Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Human Movement Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/humov Falls in young adults: Perceived causes and environmental factors assessed with a daily online survey Michel Johannes Hubertus Heijnen a, Shirley Rietdyk a,b,⇑ a b Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Center for Aging and the Life Course, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 20 August 2015 Revised 17 December 2015 Accepted 17 December 2015 Available online 29 December 2015 Keywords: Slips Trips Falls Survey Online Young adults a b s t r a c t Falls are the third leading cause of unintentional injuries for ages 18–35 years (CDC), but the causes and circumstances of falls in this age group are understudied The purpose of this study was to document the frequency and circumstances of falls in young adults with a daily online survey Ninety-four undergraduate students (19.9 ± 0.9 years) received a daily email for 16 weeks regarding slips, trips and falls in the past 24 h (93% response rate) More than half of the participants (52%) fell in the 16-week interval Injuries were reported in 16% of falls, and medical treatment was received in 4% of all falls The majority of falls occurred while walking (58%), and the main cause of the fall was a slip (48%) or trip (25%) On average, participants fell once out of every 18 perceived slips and trips Physical activity level did not distinguish fallers from non-fallers (p = 0.45), but for those who did fall, falls were more frequent as physical activity level increased (p = 0.007) The high fall and injury rate in a short interval reflects the inherent instability of bipedal locomotion and indicates that falls are not a trivial problem for young adults Ó 2015 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved Introduction Falls have been described as a major public health problem (WHO, 2012); they can lead to death, chronic pain, disability and loss of independence (Kannus, Sievanen, Palvanen, Jarvinen, & Parkkari, 2005) Circumstances of falls are described extensively in older adults (Berg, Alessio, Mills, & Tong, 1997; Robinovitch et al., 2013; Rubenstein & Josephson, 2002), but fall surveys in young and middle-aged adults are less prevalent, with one study examining the age group 20–45 years (Talbot, Musiol, Witham, & Metter, 2005), and no studies with an age range limited to adults younger than 25 years However, falls carry significant risk for both young and older adults, as falls are ranked as the third cause of accidental deaths across all ages (CDC) Further, 28% of traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases were due to falls, and 70% of individuals with TBI are children, adolescents or young adults (Rusnak, 2013) Therefore, increased knowledge is needed regarding falls in young adults Control of dynamic equilibrium in humans is challenged by a number of factors, including the large inertial load of the head, arms and trunk, a small base of support, a high center of mass, and the potential for vertical collapse due to the joints in the lower limbs Since falls in older adults occur most often during walking (Berg et al., 1997; Luukinen, Koski, Hiltunen, & Kivelä, 1994; Talbot et al., 2005), falls are typically ascribed to the inherent instability of biped locomotion combined with age-associated decrements in balance control (Chen, Ashton-Miller, Alexander, & Schultz, 1991; Lee & Chou, 2006; Muir, ⇑ Corresponding author at: Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, 800 W Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2046, USA E-mail address: srietdyk@purdue.edu (S Rietdyk) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.007 0167-9457/Ó 2015 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 87 Haddad, Heijnen, & Rietdyk, 2015; Winter, 1991; Woollacott & Shumway-Cook, 2002) However, balance control is presumably not compromised in young adults Therefore, examination of falls in this group will increase understanding of the relative contribution of bipedal instability versus compromised balance to falls We can determine if healthy adults younger than 25 years fall most often during walking, or if falls are more likely to result from challenging activities more common in young adults such as athletic activities or texting while walking Further, in older adults falls are believed to result from the interaction of environmental hazards and individual susceptibility based on subject-specific characteristics (Connell, Wolf, & Atlanta FICSIT Group, 1997; Rubenstein, 2006) Assessing the causes and circumstances of falls in young adults will allow us to determine how environmental factors, such as stairs and icy sidewalks, and individual-specific behaviors, such as physical activity level and alcohol consumption, are related to falls in young adults Falls are typically examined by asking participants to recall falls in the preceding month, preceding year, or preceding two years (e.g Talbot et al., 2005) However, fall memory is known to be problematic (Ganz, Higashi, & Rubenstein, 2005; Peel, 2000), and shorter time intervals (e.g Berg et al., 1997; Rubenstein & Josephson, 2002) improve accuracy of fall data (Cummings, Nevitt, & Kidd, 1988; Ganz et al., 2005; Hill, Schwarz, Flicker, & Carroll, 1999; Peel, 2000) Therefore, a quick daily assessment of falls may be ideal to record frequency and circumstances of falls Conventional methods for monitoring falls include postcards, calendars, diaries or telephone calls, but online surveys have not been used even though there are clear benefits Participant benefit includes ease of responding and researcher benefits include ease of dissemination, reduced costs, and digitally recorded responses Since young adults readily adopt web-based technologies, a daily online survey provides an ideal mechanism for fall assessment in this age group While falls are important to quantify, it is also important to consider perturbations that not result in a fall, for example slips and trips The circumstances of these perturbations in the field are understudied, but provide important information such as how many times people successfully recover from perturbations The purpose of this study was to document the frequency and circumstances of slips, trips and falls in young adults with a daily online survey Methods Ninety-four undergraduate students (age 19.9 ± 0.9 years, range 18–22 years, 33 males; height 171.4 ± 9.5 cm; weight 71.1 ± 14.3 kg) participated in this study All students were taking the same course: 34 students participated in the fall semester (mid-August to mid-December), and 60 students participated in the spring semester (mid-January to mid-May) Participating students received 1% extra credit In order to limit coercion to participate in the survey, students who wanted to receive the 1% credit were offered the choice of completing a short written assignment or participating in the survey Of the 114 students enrolled in the courses, 94 chose to participate in the survey (82%) Participants were not provided any instruction regarding completion requirements; all students who agreed to participate received full academic credit even if they did not respond to the daily emails Participants who responded to less than 35% of the daily emails were excluded from the analysis (Usdan, Schumacher, & Bernhardt, 2004) All participants completed an online consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board The slip, trip, and fall survey consists of an initial survey (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, initial survey) (collected once at the beginning of the 16 weeks) and the daily survey (see Supplemental Digital Content 2, daily online survey) (collected daily for 16 weeks) Surveys were developed and distributed using Qualtrics Survey Software (Qualtrics Labs Inc Provo, UT), and could be completed on any internet-connected device (computer, tablet, or smartphone, Fig 1) 2.1 Initial survey The initial survey included participant demographics (e.g age, sex, height, weight) and physical activity level (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, initial survey) Activity level was measured using the Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (LTEQ) (Godin & Shephard, 1985) 2.2 Daily Survey In the daily survey, participants received an email every day at 6:00 AM asking if they had slipped, tripped or fallen in the past 24 h A fall was defined as ‘‘An undesired contact of any body part (other than the feet) with the ground or a lower surface” (Weerdesteyn et al., 2006); this definition was provided each day with the first set of questions (Fig 1a) Similarly, definitions for a slip and trip were provided (Fig 1a) If a slip, trip, or fall was not reported, the survey concluded When the participant reported that a fall had occurred, follow-up questions regarding the circumstances of the fall were presented (for example, see Fig 1b; full set of questions provided in Supplemental Digital Content 2, daily online survey) Briefly, the survey questions were developed from existing literature for causes of falls (Robinovitch et al., 2013) and injuries (Talbot et al., 2005), and to quantify the timing and location of the falls Alcohol and/or drug use was also assessed with the following questions: ‘‘Were you under the influence of any substances that may have affected your balance (e.g alcohol, drugs)?” If ‘‘yes” was selected, a follow up question with a sliding scale was presented: ‘‘From the previous question, probability that the fall was related to balance-altering substance (from to 100).” 88 M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 A B Fig Screenshot of slip, trip, and fall question (a), and circumstances (b) from the daily online survey presented on a mobile phone A participant may fall more than once per day, which would increase the length of time needed to complete the survey and might reduce adherence Therefore, on days when more than one incident occurred, participants were asked to report the total number of incidents (slips, trips, and falls), and to only describe the circumstances of the fall that resulted in injury or the participant perceived as interrupting their movement the most 2.3 Statistical analyses To quantify the change in adherence over the 16-week period, a linear regression was performed (SAS 9.3, Cary, NC, USA) A Poisson regression was used to test for a relationship between activity level (LTEQ score) and the number of falls (Mplus, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, USA) A p-value of 0.05 was selected Results 3.1 Response rate The average response rate was 93% (Fig 2) The response rate demonstrated a linear decrease of 0.6% per week (p < 0.001; Fig 2) Five respondents (5%) had a response rate less than 35%; these participants were excluded from the results reported Response Rate (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 12 Week Number 16 Fig Response rate over time; the five participants who had a response rate less than 35% are included in this data M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 89 Percent of Participants 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Number of Falls Fig Percentage of participants described as a function of the number of falls; the five participants who had a response rate less than 35% are not included Number of Falls Fallers (N=46) Non-Fallers (N=42) 0 50 100 150 200 250 LTEQ Score Fig Relationship between physical activity level (measured with the Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire) and the number of falls; the five participants who had a response rate less than 35% are not included Poisson regression analyses indicated that physical activity level did not distinguish fallers from non-fallers (p = 0.45), but fallers who were more active had higher numbers of falls than fallers who were less active (p = 0.007) below (Usdan et al., 2004), in Figs and 4, and in Table The response rate ranged from 52–100% for the remaining participants 3.2 Slips and trips that did not result in a fall A total of 1495 slips and trips were perceived and reported (average: 1.0 perturbation per week per participant) 3.3 Falls Eighty-two falls were reported by 46 participants (52%) The number of falls ranged from to 5, with 31% of participants falling once and 21% falling more than once (Fig 3) Of the participants that reported a fall, the average (median) number of falls was 1.8 (1.0) The number of falls due to a slip or trip expressed as a percentage of total slips and trips was 5% The percentage of falls indoors versus outdoors was 37% versus 63% There were nine reports of two falls in one day, and no reports of more than two falls in one day Since participants were only asked to report on the most disruptive fall each day, no reports are available on the causes and circumstances of nine falls (11%) We recommend that future studies examine all falls that occur each day, since experiencing more than one fall a day was not an uncommon occurrence in these young adults 90 M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 Table Circumstances of falls Since data collection included winter, the data are presented with all falls included, and also with falls due to outdoor slips on ice/snow removed All falls (total 73 falls) Outdoor falls due to ice/snow removed (total 45 falls) What was your fall due to? Slip Trip/stumble Hit/bump Fell asleep/legs collapsed/loss of consciousness Weight shift Loss of support with object Unknown Cannot remember Other 48(35) 25(18) 8(6) 1(1) 5(4) 3(2) 0(0) 1(1) 8(6) 20(9) 40(18) 13(6) 2(1) 9(4) 4(2) 0(0) 2(1) 9(4) What were you doing when it happened? Standing Walking Running/jogging Seated Transfer from seated to standing or standing to seated Sport/athletic activity Other 1(1) 58(41) 10(7) 0(0) 4(3) 11(8) 15(11) 7(3) 44(19) 12(5) 0(0) 9(4) 16(7) 21(9) Were you doing anything else at the time? No Talking to friend Talking on phone Texting Daydreaming Other 62(44) 32(23) 0(0) 3(2) 0(0) 3(2) 47(20) 44(19) 0(0) 5(2) 0(0) 5(2) Was there something in the environment that caused the fall? No Flat surface Irregular surface Crack in sidewalk/broken sidewalk Tree root/stick Curb Stair Ice/slippery Hill Footwear Grass Pet/animal Clutter Other 10(9) 2(2) 11(10) 3(3) 1(1) 2(2) 12(11) 38(34) 8(7) 3(3) 0(0) 0(0) 2(2) 7(6) 16(8) 4(2) 16(8) 6(3) 0(0) 4(2) 14(7) 16(8) 6(3) 6(3) 0(0) 0(0) 4(2) 8(4) Were you injured during the fall? Yes No 16(13) 84(58) 20(9) 80(34) What was the level of lighting when it happened? Well lit (bright light) Poorly lit (dark or dim lighting) 55(39) 45(32) 58(25) 42(18) Where were you (select all that apply)? Indoors Outdoors 37(25) 63(42) 64(25) 36(14) When did it occur? 6:00 AM – Noon (12:00 PM) Noon (12:00 PM) – 6:00 PM 6:00 PM – Midnight (12:00 AM) Midnight (12:00 AM) – 6:00 AM 19(13) 24(17) 47(33) 10(7) 12(5) 26(11) 50(21) 12(5) Values are percentages (frequency) 3.4 Falls related to alcohol and drugs The fallers reported that they were under the influence of substances (alcohol/drugs) that may have affected their balance in 9% of the falls The average (median) perceived likelihood that the fall was related to the substance was 44% (50%), with a range from 0% to 100% M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 91 3.5 Falls that did not result from winter weather The participants had a much higher fall rate than previously reported for young adults (Talbot et al., 2005), but the fall rate in the students who participated in the spring semester (71% of participants) may have been inflated by slippery conditions related to snowfall in central Indiana (26 cm of snow from January to May 2015 (www.wunderground.com) Therefore, the results were also reported with these falls excluded (Table 1, right column) After removing these falls, the fall rate was 51 falls in 27 young adults (30%), and the average (median) number of falls was 1.1 (1.0) 3.6 Circumstances of falls The main cause of a fall was a slip (48%) or a trip (25%), and the majority of falls occurred while walking (58%) (Table 1) When winter weather was excluded, trips were the main cause (40%), followed by slips (20%), and walking remained the most common activity (44%) Participants also fell during athletic activities (including running, jogging, sports), accounting for 21% of the falls Participants entered the following as examples of ‘other causes of falls’ (15% of the falls): pestering someone next to me, trying to pick up a document off the printer, pushing a car out of the snow, and jumping Approximately half of the falls occurred while multitasking Talking to a friend was the most common multitasking activity (32%); few falls occurred while texting (3%) (Table 1) Ice/slippery surface (38%) and stairs (12%) were the main environmental causes for falls 3.7 Injuries from falls Injuries were reported in 13 of the 82 falls (16%); these injuries included five contusions (38%), four abrasions (31%), two concussions (15%), one fracture (8%), and one self-report of general soreness (8%) Participants reported receiving medical treatment in three falls (23% of all injuries, 4% of all falls) When expressed as a function of all participants, 12% of participants (11 of 89 participants) reported an injury due to a fall (two participants had two injuries in two falls), and 3% of participants (3 of 89) received medical treatment for an injury due to a fall 3.8 Other circumstances associated with falls Falls occurred about equally in high-light and low-light circumstances (55 and 45%, respectively; Table 1) Most falls (63%) occurred outdoors when falls due to winter weather were included, and when falls due to winter weather were excluded most falls (64%) occurred indoors (Table 1) About half of the falls occurred in the h period from pm to 12 am (Table 1) 3.9 Physical activity and falls The LTEQ score (physical activity level) did not distinguish fallers from non-fallers (Fig 4, white vs black circles; p = 0.45, assessed with Poisson regression) However, the Poisson regression identified a significant relationship between the LTEQ score and the number of falls for fallers (Fig 4, black circles; p = 0.007) Fallers with a higher physical activity level reported more falls than fallers with a lower activity level The slope of the regression (0.007) indicates that for every 143 point increase in LTEQ score, one more fall was observed in the fallers Discussion The aim of this study was to document the frequency and circumstances of slips, trips and falls in young adults with a 16week daily online survey In the 16-week interval, high fall rates were observed, and the findings here provide new insight into the prevalence and circumstances of falls in young adults when a daily online survey is used Falls were related to both environmental and subject-specific factors, supporting the prevailing contention that the causes of falls are multi-factorial Before the prevalence and circumstances are discussed, it is important to demonstrate that participants will regularly complete the daily online survey, so the response rate is discussed first High response rates (93%) indicate that, on most days, young adults will complete a daily online survey of slips, trips, and falls (Fig 2) A similar response rate (82%) was observed with a different online daily survey, which investigated impaired driving for five weeks in young adults (Usdan et al., 2004) Therefore, daily online surveys over an extended period appear feasible for young adults If the linear decrease in response rate of 0.6% per week was maintained (Fig 2), the average response rate would be 82% at the end of six months, and 67% at the end of one year These response rates are still reasonable, but the large number of falls observed here indicates that a 16-week interval may be adequate to capture fall behavior Future studies should determine response rates for longer intervals, and also determine if the first 16 weeks can be used to predict falls over longer intervals An online survey has many benefits including ease of dissemination, ease of response, reduced costs, and digitally recorded responses Given that multiple email surveys are regularly sent out from various sources (e.g for marketing purposes), it may be difficult to get people to respond to this survey without some form of com- 92 M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 pensation However, in a pilot study, we assessed 25 volunteers (age range 20–90 years) who did not receive compensation (Heijnen & Rietdyk, 2014) The daily survey in the pilot study was longer than the daily survey used here; the response rates were 80%, 86%, and 89% for age groups 20–35 years, 36–65 years and greater than 65 years, respectively Therefore, it appears that daily online surveys are feasible to assess falls in multiple age groups if the participants have daily access to email Over half of the young adults observed in this study fell in 16 weeks (52%), and this rate remained high (30%) when falls that resulted from the winter weather were excluded (Table 1) It is reasonable to expect that high fall rates in healthy young adults would result from participation in activities with higher fall-risk, such as sports However, the fact that the majority of falls occurred while walking supports the prevailing argument that bipeds are mechanically unstable and also demonstrates that walking is a challenging task (Winter, 1991) The findings reported here – that young healthy adults regularly experience falls during walking – highlight the challenge of preventing falls in people with compromised balance However, the survey findings may help identify interventions that are most likely to reduce falling in young adults Slips and trips were reported as the most common causes of falls in young adults, similar to that reported for older adults (73% reported here for young adults versus 53–59% for older adults (Berg et al., 1997; Blake et al., 1988) Therefore, fall interventions should continue to focus on novel slip- and trip-training interventions (Bieryla, Madigan, & Nussbaum, 2007; Mansfield, Peters, Liu, & Maki, 2010; Pai & Bhatt, 2007; Rosenblatt & Grabiner, 2012) In fact, the high fall rates observed here indicate that young subjects may provide an ideal population to establish training parameters that are most effective at reducing falls This may streamline training in populations with compromised balance The observation that 12% of falls resulted from tripping on stairs supports the continued examination of visual attention and motor behavior during stair walking (Den Otter, Hoogwerf, & Van Der Woude, 2011; Telonio et al., 2014; Zietz & Hollands, 2009) and environmental modifications to improve stair safety (Foster, Hotchkiss, Buckley, & Elliott, 2014) In older adults, falls are believed to result from the interaction of environmental hazards and individual susceptibility based on subject-specific gait characteristics (Connell et al., 1997; Rubenstein, 2006) The daily on-line survey can be used to more fully understand this relationship across all ages For example, while environmental causes were identified in most falls, 10% of falls in young adults were not perceived to be related to an environmental hazard (Table 1) Therefore, a subjectspecific factor such as gait characteristics was the likely cause We have preliminary evidence that foot clearance when stepping over obstacles in the laboratory setting is related to falls documented with the survey (Heijnen & Rietdyk, 2015) Future studies can further quantify the relationship between environmental demand, gait characteristics and falls by combining the slip, trip, and fall survey with gait assessments The fall rates observed here in 16 weeks (52%) are substantially higher than the rate reported for young adults in two years (18%) (Talbot et al., 2005) Note that the participants in Talbot et al (2005) were from Baltimore and would also have experienced winter weather in the two year interval The most likely reason for the substantially higher fall rates is a greater ability to recall falls with the daily assessment observed here versus the biennial assessment used in Talbot et al (2005) This argument is supported by the much lower injury rates observed here (16%) versus the previous research (71%) with a 2-year survey (Talbot et al., 2005) In the latter study, it is likely that most falls that did not result in injury were forgotten Noninjurious falls that were recalled were likely memorable in some other way, such as they happened more recently or someone observed the fall However, other factors may also contribute to the large differences in fall rates across the two studies For example, the participants in Talbot et al (2005) ranged in age from 20–45 years and would have been more heterogeneous than our sample of undergraduate students that ranged in age from 18 to 22 years Factors more common to young undergraduate students, such as risk-taking behaviors, may have resulted in higher fall rates (although note that 91% of falls were described as not related to alcohol/drug consumption, as described below) Future research should examine more heterogeneous groups over multiple ages and in multiple geographical locations to fully quantify falls in young adults The injuries reported by the participants indicate that falls are not a trivial issue in young adults Injuries including contusions, abrasions, concussions, and fracture were observed in 16% of falls The injuries were severe enough to require medical treatment in 4% of falls Expressed another way, 3% of participants required medical treatment for a fall in a four month period Larger data bases should be developed to more fully understand the relationship between falls in young adults and serious injuries, such as TBI (Rusnak, 2013) In the majority of the falls (91%), the participants reported that they were not under the influence of any substances that may have affected their balance While it appears reasonable to expect that alcohol consumption is related to falls, the association between usual alcohol use and fall risk was inconclusive in young and middle-aged adults (Kool, Ameratunga, & Jackson, 2009), and has been described as inconsistent in older adults (Mukamal et al., 2004) Increased knowledge of this relationship could be obtained in future research by adding daily alcohol consumption to the daily fall survey, providing a longitudinal assessment However, the observation that most falls occurred when the participant was not under the influence of substances further supports the argument that biped locomotion is inherently unstable even in healthy young adults While it seems likely that more active participants will be more likely to fall, physical activity level did not differ between participants who reported a fall (fallers) and participants who did not fall (non-fallers) (Fig 4) Therefore, something other than activity level puts the young, healthy individual at risk for falling, such as an individual’s general balance or adaptive gait characteristics (Heijnen, Muir, & Rietdyk, 2012) Another possibility is that physically active non-fallers tend to be active in environments where fall-risk is lower (e.g in a gym or in a swimming pool), while the fallers may act in environments where fall-risk is higher (e.g running or hiking outdoors) Future studies could explore this by including questions regarding the type of physical activity Although activity level did not differentiate fallers from non-fallers, there was a relationship M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 93 between activity level and number of falls within the faller group: fallers who were more active reported more falls (Fig 4) It will be informative to determine if the same relationships are observed in older groups in order to increase knowledge of fall risk in older adults The role of multitasking in falling was assessed by asking if participants were doing anything else in addition to the main activity There has been recent concern about injuries associated with texting while walking (Nasar & Troyer, 2013) However, few falls occurred while texting (Table 1), so this study did not support this concern Most participants were either not doing anything else at the time of the fall (62%) or were talking to a friend (32%) Walking while talking is commonly performed and appears simple However, it requires multi-task management of language formulation, speech generation, locomotion, and terrain navigation The high cognitive demands associated with walking while talking are consistent with the following observations: (1) older adults who stop walking in order to talk are more likely to fall (Lundin-Olsson, Nyberg, & Gustafson, 1997), and (2) young adults modify both speech and gait in order to walk and talk simultaneously (Raffegeau, Rietdyk, Haddad, & Huber, 2013) However, the observation that talking was the most common other activity during a fall may simply reflect that young adults regularly engage in walking while talking, and this just happened to be what they were doing when they fell Further research is needed to determine if walking while talking increases fall-risk The number of slips and trips, without an associated fall, were variable, ranging from to 15 per day (data not shown) These between-subject differences could be due to different activities, environments, levels of attention, etc Although definitions of slips, trips, and falls were provided in the daily survey, differences could also be due to the ability to perceive and recall slips and trips, as they may be so common that they are routinely ignored Thus, the average number of slips and trips (1.0 per week per participant) is likely higher However, it is clear that young healthy adults regularly experience perturbations Further, the ratio of falls to perturbation provides a unique assessment Young adults, on average, fell once every 18 slips and trips A higher ratio (i.e fall for every slips and trips) would reflect a decreased ability to recover adequately from perturbations, and the person may benefit from specific slip and/ or trip training (e.g (Bieryla et al., 2007; Mansfield et al., 2010; Pai & Bhatt, 2007; Rosenblatt & Grabiner, 2012) Comparison of falls to the number of slips and trips is a unique parameter that can only be assessed with a daily online survey, due to the frequency of slips and trips The frequency and circumstances of falls in younger adults assessed here has been highly informative, but the web survey would be also be beneficial in middle-aged and older adults, as they are also at risk of falls and injury (CDC) As noted above, in the pilot study older adults with email access responded regularly to the daily online survey without compensation (Heijnen & Rietdyk, 2014) This will be especially useful in the future as internet use among adults 55 years and older increased from 34% to 62% from 2001 to 2011; this percentage will continue to grow Further, the survey can also be used to test fall behavior hypotheses, such as, is a change in the frequency of slips and trips predictive of a future fall? Therefore, online fall surveys may be a viable tool as internet use continues to increase in all age groups There are several limitations to assessing falls with an online survey The main limitation of an online survey is undercoverage (Bethlehem, 2010), with participation limited to people who have internet access This will lead to biased results if there are fall-related differences between internet users and non-internet users Age (File, 2013), level of education (Bethlehem, 2010), gender (Seybert, 2013), race (File, 2013; Seybert, 2013) and country (File, 2013; Seybert, 2013) play a role in the likelihood of internet access Households with internet access in European countries ranged from 49% to 96% in 2012 (Seybert, 2013) and was 72% in the United States in 2011 (File, 2013) However, the percentage of household with internet in the United States increased from 50% in 2001 to 72% in 2011 (File, 2013) Under-coverage will decrease as the populations with internet continue to grow Other limitations of an online daily survey include survey fatigue, self-selection bias, and self-report While our response rate was strong over 16-weeks, survey fatigue may become an issue for longer surveys, and it is not yet known if longer surveys are necessary Self-selection bias may occur if people who perceive that they have very good or very poor balance may be more willing to participate in a daily online survey on slips, trips, and falls Finally, self-reporting frequency and circumstances of falls can be problematic It is important to provide standard definitions of a slip, trip, and fall to the subject to reduce between-subject differences in frequency of slips, trips, and falls (e.g (Verma et al., 2011), which is why the definitions were provided to participants each day (Fig 1a) Self-report is also limited by the ability to accurately recall the circumstances of a fall, as this is known to be problematic in young adults (Feldman & Robinovitch, 2006) and older adults (Ganz et al., 2005) Summary Overall, high fall rates coupled with serious injuries indicate that falls are a critical issue in young adults The majority of falls were due to slips and trips, and, on average, one fall occurred for every 18 slips and trips Activity level did not differ between fallers and non-fallers, however, fallers that were more physically active fell more frequently than less active fallers These results address an understudied yet important question, and highlight the mechanically unstable nature of bipedal locomotion Conflict of interest The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist 94 M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 Appendix A Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov 2015.12.007 References Berg, W P., Alessio, H M., Mills, E M., & Tong, C (1997) Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults Age and ageing, 26(4), 261–268 Bethlehem, J (2010) Selection bias in web surveys International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188 Bieryla, K A., Madigan, M L., & Nussbaum, M A (2007) Practicing recovery from a simulated trip improves recovery kinematics after an actual trip Gait & posture, 26(2), 208–213 Blake, A., Morgan, K., Bendall, M., Dallosso, H., Ebrahim, S., Arie, T., et al (1988) Falls by elderly people at home: Prevalence and associated factors Age and Ageing, 17(6), 365–372 CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS): nonfatal injury reports Chen, H C., Ashton-Miller, J A., Alexander, N B., & Schultz, A B (1991) Stepping over obstacles: Gait patterns of healthy young and old adults Journal of Gerontology, 46(6) M196-203 Connell, B R., Wolf, S L., & Atlanta FICSIT Group (1997) Environmental and behavioral circumstances associated with falls at home among healthy elderly individuals Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(2), 179–186 Cummings, S R., Nevitt, M C., & Kidd, S (1988) Forgetting falls Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 36(7), 613–616 Den Otter, A., Hoogwerf, M., & Van Der Woude, L (2011) The role of tread fixations in the visual control of stair walking Gait & posture, 34(2), 169–173 Feldman, F., & Robinovitch, S (2006) Recalling the mechanics of falls: Young adults cannot accurately describe the sites of impact immediately after a fall occurs Osteoporosis International File, T (2013) Computer and internet use in the United States Current population survey reports Washington, DC: U.S Census Bureau, pp 20–569 Foster, R J., Hotchkiss, J., Buckley, J G., & Elliott, D B (2014) Safety on stairs: Influence of a tread edge highlighter and its position Experimental Gerontology, 55, 152–158 Ganz, D A., Higashi, T., & Rubenstein, L Z (2005) Monitoring falls in cohort studies of community-dwelling older people: Effect of the recall interval Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(12), 2190–2194 Godin, G., & Shephard, R J (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(3), 141–146 Heijnen, M J H., Muir, B C., & Rietdyk, S (2012) Factors leading to obstacle contact during adaptive locomotion Experimental Brain Research, 223(2), 219–231 Heijnen, M J H., & Rietdyk, S (2014) Daily online assessment of slips, trips, and falls across the lifespan In Paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Biomechanics Boston, MA Heijnen, M J H., & Rietdyk, S (2015) Falls in the real world are related to obstacle crossing behaviors in a lab setting for young adults In Paper presented at the international society of posture & gait research world congress Seville, Spain Hill, K., Schwarz, J., Flicker, L., & Carroll, S (1999) Falls among healthy, community-dwelling, older women: A prospective study of frequency, circumstances, consequences and prediction accuracy Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23(1), 41 Kannus, P., Sievanen, H., Palvanen, M., Jarvinen, T., & Parkkari, J (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people The Lancet, 366, 1885–1893 Kool, B., Ameratunga, S., & Jackson, R (2009) The role of alcohol in unintentional falls among young and middle-aged adults: a systematic review of epidemiological studies Injury Prevention, 15(5), 341–347 Lee, H.-J., & Chou, L.-S (2006) Detection of gait instability using the center of mass and center of pressure inclination angles Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(4), 569–575 Lundin-Olsson, L., Nyberg, L., & Gustafson, Y (1997) ‘‘Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people The Lancet, 349(9052), 617 Luukinen, H., Koski, K., Hiltunen, L., & Kivelä, S.-L (1994) Incidence rate of falls in an aged population in northern Finland Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47 (8), 843–850 Mansfield, A., Peters, A L., Liu, B A., & Maki, B E (2010) Effect of a perturbation-based balance training program on compensatory stepping and grasping reactions in older adults: A randomized controlled trial Physical Therapy, 90(4), 476–491 Muir, B C., Haddad, J M., Heijnen, M J H., & Rietdyk, S (2015) Proactive gait strategies to mitigate risk of obstacle contact are more prevalent with advancing age Gait & Posture, 41(1), 233–239 Mukamal, K J., Mittleman, M A., Longstreth, W., Newman, A B., Fried, L P., & Siscovick, D S (2004) Self-reported alcohol consumption and falls in older adults: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of the cardiovascular health study Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(7), 1174–1179 Nasar, J L., & Troyer, D (2013) Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 91–95 Pai, Y C., & Bhatt, T S (2007) Repeated-slip training: An emerging paradigm for prevention of slip-related falls among older adults Physical Therapy, 87(11), 1478–1491 Peel, N (2000) Validating recall of falls by older people Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(3), 371–372 Raffegeau, T., Rietdyk, S., Haddad, J M., & Huber, J (2013) Gait and Speech are Interdependent in Young Healthy Adults In Paper presented at the 60th annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine and 4th World Congress on Exercise is Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA Robinovitch, S N., Feldman, F., Yang, Y., Schonnop, R., Leung, P M., Sarraf, T., et al (2013) Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study The Lancet, 381(9860), 47–54 Rosenblatt, N., & Grabiner, M D (2012) The problem is falls: The answer is kinesiology Kinesiology Review, 1, 32–36 Rubenstein, L Z (2006) Falls in older people: Epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention Age and Ageing, 35 (Suppl 2), ii37–ii41 Rubenstein, L Z., & Josephson, K R (2002) The epidemiology of falls and syncope Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 18(2), 141–158 Rusnak, M (2013) Traumatic brain injury: Giving voice to a silent epidemic Nature Reviews Neurology, 9(4), 186–187 Seybert, H (2013) Internet use in households and by individuals in 2012 Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 50/2012 Accessed 16.09.14) Talbot, L A., Musiol, R J., Witham, E K., & Metter, E J (2005) Falls in young, middle-aged and older community dwelling adults: Perceived cause, environmental factors and injury BMC Public Health, 5(1), 86 Telonio, A., Blanchet, S., Maganaris, C N., Baltzopoulos, V., Villeneuve, S., & McFadyen, B J (2014) The division of visual attention affects the transition point from level walking to stair descent in healthy, active older adults Experimental Gerontology, 50, 26–33 Usdan, S L., Schumacher, J E., & Bernhardt, J M (2004) Impaired driving behaviors among college students: A comparison of web-based daily assessment and retrospective timeline followback Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 48, 34–50 Verma, S K., Chang, W R., Courtney, T K., Lombardi, D A., Huang, Y.-H., Brennan, M J., et al (2011) A prospective study of floor surface, shoes, floor cleaning and slipping in US limited-service restaurant workers Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 68(4), 279–285 Weerdesteyn, V., Rijken, H., Geurts, A C., Smits-Engelsman, B C., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J (2006) A five-week exercise program can reduce falls and improve obstacle avoidance in the elderly Gerontology, 52(3), 131–141 WHO (2012) Falls M.J.H Heijnen, S Rietdyk / Human Movement Science 46 (2016) 86–95 95 Winter, D A (1991) Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research Gait & posture, 16(1), 1–14 www.wunderground.com Weather history|weather underground Retrieved from Zietz, D., & Hollands, M (2009) Gaze behavior of young and older adults during stair walking Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(4), 357–366