Fracture and failure assessment of fatigue cracked circular hollow section x joints

FRACTURE AND FAILURE ASSESSMENT OF FATIGUE-CRACKED CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION X-JOINTS OU ZHIYONG (B. Eng. Hons.), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2013 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. ________________________ OU ZHIYONG 25 July 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis reports the research work carried out at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore. Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisors Professor Somsak Swaddiwudhipong and Assistant Professor Qian Xudong for their continuous guidance and support throughout my PhD study, for their patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and for their great personality. The knowledge and inspirations from them would benefit my whole life. My sincere thanks also goes to Professor Peter William Marshall for his valuable inputs and insightful suggestions to the research project. I thank my colleagues and friends in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering: Zhang Sufen, Wu Jun, Yang Wuchao, Chen Jian, Li Ya, Nguyen Chien Thang, Yuthdanai Petchdemaneengam, Kittikun Jitpairod, and other friends, for the meaningful discussions, friendship, and encouragements. My appreciation also goes to the lab staff in the Structural Engineering Laboratory, Koh Yian Kheng, Ang Beng Oon, Li Wei, Tan Annie, for the kind assistance in the experimental work. I would like to acknowledge research scholarship provided by the National University of Singapore and the sponsorship from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore and American Bureau of Shipping, Singapore. Above all, my family, especially my wife, have given me unending support and love, for which my mere expressions of thanks would never suffice. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . i TABLE OF CONTENTS ii SUMMARY . vii LIST OF TABLES . ix LIST OF FIGURES . xi LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS .xx Chapter Introduction . 1.1 Background and motivations . 1.2 Objectives and scopes of research 1.3 Key contributions 1.4 Outline of the thesis . Chapter Literature Review 2.1 Introduction . 2.2 Fracture mechanics fundamentals 2.2.1 Introduction . 2.2.2 Fracture mechanics theories . 2.2.2.1 Linear-elastic fracture toughness . 2.2.2.2 T-stress .13 2.2.2.3 Validity limits of linear fracture mechanics and stress intensity factor 14 2.2.2.4 Elastic-plastic fracture toughness 16 2.2.2.4.1 Non-linear elastic theory .16 2.2.2.4.2 J-integral 17 2.2.2.4.3 Crack tip opening displacement 17 2.2.2.4.4 Relationship between K, J, and CTOD 19 2.2.3 Fracture toughness test .20 2.2.3.1 Introduction 20 2.2.3.2 Fracture toughness testing standards .20 2.2.3.3 Common fracture mechanics specimens .21 2.3 Failure assessment diagram methods 23 2.3.1 Introduction 23 2.3.2 First version of the failure assessment diagram approach 24 2.3.3 Modified failure assessment diagram approach .29 2.3.4 Failure assessment hierarchy in BS7910 .32 ii 2.3.4.1 Introduction . 32 2.3.4.2 Level — simplified assessment . 32 2.3.4.3 Level — normal assessment 33 2.3.4.3.1 Level 2B: material-specific FAD . 33 2.3.4.3.2 Level 2A: generalized FAD . 38 2.3.4.4 Level — ductile tearing assessment . 39 2.3.5 Constraint effects on fracture . 41 2.3.6 Recent major updates in structural integrity assessment . 44 2.4 Tubular joints 45 2.4.1 Introduction . 45 2.4.2 Joint classification . 45 2.4.3 Basic issues regarding tubular joints 45 2.4.4 Definition of ultimate strength . 46 2.4.5 Research on tubular joints with cracks and fracture of tubular joints 48 2.5 Metallurgy of carbon steel . 50 2.5.1 Introduction . 50 2.5.2 Steel and the Fe-C phase diagram 50 2.5.3 Heat treating practices 52 2.6 Lamellar tearing . 53 2.6.1 Introduction . 53 2.6.2 Mechanism of lamellar tearing . 54 2.6.3 Factors contributing to lamellar tearing 54 Chapter Material Properties Tests 56 3.1 Introduction . 56 3.2 Tensile coupon tests for PJP+ X-joints . 57 3.2.1 Tensile coupon tests for J1-1F 57 3.2.2 Tensile coupon tests for J1X-F . 64 3.2.2.1 Tensile coupon tests in the rolling direction . 64 3.2.2.2 Tensile coupon tests in the through- thickness direction of the chord . 68 3.2.3 Tensile coupon tests for J1-2F 75 3.3 Fracture toughness tests for PJP+ X-joints . 78 3.3.1 Fracture toughness test for J1-1F 78 3.3.2 Fracture toughness test for J1X-F . 86 3.3.2.1 Fracture toughness test in the rolling direction . 86 3.3.2.2 Fracture toughness test in the through-thickness direction 89 iii 3.4 Tensile coupon tests for XN1 93 3.5 Fracture toughness tests for XN1 96 3.6 Conclusions 100 Chapter Improved Crack Length Expressions for the DC(T) and the M(T) Specimens . 101 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Improved Crack Length Expressions for the DC(T) specimens . 102 4.2.1 Introduction 102 4.2.2 ASTM E399 implementation 104 4.2.3 Finite element program . 106 4.2.4 FE Results 110 4.2.4.1 Mesh convergence 110 4.2.4.2 Crack length expression for B/W = 0.5 and υ = 0.3 for compliance measured at the crack mouth 111 4.2.4.3 Effect of Poisson’s ratio on crack mouth compliance 116 4.2.4.4 Effect of specimen thickness on crack mouth compliance . 120 4.2.4.5 Crack length expression based on load-line compliance 122 4.2.5 Summary 128 4.3 Improved Crack Length Expressions for the M(T) specimens . 129 4.3.1 Introduction 129 4.3.2 ASTM E647 implementation 130 4.3.3 Finite element program . 132 4.3.4 Results 136 4.3.4.1 Uniform stress versus uniform displacement loadings . 136 4.3.4.2 The compliance unifying parameter x for the M(T) specimen . 137 4.3.4.3 Effect of notch geometry 142 4.3.4.4 Crack length expression with B/W = 0.02 and h/W = 0.05 143 4.3.4.5 Effect of specimen thickness . 146 4.3.4.6 Effect of Poisson’s ratio 148 4.3.5 Summary 151 4.4 Conclusions 152 Chapter Residual Strength Tests of Cracked X-joints under In-plane Bending 153 5.1 Introduction 153 5.2 Residual strength test of cracked PJP+ X-joints 157 5.2.1 Test Methodologies 157 5.2.2 Instrumentations . 159 iv 5.2.3 Residual strength test of J1-1F . 162 5.2.4 Residual strength test of J1X-F 172 5.2.5 Residual strength test of J1-2F . 173 5.2.6 Residual strength test of J2-1GF 178 5.3 Residual strength test of cracked high-strength thick-walled X-joint XN1 183 5.3.1 Setup for fatigue-cracking 184 5.3.2 Fatigue-cracking procedures 186 5.3.3 Setup and instrumentation for the residual strength test of cracked XN1 187 5.3.4 XN1 residual strength test procedures 188 5.3.5 Results and discussions 189 5.3.5.1 Fatigue-cracking 189 5.3.5.2 Residual strength test . 190 5.4 Discussions 196 5.5 Conclusions . 201 Chapter Lamellar Splitting in Tubular Joints 203 6.1 Introduction . 203 6.2 Experimental program . 207 6.2.1 Geometry . 207 6.2.2 Loading . 207 6.2.3 Existing fatigue cracks . 207 6.3 Material Properties in the Rolling Direction . 209 6.3.1 Tensile Test . 209 6.3.2 Fracture Toughness 210 6.4 Lamellar Splitting Failure 213 6.5 Investigation into Lamellar Splitting 218 6.5.1 Through-Thickness Tensile Test 218 6.5.2 Through-Thickness Fracture Test . 218 6.5.3 Macroetching . 219 6.5.4 Chemical Composition . 221 6.5.5 Microscopic Examination 222 6.6 Finite Element Simulation 224 6.7 Discussions 228 6.8 Conclusions and Recommendations . 231 Chapter Failure Assessment of X-Joints 233 7.1 Introduction . 233 v 7.2 Failure assessment of a reference T-joint 235 7.2.1 Introduction 235 7.2.2 Failure assessment curve modified by crack-front constraints . 235 7.2.3 The experiment of a cracked T-joint . 237 7.2.4 Finite element modelling of T-joints . 239 7.2.5 Results 241 7.2.5.1 Assessment using the original FAD 242 7.2.5.2 Assessment using constraint-modified FAD . 246 7.2.5.3 Level 3C FAC 250 7.2.6 Discussions 250 7.2.7 Summary 254 7.3 Failure assessment of PJP+ and high-strength X-joints . 255 7.3.1 Introduction 255 7.3.2 Failure assessment for J1-1F . 255 7.3.2.1 Effect of Crack-front profile . 256 7.3.2.2 Level 2A and 2B failure assessment of J1-1F 258 7.3.3 Failure assessment for J1-XF 265 7.3.4 Failure assessment of J1-2F 270 7.3.5 Failure assessment of thick-walled joint XN1 . 272 7.3.6 Discussions and conclusions . 275 7.4 Conclusions 280 Chapter Conclusions and Future Work . 282 8.1 Introduction 282 8.2 Summary of main findings and conclusions 284 8.3 Proposed future work 288 8.3.1 Residual strength of fatigue cracked concrete-filled tubular joint 288 8.3.2 Fatigue induced lamellar splitting . 289 Appendix A: List of Publications . 290 References . 292 vi Appendix A: List of Publications Appendix A: List of Publications Journal Papers Qian, X., Li, Y., Ou, Z. Ductile tearing assessment of high-strength steel X-joints under in-plane bending. Engineering Failure Analysis, 28, 2012, p.176-191. Qian, X., Swaddiwudhipong, S., Nguyen, C.T., Petchdemaneengam, Y., Marshall, P., Ou, Z. Overload effect on the fatigue crack propagation in large-scale tubular joints. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2012, Article in press. Ou Z., Qian X. Swaddiwudhipong S. Residual strength and failure assessment of fatigue cracked large-scale X-joints under in-plane bending. Preparation in progress. Ou Z., Swaddiwudhipong S., Qian X. Improved crack length expressions for the DC(T) and the M(T) specimens. Preparation in progress. Qian X., Ou Z., Swaddiwudhipong S., Marshall P. (2012) Brittle failure caused by lamellar splitting in a large-scale tubular joint with fatigue cracks. Marine Structures. Submitted for publication. Qian X., Petchdemaneengam Y., Swaddiwudhipong S., Marshall P., Ou Z., Nguyen C. T. (2013) Fatigue performance of tubular X-joints with PJP+ welds: I – experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. Accepted for publication as at July 2013. Qian X., Nguyen C. T., Petchdemaneengam Y., Ou Z., Swaddiwudhipong S., Marshall P. (2012) Fatigue performance of tubular X-joints with PJP+ Welds: II – numerical investigation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. Accepted for publication as at July 2013. 290 Appendix A: List of Publications Conference papers Qian X., Ou Z., Swaddiwudhipong S. (2010) Failure assessment of a cracked circular hollow section T-joint including the effect of crack-front constraints. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, Hong Kong, pp. 507 – 514. Okuda S., Ou Z. (2010) Biodegradable vacuum-formed modularized shelter. New Frontiers: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA, Hong Kong, pp. 565 – 657. Ou Z., Qian X., Swaddiwudhipong S. (2009) Failure assessment of thick-walled circular hollow section joints in jack-ups. Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Civil Engineering, Thailand, pp. 47 – 50. 291 KKCNN References References 1. British Standards Institution. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures in BS7910. BSI: London. 2005. 2. ASTM International. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, ASTM E1820. West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM, 2001. 3. ASTM International. Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIC of metallic materials in ASTM E399. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2009. 4. ASTM International. Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates in ASTM E647. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2011. 5. American Petroleum Institute. Specification for steel plates for offshore structures, produced by thermo-mechanical control process (TMCP) in API Spec 2W. API: Washington, DC. 2006. 6. British Standards Institution. Weldable structural steels for fixed offshore structures - technical delivery conditions in BS EN 10225. 2009. 7. ASTM International. Standard Specification for Through-Thickness Tension Testing of Steel Plates for Special Applications in ASTM A770M-03. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2007. 8. Parsons, W.B. Engineers and engineering in the renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1939. 9. Griffith, A.A. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions, 221(Series A), 1920, p.163-198. 10. Yarema, S.Y. On the contribution of G. R. Irwin to fracture mechanics. Materials Science, 31(5), 1995, p.617-623. 11. Rooke, D.P., Cartwright, D.J. Compendium of stress intensity factors. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office, 1976. 12. Tada, H., Paris, P.C., Irwin, G.R. The stress analysis of cracks handbook. St. Louis: Paris Productions, 1985. 13. Murakami, Y. Stress intensity factors handbook. New York: Pergamon Press, 1987. 14. Anderson, T.L. Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, 1995. 15. Williams, M.L. On the stress distribution at the base of stationary crack. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24, 1957, p.109-114. 292 References 16. Larsson, S.G., Carlsson, A.J. Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 21, 1973, p.263-277. 17. Kirk, M.T., Dodds Jr, R.H., Anderson, T.L. Approximate technique for predicting size effects on cleavage fracture toughness (Jc) using the elastic T-stress. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1995, p.62-86. 18. Betegon, C., Hancock, J.W. Two parameter characterization of elastic-plastic crack tip fields. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 58, 1991, p.6. 19. Williams, J.G., Ewing, P.D. Fracture under complex stress - the angled crack problem. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, 8, 1972, p.441-446. 20. Ayatollahi, M.R., Pavier, M.J., Smith, D.J. Mode I cracks subjected to large Tstresses. International Journal of Fracture, 117(2), 2002, p.159-174. 21. Smith, D.J., Ayatollahi, M.R., Paver, M.J. The role of T-stress in brittle fracture for linear elastic materials under mixed-mode loading. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 24, 2001, p.137-150. 22. Moon, H.J., Earmme, Y.Y. Calculation of elastic T-stresses near interface crack tip under in-plane and anti-plane loading. International Journal of Fracture, 91(2), 1998, p.179-195. 23. Fett, T. Stress intensity factors and T-stress for single and double-edge-cracked circular disks under mixed boundary conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(1), 2002, p.69-83. 24. Su, R.K.L., Sun, H.Y. A brief note on elastic T-stress for centred crack in anisotropic plate. International Journal of Fracture, 131(1), 2005, p.53-58. 25. Molla-Abbasi, K., Schutte, H. On the full set of elastic T-stress terms of internal elliptical cracks under mixed-mode loading conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75(6), 2008, p.1545-1568. 26. Rice, J.R. A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of stress concentration by notches and cracks. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 35, 1968, p.379-386. 27. Rice, J.R. Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture Fracture, an advanced treatise vol.2. London, UK: Academic Press, 1968, p.192-308. 28. Wells, A.A. Unstable crack propagation in metals: cleavage and fast fracture. In Proceedings of the Crack Propagation Symposium. Cranfield, UK, vol. 1, paper 84, 1961. 29. Shih, C.F. Relationships between the J-Integral and the crack opening displacement for stationary and extending cracks. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 29(4), 1981, p.305-326. 293 References 30. Hutchinson, J.W. Plastic stress and strain fields at a crack tip. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 16(5), 1968, p.337-342. 31. Rice, J.R., Rosengren, G.F. Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a powerlaw hardening material. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 16(1), 1968, p.1-12. 32. ASTM International. Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness in ASTM E1820. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2011. 33. ASTM International. Standard test method for plane-strain (chevron-notch) fracture toughness of metallic materials in ASTM E1304. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2008. 34. ASTM International. Standard practice for fracture testing with surface-crack tension specimens in ASTM E740. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2010. 35. ASTM International. Standard test method for crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) fracture toughness measurement in ASTM E1290. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2008. 36. British Standards Institution. Fracture mechanics toughness tests — part 1: method for determination of KIc, critical CTOD and critical J values of metallic materials in BS 7448-1:1991. BSI: London. 2002. 37. British Standards Institution. Fracture mechanics toughness tests — part 2: method for determination of KIc, critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials in BS 7448-2:1997. BSI: London. 1997. 38. British Standards Institution. Fracture mechanics toughness tests — part 3: method for determination of fracture toughness of metallic material at rates of increase in stress intensity factor greater than 3.0 MPa∙ 0.5s-1 in BS 7448-3:2005. BSI: London. 2005. 39. British Standards Institution. Fracture mechanics toughness tests — part 4: method for determination of fracture curves and initiation values for stable crack extension in metallic materials in BS 7448-4:1997. BSI: London. 2001. 40. International Standards Organisation. Metallic materials – unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness in ISO 12135. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland. 2002. 41. European Structural Integrity Society. Procedure for determining the fracture behaviour of materials in ESIS P2-92. ESIS: Torino. 1992. 42. European Structural Integrity Society. Unified procedure for determining the fracture behavior of materials in ESIS P3-05D. ESIS: Torino. 2005. 43. Dowling, A.R., Townley, C.H.A. The effect of defects on structural failure. A two-criteria approach. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 3(2), 1975, p.77-107. 294 References 44. Harrison, R.P., Loosemore, K., Milne, I. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects in R/H/R6. Central Electricity Generating Board: London. 1976. 45. British Energy Generation. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects in R6. BEG: Gloucester. 2001. 46. Harrison, R.P., Loosemore, K., Milne, I. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects in R/H/R6 - Revision 1. Central Electricity Generating Board: London. 1977. 47. Harrison, R.P., Loosemore, K., Milne, I. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects in R/H/R6 - Revision 2. Central Electricity Generating Board: London. 1980. 48. Bloom, J.M. A procedure for the assessment of the structural integrity of nuclear pressure-vessels. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme, 105(1), 1983, p.28-34. 49. Bloom, J.M. Validation of a deformation plasticity failure assessment diagram approach to flaw evaluation. In Elastic-Plastic Fracture: Second symposium, Volume II - Fracture Resistance Curves and Engineering Applications, ASTM STP 803, 1983. 50. Ainsworth, R.A. The assesssment of defects in structures of strain-hardening material. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 19(4), 1984, p.633-642. 51. Kumar, V., German, M.D., Shih, C.F. An engineering approach for elastic-plastic fracture analysis in Electric Power Research Institute Report NP-1931: Palo Alto, California. 1981. 52. Miller, A.G., Ainsworth, R.A. Consistency of numerical results for power-law hardening materials and the accuracy of the reference stress approximation for J. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 32(2), 1989, p.233-247. 53. Milne, I., Ainsworth, R.A., Dowling, A.R., Stewart, A.T. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 32, 1988, p.3-104. 54. Milne, I., Ainsworth, R.A., Dowling, A.R., Stewart, A.T. Background to and validation of CEGB report R/H/R6 - revison 3. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 32(Compendex), 1988, p.105-196. 55. Milne, I. Failure analysis in the presence of ductile crack growth. Materials Science and Engineering, 39(1), 1979, p.65-79. 56. Hackett, E.M., Schwalbe, K.-H., Dodds, R.H. eds. Constraint effects in fracture. ASTM STP 1171. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1993. 57. Kirk, M., Bakker, A. eds. Constraint effects in fracture, theory and applications: second volume. ASTM STP 1244, ed. . West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995. 295 References 58. Zerbst, U., Heerens, J., Schwalbe, K.H. Estimation of lower bound fracture resistance of pressure vessel steel in the transition regime. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 16(11), 1993, p.1147-1160. 59. Cardew, G.E., Goldthorpe, M.R., Howard, I.C., Kfouri, A.P. On the Elastic TTerm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 60. Hancock, J.W., Reuter, W.G., Parks, D.M. Contraint and toughness parameterized by T. In Symposium on Constraint Effects in Fracture, May 8, 1991 - May 9, 1991. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Publ by ASTM, 1993. 61. O'Dowd, N.P., Shih, C.F. Family of Crack-tip Fields Characterized by a Triaxiality Parameter. I. Structure of Fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 39(Copyright 1992, IEE), 1991, p.989-1015. 62. O'Dowd, N.P., Shih, C.F. Family of Crack-tip Fields Characterized by a Triaxiality Parameter. II. Fracture applications. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 40(Copyright 1992, IEE), 1992, p.939-963. 63. Ainsworth, R.A. A constraint-based failure assessment diagram for fracture assessment. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 64(3), 1995, p.277-285. 64. American Petroleum Institute. Fitness-for-service in API 579. API: Washington, DC. 2007. 65. SINTAP. Structural integrity assessment procedure. Final report. EU-project BE 95-1462. Brussels: Brite Euram Programme. 1999. 66. FITNET. European fitness for service network. FITNET Final technical report (Version: 27 Nov. 06): GKSS Research Center. 2006. 67. American Petroleum Institute. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms - working stress design in API RP2A-WSD 22nd Ed. Washington, DC: Washington, DC. 2006. 68. Kurobane, Y., Ogawa, K., Ochi, K., Makino, Y. Local buckling of braces in tubular K-joints. Thin-Walled Structures, 4(1), 1986, p.23-40. 69. Kurobane, Y., Makino, Y., Ochi, K. Ultimate resistance of unstiffened tubular joints. Journal of Structural Engineering, 110(2), 1984, p.385-400. 70. Makino, Y., Kurobane, Y., Ochi, K., van der Vegte, J., Wilmshurst, S.R. Introduction to unstiffened chs tubular joint database in Tubular structures VI: Proceedings of the Sixth international Symposium on Tubular Structures: Melbourne. 1996. 71. Yura, J.A., Zettlemoyer, N., Edwards, I.F. Ultimate capacity of circular tubular joints. ASCE J Struct Div, 107(10), 1981, p.1965-1984. 72. Lu, L.H., Dewinkel, G.D., Yu, Y., Wardenier, J. Deformation limit for the ultimate strength of hollow section joints. Rotterdam: A a Balkema, 1994. 296 References 73. Choo, Y.S., Qian, X.D., Liew, J.Y.R., Wardenier, J. Static strength of thick-walled CHS X-joints - Part I. New approach in strength definition. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 59(10), 2003, p.1201-1228. 74. Zhao, X.L. Verification of the Deforamtion limit for T-joints in cold-formed RHS sections in Tubular structures VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Tubular Structures: Miskolc. 1996. 75. Callister, W.D. Material science and engineering: an introduction. 7th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2007. 76. Krauss, G. Steels: heat treatment and processing principles. Ohio: ASM International, 1990. 77. Australian Welding Research Association. Control of lamellar tearing in Technical Note 6. AWRA: Milsons Point, N.S.W. 1976. 78. Qian, X., Yuthdanai, P., Swaddiwudhipong, S., Marshall, P.W., Ou, Z., Nguyen, C.T. Fatigue Performance of Tubular X-Joints with PJP+ Welds: I – Experimental Study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Submitted for publication, p. 79. ASTM International. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials in ASTM E8M. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2004. 80. Yoder, G.R., Cooley, L.A., Crooker, T.W. Procedures for Precision Measurement of Fatigue-Crack-Growth-Rate Using Crack-Opening-Displacement Techniques in Fatigue Crack Growth Measurements and Data Analysis, ASTM STP 738: United States. 1981. p.85-102. 81. Shang-Xian, W. Crack length calculation formula for three point bend specimens. International Journal of Fracture, 24(1), 1984, p.R33-R38. 82. Kapp, J.A., Leger, G.S., Gross, B. Wide-range displacement expressions for standard fracture mechanics specimens. In Fracture Mechanics: Sixteenth Symposium. Columbus, OH, USA: ASTM, 1985. 83. Bucci, R.J., Paris, P.C., Landes, J.D., Rice, J.R. J integral estimation procedures. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1972, p.40-69. 84. Toshiro, K., Isamu, Y., Mitsuo, N. Evaluation of dynamic fracture toughness parameters by instrumented Charpy impact test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 24(5), 1986, p.773-782. 85. Brüninghaus, K., Falk, J., Twickler, M., Dahl, W. Determination of crack resistance curves under static and dynamic loading by analysis of load displacement relationship. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 34(4), 1989, p.9891000. 86. Wong, R., Herrera, R., Zhou, Z., Landes, J.D. Development of J-R curves from obsolete data using normalization techniques. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 37(1), 1990, p.153-161. 297 References 87. Sharobeam, M.H., Landes, J.D. The load separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics. International Journal of Fracture, 47(2), 1991, p.81104. 88. Byun, T.S., Lee, B.S., Yoon, J.H., Hong, J.H. Iteration method for directly determining J-resistance curves of nuclear structural steels. Journal of Materials Science, 34(9), 1999, p.2039-2047. 89. Newman Jr, J.C. Stress-intensity factors and crack-opening displacements for round compact specimens. International Journal of Fracture, 17(6), 1981, p.567578. 90. Feddern, G.V., Macherauch, E. A new specimen shape for fracture mechanics experiments. Z. Metallkunde, 64, 1973, p.882-884. 91. Mowbray, D.F., Andrews, W.R. Stress-intensity factor calibration for a compact specimen with a round profile in General electric technical information series No. 74SL235. 1975. 92. James, L.A., Mills, W.J. An evaluation of the round compact specimen for fatigue crack growth rate testing in Fatigue crack growth measurement and data analysis. ASTM STP 738, Hudak Jr, S.J., Bucci, R.J. Editors. 1981. 93. Cull, A.D., Starrett, H.S. A study of fracture mechanics for graphite materials in Air Force Materials Laboratory. AFML-TR-75-125. United States. 1975. 94. Gross, B. Mode I analysis of a cracked circular disk subject to a couple and a force. Dev in Theor and Appl Mech, 9, 1978, p.195-203. 95. Gregory, R.D. The edge-cracked circular disc under symmetric pin-loading. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 85(03), 1979, p.523-538. 96. Newman Jr, J.C. An improved method of collocation for the stress analysis of crack plates with various shaped boundaries in NASA Langley Research Centre, Technical Note, NASA TN D-6376, Washington. 1971. 97. Newman Jr, J.C. Stress analysis of the compact specimen including the effects of pin loading in Fracture Analysis. ASTM STP 560:105-121. 1974. 98. Kapp, J.A. Improved wide range experssions for displacements and inverse displacements for standard fracture toughness specimens. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 19(1), 1991, p.45-54. 99. Tobler, R.L., Carpenter, W.C. A numerical and experimental verification of compliance functions for compact specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21(3), 1985, p.547-556. 100. Saxena, A., Hudak Jr, S.J. Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens. International Journal of Fracture, 14(5), 1978, p.453-468. 298 References 101. Dassault Systèmes. Abaqus User Manual. Vélizy-Villacoublay, France, 2010. 102. Eftis, J., Liebowitz, H. On the modified Westergaard equations for certain plane crack problems. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, 8(4), 1972, p.383392. 103. Fisher, D.M., Buzzard, R.J. Comparison tests and experimental compliance calibration of the proposed standard round compact plane strain fracture toughness specimen in NASA TM-81379. 1979. 104. MATLAB. MATLAB R2010b documentation, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA. 2010. 105. Kirk, M.T. Compliance expression for the middle cracked tension specimen: 2a/W = f(EBV/P). Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 15(6), 1987, p.337-341. 106. Ashbaugh, N.E., Johnson, D.A. Determination of crack length as a function of compliance and gage length for an M(T) Specimen. ASTM Research Report RR: E24-1017. ASTM International, 1992. 107. Koiter, W.T. Note on the stress intensity factors for sheet strips with cracks under tensile loads. Report No. 314, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological University, Delft, The Netherlands, 1965. 108. Liebowitz, H., Eftis, J. On nonlinear effects in fracture mechanics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 3(Compendex), 1971, p.267-281. 109. Wheeler, C., Eastabrook, J.N., Rooke, D.P., Schwalbe, K.H., Setz, W., De Koning, A.U. Recommendations for the measurement of r-curves using centre-cracked panels. Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 17(4), 1982, p.205-213. 110. t Hart, W.G.J., Schra, L. Residual Strength of Damage Tolerant AluminumLithium Sheet Materials in NLR TP 92439 U. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam: Netherlands. 1992. p.68p. 111. Schijve, J. Some considerations on the Eftis-Liebowitz equation for the COD compliance of a center cracked sheet specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 55(3), 1996, p.341-346. 112. Neale, B.K. The fracture toughness testing of centre-cracked tensile specimens using the unloading compliance technique. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 59(4), 1998, p.487-499. 113. Lei, Y., Neale, B.K. The fracture behaviour of a centre cracked tensile specimen. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 20(2), 1997, p.201-216. 114. Norsok Standard. N-004 - Design of steel structures in Rev. 2,. Norsok Standard. 2004. 115. International Standards Organisation. Petroleum and natural gas industries - fixed steel offshore structures in ISO 19902. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland. 2007. 299 References 116. International Institute of Welding. Static design procedure for welded hollow section joints - recommendations in IIW Doc.-XV-1329-09. IIW: Paris. 2009. 117. Kurobane, Y., Makino, Y., Sagawa, M. Low cycle fatigue research on tubular Kjoints in IIW Doc XV-291-70, International Institute of Welding. 1970. 118. Gibstein, M.B. Fatigue strength of welded tubular joints tested at DNV laboratories in Proceedings of the International Conference on Steel in Marine Structures, Paper No. 8.5: Paris. 1981. 119. Gibstein, M.B., Moe, E.T. Brittle fracture risks in tubular joints. In Fifth International Symposium on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Tokyo, Japan: ASME, 1986. 120. Machida, S., Hagiwara, Y., Kajimoto, K. Evaluation of brittle fracture strength of tubular joints of offshore structures. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 3, 1987, p.231-237. 121. Skallerud, B., Eide, O.L., Berge, S. Ultimate capacity of cracked tubular joints: comparison between numerical simulations and experiments. In 7th International Conference on the Behaviour of Offshore Structures. Boston, 1994. 122. Burdekin, F.M., Frodin, J.G. Ultimate strength of cracked tubular joints in Final Report Project DA709. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, UMIST. 1987. 123. Cheaitani, M.J. Ultimate strength of cracked and uncracked tubular K joints. Welding Research Abroad, 42(2), 1996, p.8-25. 124. Hadley, I., Dyer, A.P., Booth, G.S., Cheaitani, M.J., Burdekin, F.M., Yang, G.J. Static strength of cracked tubular joints: new data and models. In 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: ASME, 1998. 125. Klasen, B., Wastberg, S., Moe, E.T. Failure assessment diagram method for tubular joints in DNV Technical Report 96-3012. 1996. 126. Ting, K.T., Moffat, D.G. Static strength of cracked DT tubular joints under out of plane bending moment in Department of Engineering Report A/170/95, University of Liverpool. 1995. 127. Zerbst, U., Heerens, J., Schwalbe, K.-H. The fracture behaviour of a welded tubular joint--an ESIS TC1.3 round robin on failure assessment methods: Part I: experimental data base and brief summary of the results. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(10), 2002, p.1093-1110. 128. Talei-Faz, B., Brennan, F.P., Dover, W.D. Residual static strength of high strength steel cracked tubular joints. Marine Structures, 17(3-4), 2004, p.291-309. 300 References 129. Cheaitani, M.J., Burdekin, F.M. Ultimate strength of cracked tubular joints. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, Tubular Structures VI. Melbourne, Australia, 1994. 130. Stacey, A., Sharp, J.V., Nichols, N.W. Static strength assessment of cracked tubular joints. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Florence, Italy: ASME, 1996. 131. Health and Safety Executive. Static strength of cracked tubular joints: new data and models in Ofshore techonology Report, OTC 1999 054. HSE Books: London. 1999. 132. Burdekin, F.M. The static strength of cracked joints in tubular members in Ofshore techonology Report, OTC 2001 080. HSE Books: London. 2002. 133. Wang, X., Wu, J.F., Qian, X. Crack driving force and ultimate strength of thickwalled CHS X-joints with near-toe cracks. In 21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE-2011. Maui, HI, 2011. 134. Qian, X., Choo, Y.S., Van Der Vegte, G.J., Wardenier, J. Evaluation of the new IIW CHS strength formulae for thick-walled joints. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, Tubular Structures XIII. Shanghai, China, 2008. 135. Health and Safety Executive. Offshore installations: guidance on design, construction, and certification in 4th ed. 3rd Amendment. HSE Books: London. 1995. 136. Farrar, J.C.M., Dolby, R.E. Lamellar tearing in welded steel fabrication. London: Cambridge: Welding Institute, 1972. 137. Feld, J., Carper, K.L. Construction failure. New York: John Wiley, 1996. 138. Takeshi, Y. Lamellar tearing and marine structures. Welding and Metal Fabrication, 43(10), 1975, p.740-746. 139. Watanabe, M. The pull-out type fracture in rolled steel plates in Welding in Shipbuilding. The Institute of Marine Engineering: London. 1961. p.219-225. 140. Schoenherr, W. On the tendency of steels to lamellar tearing in welded constructions. Ver Dtsch Eisenhuettenleute: Munich, W Ger. 1973. 141. Wilson, W.G. Minimizing lamellar tearing by improving Z-direction ductility. Welding Journal, 53(11), 1974, p.691-695. 142. Oates, R.P., Stout, R.D. uantitative weldability test for susceptibility to lamellar tearing. Welding Journal, 52(11), 1973, p.481-491. 143. Farrar, J.C.M. Inclusions and susceptibility to lamellar tearing of welded structural steels. Welding Journal, 53(8), 1974, p.321-331. 301 References 144. Ganesh, S., Stout, R.D. Material variables affecting lamellar tearing susceptibility in steels. Welding Journal, 55(11), 1976, p.341-355. 145. Kaufmann, E.J., Pense, A.W., Stout, R.D. Evaluation of factors significant to lamellar tearing. Welding Journal, 60(3), 1981, p.43s-49s. 146. Girenko, V.S., Bernatskii, A.V., Rabkina, M.D., Korzhova, N.P. Lamellar, lamellar-brittle, and lamellar-ductile failure of welded joints. Strength of Materials, 19(3), 1987, p.372-378. 147. Farrar, J.C.M., Dolby, R.E. An investigation into lamellar tearing. Metallurgical Transactions, 1, 1969, p.32-39. 148. Farrar, J.C.M., Dolby, R.E., Baker, R.G. Lamellar tearing in welded structural steels. Welding Journal, 48(7), 1969, p.S274-&. 149. Meyer, H.J. Influence of defects in plates on weld failure under stress perpendicular to the plate surface in Proceedings of the 2nd. Conference on the significance of defects in welds. The Welding Institute: London. 1968. 150. Elliot, D.N. Lamellar tearing in multipass fillet joints. Welding Journal, 48, 1969, p.409-416. 151. Nicholls, D.M. Lamellar tearing in hot rolled steel. British Welding Journal, 15, 1968, p.103-112. 152. Jubb, J.E.M. Lamellar tearing in Welding Research Council Bulletin 168. 1971. 153. Farrar, J.C.M., Ginn, B.J., Dolby, R.E. Use of small-scale destructive tests to assess susceptibility to lamellar tearing. Proceedings of International Conference on Welding in Offshore Constructions, 1974, p.96-113. 154. Wold, G., Kristoffersen, T., Veritas, D.n. Development of method for measuring susceptibility of steel plate to lamellar tearing in Offshore Technology Conference: Houston, Texas. 1973. 155. British Standards Institution. Steel products with improved deformation properties perpendicular to the surface of the product - Technical delivery conditions in BS EN 10164 2004. 156. Kopadia, B.M., English, A.T., Backofen, W.A. Influence of mechanical fibering on brittle fracture in hot rolled steel plate. ASM Transactions, 55, 1962, p.289-398. 157. Almond, E. Delamination in banded steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1(7), 1970, p.2038-2041. 158. Lentz, D.F. Factors contributing to split fractures. Mech Work and Steel Process Conf, 16th, Proc, Dolton, 1974, p.397-412. 159. Hero, H., Evensen, J., Embury, J.D. The occurrence of delamination in a control rolled HSLA steel. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 14(2), 1975, p.117-122. 302 References 160. Brozzo, P., Buzzichelli, G. Effect of plastic anisotropy on the occurrence of "separations" on fracture surfaces of hot-rolled steel specimens. Scripta Metallurgica, 10(3), 1976, p.235-240. 161. DeArdo, A.J. An investigation of the mechanism of splitting which occurs in tensile specimens of high strength low alloy steels. Metallurgical Transactions A, 8(3), 1977, p.473-486. 162. Ryall, J.E., Williams, J.G. Fracture surface separations in the Charpy V-notch test. BHP Technical Bulletin, 22(2), 1978, p.38-45. 163. Salama, M.M. Through-thickness properties of TMCP steels. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 126(4), 2004, p.346-349. 164. Yang, M., Chao, Y.J., Li, X., Tan, J. Splitting in Dual-Phase 590 high strength steel plates. Part I. Mechanisms. Materials Science and Engineering A, 497(1-2), 2008, p.451-461. 165. Schofield, R., Rowntree, G., Sarma, N.V., Weiner, R.T. "Arrowhead" fractures in controlled-rolled pipeline steels. Met Technol, 1, 1974, p.325-331. 166. Dabkowski, D.S., Konkol, P.J., Baldy, M.F. "Splitting-type" fractures in highstrength line-pipe steels. Metals Engineering Quarterly, 16(1), 1976, p.22-32. 167. Iino, M., Mimura, H., Nomura, N. On delamination in line-pipe steels. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn, 17(8), 1977, p.450-458. 168. Toribio, J. Delamination fracture of prestressing steel: An engineering approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75(9), 2008, p.2683-2694. 169. Inoue, T., Yin, F., Kimura, Y., Tsuzaki, K., Ochiai, S. Delamination effect on impact properties of ultrafine-grained low-carbon steel processed by warm caliber rolling. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 41(2), 2010, p.341-355. 170. Dogan, M. Delamination failure of steel single angle sections. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(7), 2011, p.1800-1807. 171. Yasniy, P.V., Maruschak, P.O., Panin, S.V., Bischak, R.T., Vuherer, T., Ovechkin, B.B., Panin, V.E. Temperature effect on impact fracture of 25CrlMolV ferritepearlite steel. Physical Mesomechanics, 14(3), 2011, p.185-194. 172. Jafari, M., Kimura, Y., Tsuzaki, K. Enhanced upper shelf energy by ultrafine elongated grain structures in 1100MPa high strength steel. Materials Science and Engineering A, 532, 2012, p.420-429. 173. Bramfitt, B.L., Marder, A.R. Study of the delamination behavior of a very lowcarbon steel. Metallurgical Transactions A, A(8), 1977, p.1263-1273. 303 References 174. Bramfitt, B.L., Marder, A.R. Splitting behavior in plate steels. In Toughness Characterization and Specification for HSLA and Structural Steels: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1977. 175. ASTM International. Standard terminology relating to fatigue and fracture testing in ASTM E1823. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2011. 176. Morrison, J., Wu, X. The toughness transition curve of a ship steel. In From Charpy To Present Impact Testing: European Structural Integrity Society, 2002. 177. Silva, M.C., Hippert, E., Ruggieri, C., Asme. Experimental investigation of ductile tearing properties for API X70 and X80 pipeline steels. Vol. 6. 2005. 178. ASTM International. Standard test method for atomic emission vacuum spectrometric analysis of carbon and low-alloy steel in ASTM E415. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2008. 179. Kiessling, R., Lange, N. Non-metallic inclusions in steel. Vol. 2. London: Iron and Steel Institute, 1965. 180. FEACrack. User's Manual Version 3.2. Structural Reliability Technology, 2009. 181. PATRAN. Patran User's Manual 2011. MSC Software, 2011. 182. Qian, X., Dodds Jr, R.H., Choo, Y.S. Elastic-plastic crack driving force for tubular X-joints with mismatched welds. Engineering Structures, 27(9), 2005, p.14191434. 183. Qian, X., Dodds Jr, R.H., Choo, Y.S. Mode mixity for circular hollow section X joints with weld toe cracks. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 127(3), 2005, p.269-279. 184. American Petroleum Institute. Preproduction qualification for steel plates for offshore structures in API RP 2Z 4th Ed. API: Washington, DC. 2005. 185. ASTM International. Standard specification for straight-beam ultrasonic examination of rolled steel plates for special applications in ASTM A578M. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA. 2007. 186. Sanders, D.H., Yura, J.A. Strength of double-tee tubular joints in tension. IN: OTC 87, PROC. NINETEENTH ANNUAL OFFSHORE TECHNOL. CONF., (HOUSTON, U.S.A.: APR. 27-30, 1987), , Richardson, U.S.A., Offshore Technol. Conf., 1987, Paper OTC 5437, 1987, p.139-150. 187. Van der Vegte, G.J. The static strength of uniplanar and multiplanar tubular T and X joints. Delft University of Technology. PhD thesis, 1995. 188. Choo, Y.S., Chen, Z., Wardenier, J., Gronbech, J. Static strength of simple and grouted tubular X-joints subjected to in-plane bending. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, 2, 2007, p.183-194. 304 References 189. Dexter, E.M., Lee, M.M.K. Static strength of axially loaded tubular K-joints. I: Behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(2), 1999, p.194-201. 190. Van Der Vegte, G.J., Makino, Y., Wardenier, J. The effect of chord pre-load on the static strength of uniplanar tubular K-joints. Kitakyushu, 2002. 191. Qian, X.D., Choo, Y.S., Liew, J.Y.R., Wardenier, J. Simulation of ductile fracture of circular hollow section joints using the Gurson model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(5), 2005, p.768-780. 192. Qian, X., Marshall, P. Unzipping analysis of a full-scale offshore structure connection. Singapore, 2007. 193. Burdekin, F.M. The fracture behaviour of a welded tubular joint - an ESIS TC1-3 round robin on failure assessment methods part III-UK BS7910 methodology. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(10), 2002, p.1119-1127. 194. Marshall, G.W., Ainsworth, R.A. The fracture behaviour of a welded tubular joint - An ESIS TCI.3 round robin on failure assessment methods part II: R6 analysis. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(10), 2002, p.1111-1118. 195. Lie, S.T., Yang, Z.M. BS7910:2005 failure assessment diagram (FAD) on cracked circular hollow section (CHS) welded joints. Advanced Steel Construction, 5(4), 2009, p.406-420. 196. Cravero, S., Ruggieri, C. Structural integrity analysis of axially cracked pipelines using conventional and constraint-modified failure assessment diagrams. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 83(8), 2006, p.607-617. 197. Zhu, X.K., Jang, S.K. J-R curves corrected by load-independent constraint parameter in ductile crack growth. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 68(3), 2001, p.285-301. 198. Zhu, X.K., Joyce, J.A. J-Resistance curve testing of HY80 steel using SE(B) specimens and normalization method. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 74(14), 2007, p.2263-2281. 199. Healy, B., Gullerud, A., Koppenhoefer, K., Roy, A., RoyChowdhury, S., Walters, M., Bichon, B., Cochran, K., Carlyle, A., Dodds Jr, R.H. WARP3D-Release 16.2. University of Illinois, 2012. 200. CRACKWISE 4. Fitness-for-Purpose Weld Flaw Assessment. TWI software, 2011. 201. Morahan, D.J., van Foeken, R.J., Lalani, M., Wardenier, J. New data on the fatigue and ultimate limit state of grouted tubular joints. Houston, TX, USA: Offshore Technol Conf, 1996. 305 [...]... 7.7: Key fracture toughness values in the two directions of J1-XF chord 266 Table 7.8: J1-XF level 2 and level 3C failure assessment results 269 Table 7.9: J1-2F level 2 failure assessment results 272 Table 7.10: XN1 failure assessment results 274 Table 7.11: Comparison of failure assessment results for fractured X- joints by level 2A, 2B, and 3C curves with J = Jmax ... residual strength test of cracked XN1 188 Figure 5.45: Fatigue crack initiation at the notch front of XN1 189 xvi Figure 5.46: illustration of fatigue crack profile in XN1 189 Figure 5.47: Load-displacement behaviour of XN1 192 Figure 5.48: (a) the amount of crack extension and the crack-front profile before and after ductile crack extension; (b) a typical post-test sectioned piece showing... of fatigue cracks might reduce the strength and ductility of the joints and even lead to fracture failure There has been limited research in the residual strength of fatigue- cracked tubular joints with the experimental data still in scarcity In the present study, five fatigue cracked large-scale circular hollow section Xjoints with different surface crack profiles at the weld toe were tested under in-plane... BS7910 [1] failure assessment procedures for the assessment of fatigue- cracked CHS X- joints under in-plane bending through both experimental investigations and numerical simulations, and develop safe failure assessment procedures for CHS X- joints under in-plane bending The BS7910 [1] procedures integrate fracture toughness properties and tensile properties obtained from small-scale specimens to the assessment. .. Comparison of the fracture resistance curve in the X and Z direction 219 xvii Figure 6.11: (a) An etched section of a typical un-damaged segment in J 1X- F; (b) an etched section containing fatigue crack and lamellar splitting; (c) micro cavities at the mid-thickness of (b); (d) a magnified view of (c) 220 Figure 6.12: SEM images of J 1X- F chord material: (a) an un-etched piece in the transverse section. .. distinct appearance of the ductile tearing surface; (d) chord fatigue crack view from the cross section of the sectioned joint 168 Figure 5.14: Comparison of ACPD measurements against the actual fatigue crack profile 168 xv Figure 5.15: Chord fatigue crack profile at the right brace-to-chord intersection of J1-1F 169 Figure 5.16: Chord fatigue crack profile at the... 7.29: SIF along the chord crack of J1-2F 271 Figure 7.30: Level 2 assessment for J1-2F 271 Figure 7.31: FE model for XN1 273 Figure 7.32: SIF along the crack-front of chord crack of XN1 274 Figure 7.33: Failure assessment for XN1 274 Figure 7.34: Potential influence of the new fracture toughness limit in E1820 279 xix LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Symbol Definition... tubular joints is the lack of crack driving force solutions for complex structures like tubular joints The work presented in this thesis fills up the void in experimental data and applies the FAD concept in assessing large-scale fatigue crack X- joints through both experimental study and finite element simulations 1.2 Objectives and scopes of research The purpose of this research is to investigate the standard... extension; and (c) definition of the fatigue crack propagation angle θf and the ductile crack extension angle θc 194 Figure 5.54: New cracks developed on the chord at the weld toe of XN1 during residual strength test 195 Figure 5.55: Results of existing experimental tests on residual strength of cracked tubular joints 199 Figure 5.56: Load-displacement behaviour of. .. strain gauges reading of J1-1F 165 Figure 5.11: Comparison of load feedback from load cell and load derived from linear strain gauge with the assumption of elastic bending of the brace 166 Figure 5.12: Brace fatigue crack profile on the left brace of J1-1F and final crack profile before fracture 167 Figure 5.13: (a) sectioning of J1-1F; (b) measurement of brace crack depth . FRACTURE AND FAILURE ASSESSMENT OF FATIGUE-CRACKED CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION X-JOINTS OU ZHIYONG (B. Eng. Hons.), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF. Failure assessment of PJP+ and high-strength X-joints 255 7.3.1 Introduction 255 7.3.2 Failure assessment for J1-1F 255 7.3.2.1 Effect of Crack-front profile 256 7.3.2.2 Level 2A and 2B failure. failure assessment of J1-1F 258 7.3.3 Failure assessment for J1-XF 265 7.3.4 Failure assessment of J1-2F 270 7.3.5 Failure assessment of thick-walled joint XN1 272 7.3.6 Discussions and conclusions