Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Composite Structures journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct NonlineardynamicresponseofimperfecteccentricallystiffenedFGMdoublecurvedshallowshellsonelasticfoundation Nguyen Dinh Duc University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam National University, 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Viet Nam a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Available online December 2012 Keywords: NonlineardynamicEccentricallystiffenedFGMdoublecurvedshallowshells Imperfection Elasticfoundation a b s t r a c t This paper presents an analytical investigation on the nonlineardynamicresponseofeccentricallystiffened functionally graded doublecurvedshallowshells resting onelastic foundations and being subjected to axial compressive load and transverse load The formulations are based on the classical shell theory taking into account geometrical nonlinearity, initial geometrical imperfection and the Lekhnitsky smeared stiffeners technique with Pasternak type elasticfoundation The non-linear equations are solved by the Runge-Kutta and Bubnov-Galerkin methods Obtained results show effects of material and geometrical properties, elasticfoundation and imperfection on the dynamical responseof reinforced FGMshallowshells Some numerical results are given and compared with ones of other authors Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved Introduction Functionally Graded Materials (FGMs), which are microscopically composites and made from mixture of metal and ceramic constituents, have received considerable attention in recent years due to their high performance heat resistance capacity and excellent characteristics in comparison with conventional composites By continuously and gradually varying the volume fraction of constituent materials through a specific direction, FGMs are capable of withstanding ultrahigh temperature environments and extremely large thermal gradients Therefore, these novel materials are chosen to use in temperature shielding structure components of aircraft, aerospace vehicles, nuclear plants and engineering structures in various industries As a result, in recent years important studies have been researched about the stability and vibration ofFGM plates and shells The research onFGMshells and plates under dynamic load is attractive to many researchers in the world Firstly we have to mention the research group of Reddy et al The vibration of functionally graded cylindrical shells has been investigated by Lam and Reddy (1999) in [1] Lam and Li has taken into account the influence of boundary conditions on the frequency characteristics of a rotating truncated circular conical shell [2] In [3] Pradhan et al studied vibration characteristics ofFGM cylindrical shells under various boundary conditions Ng et al studied the dynamic stability analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells under periodic axial loading [4] The group of Ng and Lam also published results on generalized differential quadrate for free vibration E-mail address: ducnd@vnu.edu.vn 0263-8223/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.017 of rotating composite laminated conical shell with various boundary conditions in 2003 [5] In the same year, Yang and Shen [6] published the nonlinear analysis ofFGM plates under transverse and in-plane loads In 2004, Zhao et al studied the free vibration of two-side simply-supported laminated cylindrical panel via the mesh-free kpRitz method [7] About vibration ofFGM plates Vel and Batra [8] gave three dimensional exact solution for the vibration ofFGM rectangular plates Also in this year, Sofiyev and Schnack investigated the stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells under linearly increasing dynamic tensional loading in [9] and obtained the result for the stability of functionally graded truncated conical shells subjected to a periodic impulsive loading [10], and they published the result of the stability of functionally graded ceramic– metal cylindrical shells under a periodic axial impulsive loading in 2005 [11] Ferreira et al received natural frequencies ofFGM plates by meshless method [12], 2006 In [13], Zhao et al used the element-free kp-Ritz method for free vibration analysis of conical shell panels Liew et al studied the nonlinear vibration of a coating-FGM-substrate cylindrical panel subjected to a temperature gradient [14] and dynamic stability of rotating cylindrical shells subjected to periodic axial loads [15] Woo et al investigated the nonlinear free vibration behavior of functionally graded plates [16] Kadoli and Ganesan studied the buckling and free vibration analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells subjected to a temperature-specified boundary condition [17] Also in this year, Wu et al published their results ofnonlinear static and dynamic analysis of functionally graded plates [18] Sofiyev has considered the buckling of functionally graded truncated conical shells under dynamic axial loading [19] Prakash et al studied the nonlinear axisymmetric dynamic buckling behavior of clamped functionally 89 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 graded spherical caps [20] In [21], Darabi et al obtained the nonlinear analysis ofdynamic stability for functionally graded cylindrical shells under periodic axial loading Natural frequencies and buckling stresses ofFGM plates were analyzed by Matsunaga using 2-D higher-order deformation theory [22] In 2008, Shariyat also obtained the dynamic thermal buckling of suddenly heated temperature-dependent FGM cylindrical shells under combined axial compression [23] and external pressure and dynamic buckling of suddenly loaded imperfect hybrid FGM cylindrical with temperature–dependent material properties under thermoelectro-mechanical loads [24] Allahverdizadeh et al studied nonlinear free and forced vibration analysis of thin circular functionally graded plates [25] Sofiyev investigated the vibration and stability behavior of freely supported FGM conical shells subjected to external pressure [26], 2009 Shen published a valuable book ‘‘Functionally Graded materials, Nonlinear Analysis of plates and shells’’, in which the results about nonlinear vibration of shear deformable FGM plates are presented [27] Last years, Zhang and Li published the dynamic buckling ofFGM truncated conical shells subjected to non-uniform normal impact load [28], Bich and Long (2010) studied the non-linear dynamical analysis of functionally graded material shallowshells subjected to some dynamic loads [29], Dung and Nam investigated the nonlineardynamic analysis ofimperfectFGMshallowshells with simply supported and clamped boundary conditions [30] Bich et al has also considered the nonlinear vibration of functionally graded shallow spherical shells [31] In fact, the FGM plates and shells, as other composite structures, usually reinforced by stiffening member to provide the benefit of added load-carrying static and dynamic capability with a relatively small additional weight penalty Thus study on static and dynamic problems of reinforced FGM plates and shells with geometrical nonlinearity are of significant practical interest However, up to date, the investigation on static and dynamicofeccentricallystiffenedFGM structures has received comparatively little attention Recently, Bich et al studied nonlinear dynamical analysis ofeccentricallystiffened functionally graded cylindrical panels [32] This paper presents an dynamicnonlinearresponseofdoublecurvedshalloweccentricallystiffenedshellsFGM resting onelastic foundations and being subjected to axial compressive load and transverse load The formulations are based on the classical shell theory taking into account geometrical nonlinearity, initial geometrical imperfection and the Lekhnitsky smeared stiffeners technique with Pasternak type elasticfoundation The nonlinear transients responseof doubly curvedshallowshells subjected to excited external forces obtained the dynamic critical buckling loads are evaluated based on the displacement response using the criterion suggested by Budiansky–Roth Obtained results show effects of material, geometrical properties, eccentrically stiffened, elasticfoundation and imperfection on the dynamical responseofFGMshallowshellsEccentricallystiffeneddoublecurvedFGMshallow shell onelastic foundations Consider a ceramic–metal stiffenedFGMdoublecurvedshallow shell of radii of curvature Rx, Ry length of edges a, b and uniform thickness h resting on an elasticfoundation A coordinate system (x, y, z) is established in which (x, y) plane on the middle surface of the panel and z is thickness direction (Àh/2 z h/2) as shown in Fig The volume fractions of constituents are assumed to vary through the thickness according to the following power law distribution z b a h y x Ry Rx Fig Geometry and coordinate system of an eccentricallystiffeneddoublecurvedshallowFGM shell onelasticfoundation V m zị ẳ N 2z ỵ h ; 2h V c zị ẳ V m zị 1ị where N is volume fraction index (0 N < 1) Effective properties Preff ofFGM panel are determined by linear rule of mixture as Preff zị ẳ Prm V m zị ỵ Prc V c zị 2ị where Pr denotes a material property, and subscripts m and c stand for the metal and ceramic constituents, respectively Specific expressions of modulus of elasticity E(z) and q(z) are obtained by substituting Eq (1) into Eq (2) as ẵEzị; qzị ẳ Em ; qm ị ỵ Ecm ; qcm ị N 2z ỵ h 2h 3ị where Ecm ẳ Ec Em ; qcm ẳ qc qm ; mzị ẳ const ¼ m ð4Þ It is evident from Eqs (3), (4) that the upper surface of the panel (z = Àh/2) is ceramic-rich, while the lower surface (z = h/2) is metal-rich, and the percentage of ceramic constituent in the panel is enhanced when N increases The panel–foundation interaction is represented by Pasternak model as qe ¼ k1 w À k2 r2 w 2 ð5Þ 2 where r = @ /@x + @ / oy , w is the deflection of the panel, k1 is Winkler foundation modulus and k2 is the shear layer foundation stiffness of Pasternak model Theoretical formulation In this study, the classical shell theory and the Lekhnitsky smeared stiffeners technique are used to obtain governing equations and determine the nonlinear dynamical responseofFGMcurved panels The strain across the shell thickness at a distance z from the mid-surface are 0 1 ex ex kx B e C B e0 C B C @ y A ¼ @ y A À z@ ky A cxy 2kxy c0xy ð6Þ where e0x ; e0x and c0xy are normal and shear strain at the middle surface of the shell, and kx, ky, kxy are the curvatures The nonlinear strain–displacement relationship based upon the von Karman theory for moderately large deflection and small strain are: 1 e0x u;x À w=Rx ỵ w2;x =2 B e0 C B C @ y A ẳ @ v ;y w=Ry ỵ w2;y =2 A; c xy u;y ỵ v ;x ỵ w;x w;y 1 wx;x kx B C B C @ ky A ¼ @ wy;y A w;xy kxy ð7Þ In which u, v are the displacement components along the x, y directions, respectively 90 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 The force and moment resultants of the FGM panel are determined by ðNi ; Mi Þ ¼ Z x2 h=2 ri ð1; zÞdz i ¼ x; y; xy ð8Þ Àh=2 The constitutive stress–strain equations by Hooke law for the shell material are omitted here for brevity The shell reinforced by eccentrically longitudinal and transversal stiffeners is shown in Fig The shallow shell is assumed to have a relative small rise as compared with its span The contribution of stiffeners can be accounted for using the Lekhnitsky smeared stiffeners technique Then intergrading the stress–strain equations and their moments through the thickness of the shell, the expressions for force and moment resultants of an eccentricallystiffenedFGMshallow shell are obtained E1 EA1 E1 m E2 E2 m kx À Nx ẳ ỵ e ỵ e ỵ C ky x y À m2 s1 À m2 À m2 À m2 E1 m E1 EA2 E m E2 Ny ¼ e ỵ ỵ ey 2 kx ỵ C ky À m2 x À m2 s2 1Àm À m2 E2 E2 m E3 EI1 E3 m kx À Mx ẳ ỵ C e0x ỵ e ỵ ky À m2 À m2 y À m2 s1 À m2 E2 m E2 EA1 E m E3 EI2 ky My ẳ e ỵ ỵ ey kx þ À m2 x À m2 s1 1Àm À m2 s2 N xy ¼ E1 c0xy 2E2 kxy 21 ỵ mị E2 c0xy À 2E3 kxy M xy ¼ 2ð1 þ mÞ ð9Þ h z z2 x1 O s1 s1 s1 s2 Ecm h E1 ¼ Em þ Nþ1 s2 Fig Configuration of an eccentricallystiffenedshallowshells where q¼ Z h À2h qzịdz ẳ qm ỵ qcm Nỵ1 h 12ị in which q @@t2u ! and q @@t2v ! into consideration because of u ( w, v ( w the Eq (11) can be rewritten as: Mx;xx þ 2Mxy;xy þ My;yy þ Nx Ny þ þ Nx w;xx ỵ 2Nxy w;xy ỵ Ny w;yy Rx Ry @2w @t ð13Þ Calculating from Eq (9), obtained: Ecm Nh E2 ẳ 2N ỵ 1ịN ỵ 2ị ! Em 1 E3 ẳ ỵ h þ Ecm N þ N þ 4N þ 12 EA1 z1 EA2 z2 C1 ¼ ; C2 ¼ s1 s2 ð10Þ ð14Þ EA1 E1 EA2 E1 ; A ỵ ẳ ỵ 22 D s1 À m2 D s2 À m2 E1 m 21 ỵ mị A12 ẳ ; A66 ¼ E1 D À m2 2 EA1 E1 EA2 E1 E1 m À D¼ þ þ s1 À m2 s2 À m2 À m2 E2 E2 m À A12 B11 ẳ A22 C ỵ ; m2 À m2 E2 E2 m À A12 B22 ẳ A11 C ỵ m2 À m2 E2 m E2 ; B12 ¼ A22 A ỵ C 12 m2 À m2 E2 m E2 À A12 þ C1 B21 ¼ A11 À m2 À m2 E2 B66 ¼ E1 A11 ¼ @2u @t @2v ẳq @t N x;x ỵ N xy;y ẳ q ð15Þ Substituting once again Eq (14) into the expression of Mij in (9) leads to: Nx Ny ỵ ỵ N x w;xx ỵ 2Nxy w;xy ỵ Ny w;yy Rx Ry ỵ q k1 w ỵ k2 r2 w ẳ q e0x ẳ A22 Nx A12 Ny ỵ B11 kx ỵ B12 ky e0y ẳ A11 Ny A12 Nx ỵ B21 kx ỵ B22 ky c0xy ẳ A66 Nxy ỵ 2A66 kxy where are made of full metal (E = Em) if putting them at the metal-rich side of the shell, and conversely full ceramic stiffeners (E = Ec) at the ceramic-rich side of the shell In above relations (9) and (10), the quantities A1, A2 are the cross section areas of the stiffeners and I1, I2, z1, z2 are the second moments of cross section areas and eccentricities of the stiffeners with respect to the middle surface of the shell respectively, E is elasticity modulus in the axial direction of the corresponding stiffener witch is assumed identical for both types of stiffeners (Fig 2) In order to provide continuity between the shell and stiffeners, suppose that stiffeners The nonlineardynamic equations of a FGMshallowshells based on the classical shell theory are [33] M x;xx þ 2M xy;xy þ My;yy þ s2 b þ q k1 w ỵ k2 r2 w ẳ q where: s2 z1 N xy;x ỵ Ny;y s1 a M x ẳ B11 Nx ỵ B21 Ny D11 kx À D12 ky @2w @t M x ¼ B12 Nx ỵ B22 Ny D21 kx D22 ky 11ị M xy ẳ B66 Nxy 2D66 kxy 16ị 91 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 The approximate solutions of w, w⁄ and f satisfying boundary conditions (23) are assumed to be [27–31] where: D11 D22 D12 D21 EI1 E3 E2 E2 m B11 À ẳ ỵ C ỵ B21 s1 m À m2 À m2 EI2 E3 E2 E2 m B22 ẳ ỵ C ỵ B12 s2 m À m2 À m2 E3 m E2 E2 m B12 ẳ C ỵ B22 1 À m2 À m2 À m2 E3 m E2 E2 m B21 À ¼ À C ỵ B11 m2 m2 m2 D66 ẳ 17ị 24aị w ẳ W sin km x sin dn y 24bị f ẳ gtịẵsin km x sin dn y hxị xyị ð24cÞ where km = mp/a, dn = np/b and W is the maximum deflection; W0 is a constant; h(x) and x(y) chosen such that: gh00 xị ẳ p0 h gx00 yị ẳ r0 h E3 E2 B66 21 ỵ mị 21 ỵ mị Then Mij into the Eq (13) and f(x, y) is stress function defined by Nx ¼ f;yy ; Ny ¼ f;xx ; Nxy ¼ Àf;xy w ¼ WðtÞ sin km x sin dn y ð18Þ Subsequently, substitution of Eq (24a,b) into Eq (22), (24c) into Eq (19) and applying the Galerkin procedure for the resulting equation yield leads to: g A11 m4 ỵ A66 2A12 ịm2 n2 k2 ỵ A22 n4 k4 For an imperfectFGMcurved panel, Eq (13) are modified into form B21 f;xxxx ỵ B12 f;yyyy ỵ B11 ỵ B22 2B66 ịf;xxyy D11 w;xxxx D22 w;yyyy ỵ D12 ỵ D21 ỵ 4D66 ịw;xxyy ỵ f;yy w;xx 2f ;xy w;xy ỵ f;xx w;yy f;yy f;xx @2w ỵ þ q À k1 w þ k2 r2 w ¼ q Rx Ry @t e0x;yy ỵ e0y;xx À c0xy;xy ¼ w2;xy À w;xx w;yy À wÃ2 ;xy þ w;xx w;yy w;yy À wÃ;yy w;xx À wÃ;xx À : Rx Ry ð20Þ From the constitutive relations (18) in conjunction with Eq (14) one can write e0x ¼ A22 f;yy A12 f;xx ỵ B11 w;xx ỵ B12 w;yy e0y ẳ A11 f;xx A12 f;yy ỵ B21 w;xx þ B22 w;yy c0xy ¼ ÀA66 f;xy þ 2A66 w;xy þ ð19Þ in which w⁄(x, y) is a known function representing initial small imperfection of the eccentricallystiffenedshallowshells The geometrical compatibility equation for an imperfectshallowshells is written À a2 p2 ð21Þ Setting Eq (21) into Eq (20) gives the compatibility equation of an imperfecteccentricallystiffenedshallowFGMshells as ! n2 k2 m2 ðW À W ị ỵ Rx Ry g 16 mnk2 W W 20 ị ẳ p2 p4 h a4 26ị B21 m4 ỵ B11 ỵ B22 B66 ịn2 m2 k2 ỵ B12 n4 k4 i i D11 m4 ỵ D12 ỵ D21 ỵ 4D66 ịn2 m2 k2 ỵ D22 n4 k4 ! 32 p2 hW p2 m2 n2 k2 2k ðm r ỵ n p0 k ị g ỵ þ W gmnp þ a2 a a Ry Rx 16h r p0 16q p @2 W ỵ k1 W k2 W m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ẳ q ỵ a mnp2 Rx Ry mnp2 @t À ðW À W Þ p4 h a4 ð27Þ where m, n are odd numbers, and k ¼ ab Eliminating g from two obtained equations leads to non-linear second-order ordinary differential equation for f(t): " W p2 h a2 m2 r ỵ n2 p0 k2 ị k1 k2 ỵ W W ị4 A11 f;xxxx ỵ A66 2A12 ịf;xxyy ỵ A22 f;yyyy ỵ B21 w;xxxx ỵ B11 þ B22 À 2B66 Þw;xxyy þ B12 w;yyyy w;yy À wÃ;yy w;xx À wÃ;xx ¼ w2;xy À w;xx w;yy À w;xy2 ỵ w;xx w;yy Rx Ry ỵ W B21 m4 ỵ B11 ỵ B22 2B66 ịm2 n2 k2 ỵ B12 n4 k4 D12 þ D21 þ 4D66 Þw;xxyy þ D11 wÃ;xxxx þ D22 w;yyyy ỵ 25ị ! # p4 P2 p2 m2 n2 k2 P2 2 m ỵ k n ị ỵ ỵ a2 a4 P1 a2 Ry Rx P p2 ! p2 m2 n2 k2 P2 p4 a2 Ry ỵ Rx P1 a P m2 n2 k2 ỵ Ry Rx !2 15 P1 " ỵ W W 20 ị 22ị Eqs (19) and (22) are nonlinear equations in terms of variables w and f and used to investigate the nonlineardynamic and nonlinear stability of thick imperfectstiffenedFGMdoublecurved panels onelastic foundations subjected to mechanical, thermal and thermo mechanical loads À W2 ! # m2 n2 k2 16mnk2 16mnp2 k2 P2 ỵ a2 Ry Rx 3P a4 P1 ! 32mnp2 k2 P2 32mnk2 m2 n2 k2 ỵ WW W ị ỵ 3a4 P1 3a2 Ry Rx P À WðW À W 20 Þ 512m2 n2 k 16h r0 p0 16q @2W ỵ ẳq ỵ 9a P1 mnp Rx Ry mnp2 @t ð28Þ where: Nonlineardynamic analysis P1 ẳ A11 m4 ỵ A66 2A12 ịm2 n2 k2 ỵ A22 n4 k4 In the present study, suppose that the stiffenedFGMshallow shell is simply supported at its all edges and subjected to a transverse load q(t), compressive edge loads r0(t) and p0(t) The boundary conditions are w ¼ N xy ¼ M x ¼ 0; Nx ¼ Àr h at x ¼ 0; a w ¼ N xy ¼ M y ¼ 0; Ny ¼ p0 h at y ¼ 0; b: ð23Þ where a and b are the lengths of in-plane edges of the shallow shell P2 ¼ B21 m4 þ ðB11 þ B22 À 2B66 Þm2 n2 k2 þ B12 n4 k4 29ị P3 ẳ D11 m4 ỵ D12 þ D21 þ 4D66 Þm2 n2 k2 þ D22 n4 k4 The obtained Eq (28) is a governing equation for dynamicimperfectstiffenedFGM doubly-curved shallowshells in general The initial _ conditions are assumed as W0ị ẳ W ; W0ị ẳ The nonlinear Eq (28) can be solved by the Newmark’s numerical integration method or Runge–Kutta method 92 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 4.1 Nonlinear vibration ofeccentricallystiffenedFGMshallow shell Consider an imperfectstiffenedFGMshallow shell acted on by uniformly distributed excited transverse q(t) = Qsin Xt, i.e p0 = r0 = 0, from (28) we have Q W ỵ Q W W ị ỵ Q W À W 20 À Q W ỵ Q WW W ị @2W À Q W W À W 20 ỵ Q sin Xt ẳ q @t 30ị where Q ẳ k1 ỵ k2 p a2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ỵ p P2 a4 P1 À p a2 2 m n k ỵ Ry Rx ! responses obtained from the motion Eq (28) This criterion suggested by Budiansky and Roth is employed here as it is widely accepted This criterion is based on that, for large values of loading speed the amplitude–time curve of obtained displacement response increases sharply depending on time and this curve obtained a maximum by passing from the slope point, and at the time t = tcr a stability loss occurs, and here t = tcr is called critical time and the load corresponding to this critical time is called dynamic critical buckling load 4.2.1 ImperfecteccentricallystiffenedFGM cylindrical panel acted on by axial compressive load The Eq (28) in this case Rx ? 1, Ry = R, p0 = q = 0; r0 – can be rewritten as: P2 P1 ! !2 n2 k2 P p4 m2 n2 k2 Q2 ẳ ỵ ỵ P3 ỵ ỵ P1 a Ry Rx P a4 Ry Rx ! m2 n2 k2 16mnk2 16mnp2 k2 P Q3 ¼ þ À a Ry Rx 3P1 a4 P1 p2 m2 Q4 ¼ 32mnp2 k2 P2 3a4 P1 p2 h p4 P2 p2 m2 P2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ỵ a2 a2 a P1 a RP ! p2 m2 P2 p4 m4 À P3 À ỵ W W ị a RP a R P1 " # 16m3 nk2 16mnp2 k2 P 2 ỵ W À W0 a2 3P1 R a4 P1 W ð31Þ 512m2 n2 k 9a4 P1 q W p2 h a2 p4 P2 p2 m2 P2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị þ À a P1 a RP ! 2 4 p m P2 p m ỵ P3 ỵ a RP a R P1 " 16mnp2 k2 P2 32mnp2 k2 P2 16m nk À À ÀW a 3P1 R a4 P1 3a4 P1 # 32mnk m2 512m2 n2 k ỵ W3 37ị ỵ 9a4 P1 3a2 R P1 m2 r ẳW k1 ỵ k2 ð32Þ The equation ofnonlinear free vibration of a perfect FGMshallow panel can be obtained from: ỵ H1 W ỵ H2 W ỵ H W ¼ W H2 ¼ H3 ¼ q q p2 h 34ị a2 m2 r0 ẳ k1 ỵ k2 q Seeking solution as W (t) = scosxt and applying procedure like Galerkin method to Eq (33), the frequency–amplitude relation ofnonlinear free vibration is obtained xNL ð35Þ where xNL is the nonlinear vibration frequency and s is the amplitude ofnonlinear vibration 4.2 Nonlineardynamic buckling analysis ofimperfecteccentricallystiffenedFGMshallow shell The aim of considered problems is to search the critical dynamic buckling loads They can be evaluated based on the displacement p p2 a2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ỵ p4 P2 a4 P À p2 m2 P2 a2 RP À p2 m P a2 RP m P3 ỵ R P1 " 16m3 nk2 16mnp2 k2 P2 32mnp2 k2 P2 ÀW À À a 3P1 R a4 P1 3a4 P1 # 2 2 32mnk m 512m n k ỵ W2 þ 9a4 P1 3a2 R P1 þ Q6 1 8H2 3H3 2 ẳ xL ỵ s ỵ s 3px2L 4x2L a2 Taking of W – 0, i.e considering the shell after the loss of stability we obtain Q ỵ Q ị Q4 Q3 Q5 p2 33ị where denoting H1 ẳ x2L ẳ 36ị The static critical load can be determined by the equation to be € ¼ 0; W ¼ reduced from Eq (36) by putting W From Eq (30) the fundamental frequencies of natural vibration of the imperfectstiffenedFGM shell can be determined by the relation: sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðQ ỵ Q ị ! W2 16Q Q7 ¼ mnp2 xL ¼ p2 32mnp2 k2 P2 32mnk2 m2 ỵ WW W ị 3a P1 3a2 R P1 512m2 n2 k @ W 2 À W W À W0 ¼q 9a4 P1 @t ! 32mnk2 m2 n2 k2 Q5 ẳ ỵ 3a2 Ry Rx P Q6 ¼ m2 r0 À k1 À k2 a4 ð38Þ From Eq (38) the upper buckling load can be determined by W = p4 P2 p2 m2 P2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ỵ p a P1 a RP ! p2 m2 P2 p4 m4 ỵ P3 ỵ a RP a R P1 rupper ẳ a2 m2 h k1 ỵ k2 p2 a2 And the lower buckling load is found using the condition follows 39ị dr0 dW ẳ 0, it 93 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 rlower ¼ a2 p 2 2 9a P k1 ỵ k2 pa2 m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị ỵ pa4 PP2 pa2mRPP2 pa2mRPP2 ỵ pa4 P ỵ Rm2 P 1024m n2 k 2 hm2 1 4 h 1 16m3 nk2 a2 3P1 R k2 À 16mna4p P2 P1 k2 p À 32mn 3a4 P2 P1 m2 R P1 ỵ 32mnk 3a2 i2 ỵ4 512m2 n2 k P1 9a4 2 h 16m3 nk2 a2 3P R k2 À 16mna4p P2 P1 k2 p À 32mn 3a4 P2 P1 ỵ 32mnk 3a2 m2 R P1 i! 40ị 4.2.2 ImperfecteccentricallystiffenedshallowFGM cylindrical panel subjected to transverse load The Eq (28) in this case Rx ? 1, Ry = R, p0 = r0 = can be rewritten as: " W Àk1 À k2 p a2 p2 m2 P2 ỵ W W ị ỵ W m2 ỵ k2 n2 ị W 20 a4 P1 ỵ p4 m4 P3 À a4 RP a2 RP " 16m3 nk2 a2 p P2 2 3RP p n k P2 Em ¼ 70 Â 10 N=m2 ; ! # ð41Þ W Àk1 À k2 a2 m ỵ k n ị p4 P a4 P1 R # ωNL (rad/s) 5.7415 5.7414 0.05 P1 Numerical results and discussions The eccentricallystiffenedFGMshells considered here are shallow shell with in-plane edges: Table The dependence of the fundamental frequencies of nature vibration of spherical FGMdoublecurvedshallow shell on volume ratio N xL (rad/s) Reinforced Unreinforced 56.130 Â 10 39.034 Â 105 31.982 Â 105 24.047 Â 105 55.667 Â 10 38.515 Â 105 31.441 Â 105 23.477 Â 105 0.1 τ 0.15 Fig Frequency–amplitude relation Table The dependence of the fundamental frequencies of nature vibration of spherical FGMdoublecurvedshallow shell onelastic foundations xL (rad/s) K1, K2 K1 = 200, K2 = K1 = 200, K2 = 10 K1 = 200, K2 = 20 K1 = 200, K2 = 30 K1 = 0, K2 = 10 K1 = 100, K2 = 10 K1 = 150, K2 = 10 K1 = 200, K2 = 10 Reinforced Unreinforced 33.574 Â 105 39.034 Â 105 44.079 Â 105 48.535 Â 105 26.734 Â 105 31.534 Â 105 35.585 Â 105 39.034 Â 105 32.865 Â 105 38.515 Â 105 43.273 Â 105 46.371 Â 105 25.646 Â 105 30.078 Â 105 35.033 Â 105 38.515 Â 105 Table Comparison of - with result reported by Bich et al [32], Alijani et al [34], Chorfi and Houmat [35] and Matsunaga [36] (a/Rx, b/Ry) N Present Ref [32] Ref [34] Ref [35] Ref [36] 0.5 10 0.0562 0.0502 0.0449 0.0385 0.0304 0.0597 0.0506 0.0456 0.0396 0.0381 0.0597 0.0506 0.0456 0.0396 0.0380 0.0577 0.0490 0.0442 0.0383 0.0366 0.0588 0.0492 0.0403 0.0381 0.0364 FGM cylindrical panel (0, 0.5) 0.0624 0.5 0.0528 0.0494 0.0407 10 0.0379 0.0648 0.0553 0.0501 0.0430 0.0409 0.0648 0.0553 0.0501 0.0430 0.0408 0.0629 0.0540 0.0490 0.0419 0.0395 0.0622 0.0535 0.0485 0.0413 0.0390 FGM plate (0, 0) ! The static critical load can be determined by the equation to be € ¼ 0; W ¼ and using condireduced from Eq (42) by putting W dq tion dW ¼ N Unreinforced, Rx=Ry =3(m), N=5 5.7416 5.7413 !2 p2 m2 ỵ n k P2 p4 m2 ỵ n2 k2 15 P3 þ ðW À W Þ P1 a R P1 a4 R ! " # m2 þ n2 k2 16mnk2 16mnp2 k2 P 2 ỵ W W0 a2 R 3P1 a4 P1 ! 2 32mnk m2 ỵ n2 k2 32mnp k P ỵ WW W Þ ÀW P1 3a4 P1 3a2 R 512m2 n2 k 16q @ W À W W W 20 ỵ ẳq 9a4 P mnp2 @t ð42Þ 2 Reinforced, R x=R(y)=3(m), N=0 Unreinforced, Rx=Ry =3(m), N=0 p2 m2 ỵ n2 k2 P2 a2 Reinforced, Rx=R y=3(m), N=5 5.7417 ! ỵ x 10 5.7419 5.7418 4.2.3 ImperfecteccentricallystiffenedFGMshallow spherical panel under transverse load The Eq (28) in this case Rx = Ry = R, p0 = r0 = can be rewritten as: 2 m ¼ 0:3 z1 ¼ z2 ¼ 0:0225ðmÞ; The Table presents the dependence of the fundamental frequencies of nature vibration of spherical FGMshallow shell on volume ratio N in which m ¼ n ¼ 1; a ẳ b ẳ 2mị; h ẳ 0:01mị; K ¼ 200; K ¼ 10; Rx ¼ Ry ¼ 3ðmÞ; W ¼ 1e À The static critical load can be determined by the equation to be € ¼ 0; W ¼ and using condireduced from Eq (41) by putting W dq tion dW ¼ 43ị qm ẳ 2702 kg=m ; qc ẳ 3800 kg=m3 ; 32mnp2 k2 P 32m3 nk2 þ WðW À W Þ ÀW 3a P1 3Ra2 P1 512m2 n2 k 16q @2W W W W 20 ỵ ẳq 9a P mnp @t p2 Ec ¼ 380 Â 109 N=m2 ; " h ¼ 0:01m; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0:4; # a2 RP 16mnp2 k2 P2 À a4 P1 a ¼ b ¼ 2m; 94 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 Fig Deflection–velocity relation of the eccentricallystiffenedshallow spherical FGM shell Fig Effect ofeccentrically stiffeners onnonlineardynamicresponseof the shallow spherical FGM shell From the results of Table 1, it can be seen that the increase of volume ration N will lead to the decrease of frequencies of nature vibration of spherical FGMshallow shell Table presents the frequencies of nature vibration of spherical doublecurvedFGMshallow shell depending onelastic foundations These results show that the increase of the coefficients ofelastic foundations will lead to the increase of the frequencies of nature vibration Moreover, the Pasternak type elasticfoundation has the greater influence on the frequencies of nature vibration ofFGM shell than Winkler model does Based on (28) the nonlinear vibration ofimperfecteccentricallystiffenedshells under various loading cases can be performed Particularly for spherical panel we put R1x ¼ R1y in (28), for cylindrical shell R1x ¼ and for a plate R1x ¼ R1y ¼ Table presents q the ffiffiffiffi comparison on the fundamental frequency parameter - ¼ xL h qEcc (In the Table 1–3, xL is calculated from Eq (32)) given by the present analysis with the result of Alijani et al [34] based on the Donnell’s nonlinearshallow shell theory, Chorfi and Haumat [35] based on the first-order shear deformation theory and Matsunaga [36] based on the two-dimensional (2D) higher order theory for the perfect unreinforced FGM cylindrical panel The results in Table were obtained with m = n = 1, a = b = 2(m), h = 0.02(m), K1 = 0, K2 = 0; W⁄ = and with the chosen material properties in (43) As in Table 3, we can observe a very good agreement in this comparison study Fig shows the relation frequency–amplitude ofnonlinear free vibration of reinforced and unreinforced spherical shallowFGM shell onelasticfoundation (calculated from Eq (35)) with m ¼ n ¼ 1; a ẳ b ẳ 2mị; h ẳ 0:01mị; K ¼ 200; K ¼ 10; Rx ¼ Ry ¼ 3ðmÞ; W ¼ 1e À As expected the nonlinear vibration frequencies of reinforced spherical shallowFGMshells are greater than ones of unreinforced shells The nonlinear Eq (28) is solved by Runge–Kutta method The below figures, except Fig 6, are calculated basing on k1 = 100; k2 = 10 Fig Influence ofelastic foundations onnonlineardynamicresponseof the eccentricallystiffenedshallow spherical FGM shell Fig shows the effect ofeccentrically stiffeners onnonlinear respond of the FGMshallow shell onelasticfoundation The FGM shell considered here is spherical panel Rx = Ry = m Clearly, the stiffeners played positive role in reducing amplitude of maximum deflection Relation of maximum deflection and velocity for spherical shallow shell is expressed in Fig Fig shows influence ofelastic foundations onnonlineardynamicresponseof spherical panel Obviously, elastic foundations N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 95 Fig Effect of Rx onnonlineardynamicresponse Fig Effect of volume metal-ceramic onnonlinearresponseof the eccentricallystiffenedshallow spherical FGM shell Fig Effect ofdynamic loads onnonlinearresponse played negative role ondynamicresponseof the shell: the larger k1 and k2 coefficients are, the larger amplitude of deflections is Fig shows effect of volume metal-ceramic onnonlineardynamicresponseof the eccentricallystiffenedshallow spherical FGM shell Figs and show effect ofdynamic loads and Rx onnonlineardynamicresponseof the eccentricallystiffenedshallow spherical FGM shell Fig 10 Influence of initial imperfection onnonlineardynamicresponseof the eccentricallystiffened spherical panel Fig 10 shows influence of initial imperfection onnonlineardynamicresponseof the eccentricallystiffened spherical panel The increase in imperfection will lead to the increase of the amplitude of maximum deflection Fig 11 shows nonlineardynamicresponseofshalloweccentricallystiffened spherical and eccentricallystiffened cylindrical FGM 96 N.D Duc / Composite Structures 99 (2013) 88–96 Fig 11 Nonlineardynamicresponseofeccentricallystiffened spherical and cylindrical FGM panel panels For eccentricallystiffened cylindrical FGM panel, in this case, the obtained results is identical to the result of Bich in [32] Concluding remarks This paper presents an analytical investigation on the nonlineardynamicresponseofeccentricallystiffened functionally graded doublecurvedshallowshells resting onelastic foundations and being subjected to axial compressive load and transverse load The formulations are based on the classical shell theory taking into account geometrical nonlinearity, initial geometrical imperfection and the Lekhnitsky smeared stiffeners technique with Pasternak type elasticfoundation The nonlinear equations are solved by the Runge–Kutta and Bubnov-Galerkin methods Some results were compared with the ones of the other authors Obtained results show effects of material, geometrical properties, eccentrically stiffened, elasticfoundation and imperfection on the dynamical responseof reinforced FGMdoublecurvedshallowshells Hence, when we change these parameters, we can control the dynamicresponse and vibration of the FGMshallowshells actively Acknowledgments This work was supported by Project in Mechanics of the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development of Vietnam-NAFOSTED The author is grateful for this financial support References [1] Loy CT, Lam KY, Reddy JN Vibration of functionally graded cylindrical shells Int Mech Sci 1999;41:309–24 [2] Lam KY, Li Hua Influence of boundary conditions on the frequency characteristics of a rotating truncated circular conical shell J Sound Vib 1999;223(2):171–95 [3] Pradhan SC, Loy CT, Lam KY, Reddy JN Vibration characteristics ofFGM cylindrical shells under various boundary conditions J Appl Acoust 2000;61:111–29 [4] Ng TY, Lam KY, Liew KM, Reddy JN Dynamic stability analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells under periodic axial loading Int J Solids Struct 2001;38:1295–309 [5] Ng TY, Hua Li, Lam KY Generalized differential quadrate for free vibration of rotating composite laminated conical shell with various boundary conditions Int J Mech Sci 2003;45:467–587 [6] Yang J, Shen HS Non-linear analysis ofFGM plates under transverse and inplane loads Int J Non-Linear Mech 2003;38:467–82 [7] Zhao X, Ng TY, Liew KM Free vibration of two-side simply-supported laminated cylindrical panel via the mesh-free kp-Ritz method Int J Mech Sci 2004;46:123–42 [8] Vel SS, Batra RC Three dimensional exact solution for the vibration ofFGM rectangular plates J Sound Vib 2004;272(3):703–30 [9] Sofiyev AH, Schnack E The stability of functionally graded cylindrical shells under linearly increasing dynamic tensional loading Eng Struct 2004;26:1321–31 [10] Sofiyev AH The stability of functionally graded truncated conical shells subjected to a periodic impulsive loading Int Solids Struct 2004;41:3411–24 [11] Sofiyev AH The stability of compositionally graded ceramic–metal cylindrical shells under a periodic axial impulsive loading Compos Struct 2005;69:247–57 [12] Ferreira AJM, Batra RC, Roque CMC Natural frequencies ofFGM plates by meshless method J Compos Struct 2006;75:593–600 [13] Zhao X, Li Q, Liew KM, Ng TY The element-free kp-Ritz method for free vibration analysis of conical shell panels J Sound Vib 2006;295:906–22 [14] Liew KM, Yang J, Wu YF Nonlinear vibration of a coating-FGM-substrate cylindrical panel subjected to a temperature gradient Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2006;195:1007–26 [15] Liew KM, Hu GY, Ng TY, Zhao X Dynamic stability of rotating cylindrical shells subjected to periodic axial loads Int J Solids Struct 2006;43:7553–70 [16] Woo J, Meguid SA, Ong LS Nonlinear free vibration behavior of functionally graded plates J Sound Vib 2006;289:595–611 [17] Kadoli Ravikiran, Ganesan N Buckling and free vibration analysis of functionally graded cylindrical shells subjected to a temperature-specified boundary condition J Sound Vib 2006;289:450–80 [18] Wu Tsung-Lin, Shukla KK, Huang Jin H Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of functionally graded plates Int J Appl Mech Eng 2006;11:679–98 [19] Sofiyev AH The buckling of functionally graded truncated conical shells under dynamic axial loading J Sound Vib 2007;305(4–5):808–26 [20] Prakash T, Sundararajan N, Ganapathi M On the nonlinear axisymmetric dynamic buckling behavior of clamped functionally graded spherical caps J Sound Vib 2007;299:36–43 [21] Darabi M, Darvizeh M, Darvizeh A Non-linear analysis ofdynamic stability for functionally graded cylindrical shells under periodic axial loading Compos Struct 2008;83:201–11 [22] Matsunaga Hiroyuki Free vibration and stability ofFGM plates according to a 2-D high order deformation theory J Compos Struct 2008;82:499–512 [23] Shariyat M Dynamic thermal buckling of suddenly heated temperaturedependent FGM cylindrical shells under combined axial compression and external pressure Int J Solids Struct 2008;45:2598–612 [24] Shariyat M Dynamic buckling of suddenly loaded imperfect hybrid FGM cylindrical with temperature–dependent material properties under thermoelectro-mechanical loads Int J Mech Sci 2008;50:1561–71 [25] Allahverdizadeh A, Naei MH, Nikkhah Bahrami M Nonlinear free and forced vibration analysis of thin circular functionally graded plates J Sound Vib 2008;310:966–84 [26] Sofiyev AH The vibration and stability behavior of freely supported FGM conical shells subjected to external pressure Compos Struct 2009;89:356–66 [27] Hui-Shen Shen Functionally graded materials, nonlinear analysis of plates and shells London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2009 [28] Zhang J, Li S Dynamic buckling ofFGM truncated conical shells subjected to non-uniform normal impact load Compos Struct 2010;92:2979–83 [29] Bich DH, Long VD Non-linear dynamical analysis ofimperfect functionally graded material shallowshells Vietnam J Mech VAST 2010;32(1):1–14 [30] Dung DV, Nam VH Nonlineardynamic analysis ofimperfectFGMshallowshells with simply supported and clamped boundary conditions In: Proceedings of the tenth national conference on deformable solid mechanics, Thai Nguyen-Vietnam; 2010 p 130–41 [31] Bich DH, Hoa LK Nonlinear vibration of functionally graded shallow spherical shells Vietnam J Mech 2010;32(4):199–210 [32] Bich DV, Dung DV, Nam VH Nonlinear dynamical analysis ofeccentricallystiffened functionally graded cylindrical panels Compos Struct 2012;94: 2465–73 [33] Brush DD, Almroth BO Buckling of bars, plates and shells McGraw-Hill; 1975 [34] Alijani F, Amabili M, Karagiozis K, Bakhtiari-Nejad F Nonlinear vibrations of functionally graded doubly curvedshallowshells J Sound Vib 2011;330:1432–54 [35] Chorfi SM, Houmat A Nonlinear free vibration of a functionally graded doubly curvedshallow shell of elliptical plan-form Composite Struct 2010;92: 2573–81 [36] Matsunaga H Free vibration and stability of functionally graded shallowshells according to a 2-D higher-order deformation theory Compos Struct 2008;84: 132–46 ... effects of material, geometrical properties, eccentrically stiffened, elastic foundation and imperfection on the dynamical response of FGM shallow shells Eccentrically stiffened double curved FGM shallow. .. and Rx on nonlinear dynamic response of the eccentrically stiffened shallow spherical FGM shell Fig 10 Influence of initial imperfection on nonlinear dynamic response of the eccentrically stiffened. .. nonlinear equations in terms of variables w and f and used to investigate the nonlinear dynamic and nonlinear stability of thick imperfect stiffened FGM double curved panels on elastic foundations