Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 92 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
92
Dung lượng
5,42 MB
Nội dung
LandUseandLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysisusingRemoteSensingTechniques : TheCaseofHawassaTown,SouthernEthiopia Ayele Abebe Tumebo Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa, Ethiopia June, 2017 i LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town LandUseandLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysisusingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassaTown,SouthernEthiopia By: AYELE ABEBE TUMEBO Advisor: Dr DESALEGN WANA A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFIMENT OFTHE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OFTHE MASTERS OF ARTS IN GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENT STUDIES SPECIALIZATION IN GIS, RS AND DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa, Ethiopia June, 2017 ii LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the a research project prepared by Ayele Abebe entitled LanduseLandcoverchangedetectionanalysis by Usingremotesensing techniques: thecaseofHawassaTown,SouthernEthiopiaand submitted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for degree of Master of Arts ( Geography and Environmental Studies , Specialization : GIS , RemoteSensingand Digital Cartography) complies with the regulations ofthe University and meets the accepted standards with respected to Originality and quality Signed by the Examining Committee: External Examiner Dr Ermias Teferi Signature _ Date Internal Examiner Dr Solomon Mulugeta Signature _ Date Advisor Dr Desalegn Wana Signature Chairman, Department prof Mohammed Assen iii Date _ Signature _Date Declaration I hereby that the research project entitled LanduseLandcoverchangedetectionanalysis by Usingremotesensing techniques: thecaseofHawassaTown,SouthernEthiopia has been carried out by me under supervision of Dr Desalegn Wana, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa during the year of 2016/2017 as a part of Masters of Arts in Geography Environmental Studies, Specialized on GIS, RS and Digital Cartography I further declare that this work has not been submitted to any other University or Institution for the any award of any degree or diploma AYELE ABEBE Signature _ Date _ i LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Abstract This project examines theuseof GIS and RS in mapping landuselandcoverchange in Hawassa town between 1995 and 2016 so as to detect and analyze thechange that has taken in the town between these periods in order to achieve these the Satellite ofland sat TM for 1995, Landsat ETM for 2002, ASTER image for 2009 andLand sat for 2016 have been obtained and preprocessing using EARDAS IMAGINE The maximum likelhood algorism of supervised Image classification has been used to generate landuselandcover maps.Land useland classification, change map, accuracy assessment and confusion matrix by using Arc GIS For the accuracy ofthe classified LULCC maps the confusion matrix was used to drive The overall accuracy and kappa coefficient results were above the minimum and acceptable threshold level Aggregate rate of changes ofLanduseandlandcoverofHawassa town resulted that considerable change has occurred within twenty one (21) years from 1995 to 2016 Though the period of 1995 from 2016 there dramatic change in several LULC categories including that is , only bare land has decreased in (-40.6%), while the rest classes namely Settlement in +460.1%, wetland +66.6%, Agricultural land 14.4% and Vegetation coverage also increased by 6.4 % Accordingly more land brought under Settlement and Vegetation The project output stated that increase in settlement and vegetation coverage ofthe town resulted population pressure on landand there is awareness of society for reforestation programme the town ii LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Acknowledgment First and foremost, my extraordinary thanks go for my Almighty God Who made it possible to begin and finish this study successfully I would like to express my deepest gratitude and sincere thanks to my advisor Dr Desalegn Wana for his immeasurable and priceless support, constructive criticism and devoting precious time in reading, guiding, as well as correcting of this research Project , without whom this paper would not be in its present form I would also like to thank the Ethiopian Mapping Agency (EMA), National Metrological Agency (NMA) and Central Statistical Agency (CSA) Hawassa city Administration, Hawassa City planning Department andHawassa city Administration Agricultural office for providing me different data for this project Furthermore, I would like to thank my friends and classmates Samuel Hailu, Tewodrors Andergechew, Tagese Abiso, Desalegn Haile , Temesgen Senbetu , Paulos Ungamo , Desta Ashebo and others whose name is not listed here for their support and suggestions Finally, my heartfelt thanks go to my family for their support and encouragement during my Project work and to all others who directly or indirectly contributed to the success ofthe study iii LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Table of Contents Contents Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………ii Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………………………………iii Table of Contents iv Abbreviations vii CHAPTER ONE 1 INRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the Study 1.2 Statement ofthe problem 1.3 Objective ofthe Study -5 1.4 Significance ofthe project CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 The concept and definition oflanduseandlandcover 2.2 Landuselandcoverchange -7 2.3 Geographical information system for landuselandcoverchange -8 2.4 Application ofRemoteSensing for landuselandcoverchange .9 2.5 Image classification -10 2.6 Changedetectionanalysis -11 2.7 Causes, Consequences and trends oflanduseandlandcoverchange 12 2.8 Socio economic implication oflanduselandcover hange 13 2.9 Basic Concept in Image Analysis…………………………………………14 2.11 Accuracy assessment …………………………………………………… 15 2.10 Image classification……………………………………………………… 16 CHAPTER THREE 18 Methods and materials 18 3.1 Description of study area -.18 i LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 3.1.2 Population………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 3.2 Climate 20 3.2.1 Temperature -20 3.2.2 Rainfall -21 3.3.Methodology 22 3.3.1 Data collection 22 3.3.2 Basic concept in image analysis 22 3.3.3 Preprocessing 23 3.3.4 Geometric correction -24 3.3.5 Haze reduction and atmospheric correction -24 3.3.6 False color composite image preparation 25 3.4 Software& platforms -30 3.5 Image classification 30 3.5.1 Supervised classification 30 3.5.2.Maximum likelhood classification 30 3.5.3 Reclassifiation oflanduselandcover classes 30 3.6 development of classification scheme -36 3.7 Accuracy assessment -37 3.8 Kappa coefficient -37 Chapter four -39 Result and discussion -39 4.1 Landuselandcoverchange 39 4.1.1 Land sat thematic mapper (TM) data of 1995images -39 4.1.2 Land sat ETM data of 2002 images -41 4.1.3 Aster images of 2009 43 4.1.4 Land sat image data for 2016 -45 4.2 Accuracy assessment ofthe classification 47 4.3 Accuracy assessment ofthe 2095- 2016 images 48 4.4 Changedetectionanalysis 56 4.4.1 Landuselandcover change: rate and magnitudes of 1995to 2002 -60 ii LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 4.4.2 Landuselandcover change: rate and magnitudes of 2002to 2009 -63 4.4.3 Landuselandcover change: rate and magnitudes of 2009to 2016 66 4.4.4 Landuselandcover change: rate and magnitudes of 1995to 2016 70 4.5 Gain and loses oflanduse / landcoverchange 1995 -2016………………………………71 4.6 Summary oflanduselandcover changes from 1995 to 2016 -66 Chapter five 75 Conclusion and Recommendation 75 5.1 Conclusion -75 5.2 Recommendation -77 References 78 iii LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town List of Figures Fig 3.1 Location Map ofthe Study Area -19 Fig.3.2 Maximum & Minimum average temperature of study area 20 Fig 3.3Rainfall distribution ofthe study area 22 Fig 3.4 Atmospheric correction of 1995 image 26 Fig 3.5 Atmospheric correction of 2002 image -27 Fig 3.6 Atmospheric correction of 2009 image - 28 Fig 3.7 Atmospheric correction of 2016 image -29 Fig 3.8 Maximum likelihood classification &reclassification of study area 1995 32 Fig 3.9 Maximum likelihood classification &reclassification of study area 2002 -33 Fig 3.10 Maximum likelihood classification &reclassification of study area 2009 34 Fig 3.11 Maximum likelihood classification &reclassification of study area 2016 -35 Fig 4.1 LULC Map ofHawassa town in 1995 40 Fig 4.2 LULC Map ofHawassa town in 2002 -42 Fig 4.3 LULC Map ofHawassa town in 2009 -44 Fig 4.4 LULC Map ofHawassa town in 2016 -46 Fig 4.4.1 LULC Change Map between 1995 and 2002 60 Fig 4.4.2 LULC Change Map between 2002 and 2009 63 Fig 4.4.3 LULC Change Map between 2009 and 2016 -66 Fig 4.4.4 LULC Change Map between 1995 and 2016 69 Fig 4.4.4 Settlement changeofHawassa town 1995 and 2016 73 4.4.4 LULC changes ofHawassa town from 1995 and 2016 73 iv LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 4.4.3 Land Use/Land Cover Changes: Rate and Magnitude of 2009-2016 Fig4.8 LULC change map of (2009-2016) 65 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Table 4.4 Land use/Land cover conversion matrix for the year 2009-2016 2009 2016 LULCC 2009_2016 change LULU Types Area in Area in Area in Area in % Settlements 642.2 1954.9 0.671 67.1 Bare land 7293.1 3638.1 -1.00 -100 Agricultural land 2222.5 2257.7 0.0156 1.56 Vegetation 4894.7 7519.2 0.349 34.9 Wetland 667.6 351.7 -0.89 -89.8 Though the period 2009-2016 there substantial change in several LULC categories including settlements (0.671ha) and vegetation (0.349 ha) and agricultural land (0.0156 ha) area increased According to above table tendency towards more land brought under settlements, vegetation and agricultural land These data expressly stated that increase in settlements, Vegetation and agricultural land resulted population pressure on landand good government policies And decreased of bare landand wetland 66 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Table 4.4.7 Post-classification Matrix of Study Area between 2009 and 2016 year 20016 classes 2009 AL BL S V WL Total area(ha ) Tota l area Area (ha) % Area (ha) % Area (ha) % Area (ha) % Area (ha) % AL 413.91 2.6 1140.21 7.2 15.84 0.1 683.01 4.3 122.7 0.78 2375.7 15.1 BL 237.96 1.5 2762.28 17.5 0 325.71 2.0 76.95 0.5 3402.9 21.6 S 69.57 0.4 1620.27 10.3 353.9 2.3 0 23.58 0.5 2067.3 13.4 V 1470.51 9.3 1880.64 11.9 25.02 0.16 3827.88 24 295.1 1.9 7499.1 47.7 WL 21.96 0.1 126.9 0.8 7.56 0.04 50.67 0.3 144.4 0.9 351.54 2.2 2213.91 14.08 7530.3 47.9 402.3 2.5 4887.27 31 08 662.8 2213 91 15721 56 100 Grand Total According to the above Table 4.4.7 conversion matrix for the year 2009-2016, thechange in theland use/ landcover in the study area was by increase attributed to expansion of vegetation coverage (47.7%) and settlements (13.4%) and agricultural land (15.1%) This class has expanded at the expense of bare landand wetland Generally there is a sharp decrease of bare landand wetland in this period which goes to, vegetation, settlement and agricultural land 67 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 4.3.4 Land Use/Land Cover Changes: Rate and Magnitude of 1995-2016 Fig 4.9 Land use/Land cover conversion matrix for the year 2009-2016 68 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Table 4.3 Land use/Land cover conversion matrix for the year 2009-2016 1995 2016 LULCC 1995_2016 change LULU Types Area in Area in Area in Area in % Settlements 349 1954.9 0.821 82.1 Bare land 6122.4 3638.1 -0.683 -68.3 Agricultural land 1973.3 2257.7 0.126 12.6 Vegetation 7065.7 7519.2 0.06 Wetland 211.1 351.7 0.399 39.9 Though the period of 1995 to 2016 there is dramatic expansion of several LULC categories including settlements (0.821 ha) or (82.1 %), vegetation (0.06 ha) or (6 %), agricultural land (0.126 ha.) or (12.6%) and wetland (0.399 ha) or (39.9%) area increased and bare land decreased to (-0.683ha) or -68.3% According to above table tendency towards more land brought under settlement and Vegetation These data expressly stated that increase in settlement resulted pop Table 4.8 Post-classification Matrix of Study Area between 1995and 2016 year 2016 classes 1995 AL Area BL % (ha) Area S % (ha) Area V % (ha) Area WL % (ha) Area Total Total area(ha) area 0.07 2257.65 14.4 % (ha) AL 444.33 2.8 888.48 5.6 47.43 0.3 866.16 5.5 BL 286.65 1.8 2450.7 15.5 101.16 0.6 797.94 5.07 1.62 0.01 3638.07 23.1 S 1217.07 7.7 1350.18 8.5 380.43 2.4 7.38 0.04 7951.5 50.6 V 86.67 0.5 1381.14 8.8 0 54.81 0.04 1522.62 9.7 WL 25.2 0.16 51.93 0.04 132.03 0.8 136.08 0.04 351.72 Grand Total 0.3 2059.92 13.1 6122.43 38.9 4996.44 31.8 6.48 5151.51 32.7 69 11.25 2.2 2176.56 13.8 211.14 0.04 15721.56 100 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 4.5 Gain and loses ofland use/ landcoverchange (1995- 2016) Generally there is a continuous land use/land coverchange taking place for most parts oftheHawassa Town in the last 21 years Thelandcoverchange from 1995 to 2016 has been discussed in four periods Each period has seven years of gap i.e the first period from 1995 to 2002, second period 2002 to 2009,third period from 2009 to 2016 and last period has 21 years gap from 1995-2016 Thecover dynamics Discuss the rate oflandcoverchange from 1995 to 2002, 2002 to 2009, 2009 to 2016 and aggregate landcoverchange from 1995to 2016 Table 4.4.8 clearly shows thelandcoverchange rate for the past 21 years Table 4.5.1 Rate ofchange in land use/ land covers classes Land use/ PERIOD Landcover Classes Annual 1995 2002 2009 2016 ha h Annual Annual Aggregated rate of Rate of rate of rate ofChangechange (%) changechange (%) (1995(20092016) (%)(1995 (%) 2016) -2002) (20022009) Settlement 349.0 691.6 742.2 1954.9 +14 +1.03 +26.78 460.1 Bare Land 6122.4 4670.5 7193.1 3638.1 -3.45 +7.7 -74.6 -40.6 Agricultura 1973.3 6459.7 2222.5 2257.7 +32.5 -9.4 +0.71 +14.4 7065.7 3249.5 4894.7 7519.2 -7.7 +7.2 +53.5 +6.4 211.1 600.4 667.6 351.7 +26 -2.2 -6.44 +66 l Land Vegetation Wet land Vegetation shows the highest annual rate ofchange for 1995 to 2002, by -7.6 % per annum decrease andthe same scenario for bare land by -3.4% per annum while agricultural land , Settlement and Wetland shows +32.5% , +14% and +26.3 % per annum increment for the same time period Possibly due to destruction of vegetation and bare land for Fuel wood, Expansion of agricultural land, Timber production, Construction purpose and urban expansion 70 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town The second time period between 2002 to 2009 the rate ofchange shows significant decrease both in increment and decrease, that is, the maximum decrease is in Agricultural land class with 9.4% per annum and maximum increment is Vegetation +7.2 % per annum for class of bare land followed by Settlement with +7.7 % and +1.04% per annum respectively Agricultural land possibly decreased due to Expansions of settlement (Agricultural land changed in settlement), Secured Industrial areas ,Farmers transform (sells ) their lands for urban settler, Land grabbening The third time period is between 2009 to 2016 the rate ofchange also a shows significant decrease and increase both in increment and decrease, that is, the maximum decrease is in Bare land class with -74.6 % per annum and maximum increment is Vegetation +53.5 % per annum for class followed by Settlement with +26.78 % and bare land +0.4% per annum possibly Bare land decreases due to areas left for Industrial park construction , Institutional constructions, Residence constructed and Settlement increased and vegetation increased due to government policy encourage vegetation When we see the general scenario with reference to the aggregate rate ofchange indicates that only bare land has decreased in (-40.6%), while the rest classes namely Settlement in +460.1%, wetland +66.6%, Agricultural land 14.4% and Vegetation coverage also increased by 6.4 % Possibly Expansion settlement result: seasonal climate modification, decrease the amount of rainfall , increase temperature and decrease agricultural product and public awareness for theuse vegetation by planting urban forestry for Soil and Water conservation, shading and Ventlet their compounds 4.6 Summary oflanduselandcoverchange from 1995 to 2016 Table 4.6.1 Summary oflanduselandcoverchange in percentage from 1995to 2016 Years Settlement 1995 2002 2009 2016 2.2 3.8 4.1 12.4 Bare Agricultural Vegetation Wet Total LandLandland 38.9 12.6 44.9 1.3 100% 29.5 41.1 20.7 5.0 100% 46.4 14.1 31.1 4.2 100% 23.1 14.4 47.8 2.2 100% 71 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Fig 4.10 Settlement changes ofHawassa town from 1995 to 2016 72 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town LULC changeofhawassa town from 1995 to 2016 50.0 Percent Area coverage 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 Settlement 25.0 Bare Land 20.0 Agricultural Land 15.0 Wet land 10.0 Natural vegetation 5.0 0.0 1995 2002 2009 2016 Year Fig 11 LULC Changes ofHawassa town from 1995 to 2016 Though the period of 1995 from 2016 there is dramatic change in several LULC categories including settlements (1605.9 ha.) or (10.2%), vegetation (453.5 ha) or (2.9%) , agricultural land(284.4 ha.) or (1.8%) and wetland (140.6 ha) or (0.9) area increased and bare land decreased(-15.8%) According to above table tendency towards more land brought under settlement and Vegetation These data expressly stated that increase in settlement and vegetation coverage ofthe town resulted population pressure on landand there is policies encourage afforestation the town These growing demand of space for human settlement and commercial purpose is diminishing the amount and size of Arable (agricultural) land Expansion of construction of industrial park, commercial constructions, Hawassa university expansion, andHawassa international stadium are good increment of Settlements 73 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 5.1 CONCLUSIONS Based on the overall ofthe project works, it is possible to conclude the following points Remotely sensed images are vital in land use/land coverchangedetection as it provides spatial and temporal information ofthelanduselandcover condition oftheHawassa town Landuseandlandcoverchangedetection method used in this project was post classification Comparison which is very important in knowing the from- to change LULC changes have wide range of consequences at spatial and temporal scales Because of these effects and influences it has become one ofthe major problems for environmental change as well as natural resource management Identifying the complex interaction between changes and its drivers over space and time is important to predict future developments, set decision making mechanisms and construct alternative scenarios Land use/land cover is very dynamic in nature and has to be monitored at regular intervals for sustainable development thus it has become a central component in current strategies for managing natural resources The results of this project revealed the existence of significant landuseandlandcover changes in the last 21 years Especially the expansion of settlements and vegetation coverage at the expense of bare landLanduseandlandcoverchangeofHawassa town resulted that considerable change has occurred within twenty one (21) years from 1995 to 2016 Though the period of 1995 from 2016 there dramatic change in several LULC categories including settlements (1605.9 ha.) or (10.2%), Vegetation 453.5 or (2.9%), agricultural land 284.4 or (1.8%) and wetland (140.6 ha) or (0.9) area increased and bare land decreased(-15.8%) Accordingly more land brought under Settlement and Vegetation The project output stated that increase in settlement and vegetation coverage ofthe town resulted population pressure on landand there is good government policies for encourage reforestation programme the town 74 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town The second ranked change is to be transition from bare land area to vegetation This increased in due to increased awareness of public and good governmental policies to reforestation programmed ofthe country though an effort has be made success in the increasing of vegetation coverofthe town Aggregate the rate ofchangeofHawassa town from initial year to final (1995 to 2016 ) that is , only bare land has decreased in (-40.6%), while the rest classes namely Settlement in +460.1%, wetland +66.6%, Agricultural land 14.4% and Vegetation coverage also increased by 6.4 % Expansion Settlement and public awareness for the Plant vegetation Generally, geographic information system andremotesensinganalysis enables for sustainable managements of LULC change planning, wise decision making, monitoring of urban expansion and development 75 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town 5.2 Recommendations Landuselandcoverchange ( LULC ) mapping anddetectionof changes shown here may not provide the real figure of classes due to low resolution ofthe imagery but it serves as a base to understand the patterns and magnitude of LULCCs in the area Therefore such LU/LC detections using high resolution satellite images would be more dependable Rapid settlement increase has played a major role affecting LULC changeand there should be strategic planning to monitor abrupt urban expansions ofthe town from concerned governmental and none governmental bodies (offices) Population increase has played a major role on LULC changeand there should be strong family planning awareness creation campaigns with adequate health services from Concerned governmental and none governmental bodies (offices) To minimize the problems of landless youths, it will be imperative to create and strengthen off-farm income generating activities due to limited capacity ofland to accommodate additional population Promoting the development of none agricultural economy to the town peoples and conserving the forest by strong follow up and by creating reserved area for forest only Since most important factor ofthelanduse / landcoverchange in the study area was an increase in population, continuing the efforts of introducing family planning to make the people aware of consequences of population pressure on land resources should be carried out intensively Geographical information system andremotesensing technology for changedetectionanalysis is very important for the development of one country It is very important to deliver frequently This job demands professional experts who are accountable to this specific career However, important it is human power dedicated to this wing of development is very limited in skill and in number if it is based on Hawassa Town GIS data management Therefore, it requires a due regard to handle appropriately Ethiopian Government has given due attention for forest development and conservation considering its significance to the national economy , food security and sustainable development Hence it is advisable conserving and develop forest resource properly t 76 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town REFERENCES A, M ( 1999) Enviromental LandUseChangeDetectionand Assessment Using with Multi temporal satellite IMAGERY Zanjan University ABEBE, Z (2011) A Urban sprawl mapping andlandusechangeanalysisusingremotesensingand geographic information system (Case study of Debre Birhan town) Abera, L (2007) Assessing the Impacts ofLandUseandLandCoverChange on Ground Water Recharge UsingRemoteSensingand Geographic Information System Caseof Awassa Catchment, SouthernEthiopia Anderson, e (1976) A LandUseandLandCover Classification System for Use with Remote sensor Data Geological survey Professional Paper Washington D.C: U.S Government Anderson, J (1971) Landuse classification schemes used in selected recent geographic applications ofremote sensing: Photogramm 37, 379_387 Anderson, J R (1972) A land-use classification system for use with remote-sensor data 671 Chavez, P S (1996) Image-based atmospheric corrections—revisited and improved Photogrammetric Engineering andRemoteSensing Codjoe, S (2007) Integrating Remote Sensing, GIS, Census, and A Litreture Update.African Development Vol.XXXII (2), 197-212 Congalton, R G (1983) Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques Photogrammetric Engineering andRemoteSensing Congalton, R G (1983) Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques Photogrammetric Engineering andRemote Sensing, Congation, M (1998) A Quantitative Comparison ofChangeDetection Algorisms for Monitoring Eelrass from Remote Sensed Data Phoiogrametic Engineering & RemoteSensing 77 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Daniel, e a (2002) A comparson ofLanduseandLandcoverchangedetection Methods ASPRS-ACSM Annual Conference and Congress , XXII, ESRI (2006) Drivers of landuse change , Final report Matching Opporitunties to Motivations project Department of Sustainability and Environment, Australia Ettema D, D J (2007) multi-agent modelling of urban systems In modelling land-use change Netherland.: PUMA Foody, G M (12 March 2001) Status oflandcover classification accuracy assessmentaccepted (1 J 2001, Ed.) UK: Department of Geography, University of Southampton G, A B (1998) Radar interferometry for environmental changedetection In RemoteSensingChange Detection, (M A R S Lunetta and C D Elvidge (Chelsea, Ed.) Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications Gazed, B M (2004, June 7-9) LandCover Mapping of Khulna City Applying Remote Geospatial Information Research Inc, E (1992) ERDAS Production Service Map State for Georgia DNR in the Monitor J.F, O (1983) Monitoring Urban Land- Use in Developed Countries An aeral phoographic approach Jensen, J R (1996) Introductory Digital Image Processing, ( Second edition ed.) Koomen E, S J (2007) Modeling land-use change: progress and New York Lillesand, T a (1994) Remotesensingand image intepretation : John Wiley and Sons,inc Ne York Merer, W (1995) Past and Present Land-use andLandcover in the U.S.A Consequences U.S.A Meyer, W Changes in Landuse And Landcover: A Global Perspective Cambrige Univesity pres 78 LandUseLandCoverChangeDetectionAnalysis by UsingRemoteSensing Techniques: TheCaseofHawassa Town Riebsame, W , (1994) Modelling LanduseandCover as Part of Global Enviromental Change Climate change Shoshany, e a (1994) Monitoring Temporal Vegetation CoverChange in Mediteranean and Arid Ecosystem usingRemoteSensing Teching Journal of Arid Environment , 9-21 Singh, A (1989) Digital ChangeDetection Techinques Using Remotely Sensed Data International Journal ofRemoteSensing , 1, Survey, U G (1999, 10 11) USGS on the World Wide Retrieved 1999, from TheLand sat Satellite System Link, Retrieve, from : http://landsat7.usgs.gov/landsat_sat.html U.SEPA (1999) A Summary of Models for Assessing the Effects of Ohiot : U.S , Office of Research and Developmen: Enviromental Protection Agency Wilkie, D a (1996) RemoteSensing Imagery for Natural Resources New York: Colombia University Press 79 .. .Land Use Land Cover Change Detection Analysis by Using Remote Sensing Techniques: The Case of Hawassa Town Land Use and Land Cover Change Detection Analysis using Remote Sensing Techniques: The. .. vi &Reflection Land Use Land Cover Change Detection Analysis by Using Remote Sensing Techniques: The Case of Hawassa Town LULC Land Use Land Cover LULCC Land Use Ana Land Cover Change MCDE Multi... mixed uses But Land Use Land Cover Change Detection Analysis by Using Remote Sensing Techniques: The Case of Hawassa Town here there are classes which are both land use and land cover at the same