Your trajectory is more important than w you are at any point in time

Your trajectory is more important than w you are at any point in time tài liệu, giáo án, bài giảng , luận văn, luận án,...

My skirt is more beautiful than yours * My skirt is more beautiful than yours. 1. Chúng ta hãy quan sát câu sau. Các bạn hãy di chuột vào từng từ một để biết thể loại từ của từ đó trong câu: (Các bạn cũng có thể kích chuột 2 lần vào 1 từ để biết thêm chi tiết về từ đó) My skirt is more beautiful than yours. 2. Các bạn hãy di chuột vào từng cụm từ một để biết chức năng của cụm trong câu: My skirt is more beautiful than yours. 3. Tại sao câu trên lại dịch như vậy? - My skirt – Chiếc váy của tôi. Trong đó “my” : có nghĩa là của tôi/ của tớ/ của mình…là tính từ sở hữu (possessive adjective) như your/ his/ her/ our/ their. Được dùng để bổ nghĩa cho danh từ. Gọi là tính từ sở hữu vì nó thể hiện tính chất sở hữu của người hoặc vật đối với danh từ đi sau nó (skirt). Danh từ (noun) “ skirt” – váy phụ nữ/ phần váy của áo đầm. - Is : Động từ “to be” – nghĩa là thì/ là/ ở chia ở thì hiện tại với chủ ngữ ở ngôi thứ 3 số ít như he/ she/ it. - More …. than : là hình thức so sánh hơn đối với tính từ và trạng từ dài. Đặt tính từ/ trạng từ ở giữa more… than, ta có cấu trúc như sau "S + v + more + long adjective/ adverb + than + noun/ pronoun".Trong đó, “more” nghĩa là nhiều hơn - là tính từ dạng so sánh hơn của much và many còn “than” là liên từ - có nghĩa là “hơn” (dùng để diễn đạt ý so sánh). Đối với so sánh hơn với trạng từ ngắn và tính từ ngắn chúng ta thêm đuôi "er" vào sau tính từ và trạng từ, ta có cấu trúc của so sánh hơn với tính từ/ trạng từ ngắn là "S + v + short adjective/adverb + er + than + noun/ pronoun". - Beautiful:có nghĩa là đẹp/ tốt/ hay là tính từ chỉ quan điểm, sự đánh giá. - Yours : là đại từ sở hữu (possessive pronoun) như mine/ his/ hers/ ours/ theirs/ its. Người ta dùng đại từ sở hữu để tránh khỏi phải nhắc lại tính từ sở hữu + danh từ đã đề cập trước đó ( your skirt). Nó có nghĩa: mine = cái… của tôi; yours = cái…. của (các) bạn, Do đó đại từ sở hữu được dùng để thay thế cho danh từ (“yours” = your skirt trong câu trên). => Do đó, cả câu trên được dịch là : Chiếc váy của tôi thì đẹp hơn chiếc váy của bạn. 4. Bài học liên quan: Nếu không hiểu rõ 1 trong các khái niệm trên - các bạn có thể click vào các links dưới đây để học thêm về nó. Danh từ (noun), Tính từ (adjective), Động từ (verb), So sánh (Comparision) , Tính từ sở hữu (possessive adjective) , Đại từ ( pronoun ) , Trạng từ ( Phó từ) ( adverb). Your trajectory is more important than where you are at any point in time Your trajectory is more important than where you are at any point in time Bởi: Joe Tye “Encountering obstacles after we’ve made a determination [to achieve a goal] isn’t just an indication we’re making progress It’s often the very thing required for victory.” Alex Lickerman MD: The Undefeated Mind: On the Science of Constructing an Indestructible Self During times of trouble, we often think of life as being more like a snap shot than a motion picture, and implicitly assume that things will never get better If your life has generally been improving over the past ten or twenty years, but you’re going through a rough spot now, there’s no reason to assume the upward trend will not resume, so long as you don’t quit and give in to self-pity and victim-itis However, you also must be honest with yourself If things have been steadily deteriorating for years and now you are in a crisis, it’s a safe bet that things won’t change unless you change Remember how at the outset we used the rocket ship illustration to show how a small change in direction can, if sustained over time, result in a huge alteration of the ultimate destination? This is a good place to remind your participants that times of difficulty and adversity are often where the greatest opportunity lies to alter your trajectory – to make those changes for which you simply cannot find the courage or motivation when things are going great 1/1 This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. The value of CDX2 and cytokeratins 7 and 20 expression in differentiating colorectal adenocarcinomas from extraintestinal gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: cytokeratin 7/20+ phenotype is more spesific than CDX2 antibody Diagnostic Pathology 2012, 7:9 doi:10.1186/1746-1596-7-9 Reyhan Bayrak (bayrakreyhan@yahoo.com) Hacer Haltas (hhaltas@hotmail.com) Sibel Yenidunya (sibelyn@yahoo.com) ISSN 1746-1596 Article type Research Submission date 15 November 2011 Acceptance date 23 January 2012 Publication date 23 January 2012 Article URL http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/7/1/9 This peer-reviewed article was published immediately upon acceptance. It can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in Diagnostic Pathology are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in Diagnostic Pathology or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/authors/instructions/ For information about other BioMed Central publications go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/ Diagnostic Pathology © 2012 Bayrak et al. ; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1 The value of CDX2 and cytokeratıns 7 and 20 expressıon ın dıfferentıatıng colorectal adenocarcınomas from extraıntestınal gastroıntestınal adenocarcınomas: cytokeratın 7−/20+ phenotype ıs more spesıfıc than CDX2 antıbody Reyhan Bayrak Hacer Haltas Sibel Yenidunya Department of Pathology, Fatih University Hospital, Ankara, TURKEY Address for correspondence Dr. Hacer Haltas Address: Department of Pathology, Fatih University Hospital 06510, Emek/Ankara, TURKEY Tel: +90 312 2035587 Fax: +90 312 2035460 e-mail: hhaltas@hotmail.com 2 ABSTRACT Background/Objective: Metastatic adenocarcinoma from an unknown primary site is a common clinical problem. Determining the cytokeratin (CK) 7/CK20 pattern of tumors is one of the most helpful procedures for this purpose since the CK7−/CK20+ pattern is typical of colorectal adenocarcinomas. CDX2, a critical nuclear transcription factor for intestinal development, is expressed in intestinal epithelium and adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of CDX2 expression and the CK7−/CK20+ phenotype in differentiating colorectal adenocarcinomas from pancreatic and gastric adenocarcinomas. Methods: CK7/CK20 staining pattern and CDX2 expression were evaluated in 118 cases of colorectal, 59 cases of gastric, and 32 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the CK7−/CK20+ phenotype and of CDX2 expression were analyzed. Results: The CK7−/CK20+ immunophenotype was expressed by 75 of 118 (64%) colorectal and 3 of 59 (5%) gastric tumors and was not observed in any pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The CK7+/CK20+ Are books more important than experience? Are books more important than experience? If someone who wants to learn how to swim or drive a car just reads through books and never experiences himself, he cannot be successful. This example can tell us how important it is to gain knowledge from experience. However, a larger knowledge is acquired from books since book is a good teacher. Almost everything can be learned through Book. In fact, book is more important than experience for three reasons. The first reason is that some knowledge cannot be learned from experience. It is undoubted that knowledge which is recorded by scientists or people from ancient times to present can only be acquired from books. Book not only give us excellent reference on things occurring in the past, but also offer many ideas on what is happening in the world today and even on what may go on in the future. Without recorded source like books, it is hard for us to inherit the large amount of precious knowledge from forefathers? Another example is that you can learn the outer space. Obviously, it is impossible for one to obtain such knowledge through experience. An additional reason why knowledge from books is estimated more valuable source is that it is not only a broad and major source but also an effective way to learn. Gaining knowledge from such source saves plenty of time and energy. It is not necessary for a college student to test every theory in experience. In contrast to experience, books help people understand theories more quickly and even much better. The last but not the least reason is that knowledge from experience is remarkably limited in comparison with knowledge gained from books. As human life is limited, if one wants to improve mental powers, one had better read books. As a matter of fact, reading books extend aid to develop personality and moral integrity. Above all, books enrich us with vast knowledge. In conclusion, it is argued that book is a more important source of knowledge than experience. Knowledge from such source is proven less errors and less time to gain. Knowing the value of books, people should spend more time of a day reading them to receive benefits for a intellectual and active life. Topic: which is more important , books or experience? Are books more important than experience? The brain is a large center for the storage of knowledge Our brain`s capability of responding to the external world is based on our knowledge We acquire this knowledge from books or through experience Although these are not the only ones, they are the fundamental sources of knowledge To gain knowledge from a book, one has to read the book, comprehend it, and memorize it, while in experience; everything is connected to practice and memory But generally they both are ways of acquiring knowledge and also, they both can be used effectively depending on the user`s capability of understanding Based on this I support that gaining knowledge from books is better Books are the works of writers They are written with full compliance with established laws When writers write, they would not include matters that are irregular and which sometimes deviate from the laws until an explanation with detailed proof is given But in experience, one can get quite acquainted with abnormal matters with abnormal matters, which would likely be excluded from books In experience proof is almost irrelevant A person who observes something to be true many times, he would conclude that it is true without proof The difference between knowledge gained from experience and knowledge gained from books can be clearly shown by looking at their time consumption Authors have specific knowledge of the subject matter Therefore the content of these books has been refined and is highly accurate As a result, acquiring knowledge from books requires relatively small time But in experience, knowledge is gained through trial and error This is highly time consuming since a person has to start all over again when he/she finds his/her knowledge to be inaccurate In my opinion books are more important sources of knowledge than experience because they are less likely to be inaccurate (because they are proven) and require less time Books avoid that risk that would be taken to gain knowledge from trial and error (experience) Although confined to basic laws, for those who comprehend well, books could give clues to those matters that are undefined Are books more important than experience? There is a saying that ot everything that is learned is contained in books ?I cannot agree with it more We should not ignore resources of knowledge other than books, such as experience First of all, experience teaches us much knowledge which rarely appears in books For example, no books teach us how to drive cars Most people learn driving by practice under the guidance of experienced drivers, and only by practicing himself, can one really learn how to drive Perhaps there are some books teaching driving, but people can hardly learn driving by merely reading manuals, as people can hardly learn swimming without jumping into the water Secondly, only from experience can people explore throughout the unknowns and gain new knowledge Knowledge on the first book comes from nowhere but experience Franklin discovered the electricity by his kit, Magellan found that the earth is spherical by sailing People find new knowledge from experience and write them into books It is in this way that humanbeing explore the world generation by generation However, I am not saying that knowledge from book is non-sense Books are the most available and most effective methods to gain knowledge People learn knowledge from books without painfully exploring the world himself, this is the value of books But nowadays there is a harmful thought that all knowledge can be found on books, and people need not experience by himself So it is worthy pointing out that, knowledge from experience is as important as, if not more important than those from books