1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

DSpace at VNU: ON THE VOLUME SET OF POINT SETS IN VECTOR SPACES OVER FINITE FIELDS

5 139 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 5
Dung lượng 141,6 KB

Nội dung

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 141, Number 9, September 2013, Pages 3067–3071 S 0002-9939(2013)11630-8 Article electronically published on June 4, 2013 ON THE VOLUME SET OF POINT SETS IN VECTOR SPACES OVER FINITE FIELDS LE ANH VINH (Communicated by Jim Haglund) Abstract We show that if E is a subset of the d-dimensional vector space over a finite field Fq (d ≥ 3) of cardinality |E| ≥ (d − 1)q d−1 , then the set of volumes of d-dimensional parallelepipeds determined by E covers Fq This bound is sharp up to a factor of (d − 1), as taking E to be a (d − 1)-hyperplane through the origin shows Introduction Let q be an odd prime power, and let Fq be a finite field of q elements The distribution of the determinant of matrices with entries in a restricted subset of Fq has been studied recently by various researchers (see, for example, [1, 2, 5, 6] and the references therein) In particular, Covert et al [2] studied this problem in a more general setting They examined the distribution of volumes of ddimensional parallelepipeds determined by a large subset of Fdq More precisely, for any x1 , , xd ∈ Fdq , define vol(x1 , , xd ) as the determinant of the matrix whose rows are xj s The focus of [2] is to study the cardinality of the volume set vol(E) = {vol(x1 , , xd ) : xj ∈ E} A subset E ⊆ Fdq is called a product-like set if |E ∩ Hn | |E|n/d for any nd dimensional subspace Hn ⊂ Fq Covert et al [2] showed that if E ⊆ Fdq is a product-like set of cardinality |E| q 15/8 , then F∗q ⊆ vol(E) When E ⊆ F3q is an arbitrary set, they obtained the following result Theorem 1.1 ([2, Theorem 2.10]) Suppose that E ⊆ F3q of cardinality |E| ≥ Cq for a sufficiently large constant C > There exists c > such that | vol(E)| ≥ cq In this short note, we show that under the same condition, E determines all possible volumes More precisely, we will prove the following general result Theorem 1.2 When E ⊆ Fdq and |E| ≥ (d − 1)q d−1 , vol(E) = Fq Remark 1.3 The assumption |E| ≥ (d − 1)q d−1 is sharp up to a factor of (d − 1), as taking E to be a (d − 1)-hyperplane through the origin shows Received by the editors October 1, 2011 and, in revised form, December 5, 2011 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification Primary 11T99 This research is supported by the Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development, grant No 101.01-2011.28 c 2013 American Mathematical Society 3067 Licensed to Univ of Calif, San Diego Prepared on Mon Mar 14 09:00:20 EDT 2016 for download from IP 184.163.96.66/132.239.1.230 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 3068 L A VINH Note that the implied constant in the symbol ‘ ’ may depend on the integer parameter d We recall that the notation U V is equivalent to the assertion that |U | ≥ c|V | holds for some constant c > Preparations Recall that vol(x1 , , xd ) = x1 · (x2 ∧ ∧ xd ), where the dot product is defined by the usual formula u · v = u1 v1 + + ud vd The generalized cross product, also called the wedge product, is given by the identity ⎞ ⎛ i ⎜ u2 ⎟ ⎟ u2 ∧ ∧ ud = det ⎜ ⎝ ⎠, ud where i = (i1 , , id ) indicates the coordinate directions in Fdq 2.1 Geometric incidence estimates One of our main tools is a two-set version of the geometric incidence estimate developed by D Hart, A Iosevich, D Koh, and M Rudnev in [4] (see also [3] for an earlier version and [2] for a function version of this estimate) Note that going from one-set formulation in the proof of [4, Theorem 2.1] to a two-set formulation is just a matter of inserting a different letter into a couple of places Lemma 2.1 ([4, Theorem 2.1]) Let B(·, ·) be a nondegenerate bilinear form in Fdq For any E, F ⊆ Fdq , let νt,B (E, F) = E(x)F(y), B(x,y)=t where here and throughout the paper E(x) denotes the characteristic function of E We have νt,B (E, F) = |E||F|q −1 + Rt,B (E, F), where |Rt,B (E, F)|2 ≤ |E||F|q d−1 , if t = As a corollary of Lemma 2.1, D Hart and A Iosevich [3] derived the following result Corollary 2.2 ([3, 4]) For any E, F ⊆ Fdq , let E · F = {u · v : u ∈ E, v ∈ F} We have F∗q ⊆ E · F when |E||F| q d+1 We also need the following corollary Corollary 2.3 Let B(·, ·) be a nondegenerate bilinear form in Fdq × Fdq For any E ⊂ Fdq \(0, , 0), let B ∗ (E) = {B(x, y) : x, y ∈ E}\{0} Licensed to Univ of Calif, San Diego Prepared on Mon Mar 14 09:00:20 EDT 2016 for download from IP 184.163.96.66/132.239.1.230 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use POINT SETS IN VECTOR SPACES OVER FINITE FIELDS 3069 We have |B ∗ (E)| ≥ q − q + q 3/2 |E| + q 3/2 Proof For any x ∈ E, there exist at most q vectors y such that x · y = Hence, νt,B (E, E) ≥ |E|2 − q|E| (2.1) t∈F∗ q Lemma 2.1 implies that (2.2) νt,B (E, E) ≤ |E|2 + q 1/2 |E|, q for any t ∈ F∗q The corollary follows immediately from (2.1) and (2.2) 2.2 Cross-product set Let H be the d-dimensional vector space over a finite field Fq Let {v , , v d } be an orthogonal basis of H For any d vectors u1 , , ud ∈ H, each vector ui can be written uniquely as a linear combination of {v , , v d }, i.e d uij v j , uij ∈ Fq , ≤ j ≤ d ui = j=1 We have (2.3) u1 ∧ u2 ∧ ∧ ud = det (uij )di,j=1 v ∧ ∧ v d For any E ⊆ H, define ⎧ ⎨ ∗ (2.4) DE,d := det (uij )di,j=1 : ui = ⎩ d j=1 ⎫ ⎬ uij v j ∈ E, ≤ i ≤ d \{0} ⎭ For any x ∈ Fdq and E ⊆ Fdq , let gE (x) = #{(u1 , , ud−1 ) ∈ E d−1 : u1 ∧ ∧ ud−1 = x} Define the cross-product set of E: FE∗ = {x ∈ Fdq : gE (x) = 0}\{(0, , 0)} For any x ∈ Fdq \{(0, , 0)}, let Hx := x⊥ = {y ∈ Fdq : x · y = 0} It is clear that x ∈ FE \{(0, , 0)} if and only if there exist u1 , , ud−1 ∈ Hx ∩ E such that (2.5) u1 ∧ ∧ ud−1 = x It follows from (2.3), (2.4), and (2.5) that ∗ FE∗ ∩ {lx : l ∈ F∗q } = DE∩H x ,d−1 Hence, we have proved the following lemma Lemma 2.4 For any E ⊆ Fdq , we have |FE∗ | = ∗ DE∩H,d−1 , H∈G(d−1,d) where G(d − 1, d) is the set of all (d − 1)-dimensional subspaces of Fdq Licensed to Univ of Calif, San Diego Prepared on Mon Mar 14 09:00:20 EDT 2016 for download from IP 184.163.96.66/132.239.1.230 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 3070 L A VINH Proof of Theorem 1.2 The proof proceeds by induction We first consider the base case, d = We show that if |E| > 2q , then the cross-product set FE∗ is large From Lemma 2.4, we have |FE∗ | = (3.1) ∗ |DE∩H,2 | H∈G(2,3) Since each non-zero vector lies in (q + 1) two-dimensional subspaces of F2q , |E ∩ H| = (q + 1)|E| H∈G(2,3) Let GE(2,3) = {H ∈ G(2, 3) : |E ∩ H| > q}; we have |E ∩ H| > (q + 1)|E| − q|G(2, 3)| = (q + 1)|E| − q(q + q + 1) > q H∈GE (2,3) Corollary 2.3 implies that ∗ |DE∩H,2 |≥q 1− q + q 3/2 |E ∩ H| + q 3/2 , for any H ∈ G(2, 3) Since f (x) = − q + q 3/2 x + q 3/2 is a concave function on [q, q ], ∗ |DE∩H,2 | ≥ q H∈GE (2,3) H∈GE (2,3) ≥ q (3.2) 1− H∈GE (2,3) q2 q + q 3/2 |E ∩ H| + q 3/2 |E ∩ H| 1− q + q 3/2 q + q 3/2 > q − q −1/2 > q /2 It follows from (3.1) and (3.2) that |FE∗ | > q /2 Hence, |E||FE∗ | > q Corollary 2.2 implies that F∗q ⊆ E · FE∗ ⊆ vol(E) By choosing a matrix of identical rows, we have ∈ vol(E) The base case d = follows Suppose that the theorem holds for d − ≥ 3; we show that it also holds for d Similarly, we show that if |E| > (d − 1)q d−1 , then the cross-product set FE∗ is large Since each non-zero vector lies in (q d−1 − 1)/(q − 1) (d − 1)-dimensional subspaces of Fdq , |E ∩ H| = H∈G(d−1,d) q d−1 − |E| q−1 Let GE(d−1,d) = {H ∈ G(d − 1, d) : |E ∩ H| > (d − 2)q d−2 } Licensed to Univ of Calif, San Diego Prepared on Mon Mar 14 09:00:20 EDT 2016 for download from IP 184.163.96.66/132.239.1.230 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use POINT SETS IN VECTOR SPACES OVER FINITE FIELDS 3071 We have |E ∩ H| > H∈GE (d−1,d) q d−1 − |E| − (d − 2)q d−2 |G(d − 1, d)| q−1 (q d−1 − 1)|E| − (d − 2)q d−2 (q d − 1) q−1 d > q , = when q is sufficiently large (in fact, q > d is enough) Since |E ∩ H| ≤ q d−1 for each H ∈ GE(d−1,d) , |GE(d−1,d) | > q d /q d−1 = q (3.3) By induction hypothesis, for any H ∈ GE(d−1,d) , ∗ | = q − |DE∩H,d−1 (3.4) Putting (3.3), (3.4) and Lemma 2.4 together, we have |FE∗ | = ∗ |DE∩H,d−1 |> H∈G(d−1,d) ∗ |DE∩H,d−1 | > q(q − 1) > q /2 H∈GE (d−1,d) Hence, |E||FE∗ | > q d+1 Corollary 2.2 implies that F∗q ⊆ E ·FE∗ ⊆ vol(E) By choosing a matrix of identical rows, we have ∈ vol(E) This completes the proof of the theorem References O Ahmadi and I E Shparlinski, Distribution of matrices with restricted entries over finite fields, Inda Mathem 18(3) (2007), 327–337 MR2373685 (2008k:11127) D Covert, D Hart, A Iosevich, D Koh, and M Rudnev, Generalized incidence theorems, homogeneous forms and sum-product estimates in finite fields, European Journal of Combinatorics, 31 (2010), 306–319 MR2552610 (2010m:11014) D Hart and A Iosevich, Sums and products in finite fields: an integral geometric viewpoint, Radon transforms, geometry, and wavelets, Contemporary Mathematics, 464, Amer Math Soc (2008) MR2440133 (2009m:11032) D Hart, A Iosevich, D Koh, and M Rudnev, Averages over hyperplanes, sum-product theory in vector spaces over finite fields and the Erdă os-Falconer distance conjecture, Trans Amer Math Soc., 363 (2011), 3255–3275 MR2775806 (2012e:42008) L A Vinh, Distribution of determinant of matrices with restricted entries over finite fields, Journal of Combinatorics and Number Theory, 1(3) (2009), 203–212 MR2681305 (2011g:11056) L A Vinh, Singular matrices with restricted rows in vector spaces over finite fields, Discrete Mathematics, 312(2) (2012), 413–418 MR2852600 L A Vinh, On the permanents of matrices with restricted entries over finite fields, SIAM J Discrete Mathematics, 26(3) (2012), 997–1007 MR3022119 University of Education, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam E-mail address: vinhla@vnu.edu.vn Licensed to Univ of Calif, San Diego Prepared on Mon Mar 14 09:00:20 EDT 2016 for download from IP 184.163.96.66/132.239.1.230 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use ... Note that going from one -set formulation in the proof of [4, Theorem 2.1] to a two -set formulation is just a matter of inserting a different letter into a couple of places Lemma 2.1 ([4, Theorem... VINH Note that the implied constant in the symbol ‘ ’ may depend on the integer parameter d We recall that the notation U V is equivalent to the assertion that |U | ≥ c|V | holds for some constant... in vector spaces over finite fields, Discrete Mathematics, 312(2) (2012), 413–418 MR2852600 L A Vinh, On the permanents of matrices with restricted entries over finite fields, SIAM J Discrete Mathematics,

Ngày đăng: 16/12/2017, 00:13