extent of Land Ownership •Surface Rights •Airspace •Water Rights Mineral Rights (Subsurface Rights) â 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Interests In Real Property •Fee Simple Absolute: Right to possess for life and devise (will) to heirs upon death; the most complete interest in real property •Conditional Estate: Interest comparable to fee simple absolute, except that interest will terminate on occurrence/non-occurrence of a specified condition •Life Estate: Granted for lifetime of an individual; right to possess property terminates upon life estate holder’s death, and property will pass to another party designated by original grantor © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 10 Personal Property Definition: All property that is not land or not permanently affixed to land © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 16 Types of Personal Property • Tangible: Property identified by the senses (Examples include furniture and automobiles) • Intangible: Property not identified by the senses (Examples include bank accounts and stocks) © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 17 Voluntary Transfer of Property • Purchase: Buyer gives consideration to seller in exchange for title to property • Gift: Donee gives no consideration to donor in exchange for title to property © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 18 Elements Required for Valid Gift • Delivery • Donative Intent • Acceptance © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 19 Involuntary Transfer of Personal Property • • • Abandoned Property: Property the owner has discarded Lost Property: Property the owner has unknowingly or accidentally left somewhere Mislaid Property: Property the owner has intentionally placed somewhere but forgotten its location © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 20 Intellectual Property © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 21 Intellectual Property Definition: Property that comes from creativity © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 22 Types of Intellectual Property •Trademarks •Trade Dress •Copyrights •Patents •Trade Secrets © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 23 Trademark •Definition: A distinctive mark, word, design, picture, or arrangement used by seller in conjunction with a product and tending to cause consumer to identify product with producer •Mark must be registered with U.S Patent and Trademark Office; mark must be renewed between fifth and sixth years, and after initial renewal, every 10 years Remedies for mark infringement: -Money Damages -Injunction â 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 24 Trade Dress •Refers to the overall appearance and image of a product •Entitled to same protection as trademark •Main focus of trade dress infringement case is whether there is likely to be consumer confusion in the comparison of two products © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 25 Copyright •Protects the expression of a creative idea •Examples of copyrighted material include books, periodicals, musical compositions, plays, motion pictures, sound recordings, lectures, works of art, and computer programs •Criteria for a work to be copyrightable: -Fixed (Set out in a tangible medium of expression) -Original -Creative •Remedies for copyright infringement: •Money Damages Injunction â 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 26 The “Fair Use” Doctrine Provides that a portion of copyrighted work may be reproduced for purposes of “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarships, and research” © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 27 “Fair Use” Factors •Purpose and character of use, including whether use is of a commercial nature or for nonprofit educational purposes •Nature of the copyrighted work •Amount and substantiality of portion used in relation to copyrighted work as a whole •Effect of use on potential market for or value of copyrighted work © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 28 Patent •Protects a “product, process, invention, machine, or plant” that is “novel, useful, and non-obvious” •Length of protection: 20 years •Remedies for patent infringement: -Money Damages -Injunction © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 29 Trade Secret •Alternative to patent protection •Definition: A process, product, method of operation, or compilation of information that gives a businessperson an advantage over his or her competitors •Remedies for trade secret infringement: -Money Damages -Injunction •Allows holder to sue for violation, if owner can prove: -Trade secret existed -Defendant acquired trade secret through unlawful means -Defendant used trade secret without plaintiff’s permission © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved 30 ... severally” liable for the damage to his automobile Will he win the lawsuit? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical The American Pistol Association (APA),... issues are involved in Timothy’s decision? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma John “Jack” Franklin and Ruby Huss are next-door neighbors... states), will Jack become its owner? © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc All rights reserved Chapter Case Hypothetical Jason Binghamton is a huge fan of the Montana State Teacher’s College