Paper % _ Rank _ Project % _ Rank _ Exit Project Evaluation Rubric Họ tên SV _ Tên Project Họ tên GV _ Tất Project phải gởi cho Giáo viên thời gian kết thúc dự án Thời gian cần đưa GV để tránh mâu thuẫn All projects must be submitted to Senior Advisors by the assigned deadline This time needs to be scheduled with the Senior Advisor well in advance to avoid conflicts Failure to submit the project before the target date will result in additional documented hours on the Exit Project Planning and Time Management: This score indicates the amount of time spent planning the project and the effectiveness of time management skills throughout the completion of the project (meeting assigned deadlines, turning in paperwork, etc.) Indicator Level Level Level Level Level Level PLANNING & TIME MANAGEMENT Circle one No evidence of planning Procrastination lead to incomplete project 1.5 Little planning or forethought Project hastily completed for deadline 2.5 Basic planning and time management needs necessary for project completion met 3.5 Planning and time management exhibited enhance the overall project 4.5 Exhibits a professional level of planning and time management Comments: Points Possible: Score Time and Effort: This score indicates the amount of time and effort the student expended completing the project Indicator TIME AND EFFORT Circle one Level No evidence of effort Level Little or no “authentic” time spent on project 1.5 Level Minimal effort Met minimum time requirements and didn’t complete project 2.5 Level Level Meets basic time and effort required to complete project Time and effort expended on project enhances the overall project 3.5 Level 4.5 Exhibits a professional level of time and effort expended on project Comments: Points Possible: Score Evidence of Learning and Risk Factor: This score indicates the level of knowledge gained by the student evident through the project, and the extent to which the student was “stretched” or took risks through the project experience Indicator EVIDENCE OF LEARNING AND RISK FACTOR Circle one Level No evidence of genuine learning Level Level Level Level Level Student never stretched their knowledge/capabi lities Little demonstration of genuine learning; limited risks taken Project demonstrates genuine learning/risks were taken for expanding knowledge and skills Project and project experience clearly “stretched” student knowledge and skills 4.5 Student took several risks to achieve a superior level of knowledge and skills through the project process 1.5 2.5 Updated: April 20, 2011 3.5 Comments: Points Possible: Score Updated: 10 August 2016 Degree of Difficulty: This score indicates the variety and complexity of the components to completing the project Indicator Level Project incomplete DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY Circle one Level Level Not ageappropriate difficulty Level Little degree of difficulty evident One dimensional project 1.5 2.5 Level Project comprised of more than one component of appropriate difficulty 3.5 Level Project comprised of multiple components or components exhibit great difficulty 4.5 Project complexity approaches professional quality Comments: Points Possible: Score Portfolio Preparation: This score indicates the quality of the portfolio Indicator Level Missing portfolio PORTFOLIO PREPARATION Circle one Level Incomplete portfolio Some required sections missing 1.5 Level Level Level Level Portfolio has major formatting and/or many spelling errors Portfolio complete with several minor errors Portfolio complete with very few minor errors Portfolio clear, concise, accessible, with unique content Contents concise and accessible 4.5 No formatting or spelling errors 2.5 3.5 Comments: Points Possible: Score Quality of Final Project: This score indicates the actual quality of the physical product or quality of the project experience, with “professional” quality being a score of Indicator QUALITY OF FINAL PROJECT Circle one Level Level No physical project or documentation of project experience Little concern for project quality or incomplete project Level 1.5 Project completed but demonstrates low quality 2.5 Level Level Level Project demonstrates appropriate quality High quality project illustrates student work ethic 4.5 Professional quality product or project experience 3.5 Comments: Points Possible: Score Comments: Updated: 10 August 2016 Total Score Final Points Percent Rank Project Ranking Key Exceptional 90-100%27-30 points Commendable 75-89% 23-26 points Acceptable 60-74% 18-22 points Unacceptable 59% or less 17 or less Updated: 10 August 2016