Engineering scaffold and soluble cues for cell instruction

ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD AND SOLUBLE CUES FOR CELL-INSTRUCTION LIANG YOUYUN B.Eng. (Hons.), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF NUS-UIUC JOINT DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. ____________________________ Liang Youyun 31 May 2013 ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my advisors, A/P Tong Yen Wah and Dr. Kong Hyunjoon, for their inspiration, guidance and steadfast support. This thesis would not have been possible without them. I would also like to acknowledge the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR, Singapore) for providing funding for the NUSUIUC Joint Ph.D. fellowship, and various other funding sources for supporting the work in this thesis [National Science Foundation (CAREER: DMR-0847253), Science and Technology Centers-Emergent Behaviors of Integrated Cellular Systems (STC-EBICS, CBET-0939511), National Institute of Health (NIH R21 HL097314 A), United States Army Grant (W81XWH-08-1-0701) and the Illinois Regenerative Medicine Institute]. I would also like to thank Dr. Jeong Jaehyun, Mr. Ross J. DeVolder, Dr. Cha Chaenyung, Dr. Tor W. Jensen, Dr. Fei Wang, Dr. Edward J. Roy, Dr. Amy Kaczmarowski, Ms. Bao Zhong Zhang, Dr. Chen Wenhui, Mr. Chen Yiren, Mr. Anjaneyulu Kodali, Dr. Luo Jingnan, and Ms. Sushmitha Sundar for their invaluable advice and inputs in various parts of this work. I am also very grateful for the generous help and advice given by my coworkers throughout my candidature. Finally, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my parents, my husband, and my family members for their devoted support throughout my entire candidature. iii Table of contents Declaration . ii Acknowledgements iii Table of contents iv Summary . xi List of tables xiii List of figures xiv List of symbols and abbreviations xviii Motivation, hypotheses and objectives 1.1 Motivation 1.2 Hypotheses .2 1.3 Objectives Literature review .6 2.1 Tissue engineering approaches 2.2 Cell-instructive tissue engineering scaffolds .8 2.3 Hydrogel scaffolds .9 2.4 Hydrogel scaffold design considerations .10 iv 2.5 Native ECM .15 2.6 Cell-ECM interactions .17 2.7 Scaffold-directed cell responses 18 2.8 Effect of matrix stiffness 20 2.9 Effect of matrix stiffness on cancer cells .22 2.10 Effect of matrix stiffness on fibroblasts .23 2.11 Quantification of matrix stiffness 25 2.12 Scaffold modification to control stiffness 27 2.13 Collagen-based hydrogel scaffolds 31 2.14 Controlled delivery vehicles used in tissue engineering 32 2.15 Integrated tissue engineering approaches 36 Materials and method .39 3.1 Overview of experimental scheme .40 3.2 Chemical cross-linking of collagen gels 41 3.3 Increasing fiber rigidity of collagen gel through thermodynamic control .42 3.4 Scanning electron microscope imaging of collagen gels .42 3.5 Mechanical characterization of collagen gels 43 v 3.6 Permeability assay of collagen gels .45 3.7 Second-harmonic-generation confocal imaging of collagen gels 46 3.8 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of collagen gels .46 3.9 Differential scanning calorimetric analysis of collagen gels .46 3.10 Calculation of theoretical fiber diameters in collagen/PEG gels .47 3.11 Cell seeding of HepG2 .49 3.12 Cell seeding of fibroblasts .49 3.13 Cytotoxicity assays 50 3.14 Total DNA quantification 51 3.15 Immunofluorescent staining and confocal imaging .51 3.16 Cytochrome P450 assay .52 3.17 Urea detoxification assay .53 3.18 Matrix metalloproteinase degradation assay 54 3.19 Evaluation of angiogenic activity 55 3.20 Collagen gel contraction assay .56 3.21 Synthesis of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .56 3.22 NMR characterization of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .56 vi 3.23 Mechanical characterization of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels 57 3.24 Swelling studies of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels 57 3.25 Degradation studies of PEGDA-PEI 57 3.26 Determination of number of unreacted amines 58 3.27 Imaging of water diffusion into PEGDA-PEI hydrogels using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) .59 3.28 Cytotoxicity assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .59 3.29 In vitro protein release assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .60 3.30 In vivo drug release assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels 60 3.31 Stem cell mobilization with PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .61 3.32 Statistical analysis 62 Regulation of HCC malignancy through covalent modification of collagen scaffold 63 4.1 Tuning stiffness of collagen gels through chemical cross-linking .64 4.2 Second-harmonic-generation confocal imaging of cross-linked collagen gels .65 4.3 Permeability assay of cross-linked collagen gels .66 4.4 Control of HCC morphology with bulk gel stiffness .67 4.5 Control of HCC phenotype with bulk gel stiffness 69 4.6 Control of HCC angiogenic propensity with bulk gel stiffness .72 vii 4.7 Discussion on regulation of HCC malignancy through covalent modification of collagen scaffold 76 4.8 Conclusion on regulation of HCC malignancy through covalent modification of collagen scaffold 79 Regulation of HCC malignancy through MMP-1 degradation of cross-linked collagen .80 5.1 Softening of cross-linked collagen gel through MMP-1 degradation 81 5.2 Second-harmonic-generation confocal imaging of degraded collagen gels 83 5.3 Permeability assay of degraded collagen gels .84 5.4 Control of HCC morphology through MMP degradation of gel .84 5.5 Control of HCC phenotype through MMP degradation of gel 86 5.6 Discussion on regulation of HCC malignancy through MMP-1 degradation of cross-linked collagen .88 5.7 Conclusion on regulation of HCC malignancy through MMP-1 degradation of cross-linked collagen .89 Regulation of fibroblast activation state through thermodynamics-driven modification of collagen 90 6.1 Increasing fiber diameter of collagen gel through thermodynamic control .91 6.2 Mechanistic study of thermodynamic control 93 6.3 Increasing fiber rigidity of collagen gel through thermodynamic control .97 6.4 Control of fibroblast morphology and phenotype with varied fiber rigidity .100 viii 6.5 Discussion on regulation of fibroblast activation state through thermodynamicsdriven modification of collagen .104 6.6 Conclusion on regulation of fibroblast activation state through thermodynamicsdriven modification of collagen .105 PEGDA-PEI hydrogels with tunable mechanical and drug release properties .107 7.1 Synthesis of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .108 7.2 Tuning mechanical properties of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .110 7.3 Tuning degradation of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .111 7.4 In vitro drug release assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .117 7.5 Cytotoxicity assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .118 7.6 In vivo drug release assay of PEGDA-PEI hydrogels 120 7.7 Stem cell mobilization with PEGDA-PEI hydrogels .122 7.8 Discussion on PEGDA-PEI hydrogels with tunable mechanical and drug release properties .125 7.9 Conclusion on PEGDA-PEI hydrogels with tunable mechanical and drug release properties .127 Conclusions and future prospects 128 8.1 Development of 3D cell-instructive microenvironmental scaffold cues .129 8.2 Design of novel delivery vehicles to regulate soluble cell-instructive cues 131 8.3 Future developments 131 ix Bibliography .133 Publications 146 x 8.2 Design of novel delivery vehicles to regulate soluble cell-instructive cues For the second part of this work, we fabricated stiff and metastable PEGDA-PEI hydrogels for the release of cytokines and drugs in vivo. The high stiffness of the material, attained from the highly branched architecture of PEI, allowed the hydrogel to release encapsulated substances independent of local tissue pressures. The decoupled control of degradation rate was achieved by tuning the number of protonated amine groups of the hydrogel. Following synthesis, the hydrogel was extensively characterized in terms of its mechanical properties, degradation, cytotoxicity, in vitro and in vivo drug release. This hydrogel system was also successfully used as an injectable GCSF delivery system, enabling sustained mobilization of stem and progenitor cells into circulation. We expect that the degradation rates of the hydrogels developed in this study may be further controlled over a broader range by altering the precursor mass fractions and chemical modification of PEI. These modifications can be made to suit different delivery needs and applications. Due to its injectability and ease of application, we believe this hydrogel can also be readily combined with cell-instructive scaffolds to generate integrated tissue engineering systems. 8.3 Future developments Having developed the cell-instructive scaffolds, the next phase of this study can be to modify these scaffolds to provide cell-instruction to other cell types. This should be achievable by tuning different parameters such as cross-linking density and fiber diameter to match the target tissues. The drug delivery vehicle formed from PEGDA and 131 PEI can also be modified to generate a variety of release windows for the release of other cytokines. In addition, the integration of both scaffold and drug delivery vehicles for integrated tissue engineering approaches can also be explored. Due to the flexibility of the system, many possible applications can be devised. For example, the encapsulation and delivery of endothelial cells may be coupled with the provision of pro-angiogenic growth factors such as VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor to improve the vascularization at an ischemic area. Mesenchymal stem cells in suitable 3D cell- instructive scaffolds can also be provided with various differentiation factors to promote the differentiation of the mesenchymal stem cells in situ. Such a strategy will be useful for the endogenous repair of damaged tissues and the restoration of lost tissue function. As this study only provided a preliminary examination of how scaffold and delivery vehicles can be customized to provide cell-instruction, there needs to be further investigations to optimize scaffold properties and delivery windows for each intended application. 132 Bibliography [1] Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chemical reviews. 2001;101:1869-79. [2] Langer R, Vacanti J. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920-6. [3] Freed LE, Guilak F, Guo XE, Gray ML, Tranquillo R, Holmes JW, et al. Advanced tools for tissue engineering: scaffolds, bioreactors, and signaling. Tissue engineering. 2006;12:3285-305. [4] Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4337-51. [5] Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nature materials. 2009;8:457-70. [6] Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y-l. Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate. Science. 2005;310:1139-43. [7] Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2009;103:655-63. [8] Jones JR, Hench LL. Factors affecting the structure and properties of bioactive foam scaffolds for tissue engineering. Journal of biomedical materials research Part B, Applied biomaterials. 2004;68:36-44. [9] Schmidt JJ, Rowley J, Kong HJ. Hydrogels used for cell-based drug delivery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2008;87A:1113-22. [10] Martins A, Araujo JV, Reis RL, Neves NM. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2007;2:929-42. [11] Thomson RC, Yaszemski MJ, Powers JM, Mikos AG. Fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds to engineer trabecular bone. Journal of biomaterials science Polymer edition. 1995;7:23-38. [12] Jongpaiboonkit L, King WJ, Murphy WL. Screening for 3D environments that support human mesenchymal stem cell viability using hydrogel arrays. Tissue engineering Part A. 2009;15:343-53. [13] Liao SW, Yu T-B, Guan Z. De Novo Design of Saccharide−Peptide Hydrogels as Synthetic Scaffolds for Tailored Cell Responses. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:17638-46. 133 [14] Nanno K, Sugiyasu K, Daimon T, Yoshikawa H, Myoui A. Synthetic alginate is a carrier of OP-1 for bone induction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467:3149-55. [15] Spotnitz WD, Burks S. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion. 2008;48:1502-16. [16] Baumann LS, Shamban AT, Lupo MP, Monheit GD, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, et al. Comparison of Smooth-Gel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers with Cross-linked Bovine Collagen: A Multicenter, Double-Masked, Randomized, Within-Subject Study. Dermatologic Surgery. 2007;33:S128-S35. [17] Tan H, Chu CR, Payne KA, Marra KG. Injectable in situ forming biodegradable chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2499-506. [18] Li RH, Altreuter DH, Gentile FT. Transport characterization of hydrogel matrices for cell encapsulation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;50:365-73. [19] Cha C, Jeong JH, Shim J, Kong H. Tuning the dependency between stiffness and permeability of a cell encapsulating hydrogel with hydrophilic pendant chains. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3719-28. [20] Cha C, Kim SY, Cao L, Kong H. Decoupled control of stiffness and permeability with a cell-encapsulating poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4864-71. [21] Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. The Extracellular Matrix of Animals. Molecular biology of the cell: Garland Science; 2002. [22] University S. Chapter Extracellular matrix, Cell junction and cell adhension. [23] Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23:47-55. [24] Van der Rest M, Garrone R. Collagen family of proteins. Faseb J. 1991;5:2814-23. [25] Danen EHJ, Yamada KM. Fibronectin, integrins, and growth control. J Cell Physiol. 2001;189:1-13. [26] Iozzo RV. Matrix proteoglycans: From molecular design to cellular function. 1998. p. 609-52. [27] Rosso F, Giordano A, Barbarisi M, Barbarisi A. From Cell–ECM interactions to tissue engineering. J Cell Physiol. 2004;199:174-80. 134 [28] Hynes RO. Integrins: Bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673-87. [29] Gallant ND, Michael KE, Garcia AJ. Cell adhesion strengthening: contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding, and focal adhesion assembly. Molecular biology of the cell. 2005;16:4329-40. [30] Mager MD, LaPointe V, Stevens MM. Exploring and exploiting chemistry at the cell surface. Nat Chem. 2011;3:582-9. [31] Lim JY, Donahue HJ. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue engineering. 2007;13:1879-91. [32] Teo BK, Ankam S, Chan LY, Yim EK. Nanotopography/mechanical induction of stem-cell differentiation. Methods in cell biology. 2010;98:241-94. [33] Miyahara Y, Nagaya N, Kataoka M, Yanagawa B, Tanaka K, Hao H, et al. Monolayered mesenchymal stem cells repair scarred myocardium after myocardial infarction. Nat Med. 2006;12:459-65. [34] McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Developmental Cell. 2004;6:483-95. [35] Prabhakaran MP, Venugopal JR, Ramakrishna S. Mesenchymal stem cell differentiation to neuronal cells on electrospun nanofibrous substrates for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4996-5003. [36] Arnold M, Hirschfeld-Warneken VC, Lohmüller T, Heil P, Blümmel J, CavalcantiAdam EA, et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. Nano letters. 2008;8:2063-9. [37] Christopherson GT, Song H, Mao HQ. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2009;30:556-64. [38] Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell. 2006;126:677-89. [39] Provenzano PP, Keely PJ. Mechanical signaling through the cytoskeleton regulates cell proliferation by coordinated focal adhesion and Rho GTPase signaling. Journal of cell science. 2011;124:1195-205. [40] Docheva D, Padula D, Popov C, Mutschler W, Clausen-Schaumann H, Schieker M. Researching into the cellular shape, volume and elasticity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells by atomic force microscopy: Stem Cells. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2008;12:537-52. 135 [41] Miranti CK, Brugge JS. Sensing the environment: A historical perspective on integrin signal transduction. Nature cell biology. 2002;4:E83-E90. [42] Lecuit T, Le Goff L. Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature. 2007;450:189-92. [43] Wang Y, Riechmann V. The role of the actomyosin cytoskeleton in coordination of tissue growth during Drosophila oogenesis. Current biology : CB. 2007;17:1349-55. [44] Yu H, Mouw JK, Weaver VM. Forcing form and function: Biomechanical regulation of tumor evolution. Trends in Cell Biology. 2011;21:47-56. [45] Adams DS, Keller R, Koehl MA. The mechanics of notochord elongation, straightening and stiffening in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. Development. 1990;110:115-30. [46] Evans ND, Minelli C, Gentleman E, LaPointe V, Patankar SN, Kallivretaki M, et al. Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. European cells & materials. 2009;18:1-13; discussion -4. [47] Liu F, Mih JD, Shea BS, Kho AT, Sharif AS, Tager AM, et al. Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression. Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;190:693-706. [48] Manduca A, Oliphant TE, Dresner MA, Mahowald JL, Kruse SA, Amromin E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Medical Image Analysis. 2001;5:237-54. [49] Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, Knittel JG, Yan L, Rueden CT, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Medicine. 2008;6. [50] Kass L, Erler JT, Dembo M, Weaver VM. Mammary epithelial cell: Influence of extracellular matrix composition and organization during development and tumorigenesis. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2007;39:1987-94. [51] Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:241-54. [52] Tilghman RW, Cowan CR, Mih JD, Koryakina Y, Gioeli D, Slack-Davis JK, et al. Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12905. [53] Indra I, Beningo KA. An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity, substrate rigidity, and ECM composition. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2011;112:3151-8. 136 [54] Cheng G, Tse J, Jain RK, Munn LL. Micro-Environmental Mechanical Stress Controls Tumor Spheroid Size and Morphology by Suppressing Proliferation and Inducing Apoptosis in Cancer Cells. PloS one. 2009;4:e4632. [55] Samuel MS, Lopez JI, McGhee EJ, Croft DR, Strachan D, Timpson P, et al. Actomyosin-mediated cellular tension drives increased tissue stiffness and beta-catenin activation to induce epidermal hyperplasia and tumor growth. Cancer cell. 2011;19:77691. [56] Georges PC, Hui JJ, Gombos Z, McCormick ME, Wang AY, Uemura M, et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2007;293:G114754. [57] Huang X, Yang N, Fiore VF, Barker TH, Sun Y, Morris SW, et al. Matrix StiffnessInduced Myofibroblast Differentiation Is Mediated by Intrinsic Mechanotransduction. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology. 2012. [58] Hinz B, Pittet P, Smith-Clerc J, Chaponnier C, Meister JJ. Myofibroblast development is characterized by specific cell-cell adherens junctions. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:4310-20. [59] Liu F, Mih JD, Shea BS, Kho AT, Sharif AS, Tager AM, et al. Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;190:693-706. [60] Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Galli A, Bochaton-Piallat M-L, Gabbiani G. The Myofibroblast: One Function, Multiple Origins. The American journal of pathology. 2007;170:1807-16. [61] Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown RA. Myofibroblasts and mechano: Regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2002;3:349-63. [62] Guyot C, Lepreux S, Combe C, Doudnikoff E, Bioulac-Sage P, Balabaud C, et al. Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis: The (myo)fibroblastic cell subpopulations involved. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2006;38:135-51. [63] LeBrasseur N. Best stiffness for striation. The Journal of cell biology. 2004;166:760. [64] Jacot JG, Dianis S, Schnall J, Wong JY. A simple microindentation technique for mapping the microscale compliance of soft hydrated materials and tissues. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A. 2006;79:485-94. [65] Gefen A, Margulies SS. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? Journal of biomechanics. 2004;37:1339-52. 137 [66] Branco MC, Nettesheim F, Pochan DJ, Schneider JP, Wagner NJ. Fast dynamics of semiflexible chain networks of self-assembled peptides. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:1374-80. [67] Burke DP, Kelly DJ. Substrate stiffness and oxygen as regulators of stem cell differentiation during skeletal tissue regeneration: a mechanobiological model. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40737. [68] Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate Compliance versus Ligand Density in Cell on Gel Responses. Biophysical journal. 2004;86:617-28. [69] Pereira D, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira J, Reis R. Hydrogels in acellular and cellular strategies for intervertebral disc regeneration. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. 2011. [70] Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cellladen microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31:5536-44. [71] Rafat M, Li F, Fagerholm P, Lagali NS, Watsky MA, Munger R, et al. PEGstabilized carbodiimide crosslinked collagen–chitosan hydrogels for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3960-72. [72] Dong Y, Hassan W, Zheng Y, Saeed AO, Cao H, Tai H, et al. Thermoresponsive hyperbranched copolymer with multi acrylate functionality for in situ cross-linkable hyaluronic acid composite semi-IPN hydrogel. Journal of materials science Materials in medicine. 2012;23:25-35. [73] Orban JM, Wilson LB, Kofroth JA, El-Kurdi MS, Maul TM, Vorp DA. Crosslinking of collagen gels by transglutaminase. Journal of biomedical materials research Part A. 2004;68:756-62. [74] Elbjeirami WM, Yonter EO, Starcher BC, West JL. Enhancing mechanical properties of tissue-engineered constructs via lysyl oxidase crosslinking activity. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2003;66A:513-21. [75] Reddy GK. Cross-Linking in Collagen by Nonenzymatic Glycation Increases the Matrix Stiffness in Rabbit Achilles Tendon. Experimental Diabesity Research. 2004;5:143-53. [76] Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue engineering Part B, Reviews. 2008;14:149-65. [77] Raub CB, Suresh V, Krasieva T, Lyubovitsky J, Mih JD, Putnam AJ, et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Collagen Gel Microstructure and Mechanics Using Multiphoton Microscopy. Biophysical journal. 2007;92:2212-22. 138 [78] Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2603-10. [79] Hemmrich K, von Heimburg D, Rendchen R, Di Bartolo C, Milella E, Pallua N. Implantation of preadipocyte-loaded hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds into nude mice to evaluate potential for soft tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7025-37. [80] Chan BP, Leong KW. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2008;17 Suppl 4:467-79. [81] Zanatta G, Steffens D, Braghirolli DI, Fernandes RA, Netto CA, Pranke P. Viability of mesenchymal stem cells during electrospinning. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45:125-30. [82] Lutolf MP, Lauer-Fields JL, Schmoekel HG, Metters AT, Weber FE, Fields GB, et al. Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: Engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100:5413-8. [83] Shu XZ, Liu Y, Luo Y, Roberts MC, Prestwich GD. Disulfide cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3:1304-11. [84] Yoshikawa HY, Rossetti FF, Kaufmann S, Kaindl T, Madsen J, Engel U, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Mechanosensing of Cells on Dynamically Tunable Hydrogels. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2011;133:1367-74. [85] Kloxin AM, Kasko AM, Salinas CN, Anseth KS. Photodegradable Hydrogels for Dynamic Tuning of Physical and Chemical Properties. Science. 2009;324:59-63. [86] Patino MG, Neiders ME, Andreana S, Noble B, Cohen RE. Collagen as an implantable material in medicine and dentistry. The Journal of oral implantology. 2002;28:220-5. [87] Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA. Collagen fibril formation. The Biochemical journal. 1996;316 ( Pt 1):1-11. [88] Roy R, Boskey A, Bonassar LJ. Processing of type I collagen gels using nonenzymatic glycation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2010;93A:843-51. [89] Barbani N, Giusti P, Lazzeri L, Polacco G, Pizzirani G. Bioartificial materials based on collagen: 1. Collagen cross-linking with gaseous glutaraldehyde. Journal of biomaterials science Polymer edition. 1995;7:461-9. 139 [90] Lee CR, Grodzinsky AJ, Spector M. The effects of cross-linking of collagenglycosaminoglycan scaffolds on compressive stiffness, chondrocyte-mediated contraction, proliferation and biosynthesis. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3145-54. [91] Schoof H, Apel J, Heschel I, Rau G. Control of pore structure and size in freezedried collagen sponges. Journal of biomedical materials research. 2001;58:352-7. [92] Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC. Liver regeneration. Science. 1997;276:60-6. [93] Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB, Mooney DJ. Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:1029-34. [94] Chamekh M, Phalipon A, Quertainmont R, Salmon I, Sansonetti P, Allaoui A. Delivery of biologically active anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-1ra in vivo by the Shigella type III secretion apparatus. J Immunol. 2008;180:4292-8. [95] Boisguerin P, Redt-Clouet C, Franck-Miclo A, Licheheb S, Nargeot J, BarrereLemaire S, et al. Systemic delivery of BH4 anti-apoptotic peptide using CPPs prevents cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injuries in vivo. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2011;156:146-53. [96] Theiss HD, Vallaster M, Rischpler C, Krieg L, Zaruba MM, Brunner S, et al. Dual stem cell therapy after myocardial infarction acts specifically by enhanced homing via the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. Stem Cell Res. 2011;7:244-55. [97] Bedair H, Liu TT, Kaar JL, Badlani S, Russell AJ, Li Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 therapy improves muscle healing. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007;102:2338-45. [98] Seeherman H, Wozney J, Li R. Bone morphogenetic protein delivery systems. Spine. 2002;27:S16-23. [99] Ravi Kumar MN. Nano and microparticles as controlled drug delivery devices. Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences [electronic resource] : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques. 2000;3:234-58. [100] Chan JM, Zhang L, Yuet KP, Liao G, Rhee JW, Langer R, et al. PLGA-lecithinPEG core-shell nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1627-34. [101] Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2000;50:27-46. [102] Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2002;54:3-12. [103] Lin CC, Anseth KS. PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharmaceutical research. 2009;26:631-43. 140 [104] Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC. Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Molecular pharmaceutics. 2008;5:505-15. [105] Zhang S, Li J, Lykotrafitis G, Bao G, Suresh S. Size-Dependent Endocytosis of Nanoparticles. Adv Mater. 2009;21:419-24. [106] Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream. Science. 2004;303:1818-22. [107] Dhar S, Daniel WL, Giljohann DA, Mirkin CA, Lippard SJ. Polyvalent Oligonucleotide Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates as Delivery Vehicles for Platinum(IV) Warheads. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:14652-3. [108] Zhang S, Uludağ H. Nanoparticulate Systems for Growth Factor Delivery. Pharmaceutical research. 2009;26:1561-80. [109] Koria P, Yagi H, Kitagawa Y, Megeed Z, Nahmias Y, Sheridan R, et al. Selfassembling elastin-like peptides growth factor chimeric nanoparticles for the treatment of chronic wounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108:1034-9. [110] Chen W, Tabata Y, Tong YW. Fabricating tissue engineering scaffolds for simultaneous cell growth and drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:2388-94. [111] Sheridan MH, Shea LD, Peters MC, Mooney DJ. Bioabsorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering capable of sustained growth factor delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2000;64:91-102. [112] Wenk E, Meinel AJ, Wildy S, Merkle HP, Meinel L. Microporous silk fibroin scaffolds embedding PLGA microparticles for controlled growth factor delivery in tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2571-81. [113] Ueda H, Hong L, Yamamoto M, Shigeno K, Inoue M, Toba T, et al. Use of collagen sponge incorporating transforming growth factor-beta1 to promote bone repair in skull defects in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1003-10. [114] Jin Q, Wei G, Lin Z, Sugai JV, Lynch SE, Ma PX, et al. Nanofibrous Scaffolds Incorporating PDGF-BB Microspheres Induce Chemokine Expression and Tissue Neogenesis In Vivo. PloS one. 2008;3:e1729. [115] Banerjee I, Mishra D, Maiti TK. PLGA Microspheres Incorporated Gelatin Scaffold: Microspheres Modulate Scaffold Properties. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2009;2009. [116] Schofer MD, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Grabedunkel C, Wack C, Dersch R, Rudisile M, et al. Influence of poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers and BMP-2-containing poly(L-lactic acid) nanofibers on growth and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2008;8:1269-79. 141 [117] Gaballa MA, Sunkomat JN, Thai H, Morkin E, Ewy G, Goldman S. Grafting an acellular 3-dimensional collagen scaffold onto a non-transmural infarcted myocardium induces neo-angiogenesis and reduces cardiac remodeling. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2006;25:946-54. [118] Liang Y, Jeong J, DeVolder RJ, Cha C, Wang F, Tong YW, et al. A cell-instructive hydrogel to regulate malignancy of 3D tumor spheroids with matrix rigidity. Biomaterials. 2011;32:9308-15. [119] Dagdas YS, Tombuloglu A, Tekinay AB, Dana A, Guler MO. Interfiber interactions alter the stiffness of gels formed by supramolecular self-assembled nanofibers. Soft Matter. 2011;7:3524-32. [120] Lee KY, Ha WS. DSC studies on bound water in silk fibroin/S-carboxymethyl kerateine blend films. Polymer. 1999;40:4131-4. [121] Graham NB, Zulfiqar M, Nwachuku NE, Rashid A. Interaction of poly(ethylene oxide) with solvents: 2. Water-poly(ethylene glycol). Polymer. 1989;30:528-33. [122] Liang Y, Jensen TW, Roy EJ, Cha C, DeVolder RJ, Kohman RE, et al. Tuning the non-equilibrium state of a drug-encapsulated poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel for stem and progenitor cell mobilization. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2004-12. [123] Kong HJ, Alsberg E, Kaigler D, Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Controlling Degradation of Hydrogels via the Size of Crosslinked Junctions. Advanced Materials. 2004;16:1917-21. [124] Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. Journal of Controlled Release. 1987;5:37-42. [125] Alfrey T, Gurnee EF, Lloyd WG. Diffusion in glassy polymers. Journal of Polymer Science Part C: Polymer Symposia. 1966;12:249-61. [126] Korsmeyer R, Peppas NA. Macromolecular and modeling aspects of swelling controlled system in controlled release delivery systems. In: Kydonieus AF, editor. Treatise on controlled drug delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992. p. 196. [127] Quijada-Garrido I, Prior-Cabanillas A, Garrido L, Barrales-Rienda JM. Swelling monitorization of poly[(N-isopropylacrylamide)-co-(methacrylic acid)] copolymers by magnetic resonance imaging. Macromolecules. 2005;38:7434-42. [128] Lee HB, Jhon MS, Andrade JD. Nature of water in synthetic hydrogels. I. Dilatometry, specific conductivity, and differential scanning calorimetry of polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate. Journal of colloid and interface science. 1975;51:225-31. 142 [129] Tritt-Goc J, Kowalczuk J, Piślewski N. MRI study of Fickian, case II and anomalous diffusion of solvents into hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Applied Magnetic Resonance. 2005;29:605-15. [130] Patel PN, Smith CK, Patrick Jr CW. Rheological and recovery properties of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels and human adipose tissue. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A. 2005;73:313-9. [131] Yoneda M, Fujita K, Inamori M, Nakajima A, Tamano M, Hiraishi H. Transient elastography in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [14]. Gut. 2007;56:1330-1. [132] Vempati P, Mac Gabhann F, Popel AS. Quantifying the proteolytic release of extracellular matrix-sequestered VEGF with a computational model. PloS one. 2010;5. [133] Baker EL, Bonnecaze RT, Zaman MH. Extracellular matrix stiffness and architecture govern intracellular rheology in cancer. Biophysical journal. 2009;97:101321. [134] Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: Mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2009;10:75-82. [135] Wang F, Hansen RK, Radisky D, Yoneda T, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Petersen OW, et al. Phenotypic Reversion or Death of Cancer Cells by Altering Signaling Pathways in Three-Dimensional Contexts. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94:1494-503. [136] Pecina-Slaus N. Tumor suppressor gene E-cadherin and its role in normal and malignant cells. Cancer cell international. 2003;3:17. [137] Brieva TA, Moghe PV. Functional engineering of hepatocytes via heterocellular presentation of a homoadhesive molecule, E-cadherin. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2001;76:295-302. [138] Ho JC, Cheung ST, Leung KL, Ng IO, Fan ST. Decreased expression of cytochrome P450 2E1 is associated with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2004;111:494-500. [139] Shemirani B, Crowe DL. Hypoxic induction of HIF-1α and VEGF expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma lines is mediated by stress activated protein kinases. Oral oncology. 2002;38:251-7. [140] Mellott MB, Searcy K, Pishko MV. Release of protein from highly cross-linked hydrogels of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate fabricated by UV polymerization. Biomaterials. 2001;22:929-41. 143 [141] Ohuchi E, Imai K, Fujii Y, Sato H, Seiki M, Okada Y. Membrane Type Matrix Metalloproteinase Digests Interstitial Collagens and Other Extracellular Matrix Macromolecules. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272:2446-51. [142] Rundhaug JE. Matrix Metalloproteinases, Angiogenesis, and Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 2003;9:551-4. [143] Gillies AR, Lieber RL. Structure and function of the skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Muscle & nerve. 2011;44:318-31. [144] Sionkowska A, Skopinska-Wisniewska J, Wisniewski M. Collagen-synthetic polymer interactions in solution and in thin films. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2009;145:135-8. [145] Sionkowska A. The influence of UV light on collagen/poly(ethylene glycol) blends. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2006;91:305-12. [146] Buxboim A, Rajagopal K, Brown AEX, Discher DE. How deeply cells feel: Methods for thin gels. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 2010;22. [147] Maloney JM, Walton EB, Bruce CM, Van Vliet KJ. Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2008;78. [148] Liang Y, Jeong J, DeVolder RJ, Cha C, Wang F, Tong YW, et al. A cell-instructive hydrogel to regulate malignancy of 3D tumor spheroids with matrix rigidity. Biomaterials. 2011;32:9308-15. [149] Tierney CM, Haugh MG, Liedl J, Mulcahy F, Hayes B, O'Brien FJ. The effects of collagen concentration and crosslink density on the biological, structural and mechanical properties of collagen-GAG scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2009;2:202-9. [150] Watanabe K, Nakamura M, Okano H, Toyama Y. Establishment of threedimensional culture of neural stem/progenitor cells in collagen Type-1 Gel. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:109-17. [151] Weber LM, Lopez CG, Anseth KS. Effects of PEG hydrogel crosslinking density on protein diffusion and encapsulated islet survival and function. Journal of biomedical materials research Part A. 2009;90:720-9. [152] Hinz B. Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:526-37. [153] Balestrini JL, Chaudhry S, Sarrazy V, Koehler A, Hinz B. The mechanical memory of lung myofibroblasts. Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro. 2012;4:410-21. 144 [154] Zijlstra A, Mikolon D, Stupack DG. Angiogenesis assays in the chick. In: Staton C, Lewis CE, Bicknell RJ, Bicknell R, editors. Angiogenesis assays: a critical appraisal of current techniques, : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2007. p. 183. [155] Lemoli RM, D'Addio A. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Haematologica. 2008;93:321-4. [156] Gong JP, Katsuyama Y, Kurokawa T, Osada Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Advanced Materials. 2003;15:1155-8. [157] Tang Q, Sun X, Li Q, Wu J, Lin J. A simple route to interpenetrating network hydrogel with high mechanical strength. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2009;339:45-52. [158] Okumura Y, Ito K. The polyrotaxane gel: A topological gel by figure-of-eight cross-links. Advanced Materials. 2001;13:485-7. [159] Haraguchi K, Takehisa T, Fan S. Effects of clay content on the properties of nanocomposite hydrogels composed of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and clay. Macromolecules. 2002;35:10162-71. [160] Ceylan D, Okay O. Macroporous polyisobutylene gels: A novel tough organogel with superfast responsivity. Macromolecules. 2007;40:8742-9. [161] Buzzeo MP, Yang J, Casella G, Reddy V. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF induces innate inflammation yet suppresses adaptive immune gene expression as revealed by microarray analysis. Experimental Hematology. 2007;35:145665. 145 Publications 1. Q.X. Xu, Y. Liang, Y.W. Tong, et. al., ‘Design project on controlled release drug delivery devices: Implementation, management, and learning experiences’, Chemical Engineering Education (2010) 2. Y. Liang, T.W. Jensen, E.J. Roy, et.al., ‘Tuning the non-equilibrium state of a drugencapsulated poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel for stem and progenitor cell mobilization’, Biomaterials (2010) 3. Y. Liang, R.J. Devolder, and H. Kong, ‘Treating Cardiovascular Diseases by Enhancing Endogenous Stem Cell Mobilization’, Book Chapter in Stem Cells and Revascularization Therapies, Published by CRC Press (2011) 4. Y. Liang, J.H. Jeong, R.J. DeVolder, et. al., ‘A cell-instructive hydrogel to regulate malignancy of 3D tumor spheroids with matrix rigidity’, Biomaterials (2011) 5. J.H. Jeong, Y. Liang, M. Jang, et. al., ‘Stiffness-Modulated Water Retention and Neovascularization of Dermal Fibroblast-Encapsulating Collagen Gel ’, Tissue Engineering Part A (2013) 6. Y. Liang, H. Kong, and Y.W. Tong, ‘Generation of cell-instructive collagen gels through thermodynamic control’, (In preparation) 146 [...]... this work is to design and engineer an integrated tissue engineering approach that combines microenvironmental scaffold cues with soluble factor cues so as to enhance cell- instruction and tissue regeneration In order for this aim to be accomplished, we started off by separately examining the control of microenvironmental cues and the regulation of soluble factor cues both in vitro and in vivo In the earlier... specialized requirements of cell- instructive tissue engineering scaffolds, we hypothesized that collagen hydrogels can be imparted with suitable mechanical and structural cues for cell- instruction 2 2) These cues can be introduced through different means i.e chemical modification, enzymatic degradation, and tuning the thermodynamic driving force for collagen self-assembly 3) The modified scaffolds, presenting... in tissue engineering Cells are harvested from donor and expanded in vitro to generate more cells These cells can then be combined with scaffolds and growth factors to form engineered tissues for implantation Several factors are crucial in determining the success of a tissue engineering approach These include the availability and viability of donor cells, the bioavailability 7 and the activity of the... Cell- instructive tissue engineering scaffolds Traditionally, tissue engineering scaffolds have been designed with the sole purpose of providing structure and support for cell delivery It has since become apparent that engineered scaffolds can be designed to carry out many other functions in the body.[1, 3, 4] With the right topographical cues, scaffolds can be used to direct cell organization.[3, 5]... availability of bioactive molecules and cytokines can be regulated through encapsulation or tethering.[1] Recent studies have also demonstrated the crucial role of scaffold mechanics in regulating cell signaling and cell cycle.[6] Apart from use in tissue engineering and regeneration applications, these scaffolds are also increasingly used for both cell culture and fundamental science research, in... matrices for 3D culture, it is essential to keep in mind the key requirements for 3D cell culture scaffolds, specific considerations for the study at hand, and the cells’ native microenvironment For basic science studies investigating the 14 cell- ECM interactions, it may be crucial to have good control over specific parameters of interests while minimally affecting other parameters However, for tissue... mimic the native ECM and promote cell- mediated matrix remodeling All-in-all, it is paramount for tissue engineers to be equipped with a sound understanding of the native ECM before embarking on hydrogel scaffold design and fabrication 2.5 Native ECM Before designing 3D hydrogel scaffolds, it is essential to have a sound understanding of the native ECM in terms of its unique structure and function The ECM... tissue engineering and tissue regeneration have emerged as promising alternative strategies.[1, 2] Tissue engineering involves the engineering and repair of tissues and organs.[2] An overview of the main features in engineered tissues is presented in the following figure (Fig 2.1) The general approach in tissue engineering involves the harvesting of cells from a donor These cells are usually expanded... viability of encapsulated cells but might result in compromised cell proliferation, function and spreading Such gels are usually generated from synthetic polymers such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA).[1, 7] Although these materials do not inherently promote cell function, they can be customizable to present appropriate ligands for cell adhesion and cell- signaling.[7, 12] There... phenotypes would be enabled On top of the microenvironmental cues, this study further looked into the design of tailored controlled release vehicles to enable better regulation of local soluble cues Through the customization of both scaffold and soluble cues, we aimed to achieve greater control of key cellular events for different tissue engineering applications 1.2 Hypotheses The key hypotheses in . ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD AND SOLUBLE CUES FOR CELL- INSTRUCTION LIANG YOUYUN B.Eng. (Hons.), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF NUS-UIUC JOINT. integrated tissue engineering approach that combines microenvironmental scaffold cues with soluble factor cues so as to enhance cell- instruction and tissue regeneration. In order for this aim to. microenvironmental scaffold cues and soluble factors cues covered in this thesis would provide an important stepping stone for the subsequent combination of these cues in integrated tissue regeneration and cell- instructive