Smog - A REPORT TO THE PEOPLE Episode 9 pot

Cl w Cl w w U X w ~ c::: 100 :> 0 J: c::: 0 80 u. :a: 0. 0. In C"! 2- 60 Cl c::: « Cl z « I- CIl 40 c::: « w > CIl > « 20 Cl Figure 8 IMPROVEMENT IN NITROGEN DIOXIDE AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN 1970 YEAR 138 75 80 Cl w Cl w w U X 100 w en a: :::l o J: a: o u. ~ Q. Q. N e Cl a: « Cl z ~ CI) a: « w >- CI) >- « Cl 80 Figure 9 IMPROVEMENT IN OXIDANT AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN (0.20 ppm) PRESENT StRATEGY (1971) / @)m 1970 YEAR 139 75 77 80 Figure 10 BREAKDOWN OF REDUCTIONS IN AUTOMOTIVE CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 7 > « 6 Cl CI) Z 0 I- PRESENT STRATEGY (1971) M 5 ~ 0 ~ w Cl X 0 \ 1 r-,""~;o" to z 4 0 2: z \\~' 0 co II: « u 3 ~otou~ w > I- ~ EQL STRATEGY #1 0 2: 0 I- 2 => « 1970 YEAR 75 77 80 140 Figure 11 @)m IMPROVEMENT IN CARBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY 80 77 75 YEAR 1970 200 300 250 o ex:: « o z « ~ ex:: « w >- CJ) >- « o ex:: o u. 2 0- 0- o o w o w w U x w !1 en ex:: ;:) o :I: N 141 Figure 12 SUPPLY AND DEMAND OF NATURAL GAS IN AUGUST 1975 FOR SOUTHERN CAliFORNIA 5.0 I- Peak Supply Level >= <! Cl 4.0 25% Auto H l- f- UJ Conversion Other- UJ u. / Interruptible Average u / Supply o::l Level ::J __ r- - - - u 3.0 I- - u. 0 1 V) 2 - Other Interruptible- 0 J J o::l 2.0 l- V) <! - Electric Power - (lnterruptiblel Cl J ~ <! ex: ::J f- 1.0 ~ <! 2 - Firm- -Firm- -Firm- @)m 1969 1975 Actual Low High Use Projection Projection 142 Figure 13 SUMMARY OF PROPANE SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANNUAL AVERAGES FOR CALIFORNIA to-' .j:>. w a: <l: w > a: w Q. (I,) J W a: a: <l: a3 U. o (I,) 2 o J J 2 w 2 <l: Q. o a: Q. 5 1968 70 72 YEAR 74 Present Demand + 8% Conversion ~ 76 78 80 Cl w Cl w w U >< w 250 C/J 0:: ::::> o ::c 0:: o LL. ~ c c 2 Cl 0:: « Cl z « f- C/J 0:: « w > C/J > « Cl 200 50 Figure 14 LONG RANGE PROJECTION OF OXIDANT AIR QUALITY FOR THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN PRESENT STRATEGY (1971) / Long Terr Growth R 4% 2% 4% 2% 1970 75 80 YEAR 144 85 90 Figure 15 Cl w Cl w w U X w ~ a:: :l o J: C~RBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY VS. EMISSIONS FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES a:: o u. 30 CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS (TONS / DAY) IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY 15,000 10,000 1964-66 Level 10,000 r'Id.Y 5000 Cf.) > <l: Cl 2: 0- 0- o c::i :! Cl a:: <l: Cl 20 2 <l: I- Cf.) a:: <l: w > 10 145 Figure 16 CARBON MONOXIDE AIR QUALITY VS. EMISSIONS FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY (TONS / DAY 10,000 1968 Level 8000 tons/day 5000 o w o w w C.J X w ~ en cr: => o :I: N o cr: <:( o :2 ~ 100 en cr: <:( w > cr: o u ~ Q Q o ~ 50 <:( o @)m 146 p(S) o Zs Figure 17 PROBABILITY THAT THE MID- DAY MAXIMUM ONE HOUR AVERAGE OXIDANT LEVEL IN CENTRAL LOS ANGELES IS GREATER THAN 10 PPHM (SUMMER) SYMBOL (;) A C • • x = MORNING HC 0.5 PPMC 1.5 PPMC 2.7 PPMC 4.0 PPMC 6.5 PPMC 10.0 PPMC 1.0 • "'" "" "" "" '" EARLY MORNING NOx PPHM (Y) .8 .j:>. J .6 @)m [...]... w ~ a: ::l 0 :I: a: 0 u :a: c c r /" Stationary Source Control 2 Cl a: /' :0 0 C'! Figure 20 0 en :0 III 0 Z OXIDANT AIR QUALITY VS EMISSIONS FOR DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES (0.20 PPM) Cl w w m s: () X w w 125 0 0 :I: Z CI> 2: ~ z Gl II: I-' r 0 II: >- . J ~ <! ex: ::J f- 1.0 ~ <! 2 - Firm- -Firm- -Firm- @)m 196 9 197 5 Actual Low High Use Projection Projection 142 Figure 13 SUMMARY OF PROPANE SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANNUAL AVERAGES FOR CALIFORNIA to- ' .j:>. w a: <l: w > a: w Q. (I,) J W a: a: <l: a3 U. o (I,) 2 o . l- f- UJ Conversion Other- UJ u. / Interruptible Average u / Supply o::l Level ::J __ r- - - - u 3.0 I- - u. 0 1 V) 2 - Other Interruptible- 0 J J o::l 2.0 l- V) <! - Electric Power - (lnterruptiblel Cl J ~ <! ex: ::J f- 1.0 ~ <! 2 - Firm- -Firm- -Firm- @)m 196 9 197 5 Actual Low High Use Projection Projection 142 Figure 13 SUMMARY. 12 SUPPLY AND DEMAND OF NATURAL GAS IN AUGUST 197 5 FOR SOUTHERN CAliFORNIA 5.0 I- Peak Supply Level >= <! Cl 4.0 25% Auto H l- f- UJ Conversion Other- UJ u. / Interruptible Average u / Supply o::l Level ::J __ r-