olecular interactions and dynamics in cyclic AMP signalling

MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND DYNAMICS IN CYCLIC AMP SIGNALING BALAKRISHNAN SHENBAGA MOORTHY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND DYNAMICS IN CYCLIC AMP SIGNALING BALAKRISHNAN SHENBAGA MOORTHY (Master of Technology in Biotechnology) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing my doctor of philosophy (PhD) is possible only because of the continuous support I received throughout my graduate career from many people. In addition to my friends and family members, I would like to thank the following people who supported in all the aspect of my personal and career life. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my project supervisor Dr. Ganesh Srinivasan Anand. I am proud to address myself as his first PhD graduate student. I express my deep sense of gratitude for his continuous guidance, timely advice, discussions and support through all the stages of my project. He also taught me in solving various problems encountered during my project. His passion for science provided me encouragement to successfully complete this project and to become a scientist. I am very much grateful to National University of Singapore for providing me the environment, facilities and full support to carry out my graduate study. I would like to extend my thanks to my PhD qualifying examiners, Prof. Liou Yih Cherng, Prof. Sanjay Swarup and Prof. Naweed Naqvi for their invaluable advices during discussions. I thank Prof. Ivana Mihalek, Bioinformatics Institute, Singapore and Prof. Giuseppe Melacini from McMaster‟s University, Hamilton for their current and future collaborations on my project. I would also like to thank Prof. Susan S. Taylor, Prof. William Loomis from University of California, San Diego and Prof. Linda Kenney from Mechanobiology Institute, Singapore for sharing clones and reagents for our studies. I would like to thank Prof. K Swaminathan and Prof. J Sivaraman for their scientific ideas in encouraging me to extend my project for crystallographic studies. i I thank our lab post-doc Dr. Gao Yunfeng for her help in molecular cloning and initial support in learning lab safety procedures. I appreciate my labmates, Suguna Badireddy, Tanushree Bishnoi, Srinath Krishnamurthy, Wang Loo Chien, Anusha Vedagiri, Jane Lin Liqin, Aparna Sankararaman, Christina Yap Xiaojun, Liang Yuan Yuan for their useful discussions and friendship. I thank Mr. Lim Teck Kwang for his technical support with mass spectrometry. I take this opportunity to thank my roommates, Raghu, Jayaraj, Thanneer, Kiran, Lakshmi, Vamsi and Prashant for their help and support in Singapore. I like to specially thank Dr. B. C. Karthik for his useful discussions and advice during lunch and tea sessions. I declare my thanks to my friends here in Singapore and in India for their continuous encouragements and help throughout my graduate career. I should thank my family members Amma, Appa, Sisters, Athai and Maama for their love and affection on me and making my life colorful. Last but not least, I wish to thank my wife Poornima for her love and continuous support during difficult situations. I thank God ever for giving me such a caring and understanding better half. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS viii SUMMARY x LIST OF TABLES xiii LIST OF FIGURES xiv LIST OF PUBLICATIONS xxv INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: Cooperativity and allostery in cAMP-dependent activation of Protein Kinase A: Monitoring conformations of intermediates by amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange 1.1 Introduction 16 1.2 Materials and Methods 1.2.1 Reagents 20 1.2.2 Purification of RIα(92-379)(R209K) and C- subunit 21 1.2.3 Amide HDXMS 21 1.3 Results and Discussion 1.3.1 Pepsin digestion of RIα(92-379)R209K and C- subunit 24 1.3.2 Evidence that cAMP binding to RIα(92-379)R209K:C holoenzyme does not lead to dissociation of the complex 31 1.3.3 cAMP binding to RIα(92-379) R209K:C holoenzyme decreases deuterium exchange in PBC:B 31 1.3.4 cAMP binding to CNB-B increases deuterium exchange 33 iii at interface between CNB-B and C-subunit 1.3.5 Effects of cAMP binding to RIα(92-379)R209K:C holoenzyme: Changes in PBC:A of RIα 34 1.3.6 Global conformational changes in RIα 35 1.3.6.1. Pseudosubstrate region 35 1.3.6.2. αB/C:Α, αC‟:A and αA:B helix 35 1.4 Conclusion 38 CHAPTER 2: Phosphodiesterases Catalyze Hydrolysis of cAMP-bound to Regulatory Subunit of Protein Kinase A and Mediate Signal Termination 2.1 Introduction 41 2.2 Materials and Methods 2.2.1 Materials 45 2.2.2 Cloning and Expression of a C-terminal deletion domain mutant of RegA 46 2.2.3 Protein Expression and Purification 47 2.2.4 Pull-Down Assays 47 2.2.5 Fluorescence Spectroscopy 48 2.2.6 Phosphodiesterase Assay 49 2.2.7 Fluorescence Polarization (FP) Assay for cAMP Dissociation 51 2.2.8 Amide HDXMS - (LC-ESI-QTOF-MS) 52 2.2.9 Amide HDXMS - (MALDI-TOF-MS) 54 iv 2.3 Results 2.3.1 Deletion Mutagenesis Indicates that the Catalytic Domain of RegA Mediates AKAP-independent Interactions with the CNB:A Domain 56 2.3.2 Measurement of Binding Affinity of RIα to RegA by Fluorescence Quenching 59 2.3.3 RIα Binding Induces a 13X Increase in RegA Phosphodiesterase Activity 60 2.3.4 Mapping RIα-RegA Interactions by Amide HDXMS 63 2.3.5 Three Regions on RIα showed Decreased Solvent Accessibility in the RegA-RIα Complex: Phosphate Binding Cassette, β-stands 1-2 and a:B-C-helices 69 2.3.6 RegA Catalyzes Hydrolysis of cAMP-bound to RIα 71 2.4 Discussion 2.4.1 RegA Phosphodiesterase is capable of Hydrolyzing cAMP-bound to RIα 77 2.4.2 Dual Function of RIα as Inhibitor of C-subunit and Activator of PDEs 80 2.4.3 RIα Mediates Distinct but Overlapping Interactions with PKA C- subunit and RegA-PDE 80 CHAPTER 3: Basis for the activation of phosphodiesterase in RegA-RIα interactions 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Materials and Methods 3.2.1 Materials 85 v 3.2.2. Protein Expression and Purification 85 3.2.3. Amide HDXMS 86 3.2.4. Pull down assay with immobilized cAMP -bound RIα(91-244 87 3.3 Results 3.3.1. Peptide Array Analysis for RegA:RIα Interactions 88 3.3.2. Pepsin digestion and peptide identification for RegA 91 3.3.3. Amide HDXMS 92 3.3.4. RegA-Rα interactions alter regions within metal binding site 94 3.3.5. Substrate binding pocket is stabilized during RegA- RIα interactions 95 3.3.6. RegA primes RIα for reassociation with C-subunit 98 3.4 Discussion 99 3.5 Conclusion 101 CHAPTER 4: Multi-State Allostery in Response Regulators: Phosphorylation and Mutagenesis Activate RegA via Alternate Modes 4.1 Introduction 106 4.2 Materials and Methods 4.2.1 Reagents 110 4.2.2 Cloning, expression and purification of RegA and mutants 110 vi 4.2.3 Phosphodiesterase activity assay 111 4.2.4 Amide HDXMS studies 111 4.3 Results 4.3.1 Mutation of the aromatic switch residue enhances phosphodiesterase catalysis of RegA 114 4.3.2 Phosphorylation causes decreased exchange across the Receiver Domain which reflects large scale stabilization and reduction in backbone dynamics 116 4.3.3 Interdomain linker and catalytic loop residues also show decreased deuterium exchange upon phosphorylation 119 4.3.4 Receiver domain of activating mutant (RegA F262W) is more dynamic compared to phosphorylated as well as unphosphorylated RegA 120 4.3.5 Deuterium exchange of the linker and catalytic domains in activating mutant, RegA F262W are distinct but overlap with phosphorylated RegA 120 4.3.6. Receiver domain decreases deuterium exchange within the catalytic PDE domain without altering activity 121 4.4 Discussion 4.4.1 Allosteric coupling of phosphorylation and aromatic switch residue 131 4.4.2 Dynamics of the catalytic domain in phosphorylated RegA and RegA F262W are overlapping yet distinct 132 4.4.3 Phosphorylation-dependent activation of RegA through decreases in protein-wide dynamics 133 4.5 Conclusion 139 FUTURE DIRECTIONS REFERENCES 142 146 vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AKAP: A- Kinase anchoring protein AC: Adenylyl cyclase BME: β- Mercaptoethanol C subunit: Catalytic subunit of PKA cAMP: Cyclic adenosine 3‟, 5‟- monophosphate CIAP: Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase CNB-A and CNB-B: cyclic nucleotide binding domain A and B respectively FM: Fluorescein maleimide GST: Glutathione S-Transferase FP: fluorescence polarization LC-ESI QTOF: Liquid chromatography- Electrospray ionization Quadrupole Time-of-flight MALDI-TOF: Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight NHS: N-hydroxysuccinimide PCR: polymerase chain reaction PDE: cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase PKA: Protein kinase A R-subunit: Regulatory subunit of PKA viii HDXMS studies with truncated mutant RIα (91-379) having two cAMP binding domain and RIα full length (1-379) having two cAMP binding domain, inhibitory region and the dimerization domain. Here we believe that physiological RIα will mediate multivalent interactions with RegA leading to higher binding affinities than observed with RIα(91244). This will provide invaluable insight into the structure and conformational dynamics of this seminal macromolecular complex in cAMP Signaling. Also studying unphosphorylated/phosphorylated full length RegA interaction with RIα may provide mechanism that link the two-component system and the cAMP Signaling in Dictyostelium discoideum. 2. Site directed mutational analysis to confirm the binding sites From our previous amide HDXMS results, it is very clear that RegA catalytic domain binds specifically to the cAMP binding A domain of RIα. Residues from RIα and RegA critical for interactions can be mutated to Ala to test and confirm the binding of RegA to RIα. Mutants of RIα which are critical for interactions with RegA can be tested for their ability to interact with and inhibit the C-subunit of PKA. This will reveal the mechanism of regulation of RIα-RegA interactions by the C-subunit and signal termination. Studies on point mutants of RegA that affect RIα-RegA interactions and point mutants that affect hydrolysis of cAMP will allow us to differentiate binding from enzyme activation mechanism. Identifying residues from RegA critical for interactions with RIα will help us to narrow down the process in identifying the mammalian homolog. 143 3. Computational modelling of the RegA-RIα interface We are collaborating with computational biologist to map the interaction surface of RegA with RIα by mapping surfaces that show decreased solvent accessibility upon complex formation using a combination of computational docking and amide HDXMS (Anand et al., 2003). Results from HDX can be combined with computational modelling techniques with the help of our collaborator, Dr. Ivana Mihalek, Bioinformatics Institute (BII), Singapore. 4. Monitoring interactions inside the cell Monitoring RIα mediated activation of PDEs inside the cell may lead to the finding of novel biological roles for this interactions. Cellular cAMP and PKA FRET reporter assays will be highly efficient in the activation studies. The rIa gene can be cotransfected into cells along with cytosolic and organelle-directed cAMP or PKA reporters to track the subcellular localization of separate PDE isoforms. Common cell lines such as HeLa can be used to monitor the activation of PDEs by RIα. HeLa cell lines can be subjected to siRNA knockdown of the RIα gene. The effects of decreased RIα expression on PDE activity can be monitored and the kinetics of cAMP hydrolysis can be compared between the wild-type cells and RIα knocked down cell lines. 5. Structure determination of RIα-RegA complex Structures of different states of deletion mutants of cAMP-free RIα, cAMP-bound RIα and in complex with the C-subunit have been previously solved by crystallography. A high-resolution structure of the RegA-RIα complex in combination with biophysical methods would be invaluable in mapping the magnitude of conformational changes 144 within RIα upon complexation with RegA, This would also provide insights into the mechanism by which RIα functions as an activator for PDE catalysis. This would further test our hypothesis that RIα-RegA interactions stabilize the substrate binding pocket and the dimer form of RegA to increase the PDE activity of RegA. Now, we are in process of screening conditions for the crystallization of RIα-RegA complex. The outcomes from our present research have provided molecular details of a regulatory mechanism in an important Signaling pathway. Given the physiological and pharmacological importance of both PKA and PDE, these findings will greatly drive research in this field. So far a bulk of drug discovery efforts have been designed to target G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which are upstream triggers for the cAMP Signaling pathway. Detailed understanding of this signal termination offers an alternate set of targets for targeting the cAMP Signaling pathway. 145 REFERENCES  Abu-Abed, M., Das, R., Wang, L., and Melacini, G. (2007). Definition of an electrostatic relay switch critical for the cAMP-dependent activation of protein kinase A as revealed by the D170A mutant of RI alpha. Proteins., 69, 112-124. Abu-Abed, M., Das, R., Wang, L., and Melacini, G. (2 007b). Definition of an electros tatic relay switch critical for the cAMP -dependent activation of protein kinase A as revealed by the D170A mutant of RIalpha. Proteins 69, 112-12 4.  Ames, S.K., Frankema, N., and Kenney, L.J. (1999). C-terminal DNA binding stimulates N-terminal phosphorylation of the outer membrane protein regulator OmpR from Escherichia coli. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 11792-11797.  Amieux, P.S., Cummings, D.E., Motamed, K., Brandon, E.P., Wailes, L.A., Le, K., Idzerda, R.L., and McKnight, G.S. (1997). Compensatory regulation of RIalpha protein levels in protein kinase A mutant mice. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 39933998.  Amieux, P.S., and McKnight, G.S. (2002). The essential role of RI alpha in the maintenance of regulated PKA activity. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci., 968, 75-95. Amieux, P.S., and McKnight, G. S. (200 2b). The essential ro le of RI alpha in the maintenance of regulated PKA activity . Ann N Y Acad Sci 96 8, 75-95.  Anand, G., Taylor, S.S., and Johnson, D.A. (2007). Cyclic-AMP and Pseudosubstrate Effects on Type-I A-Kinase Regulatory and Catalytic Subunit Binding Kinetics. Biochemistry., 46, 9283-9291.  Anand, G.S., Goudreau, P.N., and Stock, A.M. (1998). Activation of methylesterase CheB: evidence of a dual role for the regulatory domain. Biochemistry-Us., 37, 14038-14047.  Anand, G.S., Hughes, C.A., Jones, J.M., Taylor, S.S., and Komives, E.A. (2002). Amide H/2H exchange reveals communication between the cAMP and catalytic subunit-binding sites in the R(I)alpha subunit of protein kinase A. J. Mol. Biol., 323, 377-386.  Anand, G.S., Krishnamurthy, S., Bishnoi, T., Kornev, A., Taylor, S.S., and Johnson, D.A. (2010a). Cyclic-AMP and Rp-cAMPS induced conformational changes in a complex of the catalytic and regulatory (RIa) subunits of PKA. Mol Cell Proteomics. Anand, G.S., Krishnamurthy , S., Bishn oi, T., K ornev, A., Tay lor, S.S., and Joh nson, D.A . (2010b). Cy clic AMP - and (Rp)-cAMPS-induced conformational changes in a complex of the cataly tic and regulatory (RI{alpha}) subunits of cy clic AMP -dependent protein kinase. M ol Cell Proteomics 9, 222 5-223 7.  Anand, G.S., Law, D., Mandell, J.G., Snead, A.N., Tsigelny, I., Taylor, S.S., Ten Eyck, L.F., and Komives, E.A. (2003). Identification of the protein kinase A regulatory R-I alpha-catalytic subunit interface by amide H/H-2 exchange and protein docking. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 13264-13269.  Arnold, K., Bordoli, L., Kopp, J., and Schwede, T. (2006). The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics., 22, 195-201. 146  Badireddy, S., Gao, Y.F., Ritchie, M., Akamine, P., Wu, J., Kim, C.W., Taylor, S.S., Lin, Q.S., Swaminathan, K., and Anand, G.S. (2011). Cyclic AMP Analog Blocks Kinase Activation by Stabilizing Inactive Conformation: Conformational Selection Highlights a New Concept in Allosteric Inhibitor Design. Mol. Cell. Proteomics., 10.  Bagorda, A., Das, S., Rericha, E.C., Chen, D., Davidson, J., and Parent, C.A. (2009). Real-time measurements of cAMP production in live Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell. Sci., 122, 3907-3914.  Baikalov, I., Schroder, I., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak, M., Cascio, D., Gunsalus, R.P., and Dickerson, R.E. (1998). NarL dimerization? Suggestive evidence from a new crystal form. Biochemistry-Us., 37, 3665-3676.  Baillie, G.S., MacKenzie, S.J., McPhee, I., and Houslay, M.D. (2000). Sub-family selective actions in the ability of Erk2 MAP kinase to phosphorylate and regulate the activity of PDE4 cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterases. Br. J. Pharmacol., 131, 811-819.  Baillie, G.S., Scott, J.D., and Houslay, M.D. (2005). Compartmentalisation of phosphodiesterases and protein kinase A: opposites attract. FEBS Lett. 579, 32643270.  Bateman, R.H., Carruthers, R., Hoyes, J.B., Jones, C., Langridge, J.I., Millar, A., and Vissers, J.P. (2002). A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom., 13, 792-803.  Beebe, S.J. (1994). The Camp-Dependent Protein-Kinases and Camp SignalTransduction. Semin. Cancer. Biol., 5, 285-294.  Beebe, S.J.a.C., J.D. (1986). Cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase, Vol The Enzymes.  Bender, A.T., and Beavo, J.A. (2006). Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: molecular regulation to clinical use. Pharmacol. Rev., 58, 488-520.  Berman, H.M., Ten Eyck, L.F., Goodsell, D.S., Haste, N.M., Kornev, A., and Taylor, S.S. (2005). The cAMP binding domain: an ancient signaling module. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 45-50.  Birck, C., Mourey, L., Gouet, P., Fabry, B., Schumacher, J., Rousseau, P., Kahn, D., and Samama, J.P. (1999). Conformational changes induced by phosphorylation of the FixJ receiver domain. Struct. Fold. Des., 7, 1505-1515. 147  Boehr, D.D., Nussinov, R., and Wright, P.E. (2009). The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition (vol 5, pg 789, 2009). Nat. Chem. Biol., 5, 954-954.  Bolger, G.B., Baillie, G.S., Li, X., Lynch, M.J., Herzyk, P., Mohamed, A., Mitchell, L.H., McCahill, A., Hundsrucker, C., Klussmann, E., et al. (2006). Scanning peptide array analyses identify overlapping binding sites for the signalling scaffold proteins, beta-arrestin and RACK1, in cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D5. Biochem. J., 398, 23-36.  Bourret, R.B. (2010). Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 13, 142-149.  Buckler, D.R., Anand, G.S., and Stock, A.M. (2000). Response-regulator phosphorylation and activation: a two-way street? Trends. Microbiol., 8, 153-156.  Burns, L.L., Canaves, J.M., Pennypacker, J.K., Blumenthal, D.K., and Taylor, S.S. (2003). Isoform specific differences in binding of a dual-specificity A-kinase anchoring protein to type I and type II regulatory subunits of PKA. Biochemistry., 42, 5754-5763.  Canaves, J.M., Leon, D.A., and Taylor, S.S. (2000). Consequences of cAMPbinding site mutations on the structural stability of the type I regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Biochemistry., 39, 15022-15031.  Canaves, J.M., and Taylor, S.S. (2002). Classification and phylogenetic analysis of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulatory subunit family. J. Mol. Evol., 54, 17-29.  Chiaradonna, F., Balestrieri, C., Gaglio, D., and Vanoni, M. (2008). RAS And PKA pathways in cancer: new insight from transcriptional analysis. Front. Biosci., 13, 5257-5278.  Conti, M. (2000). Phosphodiesterases and cyclic nucleotide signaling in endocrine cells. Mol. Endocrinol., 14, 1317-1327.  Conti, M., and Beavo, J. (2007). Biochemistry and physiology of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: essential components in cyclic nucleotide signaling. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 76, 481-511. Conti, M., and Beavo, J. (20 07b). Biochemistry and phy siology of cy clic nucleotide phosphod iesterases: essential components in cy clic nucleotide s ignaling. Annual review of b iochemistry 76, 481-511.  Conti, M., Richter, W., Mehats, C., Livera, G., Park, J.Y., and Jin, C. (2003). Cyclic AMP-specific PDE4 phosphodiesterases as critical components of cyclic AMP signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 5493-5496. 148  Corbin, J.D., and Rannels, S.R. (1980). Structure-Function-Relationships of Cyclic Nucleotide-Dependent Protein-Kinases. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S., 180, 239.  Dao, K.K., Teigen, K., Kopperud, R., Hodneland, E., Schwede, F., Christensen, A.E., Martinez, A., and Doskeland, S.O. (2006). Epac1 and cAMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme have similar cAMP affinity, but their cAMP domains have distinct structural features and cyclic nucleotide recognition. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 21500-21511.  Degerman, E., Belfrage, P., and Manganiello, V.C. (1997). Structure, localization, and regulation of cGMP-inhibited phosphodiesterase (PDE3). J. Biol. Chem., 272, 6823-6826.  Diller, T.C., Madhusudan, Xuong, N.H., and Taylor, S.S. (2001). Molecular basis for regulatory subunit diversity in cAMP-dependent protein kinase: crystal structure of the type II beta regulatory subunit. Structure., 9, 73-82.  Diller, T.C., Xuong, N.H., and Taylor, S.S. (2000). Type II beta regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase: purification strategies to optimize crystallization. Protein. Expr. Purif., 20, 357-364.  Dodge, K.L., Khouangsathiene, S., Kapiloff, M.S., Mouton, R., Hill, E.V., Houslay, M.D., Langeberg, L.K., and Scott, J.D. (2001). mAKAP assembles a protein kinase A/PDE4 phosphodiesterase cAMP signaling module. Embo. J., 20, 1921-1930.  Dyer, C.M., and Dahlquist, F.W. (2006). Switched or not?: the structure of unphosphorylated CheY bound to the N terminus of FliM. J. Bacteriol., 188, 7354-7363.  Egger, L.A., Park, H., and Inouye, M. (1997). Signal transduction via the histidylaspartyl phosphorelay. Genes. Cells., 2, 167-184.  Englander, S.W. (2006). Hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry: A historical perspective. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectr., 17, 1481-1489.  Englander, S.W., and Kallenbach, N.R. (1983). Hydrogen exchange and structural dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids. Q. Rev. Biophys., 16, 521-655.  Feher, V.A., and Cavanagh, J. (1999). Millisecond-timescale motions contribute to the function of the bacterial response regulator protein Spo0F. Nature., 400, 289-293. 149  Francis, S.H., Blount, M.A., and Corbin, J.D. (2011). Mammalian cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: molecular mechanisms and physiological functions. Physiol. Rev., 91, 651-690.  Francis, S.H., and Corbin, J.D. (1994). Structure and Function of Cyclic Nucleotide-Dependent Protein-Kinases. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 56, 237-272.  Galperin, M.Y. (2010). Diversity of structure and function of response regulator output domains. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 13, 150-159.  Geromanos, S.J., Vissers, J.P., Silva, J.C., Dorschel, C.A., Li, G.Z., Gorenstein, M.V., Bateman, R.H., and Langridge, J.I. (2009). The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS. Proteomics., 9, 1683-1695.  Gibson, R.M., Ji-Buechler, Y., and Taylor, S.S. (1997). Interaction of the regulatory and catalytic subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Electrostatic sites on the type Ialpha regulatory subunit. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 16343-16350.  Gold, M.G., Lygren, B., Dokurno, P., Hoshi, N., McConnachie, G., Tasken, K., Carlson, C.R., Scott, J.D., and Barford, D. (2006). Molecular basis of AKAP specificity for PKA regulatory subunits. Mol. Cell., 24, 383-395.  Goodrich, J.A.a.K., J.F. (2007). Binding and Kinetics for Molecular Biologists, Vol Chapter 2, edn (Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).  Goraya, T.A., and Cooper, D.M. (2005). Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent phosphodiesterase (PDE1): current perspectives. Cell. Signal., 17, 789-797.  Gross-Langenhoff, M., Hofbauer, K., Weber, J., Schultz, A., and Schultz, J.E. (2006). cAMP is a ligand for the tandem GAF domain of human phosphodiesterase 10 and cGMP for the tandem GAF domain of phosphodiesterase 11. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 2841-2846.  Gurrath, M. (2001). Peptide-binding G protein-coupled receptors: new opportunities for drug design. Curr. Med. Chem., 8, 1605-1648.  Hamuro, Y., Anand, G.S., Kim, J.S., Juliano, C., Stranz, D.D., Taylor, S.S., and Woods, V.L., Jr. (2004). Mapping intersubunit interactions of the regulatory subunit (RIalpha) in the type I holoenzyme of protein kinase A by amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS). J. Mol. Biol., 340, 1185-1196. 150  Han, P., Sonati, P., Rubin, C., and Michaeli, T. (2006). PDE7A1, a cAMPspecific phosphodiesterase, inhibits cAMP-dependent protein kinase by a direct interaction with C. J. Biol. Chem., 281, 15050-15057. Han, P., Sonati, P., Rubin, C. , and Michaeli, T. (2006b). PDE7A1 , a cAMP-specific phosphod iesterase, inhib its cAMP-dependent pro tein kinase by a direct interaction with C. J Bio l Chem 281, 5050-150 57.  Heikaus, C.C., Pandit, J., and Klevit, R.E. (2009). Cyclic nucleotide binding GAF domains from phosphodiesterases: structural and mechanistic insights. Structure., 17, 1551-1557.  Henzler-Wildman, K., and Kern, D. (2007). Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature., 450, 964-972.  Herberg, F.W., Bell, S.M., and Taylor, S.S. (1993). Expression of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase in Escherichia coli: multiple isozymes reflect different phosphorylation states. Protein. Eng., 6, 771-777.  Herberg, F.W., Taylor, S.S., and Dostmann, W.R. (1996). Active site mutations define the pathway for the cooperative activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Biochemistry., 35, 2934-2942.  Hoofnagle, A.N., Resing, K.A., and Ahn, N.G. (2003). Protein analysis by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32, 125.  Huai, Q., Liu, Y., Francis, S.H., Corbin, J.D., and Ke, H. (2004). Crystal structures of phosphodiesterases and in complex with inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1methylxanthine suggest a conformation determinant of inhibitor selectivity. J. Biol. Chem., 279, 13095-13101.  Huang, L.J., Wang, L., Ma, Y., Durick, K., Perkins, G., Deerinck, T.J., Ellisman, M.H., and Taylor, S.S. (1999). NH2-Terminal targeting motifs direct dual specificity A-kinase-anchoring protein (D-AKAP1) to either mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell. Biol.,145, 951-959.  Hughes, C.A., Mandell, J.G., Anand, G.S., Stock, A.M., and Komives, E.A. (2001). Phosphorylation causes subtle changes in solvent accessibility at the interdomain interface of methylesterase CheB. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 967-976. Hughes, C.A., Mandell, J.G., Anand, G .S., Stock, A.M., and K omives, E.A. (200 1b). Phosphory lation causes s ubtle changes in solvent accessibility at the interdomain in terface of methy lesterase CheB. J Mol Bio l 307, 67-976.  Hurley, J.H., Dean, A.M., Sohl, J.L., Koshland, D.E., and Stroud, R.M. (1990). Regulation of an Enzyme by Phosphorylation at the Active-Site. Science., 249, 1012-1016.  Jeon, Y.H., Heo, Y.S., Kim, C.M., Hyun, Y.L., Lee, T.G., Ro, S., and Cho, J.M. (2005). Phosphodiesterase: overview of protein structures, potential therapeutic applications and recent progress in drug development. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci., 62, 1198-1220. 151  Johnson, D.A., Akamine, P., Radzio-Andzelm, E., Madhusudan, M., and Taylor, S.S. (2001). Dynamics of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Chem. Rev., 101, 2243-2270.  Kamenetsky, M., Middelhaufe, S., Bank, E.M., Levin, L.R., Buck, J., and Steegborn, C. (2006). Molecular details of cAMP generation in mammalian cells: a tale of two systems. J. Mol. Biol., 362, 623-639.  Katta, V., and Chait, B.T. (1991). Conformational changes in proteins probed by hydrogen-exchange electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid. Commun. Mass. Spectrom., 5, 214-217.  Katz, C., Levy-Beladev, L., Rotem-Bamberger, S., Rito, T., Rudiger, S.G., and Friedler, A. (2011). Studying protein-protein interactions using peptide arrays. Chem. Soc. Rev., 40, 2131-2145.  Ke, H.M., and Wang, H.C. (2007). Crystal structures of phosphodiesterases and implications on substrate specificity and inhibitor selectivity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem., 7, 391-403.  Kim, C., Cheng, C.Y., Saldanha, S.A., and Taylor, S.S. (2007). PKA-I holoenzyme structure reveals a mechanism for cAMP-dependent activation. Cell., 130, 1032-1043.  Kim, C., Xuong, N.H., and Taylor, S.S. (2005). Crystal structure of a complex between the catalytic and regulatory (RI alpha) subunits of PKA. Science., 307, 690-696. Kim, C., Xuong , N.H., and Tay lor, S. S. (2005 b). Cry stal structure of a complex between the cataly tic and regulatory (RIalpha) subunits of PKA. Science 307, 690-69 6.  Kim, H.J., Chang, W.T., Meima, M., Gross, J.D., and Schaap, P. (1998). A novel adenylyl cyclase detected in rapidly developing mutants of Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 30859-30862.  Konermann, L., Pan, J., and Liu, Y.H. (2011). Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for studying protein structure and dynamics. Chem. Soc. Rev., 40, 1224-1234.  Kool, J., van Marle, A., Hulscher, S., Selman, M., van Iperen, D.J., van Altena, K., Gillard, M., Bakker, R.A., Irth, H., Leurs, R., et al. (2007). A flow-through fluorescence polarization detection system for measuring GPCR-mediated modulation of cAMP production. J. Biomol. Screen., 12, 1074-1083.  Kopperud, R., Christensen, A.E., Kjarland, E., Viste, K., Kleivdal, H., and Doskeland, S.O. (2002). Formation of inactive cAMP-saturated holoenzyme of cAMP-dependent protein kinase under physiological conditions. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 13443-13448. 152  Lam, K.H., Ling, T.K.W., and Au, S.W.N. (2010). Crystal Structure of Activated CheY1 from Helicobacter pylori. J. Bacteriol., 192, 2324-2334.  Lee, S.Y., Cho, H.S., Pelton, J.G., Yan, D.L., Berry, E.A., and Wemmer, D.E. (2001). Crystal structure of activated CheY - Comparison with other activated receiver domains. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 16425-16431.  Levitzki, A., Marbach, I., and Barsinai, A. (1993). The Signal-Transduction between Beta-Receptors and Adenylyl Cyclase. Life. Sci., 52, 2093-2100.  Lewis, R.J., Brannigan, J.A., Muchova, K., Barak, I., and Wilkinson, A.J. (1999). Phosphorylated aspartate in the structure of a response regulator protein. J. Mol. Biol., 294, 9-15.  Li, G.Z., Vissers, J.P., Silva, J.C., Golick, D., Gorenstein, M.V., and Geromanos, S.J. (2009). Database searching and accounting of multiplexed precursor and product ion spectra from the data independent analysis of simple and complex peptide mixtures. Proteomics., 9, 1696-1719.  Lim, C.J., Han, J., Yousefi, N., Ma, Y., Amieux, P.S., McKnight, G.S., Taylor, S.S., and Ginsberg, M.H. (2007). Alpha4 integrins are type I cAMP-dependent protein kinase-anchoring proteins. Nat. Cell. Biol., 9, 415-421.  Liu, Y.H., Belcheva, A., Konermann, L., and Golemi-Kotra, D. (2009). Phosphorylation-induced activation of the response regulator VraR from Staphylococcus aureus: insights from hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. J. Mol. Biol., 391, 149-163.  Liu, Y.H., Belcheva, A., Konermann, L., and Golemi-Kotra, D. (2009b). Phosphorylation-Induced Activation of the Response Regulator VraR from Staphylococcus aureus: Insights from Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry. J. Mol. Biol., 391, 149-163.  Lukat, G.S., McCleary, W.R., Stock, A.M., and Stock, J.B. (1992). Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 89, 718-722.  MacKenzie, S.J., Baillie, G.S., McPhee, I., MacKenzie, C., Seamons, R., McSorley, T., Millen, J., Beard, M.B., van Heeke, G., and Houslay, M.D. (2002). Long PDE4 cAMP specific phosphodiesterases are activated by protein kinase Amediated phosphorylation of a single serine residue in Upstream Conserved Region (UCR1). Br. J. Pharmacol., 136, 421-433.  Madhusudan, Akamine, P., Xuong, N.H., and Taylor, S.S. (2002). Crystal structure of a transition state mimic of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Nat. Struct. Biol., 9, 273-277. 153  Maeda, M., Lu, S.J., Shaulsky, G., Miyazaki, Y., Kuwayama, H., Tanaka, Y., Kuspa, A., and Loomis, W.F. (2004). Periodic signaling controlled by an oscillatory circuit that includes protein kinases ERK2 and PKA. Science., 304, 875-878.  Mandell, J.G., Baerga-Ortiz, A., Akashi, S., Takio, K., and Komives, E.A. (2001). Solvent accessibility of the thrombin-thrombomodulin interface. J. Mol. Biol. 306, 575-589.  Mandell, J.G., Falick, A.M., and Komives, E.A. (1998). Identification of proteinprotein interfaces by decreased amide proton solvent accessibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 14705-14710.  Mandell, J.G., Falick, A.M., and Komives, E.A. (1998). Measurement of amide hydrogen exchange by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 70, 39873995.  McKnight, G.S. (1991). Cyclic AMP second messenger systems. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 3, 213-217.  McNicholl, E.T., Das, R., SilDas, S., Taylor, S.S., and Melacini, G. Communication between tandem cAMP binding domains in the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A-Ialpha as revealed by domain-silencing mutations. J. Biol. Chem., 285, 15523-15537.  Meinkoth, J.L., Alberts, A.S., Went, W., Fantozzi, D., Taylor, S.S., Hagiwara, M., Montminy, M., and Feramisco, J.R. (1993). Signal-Transduction through the Camp-Dependent Protein-Kinase. Mol. Cell. Biochem., 128, 179-186.  Michel, J.J., and Scott, J.D. (2002). AKAP mediated signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 42, 235-257.  Mizuno, T. (1998). His-Asp phosphotransfer signal transduction. J. BiochemTokyo., 123, 555-563.  Moens, U., Kostenko, S., Shiryaev, A., Dumitriu, G., and Gerits, N. (2011). Cross-talk between protein kinase A and the MAPK-activated protein kinases RSK1 and MK5. J. Recept. Sig. Transd., 31, 1-9.  Moorthy, B.S., Badireddy, S., and Anand, G.S. (2011a). Cooperativity and allostery in cAMP-dependent activation of Protein Kinase A: Monitoring conformations of intermediates by amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry., 302, 157-166. 154  Moorthy, B.S., Gao, Y., and Anand, G.S. (2011b). Phosphodiesterases catalyze hydrolysis of cAMP-bound to regulatory subunit of protein kinase A and mediate signal termination. Mol. Cell. Proteomics., 10, M110 002295.  Ogreid, D., and Doskeland, S.O. (1983). Cyclic nucleotides modulate the release of [3H] adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphate bound to the regulatory moiety of protein kinase I by the catalytic subunit of the kinase. Biochemistry., 22, 1686-1696.  Okada, D., and Asakawa, S. (2002). Allosteric activation of cGMP-specific, cGMP-binding phosphodiesterase (PDE5) by cGMP. Biochemistry., 41, 96729679.  Popovych, N., Sun, S., Ebright, R.H., and Kalodimos, C.G. (2006). Dynamically driven protein allostery. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 13, 831-838.  Robinson-White, A., and Stratakis, C.A. (2002). Protein kinase A signaling "Cross-talk" with other pathways in endocrine cells. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci., 968, 256-270.  Robinson, V.L., Buckler, D.R., and Stock, A.M. (2000). A tale of two components: a novel kinase and a regulatory switch. Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 626633.  Schwede, F., Christensen, A., Liauw, S., Hippe, T., Kopperud, R., Jastorff, B., and Doskeland, S.O. (2000). 8-Substituted cAMP analogues reveal marked differences in adaptability, hydrogen bonding, and charge accommodation between homologous binding sites (AI/AII and BI/BII) in cAMP kinase I and II. Biochemistry., 39, 8803-8812.  Shabb, J.B. (2001). Physiological substrates of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Chem. Rev., 101, 2381-2411.  Shaulsky, G., Escalante, R., and Loomis, W.F. (1996). Developmental signal transduction pathways uncovered by genetic suppressors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 15260-15265.  Shaulsky, G., Fuller, D., and Loomis, W.F. (1998). A cAMP-phosphodiesterase controls PKA-dependent differentiation. Development., 125, 691-699.  Silva, J.C., Denny, R., Dorschel, C.A., Gorenstein, M., Kass, I.J., Li, G.Z., McKenna, T., Nold, M.J., Richardson, K., Young, P., et al. (2005). Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem., 77, 21872200. 155  Simonovic, M., and Volz, K. (2001). A distinct meta-active conformation in the 1.1-angstrom resolution structure of wild-type apoCheY. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 28637-28640.  Stewart, R.C. (1993). Activating and inhibitory mutations in the regulatory domain of CheB, the methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem., 268, 1921-1930.  Stock, A.M., and Guhaniyogi, J. (2006). A new perspective on response regulator activation. J. Bacteriol., 188, 7328-7330.  Stock, A.M., Robinson, V.L., and Goudreau, P.N. (2000). Two-component signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 69, 183-215. Stoc k, A. M., Robin son, V.L., an d Goudreau, P.N. (2000b). Two-component s ignal transduction . Annual Review of Biochemistry 69, 183-215.  Su, Y., Dostmann, W.R., Herberg, F.W., Durick, K., Xuong, N.H., Ten Eyck, L., Taylor, S.S., and Varughese, K.I. (1995). Regulatory subunit of protein kinase A: structure of deletion mutant with cAMP binding domains. Science., 269, 807-813.  Sung, B.J., Hwang, K.Y., Jeon, Y.H., Lee, J.I., Heo, Y.S., Kim, J.H., Moon, J., Yoon, J.M., Hyun, Y.L., Kim, E., et al. (2003). Structure of the catalytic domain of human phosphodiesterase with bound drug molecules. Nature., 425, 98-102.  Taylor, S.S., Kim, C., Cheng, C.Y., and Saldanha, S.A. (2007). PKA-I holoenzyme structure reveals a mechanism for cAMP-dependent activation. Cell., 130, 1032-1043.  Thomason, P.A., Traynor, D., Cavet, G., Chang, W.T., Harwood, A.J., and Kay, R.R. (1998a). An intersection of the cAMP/PKA and two-component signal transduction systems in Dictyostelium. Embo. J., 17, 2838-2845. Thomason, P.A., Tray nor, D., Cavet, G., Chang, W.T ., Harwood, A.J., an d Kay , R.R. (1998 b). An in tersection of the cAMP/PKA and tw o-component signal transductio n sy stems in Dicty ostelium. Embo J ournal 17, 838-2845.  Thomason, P.A., Traynor, D., Stock, J.B., and Kay, R.R. (1999). The RdeA-RegA system, a eukaryotic phospho-relay controlling cAMP breakdown. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 27379-27384.  Tsutsui, Y., and Wintrode, P.L. (2007). Hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for probing protein structure, dynamics and interactions. Curr. Med. Chem., 14, 2344-2358.  Volkman, B.F., Lipson, D., Wemmer, D.E., and Kern, D. (2001). Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science., 291, 2429-2433.  Volz, K. (1993). Structural Conservation in the Chey Superfamily. BiochemistryUs., 32, 11741-11753. 156  Wales, T.E., and Engen, J.R. (2006). Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass. Spectrom. Rev., 25, 158-170.  Wales, T.E., Fadgen, K.E., Gerhardt, G.C., and Engen, J.R. (2008). High-speed and high-resolution UPLC separation at zero degrees Celsius. Anal. Chem., 80, 6815-6820.  Wang, H.C., Yan, Z., Yang, S., Cai, J.W., Robinson, H., and Ke, H.M. (2008). Kinetic and Structural Studies of Phosphodiesterase-8A and Implication on the Inhibitor Selectivity. Biochemistry-Us., 47, 12760-12768.  Weis, D.D., Engen, J.R., and Kass, I.J. (2006). Semi-automated data processing of hydrogen exchange mass spectra using HX-Express. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectr., 17, 1700-1703. Weis, D.D., Engen, J. R., and Kas s, I.J. (2006 b). Semi-automated data processing of hy drogen exchange mass spectra using HX-Express. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 17, 1700-1 703.  Wess, J. (1997). G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular mechanisms involved in receptor activation and selectivity of G-protein recognition. FASEB. J., 11, 346354.  Wessels, D., Zhang, H., Daniels, K.J., Heid, P., Clark, M., Lu, S.J., Kuspa, A., Shaulsky, G., Loomis, W.F., and Soll, D.R. (2000). The internal phosphodiesterase RegA is essential for the suppression of lateral pseudopods during Dictyostelium chemotaxis. Mol Biol Cell 11, 381a-381a.  Wong, W., and Scott, J.D. (2004). AKAP signalling complexes: focal points in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 959-970.  Wu, J., Jones, J.M., Nguyen-Huu, X., Ten Eyck, L.F., and Taylor, S.S. (2004). Crystal structures of RIalpha subunit of cyclic adenosine 5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase complexed with (Rp)-adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphothioate and (Sp)-adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphothioate, the phosphothioate analogues of cAMP. Biochemistry., 43, 6620-6629.  Wu, P., and Wang, P. (2004). Per-Arnt-Sim domain-dependent association of cAMP-phosphodiesterase 8A1 with IkappaB proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 17634-17639.  Zaccolo, M. (2006). Phosphodiesterases and compartmentalized cAMP signalling in the heart. Eur. J. Cell. Biol., 85, 693-697.  Zaccolo, M., Di Benedetto, G., Zoccarato, A., Lissandron, V., Terrin, A., Li, X., Houslay, M.D., and Baillie, G.S. (2008). Protein kinase a type I and type II define distinct intracellular signaling compartments. Circ. Res., 103, 836-844. 157  Zapf, J.W., Hoch, J.A., and Whiteley, J.M. (1996). A phosphotransferase activity of the Bacillus subtilis sporulation protein SpoOF that employs phosphoramidate substrates. Biochemistry-Us., 35, 2926-2933.  Zheng, J., Knighton, D.R., ten Eyck, L.F., Karlsson, R., Xuong, N., Taylor, S.S., and Sowadski, J.M. (1993). Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cAMPdependent protein kinase complexed with MgATP and peptide inhibitor. Biochemistry., 32, 2154-2161.  Zhu, X., Rebello, J., Matsumura, P., and Volz, K. (1997). Crystal structures of CheY mutants Y106W and T87I/Y106W. CheY activation correlates with movement of residue 106. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 5000-5006.  Zhu, X.Y., Amsler, C.D., Volz, K., and Matsumura, P. (1996). Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., 178, 4208-4215. 158 [...]... connected to two cAMP binding domains by a variable, disordered linker region The proximal cAMPbinding domain is referred to as the cAMP binding A domain and the distal domain is the cAMP binding B domain The C-subunit on the other hand is a globular protein and can be shown to consist of an N and C-terminal lobe and enclosing an ATP and substratebinding cleft The R-subunit consists of an N-terminal dimerization... cooperative and sequential with cAMP binding first to CNB-B and then to CNB-A Mutation of Arg 209 to a Lys in CNB-Α of R- subunit abolishes high-affinity cAMP binding to the CNB-Α without significantly affecting binding of cAMP to CNB-B The holoenzyme, RIα(92379)R209K:C provides an ideal model system to probe the effects of a single cAMP binding to CNB-B and studying effects of a single cAMP bound intermediate... an N-terminal dimerization domain followed by pseudosubstrate or the inhibitor motif to which the catalytic core of C subunit interacts The R-subunit lacking the N-terminal dimerization domain, RIα(92-379) and RIα(91244), retains high affinity binding to the C-subunit and provides a minimal monomeric model for examining R-C interactions as well as cAMP binding to CNB-A and CNB-B (Kim et al., 2007; Su... subunits and the RIαC holoenzyme (Kim et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 2007) show snapshots of PKA in its two stable end states (inactive and active) (Figure: ii) So, understanding the mechanism of activation and the intermediates in PKA is highly important in cAMP Signaling For activating this enzyme one molecule of cAMP has to bind to each of the cAMP binding domains, this is assumed to occur in a serial... regulatory domains (Figure: iii) for instance, calmodulin 5 binding domain, GAF (cGMP specific PDE, Adenylyl cyclase, and Fh1A) domain, UCR (Upstream Conserved Region) domain, PAS (Period clock protein, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, and Single minded protein) domain, REC (receiver) domain and Transmembrane domain (Conti and Beavo, 2007; Francis et al., 2011) Figure iii: Domain organization... serial manner First, one molecule of cAMP binds to the B domain (CNB-B) which cooperatively facilitates binding of a second molecule of cAMP binding to the A domain (CNB-A) leading to the release of the catalytic 4 subunit The cAMP binding domain B is believed to act as “gatekeeper” for modulating cAMP access to domain A (Taylor et al., 2007) The role of B domain and the mechanism by which it controls... This 3 information indicates that RIα is uniquely required for effective regulation of the PKA kinase and stresses the importance of RIα localization, regulation and molecular interactions iv Tightly regulated PKA activation - Role of two cAMP binding domains The mammalian RIα isoform is modular and extended proteins having a very similar domain organization with an N-terminal dimerization domain connected... both CNB-A and CNB-B In PBC:A, the critical conserved residues Arg 209 and Glu 200 and in PBC:B, Arg 333 and Glu 324 anchor the cyclic phosphate and 2‟OH moieties of cAMP (yellow) respectively 19 1.2 Cartoon showing step-wise cAMP-mediated activation of PKA (Rsubunit in red, C-subunit in blue, *- represents a molecule of cAMP, X- represents mutation that abolishes high-affinity binding of cAMP) Activation... role of cAMP in mammalian cells is mediated through the activation of cAMP dependent Protein Kinase A (PKA) cAMP binding induces large conformational changes within the R-subunit leading to dissociation of the active C-subunit Although crystal structures of end-point, inactive and active states are available, the molecular basis for cooperativity in cAMP-dependent activation of PKA is not clear In this... increased exchange upon binding cAMP are in red and suggest disruption of the specific intersubunit contacts mediated by the CNB-B domain with the C-subunit (yellow arrow), (site 4 of R-C intersubunit interactions, (Kim et al., 2007)) 33 1.7 Increased exchange upon binding of a single molecule of cAMP to RIα(92-379) R209K:C holoenzyme, within residues 230-270 (spanning α:B/C and α:A of CNB-B) region . MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND DYNAMICS IN CYCLIC AMP SIGNALING BALAKRISHNAN SHENBAGA MOORTHY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2011 MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS AND. Domain organization of RIα showing an N-terminal dimerization/docking domain (D/D) (gray hashed box) connected by a linker to two tandem cAMP-binding domains, CNB-A and CNB-B in green. The linker. critical for RegA-RIα interactions include the metal binding M site and substrate binding Q pocket in RegA. Results from the pull down experiment show that RegA binding primes cAMP-bound RIα for