Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 223 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
223
Dung lượng
4,59 MB
Nội dung
DETERMINANTSOF EDUCATIONALATTAINMENTINEGYPTANDMENA: A MICROECONOMETRIC APPROACH MENSHAWYGALALMOHAMEDBADR BSc(Hons),MSc ThesissubmittedtotheUniversityofNottingham forthedegreeofDoctorofPhilosophy July,2012 Abstract UsingTIMSSdatasetonMENA countries,thisstudyexaminesthedeterminantsof educational outcome and gender inequality of learning in eight selected countries. The complicated structure ofthedatahasbeen considered carefully duringall the stages of the analysis employing plausible values and jackknife standard error technique to accommodate the measurement error of the dependant variable and theclusteringofstudentsinclassesandschools. The education production functions provide broad evidence from mean and quantile analysis of very low returns to schooling; few school variables are significantandnonehaveeffectsacrosscountriesandquantiles.Ingeneral,student characteristicswerefarmoreimportantthanschoolfactorsinexplainingtestscores, buttherewasconsiderablevariabilityacrosscountriesinwhichspecificfactors were significant. Strikingly, computer usage was found to influence students’ performance negatively in six MENA countries. Only Turkey and Iran had a significantpositiveeffectofcomputerusageonmathsachievements. Genderinequalityofacademicachievementhasbeeninvestigatedthoroughlyusing mean and quantile decomposition analysis. There is mixed picture of gender inequality across the eight countries with three pro‐boys, three pro‐girls and two gender‐neutral. This exercise gives no general pattern of gender inequality across MENA. A detailed analysis of Egyptian students’ achievements explains the differentialgapbetweenschooltypes,notablybeingsingleormixedsexandArabic or language schools.Single‐sex schools perform better than mixed schools especially for girls. The single ‐sex language schools are more effective than the Arabicsinglesexschool.Thisconfirmsthedominanceof thelanguageschoolsand isalsorelatedtothestyleandsocial‐economicstatusofenrolledstudents. TheUniversityofNottingham ii Acknowledgements ʺAllpraiseisduetoAllah”and“whoeverdonotthankpeopledonotthankAllah” Workingonthisthesishasbeenalearningprocessthathasfarexceededanyofmy expectations.I wouldliketoacknowledgethe peoplewhohavecontributedinthis regard. FirstandforemostIoffermysincerestgratitudetomysupervisorsOliverMorrissey and Simon Appleton whose knowledge and research experience gave both scope andfocustomyownresearch.Theyputmeontherighttrack,gavemethesupport andthetimetolearnandtobeproductive.Theyopenedtheirdoorstomewithout anylimitations.WhateverIwouldsayIwillneverfulfiltheirrightsonmyself. InmydailyworkIhavebeen blessedwithafriendly andcheerful groupof fellow students.Thankstomycolleaguesattheschoolofeconomics;specialthanksgoesto Paul Atherton, Festus Ebo Turkson, Emmanuel Ammisah and Zehang Wang. I wouldlikealso tothanktheUniversityofNottinghamfortheirhospitalityandthe great facilities they offer to accommodate the different cultures and religions. I wouldliketothankSarahNolan,postgraduatesecretary,forherhelpwhichstarted evenbeforemyarrivaltotheUKandcontinuestillthisday. Iwouldalsoliketothankmyfamilyforthesupport theyprovidedmethroughmy entire life and in particular, I must acknowledge my wife and my son, Mohamed, without their love, encouragement and patience, I would not have finished this thesis. In conclusion, I would like to express my gratitude to my country Eg ypt and I recognize that this research would not have been possible without the financial supportandScholarshipfundfrommylovelycountryEgypt. TheUniversityofNottingham iii Dedication To my wife, my children Mohamed and Maryam, Also special dedication to my grandma, and my family I also dedicate this thesis to the brave youth of the 25 th of January revolution in Egypt. TheUniversityofNottingham iv TableofContents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Dedication iv Chapter1INTRODUCTIONANDLITERATUREREVIEW 1 1.1Introduction 1 1.2LiteratureReview 3 1.2.1EstimationproblemsofEPFandpossiblesolutions 7 1.2.2Inequalityineducation 8 Chapter2OVERVIEWOFTHEDATA 14 2.1TheTIMSSstudentperformancedata 14 2.2TIMSSsampledesign 15 2.3TIMSSanalysisandcomplexityofthedata 16 2.3.1ComputingSamplingvarianceusingtheJRRtechnique 16 2.3.2PlausibleValues(PVs) 17 2.4MENAcharacteristics 19 2.5ComparativedescriptivestatisticsforMENAcountriesinTIMSS 23 2.5.1InternationalBenchmarks 26 Chapter3EDUCATIONALATTAINMENTDETERMINANTSINMENA 91 3.1Introduction 91 3.2Background 93 3.3LiteratureReview 96 3.4Empiricalmodel 99 3.4.1EducationProductionFunction(EPF) 100 TheUniversityofNottingham v 3.4.2MetaRegressionAnalysis(MRA) 101 3.4.3Quantileregression 103 3.5Results 104 3.5.1Familybackgroundsandstudentperformance 104 3.5.2Schoolresources,teachercharacteristicsandperformance 110 3.5.2.1Schoolfixedeffects 112 3.5.3Meta‐Analysisresults 112 3.5.3.1Thehomeinfluenceonperformance: 113 3.5.3.2Computerusagereducesperformance 118 3.5.3.3Theschoolinfluenceonperformance 118 3.5.4 Quantile Regressions: Heterogeneity of Covariates Effects by Performance (ability) 119 3.6Conclusion 121 AppendixA‐3:QuantileEstimates 126 Chapter4GENDERDIFFERENTIALSINMATHSTESTSCORESINMENA 132 4.1Introduction 132 4.2GenderInequalityinEducation:ContextandMENA 136 4.2.1TestScorePerformanceinMENACountries 136 4.3Methods 141 4.3.1TheOaxaca‐BlinderDecompositionFramework 142 4.3.2Meandecomposition 144 4.3.3QuantileDecomposition 146 4.3.3.1RecenteredInfluenceFunctionRIF(unconditionalquantiles) 146 4.3.3.2RecenteredInfluenceFunctionRIFandReweighting 148 4.4Empiricalresults 150 TheUniversityofNottingham vi 4.4.1Decompositionresultsofthemeangendergap 151 4.4.2Decompositionresultsalongtheeducationalachievementdistribution.154 4.4.3 Quantile decomposition results for Saudi Arabia and Iran (without teachers’variables) 161 4.5Conclusion 162 AppendixA‐4:MeanDecompositions 165 AppendixB‐4:QuantileDecompositions 174 AppendixC‐4:QuantileDecompositionDo‐file 193 Chapter5SCHOOLEFFECTSONSTUDENTSTESTSCORESINEGYPT 29 5.1Introduction 29 5.2Egypt’seducationsystem 30 5.3Dataanddescriptivestatistics 32 5.3.1EgyptinTIMSS2007 32 5.3.2Descriptivestatisticsonhomebackgroundandschoolresources 36 5.4TheEmpiricalmodel 42 5.5MainResults 43 5.5.1Studentsbackground 43 5.5.1.1Parentaleducation 43 5.5.1.2Homepossessionsandbooksathome:Socio‐EconomicStatus(SES).46 5.5.1.3Nationalityandhomespokenlanguage 47 5.5.1.4GenderDifferences 48 5.5.1.5TypeofcommunityandPovertyLevels 48 5.5.1.6Computerusageandgameconsoles 48 5.5.2TeachercharacteristicsandSchoolbackground 49 5.6Furtheranalysisusinginteractions 53 TheUniversityofNottingham vii 5.6.1Genderinteractions 54 5.6.2ParentsʹEducationandhighSES 55 5.6.3ParentsʹeducationeffectandParentalsupport 56 5.6.4Parentaleducationinteractionwithcomputerusage 57 5.7SchoolEffectsandschooltypes 58 5.7.1Schoolfixedeffects 58 5.7.2ArabicandEnglishschools 61 5.7.2.1Splittingsampleusingtestlanguage 62 5.7.2.2Testlanguagedifferenteffectonmathsandscienceachievements 64 5.7.2.3Testlanguageandhomespokenlanguage 65 5.7.3Schoolstypebysexcomposition 66 5.8Extensions 69 5.8.1Testingforaccountabilityandautonomy 69 5.9Conclusions 70 AppendixA‐5:Descriptivestatisticsandfurtherestimations 73 AppendixB‐5:Principalcomponentforhomepossessions 88 Chapter6CONCLUSIONS 197 6.1Introduction 197 6.2Summaryoffindings 198 6.3Futureresearch 201 Bibliography 202 TheUniversityofNottingham viii ListofFigures Figure 1‐1:LossintheHumanDevelopmentIndexduetoInequalitybyregions 10 Figure 2 ‐1:GrossEnrolmentRatesinMENA(1970‐2003)(%) 22 Figure 2 ‐2:MENAenrolmentratioofprimaryeducation 22 Figure 2 ‐3:PopulationPyramidinMENA,2007 28 Figure 3 ‐1:Distribut ionofstudentachievementsbysubject 33 Figure 3 ‐2:DistributionofstudentMathsachievementbyschoollanguage 34 Figure 3 ‐3:Distribut ionofstudentMathsachievementbygender 34 Figure 3 ‐4:Distribut ionofstudentScienceachievementbyschoollanguage 35 Figure 3 ‐5:Distribut ionofstudentscienceachievementbygender 35 Figure 4 ‐1: Hanushek and Woessmann estimates of the test scores relation to Growth 94 Figure 4 ‐2:MathstestscoresandGDPpercapitaforTIMSSselectedcountries 95 Figure 4 ‐3: Maths test scores and GDP per capita for TIMSS (without high income Araboilcountries) 95 Figure 4 ‐4: Forest plot displaying an inverse‐variance weighted fixed effect meta‐ analysisfortheeffectofeducationdeterminantsonstudentperformance 114 Figure 4 ‐5: Forest plot displaying an inverse‐variance weighted fixed effect meta‐ analysisfortheeffectofeducationdeterminantsonstudentperformance 115 Figure 4 ‐6: Forest plot displaying an inverse‐variance weighted fixed effect meta‐ analysisfortheeffectofeducationdeterminantsonstudentperformance 116 Figure 4 ‐7: Forest plot displaying an inverse‐variance weighted fixed effect meta‐ analysisfortheeffectofeducationdeterminantsonstudentperformance 117 Figure 5 ‐1:GenderInequalityIndex(GII),1995and2008 132 Figure 5 ‐2:TestscoresdistributionbygenderacrossMENAcountries 135 Figure 5 ‐3:TestscoresgapbetweenboysandgirlsinMENAacrossquantiles 139 TheUniversityofNottingham ix Figure 5 ‐4:Relativedistribution ofmathstestscoresinMENAcountriesbygender (boysasreference) 140 TheUniversityofNottingham x [...]... dataset, first conducted in 1995 by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), an independent international cooperative of national research institutions and government agencies. Members of the IEA are top educational research institutions from participating countries in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, Middle East, North Africa, and ... fields of study at higher levels of education between boys and girls. Streaming based on girls’ advantage in reading and literacy and boys’ perceived advantage in maths can affect choice and success in subjects and earnings after graduation. Another reason for skill differences is related to gender combination of teachers and students. Parental and social prejudices about field of study and future occupations ... growth in addition to having adverse social implications (Alderman et al. 1996; Alderman and King 1998). Allowing for the impact of female education on fertility and education of the next generation, girls have higher marginal (social) returns to education (Klasen and Lamanna 2009). Thus, discrimination against female education is socially costly and may be problem in MENA countries. ... Testing language Arabic Arabic Arabic Arabic Arabic Farsi Turkish Arabic, English A common factor among MENA countries is the low performance of its students in maths and science relative to international peers. Surprisingly, MENA’s lowest performing countries are among the highest in per capita income. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait exhibit poor performance in maths and science. Qatar has the ... values and an imputation variance. The average sampling variance is computed by estimating the sampling variance associated with each plausible value and averaging them. The imputation variance is determined by estimating the variance of the five estimates of using the normal method of calculating the variance: Imputation variance = (1/ 4 ) ∑ (θ 5 PV =1 i −θ ) 2 (2.4) The sampling variance is then simply the average ... 1.1 Introduction This thesis investigates the determinants of education achievement in Middle East and North Africa countries with special focus on Egypt. The determinants of education achievement are key factors affecting the quality of education and hence the human capital capacity in the developing countries. This thesis investigates the main determinants of education analysing both the ... 2007 round namely; Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, The University of Nottingham 23 Chapter 2. Overview of the Data Morocco, Oman, Palestinian National Authority, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates (Dubai), and Yemen. This study considers the eighth grade students at 8 countries: Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, and Turkey. The remaining countries are ... countries of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Libya. Second, middle income countries are some large oil exporting countries (Algeria, Iran and Iraq) as well as Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia, Morocco, Palestine and Turkey. Third, the low income countries include Djibouti, Sudan and Yemen. The largest share of MENA’s population falls in the middle income category with more ... trials to measure and quantify the effect of educational attainment and distribution on economic and social outcomes (Barro and Lee 2010) but they mostly focused on the quantity of education not on quality. The University of Nottingham 8 Chapter 1. Introduction and Literature Review Equal educational achievements for men and women have been regarded as one of the main drivers of ... school attainment and other factors. Johnes (2006) argued that growth depends on initial income, the investment to GDP ratio, school enrolment rates, schooling quality, schooling distribution, openness, growth amongst trading partners, and a measure of political stability. The quantity, quality and distribution of educational (inequality and discrimination) attainment have an impact on social outcomes, such . s beingpublicorprivate,singlesexorcoeducationanddomesticlanguageorforeign languageschoolremainsambiguous. 1.2.1 EstimationproblemsofEPFandpossiblesolutions Estimating education production functions faces a number of practical difficulties: omitted. ii Acknowledgements ʺAllpraiseisduetoAllah”and“whoeverdonotthankpeopledonotthankAllah” Workingonthis thesis hasbeenalearningprocessthathasfarexceededanyofmy expectations.I wouldliketoacknowledgethe. Mohamed, without their love, encouragement and patience, I would not have finished this thesis. In conclusion, I would like to express my gratitude to my country Eg ypt