Detection of low grade mosaicism in turner syndrome using fluorescence in situ hybridization

DETECTION OF LOW GRADE MOSAICISM IN TURNER SYNDROME USING FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION BY ANURADHA POONEPALLI (M.B.B.S.) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology National University of Singapore 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr.Leena Gole, my supervisor, for her support, valuable time, patience and guidance throughout this study and during thesis writing. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to gain insight into the FISH technology and advice whenever I had problems. I would also like to thank my co-supervisor, Dr.Annapoorna Venkat, for her constant effort in providing samples, unfailing guidance and valuable suggestions during this study. Her ideas, advice and constructive criticisms contributed to the overall caliber of the thesis. I would also like to thank Dr.Vesna Dramusic from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and A/P Loke Kah Yin from the Department of Paediatrics for providing the patient samples, without which this study would not be completed. I am immensely thankful to Dr. M. Prakash Hande, for allowing me to continue my part- time Masters whilst working under him as a Research assistant. Special thanks to all the staff in the Cytogenetic laboratory at National University Hospital for providing their kind support, help and assistance. I would, in addition, like to thank the lab mates in Genome stability lab, Physiology for their continued help. I would also like to extend my thanks to Ms. Shen Liang for providing her expertise in helping me analyze the statistical data. Finally, I would like to thank my husband and daughter for their constant support and encouragement. And my parents for their never-ending moral support. i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY vi LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF GRAPHS xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1: Turner syndrome 6 2.2: Numerical anomalies of X chromosome leading to Turner syndrome 6 2.2.1: X chromosome monosomy 6 2.2.2: Mosaic Turner syndrome 11 2.3: 13 Structural anomalies of X chromosome 2.3.1: Isochromosome Xq [46,X,i(Xq)] 13 2.3.2: Ring X chromosome [45,X/46,X,r(X)] 13 2.3.3: Deletions of the ‘p’ or ‘q’ arms of the X chromosome i.e.46,X,del(Xp)or46,X,del(Xq) 14 ii 2.3.4: Patients with residual Y chromosome material 2.4: 2.5: 16 Clinical presentation of Turner syndrome through the different life stages 16 Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) 22 2.5.1: Probes in FISH 23 2.5.2: Commonly used fluorescent dyes 24 2.5.3: Applications of FISH 26 2.5.4: Advantages of FISH 26 2.5.5: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive tool in detecting mosaicism 27 2.6: Hypothesis of this study 28 2.7: GOALS OF THE STUDY 28 CHAPTER 3: PATIENTS AND METHODS 3.1: Patients 29 30 3.1.1: Group I: -Details of karyotypically normal patients with Turner stigmata 3.1.2: Group II: -Details of karyotypically proven Turner patients 30 33 iii 3.1.3: Group III:-Details of the control females 36 3.2: 42 Methods 3.2.1: Specimen collection 42 3.2.2: GTL (G-bands by trypsin using Leishman) banding 45 3.2.3: Dual color fluorescence in-situ hybridization 46 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS 50 4.1: Group I- Results of patients with Turner stigmata with a normal karyotype 51 4.2: Group II: Results of Turner patients with a 45,X cell line by G-banding 54 4.3: Group III -Results of the control group 58 4.4: Statistical analysis 69 4.4.1: Definition of value for low grade mosaicism 70 iv CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 73 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 84 CHAPTER 7: REFERENCES 86 CHAPTER 8: APPENDIX 96 v SUMMARY Detection of low grade mosaicism in Turner syndrome using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) Turner syndrome is a common sex chromosomal abnormality, typically presenting with premature gonadal dysgenesis and short stature. This phenotype is due to the absence of X-chromosome (45,X) in some or all cells; or due to the presence of structurally abnormal X-chromosome resulting in the haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci which escape X-inactivation. Sometimes, although the resulting phenotype is similar to those with 45,X (Hassold et al.,1988), the diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype invalidates the attempts of genotype-phenotype correlations (Ferguson-Smith,1965), which could be due to the presence of low grade mosaicism undetected by the standard cytogenetic techniques. Vice versa, the high in-utero lethality of 45,X condition has led to the hypothesis that most of the live born 45,X individuals have low frequency of normal cells which might be necessary for survival. The aims of this study were to detect the presence of low levels of monosomic X cells in karyotypically normal patients (study group I) presenting with Turner stigmata (n=11), to detect the percentage of normal 46,XX cells in karyotypically proven Turner patients (study group II) (n=17), and to investigate a control group (group III) of normal women (n=25). Based on the levels of monosomy X cells in the control group, baseline value was established and values exceeding this could then be classified as low grade mosaicism. This was achieved using the fluorescence in- situ hybridization (FISH) technique in addition to the standard cytogenetic techniques. vi Results showed a low percentage of abnormal X cells (45,X and 47,XXX) in the first group of patients ranging from 0.1%-2.74% (Mean: 1.31%, SD 1.03), which was significantly higher than that observed in the normals (p=0.003, Mann-Whitney U test). Using the ROC curve, a baseline cut-off value of 0.897% was obtained with a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 100%.The results showed that the recommended cut-off value was 1% which was obtained by rounding off the cut-off value obtained from the ROC curve analysis. Eighty-eight percent (15 out of 17) of the second group of patients (karyotypically proven Turner patients) showed normal 46,XX cells ranging from 0-95% with G-banding and FISH. The remaining 12% (2 out of 17) showed a low percent ranging from 0.06% to 0.1% of 46, XX cells only with FISH technique. Two cases remained apparent 45,X Turner with G-banding, which may be explained by tissue-confined mosaicism (Held,1993) necessitating the need to analyze cells from a different germ line or may be a consequence of a selective loss of a second cell line during embryonic development (Held et al., 1992). FISH appeared to be a more sensitive technique compared to the conventional methods in detecting low grade mosaicism and hence the use of FISH technique is suggested in such patients to enhance the diagnosis and enable genotype-phenotype correlation. vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE Table 1: TITLE Phenotypic features of X chromosome deletions with ideogram of X chromosome on the right hand side Table 2: 25 Summary of FISH results in patients with Turner stigmata with a normal karyotype Table 5: 21 Excitation and emission maxima of various fluorochromes used in multi-color FISH experiments Table 4: 15 Summary and percentage of occurrence of some of the physical findings in Turner syndrome Table 3: PAGE 51 Summary of FISH results of Turner patients with a 45,X cell line by G-banding 54 Table 6: Summary of FISH results of controls 58 Table 7: Coordinates of the ROC Curve 71 viii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE Figure 1: Classical karyotype of Turner syndrome 7 Figure 2: Normal female karyotype 7 Figure 3: Non-disjunction in meiosis 1 9 Figure 4: Non-disjunction in meiosis 2 9 Figure 5: Illustration of FISH 22 Figure 6: Xpter probe on the X chromosome 48 Figure 7: X chromosome showing the position of the Xp and Xcen probes used in the FISH experiment Figure 8: Figure 10: 49 FISH on a metaphase showing two X chromosomes with signals on the Xcentromere and the Xp-arm Figure 9: PAGE 65 FISH on interphase nuclei showing two X signals, for both centromere and Xp-arm 65 FISH on a metaphase showing a single X chromosome 66 ix Figure 11: FISH on an interphase cell showing a single X with one signal each on X centromere and on Xp-arm Figure 12: 66 FISH on interphases cells showing three signals each for the X centromere and Xp-arm 67 Figure 13: FISH on a metaphase showing an Xp deletion 67 Figure 14: FISH showing mosaicism in interphase nuclei 68 Figure 15: ROC curve 70 Figure 16: FISH on interphase nuclei showing split centromeres 81 Figure 17: FISH on interphase nucleus showing three X centromere signals 82 Figure 18: FISH on interphase nuclei showing three signals for Xp-arm and two for X centromere 83 x LIST OF GRAPHS GRAPH TITLE Graph 1: Histogram showing the percentage of monosomy PAGE X cells and trisomy X cells detected by FISH in control females undetected by the standard G- banding Graph 2: 62 Histogram showing the percentage of abnormal cells detected by FISH in study group I (patients with Turner stigmata with a normal karyotype) Graph 3: 63 Histogram showing percentage of normal and abnormal cells by FISH in the study group II (Turner patients with a 45,X cell line) 64 xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1. Introduction Turner syndrome (45,X) is a common sex chromosomal abnormality with an incidence of about 1 in 2500 liveborn female babies. Individuals with Turner Syndrome are phenotypically females with gonadal dysgenesis and somatic stigmata, like short stature, but have normal intelligence. This phenotype is due to the absence of the X-chromosome (45,X) in some or all cells; or due to the presence of a structurally abnormal Xchromosome, resulting in the haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci, which escape Xinactivation. It is estimated that 40-50% of patients with Turner syndrome demonstrate sex chromosome mosaicism (45,X/46,XX) (Magenis et al., 1980). Although the resulting phenotype is similar to those with 45,X sometimes (Hassold et al., 1988), the diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype by conventional cytogenetic technique invalidates the attempts of genotype-phenotype correlations (Ferguson-Smith, 1965). This is most probably due to the inability to detect low-grade mosaicism. Detection of low-grade mosaicism involves many factors, like the type and number of tissues analyzed, the number of cells studied and the sensitivity of the techniques applied (Hook, 1977; Procter et al., 1984; Held et al., 1992; Jacobs et al., 1997). Hence, in this study the fluorescence in-situ hybridization technique (FISH) was used in addition to the conventional cytogenetic methods, to detect the low percentage of abnormal cell lines in patients with Turner stigmata, but with a normal karyotype. Vice-versa, the high in-utero lethality of the 45,X condition has led to the hypothesis that most of the live born 45,X individuals may have a low frequency of normal cells (46,XX), 2 which might be necessary for survival. Therefore, this study also included the detection of normal 46,XX cells in typical Turner patients with a 45,X karyotype. In this study, both conventional cytogenetic techniques and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) techniques were used to analyze the chromosomes from the patient’s peripheral lymphocytes. The FISH technique has an advantage over the conventional cytogenetic methods in detecting low-grade mosaicism, as a large number of cells can be counted, and both the interphase as well as the metaphase nuclei can be analyzed. It is known that as a consequence of aging, errors occur in cell divisions, leading to the loss of the inactivated X-chromosome (Surralles et al., 1999). So a low percent of abnormal cells could also be present in normal females. To verify whether the low-grade mosaicism observed is a significant cause for the phenotype, a group of age matched fertile females (25 controls) was also studied using the same test parameters. With these controls, a baseline value can be set and the values exceeding this could then be classified as low-grade mosaicism. In general, a mosaic level of lower than 5% is considered to be low-level mosaicism (Schinzel, 1974). Conventional cytogenetic analysis needs 60 cells to be scored to exclude a 5% mosaicism at a 0.95 confidence interval (Hook, 1977). In our study we scored 100 metaphases by standard G-banding. This excluded a 3% mosaicism at 95% confidence interval. For the detection of mosaicism less than 1%, analysis of at least 500 metaphases is necessary to prove the presence of low percent abnormal clones. This is 3 very difficult to do with conventional cytogenetic methods. Therefore the same samples were analyzed by the fluorescence in-situ hybridization technique to solve this problem. The X chromosome was labeled with a dual probe containing the X centromere (DXZ1) as well as Xp terminal end (LSI STS Xp) probe. X centromeric probe (DXZ1) labeled in spectrum green and locus specific probes spanning the steroid sulfatase region (LSI STS Xp) on the Xpter labeled in spectrum orange (as an internal control) from Vysis were used. DAPI was used as a counterstain and slides were visualized under a fluorescence microscope with the appropriate filters. Evaluating 5000 cells (both metaphases and interphases) will exclude exclude mosaicism at 95% confidence interval. 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2. Literature review 2.1: Turner syndrome Dr.Henry Turner first described Turner syndrome in 1938 (Turner, 1938). It is a common sex chromosomal abnormality with an incidence of about 1 in 2500 liveborn female babies. Individuals with Turner syndrome display a female phenotype with typical features which include short stature, sexual infantilism due to rudimentary ovaries; a variety of somatic features will include micrognathia, prominent epicanthic folds, low set ears, cubitus valgus and a short and broad neck with webbing. Turner patients tend to have a high frequency of certain cardiovascular and renal abnormalities. The mental intelligence is usually normal (Lippe, 1991). This above phenotype is due to the absence of one X-chromosome leading to X-chromosome monosomy (45,X) in some or all cells or due to the presence of structurally abnormal X-chromosome resulting in the haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci situated at the level of the pseudoautosomal region of the gonosomes which escape X-inactivation (Ogata et al., 1995). 2.2: Numerical anomalies of X chromosome leading to Turner syndrome: 2.2.1: X chromosome monosomy The most common karyotype in Turner syndrome is the 45,X karyotype (45 chromosomes per cell, with only one sex chromosome) that represents 40 to 50% of cases (Fig 1), whereas the normal female karyotype is 46,XX (Fig 2). 6 Figure 1: Classical karyotype of Turner syndrome Figure 2: Normal female karyotype 7 There are two theories that try to explain this chromosomal monosomy (the loss of one of the sexual chromosomes). According to the meiotic theory, during the formation of the ovule or sperms (gametogenesis), some of them could have suffered an error and for this reason they carry one chromosome less. If the ovule or the sperm have suffered this chromosomal loss, the embryo formed from the fertilization will carry this chromosomal error. Monosomal aneuploidy is due to non-disjunction or failure of normal separation of a chromosome pair when the eggs or sperms are formed during meiosis. Normally the 46 chromosomes present in a cell are copied (replication) and paired up. The pairs of chromosomes are separated (segregation) during meiosis 1. During meiosis 2, a second division of the chromosomes occurs resulting in the formation of four sperms, or one egg and three polar bodies, each with 23 chromosomes. In the normal situation, the mature eggs and sperms are monosomic (one copy) for each chromosome. This leads to disomy (two copies of each chromosome) following fertilization. Nondisjunction can occur in meiosis 1 or meiosis 2 (Fig 3 & 4). Nondisjunction leads to the formation of two chromosomally different eggs or sperms; one has a pair of chromosomes (disomic), and the other has no chromosome (nullisomic). The former, when fertilized by a normal egg or sperm, with one copy of each chromosome (monosomic), leads to a trisomic fetus and the latter leads to a monosomic fetus. 8 Figure 3: Non-disjunction in meiosis 1 Figure 4: Non-disjunction in meiosis 2 In the mitotic theory, the loss of one of the chromosomes in the gametes (ovule or sperm) originates later, during the first period of the embryonic growth (in the first gestation 9 weeks). Anaphase lag is the mechanism where one chromosome simply fails to get incorporated into the nucleus of a daughter cell; or, a malfunction in chromosome sorting may find two identical chromosomes in the same daughter cell. This will result in mosaic Turner syndrome, which is discussed in 2.2.2. It has now been proven that the Turner syndrome is not necessarily due to the absence of entire X chromosome but is a result of haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci that escape X-inactivation. Dosage compensation in mammals has been achieved by Xchromosome inactivation to allow the female to have the same amount of X-chromosome material as the average male. Lyon hypothesized that early in the development of a normal female embryo, random inactivation of one of the two X-chromosomes in each cell occurs. This inactivation of an X chromosome requires a gene on that chromosome called XIST. XIST encodes a large molecule of RNA which accumulates along the X chromosome containing the active XIST gene and proceeds to inactivate all (or almost all) of the other hundreds of genes on that chromosome. XIST RNA does not cross over to any other X chromosome in the nucleus. Barr bodies are the inactive X chromosomes "painted" with XIST RNA (Bohorfoush et al., 1972). During the early stages of embryonic development of a normal female, the XIST locus on each of her two X chromosomes is expressed. Transcription continues on one of the X chromosomes, leading to an accumulation of XIST RNA and converting that chromosome into an inactive Barr body. Transcription of XIST ceases on the other X chromosome allowing the hundreds of other genes to be expressed. The shut-down of the XIST locus on the active X chromosome is done by methylating XIST regulatory sequences. DNA 10 methylation usually results in gene repression, so methylation permanently blocks XIST expression and permits the continued expression of all the other X-linked genes (Gartler et al., 1983). However, some genes on the X chromosome escape inactivation. These are present on the pseudoautosomal regions (PAR) of both the X and Y-chromosomes. There are about 18 genes that are identical on both X and Y chromosomes and these genes escape inactivation in females to maintain a balance with the situation in males. In addition, there are other genes on the X chromosome that are not regulated by X inactivation whose expression is thus altered in Turner syndrome as compared to normal females (Brown et al., 1990; Fisher et al., 1990). In this way, the normal female has functioning genes from one complete X-chromosome along with functioning genes from the inactivated X-chromosome. On the other hand, Turner syndrome females, with Xchromosome aneuploidy lack the genes that would normally have remained active. 2.2.2: Mosaic Turner syndrome: Fifteen to twenty percent of cases of Turner syndrome are cytogenetic mosaics with 45,X cells and clones of other cells with either 46,XX, 46,XY, 47,XXX or aberrant sexchromosome complements. These result in variants like 45,X/46,XX,45,X/47,XXX, 45,X/46,XY etc (Abulhasan et al., 1999). Chromosomal mosaicism is defined as the occurrence of 2 or more cell lines with different chromosomal make-up in an individual, developed from a single fertilized egg. Turner syndrome mosaicism is an example of monosomy mosaicism specifically for the X chromosome where, along with the normal diploid cell line, there is another cell line which has only one X chromosome instead of two (Kao et al., 1991). The cells with 11 abnormal chromosomes may be found in multiple tissues, or in just one tissue. Changes in the number or structure of chromosomes in different cells of the body can have variable impact on the proper functioning of the human body (Amiel et al., 1996). If only a tiny fraction of some tissues were involved, the aneuploidy would likely to have little effect on growth and development. However, a very minor degree of mosaicism could still be important if a crucial tissue carries the abnormal cells. As a general principle, an individual with a chromosome mosaicism in some of his or her tissues is likely to have less severe but qualitatively similar clinical features to that of someone with the nonmosaic form of the same chromosome abnormality. The mosaic pattern depends on many factors. • Mosaicism originating from an error, either in the first or second division of the fertilized egg, leads to generalized mosaicism, since most tissues of the baby are affected, often in a "patchy" way. • An error that occurs at a later stage, for example at the 64-celled blastocyst stage, will affect a smaller proportion of the cells in the baby. "Later errors" may lead to an abnormal line of cells confined to a specific area or tissue in the developing individual. Age related mosaicism: It is noted that 45,X cells are increasingly common in female blood cells as they age, but appear to have no harmful effect. 12 2.3: Structural anomalies of X chromosome: Twenty five percent of cases with 46,XX karyotype have a structural alteration of one of the X chromosomes i.e., deletions, duplications or isochromosomes. In rare cases a ring X chromosome complement can be identified. Structural X chromosome abnormalities are not unusual and occur as a result of breakages in the X chromosome with subsequent reunion of X chromosome sequences. These karyotypes include 46,X,i(Xq), 46,X,del(Xp), 46,X,del(Xq) and 45,X/46,X,r(X). The clinician must be aware of the differing susceptibilities of these various karyotypes, as the phenotype may be attributable to the limited amount of genetic material in these abnormal chromosomes (Hook et al., 1983). 2.3.1: Isochromosome Xq [46,X,i(Xq)]: This consists of the two long arms of the X-chromosome but no short distal arm (Fraser et al., 1989). It is the most common structural abnormality occurring in the Turner syndrome. The phenotype in these patients is similar to the phenotype of 45,X with perhaps an increased risk of autoimmune disorders (diabetes and thyroid disease) and is associated with deafness, but congenital abnormalities are conspicuously absent (Stratakis et al., 1994). 2.3.2: Ring X chromosome [45,X/46,X,r(X)]: Intelligence is average or above average in Turner syndrome patients, except in rare cases of tiny ring X chromosomes. Mental retardation may be present in some cases due to the inability of these abnormal chromosomes to undergo X inactivation (Atkins et al, 1966; 13 Van Duke et al 1992). Recently, some cases in which the ring is small and does not contain the X-inactivation center have been described; the phenotype is abnormal with atypical Turner syndrome stigmata and severe mental retardation, possibly due to lack of dosage compensation (Dennis et al., 1993). 2.3.3: Deletions of the ‘p’ or ‘q’ arms of the X chromosome i.e. 46,X,del(Xp) or 46,X,del(Xq): The tip of the Xp forms the meiotic pairing region and crossing over takes place in the pseudoautosomal region (PAR), which always stays active on both the chromosomes (Burgoyne, 1983). The region adjacent to this PAR on Xp22.3 contains the SHOX gene important for long bone growth, deletion of which leads to short stature. The loss of SHOX may also explain some of the skeletal features found in Turner syndrome, such as short fingers and toes, and irregular rotations of the wrist and elbow joints (Morizio et al., 2003; Ogata et al 2001). Generally loss of the entire short arm from Xp11 to Xpter leads to a full-blown Turner syndrome. The X centromere to the Xp11 region has been referred to as the active "b" region (Therman et al., 1990) and may contain genes for gonadal development (Simpson et al., 1987). The region from the X centromere to Xq13, which interestingly has never been found to be missing, contains the XIST gene that is always active on the inactive X chromosome. In long arm deletions, Madan et al., (1981) postulated the so called critical region in the Xq arm, for gonadal dysgenesis consisting of two segments, Xq13-q22 and Xq22-26, 14 separated by a short region in Xq22. Whereas loss of the Xp tip results in short stature, the tip of Xq has been postulated to have genes, loss of which lead to premature ovarian failure (Fitch et al., 1982). Surveys on various X chromosomal deletions, apart from the above mentioned characteristics show a surprising similarity in all the presenting symptoms. To explain this, a hypothesis was proposed that in Xq deleted patients the Xinactivation spreads to tip of Xp, thus inactivating the normally active X regions, hence it is the extent of X inactivation that causes the symptoms and not specific breakpoints (Sharpe et al., 2002). Table 1: Phenotypic features of X chromosome deletions with ideogram of X chromosome on the right hand side Deleted regions Ovaries Stature Somatic stigmata of Turner syndrome Short arm Xpter~p21 Normal Short None Dysgenesis Short Most or all Xqter~q22 Dysgenesis Normal None to few Xqter~q13 Dysgenesis Normal None to some All of Xq Dysgenesis Normal Several All of Xp Long arm Source: Modified from Table 13.3 of Epstein, 1986. 15 2.3.4: Patients with residual Y chromosome material: Recent molecular studies done on peripheral blood cells have shown that some individuals with 45,X and even mosaic 45,X/46,XX have residual cytogenetically undetectable Y-chromosome material by cytogenetic methods (Muller et al., 1987; Koncova et al., 1993; Shankman et al., 1995). The residual Y-chromosome material may not be present in the peripheral blood cells (Koncova et al, 1993). Thus fibroblasts and gonadal cells need to be studied if mosaicism for Y-chromosome DNA sequences is present; these patients are at increased risk for excessive virilization and increased risk of gonadoblastoma. 2.4: Clinical presentation of Turner syndrome through the different life stages: Turner syndrome embraces a broad spectrum of features with almost all patients having ovarian dysfunction, short stature, somatic and visceral abnormalities; the severity of symptoms varies considerably amongst the individuals. The phenotype is complex and multiple (Judith et al., 1995). Female phenotype is due to the absence of Y-chromosome, the testis determining gene. The clinical and presenting features of Turner syndrome change with age and can be divided into stages: embryonic period, newborn period, childhood period, adolescent period and adulthood (Hall, 1990). Embryonic and fetal life: Nearly 10% of spontaneously aborted fetuses have a 45,X karyotype and the incidence 16 has been estimated as 0.8% in zygotes, making it possibly the most common chromosomal disorder. Only 1% of human Turner zygotes survive to term. More than 9599% of 45,X conceptuses die during gestation (Simpson 1976, Hook et al., 1983). It was observed that the early mortality is much less in 46,X,i(Xq) than in 45,X cases suggesting that the loss of loci on Xp may be lethal (Hook et al., 1983). Although the period of death may extend throughout the gestation, the vast majority of 45,X conceptuses die in the first trimester with a mean developmental age of 6 weeks (Boue et al., 1976). Two explanations were considered for early death during gestation, which were not dissimilar to those regarding the lethality of autosomal aneuploidy. • One explanation was that most 45,X abortuses have such severe congenital defects that further viability is precluded (Burgoyne et al., 1983). • The other explanation is that the problem is not with the 45,X embryos and fetuses themselves but with their placentas. The aneuploid state probably interferes with the placental growth and function so that the placenta is unable to sustain a normally functioning embryo or fetus. This was suggested to be due to the compromised placental steroidogenesis, thereby leading to an inability to maintain an otherwise viable embryo and consequent spontaneous abortion (Burgoyne et al., 1983). Is mosaicism necessary for survival in Turner syndrome? The high percentage of fetal and embryonic miscarriage for karyotype 45,X points to the necessity of mosaicism for survival (Held et al., 1992, 1993). Natural selection does not 17 prevail when mosaicism is operative (Hook et al., 1983; Hassold et al., 1988), though the resulting phenotype is similar. Current hypothesis argues for the existence of a fetoprotective effect (Porter et al., 1969; Held et al., 1992) of one or more genes on the X or Y chromosome. Newborn period: The newborn may present with edema of the hands and feet, thick nuchal folds, cardiovascular malformations, like coarctation of aorta or hypoplastic heart, bicuspid aortic valve, aortic aneurysms etc., Genito-urinary abnormalities include horse-shoe kidney, silent hydronephrosis, malrotation etc., and auto-immune disorders like hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatoid arthritis may also be seen. A variety of somatic abnormalities like short neck with webbed appearance, low hairline at the back of the neck, micrognathia and low set ears are typical features of Turner syndrome. Weight and height at birth are below the mean for normal infants. Turner syndrome may be suspected in the newborn period because of a congenital heart defect that can be life threatening. Puffiness of hands and feet at birth are attributed to lymphatic obstruction and multiple pigmented nevi may be seen. Childhood period: The usual presenting feature in childhood is unexplained short stature, an invariant sign. Skeletal maturation is normal or only slightly delayed during childhood, but lags in adolescence due to sex steroid deficiency. They may also present with some of the skeletal features such as short fingers and toes, irregular rotations of the wrist and elbow 18 joints. Linear growth is attenuated in utero and statural growth lags during childhood and adolescence. Developmental problems such as speech delay and neuromotor deficits as well as learning disabilities of variable severity are common, though mental retardation (IQ[...]... filters Evaluating 5000 cells (both metaphases and interphases) will exclude exclude mosaicism at 95% confidence interval 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2 Literature review 2.1: Turner syndrome Dr.Henry Turner first described Turner syndrome in 1938 (Turner, 1938) It is a common sex chromosomal abnormality with an incidence of about 1 in 2500 liveborn female babies Individuals with Turner syndrome display... be seen A variety of somatic abnormalities like short neck with webbed appearance, low hairline at the back of the neck, micrognathia and low set ears are typical features of Turner syndrome Weight and height at birth are below the mean for normal infants Turner syndrome may be suspected in the newborn period because of a congenital heart defect that can be life threatening Puffiness of hands and feet... and absence of breast development is the common feature in Turner individuals The short stature may also be marked in adolescence Adult period: As in adolescents, the presenting features of adult women with Turner syndrome are also related to hormonal failure, which include amenorrhea, infertility and premature menopause with raised levels of luteinizing and follicle stimulating hormones In rare cases,... syndrome (King et al., 1978) Spontaneous pregnancies have also been recorded An interesting hypothesis is that mosaicism may be present in these patients at very low levels 20 Table 2: Summary and percentage of occurrence of some of the physical findings in Turner syndrome (Goldman et al., 1982; Hall et al., 1990; Gotzsche et al., 1994; Hulcrantz et al., 1994; Haddad et al., 1999) Finding Incidence... inability to detect low- grade mosaicism Detection of low- grade mosaicism involves many factors, like the type and number of tissues analyzed, the number of cells studied and the sensitivity of the techniques applied (Hook, 1977; Procter et al., 1984; Held et al., 1992; Jacobs et al., 1997) Hence, in this study the fluorescence in- situ hybridization technique (FISH) was used in addition to the conventional... FISH in study group I (patients with Turner stigmata with a normal karyotype) Graph 3: 63 Histogram showing percentage of normal and abnormal cells by FISH in the study group II (Turner patients with a 45,X cell line) 64 xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1 Introduction Turner syndrome (45,X) is a common sex chromosomal abnormality with an incidence of about 1 in 2500 liveborn female babies Individuals with Turner. .. the absence of one X-chromosome leading to X-chromosome monosomy (45,X) in some or all cells or due to the presence of structurally abnormal X-chromosome resulting in the haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci situated at the level of the pseudoautosomal region of the gonosomes which escape X-inactivation (Ogata et al., 1995) 2.2: Numerical anomalies of X chromosome leading to Turner syndrome: 2.2.1:... Non-disjunction in meiosis 1 Figure 4: Non-disjunction in meiosis 2 In the mitotic theory, the loss of one of the chromosomes in the gametes (ovule or sperm) originates later, during the first period of the embryonic growth (in the first gestation 9 weeks) Anaphase lag is the mechanism where one chromosome simply fails to get incorporated into the nucleus of a daughter cell; or, a malfunction in chromosome sorting... sorting may find two identical chromosomes in the same daughter cell This will result in mosaic Turner syndrome, which is discussed in 2.2.2 It has now been proven that the Turner syndrome is not necessarily due to the absence of entire X chromosome but is a result of haploinsufficiency of X-Y homologous loci that escape X-inactivation Dosage compensation in mammals has been achieved by Xchromosome inactivation... make-up in an individual, developed from a single fertilized egg Turner syndrome mosaicism is an example of monosomy mosaicism specifically for the X chromosome where, along with the normal diploid cell line, there is another cell line which has only one X chromosome instead of two (Kao et al., 1991) The cells with 11 abnormal chromosomes may be found in multiple tissues, or in just one tissue Changes in ... SUMMARY Detection of low grade mosaicism in Turner syndrome using fluorescence in- situ hybridization (FISH) Turner syndrome is a common sex chromosomal abnormality, typically presenting with... to detect low- grade mosaicism Detection of low- grade mosaicism involves many factors, like the type and number of tissues analyzed, the number of cells studied and the sensitivity of the techniques... maxima of various fluorochromes used in multi-color FISH experiments Table 4: 15 Summary and percentage of occurrence of some of the physical findings in Turner syndrome Table 3: PAGE 51 Summary of