THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng | |
---|---|
Số trang | 285 |
Dung lượng | 31,57 MB |
Nội dung
Ngày đăng: 16/01/2018, 08:54
Nguồn tham khảo
Tài liệu tham khảo | Loại | Chi tiết | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12. Chartier, D. and Notehelfer F. (2006). ‘Authentication: Science and Art at odds’, in McCrone W (ed.), Scientific Detection of Forgery in Art, SPIE Press, pp. 3315–3409 | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
13. Boime, A. and Kossolapov, A. (2003). ‘Manet’s Lost Infanta’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 42(3), 407–418 | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
17. Wieseman, M. E. (2010). A Closer Look: Deceptions and Discoveries, National Gallery, Yale University Press, London, p. 9 | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
19. Joanna, E., Brian, R. S., Singer, W., Perry, J. J. and Bacon, A. (2012). ‘The Materials and Techniques Used in the Paintings of Francis Bacon (1909–1992)’, Studies in Conservation, 57(4), 207–217 | Sách, tạp chí |
|
||||||
3. Alberge, D. (2014). ‘Revealed: The art experts who pass fakes as authentic. Dubious data and selective use of evidence lead to forger- ies being attributed to masters’. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/feb/23/art-scholars-disgrace-forgeries [accessed 2 May 2014] | Link | |||||||
11. Saverwyns, S. and Fremout, W. (2011). ‘Genuine or fake: A micro- Raman spectroscopy study of an abstract painting attributed to Vasily Kandinsky’. Available at: http://www.ndt.net/article/art2011/papers/SAVERWYNS%20-%20M%208.pdf [accessed 4 September 2014] | Link | |||||||
14. Authentication in Art (2014). ‘Congress poster of The Hague Congress on Authenticity in Art’. Available at: http://www.authenticationinart.org/congress-2014/ [accessed 14 September 2014] | Link | |||||||
15. Slogett, R. and Kowalski, V. (2014). ‘Building evidence for use in criminal cases — standard practice and methodologies — a case study in Australia’. Available at: http://www.authenticationinart.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/20140313-Congress-programme.pdf [accessed 14 September 2014] | Link | |||||||
16. Eastaugh, N. (2014). ‘A materialist perspective: Developing a theo- retical framework for technical art history’s role in authentication’.Available at: http://www.authenticationinart.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/20140313-Congress-programme.pdf [accessed 14 September 2014] | Link | |||||||
20. Stege, H. (2014). ‘Authenticity expertises at the Doerner Institute — a look on current practice and future necessities with focus on organic pigment analyses’. Available at: http://www.authenticationinart.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/20140313-Congress-programme.pdf [accessed 14 September 2014] | Link | |||||||
21. Kieniewicz, J. (2012). ‘The how of science and art’. Available at: http://blogs.plos.org/attheinterface/2012/12/06/the-how-of- science-and-art/ [accessed 4 April 2014] | Link | |||||||
22. Matthaes, G. (2014). ‘At the service of art’. Available at: http://www.matthaes.org/ [accessed 4 April 2014] | Link | |||||||
23. Martin Luther King, Jr. ‘Quotes’. Available at: http://mlkday.gov/plan/library/communications/quotes.php [accessed 30 October 2014] | Link | |||||||
10. Eastaugh, N. (2014). Director of Research at Art Access & Research, e-mail sent to Jehane Ragai, 14 July 2014 | Khác | |||||||
18. Ardid, M., Ferrero, J. L., Juanes, D., Roldán, C., Crespo, M., Pernett, M. E., Marzal, M., Burke, M., Rovira, S. and Vives, R. (2014).‘Identification of forged works of art by portable EDXRF spectrome- try’. Available at: www.icdd.com/resources/axa/vol46/v46_56.pdf[accessed 31 October 2014] | Khác |
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN