Analysis of distributed beamforming in cooperative communications network with phase shifter based smart antenna nodes

154 284 0
Analysis of distributed beamforming in cooperative communications network with phase shifter based smart antenna nodes

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

Analysis of Distributed Beamforming in Cooperative Communications Networks with Phase Shifter Based Smart Antenna Nodes by Tharunie Baleshan Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Engineering Queensland University of Technology Science and Engineering Faculty 2015 QUT Verified Signature To My Parents For their endless love, support and encouragement Keywords Smart antennas, Distributed beamforming, Cooperative diversity, Power Minimisation, SNR Maximisation, Array factor, Directivity, Field intensity Abstract Performance of wireless communications systems can be significantly improved by means of multiple antennas at communicating terminals However, due to limitation of the physical size and the cost, employing large number of antennas at communicating terminals becomes infeasible As a remedy, cooperative communication was proposed where different users share their antennas and thus cooperate for the source-to-destination communication It is desirable to maximise receiver quality-of-service (QoS) in terms of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and also to minimise the cost of transmission in terms of power Transmit power of relays and received SNR are major concerns in designing such a communication network and significant literature focusses on minimisation of the total transmit power of relays subject to received SNR or maximisation of the received SNR at the destination subject to total transmit power of relays However, most of these previous studies consider either single antenna relays or Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) relays Though the MIMO relays give better performance over single antenna relays, their hardware configuration is much more complex because each antenna requires a separate receiver/transmitter module Smart antenna systems can also improve the performance with only much simpler hardware, as they require only a single receiver/transmitter module Furthermore, above mentioned optimisations are often investigated separately and trade-off between those two optimisations is not fully explored Geographically separated relays can cooperatively adjust their amplitude and viii phase excitations and these excitations are calculated by optimising the performance of wireless communication An array’s radiation pattern can be continuously steered by adaptively changing the phase excitation of the antenna array without additional power in mobile communication Conventional approach to shape the beam is to maximise the field intensity at the destination However, in this research study maximising directivity is investigated for circular and linear arrays, and it is shown that directivity maximisation outperforms the field intensity maximisation to save power Hence, directivity maximisation is incorporated with distributed beamforming to analyse the performance improvement of the communication In addition to power minimisation in receive and transmit beamforming processes, directivity from each relay to the source and the destination is maximised For the transmit beamforming, the complex beamforming weight of each relay is then calculated to minimise the total transmit power of relays, while maintaining SNR at the destination above a predefined threshold We also calculated the total power gain achieved with the smart antenna system and compared it to the single antenna relays case with distributed beamforming Results show that the total power gain which exceeds the sum of the smart antenna gains can be achieved for high levels of the SNR thresholds at the destination Next, a comparison of relay power minimisation subject to received SNR at the destination and SNR maximisation subject to the total transmit power of relays for a typical wireless network with distributed beamforming is considered In this research study, it is shown that SNR maximisation subject to power constraint and power minimisation subject to SNR constraint yield the same result for a typical wireless network It is concluded that either one of the optimisation approaches is sufficient to simultaneously minimise the transmit power at the relays and to maximise the SNR at the destination 110 Appendix A MATLAB Code function direc= Directivity Bit optim(alpha m,M,q,P,phi r,phi m,theta0) AF=@(phi,theta) 0; for m=1:M x=@(phi,theta)exp(1j*(pi*q*csc(pi/M)*sin(theta).*cos(phi− phi m(m))−2*pi/2ˆP*alpha m(m))); AF=@(phi,theta) AF(phi,theta)+x(phi,theta); end y=@(phi,theta) abs(AF(phi,theta)).ˆ2.*sin(theta); den dir=integral2(y,0,2*pi,0,pi); direc= −1*abs(sum(exp(1j*−2*pi/2ˆP*alpha m).*exp(1j*pi*q *csc(pi/M)*sin(theta0)*cos(phi r−phi m))))* abs(sum(exp(1j*−2*pi/2ˆP* alpha m).*exp(1j*pi*q *csc(pi/M)*sin(theta0)*cos(phi r−phi m))))/den dir; A.3 Field Intensity Maximisation of Linear Antenna Array A.3.1 Field Intensity Linear.m %%%%%%%%% Field Intensity Maximisation clc clear M=5; q=.5; Field Intensity Linear Nobit(M,q) %%%%%%%%%% Appendix A MATLAB Code A.3.2 Field Intensity Linear Nobit.m function Field Intensity Linear Nobit(M,q) alpha m=[]; i=0; fin dir mat=[]; theta0=pi/2; for phi0=0:0.1:180 i=i+1; phi0 r=phi0*pi/180; % in radian for m=1:M if phi0 r>pi/2 phi0 r=pi−phi0 r; end b=−2*pi*(m−1)*q*cos(phi0 r); % required phase shift if b>0 b=b−2*pi; end alpha m=[alpha m b]; end %%%%%%%%%%%% E field %%%%%%%%%% m=0:M−1; c=@(phi0 1) sum(exp(1j*alpha m).*exp(1j*2*pi*m*q *sin(theta0).*cos(phi0 1))); d=@(phi0 1) abs(c(phi0 1)); num dir=d(phi0 r)ˆ2; Max F=d(phi0 r)/M; % Normalised radiation intensity %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 111 112 Appendix A MATLAB Code Max F mat(i)=Max F; Rx(i)=phi0; %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Denominator of Directivity %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% AF=@(phi,theta) 0; for m=1:M x=@(phi,theta)exp(1j*(2*pi*q*(m−1)*sin(theta).*cos(phi)+ alpha m(m))); AF=@(phi,theta) AF(phi,theta)+x(phi,theta); end y=@(phi,theta) abs(AF(phi,theta)).ˆ2.*sin(theta); den dir=integral2(y,0,2*pi,0,pi); %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% fin dir=4*pi*num dir/den dir; fin dir mat=[fin dir mat fin dir]; Rx(i)=phi0; alpha m=[]; end mu=mean(fin dir mat) vari=var(fin dir mat) plot(Rx,Max F mat,'g') % Plot for normalised field intensity xlabel('Angle of Direction of the destination') ylabel('Maximum Field Intensity') title('Field Intensity of Linear antenna array') figure(2) plot(Rx,fin dir mat,'r') % Plot for Directivity xlabel('Angle of Direction of the destination') ylabel('Directivity') Appendix A MATLAB Code 113 title(['M = ' num2str(M) '; q = ' num2str(q)]) figure hist(fin dir mat,180) title(['Histogram' ' M = ' num2str(M) '; q = ' num2str(q)]) xlabel('Directivity') ylabel('Frequency') figure [f1,x1,u1]=ksdensity(fin dir mat); plot(x1,f1) xlabel('Directivity') ylabel('Probability density') title(['Probability Density Function' ' M = ' num2str(M) '; q = ' num2str(q)]) A.4 Directivity Maximisation of Linear Antenna Array A.4.1 %%%%%% Directivity Linear.m Directivity Maximisation with and without %%%%%%%%%%%% Digital Phase Shifters clc clear M=3; % number of antenna elements q=0.5; % spacing between antennas=q*lamda Directivity Linear Nobit(M,q) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 114 Appendix A MATLAB Code A.4.2 Directivity Linear Nobit.m function Directivity Linear Nobit(M,q) theta0=pi/2; i=0; for phi0=0:0.1:180 % azimuth angle of direction of the destination i=i+1; phi0 r=phi0*pi/180; % in radian f=@(alpha m)Directivity Linear Nobit optim(alpha m,M,q,phi0 r, theta0); % function to optimise gs = GlobalSearch('Display','iter'); % Global seaarch optimisation if i==1 x0=zeros(1,M); gs.NumTrialPoints=4000; else x0=alpha m; gs.NumTrialPoints=200; gs.NumStageOnePoints=10; end ub=zeros(1,M); lb=zeros(1,M)−2*pi; lb(1)=0; problem = createOptimProblem('fmincon','objective', f, 'x0', x0, 'Aineq', [],'bineq', [], 'Aeq', [], 'beq', [], 'lb', lb, 'ub', ub); [alpha m,direc opti] = run(gs,problem); direc=direc opti*4*pi*−1; Rx(i)=phi0; max D nobit(i)=direc; Appendix A MATLAB Code 115 end save(['H:\MATLAB\Linear Antenna Array\Directivity\Variables\', 'M' num2str(M) ' q' num2str(q*10)],'Rx','max D nobit') plot(Rx,max D nobit) % Plot for Directivity hold on A.4.3 Directivity Linear Nobit optim.m %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%% function to optimise %%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% function direc= Directivity Linear Nobit optim(alpha m,M,q,phi0 r, theta0) AF=@(phi,theta) 0; for m=1:M x=@(phi,theta)exp(1j*(2*pi*(m−1)*q*sin(theta).*cos(phi)+ alpha m(m))); AF=@(phi,theta) AF(phi,theta)+x(phi,theta); end y=@(phi,theta) abs(AF(phi,theta)).ˆ2.*sin(theta); den dir=integral2(y,0,2*pi,0,pi); m=0:M−1; direc=−1*abs(sum(exp(1j*alpha m).*exp(1j*(2*pi*m*q *sin(theta0)*cos(phi0 r))))) *abs(sum(exp(1j*alpha m).*exp(1j*(2*pi*m*q *sin(theta0)*cos(phi0 r)))))/den dir; References [1] E Telatar, “Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels,” European Trans Telecommun., vol 10, no 6, pp 585–595, Nov-Dec 1999 [2] G J Foschini, “Layered space-time architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas,” Bell Labs Tech J., vol 1, no 2, pp 41–59, Autumn 1996 [3] G J Foschini and M J Gans, “On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas,” Wireless Pers Commun., vol 6, no 3, pp 311–335, Mar 1998 [4] A Sendonaris, E Erkip and B Aazhang, “User cooperation diversity Part I System description,” IEEE Trans Commun., vol 51, no 11, pp 1927–1938, Nov 2003 [5] A Minturn, D Vernekar, Y L Yang and H Sharif, “Distributed beamforming with imperfect phase synchronization for cognitive radio networks,” in IEEE Int Conf Commun., Budapest, Hungary, 2013, pp 4936–4940 [6] D H Nguyen, H H Nguyen and T T Pham, “Distributed beamforming in multiuser multi-relay networks with guaranteed QoS,” in IEEE Global Telecommun Conf., Honolulu, HI, 2009, pp 1–6 118 References [7] M Zaeri-Amirani, S Shahbazpanahi, T Mirfakhraie and K Ozdemir, “Performance tradeoffs in amplify-and-forward bidirectional network beamforming,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 60, no 8, pp 4196–4209, Aug 2012 [8] C Jeong, D.-H Kim and H.-M Kim, “Optimal power allocation for hybrid distributed beamforming in wireless relay networks,” in Fall IEEE 70th Veh Technol Conf., Anchorage, AK, 2009, pp 1–5 [9] V Havary-Nassab, S Shahbazpanahi, A Grami and Z.-Q Luo, “Distributed beamforming for relay networks based on second-order statistics of the channel state information,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 56, no 9, pp 4306– 4316, Sep 2008 [10] V Havary-Nassab, S Shahbazpanahi and A Grami, “Optimal distributed beamforming for two-way relay networks,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 58, no 3, pp 1238–1250, Mar 2010 [11] S ShahbazPanahi and M Dong, “Achievable rate region under joint distributed beamforming and power allocation for two-way relay networks,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 11, no 11, pp 4026–4037, Nov 2012 [12] Y.-w Liang and R Schober, “Cooperative amplify-and-forward beamforming with multiple multi-antenna relays,” IEEE Trans Commun., vol 59, no 9, pp 2605–2615, Sep 2011 [13] Z Ding, W H Chin and K K Leung, “Distributed beamforming and power allocation for cooperative networks,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 7, no 5, pp 1817–1822, May 2008 [14] G Zheng, K.-K Wong, A Paulraj, and B Ottersten, “Collaborative-relay beamforming with perfect CSI: optimum and distributed implementation,” IEEE Signal Process Lett., vol 16, no 4, pp 257–260, Apr 2009 References 119 [15] D H Nguyen and H H Nguyen, “SNR maximization and distributed beamforming in multiuser multi-relay networks,” in IEEE Global Telecommun Conf., Honolulu, HI, 2009, pp 1–6 [16] S Fazeli-Dehkordy, S Gazor and S Shahbazpanahi, “Distributed peer-topeer multiplexing using ad hoc relay networks,” in Int Conf Acoust., Speech and Signal Process., Las Vegas, NV, 2008, pp 2373–2376 [17] I Thibault, A Faridi, G E Corazza, A Vanelli-Coralli and A Lozano, “Design and analysis of deterministic distributed beamforming algorithms in the presence of noise,” IEEE Trans Commun., vol 61, no 4, pp 1595– 1607, Apr 2013 [18] R Vahidnia and S Shahbazpanahi, “Asynchronous bidirectional relayassisted communications,” in IEEE Int Conf Acoust., Speech and Signal Process., Kyoto, Japan, 2012, pp 2693–2696 [19] R Vahidnia and S Shahbazpanahi, “Distributed beamforming and subcarrier power allocation for OFDM-based asynchronous two-way relay networks,” in IEEE Int Conf Commun., Ottawa, ON, 2012, pp 4122–4126 [20] R Vahidnia and S ShabazPanahi, “Decentralized beamforming for multicarrier asynchronous bi-directional relaying networks,” in IEEE Int Conf Acoust., Speech and Signal Process., Vancouver, BC, 2013, pp 4202–4206 [21] J Zhang, F Roemer and M Haardt, “Distributed beamforming for two-way relaying networks with individual power constraints,” in Conf Rec 46th Asilomar Conf Signals, Syst and Comput., Pacific Grove, CA, 2012, pp 542–546 [22] V Havary-Nassab, S Shahbazpanahi and A Grami, “Optimal network beamforming for bi-directional relay networks,” in IEEE Int Conf Acoust., Speech and Signal Process., Taipei, Taiwan, 2009, pp 2277–2280 120 References [23] Y Jing and H Jafarkhani, “Network beamforming using relays with perfect channel information,” IEEE Trans Inf Theory, vol 55, no 6, pp 2499– 2517, Jun 2009 [24] S Fazeli-Dehkordy, S Shahbazpanahi and S Gazor, “Multiple peer-to-peer communications using a network of relays,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 57, no 8, pp 3053–3062, Aug 2009 [25] D Zheng, J Liu, H Chen, and H Xu, “Optimization for outage probability constrained robust downlink collaborative beamforming,” in Veh Technol Conf 75th, Yokohama, Japan, May 2012, pp 1–5 [26] D Ponukumati, F Gao, and C Xing, “Robust peer-to-peer relay beamforming: A probabilistic approach,” IEEE Commun Lett., vol 17, no 2, pp 305–308, Feb 2013 [27] B Mahboobi, M Ardebilipour, A Kalantari and E Soleimani-Nasab, “Robust cooperative relay beamforming,” IEEE Wireless Commun Lett., vol 2, no 4, pp 399–402, Aug 2013 [28] J Li and A P Petropulu, “A low complexity algorithm for collaborativerelay beamforming,” in IEEE Int Conf Acoust., Speech and Signal Process., Vancouver, BC, 2013, pp 5002–5005 [29] X Chen, Z Wang, and J Wang, “Distributed beamforming algorithms for non-regenerative MIMO relay networks,” in 5th IET Int Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Beijing, China, 2013, pp 172–176 [30] B K Chalise and L Vandendorpe, “Optimization of MIMO relays for multipoint-to-multipoint communications: Nonrobust and robust designs,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 58, no 12, pp 6355–6368, Dec 2010 References 121 [31] V Havary-Nassab, S Shahbazpanahi and A Grami, “Joint receive-transmit beamforming for multi-antenna relaying schemes,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 58, no 9, pp 4966–4972, Sep 2010 [32] H Wan and W Chen, “Coordinated beamforming for wireless multicast cell with nonregenerative multi-antenna relay,” in IEEE Int Conf Commun., Budapest, Hungary, 2013, pp 4603–4607 [33] L C Godara, “Application of antenna arrays to mobile communications II Beam-forming and direction-of-arrival considerations,” IEEE Proc., vol 85, no 8, pp.1195–1245, Aug 1997 [34] Y Yang, H Hu, J Xu and G Mao, “Relay technologies for WiMAX and LTE-advanced mobile systems,” IEEE Commun Mag., vol 47, no 10, pp 100–105, Oct 2009 [35] J N Laneman, D N Tse and G W Wornell, “Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior,” IEEE Trans Inf Theory, vol 50, no 12, pp 3062–3080, Dec 2004 [36] G Kramer, M Gastpar and P Gupta, “Cooperative strategies and capacity theorems for relay networks,” IEEE Trans Inf Theory, vol 51, no 9, pp 3037–3063, Sep 2005 [37] R C Hansen, “Special issue on active and adaptive antennas,” IEEE Trans Antennas Propag., vol 12, no 2, pp 140–141, Mar 1964 [38] H Cox, R M Zeskind and M H Owen, “Robust adaptive beamforming,” IEEE Trans Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., vol 35, no 10, pp 1365–1376, Oct 1987 [39] C.A.Balanis, Antenna Theory : Analysis and design, 3rd ed John Wiley and Sons, Hobeken, NJ., 2005 New York: 122 References [40] R.C.Hansen, Phased Array Antennas, 2nd ed New York: John Wiley and Sons, Hobeken, NJ., 2009 [41] Y.U.Kim, “Peak directivity optimization under side lobe level constraints in antenna arrays,” Electromagnetics, vol 8, no 1, pp 51–70, 1988 [42] Z Zhang, K C The and K H Li, “Semidefinite relaxation based beamforming in clustered cooperative multicell MISO systems,” in IEEE Int Conf Commun., Budapest, Hungary, 2013, pp 5635–5639 [43] C.-C Chien, H.-J Su, and H.-J Li, “Joint beamforming and power allocation for MIMO relay broadcast channel with individual SINR constraints,” IEEE Trans Veh Technol., vol 63, no 4, pp 1660–1677, May 2014 [44] O Oyman and A Paulraj, “Leverages of distributed MIMO relaying: A shannon-theoretic perspective,” in IEEE Workshop Wireless Mesh Networks, Santa Clara, CA, 2005, pp 117–126 [45] O Oyman and A Paulraj, “Design and analysis of linear distributed MIMO relaying algorithms,” IEE Proc Commun., vol 153, no 4, pp 565–572, Aug 2006 [46] ——, “Power-bandwidth tradeoff in dense multi-antenna relay networks,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 6, no 6, pp 2282–2293, Jun 2007 [47] M T Ivrlac and J A Nossek, “High-efficiency super-gain antenna arrays,” in Proc ITG Int Workshop Smart Antennas, Bremen, Germany, 2010, pp 369–374 [48] H J Chaloupka, X Wang, and J Coetzee, “Performance enhancement of smart antennas with reduced element spacing,” in IEEE Wireless Commun and Networking Conf., vol New Orleans, LA, 2003, pp 425–430 References 123 [49] R Vescovo, “Array factor synthesis for circular antenna arrays,” in IEEE Antennas Propagation Soc Int Symp Dig., Ann Arbor, MI, 1993, pp 1574–1577 [50] E P de Freitas, J P C L da Costa, A L F de Almeida and M Marinho, “Applying MIMO techniques to minimize energy consumption for long distances communications in wireless sensor networks,” in Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networking, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp 379–390 [51] M A M Marinho, E P de Freitas, J P C L da Costa, A L F de Almeida and R T de Sousa Jr., “Using cooperative MIMO techniques and UAV relay networks to support connectivity in sparse wireless sensor networks,” in Int Conf Computing, Management and Telecommunications, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2013, pp 49–54 [52] M A M Marinho,, E P de Freitas, J P C L da Costa and R T de Sousa Jr., “Synchronization for cooperative MIMO in wireless sensor networks” in Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networking, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp 298–311 [53] M A M Marinho, E P de Freitas, J P C L da Costa and R T de Sousa Jr., “Applying cooperative MIMO techniques in an adaptive routing mechanism for wireless sensor networks,” in IEEE Conf Wireless Sensors, Kuching, Malaysia, 2013, pp 47–53 [54] M M Albanny, J Coetzee and D Jayalath, “Array of subarrays using adaptive element patterns,” in Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf Proc., Seoul, Korea, 2013, pp 423–425 [55] R S Adve and T K Sarkar, “Compensation for the effects of mutual coupling on direct data domain adaptive algorithms,” IEEE Tran Antennas and Propag., vol 48, no 1, pp 86–94, Jan 2000 124 References [56] K R Dandekar, H Ling, and G Xu, “Experimental study of mutual coupling compensation in smart antenna applications,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 1, no 3, pp 480–487, Jul 2002 [57] D Tse and P Viswanath, Fundamentals of wireless communication Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ Press, 2005 [58] S Shahbazpanahi, A B Gershman, Z.-Q Luo, and K M Wong, “Robust adaptive beamforming for general-rank signal models,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 51, no 9, pp 2257–2269, Sep 2003 ... number of antennas in an array 37 3.12 Antenna architectures (a) single antenna, (b) MIMO terminal, (c) Cooperative MIMO terminals and (d) smart antenna consisting of a power splitter/combiner... achieved with the smart antenna system and compared it to the single antenna relays case with distributed beamforming Results show that the total power gain which exceeds the sum of the smart antenna. .. SNR threshold for single and multiple antenna networks with different αg for M = 3, q = 0.4 with 3-bit phase shifter in single antenna relay network and multi -antenna relay network for αf = −5

Ngày đăng: 07/08/2017, 15:39

Mục lục

  • 1.6 Scope of the Proposed Project

  • 1.7 Organisation of the Thesis

  • 2.4 Minimum Power and Maximum SNR

  • 2.5 Gaps in the Existing Literature

  • 3.5 Array Factor

    • 3.5.1 Array Factor of Linear and Circular Antenna Arrays

    • 3.6 Antenna Arrays

      • 3.6.1 Antenna Architectures of Communication Terminals

      • 4.1.2 Directivity Maximisation

        • 4.1.2.1 With Digital Phase Shifters

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan