PoIa rized light Second Edition, Revised and Expanded Dennis Goldstein Air Force Research Laboratory Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, U.S.A Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Although great care has been taken to provide accurate and current information, neither the author(s) nor the publisher, nor anyone else associated with this publication, shall be liable for any loss, damage, or liability directly or indirectly caused or alleged to be caused by this book The material contained herein is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any specific situation Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe The first edition was published as Polarized Light: Fundamentals and Applications, Edward Collett (Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993) ISBN: 0-8247-4053-X This book is printed on acid-free paper Headquarters Marcel Dekker, Inc 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 tel: 212-696-9000; fax: 212-685-4540 Eastern Hemisphere Distribution Marcel Dekker AG Hutgasse 4, Postfach 812, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland tel: 41-61-261-8482; fax: 41-61-261-8896 World Wide Web http://www.dekker.com The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered in bulk quantities For more information, write to Special Sales/Professional Marketing at the headquarters address above Copyright ß 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher Current printing (last digit): 10 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved OPTICAL ENGINEERING Founding Editor Brian J Thompson University of Rochester Rochester New York Electron and Ion Microscopy and Microanalysis: Principles and Applications, Lawrence E Mum Acousto-Optic Signal Processing: Theory and Implementation, edited by Nor man J Berg and John N Lee Electro-Opticand Acousto-Optic Scanning and Deflection, Milton Gofflieb, Clive L M Ireland, and John Martin Ley Single-Mode Fiber Optics: Principles and Applications, Luc B Jeunhomme Pulse Code Formats for Fiber Optical Data Communication: Basic Principles and Applications, David J Monis Optical Materials: An Introduction to Selection and Application, Solomon Musikant Infrared Methods for Gaseous Measurements: Theory and Practice, edited by Joda Wonnhoudt Laser Beam Scanning: Opto-Mechanical Devices, Systems, and Data Storage Optics, edited by Gerald F Marshall Opto-Mechanical Systems Design, Paul R Yoder, Jr 10 Optical Fiber Splices and Connectors: Theory and Methods, Calvin M Miller with Stephen C Meffler and /an A White 11 Laser Spectroscopy and Its Applications, edited by Leon J Radziemski, Richard W Solan, and Jeffrey A Paisner 12 Infrared Optoelectronics: Devices and Applications, Wlliam Nunley and J Scoff Bechtel 13 Integrated Optical Circuits and Components: Design and Applications, edited by Lynn D Hufcheson 14 Handbook of Molecular Lasers, edited by Peter K Cheo 15 Handbook of Optical Fibers and Cables, Hiroshi Murata 16 Acousto-Optics, Adrian Korpel 17 Procedures in Applied Optics, John Strong 18 Handbook of Solid-state Lasers, edited by Peter K Cheo 19 Optical Computing: Digital and Symbolic, edited by Raymond Arrathoon 20 Laser Applications in Physical Chemistry, edited by D K, Evans 21 Laser-Induced Plasmas and Applications, edited by Leon J Radziemski and David A Cremers 22 Infrared Technology Fundamentals, /wing J Spiro and Monroe Schlessinger 23 Single-Mode Fiber Optics: Principles and Applications, Second Edition, Re vised and Expanded, Luc B Jeunhomme 24 Image Analysis Applications, edited by Rangachar Kasturi and Mohan M Trivedi 25 Photoconductivity: Art, Science, and Technology, N V Joshi 26 Principles of Optical Circuit Engineering, Mark A Mentzer 27 Lens Design, Milton Laikin 28 Optical Components, Systems, and Measurement Techniques, Rajpal S Sirohi and M P Kothiyal Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved 29 Electron and Ion Microscopy and Microanalysis: Principles and Applications, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Lawrence E Murr 30 Handbook of Infrared Optical Materials, edited by Paul KIocek 31 Optical Scanning, edited by Gerald F Marshall 32 Polymers for Lighbave and Integrated Optics: Technology and Applications, edited by Lawrence A Homak 33 Electro-Optical Displays, edited by Mohammad A Karim 34 Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing, edited by Edward R Dougherfy 35 Opto-Mechanical Systems Design: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Paul R Yoder, Jr 36 Polarized Light: Fundamentalsand Applications, Edward Colleff 37 Rare Earth Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers, edited by Michel J f Digonnet 38 Speckle Metrology, edited by Rajpal S Sirohi 39 Organic Photoreceptors for Imaging Systems, Paul M Borsenberger and David S Weiss 40 Photonic Switching and Interconnects,edited by Abdellatif Marrakchi 41 Design and Fabrication of Acousto-Optic Devices, edited by Akis P Goutzoulis and Dennis R Pape 42 Digital Image Processing Methods, edited by Edward R Doughetty 43 Visual Science and Engineering: Models and Applications, edited by D H Kelly 44 Handbook of Lens Design, Daniel Malacara and Zacarias Malacara 45 Photonic Devices and Systems, edited by Robert G Hunsberger 46 Infrared Technology Fundamentals: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Monroe Schlessinger 47 Spatial Light Modulator Technology: Materials, Devices, and Applications, edited by Uzi Efron 48 Lens Design: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Milton Laikin 49 Thin Films for Optical Systems, edited by Francoise R Flory 50 Tunable Laser Applications, edited by f J Duarfe 51 Acousto-Optic Signal Processing: Theory and Implementation, Second Edition, edited by Norman J Berg and John M Pellegrino 52 Handbook of Nonlinear Optics, Richard L Sutherland 53 Handbook of Optical Fibers and Cables: Second Edition, Hiroshi Murata 54 Optical Storage and Retrieval: Memory, Neural Networks, and Fractals, edited by Francis T S Yo and Suganda Jutamulia 55 Devices for Optoelectronics, Wallace B Leigh 56 Practical Design and Production of Optical Thin Films, Ronald R Wlley 57 Acousto-Optics: Second Edition, Adrian Korpel 58 Diffraction Gratings and Applications, Erwin G Loewen and Evgeny Popov 59 Organic Photoreceptors for Xerography, Paul M Borsenberger and David S Weiss 60 Characterization Techniques and Tabulations for Organic Nonlinear Optical Materials, edited by Ma& G, Kuzyk and Carl W Dirk 61 lnterferogram Analysis for Optical Testing, Daniel Malacara, Manuel Setvin, and Zacarias Malacara 62 Computational Modeling of Vision: The Role of Combination, William R Uttal, Ramakrishna Kakarala, Spiram Dayanand, Thomas Shepherd, Jagadeesh Kalki, Charles F Lunskis, Jr., and Ning Liu 63 Microoptics Technology: Fabrication and Applications of Lens Arrays and Devices, Nicholas Bomlli 64 Visual Information Representation, Communication, and Image Processing, edited by Chang Wen Chen and Ya-Qin Zhang 65 Optical Methods of Measurement, Rajpal S Sirohi and F S.Chau 66 Integrated Optical Circuits and Components: Design and Applications, edited by Edmond J Muvhy Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved 67 Adaptive Optics Engineering Handbook, edited by Robert K Tyson 68 Entropy and Information Optics, Francis T S Yu 69 Computational Methods for Electromagnetic and Optical Systems, John M Jarem and Partha P Banerjee 70 Laser Beam Shaping, Fred M Dickey and Scott C Holswade 71 Rare-Earth-Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Michel J F Digonnet 72 Lens Design: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded, Milton Laikin 73 Handbook of Optical Engineering, edited by Daniel Malacara and Brian J Thompson 74 Handbook of Imaging Materials: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Arthur S Diamond and David S Weiss 75 Handbook of Image Quality: Characterization and Prediction, Brian W Keelan 76 Fiber Optic Sensors, edited by Francis T S Yu and Shizhuo Yin 77 Optical Switehing/Nelworking and Computing for Multimedia Systems, edited by Mohsen Guizani and Abdella Battou 78 Image Recognition and Classification: Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, edited by Bahram Javidi 79 Practical Design and Production of Optical Thin Films: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Ronald R Willey 80 Ultrafast Lasers: Technology and Applications, edited by Martin E Fennann, Almantas Galvanauskas, and Gregg Sucha 81 Light Propagation in Periodic Media: Differential Theory and Design, Michel Neviere and Evgeny Popov 82 Handbook of Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Richard L Sutherland 83 Polarized Light: Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Dennis Goldstein Additional Volumes in Preparation Optical Remote Sensing: Science and Technology, Walter Egan Nonlinear Optics: Theory, Numerical Modeling, and Applications, Partha P Banerjee Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Preface to the Second Edition Where there is light, there is polarized light It is in fact difficult to find a source of light that is completely randomly polarized As soon as light interacts with anything, whether through reflection, transmission, or scattering, there is opportunity for polarization to be induced As pointed out in the first sentence of the Preface to the First Edition, polarization is a fundamental characteristic of the transverse wave that is light More than ever, it is a characteristic that must be addressed in modern optical systems and applications Since 1993 when the first edition of this text appeared, there have been many new developments in the measurement and application of polarized light This revised edition includes revisions and corrections of the original text and substantive new material Most of the original figures have been redone Chapter has been expanded to include the derivation of the Fresnel equations with plots of the magnitude and phase of the reflection coefficients Also included in Part I is a chapter with in-depth discussion of the mathematics and meaning of the Mueller matrix In this chapter, there is a discussion of physical realizability and elimination of error sources with eigenvector techniques, and a discussion of Mueller matrix decomposition The Lu–Chipman decomposition has shown that Mueller matrices are separable, so that a general Mueller matrix may be decomposed into a set of product matrices, each dependent on only one of the quantities of diattenuation, retardance, or depolarization A chapter on devices and components has been added to Part III, Applications Those interested in use or measurement of polarized light should have knowledge of available devices and components that serve as polarizers and retarders for various wavelength regions and for various conditions of achromaticity Chapters on Stokes polarimetry and Mueller matrix polarimetry have been inserted in Part III These polarimetric techniques are essential to an understanding of measurement of polarized light and characterization of optical elements Appendixes have been added with summaries of the Jones and Stokes vectors for various states of polarized light, and with summaries of Jones and Mueller matrices for various optical elements An appendix has been included that gives the relations between the Jones and Mueller matrix elements Finally, a comprehensive bibliography has been included Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Ed Collett collected a wonderful set of topics for students of polarized light for the first edition of this book, and he provided a resource that did not exist before It is my hope that the revisions and additions contained in this second edition will make this text even more useful and thorough I express my gratitude to the following colleagues and friends for their critical comments during the creation of this work: Russell A Chipman of the University of Arizona, Robert R Kallman of the University of North Texas, J Scott Tyo of the University of New Mexico, and E.E (Gene) Youngblood and Lynn L Diebler of the Air Force Research Laboratory David Goetsch of Okaloosa-Walton Community College provided wise counsel Finally, I express gratitude to my wife, Carole, and daughters, Dianne and Laura, for their presence and support Dennis Goldstein Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Preface to the First Edition Light is characterized by its intensity, wavelength, and polarization Remarkably, in spite of the importance of polarized light, no book is devoted just to this subject Nearly every book on optics contains several chapters on polarized light However, if one tries to obtain a deeper understanding of the subject, one quickly discovers that it is almost always necessary to go to the original papers in the literature The objective of this book therefore is to provide a single source that describes the fundamental behavior of polarized light and its interaction with matter The book is designed to be used by scientists and engineers working in the fields of physics, optics, opto-electronics, chemistry, biology, and mechanical and electrical engineering as well as advanced undergraduate and graduate students There are two well-known books on polarized light The first is W A Shurcliff ’s Polarized Light, an excellent introductory and reference book on the subject The other book, also excellent, is Ellipsometry and Polarized Light by R M A Azzam and N M Bashara It is very advanced and is directed to those working in the field of ellipsometry While it contains much information on polarized light, its approach to the subject is very different Ellipsometry is important, however, and an introductory discussion is included here in the final chapter This book is divided into three parts One can begin the study of polarized light with Maxwell’s equations However, one soon discovers that in optics, unlike the field of microwave physics, Maxwell’s equations are not readily apparent; this was why in the nineteenth century Fresnel’s elastic equations were only slowly displaced by Maxwell’s equations Much of the subject of polarized light can be studied and understood almost independently of Maxwell’s equations This is the approach taken in Part I We begin with the wave equation and quickly move on to the polarization ellipse At this point the observable concept of the optical field is introduced, and in succeeding chapters we discover that much new information is revealed on the nature as well as the description of polarized light and its interaction with polarizing elements Ultimately, however, it becomes necessary to describe the source of the radiation field and polarized light At this point no further progress can be made without Maxwell’s equations Therefore, in Part II of this book, Maxwell’s equations are introduced and then used to describe the emission of polarized radiation by accelerating electrons In turn, the emitted radiation is then formulated in Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved terms of the Stokes vector and Mueller matrices and applied to the description of unpolarized light, the Zeeman effect, synchrotron radiation, scattering, and the Faraday effect In particular, we shall see that the Stokes vector takes on a very interesting role in describing spectral lines In Part III, a number of important applications of polarized light are presented, namely, propagation in anisotropic media (crystals), opto-isolators, electro-optical modulation, reflection from metals, and a final introductory chapter on ellipsometry The creation of this book could have happened only with the support of my family I wish to express my gratitude to my children Ronald Edward and Gregory Scott, and especially to my wife, Marilyn, for their continuous support, encouragement and interest Without it, this book would have never been completed Edward Collett Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Contents Preface to the Second Edition Preface to the First Edition A Historical Note Edward Collett PART I: THE CLASSICAL OPTICAL FIELD Chapter Introduction References Chapter The Wave Equation in Classical Optics 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Wave Equation 2.3 Young’s Interference Experiment 2.4 Reflection and Transmission of a Wave at an Interface References Chapter The Polarization Ellipse 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The Instantaneous Optical Field and the Polarization Ellipse 3.3 Specialized (Degenerate) Forms of the Polarization Ellipse 3.4 Elliptical Parameters of the Polarization Ellipse References Chapter The 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Stokes Polarization Parameters Introduction Derivation of the Stokes Polarization Parameters The Stokes Vector Classical Measurement of the Stokes Polarization Parameters Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved 4.5 Stokes Parameters for Unpolarized and Partially Polarized Light 4.6 Additional Properties of the Stokes Polarization Parameters 4.7 Stokes Parameters and Wolf’s Coherency Matrix References Chapter The 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Mueller Matrices for Polarizing Components Introduction The Mueller Matrix of a Polarizer The Mueller Matrix of a Retarder The Mueller Matrix of a Rotator Mueller Matrices for Rotated Polarizing Components 5.6 Generation of Elliptically Polarized Light References Chapter Methods of Measuring the Stokes Polarization Parameters 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Classical Measurement Method: The Quarter-Wave Retarder Polarizer Method 6.3 Measurement of the Stokes Parameters Using a Circular Polarizer 6.4 The Null-Intensity Method 6.5 Fourier Analysis Using a Rotating Quarter-Wave Retarder 6.6 The Method of Kent and Lawson 6.7 Simple Tests to Determine the State of Polarization of an Optical Beam References Chapter The Measurement of the Characteristics of Polarizing Elements 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Measurement of Attenuation Coefficients of a Polarizer (Diattenuator) 7.3 Measurement of Phase Shift of a Retarder 7.4 Measurement of Rotation Angle of a Rotator Reference Chapter Mueller Matrices for Reflection and Transmission 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Fresnel’s Equations for Reflection and Transmission 8.3 Mueller Matrices for Reflection and Transmission at an Air–Dielectric Interface 8.4 Special Forms for the Mueller Matrices for Reflection and Transmission References Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Chapter The Mathematics of the Mueller Matrix 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Constraints on the Mueller Matrix 9.3 Eigenvector and Eigenvalue Analysis 9.4 Example of Eigenvector Analysis 9.5 The Lu–Chipman Decomposition 9.6 Summary References Chapter 10 The Mueller Matrices for Dielectric Plates 10.1 Introduction 10.2 The Diagonal Mueller Matrix and the ABCD Polarization Matrix 10.3 Mueller Matrices for Single and Multiple Dielectric Plates References Chapter 11 The Jones Matrix Calculus 11.1 Introduction 11.2 The Jones Vector 11.3 Jones Matrices for the Polarizer, Retarder, and Rotator 11.4 Applications of the Jones Vector and Jones Matrices 11.5 Jones Matrices for Homogeneous Elliptical Polarizers and Retarders References Chapter 12 The Poincare´ Sphere 12.1 Introduction 12.2 Theory of the Poincare´ Sphere 12.3 Projection of the Complex Plane onto a Sphere 12.4 Applications of the Poincare´ Sphere References Chapter 13 The Interference Laws of Fresnel and Arago 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Mathematical Statements for Unpolarized Light 13.3 Young’s Interference Experiment with Unpolarized Light 13.4 The First Experiment: First and Second Interference Laws 13.5 The Second Experiment: Third Interference Law 13.6 The Third Experiment: Fourth Interference Law 13.7 The Herschel–Stokes Experiment 13.8 Summary of the Fresnel–Arago Interference Laws References Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved PART II: THE CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM THEORY OF RADIATION BY ACCELERATING CHARGES Chapter 14 Introduction to the Classical and Quantum Theory of Radiation by Accelerating Charges References Chapter 15 Maxwell’s Equations for the Electromagnetic Field References Chapter 16 The Classical Radiation Field 16.1 Field Components of the Radiation Field 16.2 Relation Between the Unit Vector in Spherical Coordinates and Cartesian Coordinates 16.3 Relation Between the Poynting Vector and the Stokes Parameters References Chapter 17 Radiation Emitted by Accelerating Charges 17.1 Stokes Vector for a Linearly Oscillating Charge 17.2 Stokes Vector for an Ensemble of Randomly Oriented Oscillating Charges 17.3 Stokes Vector for a Charge Rotating in a Circle 17.4 Stokes Vector for a Charge Moving in an Ellipse References Chapter 18 The Radiation of an Accelerating Charge in the Electromagnetic Field 18.1 Motion of a Charge in an Electromagnetic Field 18.2 Stokes Vectors for Radiation Emitted by Accelerating Charges References Chapter 19 The Classical Zeeman Effect 19.1 Historical Introduction 19.2 Motion of a Bound Charge in a Constant Magnetic Field 19.3 Stokes Vector for the Zeeman Effect References Chapter 20 Further Applications of the Classical Radiation Theory 20.1 Relativistic Radiation and the Stokes Vector for a Linear Oscillator 20.2 Relativistic Motion of a Charge Moving in a Circle: Synchrotron Radiation 20.3 Cˇerenkov Effect 20.4 Thomson and Rayleigh Scattering References Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved Chapter 21 The Stokes Parameters and Mueller Matrices for Optical Activity and Faraday Rotation 21.1 Introduction 21.2 Optical Activity 21.3 Faraday Rotation in a Transparent Medium 21.4 Faraday Rotation in a Plasma References Chapter 22 The Stokes Parameters for Quantum Systems 22.1 Introduction 22.2 Relation Between Stokes Polarization Parameters and Quantum Mechanical Density Matrix 22.3 Note on Perrin’s Introduction of Stokes Parameters, Density Matrix, and Linearity of the Mueller Matrix Elements 22.4 Radiation Equations for Quantum Mechanical Systems 22.5 Stokes Vectors for Quantum Mechanical Systems References Part III: APPLICATIONS Chapter 23 Introduction Chapter 24 Crystal Optics 24.1 Introduction 24.2 Review of Concepts from Electromagnetism 24.3 Crystalline Materials and Their Properties 24.4 Crystals 24.5 Application of Electric Fields: Induced Birefringence and Polarization Modulation 24.6 Magneto-optics 24.7 Liquid Crystals 24.8 Modulation of Light 24.9 Concluding Remarks References Chapter 25 Optics of Metals 25.1 Introduction 25.2 Maxwell’s Equations for Absorbing Media 25.3 Principal Angle of Incidence Measurement of Refractive Index and Extinction Coefficient of Optically Absorbing Materials 25.4 Measurement of Refractive Index and Extinction Coefficient at an Incident Angle of 45 References Chapter 26 Polarization Optical Elements 26.1 Introduction 26.2 Polarizers Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved 26.3 Retarders 26.4 Rotators 26.5 Depolarizers References Chapter 27 Stokes Polarimetry 27.1 Introduction 27.2 Rotating Element Polarimetry 27.3 Oscillating Element Polarimetry 27.4 Phase Modulation Polarimetry 27.5 Techniques in Simultaneous Measurement of Stokes Vector Elements 27.6 Optimization of Polarimeters References Chapter 28 Mueller Matrix Polarimetry 28.1 Introduction 28.2 Dual Rotating-Retarder Polarimetry 28.3 Other Mueller Matrix Polarimetry Methods References Chapter 29 Ellipsometry 29.1 Introduction 29.2 Fundamental Equation of Classical Ellipsometry 29.3 Classical Measurement of the Ellipsometric Parameters Psi ( ) and Delta (Á 29.4 Solution of the Fundamental Equation of Ellipsometry 29.5 Further Developments in Ellipsometry: The Mueller Matrix Representation of and Á References Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix A: Jones and Stokes Vectors B: Jones and Mueller Matrices C: Relationships Between the Jones and Mueller Matrix Elements D: Vector Representation of the Optical Field: Application to Optical Activity Bibliography Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved A Historical Note At the midpoint of the nineteenth century the wave theory of light developed by Augustin Jean Fresnel (1788–1827) and his successors was a complete triumph The wave theory completely explained the major optical phenomena of interference, diffraction, and polarization Furthermore, Fresnel had successfully applied the wave theory to the problem of the propagation and polarization of light in anisotropic media, that is, crystals A further experiment was carried out in 1851 by Armand Hypolite Louis Fizeau (1819–1896), who showed that the speed of light was less in an optically dense medium than in a vacuum, a result predicted by the wave theory The corpuscular theory, on the other hand, had predicted that in an optically dense medium the speed of light would be greater than in a vacuum Thus, in practically all respects Fresnel’s wave theory of light appeared to be triumphant By the year 1852, however, a crisis of quite significant proportions was slowly simmering in optics The crisis, ironically, had been brought on by Fresnel himself 35 years earlier In the year 1817 Fresnel, with the able assistance of his colleague Dominique Franc¸ois Arago (1786–1853), undertook a series of experiments to determine the influence of polarized light on the interference experiments of Thomas Young (1773–1829) At the beginning of these experiments Fresnel and Arago held the view that light vibrations were longitudinal At the end of their experiments they were unable to understand their results on the basis of longitudinal vibrations Arago communicated the puzzling results to Young, who then suggested that the experiments could be understood if the light vibrations were transverse, consisted of only two orthogonal components, and there was no longitudinal component Indeed, this did make some, but not all, of the results comprehensible At the conclusion of their experiments Fresnel and Arago summarized their results in a series of statements that have come down to us as the four interference laws of Fresnel and Arago All physical laws are described in terms of verbal statements from which mathematical statements can then be written (e.g., Kepler’s laws of planetary motion and Newton’s laws of motion) Fresnel understood this very well Upon completing his experiments, he turned to the problem of developing the mathematical statements for the four interference laws Fresnel’s wave theory was an amplitude description of light and was completely successful in describing completely polarized light, that is, elliptically polarized light and its degenerate states, linearly and circularly polarized light However, the Fresnel–Arago experiments were carried Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved out not with completely polarized light but with another state of polarized light called unpolarized light In order to describe the Fresnel–Arago experiments it would be necessary for Fresnel to provide the mathematical statements for unpolarized light, but much to his surprise, on the basis of his amplitude formulation of light, he was unable to write the mathematical statements for unpolarized light! And he never succeeded With his untimely death in 1827 the task of describing unpolarized light (or for that matter any state of polarized light within the framework of classical optics) along with providing the mathematical statements of the Fresnel– Arago interference laws passed to others For many years his successors were no more successful than he had been By 1852, 35 years had elapsed since the enunciation of the Fresnel–Arago laws and there was still no satisfactory description of unpolarized light or the interference laws It appeared that unpolarized light, as well as so-called partially polarized light, could not be described within the framework of the wave theory of light, which would be a crisis indeed The year 1852 is a watershed in optics because in that year Sir George Gabriel Stokes (1819–1903) published two remarkable papers in optics The first appeared with the very bland title ‘‘On the Composition and Resolution of Streams of Polarized Light from Different Sources,’’ a title that appears to be far removed from the Fresnel–Arago interference laws; the paper itself does not appear to have attracted much attention It is now, however, considered to be one of the great papers of classical optics After careful reading of his paper, one discovers that it provides the mathematical formulation for describing any state of polarized light and, most importantly, the mathematical statements for unpolarized light: the mathematical statements for the Fresnel–Arago interference laws could now be written Stokes had been able to show, finally, that unpolarized light and partially polarized light could be described within the framework of the wave theory of light Stokes was successful where all others had failed because he developed a highly novel approach for describing unpolarized and partially polarized light He abandoned the fruitless attempts of his predecessors to describe unpolarized light in terms of amplitudes and, instead, resorted to an experimental definition of unpolarized light In other words, he was led to a formulation of polarized light in terms of measured quantities, that is, intensities (observables) This was a completely unique point of view for the nineteenth century The idea of observables was not to reappear again in physics until the advent of quantum mechanics in 1925 by Werner Heisenberg (1901–1976) and later in optics with the observable formulation of the optical field in 1954 by Emil Wolf (1922– ) Stokes showed that his intensity formulation of polarized light could be used to describe not only unpolarized and partially polarized light but completely polarized light as well Thus, his formulation was applicable to any state of polarized light His entire paper is devoted to describing in all the detail of mid-nineteenth-century algebra the properties of various combinations of polarized and unpolarized light Near the end of his paper Stokes introduced his discovery that four parameters, now known as the Stokes polarization parameters, could characterize any state of polarized light Unlike the amplitude formulation of the optical field, his parameters were directly accessible to measurement Furthermore, he then used these parameters to obtain a correct mathematical statement for unpolarized light The stage had now been set to write the mathematical statements for the Fresnel–Arago interference laws Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved At the end of Stokes’ paper he turns, at long last, to his first application, the long awaited mathematical statements for the Fresnel–Arago interference laws In his paper he states, ‘‘Let us now apply the principles and formulae which have just been established to a few examples And first let us take one of the fundamental experiments by which MM Arago and Fresnel established the laws of interference of polarized light, or rather an analogous experiment mentioned by Sir John Herschel.’’ Thus, with these few words Stokes abandoned his attempts to provide the mathematical statements for the Fresnel–Arago laws At this point Stokes knew that to apply his formulation to the formulation of the Fresnel–Arago interference laws was a considerable undertaking It was sufficient for Stokes to know that his mathematical formulation of polarized light would explain them Within several more pages, primarily devoted to correcting several experiments misunderstood by his colleagues, he concluded his paper This sudden termination is remarkable in view of its author’s extraordinary effort to develop the mathematical machinery to describe polarized light, culminating in the Stokes polarization parameters One must ask why he brought his paper to such a rapid conclusion In my opinion, and this shall require further historical research, the answer lies in the paper that immediately follows Stokes’ polarization paper, published only two months later Its title was, ‘‘On the Change of the Refrangibility of Light.’’ In the beginning of this Historical Note it was pointed out that by 1852 there was a crisis in optics over the inability to find a suitable mathematical description for unpolarized light and the Fresnel–Arago interference laws This crisis was finally overcome with the publication of Stokes’ paper on polarized light in 1852 But this next paper by Stokes dealt with a new problem of very disconcerting proportions It was the first in a series of papers that would lead, 75 years later, to quantum mechanics The subject of this second paper is a topic that has become known as the fluorescence of solutions It is a monumental paper and was published in two parts The first is a 20-page abstract! The second is the paper itself, which consists of nearly 150 pages After reading this paper it is easy to understand why Stokes had concluded his paper on the Fresnel–Arago interference laws He was deeply immersed in numerous experiments exploring the peculiar phenomenon of fluorescence After an enormous amount of experimental effort Stokes was able to enunciate his now famous law of fluorescence, namely, that the wavelength of the emitted fluorescent radiation was greater than the excitation wavelength; he also found that the fluorescence radiation appeared to be unpolarized Stokes was never able to find the reason for this peculiar behavior of fluorescence or the basis of his law He would spend the next 50 years searching for the reason for his empirical law until his death in 1903 Ironically, in 1905, two years after Stokes’ death, a young physicist by the name of Albert Einstein (1879–1955) published a paper entitled ‘‘On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Generation and Conversion of Light’’ and showed that Stokes’ law of fluorescence could be easily explained and understood on the basis of the quantum hypothesis of Max Planck (1858–1947) It is now clear that Stokes never had the slightest chance of explaining the phenomenon of fluorescence within the framework of classical optics Thus, having helped to remove one of the last barriers to the acceptance of the wave theory of light, Stokes’ investigations on the nature of light had led him to the discovery of the first law ever associated with the quantum phenomenon Unknowingly, Stokes had stumbled onto the quantum Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved nature of light Thirty-five years later, in 1888, a similar chain of events was repeated when Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894), while verifying the electromagnetic field theory of James Clerk Maxwell (1831–1879), the ultimate proof of the truth of the classical wave theory of light, also discovered a new and unexplainable phenomenon, the photoelectric effect We now know that this too can be understood only in terms of the quantum theory Science is filled with ironies Within two months of the publication in March 1852 of his paper on polarized light, in which the formulation of classical optics appeared to be complete, with the May 1852 publication of his paper on fluorescence, Stokes went from complete triumph to complete dismay He would constantly return to the subject of fluorescence for the remainder of his life, always trying but never succeeding in understanding the origin of his law of fluorescence Stoke’s great paper on polarization was practically forgotten because by the mid-nineteenth century classical optics was believed to be complete and physicists had turned their attention to the investigation of the electromagnetic field and the statistical mechanics of molecules His paper was buried in the scientific literature for nearly a century Its importance was finally recognized with its ‘‘discovery’’ in the 1940s by the Nobel laureate Subrahmanya Chandrasekhar (1910– ), who used the Stokes parameters to include the effects of polarized light in the equations of radiative transfer In this book we shall see that the Stokes polarization parameters provide a rich and powerful tool for investigating and understanding polarized light and its interaction with matter The use of these parameters provides a mathematical formulation of polarized light whose power is far greater than was ever imagined by their originator and serves as a tribute to his genius Edward Collett REFERENCES Papers Stokes, G G Trans Camb Phil Soc 9, 399, 1852 Reprinted in Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol 3, p 233, Cambridge University Press, London, 1901 Stokes, G G Proc of the Royal Soc b, 195, 1852 Reprinted in Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol 3, p 259, Cambridge University Press, London, 1901 Einstein, A Ann Phys 17, 132, 1905 Heisenberg, W Zs f Phys 33, 879, 1925 Wolf, E Nuovo Cimento, 12, 884, 1954 Collett, E Amer J Phys., 39, 1483, 1971 Mulligan, J Physics Today, 42, 50, March, 1989 Books Fresnel, A J L’Oeuvres Completes, Henri de Senarmont, Emile Verdet et Leonor Fresnel, Vol I Paris, 1866 Born, M and Wolf, E Principles of Optics, 3rd ed Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, 1965 Whittaker, E A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol I Philosophical Society, New York, 1951 S Chandrasekhar, Radiative Transfer, Dover Publications, pp 24–34, New York, 1960 Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved [...]... Subrahmanya Chandrasekhar (1910– ), who used the Stokes parameters to include the effects of polarized light in the equations of radiative transfer In this book we shall see that the Stokes polarization parameters provide a rich and powerful tool for investigating and understanding polarized light and its interaction with matter The use of these parameters provides a mathematical formulation of polarized light. .. formulation for describing any state of polarized light and, most importantly, the mathematical statements for unpolarized light: the mathematical statements for the Fresnel–Arago interference laws could now be written Stokes had been able to show, finally, that unpolarized light and partially polarized light could be described within the framework of the wave theory of light Stokes was successful where all others... because he developed a highly novel approach for describing unpolarized and partially polarized light He abandoned the fruitless attempts of his predecessors to describe unpolarized light in terms of amplitudes and, instead, resorted to an experimental definition of unpolarized light In other words, he was led to a formulation of polarized light in terms of measured quantities, that is, intensities (observables)... and Newton’s laws of motion) Fresnel understood this very well Upon completing his experiments, he turned to the problem of developing the mathematical statements for the four interference laws Fresnel’s wave theory was an amplitude description of light and was completely successful in describing completely polarized light, that is, elliptically polarized light and its degenerate states, linearly and. .. Werner Heisenberg (1901–1976) and later in optics with the observable formulation of the optical field in 1954 by Emil Wolf (1922– ) Stokes showed that his intensity formulation of polarized light could be used to describe not only unpolarized and partially polarized light but completely polarized light as well Thus, his formulation was applicable to any state of polarized light His entire paper is devoted... circularly polarized light However, the Fresnel–Arago experiments were carried Copyright © 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved out not with completely polarized light but with another state of polarized light called unpolarized light In order to describe the Fresnel–Arago experiments it would be necessary for Fresnel to provide the mathematical statements for unpolarized light, but much to... unpolarized light, but much to his surprise, on the basis of his amplitude formulation of light, he was unable to write the mathematical statements for unpolarized light! And he never succeeded With his untimely death in 1827 the task of describing unpolarized light (or for that matter any state of polarized light within the framework of classical optics) along with providing the mathematical statements... By 1852, 35 years had elapsed since the enunciation of the Fresnel–Arago laws and there was still no satisfactory description of unpolarized light or the interference laws It appeared that unpolarized light, as well as so-called partially polarized light, could not be described within the framework of the wave theory of light, which would be a crisis indeed The year 1852 is a watershed in optics because... Measurement of the Ellipsometric Parameters Psi ( ) and Delta (Á 29.4 Solution of the Fundamental Equation of Ellipsometry 29.5 Further Developments in Ellipsometry: The Mueller Matrix Representation of and Á References Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix A: Jones and Stokes Vectors B: Jones and Mueller Matrices C: Relationships Between the Jones and Mueller Matrix Elements D: Vector Representation... the nineteenth century the wave theory of light developed by Augustin Jean Fresnel (1788–1827) and his successors was a complete triumph The wave theory completely explained the major optical phenomena of interference, diffraction, and polarization Furthermore, Fresnel had successfully applied the wave theory to the problem of the propagation and polarization of light in anisotropic media, that is, crystals