ύ୯ЎϯεᏢπᏢଣᐒఓπำᏢسኧՏᐒႝᅺγ! ᅺγፕЎ! Master’s Thesis Graduate Institute of Digital Mechatronic Technology College of Engineering Chinese Culture University ඵችᐒᏔΓҔϐௗ߈གᏔૈ܄᠘!ۓ Performanceidentificationofproximitysensorforamobilerobot ࡰᏤ௲: ᗛమ݄! Advisor: Professor Tsing-Tshih Tsung ࣴ!!زғǺٜᚶ! Graduate Student: Nguyen Hoai ύ҇୯ 215 ԃ 12 Д! January, 2015 i ABSTRACT Fora control system, using the static performanceofasensor is always a milestone of dynamic performanceof the system The static performanceofaproximitysensor plays an important role due to it affects the dynamic properties quality ofamobilerobot and the results of dynamic identificationAproximitysensor is a common sensor to search a metal guideline foramobilerobot If the signal ofaproximitysensor is unstable or noisy, it gets more disturbances foramobilerobot control In this study, the hand-made measurement system is successful developed, and types of metals are measured Beside, through a detailed study of theoretical knowledge and by some empirical methods of the conveyor belt sytem, the relationship of the parameters can be determined, such as: velocity, sensing distance, dimension of material, thickness of material, and so on Through measurement, the static and dynamic performances ofaproximitysensor can be fast evaluated and analyzed, respectively The experimental results show that the signals of ferrous, non-ferrous and alloy metal tape have giant differences Simultaneously, for the dynamic measurement, the shape as the output signal depends both the type ofsensor being used and thickness of material, velocity, sensing distance Determining how to rapidly and efficiently control amobilerobot therefore becomes the key point in using the measurement technique of static and dynamic performance In the future, to exploit the effectiveness of using proximity sensors, multiple coils are arranged in a row to precisely measure the horizontal displacement ofa metal target to a tenth ofa millimeter A micro-controller evaluates the damping of the different coils by the target and thereby calculates the exact position The measurement result is independent on the precision of the vertical guidance of the target Keywords: identificationof the sensor, static performance, inductive proximity sensor, mobile robot, dynamic performance ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my master thesis advisor, Prof Tsing-Tshih Tsung I have learned many things since I became Prof Tsung’s student He spends time vary much time instructing me how to write a paper, how to search document, how to find a new idea and how to collect data Special thanks are given to Graduate Institute Digital Mechatronic Technology, Chinese Culture University Most of my theoretical foundations are built in the Graduate Institute Digital Mechatronic Technology I also express my profound sense of reverence to Pro.Jeng-Tze Huang, who is Professor of the Graduate Institute Digital Mechatronic Technology He gave me the most sincere advice to pass the most difficult times In addition, I also wish to express my sincere gratitude to Miss Shiu Wei-Jen, assistant of the Graduate Institute of Digital Mechatronic Technology, Chinese Culture University, for her kindness and enthusiasm of providing me the useful and quick information I owe special thanks to my classmates and laboratory mates for their supports and encouragements Without their help, it is difficult fora foreign student like me can anything as good as expected I will never be able to find words adequate to express my profound gratitude to my family, for their love, supports and sacrifices Their encouragements are motivation for me to finish this thesis Nguyen Hoai Jan, 18th 2015 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES vi CHAPTER INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1.2 Research Objectives 1.3 The structure of this Study 1.4 Significance of the Study CHAPTER LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Historical development ofproximitysensor 2.2 Inductive proximitysensor 2.2.1 Detection principle of inductive proximitysensor 2.2.2 Analog proximitysensor 11 2.2.3 Digital proximitysensor 13 2.3 Applications ofproximitysensor 15 2.3.1 Detecting dynamic motion 15 2.3.2 Touch-pads 15 2.3.3 Aviation safety 15 2.3.4 Ground proximity warning system 15 2.3.5 Air gauging 15 2.3.6 Differential systems 16 2.3.7 Speeding 16 2.3.8 Conveyor system 16 2.4 Standard detectable static of inductive proximitysensor 16 2.4.1 Sensing distance 16 2.4.2 Hysteresis 18 2.5 Dynamic models to measure performanceof the proximitysensor 19 CHAPTER MEASUREMENT METHOD 23 3.1 Diagram and operating principle of static measurement system 23 3.2 Diagram and operating principle of dynamic measurement system 25 CHAPTER RESULT AND DISCUSSION 28 4.1 Static performance measurement ofproximitysensor 28 4.1.1 301 Stainless steel, 0.06 mm thickness 28 4.1.2 99.99% Copper, 0.05 mm thickness 29 iv 4.1.3 99.99% Copper, 0.025 mm thickness 30 4.1.4 Aluminum, 0.1 mm thickness 31 4.1.5 Aluminum, 0.15 mm thickness 31 4.1.6 Alloy, d=0.3 (mm) 32 4.2 Dynamic performance measurement ofproximitysensor 33 4.2.1 Deformation of the aluminum tape with plastic tape and without plastic tape 33 4.2.2 The output signals with analog and digital proximity sensors respectively 34 4.2.3 The relationship between the speeds of conveyor belt (v), sensing distance (h) and the shape of the output signal (peak to peak voltage and duty cycle) 36 4.2.4 The shape output signal when adding a plastic tape underneath the aluminum tape 42 CHAPTER CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 46 5.1 Conclusion 46 5.2 Future work 47 REFERENCE 48 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Scheme ofmobilerobot system Figure Typical inductive proximitysensor configuration Figure Performanceidentificationformobilerobot Figure The first proximitysensor (source: http://www.controlengeurope.com/article/20839/Fifty-years-old the-proximityswitch.aspx) Figure Proximity parameters Figure Proximitysensor configuration 10 Figure Sensor's electromagnetic fields 11 Figure Inductive analog sensor 12 Figure Current and Voltage output ofproximity analog sensor 12 Figure 10 Measurement range ofproximity analog sensor 13 Figure 11 Voltage output of digital proximitysensor 14 Figure 12 Electronic output circuits of digital proximitysensor 14 Figure 13 Sensing distance definition 17 Figure 14 Hysteresis 18 Figure 15 Metal detector in conveyor belt system 19 Figure 16 Metal detector in gear 20 Figure 17 Detecting whether an object exists in a defined position 20 Figure 18 Positioning of an object 21 Figure 19 Counting the number of parts 21 Figure 20 Determining the rotational speed 22 Figure 21 Determining the linear speed 22 Figure 22 A testing setup of measurement system 23 Figure 23 Inductive proximitysensor current versus displacement 24 Figure 24 Diagram of measurement system with digital proximitysensor 25 Figure 25 Diagram of measurement system with analog proximitysensor 26 Figure 26 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of 301 stainless steel 28 Figure 27 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of 99.99% copper, 0.05-0.4 mm thickness 29 Figure 28 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of 99.99% copper, 0.025-0.2 mm thickness 30 Figure 29 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of aluminum, 0.1-0.8 mm thickness 31 Figure 30 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of aluminum, 0.15-1.2 mm thickness 31 Figure 31 Relationship of sensing distance and thickness of alloy, 0.3-2.4 mm thickness 32 Figure 32 Deformation of the aluminum tape with plastic tape 33 vi Figure 33 Deformation of aluminum tape with a normal plastic tape 33 Figure 34 Deformation of aluminum tmation of aluminum tape with a special plastic tape 33 Figure 35 Digital output signals with digital proximitysensor 34 Figure 36 Analog output signals with analog proximitysensor 35 Figure 37 The shape of the output signal corresponding to the speed 1.3 m/s 36 Figure 38 The shape of the output signal corresponding to the speed 3.4 m/s 37 Figure 39 The relationship between v(m/s) and Vpp (mV) 38 Figure 40 The relationship between v (m/s) and D (%) 38 Figure 41 The shape of the output signal corresponding to the sensing distance 1.5 mm 39 Figure 42 The shape of the output signal corresponding to the sensing distance 3.5 mm 40 Figure 43 The relationship between h (mm) and Vpp (mV) 41 Figure 44 The relationship between h (mm) and D (%) 41 Figure 45 The shape of the output signal when adding plastic tape underneath the aluminum tape (v=const) 42 Figure 46 The shape of the output signal when adding plastic tape underneath the aluminum tape (v=const) 43 Figure 47 The shape of the output signal when changing the thickness of aluminum tape (h=const) 44 Figure 48 The shape of the output signal when changing the thickness of aluminum tape (v=const) 45 vii ...i ABSTRACT For a control system, using the static performance of a sensor is always a milestone of dynamic performance of the system The static performance of a proximity sensor plays an important... such as: velocity, sensing distance, dimension of material, thickness of material, and so on Through measurement, the static and dynamic performances of a proximity sensor can be fast evaluated and... important role due to it affects the dynamic properties quality of a mobile robot and the results of dynamic identification A proximity sensor is a common sensor to search a metal guideline for a mobile