Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 39 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
39
Dung lượng
327,65 KB
Nội dung
VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND LAW FACULTY OF LAW ====●OΟ●==== LEGAL ETHICS Topic 5: DUTIESOFLAWYERTOTHECOURTANDOTHERPUBLICAGENCIES;RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERLAWYERS Ho Chi Minh City, October 22, 2017 CATEGORY PREFACE Chapter DUTIESOFLAWYERTOTHECOURTANDOTHERPUBLICAGENCIES;RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERLAWYERS IN VIETNAM I PRINCIPLES OFLAWYER RELATION BETWEEN JUDICIARY BODIES ANDOTHER STATE AGENCIES 1.1 St udy purpose, significance 1.2 C odes adjustment 1.3 The cause forming therelationship between lawyerandthe judiciary bodies andother state agencies 1.4 N ature ofrelationship 1.4.1 Therelationship between lawyerand judiciary bodies 1.4.2 Therelationshipofthelawyerandother state bodies: 1.5 The behavior ofthelawyer in relationshipwith proceeding authorities 1.6 Laywers are forbidden form the following in relationshipwith judiciary bodies 11 1.7 Th e behavior ofthelawyer in relationshipwithother state bodies 12 1.8 Pra ctice 13 II THE RULES OFRELATIONSHIPWITH COLLEAGUES 14 2.1 Study purpose 14 2.2 Study significance 15 2.3 The behavior ofthelawyer in relationshipwith colleagues 15 2.3.1 Rule 15: Protect dignity and credibility ofthelawyers 15 2.3.2 Rule 16: Respect and cooperate with colleagues 16 2.3.3 Rule 17: Colleagueship among lawyers 18 2.3.4 Rule 18 Profession Competition 19 2.3.5 Rule 19: Code of conduct in case of right and interest conflicts with colleagues 20 2.3.6 Rule 20: Behaviours forbidden in relationshipwith colleagues .21 2.3.7 Rule 21: In relationshipwithlawyer social – professional organizations – and legal practicing organizations 22 2.3.8 Rule 22 In relation withthelawyer apprentice 23 2.4 Practice 24 Chapter DUTIESOFLAWYERTOTHECOURTANDOTHERPUBLICAGENCIES;RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERLAWYERS IN FRANCE 26 INTRODUCTION 26 I THEDUTIESOFTHELAWYER 27 1.1 The principe of independence 28 1.2 The principe of loyalty 29 1.3 The principe of confidentiality 30 1.4 The respect ofthe professional secret 30 1.5 The duty of information, advice and diligence 32 II THERELATIONSHIPOFTHELAWYER 33 2.1 Therelationshipofthelawyerwith his client 33 2.2 Therelationshipofthelawyerwith his colleagues 34 2.3 Therelationshipofthelawyerwiththeother agencies 35 CONCLUSION 36 REFERENCE MATERIALS 37 PREFACE The form of principles of ethics andlawyer professional behaviors relax to judiciary bodies, other state agencies as well as colleagues have particular importance in evaluating positions, the roles andthe effectiveness oflawyer professional activity Deeply experienced, flexibility and clever application ofthe rules will help to raise the lawyer’s sense of self-awareness to execute obligation ethics and professional behaviors and communication; to limit errors, misconceptions and violations, to improve the efficiency of work, to contribute tothe social function of lawyer, to establish strong position and effective voice in the cause of state’s jurisdiction, respect and protection of human rights in the judiciary, gain respect from judiciary bodies, other state agencies and colleagues CHAPTER 1: DUTIESOFLAWYERTOTHECOURTANDOTHERPUBLICAGENCIES;RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERLAWYERS IN VIETNAM I PRINCIPLES OFLAWYER RELATION BETWEEN JUDICIARY BODIES ANDOTHER STATE AGENCIES 1.1 Study purpose, significance Due tothe require of professional activity, therelationship between lawyerand judiciary bodies has established a regular and close To specific the principles in this relationship requirement in legal awareness Understanding the principles, lawyer will pay attention, build, establish relationships lawyerand judiciary bodies, promote better, healthier relationships, proactive positive and above all is to bring benefits of legal work 1.2 Codes adjustment Lawyer’s activity is a judicial supplementary activity, which is inevitably relate to how the judiciary bodies at all phases ofthe proceedings Lawyer’s activity is not only stipulated in Lawyer law, the Decrees stipulating details andthe Circular guiding to make ofLawyer law which are almost related to all legal documents, litigation areas Lawyer not only appears to institute the defense counsel through criminal cases but also the preserver of legal rights for the litigant or the representative for the litigant in civil, administrative, economic, labor,… Lawyer not only participates in legal action but also participates in arbitration lawsuit disputes In addition, the provisions in Rules 23, 24, 25 ofthe Vietnam Ethical Rules and Code of Conducts for Lawyers, issued in accordance with Decision 68/QD-HDLSTQ 20th July 2011 of national lawyer council In essence, lawyer’s activity is presented in all legal relationships, involved in legal protection for organizations and citizens in various legal capacity 1.3 The cause forming therelationship between lawyerandthe judiciary bodies andother state agencies - Cause 1: In reality, the legitimate rights and benefits of citizens is at risk of being harm Therefore, to assure the right ofthe counsel – subject executes an essential exculpate function - is considered to be an indispensable condition for ensuring the principle of fair litigate, giving criminals the change to access to justice and proceeding in criminal has its intrinsic democratic nature - Cause 2: At present, laws determine in specific legal status ofthe judiciary bodies with defenders is different, to a degree that there yet to have legal and practical equality In social terms, lawyer has not been recognized as an independent judiciary, so he has not been involved more in state of law building process and democratizing aspects of life, have yet cover all the provision of legal services to citizens, especially underserved regions, economic zones, rural areas, mountainous areas, islands,… To a certain extent, the judiciary bodies, other state bodies and society perception on the position, the role oflawyer is disregarded, indifferent and place this important professional in general position of interaction and criticism as constituting constituent judicial operators - Cause 3: On theother hand, also pay attention tothe fact that some lawyers lack of professional skills and ethics, so throughout practice of profession process, only interests in customer’s benefits at all costs, resulting in poor awareness, behaviors and actions tothe judiciary bodies andother state bodies, born the idea of “your right, my right”, lead tothe risk of law violation, ethics and behaviors in practice Therefore, the correct concept of opponency relationship between criminal procedure functions, identify essence ofrelationship between lawyerandthe judiciary bodies andother state bodies is important in each lawyer’s practice in profession When performing their social function, lawyer also contributes to build socialist state law process, guarantee of human rights, the bridge to transmit, bring law into society, healthy society relationshipand is the basic to help each lawyer have a right choice of behavior 1.4 Nature ofrelationship 1.4.1 Therelationship between lawyerand judiciary bodies Lawyer contact, accurately identify judiciary bodies, officials to participate in the lawsuit, participate in interrogation sessions, work between investigators, procurators and judges withthe defendant; carry out some activities, operations, skills, exercise the rights and obligations, what should be done and what should not ofthe defense counsel in criminal lawsuit… Lawyer must know how to apply, being flexible, proper when involved in each sphere of work or litigation stage, makes requests or recommendations, petitions are accurate and appropriate (1) Attitudes and behaviors when participate in lawyer’s court (and through lawyer, is client’s attitudes behaviors) tothe litigants position, the role oflawyer in the litigation Art 22, LAW On Lawyers 2006 Art 24, Art 76 Civil Procedure Law 2015 Art 76, Criminal Procedure Law 2015 shows objective truth ofthe case, on the basic of protecting the client’s rights and benefits Perception and behaviors in life, ensure in handling these relationships in a healthy, standard way, without engaging, mediating and interconnecting judiciary bodies and officials into illegal act, or deliberately misleading the acquaintance to influence the client’s choice of lawyer; defame, offend, affect the reputation of judiciary bodies.(2) 1.4.2 Therelationshipofthelawyerandother state bodies: When working with representational behavior outside litigation, thelawyer advises or provides some legal vevices to customer The scope of this relationship is often more fexcible, abundant and multitorm than he hard standard when joining the litigation in criminal case It is this difference that thelawyer defy some have priciple such as preparing posture, attitude, action and behavior to state bodies or the person being responsible for solving the work, demand of customer The state bodies are subjects that thelawyer often exchange, contact They have a lot of different rank and form, expand all field of life and society In order to have standard behavior an attitude and respond the demand of customers, the lawye need understand jurisdiction, function and duty of state bodies, person being reposible for solving the work as well as process, solving-time, limit of advise and obility to respond demand of customer On theother hand, this relationship also have many conflict because thelawyer can't respond demand of customers, they will be angry and complain, report to rise suddenly in rank and untrue Therefore, this effects negatively to solving-process as well as prestige of state bodies Obeying and using principle ofthe moral andthe behavior Art 9, LAW On Lawyers 2006 correctly will help thelawyer reach belief from customer, andthe respect from state bodies to them 1.5 authorities The behavior ofthelawyer in relationshipwith proceeding According to Rule 23 in Vietnam Ethical Rules and Code of Conducts for Lawyers (Issued in accordance with Decision 68/QD-HDLSTQ 20th July 2011 of national lawyer council)(3) - Lawyers must stricly comply withthe regulations in relation to judiciary bodies; cooperate, respect and remain polite with those officials in the judiciary bodies This is clearly provided in this principle - Lawyer can exchange professional opinion with officials in the judiciary bodies during the process of case handling, if necessary and beneficial to client, however, still remain independent, not affected by other opinion which affect the protection for clients However, the perception ofthe scope of contact, location of contact and understanding of what is "exchange of professional opinion" with officials in the judiciary bodies should be clarified The contact and exchange in principle should be conducted openly, at the office ofthe judiciary bodies, in the office hours, related mainly tothe exchange of grounds for conviction and evidence, provided collected document by lawyers, verified or requested justifyings to protect legitimate interests, change the preventive measures for client, Lawyers need to acknowledge the contact and exchange of opinions on the business is necessary and beneficial to client, so must be independent, not dominated or depended on other opinions which may affect their opinions, defense plans, protect clients' legitimate interests - At court, lawyers comply withthe court’s regulation, respect judiciary council, representative from procuracy; well behave when practice the witnesses andother Vietnam Ethical Rules and Code of Conducts for Lawyers (Issued in accordance with Decision 68/QD-HDLSTQ 20th July 2011 of national lawyer council) involved persons; not speculate subjectively to convict other person or have words to harm the client; not postpone or delay the judiciary proceedings by unreasonable or immoral manner In fact, some lawyer’s point of view always covers subjectivity, the issue that needs to be differentiated is avoiding unilateral and subjective aware cause that words, actions and documents sent judiciary bodies have the words and sentences which are provoking, shooting, accusing others This often happens in practice, either because the attorney's position is based on different interests ofthe client, or because ofthe lack of restraint resulting in a personal disregard for the content ofthe dispute case - In arguments, lawyers must quote legal, important evidence to help solve the case objectively, legally as well as protect the laywer’s opinion resolutely On theother hand, practical participation in the proceedings in the criminal case shows that point of view, lawful evidence and legal basis that are important to resolve the case objectively and legally are not surely considered by the trial panels In the dabate, Lawyers need to have a cultural and standardized atitude, both presit in protecting legitimate, justifiable point of view and arguments and adjust in a timely manner, record grounded view of procurator andLawyers protecting people who have conflicting interests with their customer, to advoid to be considered as - Lawyers remain calm and have rights to request reasonably, legally against misbehaviours such as disrespect ofthelawyer or laywer’s client at thecourt as well as during the judiciary proceedings + Remarks ofthe apprentice's report, which clearly state the strengths and limitations ofthe qualifications, professional qualifications, practicing skills, sense of law observance, sense of discipline andthe implementation Vietnam Ethical Rules and Code of Conducts for Lawyersof apprentice + Enthusiastic, responsible for coaching the apprentice; take full responsibility for the affairs that an apprentice performs according to his or her assignment and direction - Lawyer trainers are forbidden from the following: + Discriminate or personal mistreatment withlawyer apprentice Request for money, physical benefits from laywer apprentice apart from the fees as regulated by the Viet Nam Bar Federation + Take advantage ofthe role as laywer trainer to force the apprentice to activities not in the range of training to serve for the personal benefit ofthe trainer 2.4 Practice In fact, there are some lawyers who defame their co-workers For example, on 20/08/2017, an article was published reporting: A lawyer was asked to consider disciplinary action against a social networking colleague Thelawyer is called Vo An Don The reason for the disciplinary review oflawyer Vo An Don is due to "On the social networking site (facebook: Vo An Don) has many articles defamation lawyer, posted the clip interview between lawyer Vo An Don and foreigners withthe contents of incitement, distortion is not true, negatively affect the prestige ofthe Party, the State andthelawyersof Vietnam " The notice also stated that when the management board ofthe Phu Yen Bar Association invited to work, lawyer Don did not acknowledge and agree tothe authorities to verify and clarify To date, there have been some articles and clips that lawyer Don have admitted tothe authorities As a result, the management board ofthe Phu Yen Bar Association noticed that there were signs of violations the regulations of Law on Lawyers, the Charter of Vietnam Bar Federation, Ethical rules and code of conducts So, they have transferred the file tothe Disciplinary Board to review his discipline as required It is known that Phu Yen Provincial Police also worked withlawyer Vo An Don on this lawyer writing information on Facebook in 2016 It can be seen that these phenomena are supposed to affect the prestige of lawyers, the Party, the State and society Since then, the Standing Committee of Vietnam Bar Federation has asked the provincial and municipal Bar Associations to disseminate and thoroughly understand lawyers' members in the implementation ofthe Party's and State's undertakings and policies If lawyers are found guilty, they shall be remedied, promptly and resolutely handling cases of deliberate violations of law or ethics or recidivism as provided for by the Charter of Vietnam Bar Association CHAPTER 2: DUTIESOFLAWYERTOTHECOURTANDOTHERPUBLICAGENCIES;RELATIONSHIPWITHOTHERLAWYERS IN FRANCE INTRODUCTION When a student become a lawyer, many duties are needed to him A duty is a moral obligation that a person has towards someone else It can be a duty created by the law, the moral or social conventions The profession oflawyer is defined by principles expressed in the article ofthe « Reglement Interieur National de la Profession d’Avocat » : « l'avocat exerce ses fonctions avec dignité, conscience, indépendante, probité et humanité Il respecte en outre dans cet exercice les principes d'honneur, de loyauté, de désintéressement, de confraternité, de délicatesse, de modération et de courtoisie Il fait preuve l'égard de ses clients, de compétence, de dévouement, de diligence et de prudence » so it means « Thelawyer performs its functions with dignity, consciousness, independent, righteousness and humanity He respects besides in this exercise the principles of honor, loyalty, disinterestedness, fellowship, delicacy, moderation and courtesy He shows towards his customers, towards competence, towards dedication, towards diligence and towards caution » Thelawyer need to respect his different duties in front of every persons with whom he interacts This different persons are principally their clients There is also thecourtwiththe judiciary, thepublic agencies and all the community which means all the population In order to become a lawyer, each student, at the end of his training pronounce the lawyer’s oath which is in French « je jure, comme Avocat, d’exercer les fonctions avec dignité, conscience, indépendance, probité et humanité » The translation is « I swear, as a lawyer, to exercise my functions with dignity, conscience, independence, probity and humanity » This little sentence is a very concise summary ofthedutiesofthelawyer towards all the people he is going to interact during his career A lawyer will be confronted principally to his client but also to his colleagues andtothe publics agencies So that all the relations between all this different persons happens the best as possible Thelawyer profession is regulated and submit to professional and deontological rules govern by the law ofthe 31 december, the decree ofthe 27 november 1991 andthe decree ofthe 12 july 2005 The first Ethic Code appeared withthe ordinance of October 1535 withthe creation of a disciplinary board which will persists until 1662 In France, thelawyer profession was reorganized by the law n°71-1130 dated December 31 1971 andthe decree dated June 9th 1972 Today, the profession is supervise by the Intern Rules ofthelawyer profession (règlement intérieur national de la profession d’avocat) I THEDUTIESOFTHELAWYER When thelawyer takes his oath, he bind himself to respect different principes and respect theduties link to his profession The different principes anddutiesthelawyer promises to respect with his oath are : - the principe of independence - the principe of loyalty - the principe of confidentiality - the respect ofthe professional secret - the duty of information, advice and diligence 1.1 The principe of independence The principe of independence is defined in the first article from the law ofthe 31 december 1971 which dispose that : « La profession d’avocat est une profession libérale et indépendante » In english that means that thelawyer profession is a liberal and independent profession Firstly, thelawyer is independent of his client This independence means that thelawyer is free to accept a case or not He can refuse a case when he is incompetent in the domain ofthe case the client submit to him However we can observe that this principe is alter by economics realities because it can put the cabinet in danger if thelawyer refuse to much folders There are also deontological limits to this principe In case there is a conflict of interest or just a risk of it, thelawyer can be forced to refuse a case The conflict of interest is a situation where a person is submit to different interests because of his functions or responsibilities The conflict of interest appears when there is a contention between the general interest thelawyer has to defend and his own interests In a second way, thelawyer is independent ofthecourt In order to maintain a confidence link between thelawyerand his client, thelawyer must not be linked tothecourtand need to be free to accomplished all the acts he has to for the purpose to defend his client To confort this independence, thelawyer enjoys immunity for what he said in front ofthecourtto protect his freedom of speech Every speechs pronounce in front theCourt could not be sue in justice for defamation, insult or outrage The freedom of speech is limited for thelawyer in front ofthecourt by the necessary protection of others reputation as well as the guarantee of justice authority and its impartiality This immunity is a protection which knows limits because it is working only for the saying concerning the case and linked tothe caused thelawyer has to defend This immunity is present in the law at the paragraph ofthe article 41 from the law ofthe 29 july 1881 andthe limit of his immunity appears in case of defamatory or extraneous facts compared to te affair which remind la Cour de cassation 1.2 The principe of loyalty In the principe of loyalty we find once more the concept of conflict of interest Loyalty means that he should stay faithful thanks to his commitments Loyalty is a real obligation for thelawyerto not abandon his client even when there are complications Thelawyer is prohibited from the defense of two parties when the interests of this two parties can be oppose Moreover, the principe of loyalty depends ofthe principe of contradictory which forced thelawyerto communicate the parts ofthe file, the evidences and conclusion tothe adverse party To correctly fulfill his duty, thelawyer has to transmit every pieces within the time allowed by law Moreover, thelawyer must not simply respect a duty of loyalty towards his client but this principe is also present in his relations with his colleagues because thelawyer if confronted to a duty of loyalty and courtesy He have to observe rules of respect towards the magistrates Actually, in every circonstances, thelawyer must treat his colleagues with courtesy as an equal, just as he would like be treated The idea is that theotherlawyer is also a member ofthe same bar association et deserve consideration 1.3 The principe of confidentiality The confidentiality cover all the communication between thelawyerand his client but also between thelawyerand all the members ofthe judiciary system This rules applies also for all the informations tothe knowledge ofthelawyer during exchange withthe adverse party This obligation concern all the communications wether it is written or oral communications This principe means that a lawyer can not used a private communication in justice and can not found his argumentation on a communication between a lawyerand his client This obligation of confidentiality applies tothe datas concerning the client but also for the ones concerning a partner ofthe client, a debtor or every person involve in the debate However we can notice that the principe of confidentiality does not apply for the communications between thelawyerandthe ordinal authority according to a decision the civil chamber of la Cour de cassation dated from the 22 september 2011 1.4 The respect ofthe professional secret The professional secret is extremely linked tothe principe of confidentiality In all his relations with his client, oral or written, he has to keep an absolute secret about what was evoked during the different meetings If he broke the secret, thelawyer is punished by the law according tothe article 226-13 ofthe Penal Code which provide on year of prison and 15 000 euros of penalty The secret in thelawyer profession is codify by Napoleon in the Penal Code at the article 378 which dispose that everything thelawyer learn during the exercise of his profession is secret : « Les médecins, chirurgiens et autres officiers de santé, ainsi que les pharmaciens, les sages-femmes et toutes autres personnes dépositaires, par état ou profession ou par fonctions temporaires ou permanentes, des secrets qu'on leur confie, qui, hors le cas où la loi les oblige ou les autorise se porter dénonciateurs, auront révélé ces secrets, seront punis d'un emprisonnement d'un mois six mois [*durée*] et d'une amende de 500 15000 F [*taux résultant de la loi 85-835 du août 1985*] [*infraction, sanction*] » Moreover, the professional secret is protect by the CEDH which is the european convention of human rights which shows his importance in the judiciary system Even the client doesn’t have the possibility to raise thelawyer from this duty No one can pick up thelawyer from this secret, neither the client or « le bâtonnier » who is at the head ofthe Bar association Thelawyer can’t reveal confidences or secrets he receive from his clients He can’t communicated folder pieces except to his opponent He can’t testimony on the facts of which he was aware during the exercise of his functions This is the guarantee of a real defense for the best interests ofthe citizens or the enterprises There are hypothesis in which the professional secret ofthelawyer can be lifted It can be by law justification or following a state of necessity The state of necessity matches withthe cases in which thelawyer can raise the professional secret in order to assure a better defense of his client or when he his in the necessity to defend himself in front theCourtThe respect of this important duty by thelawyer is a guarantee for the client and a fundamental right which belongs to him This allows a faithful relationship between the judiciary system andthe community Linked tothe professional secret, it is also necessary to mention the duty of information, advice and diligence under the authority ofthelawyer 1.5 The duty of information, advice and diligence There are mainly two types of services offers by a lawyerto his client, the first one is the judicial advice andthe second one is the representation in court Receive informations is a right for the client but more than that it is also an obligation for thelawyerThelawyer must respect the instruction given to him et act carefully and diligently in accordance tothe interests of his client He must deploys all the judicial wherewithals appropriate to accede to his client’s rights - The duty of diligence : To act diligently, thelawyer must have an important degree of attention with regards tothe concern of his client He needs to be very careful when he addresses his client to inform him about the different duties, rights and obligations he might have to faced Thelawyer goal is to put in application the most suitable solution - The duty for information and advice : The principal informations thelawyer has to give to his client is the chance of success of case in front thecourt as well as the different remedies at the use ofthe client, the progress andthe evolution ofthe case andthe approximate amount ofthe fees II THERELATIONSHIPOFTHELAWYER 2.1 Therelationshipofthelawyerwith his client The choice ofthelawyer is primary for the client because ofthe faithful relation needed by this association between the client andthelawyerThe client makes his choice according tothe knowledges and specialities ofthelawyer but also taking into account his personality The client is totally free in the choice of his lawyer however thelawyer can refuse the request made to him This opportunity permit a guarantee tothe mutual trust and transparency which are two fundamental elements for good performance During the first meeting, the client can asks every question to his lawyer, he has to transmit all the informations retables tothe case which includes his personal situation, his project, his conflict The meeting is also the moment to implement a fee agreement in order to avoid any misunderstanding and risk of futur conflict During the relation with his client, thelawyer maintains control over the argumentation in front ofthe courts If the behavior ofthe customer puts in danger these principles, for example, by trying to impose on thelawyer a line of defense which the latter considers inconvenient or by questioning its work or its competence, thelawyer can release with complete impunity the fulfillment of its mission and restore the case to his client while perceiving fees for the already achieved diligences Thelawyer has a duty of information and advice to his client Minister of justice considered in a ministerial answer of February 1st 2011 that the failure to respect by a lawyerof his ethical and professional obligations may pull disciplinary measures going ofthe warning tothe radiation including the temporary ban to practice Furthermore, the civil liability ofthelawyer can be engaged Indeed, thelawyer which advises to his customer a careless or absurd defence system, is lacking in its obligation of advice, so that its civil liability can be committed by his client The client can also engage the penal responsibility ofthelawyerThelawyer necessarily has to sign an insurance of professional responsibility within the framework of its activity, what establishes an important guarantee for the client In case of professional misconduct ofthe lawyer, the customer can receive a compensation 2.2 Therelationshipofthelawyerwith his colleagues In his relations with his colleagues, thelawyer if confronted to a duty of loyalty and courtesy He have to observe rules of respect towards the magistrates This particular function of judicial costume not allowed his owners it use it outside theCourt or outside special manifestation as a colleague burial or the taking of an oath from a young lawyer It is formally forbidden to receive a client or going home dress withthe judicial costume In every circonstances, thelawyer must treat his colleague with courtesy as an equal, just as he would like be treated The idea is that theotherlawyer is also a member ofthe same bar association and deserve consideration This brotherhood make that a lawyer will not be opposed to a request for referral asked by a colleague who did not have the time to prepare his defense as long as it is not contradictory withthe interests of his client The brotherhood is thus of a nature to permit a loyal debate Thelawyer must not criticize the competence, the conduct, the advice andthe work of his colleagues He must however be ready, to advise andto represent a client with regard to a complaint which concerns another lawyerThelawyer answers for a reasonable deadline all the letters andthe communications which are sent to him by otherlawyers which ask for an answer The use of wearing of professional costume is old and came for a double problem It underline tothepublicthe authority attached tothe exercise of this important service which is the judicial one but also it ensures a decent behavior and equality between the members ofthe bar association 2.3 Therelationshipofthelawyerwiththeother agencies Thelawyer profession andthe magistrature are complementary and very opposed at the same time Each profession complete theother one by the fact that it can not be a decision of justice render without thelawyer intervention during the trial Moreover, thelawyer plays an important role all along the investigation, in amount ofthe trial One the same way, it can not be a decision of justice render without a magistrate even ofthe media influence seems mitigate the role ofthe judge Nevertheless, the two professions, extremely linked, are opposed by their principal cause The first mission ofthelawyer is the defense of his client’s interests and don’t have vocation to be impartial while the principal mission pf the magistrate is the defense ofthe common interest, he has a mission ofpublic interest La cour de cassation, which is like the Supreme Court in a french version, reminds the principe of freedom of speech in the exercise oftherelationship between lawyersand magistrates when she admits the fact that a lawyer can criticize the action of a magistrate CONCLUSION To create a good tradition and keep the trust and respect ofthe people, lawyersand lawy practicing organizations think and act exemplary Lawyers must know how to keep themselves under control, don’t go for the shortsighted interests that tarnished the long-built reputation The bright future for lawyer is waiting ahead withglory and, of course, challenges REFERENCE MATERIALS (1) Civil Procedure Law 2015; (2) Criminal Procedure Law 2015; (3) Law On Lawyers 2006; (4) Circular 19/2013/TT-BTP; (5) Vietnam Ethical Rules and Code of Conducts for Lawyers, Issued in accordance with Decision 68/QD-HDLSTQ 20th July 2011 of national lawyer council) (6) Circular 19/2013/TT-BTP; (7) Minh Thu, 2012, "Ethical Education ofthe Vietnamese Nation" Taken from: http://www.vnq.edu.vn/tap-chi/nghien-cuu-trao-doi/958-giao-duc-truyen-thong-dao-duccua-dan-toc- viet-nam.html, visited date: 04/09/2017 (8) http://www.arcade-avocats.com/publication-25618-la-relation-entre-le-client-et-lavocat.html (9) https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01228509/document (10) https://www.sav-fsa.ch/de/documents/dynamiccontent/awr_2010_06-07_s_265276a.pdf (11) Le Règlement Intérieur National : https://www.cnb.avocat.fr/fr/reglement-interieurnational-de-la-profession-davocat-rin (12) http://fouche-avocat.fr/la-confraternite-entre-avocats/ (13) http://www.documentissime.fr/dossiers-droit-pratique/dossier-94-l-avocat/-le-role- del-avocat/les-obligations-de-l-avocat.html GROUP MEMBERS Full name Student’s code Bùi Thị Hồng Thi K155021276 Trần Nguyễn Phước Thông K155041485 Camille Delaporte Juliette Grangeon ... Chapter DUTIES OF LAWYER TO THE COURT AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES; RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWYERS IN FRANCE 26 INTRODUCTION 26 I THE DUTIES OF THE LAWYER 27 1.1 The principe of. .. Chapter DUTIES OF LAWYER TO THE COURT AND OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES; RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWYERS IN VIETNAM I PRINCIPLES OF LAWYER RELATION BETWEEN JUDICIARY BODIES AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES... II THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE LAWYER 33 2.1 The relationship of the lawyer with his client 33 2.2 The relationship of the lawyer with his colleagues 34 2.3 The relationship of