© 2004 by CRC Press LLC chapter ten Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies* Charles T. Driscoll Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University Gregory B. Lawrence Water Resources, U.S. Geological Survey Arthur J. Bulger University of Virginia Thomas J. Butler Center for the Environment, Cornell University Christopher S. Cronan Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine Christopher Eagar USDA Forest Service Kathleen F. Lambert Hubbard Brook Research Foundation Gene E. Likens Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook John L. Stoddard United States Environmental Protection Agency Kathleen C. Weathers Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook * Modified from Driscoll et al., 2001. Acidic Deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience 51(3): 180–198. Copyright, American Institute of Bio- logical Sciences, with permission. © 2004 by CRC Press LLC Contents Introduction Question 1: What are the spatial patterns and temporal trends for emissions, precipitation concentrations, and deposition of anthropogenic S, N, and acidity across the northeastern United States? Emissions Patterns of precipitation and deposition of S and N Question 2: What are the effects of acidic deposition on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the Northeastern United States, and how have these ecosystems responded to changes in emissions and deposition? Terrestrial–aquatic linkages Effects of acid deposition on soils Depletion of base cations and mobilization of aluminum in soils Accumulation of sulfur in soils Accumulation of nitrogen in soils Effects of acidic deposition on trees Red spruce Sugar maple Effects on surface waters Surface water chemistry Seasonal and episodic acidification of surface waters Long-term changes in surface water chemistry Effects on aquatic biota Question 3: How do we expect emissions and deposition to change in the future, and how might ecosystems respond to these changes? Ecosystem recovery Proposed emission reductions Modeling of emissions scenarios Summary Acknowledgments References Introduction Acidic deposition is the transfer of strong acids and acid-forming substances from the atmosphere to the surface of the earth. The composition of acidic deposition includes ions, gases, and particles derived from gaseous emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), ammonia (NH 3 ), and particulate emissions of acidifying and neutralizing compounds. Over the past quarter century of study, acidic deposition has emerged as a critical environmental stress affecting forested landscapes and aquatic ecosystems in North America, Europe, and Asia. This complex problem is an example of a new class of envi- ronmental issues that are multiregional in scale and not amenable to simple resolution by policy makers. Acidic deposition can originate from transboundary air pollution and affects large geographic areas; is highly variable across space and time; links air pollution to diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; alters the interactions of many elements [e.g., sulfur (S), nitrogen (N), hydrogen ion (H + ), calcium (Ca 2+ ), magnesium (Mg 2+ ), aluminum (Al)]; and contributes directly and indirectly to biological stress and the degradation of ecosystems. Despite the complexity of the effects of acidic deposition, management actions in North America and Europe directed toward the recovery of damaged natural resources have resulted in recent decreases in both emissions and deposition of acidic S compounds. © 2004 by CRC Press LLC Thus, acidic deposition is an instructive case study for coordination of science and policy efforts aimed at resolving large-scale environmental problems. Acidic deposition was first identified by R.A. Smith in England in the 19th century (Smith, 1872). Acidic deposition emerged as an ecologic issue in the late 1960s and early 1970s with reports of acidic precipitation and surface water acidification in Sweden and surrounding Scandinavia (Oden, 1968). The first report of acidic precipitation in North America was made at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) in the remote White Mountains of New Hampshire, based on collections beginning in the early 1960s (Likens et al., 1972). Controls on SO 2 emissions in the United States were first implemented following the 1970 Amend- ments to the Clean Air Act (CAAA). In 1990, Congress passed Title IV of the Acid Deposition Control Program of the CAAA to further decrease emissions of SO 2 and initiate controls on NO x from electric utilities that contribute to acidic deposition. The Acid Deposition Control Program had two goals: (1) a 50% decrease or 9.1 million metric tons per year (or 10 million short tons per year) reduction of SO 2 utility emissions from 1980 levels that is expected to be fully implemented by 2010, and (2) an NO X emission rate limitation (0.65 lb NO X /m BTU in 1990 to 0.39 lb NO X /m BTU in 1996) that will achieve a 1.8 million metric ton per year (2 million short tons per year as nitrogen dioxide) reduction in NO X utility emissions from what would have occurred without emission rate controls. Both SO 2 and NO X provisions are focused on large utilities. The legislation capped total utility emissions of SO 2 at 8.12 million metric tons per year (8.95 million short tons per year), whereas nonutility emissions of SO 2 were capped at 5.08 million metric tons per year (5.6 million short tons per year). Caps for NO x emissions were not established in the legislation, and as a result, emissions may increase over time as the demand for electricity increases. As we begin the 21st century, there is an opportunity to review the previous 10 to 30 years to assess the effects of the 1970 and 1990 Clean Air legislation on emission reductions, air pollution levels, trends and chemical impacts of acidic deposition, and ecosystem recovery. In this report, we focus on three critical questions to examine the ecologic effects of acidic deposition in the study region of New England and New York (Figure 10.1) and to explore the relationship between emission reductions and ecosystem recovery (see below). This analysis draws on research from the northeastern United States along with additional information from the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States and eastern Canada. We rely heavily on data from the HBEF, a research site that provides the longest continuous records of precipitation and stream chemistry (Likens and Bormann, 1995). Because of its location in a region with bedrock that is resistant to chemical weathering and acidic soils, surface waters at the HBEF are representative of areas of the Northeast that are sensitive to acidic deposition. When stream chemistry from the biogeochemical reference watershed (watershed 6) at the HBEF was compared to results from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) synoptic survey of lakes in the Northeast col- lected through the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP; Larsen et al., 1994; Stevens, 1994), only 4.9% of the lakes had lower concentrations of the sum of base cations (i.e., Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ + Na + + K + ), 67% had lower concentrations of SO 4 2- , and 5.7% had lower pH values. However, in comparision to populations of acid-sensitive EMAP lakes [acid-neutralizing capacity (ANC) < 50 µeq L -1 ] 28, 77, and 32% of the lakes have lower concentrations of the sum of base cations, SO 4 2- , and pH, respectively, than stream water draining watershed 6 at the HBEF. Periodic review of knowledge gained from long-term monitoring, process-level research, and modeling is critical for assessing regulatory programs and solving complex environmental problems. The need to resolve the problem of acidic deposition is made more apparent as the many linkages between acidic deposition and other environmental issues are more clearly documented (Table 10.1). Much of the report that follows focuses on what has been learned since the © 2004 by CRC Press LLC 1990 CAAA concerning the effects of acidic deposition on forest vegetation, soils, and surface waters, and the influence of past and potential future emission reductions on ecosystem recovery in the northeastern United States. Question 1: What are the spatial patterns and temporal trends for emissions, precipitation concentrations, and deposition of anthropogenic S, N, and acidity across the Northeastern United States? Emissions In the United States, there have been marked changes in emissions of SO 2 over the past 100 years. Total emissions of SO 2 increased from 9 million metric tons (9.9 million short tons) in 1900 to a peak of 28.8 million metric tons (31.7 million short tons) in 1973, of which 60% were from electric utilities (EPA, 2000). By 1998, total annual SO 2 emissions for the United States had declined to 17.8 million metric tons (19.6 million short tons). From 1970 to 1998, SO 2 emissions from electric utilities decreased by 24%, largely as a result of the 1970 and 1990 CAAAs. Emissions of NO x have increased from about 2.4 million metric tons (2.6 million short tons) in 1900 to 21.8 million metric tons (24 million short tons) in 1990 and have remained fairly constant up to the present. Emissions of SO 2 in the United States are highest in the Midwest. States clustered around the Ohio River Valley (Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Indiana, Illinois, Ken- tucky, and Tennessee) comprised 7 of the 10 states with the highest SO 2 emissions in the nation during 1998 (Figure 10.1a). These 7 states accounted for 41% of the national SO 2 emissions during this period. Of these states, 5 (Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Tennessee) were also among the 10 states with highest total NO x emissions for 1998 and comprise 20% of national emissions (Figure 10.1b). High emissions in this region are primarily from electric utilities and heavy manufacturing. The 1990 CAAA required additional reductions in the emissions of SO 2 from electric utilities, starting in 1995 with Phase I of the Acid Deposition Control Program. This legislation helped to promote the continuing pattern of declining emissions between the periods of 1992–1994 and 1995–1997 for most states in the eastern United States (Figure 10.1a). For the United States, SO 2 emissions decreased 14% for the same period, whereas emissions decreased by 24% in the seven high-emission states in the Midwest. Decreases in emissions of NO x between these periods, however, were only 2% nationally and 3% for the seven high-emission states in the Midwest (Figure 10.1b). Atmospheric deposition of ammonium (NH 4 + ) is derived from emissions of NH 3 and can contribute to the acidification of soil and water when these inputs are oxidized by soil microbes to nitrate (NO 3 − ). The EPA has a national emissions inventory for NH 3 , but little information is available on past emissions. Local and regional studies, however, have identified agricultural activities as the primary source of US emissions of NH 3 (Jordan and Weller, 1996). Livestock/poultry manure is generally considered the largest contrib- utor; emissions from crop senescence may be as large but are difficult to measure accurately (Lawrence et al., 2000). Application of N fertilizer also contributes NH 3 to the atmosphere, but this source is less than 10% of emissions from manure handling in the Mississippi River Basin (Goolsby et al., 1999). Small sources of NH 3 emissions include automobiles and industrial processes (Fraser and Cass, 1998). Patterns of precipitation and deposition of S and N Acidic deposition can occur as wet deposition (as rain, snow, sleet, or hail); as dry depo- sition (as particles or vapor); and as cloud and fog deposition, more common at high © 2004 by CRC Press LLC Figure 10.1 Study region for the analysis of acidic-deposition effects on forest and aquatic ecosys- tems is indicated by the shaded area; solid circles designate the location of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) and other National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) sites in the study region; solid bars show state emissions of (a) SO 2 and (b) NO x for the eastern United States for 1992–94, and open bars for 1995–97. The emissions source-area for the study region, based on 15-hour back trajectories, is indicated by bold dashed lines. The emissions source area, based on 21- hour back trajectories, is indicated by lighter shading (as calculated from Butler et al., 2001). © 2004 by CRC Press LLC elevations and coastal areas. Wet deposition is monitored at over 200 U.S. sites by the interagency-supported National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Net- work (NADP/NTN), initiated in 1978. There are 20 NADP/NTN sites in the northeast study region. In addition, there are several independent sites where precipitation chem- istry has been studied, in some cases for an even longer period (e.g., HBEF). Spatial patterns of wet deposition in the eastern half of the United States have been described by combining NADP/NTN deposition data with information on topography and precipita- tion (Grimm and Lynch, 1997). Dry deposition is monitored by the EPA Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CAST- Net) at approximately 70 sites and by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis- tration AIRMON-dry Network at 13 sites. Most of the sites in these two networks are located east of the Mississippi River and began operation around 1988. There are seven CASTNet and five AIRMON-dry sites in the study region. An inferential approach is used in both CASTNet and AIRMON-dry to estimate dry deposition. This approach is depen- dent on detailed meteorologic measurements and vegetation characteristics, which can vary markedly over short distances in complex terrains (Clarke et al., 1997). As a result, the spatial patterns of dry deposition in the United States are poorly characterized. Cloud and fog deposition in the northeastern United States have been monitored for limited periods at selected high-elevation (>1100 m) and coastal sites to support specific investigations (e.g., Weathers et al., 1988; Anderson et al., 1999). In recent years, the Moun- tain Acid Deposition Program (MADPro), as part of the EPA CASTNet Program, has involved the monitoring of cloud water chemistry at several sites in the eastern United States, including one site in the northeastern United States. Regional patterns and long- term trends are not well characterized, although cloud and fog deposition often contributes from 25 to over 50% of total deposition of S and N to high-elevation sites in the northeastern United States (Anderson et al., 1999). Prevailing winds from west to east result in deposition of pollutants emitted in the Midwest that extend into New England and Canada. During atmospheric transport, some of the SO 2 and NO x are converted to sulfuric and nitric acids; to ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, which can be transported long distances; and nitric acid vapor, which has a shorter atmospheric residence time (Lovett, 1994). Long-term data collected at the HBEF indicate that annual volume-weighted concen- trations of SO 4 2- in bulk precipitation (precipitation sampled from an open collector) has declined (Figure 10.2) with national decreases in SO 2 emissions that followed the 1970 Table 10.1 Linkages Between Emissions of SO 2 and NO x and Important Environmental Issues Problem Linkage to Acidic Deposition Example/Reference Coastal eutrophication Atmospheric deposition is important in the supply of N to coastal waters Jaworski et al., 1997 Mercury Surface water acidification enhances mercury accumulation in fish Driscoll et al., 1994a Visibility Sulfate aerosols are an important component of atmospheric particulates, decreasing visibility Malm et al., 1994 Climate change Sulfate aerosols increase atmospheric albedo, cooling the Earth and offsetting some of the warming potential of greenhouse gases. Tropospheric O 3 and N 2 O act as greenhouse gases. Moore et al., 1997 Tropospheric ozone Emissions of NO x contribute to the formation of ozone Seinfeld, 1986 © 2004 by CRC Press LLC CAAA (Likens et al., 2001). Using back trajectory analysis of air masses (Draxler and Hess, 1998), Butler et al. (2001) identified the approximate emissions source region for atmo- spheric deposition of S and N compounds to the study region in the northeastern United States (Figure 10.1). Annual mean concentrations of SO 4 2- in bulk precipitation at the HBEF were strongly correlated with annual SO 2 emissions based on both 15-hour (r 2 = 0.74; Figure 10.3) and 21-hour (r 2 = 0.74) back trajectories (Likens et al., 2001). Emissions from Ontario and Quebec appear to have contributed little (<10%) to the SO 4 2- deposition for the study region in the 1990s (Environment Canada, 1998; Butler et al., 2001). In contrast to SO 4 2- , there have been no long-term trends in annual volume-weighted concentrations of NO 3 - in bulk precipitation at the HBEF (Figure 10.2). This lack of a long-term pattern is consistent with the minimal changes in NO X emissions over the last 30 years. The beneficial influence of national clean air legislation is also reflected in the strong relationship between historical reductions in air emissions from the source region and decreased deposition of S throughout the northeastern United States, including the HBEF. As SO 2 emissions declined in the 1980s and 1990s in response to the CAAA, the geographic area exposed to elevated wet deposition of S in excess of 25 kg SO 4 2- ha -1 yr -1 decreased Figure 10.2 Long-term trends in volume-weighted annual mean concentrations of SO 4 2- , NO 3 - , NH 4 + , (a) and pH (b) in bulk precipitation, and SO 4 2- , NO 3 - (c), the sum of base cations (C B ; d), and pH (e) in stream water in watershed 6 of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest for 1963 to 1994. © 2004 by CRC Press LLC (Figure 10.4). In 1995–1997, following implementation of Phase I of the Acid Deposition Control Program, emissions of SO 2 in the source area and concentrations of SO 4 2- in both bulk deposition at the HBEF (watershed 6) and wet-only deposition at NADP sites in the Northeast were about 20% lower than in the preceding 3 years, although not significantly different from the long-term trend (Likens et al., 2001). Nitrate and NH 4 + concentrations decreased less than 10% during the same period. Year-to-year variations in precipitation across the region influenced the magnitude and spatial distribution of changes in S and N wet deposition between the periods of 1992–1994 and 1995–1997, which complicated the relationships between emissions and deposition (Lynch et al., 2000; Likens et al., 2001). The Midwest is also a significant source of atmospheric NH 3 . About half of the NH 3 emitted to the atmosphere is typically deposited within 50 km of its source (Ferm, 1998). Figure 10.3 Volume-weighted annual concentrations of SO 4 2- in bulk precipitation at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest as a function of annual emissions of SO 2 for the source-area based on 15-hour back trajectories (see Figure 10.1; modified after Likens et al., 2001). Figure 10.4 Annual wet deposition of SO 4 2- (in kg SO 4 2- ha -1 yr -1 ) in the eastern United States for 1983–85, 1992–94, and 1995–97. Data were obtained for the NADP/NTN and the model of Grimm and Lynch (1997). See color figures following page 200. © 2004 by CRC Press LLC However, high concentrations of SO 2 and NO x can greatly lengthen atmospheric transport of NH 3 through the formation of ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate aerosols; these submicron particles are transported distances similar to SO 2 (>500 km). Ammonium is an important component of atmospheric N deposition. For example, an average of 31% of dissolved inorganic N in annual bulk deposition at the HBEF occurs as NH 4 + . Dry deposition contributes a considerable amount of S and N to the Northeast, although accurate measurements are difficult to obtain (see above). At 10 sites located throughout the United States, Lovett (1994) estimated that dry deposition of S was 9 to 59% of total deposition (wet + dry + cloud), dry deposition of NO 3 - was 25 to 70% of total NO 3 - deposition, and dry deposition of NH 4 + was 2 to 33% of total NH 4 + deposition. This variability is, in part, a result of proximity of sites to high-emission areas and of the relative contribution of cloud and fog deposition. Question 2: What are the effects of acidic deposition on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in the northeastern United States, and how have these ecosystems responded to changes in emissions and deposition? Terrestrial–aquatic linkages Many of the impacts of acidic deposition depend on the rate at which acidifying com- pounds are deposited from the atmosphere compared to the rate at which acid-neutralizing capacity (ANC) is generated within the ecosystem. Acid-neutralizing capacity is a measure of the ability of water or soil to neutralize inputs of strong acid and is largely the result of terrestrial processes such as mineral weathering, cation exchange, and immobilization of SO 4 2- and N (Charles, 1991). Acid-neutralizing processes occur in the solution phase, and their rates are closely linked with the movement of water through terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The effects of acidic deposition on ecosystem processes must therefore be considered within the context of the hydrologic cycle, which is a primary mechanism through which materials are transported from the atmosphere to terrestrial ecosystems and eventually into surface waters. The effects of acidic deposition on surface waters vary seasonally and with stream flow. Surface waters are often most acidic in spring following snowmelt and rain events. In some waters the ANC decreases below 0 µeq L -1 only for short periods (i.e., hours to weeks), when discharge is highest. This process is called episodic acidification. Other lakes and streams, referred to as chronically acidic, maintain ANC values less than 0 µeq L -1 throughout the year. Precipitation (and/or snowmelt) can raise the water table from the subsoil into the upper soil horizons, where acid-neutralizing processes (e.g., mineral weathering, cation exchange) are generally less effective than in the subsoil. Water draining into surface waters during high-flow episodes is therefore more likely to be acidic (i.e., ANC < 0 µeq L -1 ) than water that has discharged from the subsoil, which predominates during drier periods. Both chronic and episodic acidification can occur either through strong inorganic acids derived from atmospheric deposition and/or by natural processes. Natural acidification processes include the production and transport of organic acids derived from decompos- ing plant material, or inorganic acids originating from the oxidation of naturally occurring S or N pools (i.e., pyrite, N 2 -fixation followed by nitrification) from the soil to surface waters. Here we focus on atmospheric deposition of strong inorganic acids, which dom- inate the recent acidification of soil and surface waters in the northeastern United States. © 2004 by CRC Press LLC Effects of acid deposition on soils The observation of elevated concentrations of inorganic monomeric Al in surface waters provided strong evidence of soil interactions with acidic deposition (Driscoll et al., 1980; Cronan and Schofield, 1990). Recent studies have shown that acidic deposition has changed the chemical composition of soils by depleting the content of available plant nutrient cations (i.e., Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , K + ), increasing the mobility of Al and increasing the S and N content. Depletion of base cations and mobilization of aluminum in soils Acidic deposition has increased the concentrations of protons (H + ) and strong acid anions (SO 4 2- and NO 3 - ) in soils of the northeastern United States, which has led to increased rates of leaching of base cations and the associated acidification of soils. If the supply of base cations is sufficient, the acidity of the soil water will be effectively neutralized. However, if base saturation (exchangeable base cation concentration expressed as a percentage of total cation exchange capacity) is below 20%, atmospheric deposition of strong acids results in the mobilization and leaching of Al, and the neutralization of H + will be incomplete (Cronan and Schofield, 1990). Mineral weathering is the primary source of base cations in most watersheds, although atmospheric deposition may provide important inputs to sites with very low rates of supply from mineral sources. In acid-sensitive areas, rates of base cation supply through chemical weathering are not adequate to keep pace with leaching rates accelerated by acidic deposition. Recent studies based on analysis of soil (Lawrence et al., 1999), long- term trends in stream water chemistry (Likens et al., 1996, 1998; Lawrence et al., 1999), and the use of strontium stable isotope ratios (Bailey et al., 1996) indicate that acidic deposition has enhanced the depletion of exchangeable nutrient cations in acid-sensitive areas of the Northeast. At the HBEF, Likens et al. (1996) reported a long-term net decline in soil pools of available Ca 2+ during the last half of the 20th century as acidic deposition reached its highest levels. Loss of ecosystem Ca 2+ peaked in the mid-1970s and abated over the next 15 to 20 years, as atmospheric deposition of SO 4 2- declined. Without strong acid anions, cation leaching in forest soils of the Northeast is largely driven by naturally occurring organic acids derived from decomposition of organic matter, primarily in the forest floor. Once base saturation is reduced in the upper mineral soil, organic acids tend to mobilize Al through formation of organic Al complexes, most of which are deposited lower in the soil profile through adsorption to mineral surfaces. This process, termed podzolization, results in surface waters with low concentrations of Al that are primarily in a nontoxic, organic form (Driscoll et al., 1988). Acidic deposition has altered podzolization, however, by solubilizing Al with inputs of mobile inorganic anions, which facilitates transport of inorganic Al into surface waters. Input of acidic deposition to forest soils with base saturation values less than 20% increases Al mobilization and shifts chemical speciation of Al from organic to inorganic forms that are toxic to terrestrial and aquatic biota (Cronan and Schofield, 1990). Accumulation of sulfur in soils Watershed input–output budgets developed in the 1980s for northeastern forest ecosys- tems indicated that the quantity of S exported by surface waters (primarily as SO 4 2- ) was essentially equivalent to inputs from atmospheric deposition (Rochelle and Church, 1987). These findings suggested that decreases in atmospheric S deposition, from controls on emissions, should result in equivalent decreases in the amount of SO 4 2- entering surface [...]... the acid-sensitive lakes (ANC . and blacknose dace were monitored in streams in the Adirondacks, Catskills, and Appalachian Plateau of Pennsylvania (Wigington et al., 1996). All streams had low ANC values and physical habitats. concentrations increased and ANC values decreased during winter, with maximum NO 3 - concentrations and minimum ANC values occurring during spring snowmelt. Seasonal increases in NO 3 - were also associated. vegetation uptake of N, while ANC values were at the annual maximum. Stream NO 3 - increased and ANC decreased during fall, coinciding with increased flow and decreased plant activity. Nitrate