Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 450 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
450
Dung lượng
8,52 MB
Nội dung
Agency Theory: AnExtendedConceptualisationand Reformulation Nurcan Temel Candemir School of International Business Principal Supervisor: Dr Mark McGovern Associate Supervisor: Prof Roger Willett Bachelor of Business (International Business/Accountancy/Japanese) Bachelor of Business (Honours) (International Business/Accountancy) Doctor of Philosophy (International Business) 14 November 2005 Acknowledgments Acknowledgments The completion of this Dissertation would not have been possible without the assistance and dedication of special people I wish to express my sincere gratitude firstly to my principal supervisor Dr Mark McGovern, and also my external supervisor Prof Stephen Hill and my associate supervisor Prof Roger Willett for their enthusiasm, dedication and understanding throughout the course Their encouragement, guidance and assistance were greatly appreciated I wish to also thank all the relevant School of International Business Staff who assisted in the adminstrative tasks of writing this Dissertation I wish to also express my sincere gratitude to my husband Dr Oben Candemir for his continual support and assistance throughout the writing of this Dissertation I am indebted to him for his assistance in locating suitable software for the simulation developed Thank-you Oben for your insightful comments, encouragement and emotional support Finally, I would like to sincerely thank my family as a whole My father, mother and brother whose patience and assistance during hectic times have been greatly appreaciated My son Onur, who arrived in my life during the writing of this PhD has been an continuing inspiration in completing this Dissertation Without their encouragement this Dissertation would not of been possible To all of the above people, I acknowledge and thank you sincerely for all the assistance and support that you have given me Without you, this research would not have been possible i Statement of Original Authorship Statement of Original Authorship The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree or diploma at any other higher education institution To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made Signed Date ii Abstract Abstract The theory of Agency, specifically that developed by Jesen and Meckling (1976), will be the subject of examination Agencytheory has been the subject of extensive research since its introduction in modern form by Jensen and Meckling (1976) The generality of the theory of Agency appears unquestionable and it has been widely adopted Surprisingly, however, the model correctly predicts particular phenomena under investigation in only the simplest of instances, and even in the simplest of instances there are cases where the simple agency model has limited success Possible reasons for this failure may lie in the assumed universalist foundation and in the common formulation regarding agent behaviour, that all agents are self-interested rationalists seeking to maximise their own utility to the disregard of their principal’s interest While the hypothesis of self-interested rationalism may be apt in some contexts it may be misleading or inadequate in others This is especially so when the narrow interpretations of self-interested rationalism are used Human beings are more complex in their totality than can be represented in any parsimonious model This is particularly a problem when model predictions are not empirically supported Aspects omitted in a model may be a source of the misfit between prediction and observation Anextendedconceptualisationand reformulation of agent behaviour is presented An approach is developed that addresses the context of agent behaviour, the socioenvironment within which the agent interacts The context particularly refers to the institutional affiliations and interactions that influence agent behaviour through their belief structure (i.e., their Belief-Desire-Intention, BDI, model of rational action) Through the use of an institutional framework contextual analysis is incorporated into the theory of agencyand ultimately agent behaviour This agent is termed a socioenvironmental rationalist agent (SERA) which is contrasted with the self-interested rationalist (SIR) agent in the existing agency literature iii Abstract This research utilises an object-oriented approach to develop a simulation of the extendedconceptualisationand reformulation of agent behaviour Simulations investigate agent behaviours and outcomes at the micro (specifically through individualised SERA and SIR formulations) and macro (specifically through a multiagent SERA community formulation in the context of the EU financial accounting harmonisation process) levels Netlogo is the simulation tool through which this is attained The simulation demonstrates how alternative formulations of rationality lead to different outcomes and these differences are evident at both levels Importantly the extended model has outputs that are more in tune with current empirical evidence The analysis thus demonstrates the plausibility of the extendedconceptualisationand reformulation and the need to incorporate the context of behaviour more fully within the analysis of the principal-agent relationship Through this extended examination of agent behaviour further theoretical and practical insights regarding the understanding of agent behaviour, the principal-agent problem and relationship, multi-agent communities, and of business and society in general may be attained This dissertation provides one step in advancing our fundamental understanding of the principal-agent problem The scope and power of agency analysis can be substantially extended using the approach and methods outlined, particularly beyond that present in existing Agency research iv Table of Contents Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………… ……… I STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP………………………………… … …… II ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………….………….III LIST OF FIGURES……… ……………………………………………………….… X LIST OF TABLES.………………………………………………………………… XIII INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 BACKGROUND TO THE AGENT RELATIONSHIPS ANDAGENCYTHEORY RESEARCH PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RESEARCH RESEARCH APPROACH AND QUESTION METHODOLOGY OUTLINE OF DISSERTATION 10 CONCLUSION 13 LITERATURE REVIEW – A REVIEW OF AGENCYTHEORY 15 2.1 THE THEORY OF THE FIRM: WHY THEY EXIST 15 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.2 The Firm: The Theoretical Approaches 17 Decision Rights, Alienability and the Conflict of Interest 19 Theory of Agencyand Transaction Cost Theory (TCT) 22 AGENCY THEORY: A DESCRIPTION 24 2.2.1 A Description of Principal Agent Problems andAgency 24 2.2.2 Specific Formulations of the Principal Agent Model 26 2.2.3 An Example of a Specific Formulation of Agency 31 2.2.4 Characteristics of the Specification 35 2.2.4.1 Information Asymmetry and Conflicting Interests 35 2.2.4.2 Agency Problems 37 2.2.5 Summary 38 2.3 EXISTING RESEARCH IN THE THEORY OF AGENCY 39 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 2.4 2.5 2.6 The Theoretical Approaches to Agency 40 Extension and Application of the Simple Principal-Agent Model 41 Self Interest: The Underlying Proposition of Agency 45 Self-Interest and Management Compensation 47 Critique of Self-Interest & the Use of Management Compensation 49 PROBLEMS TO BE ADDRESSED 51 Initial Formulation: the Interplay of Institutions 52 CONCLUSION 60 v Table of Contents ANEXTENDEDCONCEPTUALISATION OF AGENT BEHAVIOUR 65 3.1 3.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY 66 THE NOTIONS OF RATIONALITY 69 3.2.1 TYPES AND USES OF RATIONALITY 69 3.2.2 Research Examining the Notions of Rationality .71 3.3 RATIONAL MODELS WITHIN AGENCY 74 3.3.1 RATIONAL MODELS WITHIN AGENCY 74 3.3.2 Lash’s (1999) States of Modernity 75 3.3.3 Constructivism and Rationality .77 3.3.4 Influential Factors 79 3.4 SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL RATIONALITY: THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 80 3.5 Institutional Analysis of Behavioural Influence 83 3.6 Comparative Agent Framework and Properties .87 3.7 CONCLUSION 90 THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) – A CASE OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING HARMONISATION 91 4.1 THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 91 4.1.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) A CONTEXT FOR AGENCY 94 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING HARMONISATION IN THE EU 98 NATIONAL RESPONSES TOWARDS EU FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING HARMONISATION 101 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.5 Perceptions of the ‘True and Fair View’ .102 Directive Diversity .106 NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS 108 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.5.3 4.5.4 4.5.5 4.6 History of EU Financial Accounting Regulation and Harmonisation .92 Institutional Analysis and the United Kingdom .110 Institutional Analysis and the Netherlands 113 Institutional Analysis and Germany 115 Institutional Analysis and France 118 Findings from the Institutional Analysis 121 CONCLUSION 123 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND THE OBJECT ORIENTATED (OO) APPROACH 125 5.1 DESIGN OF THE RESEARCH 125 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.2 OBJECT-ORIENTED (OO) METHODOLOGY/APPROACH 130 5.2.1 5.2.2 5.3 Components of a OO Methodology 130 Model Construction 132 SIMULATION 135 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.4 Organisation of the Research .126 Methodology and Requirements 129 Simulation of Agency 135 Artificial Intelligence (AI) .138 METHOD OF ANALYSIS: QUALITATIVE CASE RESEARCH 141 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 Case Methods 141 Validity of Simulation and Case Research 143 The Case Research Process .146 vi Table of Contents 5.4.4 5.5 5.6 Case Selection 148 LIMITATIONS OF METHODOLOGY 149 CONCLUSION 152 FORMULATING THE AGENT 153 6.1 6.2 AGENT DESIGN 153 A BELIEF-DESIRE-INTENTION (BDI) MODEL OF RATIONAL ACTION 156 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5 6.2.6 6.3 6.4 APPLYING BDI TO A SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL RATIONALIST AGENT (SERA) FRAMEWORK 169 CASES APPLYING THE SERA FRAMEWORK 171 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.5 Mutual Interests and Multi-Agent Communities 179 Multi-Agents & the SERA Framework 179 FORMULATING AN EXAMPLE OF A SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL RATIONAL MULTIAGENT COMMUNITY (SERC) 183 6.6.1 6.6.2 6.7 Four Cases Describing the SERA Framework 173 Conclusions to Case Formulations 177 SERA AND COLLECTIVE MENTAL STATES 178 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.6 The Theory of Practical Reasoning 156 Practical Reasoning, Statism and Environmental Dynamism 159 Environmental Reconsideration 162 Consideration of Time 164 BDI Components and Application to Current Research 166 Summary 168 Describing the EU Case: An Example of a SERC 184 Summary 190 DEVELOPING THE WORKINGS OF THE FRAMEWORK AND CASES 192 6.7.1 From Abstract Specification to Concrete Model 192 6.7.2 REFINEMENT AND SPECIFICATION OF THE SERA COMPUTATIONAL MODEL (SIMULATION ONE) 194 6.7.3 REFINEMENT AND SPECIFICATION OF THE SERC (SIMULATION TWO) 198 6.8 INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS AND SIMULATION 201 6.8.1 6.8.2 6.8.3 6.9 Information Requirements and Simulation for SERA 201 Simulating SERA and SIR 204 SERC Information Requirements and Simulation 206 CONCLUSION 211 vii Table of Contents SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL RATIONALIST AGENT: ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION 213 7.1 MODELLING AGENTS AND SIMULATION USING NETLOGO 213 7.1.1 7.1.2 7.2 7.3 DEMONSTRATION OF SIMULATION ONE 219 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS FOR SIMULATION ONE 227 7.3.1 7.3.2 7.4 Simulations in NetLogo 213 Requirements and Attributes of NetLogo .215 SIMULATION AND OUTPUT .227 VISUAL ANALYSIS: THE PROCESS 227 VISUAL ANALYSIS: THE RESULTS 228 7.4.1 SERA OUTPUTS AND PRESENTATION 228 7.4.2 Visual Analysis of the Socio-Environmental Rationalist Agent Contour 232 7.5.1.1 First Division Analysis: ‘Atomistic Society’ 233 7.5.1.2 Second Division Analysis: ‘Controlled Society’ 234 7.5.1.3 Third Division Analysis: ‘Upheaval in Society’ 235 7.5.1.4 Fourth Division Analysis: ‘Reforming Society’ 236 7.5.1.5 Summary of the Visual Analysis 237 7.4.3 Visual Analysis of the Self-Interested Rationalist Agent Contour .238 7.4.4 Visual Analysis of the Socio-Environmental Rationalist Agent and Self-Interested Rationalist Agent Contours 240 7.5 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: THE PROCESS AND RESULTS 242 7.5.1 7.5.2 7.6 7.7 Descriptives and Variance Analysis .242 Correlation Analysis .245 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IN RELATION TO THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 247 CONCLUSION 251 EUROPEAN UNION (EU) CASE SIMULATION & ANALYSIS 253 8.1 8.2 DEMONSTRATION OF SIMULATION TWO 253 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS FOR SIMULATION TWO 262 8.2.1 8.2.2 8.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5 8.2.6 8.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: THE RESULTS 286 8.3.1 8.3.2 8.4 8.5 Visual Analysis: The Results 263 Visualisation and Analysis of the Anglo-Saxon Agent Group .266 Visualisation and Analysis of the Germanic Agent Group 270 Visualisation and Analysis of the Latin Agent Group 275 Visualisation and Analysis of the Nordic Agent Group 279 Visualisation Summary .284 Descriptives and Variance Analysis .287 Correlation Analysis .296 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IN RELATION TO THE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND QUESTIONS 299 CONCLUSION 302 viii Table of Contents CONCLUSIONS 303 9.1 THE STUDY IN REVIEW 303 9.2 RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS 306 9.2.1 IMPLICATIONS FOR AGENCYTHEORY 307 9.2.2 9.2.3 9.2.4 9.3 AREAS OF ADVANCEMENT AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 322 9.3.1 9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.4 9.3.5 9.4 9.5 9.6 Agency Theory, its Limitations and Research Question 323 Agent Behaviour, its Context and Research Questions and 324 Agency Theory, its Application and Research Question 325 Alternative Methods of Agency Research and Research Question 326 Implications of Applying the Socio-Environmental Rationalist Agent (SERA) and Research Question 327 LIMITATIONS 329 CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE RESEARCH 330 FUTURE RESEARCH POSSIBILITIES 333 9.6.1 9.6.2 9.7 Implications for Harmonisation in EU Financial Accounting 312 Implications, for the Wider Business Community and Society 317 Summary 322 Research in Relation to the Theory of Agency 333 Research in Relation to the Implications of the ExtendedConceptualisationand Reformulation of Agent Behaviour 334 CONCLUSION 336 APPENDIX 337 APPENDIX 343 APPENDIX 357 APPENDIX 381 REFERENCES 399 ix References Newman, M E J (2003) ‘The structure and function of complex networks’, SIAM Review, Vol 45, pp 167-256 Nobes, C W (1993) ‘The true and fair view requirement: impact on the Fourth Directive’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol 24, No 93, pp 35 - 48 Nobes, C W (2000) GAAP 2000 – A Survey of National Accounting Rules in 53 Countries, PricewaterHouseCoopers: Reading, pp 1-125 Nohria, N (1992) ‘Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations?’ in N Nohria and R.G Eccles (eds.) Networks and Organizations, Boston: Harvard University Press Nohia, N and Eccles, R G (eds.) (1992) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press North, D C (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance New York: Cambridge University Press North, D C (1997) ‘Where have we Been and Where are we Going?’, Working Paper, Washington University, pp 1-19 Odell, J (2000) ‘Object and Agents: How Do They Differ?’, JOOP, October, pp 5053 Oh, U F (2000) ‘International Joint Ventures: A Common Agency Problem’, Global Business and Economics Review, Vol 2, No 1, pp 67-84 Oi, J C (1999) Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform, Berkeley: University of California Press 427 References Oliver, C (1991) ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 16, pp 145-169 Oliver, C (1992) ‘The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization’, Organization Studies, Vol 13, No 4, pp 563-588 Ortin-Angel, P and Salas-Fumas, V (1998) ‘Agency-Theory and Internal-LaborMarket Explanations of Bonus Payments: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Firms’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol 7, No 4, Winter, pp 573-613 Osborne, E (2001) ‘Culture, Development, and Government: Reservations in India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol 49, No 3, Apr, pp 659-685 Oyer, P (2000) ‘Why Firms Use Incentives that have no Incentive Effects’, Working Paper, July, Stanford University, pp 1-29 Pages-Jones, M and Weiss, S (1998) ‘OO Synthesis: an Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Method’, Conceptual Modelling – ER 98: 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling Singapore, November 16-19, pp 64-67 Palenzuela, V A and Bobillo, A M (1999) ‘Transaction Costs and Bargaining Power: Entry Mode Choice in Foreign Markets’, Multinational Business Review, Vol 7, No 1, Spring, pp 62-75 Parker, R H (1998) in Nobes, C W and Parker, R H (1998) ‘Financial Reporting in the United Kingdom’, Comparative International Accounting, 5th Edition, London: Prentice Hall Europe Parks, J M and Conlon, E J (1995) ‘Compensation Contracts: Do AgencyTheory Assumptions Predict Negotiated Agreements?’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, January, pp 821-839 428 References Pastor, O., Pelechano, V Insfran, E and Gomez, J (1998) ‘From Object Oriented Conceptual Modelling to Automated Programming in Java’, Conceptual Modelling – ER 98: 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling Singapore, November 16-19, pp 183-196 Path, K (2001) ‘Unusual Calms Tell of Coming Storms’, TRN News, No 22/29, August, pp 1-2 Patton, M Q (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edition, London: Sage Publications Pawson, R & Tilley, N (1997) Realistic Evaluation, Thousand Oaks: Sage Pearce, D and Stacchetti, E (1988) ‘The Interaction of Implicit and Explicit Contracts in Repeated Agency’, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No 892, Yale University, pp 1-29 Perry, C (1998) ‘Processes of a Case Study Methodology for Postgraduate Research in Marketing’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol 32, No 9/10, pp 785-802 Perry, C., Riege, A and Brown, L (1999) ‘Realism’s Role Among Scientific Paradigms in Marketing Research’, Irish Marketing Review, Vol 12, No 2, pp 1623 Pessali, H F and Fernandez, R G (1999) ‘Institutional Economics at Micro Level? What Transaction Costs Theory could Learn form Original Institutionalism (in the Spirit of Building Bridges)’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol 33, No 2, June, pp 265-275 Phillips, E M and Pugh, D S (1987) How to get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and their Supervisors, 3rd Edition, Philadelphia: Open University Press 429 References Pollack, M E (1992) ‘The Uses of Plans’, Artificial Intelligence, Vol 57, No 1, pp 43–69 Pontes, M C (1995) ‘Agency Theory: a Framework for Analyzing Physician Services’, Health Care Management Review, Vol 20, September, pp 57-69 Pottier, S W and Sommer, D W (1997) ‘Agency Theoryand Life Insurer Ownership Structure’, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol 64, No 3, Sep, pp 529550 Powell, W W (1991) ‘Expanding the scope of institutional analysis’, The new Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Price, R and Reus-Smit, C (1998), 'Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theoryand Constructivism', European Journal of International Relations, Vol 4, No 3, pp 259-294 Puxty, A G et al (1987) ‘Modes of regulation in advanced capitalism; locating accountancy in four countries’, Accounting, Organizations and Business, Vol 12, No 3, pp 273 - 291 Radebaugh, L H and Gray, S J (1997) International Accounting and Multinational Enterprise, 4th edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Randhir, T O and Lee, J G (1996) ‘Managing Local Commons in Developing Economies: An Institutional Approach’, Ecological Economics, Vol 16, pp 1-12 Rao, A S and Georgeff, M P (1996) ‘Decision procedures of BDI logics’, Journal of Logic and Computation, Vol 8, No 3, pp 293–344 430 References Ray, P K (2002) ‘The Institutional Context and Effectiveness of Transnational Corporations in Developing Economies: Some Conceptual Issues’, Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Conference of Australia-New Zealand International Business Academy, November: pp 347-362 Reeves, N and Kelly-Holmes, H (1997) The European Business Environment, London: International Thomson Business Press Reichelstein, S (1992) ‘Constructing Incentive Schemes for Government Contracts: An Application of Agency Theory’, Accounting Review, Vol 67, No 4, pp 712-735 Reilly, W S N (1997) ‘A Methodology for Building Believable Social Agents’, Proceeding s of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Feb 5-8, pp 114-121 Reisman, A., Kumar, A and Motwani, J (1998) ‘A Meta Review of the Game Theory Publications in the Flagship US based Journals’, Working Paper, No 98022, November, University of Michigan Rezaee, Z (1991) ‘The impact of new accounting rules on the consolidated financial statements of Multinational Companies’, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol 26, pp 206 - 219 Ridley, M (1996) The Origins of Virtue, London: Viking, Penquin Books Roberts, C B., Salter, S B and Kantor, J (1996) ‘The IASC comparability project and current financial reporting reality: an empirical study of reporting in Europe’, British Accounting Review, Vol 28, pp - 22 Rodrik, D (2000) ‘Institutions for High-quality Growth: What they are and how to acquire them’, Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol 35, No 3, Fall, pp 3-31 431 References Romano, P and Merelli, E (2002) ‘NETTAB 2002 Workshop on Agents in Bioinformatics’, Agent Link News, No 11, December, pp 19-20 Rorty, R (1980) Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Rose, P S (1992) ‘Agency Theoryand Entry Barriers in Banking’, Financial Review, Vol 27, No 3, Aug, pp 323-353 Rosen, S (1987) ‘Transaction Costs and Internal Labor Markets’, NBER Working Paper Series, No 2407, October, Cambridge, pp 1-26 Roth, K and O’Donnell, S (1996) ‘Foreign Subsidiary Compensating Strategy: AnAgencyTheory Prespective’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 39, pp 678-704 Roumasset, J and Uy, M (1986) ‘Agency Costs and the Agricultural Firm’, Land Economics, No 501, pp 290-302 Rubio, S (1994) ‘Curing the Canon’, Bad Subjects, No 11, Feb, pp 1-6 Ruggie, J G (1998) ‘What makes the world Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constractivist Challenge’ International Organisation, Vol 52, No Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., and Lorensen, W (1991) ObjectOriented Modelling and Design, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc Scheid, J and Walton, P in Alexander, D and Archer, S (ed.) (1998) The European Accounting Guide, 3rd edition, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Professional Publishing Schild, K (1999) ‘On the relationship between BDI logics and standard logics of concurrency’, In J P M¨uller, M P Singh, and A S Rao (eds.), Intelligent Agents V — Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-98), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 432 References Schuette, R and Rotthowe, T (1998) ‘The Guidelines of Modelling – An Approach to Enhance the Quality in Information Models’, Conceptual Modelling – ER 98: 17th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling Singapore, November 16-19, pp 240-254 Scott, W R (1995) Institutions and organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage Scott, R W (1987) Organizations: rational, natural and open systems, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Sebenius, J K (2002) ‘The Hidden Challenge of Cross-Border Negotiations’, Harvard Business Review, March, pp 76-85 Seckler, G in Alexander, D and Archer, S (ed.) (1998) The European Accounting Guide, 3rd edition, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Professional Publishing Selltiz, C et al (1959) Research Methods in Social Relations New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Setterfield, M (1993) ‘A Model of Institutional HYstersis’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol 28, No 3, pp 755-774 Shapira, Z (2000) ‘Governance in Organizations: A Cognitive Perspective’, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol 4, pp 53-67 Shlaer, S and Mellor, S J (1992) Object Lifecycles: Modelling the World in States, New Jersey: Yourdon Press Shoham, Y and Tennenholtz, M (1995) ‘On Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies: Off-Line Design’, Artificial Intelligence, Vol 73, pp 231-252 433 References Shubik, M (2000) ‘Game Theory: Some Observations’, Working Paper, No 132, July, Yale School of Management, pp 1-7 Singh, J and Sirdeshmukh, D (2000) ‘Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgements’, Academy of Marketing Science, Vol 28, No 1, Winter, pp 150-167 Sitte, J (2001) ‘Autonomous Machines Principles and Technologies’, Working Paper, QUT, Oct 15, pp 1-112 Slovak, P (1990) Choice In Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Cambridge: MIT Press Smith, T A (2001) ‘Equality, Evolution and Partnership Law’, Law and Economics Research Paper, No 11, January, University of San Diego, pp 1-50 Spake, D F., D’Souza, G., Neal, T C and Morgan, R M (1999) ‘Advertising Agency Compensation: AnAgencyTheory Explanation’, Journal of Advertising, Vol 28, No 3, Fall, pp 53-72 Steensma, K H and Corley, K G (2001) ‘Organisational Context as a Moderator of Theories on Firm Boundaries for Technology Sourcing’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 44, No 2, April, pp 271-291 Stinchcombe, A L (1965) ‘Social structure and organizations’, In James G March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp 142-193 Strippgen, S (1997) ‘Insight: A Virtual Laboratory for Looking into Bheaviour-Based Autonomous Agents’, Proceeding s of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Feb 5-8, pp 474-475 434 References Stroh, L K., Brett, J M., Baumann, J P and Reilly, A H (1996) ‘Agency Theoryand Variable Pay Compensation Strategies’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 39, pp 751-768 Subramanian, A (2002) “Managerial Flexibility, Agency Costs and Optimal Capital Structure’, Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, pp 1-49 Sutton, R I (2001) ‘The Weird Rules of Creativity’, Harvard Business Review, September, pp 94-103 Tankersley, W B (2000) ‘The Impact of External Control Arrangements on Organizational Performance’, Administration & Society, Vol 32, No 3, Jul, pp 282304 Tarca, A (2001) ‘International Convergence of Accounting Practices: Choosing Between IASs and US GAAP’, Working Paper, September, University of Western Australia, pp 1-34 Tarrow, S (2001) ‘Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics’, Annual Review Political Science, Vol 4, pp 1-20 Temel, N (2000) Cultural Relativism, the Barrier to Harmonised EU Financial Accounting: the Potential Implications for Business Development and the EU Capital Market, Queensland University of Technology: unpublished Tesfatsion, L (2005) ‘Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory’, in Kenneth L Judd and Leigh Tesfatsion (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics: Volume 2, Agent-Based Computational Economics, North-Holland: Handbooks in Economics Series 435 References Ticehurst, G W and Veal, A J (1999) Business Research Methods: A Managerial Approach, Malaysia: Wisely Longman Australia Pty Limited Tilly, C (2001) ‘Mechanisms in Political Process’, Annual Review Political Science, Vol 4, pp 21-41 Tilman, R (2001) ‘Institutional Economics, Instrumentalist Political Theory, and the American Tradition of Empirical Collectivism’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol 25, No 1, March, pp 117-132 Togati, T D (2001) ‘Keynes as the Einstein of Economic Theory’, History of Political Economy, Vol 33, No 1, Spring, pp 117-138 Tower, G and Kelly, M (1989) ‘The Financial Accounting Standard Setting Process: AnAgencyTheory Perspective’, Working Paper, June, Massey University, pp 1-18 Traum, D R (1997) ‘Conversational Agency: The Trains-93 Dialogue Manager’, Working Paper, University of Geneva, pp 1-11 Tsoukas, H (1989) ‘The validity of idiographic research explanations’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 14, pp 551-561 Tung, F (2001) ‘Skepticism about Universalism: International Bankruptcy and International Relations’, U C Berkeley law and Economics Working Paper Series, No 7, pp 1-61 Van der Hoek, W and Wooldridge, M (2003) ‘Towards a Logic of Rational Agency’, Logic Journal of the IGPL, Vol 11, No 2, March, pp 133-157 Van der Tas, L G (1998) ‘Accounting in the Netherlands’, in Walton, P., Haller, A and Raffournier, B (1998) International Accounting, London: International Thomson Business Press 436 References Van Eck, P and Wierings, R (2001) ‘E-Business and Agency: Some Research Issues’, Working Paper, University of Twente, pp 1-20 Van Osnabrugge, M (2000) ‘A Comparison of Business Angel and Venture Capitalist Investment Procedures: AnAgency Theory-Based Analysis’, Venture Capital, Vol 2, No.2, pp 91-109 Van Staveren, I (1999) ‘Chaos Theoryand Institutional Economics: Metaphor or Model?’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol 33, No 1, Mar, pp 141-167 Veblen, T (1975) The Theory of Business Enterprise, Clifton: Augutus M Kelley Venners, B (1998) ‘The Canonical Object Idiom’, Design Techniques, October, pp 1-7 Verrecchia, R E (1986) ‘Managerial Discretion in the Choice among Financial Reporting Alternatives’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 8, pp 175-195 Walton, P (1992) ‘Harmonisation of accounting in France and Britain: some evidence’, ABACUS, Vol 28, No 2, pp 186-199 Walton, P (1995) ‘Accounting in the United Kingdom’, in Walton, P (ed.) (1995) European Financial Reporting: a History, London: Academic Press Limited Walton, P (ed.) (1995) European Financial Reporting: a History, London: Academic Press Limited Walton, P (1997) ‘The true and fair view and the drafting of the Fourth Directive’, The European Accounting Review, Vol 6, No 4, pp 721-730 Walton, P., Haller, A and Raffournier, B (1998) International Accounting, London: International Thomson Business Press 437 References Wang, C (1997) ‘Incentives, CEO Compensation, and Shareholder Wealth in a Dynamic Agency Model’, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol 76, pp 72-105 Watts, R L and Zimmerman, J L (1978) ‘Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards’, The Accounting Review, January, pp 112134 Watts, R L and Zimmerman, J L (1979) ‘The Demand for and Supply of Accounting Theories: the Market for Excuses’, The Accounting Review, Vol LIV, No 2, April, pp 273-305 Watts, R L and Zimmerman, J L (1986) Positive Accounting Theory, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc Webber, B., Badler, N., Di Eugenio, B., Geib, C., Levison, L and Moore, M (1995) ‘Instructions, Intentions and Expectations’, Artificial Intelligence, Vol 73, pp 253269 Wells, R (2001) ‘How Institutional Theory Speaks to Changes in Organisational Populations’, Heath Care Management Review, Vol 26, No 2, Spring, pp 80-84 Wendt, A (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge Wessels, D W (2000) ‘Organisational Structure, Agency Theory, and Capital Allocation’, PhD Thesis, University of California, pp 1-210 Westney, E D (1993) ‘Institutional Theoryand the TNC’, In Ghoshal, S and Westney, E (eds.), Organisation Theoryand the Multinational Corporation, New York, St Martin’s Press, pp 53-76 White, R and Hanson, D (2000) ‘Rationality and Rhetoric in the Corporate World: The Corporate Annual Report as Aristotelian Ganre’, Working Paper, No 20-06, University of Tasmania, Sep, pp 1-23 438 References Whittred, G., Zimmer, I And Taylor, S (2000) Financial Accounting: Incentive Effects and Economic Consequences, 5th Edition, London: Harcourt Publishers International Wilkins, D., Myers, K., Lowrance, J and Wesley, L (1995) ‘Planning and Reacting in Uncertain and Dynamic Environments’, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Vol 7, pp 121–152 Williams, D J (1984) ‘An Exploratory Study of Shareholder Bonding in Financial Mutuals’, Working Paper, University of Sydney, pp 1- 35 Williamson, O E (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press Williamson, O E (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press Williamson, O E (1990) ‘A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol 146, pp 6171 Wolfers, J (2002) ‘Are Voters Rational? Evidence from Gubernational Elections’, Research Working Paper, No 1730, Stanford University, pp 1-20 Wooldridge, M (1996) ‘Practical Reasoning with Procedural Knowledge: A Logic of BDI Agents with Know-How’ In Gabbay, D M and Ohlbach, H J (eds), Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning Springer-Verlag, June, pp 1-16 Wooldridge, M (2000) Reasoning about Rational Agents, London: The MIT Press 439 References Wooldridge, M (2002) An Introduction to Multiagent Systems, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd Wooldridge, M and Jennings, N R (1995) ‘Intelligent agents: Theoryand Practice’, Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol 10, No Wooldridge, M and Parsons, S (1999) ‘Intention Reconsideration Reconsidered’, In Muller, J P., Singh, M and Rao, A (eds) Intelligent Agents V, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in AI, Volume 1365, March pp 1-17 Yang, Y L (1995) ‘Degree Of Supervision, Moral Hazard, and Hierarchical Control’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol 26, pp 93-105 Yin, R K (1984) Case study research: Design and methods Newbury Park, CA: Sage Yin, R (1994) Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Zucker, L G (ed.) (1988) Institutional patterns and organizations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger 440 Graduation Citation Agency Theory: AnExtendedConceptualisationand Reformulation Candidate: Nurcan Temel-Candemir Principal Supervisor: Dr Mark McGovern Associate Supervisor: Prof Roger Willett Doctor of Philosophy Graduation Citation Agencytheory relates the actions of interdependent parties, such as a company board and a CEO, or the nations and Union of Europe Traditionally, agents have been considered as limited, introspective decision makers In her dissertation Nurcan redeveloped this Agents are more comprehensively formulated The influences of external institutions are explicitly incorporated This broader view of agent behaviour is captured by her Socio-Environmental Rationalist Agent (SERA) and its workings demonstrated through computer simulations of agents, and situations in the European Union (EU) In the words of one highly respected examiner, this is “an outstanding contribution” and “a most challenging, ambitious and interesting thesis” developed with “an extremely thorough and strongly analytical approach throughout” Nurcan’s work has significant policy implications not just for governments but also for corporations Her research provides an important step in advancing our fundamental understanding of agent behaviour beyond that present in existing Agencyand international business research i ... Financial Accounting Regulation and Harmonisation .92 Institutional Analysis and the United Kingdom .110 Institutional Analysis and the Netherlands 113 Institutional Analysis and Germany... Philips and Formed and Linked Pugh 2000) Focus (after Ticehurst and Veal 2000) Pure Research (more abstract and conceptual) Explanation and critique of existing and proposed concepts and assumptions... Visual Analysis: The Results 263 Visualisation and Analysis of the Anglo-Saxon Agent Group .266 Visualisation and Analysis of the Germanic Agent Group 270 Visualisation and Analysis