RESEARCH Open Access Free Rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate magnetic carriers as potential strategies for breast cancer therapy Marcella LB Carneiro 1*† , Eloiza S Nunes 2 , Raphael CA Peixoto 1 , Ricardo GS Oliveira 1 , Luiza HM Lourenço 1 , Izabel CR da Silva 1 , Andreza R Simioni 3 , Antônio C Tedesco 3 , Aparecido R de Souza 2 , Zulmira GM Lacava 1 and Sônia N Báo 1 Abstract Background: Rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) has significant antitumor, cytotoxic, and cytostatic activity on Ehrlich ascite tumor. Although toxic to normal cells, its lower toxicity when compared to carboxylate analogues of rhodium (II) indicates Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 as a promising agent for chemotherapy. Nevertheless, few studies have been performed to explore this pote ntial. Superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (SPIOs) represent an attractive platform as carriers in drug delivery systems (DDS) because they can present greater specificity to tumor cells than normal cells. Thus, the ass ociation between Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and SPIOs can represent a strategy to enhance the former’s therapeutic action. In this work, we report the cytotoxicity of free rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) and rhodium (II) citrate-loaded maghemite nanoparticles or magnetoliposomes, used as drug delivery systems, on both normal and carcinoma breast cell cultures. Results: Treatment with free Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 induced cytotoxicity that was dependent on dose, time, and cell line. The IC 50 values showed that this effect was more intense on breast normal cells (MCF-10A) than on breast carcinoma cells (M CF-7 and 4T 1). However, the treatment with 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 -loaded maghemite nanoparticles (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )andRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 -loaded magnetoliposomes (Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )induceda higher cytotoxicity on MCF-7 and 4T1 than on MCF-10A (p < 0.05). These treatments enhanced cytotoxicity up to 4.6 times. These cytotoxic effects, induced by free Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , were evidenced by morpho logical alterations such as nuclear fragmentation, membrane blebbing and phosphatidylserine exposure, reduction of actin filaments, mitochondrial condensation and an increase in number of vacuoles, suggesting that Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 induces cell death by apoptosis. Conclusions: The treatment with rhodium (II) citrate-loaded maghemite nanoparticles and magnetoliposomes induced more specific cytotoxicity on breast carcinoma cells than on breast normal cells, which is the opposite of the results observed with free Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment. Thus, magnetic nanoparticles represent an attractive platform as carriers in Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 delivery systems, since they can act preferentially in tumor cells. Therefore, these nanopaticulate systems may be explored as a potential tool for chemotherapy drug development. * Correspondence: marbretas@gmail.com † Contributed equally 1 Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brazil. 70.919- 970 Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 © 2011 Carneiro et al; licensee BioMed Cen tral Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the term s of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativeco mmons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, dist ribution, and reproduction in any medium, pro vided the original work is properly cite d. Background Breast carcinoma represents the major cause of death among women worldwide. More than 410,000 deaths are estimated to occur every year, due to its high meta- static capability [1]. This fa ct demands a continuous development of drugs that may effectively treat breast cancer patients. In point of fact, there is a wide field of research concerning antitumor activity of metal com- plexes such as platinum [2], ruthenium [3], and rhodium [4]. Among these, rhodium carboxylates are known for their capacity to unpair DNA bases and therefore inhibit DNA synthesis. Their anti tumor effect has already been studied on Ehrlich ascites tumor, P388 lymphocytic leukemia, oral carcinoma, L1210 and B16 melanoma, MCa mammary carcinoma and Lewis lung carcinoma [4-6]. The structure of rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ), a rhodium carboxylate, is consistent with the familiar dimeric “ lantern” structure with bridging carboxylates and a metal-metal bond (Scheme 1). Interestingly, Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 has significant antitumor, cytotoxic, and cyto- static activity on Ehrlich ascites tumor [7]. Although toxic to normal cells, its lower toxicity w hen compared to carboxylate analogues of rhodium (II) indicates Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 as a promising agent for chemotherapy [4]. Nevertheless, few studies have been performed to explore this potential. Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 presents unco ordinated functional groups (-COOH and -OH) in its structure. These groups may establish physical or chemi cal interactions when used in reaction steps with specific molecules or surfaces. Further, these functional groups are chemically similar to bioactive molecules that have been used to functiona- lize nanostructure materials, such as magnetic nanopar- ticles, leading to stable co lloidal suspensi ons with excellent biocompatibility and stability [8]. Superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide with appro- priate surface functionalization/encapsulation, presented as magnetic fluids or magnetoliposomes, represent an attractive platform as carriers in drug delivery systems (DDS) because they can act specifically in tumor cells [9]. The success of magnetic nanoparticles is mainly due to their high surface area, capacity to pass through the tumor cell membrane and retention to the tumor tissue [10]. In this context, the association between Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and magnetic nanoparticles, in magnetic fluids or in magnetoliposomes, may work as target-specific drug delivery systems, representing a strategy for enhance- ment of the therapeutic action of Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 without affecting normal cells. Some anticancer drugs associated with magnetic nano- particles such as doxorubicin [11], methotrexate [12], tamoxifen [13], paclitaxel [14], a nd cisplatin [15] have high potential for ch emother apy. Among the ma gneti c particles, maghemite (g-Fe 2 O 3 ) is suitable for clinical applications due to its magnetic properties and low toxi- city [16 ]. In this work, we investigated the cytotoxicity induced by (1) free Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ,(2)Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 -loaded maghemite nanoparticles (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )and(3) Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 -loaded magnetoliposomes (Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) on both normal and carcinoma breast cell cultures. The association of Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 to magnetic nanoparti- cles induced s pecific cytotoxic effect in carcinoma cells. Therefore, we suggest that Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and Lip- Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 maybeexploredaspotentialdrugs for chemotherapy. Results • Characterization of rhodium (II) citrate Elemental analyses of rhodium (II) citrate sample are consistent with the molecular formula [Rh 2 (C 6 H 7 O 7 ) 4 (H 2 O) 2 ] and suggest, in solid state, the presence of two water molecules in axial position. Thermal studies of the complex showed that the temperature ranged from 25 to140°C, with an estimated mass loss 4.1% (calculated mass loss = 3.6%), which can be accounted for by the loss of the two water molecules. The ESI-MS spectrum of [Rh 2 (C 6 H 7 O 7 ) 4 +H] + (Figure 1A) shows prominent peaks at m/z = 970.8, corresponding to [Rh 2 (C 6 H 7 O 7 ) 4 + 1H] + . The complex was observed in a 13 CNMRspectrum (Figure 1B) where the s ignals of a-andb-carboxyl car- bon atoms in the complex (195.3 and 192.8 ppm, respectively) appear shiftedincomparisonwiththose with free ligands (179 and 176.5 ppm, respectively). The shift and split of observed C-O stretching frequencies Scheme 1 Schematic representation of rhodium (II) citrate showing the possible coordination of the rhodium dimer to the citric acid by the a- and b-carboxyl groups. R groups represent the side chains of citrate ligand Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 2 of 17 (from 1740 to 1592 and 1412 cm -1 ) of citric acid in infrared spectra has been used to show the coordinat ion of citric acid to rhodium. The value of Δ(ν as CO 2 - ν s CO 2 )=184cm -1 observed in the spectrum of rhodium (II) citrate suggests the occurrence of a bridged or che- lated bidentate coordination. The titration of free carboxylic acid groups in the complex provided a ratio of 7.4 ± 0.4 mol H + by com- plex mol, indicating a 8:1 stoichiometry predicted by the proposed formula Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . • Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles and Magnetoliposomes SPIOs were obtained in the maghemit e (g-Fe 2 O 3 )phase and presented the characteristic diffraction patterns of inverse spinel structure when compared to reference patterns in the literature [17] for maghemite from the International Center of Diffraction Data [18] (Figure 2A). The molar ratio of Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ obtained by elemental analysis was less than 0.015, revealing an efficient oxida- tion from magnetite to maghemite phase. The magnetization curves for bare maghemite (Magh) and surface modified maghemite (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )are shown in Figure 2B. For both samples, the curves indicate superparamagnetic behavior, since no hysteresis was observed [19,20]. The saturation of magnetization was 48 emug -1 to Magh and 45 emug -1 to Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . The surface modification of maghemite nanoparticles was evidenced by infrared spectroscopy and zeta poten- tial measurements. The infrared spectra of functionalized nanoparticles (Figure 2C) show intense absorptions in 1630 and 1564 cm -1 assigned to asymmetrical ν as (COO) and symmetrical ν s (COO) stretching modes of carboxy- late groups [21]. These bands indicate the chemical adsorption of Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 molecules onto the oxide sur- face [22]. In 1724 cm -1 , the stretching vibration of car- boxylic acid ν(C = O) is observed. The presence of free acid groups is consistent with obtainment of stable magnetic fluids in physiological pH. The surface Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 presented a nega- tive zeta potential in a broad range of pH values, and its magnitude in pH 7 was about -35 mV (Figure 2D). Figure 1 A) Positive ion ESI-MS spectra of rhodium (II ) citrate: [Rh 2 (C 6 H 7 O 7 ) 4 +H] + (m/z 970,8). Ordinate: relative intensity. B) 13 C NMR spectra of Rh 2 (H 2 Cit) 4 complex. The upper detail shows that the signals of a- and b-carboxyl carbon atoms in the complex (195.3 and 192.8 ppm, respectively) appear shifted. Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 3 of 17 The complex and iron oxide content in the sample Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 were 1.4 mmolL -1 and 0.33 molL -1 , respectively. The magnetoliposome size presented an average mea- surement of 101.8 ± 0.1 nm, with polydispersion index lower than 0.22, which corresponded to 9 8% of the Gaussian distribution (Figure 3). TEM micrographs revealed that the maghemite nanoparticles u sed (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) have a spherical shape (Figure 4A) and a modal diameter of 7.85 nm (SD = 2.10) (Figure 4B). I n contrast, samples of Lip- Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 have a rounded shape (Figure 4C) and a modal diameter of 28.19 nm (SD = 6.17) (Figure 4D). Different sized nanoparticles were also observed in the samples, demonstrating their polydispersed distribution. • Cytotoxicity of free rhodium (II) citrate The distribution of cell viability according to the treat- ment, time, and the e valua ted cell lin e after in cubation with free rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )isshownin Table 1. A significant difference in the viability of the cells with and without Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment was observed, independently of the cell line and the duration of treatment (p < 0.05). We did not observe cytotoxici ty at doses lower than 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (data not shown). All cell lines presented similar cytotoxic effect of 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 after 24, 48, and 72 h treatments. However, at doses higher th an 200 μ M, hi gher cytotox i- city was observed on breast normal cell line (MCF-10A) than on breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7 and 4T1). In general, the cytotoxic effect of Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 was high er after 72 h and after treatments with 500 and 600 μM doses (p < 0.05). Thus, Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 induced a dose and time-dependent viability reduction on the investigated cell lines. Figure 2 A) Diffraction pattern for sample Magh. B) Magnetization curves at 300 K for bare: ○ maghemite (Magh), and ● modified maghemite (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ). C) Infrared Spectra for ___ Magh and - - - Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ; D) Zeta potential versus pH curves for □○□Magh, and □ ● □ Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . Figure 3 Size analysis of the magnetoliposomes (1.96 × 10 15 iron particles/mL) by laser light scattering. Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 4 of 17 Paclitaxel (50 μM), used as positive contro l, induced a more intense cytoto xic effect after 72 h in the three cell lines than Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . Treatments with DMSO caused no significant cytotoxicity to the three cell lines studied after 24 and 48 h treatments. Nevertheless, after 72 h, DMSO demonstrated a higher cytotoxicity to 4T1 and MCF-10A cells lines t han to MCF-7 line. Since the cells studied showed sensitivity to paclitaxel our experimental models were validated (Table 1). The IC 50 values of the treatments with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 in MCF-7, 4T1, and MCF-10A cells are shown in Table 2. The results confirmed that the cytotoxicity of the Figure 4 Morphological characterization and m easurement of nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy.A)Electron micrograph of maghemite nanoparticles associated with rhodium (II) citrate (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , final concentration: 3.12 × 10 13 iron particles/mL). B) Histogram of the distribution of the measured diameters of Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , with a modal diameter mean of 7.85 nm and s mean = 2.10. C) Electron micrograph of magnetoliposomes associated with rhodium (II) citrate (Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , final concentration: 1.25 × 10 13 iron particles/mL). D) Histogram of the distribution of diameters of Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 showing a mean modal diameter of 28.19 nm and mean s = 6.17. Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 5 of 17 treatment with the complex is dependent on dose, time, and cell line. The IC 50 values for human carcinoma (MCF-7) and mouse carcinoma (4T1) cell lines were relatively similar. Likewise, normal cell lines (MCF-10A) were more sensitive to treatment with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (Table 2). • Analysis of morphological and structural alterations on MCF-7 and 4T1 cell lines MCF-7 cells have predominantly fusiform morphology (Figure 5A), while 4T1 cells presented both spindle and rounded cells forming clusters, characteristic of this these types of tumor c ells (Figure 6A). Nevertheless, both MCF-7 and 4T1 cells became more rounded and with blebbing after treatment with 500 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 for 48 h. After this treatment smaller confluence and reduced cell size were also observed when 4T1 and MCF-7 control cells were compared. Furthermore, this effect was more pronounced in the 4T1 cell line (Figure 5A, B and 6A, B). No morphological alterations were observed in MCF-7 and 4T1 untreated cells (control), according to the images taken by the phase contrast microscope (Figure 5A and 6A). Ultrastructural details of MCF-7 and 4T1 cell mor- phology, after treatment with 500 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ,are shown in Figure 5D, F and 6D, F, respectively. After this treatment, several morphological alterations were observed, such as the presence of blebbing, the Table 1 Distribution of cell viability percentage according to the treatment, cell line and exposure time Treatment Cell line 24 h 48 h 72 h 0 (control) MCF-7 100.00 ± 1.50 A*; a # 99.94 ± 1.95 A; a 100.00 ± 1.06 A; a 4T1 100.00 ± 1.21 A; a 100.00 ± 1.46 A; a 100.00 ± 1.34 A; a MCF-10A 100.00 ± 3.30 A; a 100.00 ± 1.05 A; a 100.00 ± 0.92 A; a Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 50 μM MCF-7 94.96 ± 2.44 A; a 97.48 ± 2.84 A; a 81.19 ± 2.30 B; a 4T1 90.31 ± 1.38 A; a 87.79 ± 2.63 A.B; a 81.42 ± 2.56 B; a MCF-10A 97.75 ± 3.77 A; a 97.82 ± 1.40 A; a 84.30 ± 2.55 B; a Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 200 μM MCF-7 89.28 ± 2.60 A; a 81.64 ± 2.38 A; a 70.13 ± 2.58 B; a 4T1 79.13 ± 1.44 A; b 73.42 ± 2.17 A.B; a 68.12 ± 3.64 B; a MCF-10A 61.82 ± 6.54 A; b 44.19 ± 1.60 B; b 30.43 ± 2.69 C; b Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 300 μM MCF-7 85.33 ± 2.14 A; a 73.77 ± 2.58 B; a 54.14 ± 2.47 C; a 4T1 73.95 ± 2.54 A; a 61.77 ± 1.47 B; b 47.79 ± 4.11 C; a MCF-10A 39.41 ± 7.47 A; b 23.81 ± 0.74 B; c 12.78 ± 0.92 C; b Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 500 μM MCF-7 50.08 ± 2.49 A; a 25.29 ± 3.46 B.C; a 30.39 ± 3.47 C; a 4T1 46.14 ± 3.49 A; a 30.66 ± 1.22 B; a 26.07 ± 2.75 B; a MCF-10A 25.85 ± 6.46 A; b 11.62 ± 1.17 A.B; b 5.46 ± 0.46 C; b Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 600 μM MCF-7 28.71 ± 3.90 A; a 16.86 ± 1.77 B; a 12.16 ± 1.93 B; a 4T1 29.87 ± 3.67 A; a 15.86 ± 0.57 B; a 9.97 ± 1.49 B; a MCF-10A 13.34 ± 2.43 A; b 10.26 ± 1.27 A; b 4.76 ± 0.39 B; b DMSO (0.85%) MCF-7 90.51 ± 5.9 A; a 90.93 ± 1.7 A; a 96.4 ± 1.4 A; a 4T1 106.2 ± 1.3 A; b 100.6 ± 2.97 A; a 43.07 ± 8.2 B; b MCF-10A 148.1 ± 6.8 A; c 82.45 ± 2.3 B; a 63.35 ± 2.2 C; c Paclitaxel 50 μM MCF-7 70.07 ± 0.4 A; a 55.93 ± 1.6 B; a 18.92 ± 4.3 C; a 4T1 68.31 ± 1.2 A; a 30.12 ± 0.7 B; b 21.51 ± 1.4 C; a MCF-10A 80.17 ± 6.7 A; c 33.52 ± 1.09 B; b 20.95 ± 1.1 C; a The data represent the mean ± SE (mean standard error) of three independent experiments in triplicates. * Different capital letters denote statistical difference between viability in the different times (rows) for a given cell line (breast cancer cells MCF-7. 4T1 or normal cells MCF-10A) under the same treatment (p <0.05). # Different tiny letters indicate mean statistical difference between the viability of different cell lines (columns) for a given time (24. 48 or 72 hours) (p <0.05). Table 2 Distribution of the IC 50 values and their respective confidence intervals (95%) in MCF-7, 4T1, and MCF-10A cell lines after treatment with free rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) IC 50 (IC 95%) Cell lines 24 hours 48 hours 72 hours MCF-7 483 μM (459,2 a 507 μM) 376 μM (356,2 a 396,1 μM) 294 μM (259,9 a 332,5 μM) 4T1 440 μM (407,3 a 475 μM) 337 μM (317,3 a 357,8 μM) 271 μM (241,4 a 303,9 μM) MCF-10A 250 μM (211,1 a 295,2 μM) 181 μM (172,3 a 190,8 μM) 123 μM (114,7 a 132,7 μM) These data refers from viability of cells after treatment with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (50-600 μM) for 24, 48 and 72 hours. Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 6 of 17 segregation of condensed chromatin to nuclear periph- eryandtheremarkablepresenceofvacuolesandcon- densed mitochondria when compa red to the MCF-7 and 4T1 control cells (Figure 5C-F and 6C-F), respectively. These morphological changes can be related to the apoptotic events. • Phosphatidylserine exposition on breast carcinoma cells In Figure 7 the percentage of cells that were positively stained for annexin V-FITC is represented. After 500 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment, the annexin-V + cell number (%) was significantly higher than that of the control in both cell lines (p < 0.05). After this treatment, Figure 5 Morphological and structural changes induced by rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) in MCF-7 breast carcinoma c ell line after 48 hours of treatment. Cells were incubated with 500 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 for 48 hours and examined by phase contrast microscopy (A, B) and transmission electron microscopy (C-F). (A, C and E) control (cells without treatment); (B, D and F) cells treated with 500 μMofRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . Differences were observed in cell morphology, vacuole amount and mitochondrial condensation between untreated cells (A, C and E) and Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treated cells (B, D and F). Legends: blebbing (arrows), vacuoles (arrow heads), nucleus (n), mitochondria (m), condensed chromatin (*). Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 7 of 17 therewasa25%anda38%increaseofannexin-V + cell number in MCF-7 and 4T1, respectively (p < 0.05), thus revealing that the 4T1 cell line was more sensitive to treatment with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (500 μM). No difference in the percentage of annexin-V + cell number was observed in relation to untreated cells (control) and 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treated cells, in both cell lines (p < 0.05). • Analysis of nuclear fragmentation and actin alterations MCF-7 cells without treatment (control) showed orga- nized spread actin in the cytoplasm and interactions between surrounding cells through membrane projec- tions supported by actin (Figure 8A). After treatment with 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , slight nuclear condensation and reduction of actin filaments were observed Figure 6 Morphological and structural changes induced by rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) in 4T 1 breast c arc inoma cell l ine after 48 hours of treatment. Cells were incubated with 500 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 for 48 hours and examined by phase contrast microscopy (A, B) and transmission electron microscopy (C-F). (A, C and E) control (cells without treatment); (B, D and F) cells treated with 500 μMofRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 . Differences were observed in cell morphology, vacuole amount and mitochondrial condensation between untreated cells (A, C and E) and Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treated cells (B, D and F). Legends: blebbing (arrows), vacuoles (arrow heads), nucleus (n), mitochondria (m), condensed chromatin (*). Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 8 of 17 (Figure 8C). N evertheless, a noticeabl e reduction in actin and increased nuclear condensation were observed after tr eatment with 500 μM(Figure8E).In general, the cells treated with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 showed a loss of cytoplasmic projections when compared to the control cells (Figure 8A, C and 8E). Furthermore, the cells treated with paclitaxel (50 μM) showed nuclear condensation and fragmentation and a low er amount of actin cytoskeleton, similar to those treated with Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (Figure 8G). Phase contrast images were shown to validate DAPI and phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 488 staining for each experimental group (Figure 8B, D, F and 8H). • Cytotoxicity of rhodium (II) citrate-loaded magnetic nanoparticles MCF-7, 4T 1, and MCF-10A cell viabilities were similar after treatment with 50 μM of free Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , indepen- dent of the treatment duration (Figure 9). Nevertheless, treatment with 50 μMRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 -loaded maghemite nanoparticles (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 )andRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 - loaded magnetoliposomes (Lip-Magh- Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) induced a significant decrease, mainly in MCF-7 and 4T1 breast carcinoma cell viability (p < 0.05). This effect was more evident in 4T1 cells, which showed a fall in viability of 46% (± 2.7), 69% (± 2), and 74% (± 1.4) after Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Within the same time frame, the Lip- Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment decreased 4T1 cell viability by 57% (± 1.3), 68% (± 2.4), and 84% (± 2.9) after 24, 48 and 72 h treatments, respectively (Figure 9). In contrast, thesamedoseoffreeRh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 reduced cell viability by about 10% (± 1.4), 12% (± 2.6), and 18% (± 2.6), after Figure 7 Phosphatidylserine exposure induced by rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) in breast carcinoma cells (lines 4T1 and MCF-7) after 48 hours of treatment. Cells were stained with annexin V-FITC (fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate) and PI (propidium iodide) and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of annexin positive cells represents the cells with exposed phosphatidylserine. Data were normalized with the control (cells without treatment) and expressed as percentage of the mean ± SE of three experiments that were independently performed in triplicate. One or two asterisks (* and **) indicate statistical differences between control and cells treated in MCF-7 and 4T1 cell lines, respectively (p < 0.001). Figure 8 Nuclear fragmentation and reduction of actin filaments in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells 48 hours after treatment. Cells were stained with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-fenilindol) to visualize the nucleus (in blue) and with Phalloidine-Alexa Fluor 488 to visualize actin (in green). (A, B) control (cells without treatment); (C, D) cells treated with 50 μM and (E, F) with 500 μMof Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ; (G, H) cells treated with 10 nM paclitaxel for 2 h. Arrows and arrow heads indicate nuclear fragmentation and chromatin condensation, respectively. Phase-contrast images are presented for validation of fluorescence (Figure 8B, D, F, H). Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 9 of 17 24, 48 and 72 h treatments, respectively (p < 0.05). However, 72 h of Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatments on 4T1 cells induced a decrease in cell viability of respectively 74% (± 1.4) and 84% (± 2.9) against 18% (± 2.6) presented by the free drug at the same concentration. Thus, Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and Lip- Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatments showed enhanced Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 potency of up to 3.9 and 4.6 times, respectively. Longer treatments enhanced the cytotoxicity of both Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (Figure 9). After 24 h of treatment wit h Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 and Lip- Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 , a differential cytotoxicity was observed among the three cell lines. This e ffect was more pro- nounced in 4T1 and MCF-7 cells. Further, we observed that Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment was more cytotoxic than Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 to MCF-7 cell line (p < 0.05). A higher cytotoxicity was noticed in MCF-10A 72 h after the Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment, but this did not happen with the Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 treatment. It is noteworthy that in all time windows and all tested cell lines there was no difference in the viability of the control cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 9). The cells treated with maghemite nanoparticles with- out rhodium (II) citrate (Magh) showed no reduction in viability after any treatment duration; however, viability reduction was observed after 72 h treatment with Lip- Magh (data not shown). Discussion In this work, the rhodium (II) citrate was isolated from the aqueous solution as powder and not as a single crys- tal. Due to this fact the complete structure determination cannot be resolved. However, the elemental analysis, 13 C NMR, IR, UV/Visible data enable us to predict that the compound structure was similar to the previously studied rhodium (II) carboxylates [23]. In the 13 C NMR spectrum (Figure 1B), the signals of a-andb-carboxyl carbon atoms in the complex appear shifted in comparison with Figure 9 Cytotoxic effect of maghemite nanoparticles associated with rhodium (II) citrate (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) and magnetoliposomes (Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) in breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7 and 4T1) and breast normal cell line (MCF-10A). Cells were incubated with free rhodium (II) citrate (Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ), Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (final concentration: 3 × 10 15 iron particles/mL and 23 mM of iron) or Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 (final concentration: 12.5 × 10 15 iron particles/mL and 94.5 mM of iron) for 24, 48 and 72 h. In all treatments the concentration of Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 used was 50 μM. Data were normalized with the control (cells without treatment) and expressed as mean ± standard error of two independent experiments performed in triplicates. Different letters indicate statistical difference within each treatment (p < 0.05). Carneiro et al . Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011, 9:11 http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/11 Page 10 of 17 [...]... mainly because they increase the efficiency of encapsulation and the duration of rhodium (II) citrate release Our study demonstrated that the composition of maghemite nanoparticles coated with citrate or rhodium (II) citrate was appropriate for its application as a drug delivery system Coating with the citrate molecule was able to stabilize our magnetic nanoparticles and also was not toxic to the investigated... Biophysica Acta (BBA) Biomembranes 1980, 597:543-551 doi:10.1186/1477-3155-9-11 Cite this article as: Carneiro et al.: Free Rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate magnetic carriers as potential strategies for breast cancer therapy Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011 9:11 Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: • Convenient online submission • Thorough peer review • No space... under heating and constant oxygen flow The reddish sediment was centrifuged, dispersed in water, and dialyzed for 24 hours In the second stage of the nanocomposite preparation procedure, the magnetic nanoparticles were functionalized with rhodium (II) citrate For this purpose, 5 mL of the magnetic dispersion and 1 mL of rhodium (II) citrate solution (0.054 molL-1) were mixed and stirred for two hours... these nanosystems were associated to target molecules for breast carcinoma cells such as folic acid, for instance, their potential for selective uptake would be even higher [46] Thus, Magh-Rh2(H2cit)4 and LipMagh-Rh2(H2cit)4 have much potential for application in drug delivery systems, and they should be considered as a platform to enhance Rh2(H2cit)4 cytotoxicity, specifically in breast carcinoma Conclusions... principal investigator and takes primary responsibility for the paper MLBC, ZGML, ARS* and SNB participated in the design of the study and SNB co-ordinated the research; MLBC, ESN, RCAP, RGSO and LHML performed the laboratory work for this study; ESN and ARS* synthesized the rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate- loaded nanoparticles; ARS# and Carneiro et al Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2011,... interaction with human cancer cells Biomaterials 2005, 26:2685-2694 41 Sinisterra RD, Shastri VP, Najjar R, Langer R: Encapsulation and release of rhodium( II) citrate and its association complex with hydroxypropyl-betacyclodextrin from biodegradable polymer microspheres J Pharm Sci 1999, 88:574-576 42 Burgos AE, Belchior JC, Sinisterra RD: Controlled release of rhodium (II) carboxylates and their association... preliminary studies For instance, preliminary studies showed that rhodium (II) citrate induces a higher cytotoxicity, with increasing dose and duration of treatment, on breast carcinoma cells (Ehrlich) and on carcinoma (Y-1) and normal adrenocortical cells (AR-1(6)) [7] Similarly, it was also reported that other rhodium carboxylates such as acetate, methoxyacetate, propionate, and butyrate inhibited... cytotoxicity was dose and time dependent High concentrations of Rh2(H2cit)4 (up to 200 μM) were seen to induce greater cytotoxicity after longer treatments (72 hours) Furthermore, it was also demonstrated that its cytotoxic effect differed between breast normal (MCF-10A) and breast carcinoma (4T1 and MCF-7) cell lines, being more pronounced in breast normal cells (Table 1 and 2) Our data are, therefore, in... was more intense on breast normal cells (MCF-10A) than on breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7 and 4T1) However, according to the IC 50 values (Table 2), we demonstrated that rhodium (II) citrate is less toxic to normal cells than are members of the lipophilic complex, such as propionate, butyrate, and acetate of rhodium [30] Therefore, this complex may have a higher chemotherapeutic potential in relation... glutaraldehyde (v/v), 2% (w/v) paraformaldeyde, and 3% (w/v) sucrose in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.2 Afterward, cells were rinsed in the same buffer and post fixed, for 40 minutes, in 1% osmium tetroxide (w/v) and 0.8% potassium ferricyanide (10 mM CaCl2 in 0.2 M sodium cacodylate buffer) The material was washed in distilled water and the block stained was performed for 12 h with 0.5% uranyl acetate . 597:543-551. doi:10.1186/1477-3155-9-11 Cite this article as: Carneiro et al.: Free Rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate magnetic carriers as potential strategies for breast cancer therapy. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. RESEARCH Open Access Free Rhodium (II) citrate and rhodium (II) citrate magnetic carriers as potential strategies for breast cancer therapy Marcella LB Carneiro 1*† , Eloiza. nanoparticles associated with rhodium (II) citrate (Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) and magnetoliposomes (Lip-Magh-Rh 2 (H 2 cit) 4 ) in breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7 and 4T1) and breast normal cell