Programming C# 4.0 phần 8 doc

for as long as it needs to do a particular job—it has to be an illusion because if clients really took it in turns, scalability would be severely limited. So transactions perform the neat trick of letting work proceed in parallel except for when that would cause a problem—as long as all the transactions currently in progress are working on inde- pendent data they can all proceed simultaneously, and clients have to wait their turn only if they’re trying to use data already involved (directly, or indirectly) in some other transaction in progress. ‖ The classic example of the kind of problem transactions are designed to avoid is that of updating the balance of a bank account. Consider what needs to happen to your account when you withdraw money from an ATM—the bank will want to make sure that your account is debited with the amount of money withdrawn. This will involve subtracting that amount from the current balance, so there will be at least two operations: discovering the current balance, and then updating it to the new value. (Actually it’ll be a whole lot more complex than that—there will be withdrawal limit checks, fraud detection, audit trails, and more. But the simplified example is enough to illustrate how transactions can be useful.) But what happens if some other transaction occurs at the same time? Maybe you happen to be making a withdrawal at the same time as the bank processes an electronic transfer of funds. If that happens, a problem can arise. Suppose the ATM transaction and the electronic transfer both read the current balance—perhaps they both discover a balance of $1,234. Next, if the transfer is moving $1,000 from your account to somewhere else, it will write back a new balance of $234—the original balance minus the amount just deducted. But there’s the ATM transfer—suppose you withdraw $200. It will write back a new balance of $1,034. You just withdrew $200 and paid $1,000 to another account, but your account only has $200 less in it than before rather than $1,200—that’s great for you, but your bank will be less happy. (In fact, your bank probably has all sorts of checks and balances to try to minimize opportunities such as this for money to magi- cally come into existence. So they’d probably notice such an error even if they weren’t using transactions.) In fact, neither you nor your bank really wants this to happen, not least because it’s easy enough to imagine similar examples where you lose money. This problem of concurrent changes to shared data crops up in all sorts of forms. You don’t even need to be modifying data to observe a problem: code that only ever reads can still see weird results. For example, you might want to count your money, in which case looking at the balances of all your accounts would be necessary—that’s a read- only operation. But what if some other code was in the middle of transferring money between two of your accounts? Your read-only code could be messed up by other code modifying the data. ‖ In fact, it gets a good deal cleverer than that. Databases go to some lengths to avoid making clients wait for one another unless it’s absolutely necessary, and can sometimes manage this even when clients are accessing the same data, particularly if they’re only reading the common data. Not all databases do this in the same way, so consult your database documentation for further details. Object Context | 577 A simple way to avoid this is to do one thing at a time—as long as each task completes before the next begins, you’ll never see this sort of problem. But that turns out to be impractical if you’re dealing with a large volume of work. And that’s why we have transactions—they are designed to make it look like things are happening one task at a time, but under the covers they allow tasks to proceed concurrently as long as they’re working on unrelated information. So with transactions, the fact that some other bank customer is in the process of performing a funds transfer will not stop you from using an ATM. But if a transfer is taking place on one of your accounts at the same time that you are trying to withdraw money, transactions would ensure that these two operations take it in turns. So code that uses transactions effectively gets exclusive access to whatever data it is working with right now, without slowing down anything it’s not using. This means you get the best of both worlds: you can write code as though it’s the only code running right now, but you get good throughput. How do we exploit transactions in C#? Example 14-20 shows the simplest approach: if you create a TransactionScope object, the EF will automatically enlist any database operations in the same transaction. The TransactionScope class is defined in the System.Transactions namespace in the System.Transactions DLL (another class library DLL for which we need to add a reference, as it’s not in the default set). Example 14-20. TransactionScope using (var dbContext = new AdventureWorksLT2008Entities()) { using (var txScope = new TransactionScope()) { var customersWithOrders = from cust in dbContext.Customers where cust.SalesOrderHeaders.Count > 0 select cust; foreach (var customer in customersWithOrders) { Console.WriteLine("Customer {0} has {1} orders", customer.CustomerID, customer.SalesOrderHeaders.Count); } txScope.Complete(); } } For as long as the TransactionScope is active (i.e., until it is disposed at the end of the using block), all the requests to the database this code makes will be part of the same transaction, and so the results should be consistent—any other database client that tries to modify the state we’re looking at will be made to wait (or we’ll be made to wait for them) in order to guarantee consistency. The call to Complete at the end indicates that we have finished all the work in the transaction, and are happy for it to commit— without this, the transaction would be aborted at the end of the scope’s using block. 578 | Chapter 14: Databases For a transaction that modifies data, failure to call Complete will lose any changes. Since the transaction in Example 14-20 only reads data, this might not cause any visible problems, but it’s difficult to be certain. If a TransactionScope was already active on this thread (e.g., a function farther up the call stack started one) our Transaction Scope could join in with the same transaction, at which point failure to call Complete on our scope would end up aborting the whole thing, possibly losing data. The documentation recommends calling Complete for all transactions except those you want to abort, so it’s a good practice always to call it. Transaction Length When transactions conflict because multiple clients want to use the same data, the database may have no choice but to make one or more of the clients wait. This means you should keep your transaction lifetimes as short as you possibly can—slow transactions can bog down the system. And once that starts happening, it becomes a bit of a pile-up—the more transactions that are stuck waiting for something else to finish, the more likely it is that new transactions will want to use data that’s already under contention. The rosy “best of both worlds” picture painted earlier evaporates. Worse, conflicts are sometimes irreconcilable—a database doesn’t know at the start of a transaction what information will be used, and sometimes it can find itself in a place where it cannot proceed without returning results that will look inconsistent, in which case it’ll just fail with an error. (In other words, the clever tricks databases use to minimize how often transactions block sometimes backfire.) It’s easy enough to contrive pathological code that does this on purpose, but you hope not to see it in a live system. The shorter you make your transactions the less likely you are to see troublesome conflicts. You should never start a transaction and then wait for user input before finishing the transaction—users have a habit of going to lunch mid-transaction. Transaction dura- tion should be measured in milliseconds, not minutes. TransactionScope represents an implicit transaction—any data access performed inside its using block will automatically be enlisted on the transaction. That’s why Exam- ple 14-20 never appears to use the TransactionScope it creates—it’s enough for it to exist. (The transaction system keeps track of which threads have active implicit transactions.) You can also work with transactions explicitly—the object context provides a Connection property, which in turn offers explicit BeginTransaction and EnlistTran saction methods. You can use these in advanced scenarios where you might need to control database-specific aspects of the transaction that an implicit transaction cannot reach. Object Context | 579 These transaction models are not specific to the EF. You can use the same techniques with ADO.NET v1-style data access code. Besides enabling isolation of multiple concurrent operations, transactions provide another very useful property: atomicity. This means that the operations within a single transaction succeed or fail as one: all succeed, or none of them succeed—a transaction is indivisible in that it cannot complete partially. The database stores updates performed within a transaction provisionally until the transaction completes—if it suc- ceeds, the updates are permanently committed, but if it fails, they are rolled back and it’s as though the updates never occurred. The EF uses transactions automatically when you call SaveChanges—if you have not supplied a transaction, it will create one just to write the updates. (If you have supplied one, it’ll just use yours.) This means that SaveChanges will always either succeed completely, or have no effect at all, whether or not you provide a transaction. Transactions are not the only way to solve problems of concurrent access to shared data. They are bad at handling long-running operations. For example, consider a system for booking seats on a plane or in a theater. End users want to see what seats are available, and will then take some time—minutes probably—to decide what to do. It would be a terrible idea to use a transaction to handle this sort of scenario, because you’d effectively have to lock out all other users looking to book into the same flight or show until the current user makes a decision. (It would have this effect because in order to show available seats, the transaction would have had to inspect the state of every seat, and could potentially change the state of any one of those seats. So all those seats are, in effect, owned by that transaction until it’s done.) Let’s just think that through. What if every person who flies on a particular flight takes two minutes to make all the necessary decisions to complete his booking? (Hours of queuing in airports and observing fellow passengers lead us to suspect that this is a hopelessly optimistic estimate. If you know of an airline whose passengers are that competent, please let us know—we’d like to spend less time queuing.) The Airbus A380 aircraft has FAA and EASA approval to carry 853 passengers, which suggests that even with our uncommonly decisive passengers, that’s still a total of more than 28 hours of decision making for each flight. That sounds like it could be a problem for a daily flight. # So there’s no practical way of avoiding having to tell the odd passenger that, sorry, in between showing him the seat map and choosing the seat, someone else got in there first. In other words, we are going to have to accept that sometimes data will #And yes, bookings for daily scheduled flights are filled up gradually over the course of a few months, so 28 hours per day is not necessarily a showstopper. Even so, forcing passengers to wait until nobody else is choosing a seat would be problematic—you’d almost certainly find that your customers didn’t neatly space out their usage of the system, and so you’d get times where people wanting to book would be unable to. Airlines would almost certainly lose business the moment they told customers to come back later. 580 | Chapter 14: Databases change under our feet, and that we just have to deal with it when it happens. This requires a slightly different approach than transactions. Optimistic Concurrency Optimistic concurrency describes an approach to concurrency where instead of enforc- ing isolation, which is how transactions usually work, we just make the cheerful assumption that nothing’s going to go wrong. And then, crucially, we verify that assumption just before making any changes. In practice, it’s common to use a mixture of optimistic concurrency and transactions. You might use optimistic approaches to handle long- running logic, while using short-lived transactions to manage each in- dividual step of the process. For example, an airline booking system that shows a map of available seats in an aircraft on a web page would make the optimistic assumption that the seat the user selects will probably not be selected by any other user in between the moment at which the application showed the available seats and the point at which the user picks a seat. The advantage of making this assumption is that there’s no need for the system to lock anyone else out—any number of users can all be looking at the seat map at once, and they can all take as long as they like. Occasionally, multiple users will pick the same seat at around the same time. Most of the time this won’t happen, but the occasional clash is inevitable. We just have to make sure we notice. So when the user gets back to us and says that he wants seat 7K, the application then has to go back to the database to see if that seat is in fact still free. If it is, the application’s optimism has been vindicated, and the booking can proceed. If not, we just have to apologize to the user (or chastise him for his slowness, depending on the prevailing attitude to customer service in your organization), show him an updated seat map so that he can see which seats have been claimed while he was dithering, and ask him to make a new choice. This will happen only a small fraction of the time, and so it turns out to be a reasonable solution to the problem—certainly better than a system that is incapable of taking enough bookings to fill the plane in the time available. Sometimes optimistic concurrency is implemented in an application-specific way. The example just described relies on an understanding of what the various entities involved mean, and would require us to write code that explicitly performs the check described. But slightly more general solutions are available—they are typically less efficient, but they can require less code. The EF offers some of these ignorant-but-effective approaches to optimistic concurrency. The default EF behavior seems, at a first glance, to be ignorant and broken—not only does it optimistically assume that nothing will go wrong, but it doesn’t even do anything to check that assumption. We might call this blind optimism—we don’t even get to Object Context | 581 discover when our optimism turned out to be unfounded. While that sounds bad, it’s actually the right thing to do if you’re using transactions—transactions enforce isolation and so additional checks would be a waste of time. But if you’re not using transactions, this default behavior is not good enough for code that wants to change or add data—you’ll risk compromising the integrity of your application’s state. To get the EF to check that updates are likely to be sound, you can tell it to check that certain entity properties have not changed since the entity was populated from the database. For example, in the SalesOrderDetail entity, if you select the ModifiedDate property in the EDM designer, you could go to the Properties panel and set its Con- currency Mode to Fixed (its default being None). This will cause the EF to check that this particular column’s value is the same as it was when the entity was fetched when- ever you update it. And as long as all the code that modifies this particular table remembers to update the ModifiedDate, you’ll be able to detect when things have changed. While this example illustrates the concept, it’s not entirely robust. Using a date and time to track when a row changes has a couple of problems. First, different computers in the system are likely to have slight differ- ences between their clocks, which can lead to anomalies. And even if only one computer ever accesses the database, its clock may be adjusted from time to time. You’d end up wanting to customize the SQL code used for updates so that everything uses the database server’s clock for consistency. Such customizations are possible, but they are beyond the scope of this book. And even that might not be enough—if the row is updated often, it’s possible that two updates might have the same time- stamp due to insufficient precision. A stricter approach based on GUIDs or sequential row version numbers is more robust. But this is the realm of database design, rather than Entity Framework usage—ultimately you’re going to be stuck with whatever your DBA gives you. If any of the columns with a Concurrency Mode of Fixed change between reading an entity’s value and attempting to update it, the EF will detect this when you call SaveChanges and will throw an OptimisticConcurrencyException, instead of completing the update. The EF detects changes by making the SQL UPDATE conditional—its WHERE clause will include checks for all of the Fixed columns. It inspects the updated row count that comes back from the database to see whether the update succeeded. How you deal with an optimistic concurrency failure is up to your application—you might simply be able to retry the work, or you may have to get the user involved. It will depend on the nature of the data you’re trying to update. 582 | Chapter 14: Databases The object context provides a Refresh method that you can call to bring entities back into sync with the current state of the rows they represent in the database. You could call this after catching an OptimisticConcurrencyException as the first step in your code that recovers from a problem. (You’re not actually required to wait until you get a concurrency exception—you’re free to call Refresh at any time.) The first argument to Refresh tells it what you’d like to happen if the database and entity are out of sync. Passing RefreshMode.StoreWins tells the EF that you want the entity to reflect what’s currently in the database, even if that means discarding updates previously made in memory to the entity. Or you can pass RefreshMode.ClientWins, in which case any changes in the entity remain present in memory. The changes will not be written back to the database until you next call SaveChanges. So the significance of calling Refresh in ClientWins mode is that you have, in effect, acknowledged changes to the underlying database—if changes in the database were previously causing SaveChanges to throw an OptimisticConcurrencyException, calling SaveChanges again after the Refresh will not throw again (unless the database changes again in between the call to Refresh and the second SaveChanges). Context and Entity Lifetime If you ask the context object for the same entity twice, it will return you the same object both times—it remembers the identity of the entities it has returned. Even if you use different queries, it will not attempt to load fresh data for any entities already loaded unless you explicitly pass them to the Refresh method. Executing the same LINQ query multiple times against the same context will still result in multiple queries being sent to the database. Those queries will typically return all the current data for the relevant entity. But the EF will look at primary keys in the query results, and if they correspond to entities it has already loaded, it just returns those existing entities and won’t notice if their values in the database have changed. It looks for changes only when you call either SaveChanges or Refresh. This raises the question of how long you should keep an object context around. The more entities you ask it for, the more objects it’ll hang on to. Even when your code has finished using a particular entity object, the .NET Framework’s garbage collector won’t be able to reclaim the memory it uses for as long as the object context remains alive, because the object context keeps hold of the entity in case it needs to return it again in a later query. The way to get the object context to let go of everything is to call Dispose. This is why all of the examples that show the creation of an object context do so in a using statement. Object Context | 583 There are other lifetime issues to bear in mind. In some situations, an object context may hold database connections open. And also, if you have a long-lived object context, you may need to add calls to Refresh to ensure that you have fresh data, which you wouldn’t have to do with a newly created object context. So all the signs suggest that you don’t want to keep the object context around for too long. How long is too long? In a web application, if you create an object context while handling a request (e.g., for a particular page) you would normally want to Dispose it before the end of that request—keeping an object context alive across multiple requests is typically a bad idea. In a Windows application (WPF or Windows Forms), it might make sense to keep an object context alive a little longer, because you might want to keep entities around while a form for editing the data in them is open. (If you want to apply updates, you normally use the same object context you used when fetching the entities in the first place, although it’s possible to detach an entity from one context and attach it later to a different one.) In general, though, a good rule of thumb is to keep the object context alive for no longer than is necessary. WCF Data Services The last data access feature we’ll look at is slightly different from the rest. So far, we’ve seen how to write code that uses data in a program that can connect directly to a database. But WCF Data Services lets you present data over HTTP, making data access possible from code in some scenarios where direct connections are not possible. It defines a URI structure for identifying the data you’d like to access, and the data itself can be represented in either JSON or the XML-based Atom Publishing Protocol (AtomPub). As the use of URIs, JSON, and XML suggests, WCF Data Services can be useful in web applications. Silverlight cannot access databases directly, but it can consume data via WCF Data Services. And the JSON support means that it’s also relatively straightfor- ward for script-based web user interfaces to use. WCF Data Services is designed to work in conjunction with the Entity Framework. You don’t just present an entire database over HTTP—that would be a security liability. Instead, you define an Entity Data Model, and you can then configure which entity types should be accessible over HTTP, and whether they are read-only or support other operations such as updates, inserts, or deletes. And you can add code to implement further restrictions based on authentication and whatever security policy you require. (Of course, this still gives you plenty of scope for creating a security liability. You need to think carefully about exactly what information you want to expose.) To show WCF Data Services in action, we’ll need a web application, because it’s an HTTP-based technology. If you create a new project in Visual Studio, you’ll see a Visual C#→Web category on the left, and the Empty ASP.NET Web Application template will suit our needs here. We need an Entity Data Model to define what information we’d 584 | Chapter 14: Databases like to expose—for this example, we’ll use the same EDM we’ve been using all along, so the steps will be the same as they were earlier in the chapter. To expose this data over HTTP, we add another item to the project—under the Visual C#→Web template category we choose the WCF Data Service template. We’ll call the service MyData. Visual Studio will add a MyData.svc.cs file to the project, which needs some tweaking before it’ll expose any data—it assumes that it shouldn’t publish any information that we didn’t explicitly tell it to. The first thing we need to do is modify the base class of the generated MyData class—it derives from a generic class called DataService, but the type argument needs to be filled in—Visual Studio just puts a comment in there telling you what to do. We will plug in the name of the object context class: public class MyData : DataService<AdventureWorksLT2008Entities> This class contains an InitializeService method to which we need to add code for each entity type we’d like to make available via HTTP. Example 14-21 makes all three entity types in the model available for read access. Example 14-21. Making entities available public static void InitializeService(IDataServiceConfiguration config) { config.SetEntitySetAccessRule("Customers", EntitySetRights.AllRead); config.SetEntitySetAccessRule("SalesOrderHeaders", EntitySetRights.AllRead); config.SetEntitySetAccessRule("SalesOrderDetails", EntitySetRights.AllRead); } We can now look at how the data appears. If we press F5, Visual Studio opens a web browser showing the MyData.svc URL for our web application. It shows an XML file describing the available entity types, as Example 14-22 shows. (The exact value you see in the xml:base may be different—it depends on the port number Visual Studio chooses for debugging.) Example 14-22. Available entities described by the web service <service xml:base="http://localhost:1181/MyData.svc/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2007/app"> <workspace> <atom:title>Default</atom:title> <collection href="Customers"> <atom:title>Customers</atom:title> </collection> <collection href="SalesOrderDetails"> <atom:title>SalesOrderDetails</atom:title> </collection> <collection href="SalesOrderHeaders"> WCF Data Services | 585 <atom:title>SalesOrderHeaders</atom:title> </collection> </workspace> </service> Notice that each <collection> element has an href attribute. Typically, href attributes denote a link to another resource, the attribute value being a relative URL. So you can just stick an entity name on the end of the URL. The exact URL will depend on the port number Visual Studio picks for the test web server, but something like http:// localhost:1181/MyData.svc/Customers will return all the customers in the system. There are two things to be aware of when looking at entities in the browser with this sort of URL. First, the simplest URLs will return all the entities of the specified type, which might take a long time. We’ll see how to be more selective in a moment. Second, by default the web browser will notice that the data format being used is a variant of Atom, and will attempt to use the same friendly feed rendering you would get on other Atom- and RSS-based feeds. (Lots of blogs offer an Atom-based feed format.) Unfortunately, the browser’s friendly rendering is aimed at the kind of Atom features usually found in blogs, and it doesn’t always understand AtomPub feeds, so you might just get an error. To deal with the second problem, you could just View Source to see the underlying XML, or you can turn off friendly feed rendering. In IE8, you open the Internet Options window and go to the Content tab. Open the Feed and Web Slice Settings window from there, and uncheck the “Turn on feed reading view” checkbox. (If you’ve already looked at a feed and hit this problem, you might need to close all instances of IE after making this change and try again.) WCF Data Services lets you request a specific entity by putting its primary key inside parentheses at the end of the URL. For example, http://localhost:1181/MyData.svc/ Customers(29531) fetches the customer entity whose ID is 29531. If you try this, you’ll see a simple XML representation of all the property values for the entity. In that same XML document, you’ll also find this element: <link rel="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/related/ SalesOrderHeaders" type="application/atom+xml;type=feed" title="SalesOrderHeaders" href="Customers(29531)/SalesOrderHeaders" /> This is how associations in the EDM show up—if an entity has related entities available through an association, it will offer a link to the URL on which those associations can be found. So as the href in this example shows, you can just stick SalesOrderHeaders on the end of the customer instance URL to get all the related orders for customer 29531, as in the following: 586 | Chapter 14: Databases [...]... makes it easier for C# code to work with data from the database, as well as providing some support for controlling the mapping between the database and the object model representing the data And WCF Data Services is able to take some or all of an Entity Data Model and present it over HTTP, with either AtomPub or JSON, thus making your data available to AJAX and Silverlight clients 588 | Chapter 14: Databases... assembly, the documentation tells you If you look in the Visual Studio help, or online in the MSDN documentation, each class definition tells you which namespace and assembly the class is defined in You’ll notice that Figure 15-2 shows some other tabs The COM tab contains all the COM components Visual Studio has found on your system These are not NET components, but it’s possible to use them from C# as we’ll... Version =4.0. 0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e 089 Naming | 599 The version number changes from time to time, of course—it didn’t look quite like that in NET 1.0 However, the important part here is the PublicKeyToken Assemblies with this feature in their name are called strongly named assemblies But what does that mean? If you add a reference to a strongly named assembly, the C# compiler...http://localhost:1 181 /MyData.svc/Customers(29531)/SalesOrderHeaders So you can see how joins across relationships turn into URLs, and also how simple keybased queries work In fact, the URL syntax also supports more complex queries based on properties For example, this returns all customers whose FirstName has the value Cory: http://localhost:1 181 /MyData.svc/Customers?$filter=FirstName%20eq%20'Cory'... HTTP, with either AtomPub or JSON, thus making your data available to AJAX and Silverlight clients 588 | Chapter 14: Databases CHAPTER 15 Assemblies One of C# s strengths is the ease with which your code can use all sorts of external components All C# programs use the components that make up the NET Framework class library, but many cast their net wider—GUI application developers often buy control libraries,... significant difference is that an executable needs an entry point—the piece of code that runs when the program starts, usually the Main method in C# Libraries don’t have an equivalent, but otherwise, there’s no technical difference between a dll and an exe in NET 589 Of course, libraries normally export functionality It’s less common for executables to do that, but they can if they want to—in NET it’s possible... represent each entity type defined by the service That enables us to write code such as Example 14-23 Example 14-23 Client-side WCF Data Services code var ctx = new AdventureWorksLT2008Entities( new Uri("http://localhost:1 181 /MyData.svc")); var customers = from customer in ctx.Customers where customer.FirstName == "Cory" select customer; foreach (Customer customer in customers) { Console.WriteLine(customer.CompanyName);... could be: select the item in the Solution Explorer and then press the Delete key, or right-click on it and select Remove However, be aware that the C# compiler can do some of the work for you here If your code has a reference to a DLL that it never uses, the C# compiler effectively ignores the reference Your assembly’s metadata includes a list of all the external assemblies you’re using, but the compiler... public static MyType MakeMeAnInstance() { return new MyType(); } } Our MyProgram project can then use this method to get Class1 to construct an instance of MyType on its behalf, as Example 15 -8 shows Example 15 -8 Using a type with an internal constructor from outside MyType o = Class1.MakeMeAnInstance(); NET Components: Assemblies | 597 Example 15-7 shows another reason it can be useful to have a public... information that an WCF Data Service exposes as objects in C# The LINQ query here will generate a suitable URL that encodes the query—filtering by FirstName in this case And as with a database query, it won’t actually make the request until we start to enumerate the results—this LINQ provider follows the usual deferred execution pattern WCF Data Services | 587 The range of query types supported by the WCF Data . withdraw $ 200 . It will write back a new balance of $1 ,0 34. You just withdrew $ 200 and paid $1 ,00 0 to another account, but your account only has $ 200 less in it than before rather than $1, 200 —that’s. xml:base="http://localhost:1 181 /MyData.svc/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/ 200 5/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/ 200 7/app" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ 200 7/app"> . write code such as Example 14- 23. Example 14- 23. Client-side WCF Data Services code var ctx = new AdventureWorksLT 200 8Entities( new Uri("http://localhost:1 181 /MyData.svc")); var customers

Định dạng
Số trang	85
Dung lượng	10,42 MB