Safer Surgery part 25 ppt

Safer Surgery 214 In an ongoing research project, we investigate the relationship between adaptive coordination processes, non-technical skills ratings (Fletcher et al. 2003) and clinical performance of anaesthesia teams in both simulated and live settings during routine situations, as well as when confronted with non-routine events. Within this project we tested the taxonomy of explicit and implicit team coordination and heedful interrelating behaviour presented in Figure 13.1 for inter- rater reliability. This required that two coders independently coded two out of 15 simulated inductions of general anaesthesia. Analyses of Cohen’s Kappa values showed fair to substantial reliability (for Explicit coordination of information exchange κ = .67; for Explicit coordination of actions κ = .63; for Implicit coordination of information exchange κ = .32; for Implicit coordination of actions κ = .76; heedful interrelating (κ = .60) (Landis and Koch 1977).Indeed, these results indicate that the taxonomy we developed for various modes of anaesthesia team Category Definition Example Considering external conditions Includes considerations of conditions outside the team and their consequences. ‘They’re already waiting for us.’ Others Authoritarian behaviour I ncludes behaviours which are aimed at underlining power and status. Grabbing an instrument out of the hand of a team member without explanation. Silence and action Includes situations where team members work silently and independently. Silence and no action Coded if a person is obviously doing nothing at all – not even observing. A team member stands around without paying attention to the process. Chatting Includes non-task-relevant talk. T eam member talks about the weather. Technical alarm Includes technical (acoustic) warning signals from one of the machines. A n alarm goes off. T alking to patient Includes communicating with the patient beyond garnering or imparting clinical information. ‘You will start to feel very sleepy.’ Incompr ehensible communication Serves as a category for anything that is acoustically incomprehensible. Table 13.1 Concluded Measuring Coordination Behaviour in Anaesthesia Teams 215 behaviour allowed reliable measurement of explicit and implicit coordination and heedful interrelating behaviour. In particular, implicit action coordination which is by denition difcult to observe was able to be measured reliably. Only the fair Kappa value for implicit information coordination points out the need for further rening of the respective categories. The specic strengths of the taxonomy are (a) the precise assessment of explicit as well as implicit team coordination behaviour in the anaesthetic work environment in routine as well as non-routine situations and (b) the measurement of heedful behaviour which might serve as a mechanism facilitating the transition between explicit and implicit coordination. With regard to manageability, the hierarchical organization of the taxonomy simplies the coding procedure. Furthermore, the categories are detailed enough to allow for determination of successful coordination behaviour, which in turn helps to design team training interventions. Outlook Within our current research project, we compare the above coordination taxonomy with the observation system developed by Manser and colleagues (2008) and test their sensitivity in detecting teams’ behavioural differences between phases with varying workload in simulated as well as in live clinical settings in anaesthesia. In comparing these two observation methods for coordination behaviour, it is our intention to investigate the main differences between the two systems and how they can complement each other (see also Chapter 14 in this volume by Manser et al.). For instance, the observation system of Manser and colleagues (2008) records not only coordination behaviour but also clinical activities performed by the anaesthesia team and records actions carried out simultaneously. On the other hand, the taxonomy presented in Figure 13.1 focuses particularly on coordination of information exchange and of joint actions and provides a more detailed account of explicit and implicit coordination mechanisms and heedful interrelating. The comparison of the two observation systems will provide the data necessary for us to develop an integrated behaviour and communication observation system and improve methods for analysing team coordination behaviour in the operating room. By exploring the relationships between routine and non-routine event coordination behaviour, non-technical skills and clinical performance with the sketched methodology, the research project is expected to contribute to both our knowledge of adaptive team coordination behaviour and the development of appropriate and reliable methods for studying human factors inuencing levels of effectiveness in anaesthesia. This will allow for improvements in training anaesthesia teams and for enhancing organizational support for adaptive coordination. Safer Surgery 216 Acknowledgement We gratefully acknowledge the nancial support for this project by Swiss National Science Foundation. Also, we thank Raphael Agosti and Silja Barbara Sollberger for their assistance in behaviour coding. The rst author thanks Margarita Neff- Heinrich for her helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter. References Arbous, M.S., Grobee, D.E., van Kleef, J.W., de Lange, J.J., Spoormans, H.H.A.J.M., Touw, P., Werner, F.M. and Meursing, A.E.E. (2001) Mortality associated with anaesthesia: A qualitative analysis to identify risk factors. Anaesthesia 56, 1141–53. Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E. and Berdahl, J.L. (2000) Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaption. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Bakeman, R. (2000) Behavioral observation and coding. In H.T. Reis and C.M Judd (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Bakeman, R. and Gottman, J.M. (1986) Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bales, R.E. (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Beck, D. and Fisch, R. (2000) Argumentation and emotional processes in group decision-making: Illustration of a multi-level interaction process analysis approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3, 183–201. Bijlsma-Frankema, K., de Jong, B. and van de Bunt, G. (2008) Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, 19–40. Bowers, C.A., Jentsch, F., Salas, E. and Braun, C.C. (1998) Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors 40, 672–9. Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C. and Salas, E. (2006) Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 1189–207. Byrne, A.J., Sellen, A.J. and Jones, J.G. (1998) Errors in anaesthetic record charts as a measure of anaesthetic performance during simulated critical incidents. British Journal of Anaesthesia 80, 58–62. Catchpole, K., Bell, M.D.D. and Johnson, S. (2008) Safety on anaesthesia: A study of 12606 reported incidents from the UK national reporting and learning system. Anaesthesia 63, 340–6. Cook, R.I., Render, M. and Woods, D.D. (2000) Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety. British Medical Journal 320, 791–4. Measuring Coordination Behaviour in Anaesthesia Teams 217 Cooper, J.B., Newbower, R.S., Long, C.D. and McPeek, B. (2002) Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Quality and Safety in Health Care 11, 277–83. Cooren, F. (2004) The communicative achievement of collective minding. Management Communication Quarterly 17, 517–51. Dickinson, T.L. and McIntyre, R.M. (1997) A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M.T. Brannick, E. Salas and C. Prince (eds) Team Performance Assessment and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dougherty, D. and Takacs, C.H. (2004) Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation. Long Range Planning 37, 569–90. Druskat, V.U. and Pescosolido, A.T. (2002) The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations 55, 283–314. Edmondson, A.C. (2003) Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies 40, 1419–52. Entin, E.E. and Serfaty, D. (1999) Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors 41, 312–25. Espinosa, A., Lerch, F.J. and Kraut, R.E. (2004) Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not t all. In E. Salas and S.M. Fiore (eds) Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Fiedler, F.E. (1964) A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P., Glavin, R., Maran, N. and Patey, R. (2003) Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): Evaluation of a behavioural marker system. British Journal of Anaesthesia 90, 580–8. Flin, R., Fletcher, G., McGeorge, P., Sutherland, A. and Patey, R. (2003) Anaesthetists’ attitudes to teamwork and safety. Anaesthesia 58, 233–42. Gaba, D.M. (2000) Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. British Medical Journal 320, 785–8. Grommes, P. and Grote, G. (2001) Coordination in action. Comparing two work situations with high vs. low degrees of formalization. In R. Kühnlein, A. Newlands and H. Rieser (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Coordination and Action at Esslli 01. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Grote, G. and Zala-Mezö, E. (2004) The Effects of Different Forms of Coordination in Coping with Work Load: Cockpit Versus Operating Theatre. Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Institut für Arbeitspsychologie. Grote, G., Zala-Mezö, E. and Grommes, P. (2003) Effects of standardization on coordination and communication in high workload situations. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 12, 127–55. Safer Surgery 218 Grote, G., Zala-Mezö, E. and Grommes, P. (2004) The effects of different forms of co-ordination on coping with workload. In R. Dietrich and T.M. Childress (eds) Group Interaction in High Risk Environments. Aldershot: Ashgate. Hackman, J.R. and Morris, C.G. (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press. Heath, C., Sanchez Svensson, M., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P. and vom Lehm, D. (2002) Conguring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11, 317–47. Helmreich, R.L. and Davies, J.M. (1996) Human factors in the operating room: Interpersonal determinants of safety, efciency and morale. Bailliere’s Clinical Anaesthesiology 10, 277–95. Hirokawa, R.Y. (1990) The role of communication in group decision-making efcacy. A task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research 21, 190–204. Kolbe, M. (2007) Coordination of Decision-making in Groups. The Importance of Explicit Coordination Mechanisms. [Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Gruppen. Die Bedeutung expliziter Koordinationsmechanismen.] Saarbrücken: VDM. Kolbe, M. and Boos, M. (2009) Facilitating group decision-making: Facilitators’ subjective theories on group coordination. Qualitative Research on Intercultural Communication 10, doi: 0114-fqs0901287. Available at: <http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901287> [last accessed March 2009]. Künzle, B., Zala-Mezö, E., Kolbe, M., Wacker, J., and Grote, G. (in press). Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics 33, 159–74. Leedal, J.M. and Smith, A.F. (2007) Methodological approaches to anaesthetists’ workload in the operating theatre. British Journal of Anaesthesia 94, 702– 709. LePine, J.A. (2003) Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive abilities and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 27–39. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Baker, G.R., Reznick, R., Bohnen, J., Orser, B., Doran, D. and Grober, E. (2004) Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classication of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13, 330–4. MacMillan, J., Entin, E.E. and Serfaty, D. (2004) Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas and S.M. Fiore (eds) Team Cognition. Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Society. Mangold, P. (2007) Interact. Unpublished manual, Mangold Software and Consulting. Measuring Coordination Behaviour in Anaesthesia Teams 219 Manser, T., Howard, S.K. and Gaba, D.M. (2008) Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: A study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system. Ergonomics 51, 1153–78. Marby, E.A. and Attridge, M.D. (1990) Small group interaction and outcome correlates for structured and unstructured tasks. Small Group Research 21, 315–32. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. and Zaccaro, S.J. (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 26, 356– 76. Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S. and Zaccaro, S.J. (2002) The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 3– 13. Marks, M.A. and Panzer, F.J. (2004) The inuence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance 17, 25–41. Marsch, S.C.U., Müller, C., Marquardt, K., Conrad, G., Tschan, F. and Hunziker, P.R. (2004) Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests. Resuscitation 60, 51–6. Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (1993) Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McGrath, J. E. and Altermatt, T.W. (2002) Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic choices. In M.A. Hogg and S. Tindale (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Boston: Blackwell. Michinov, E., Olivier-Chiron, E., Rusch, E. and Chiron, B. (2008) Inuence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identication in anaesthesia teams. British Journal of Anaesthesia 100, 327–32. Murff, H.J. and Bates, D.W. (2001) Information transfer. In K.G. Shojania, B.W. Duncan, K.M. McDonald and R.M. Wachter (eds) Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. AHRQ Publication. Nyssen, A.S., Hansez, I., Baele, P., Lamy, M. and De Keyser, V. (2003) Occupational stress and burnout in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 90, 333–7. Oken, A., Rasmusson, M.D., Slagle, J.M., Jain, S., Kuykendall, T., Ordonez, N. and Weinger, M.B. (2007) A facilitated survey instrument captures signicantly more anesthesia events than does traditional voluntary event reporting. Anesthesiology 107, 909–22. Orasanu, J.M. (1993) Decision-making in the cockpit. In E.L. Wiener, B.G. Kanki and R.L. Helmreich (eds) Cockpit Resource Management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Phipps, D., Meakin, G.H., Beatty, P.C.W., Nsoedo, C. and Parker, D. (2008) Human factors in anaesthetic practice: Insights from a task analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 100, 333–43. Reason, J. (2005) Safety in the operating theatre – Part 2: Human errors and organisational failure. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14, 56–61. Safer Surgery 220 Rhee, S.Y. (2006) Shared emotions and group effectiveness: The role of broadening- and-building interactions. Academy of Management Best Conference Papers, B1–B6. Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F. and Gibson, C. (2008) Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review 33, 163–84. Risser, D.T., Rice, M.M., Salisbury, M.L., Simon, R., Jay, G.D. and Berns, S.D. (1999) The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 34, 373–83. Rosen, M.A., Salas, E., Wilson, K.A., King, H.B., Salisbury, M.L., Augenstein, J.S. Robinson, D.W. and Birnbach, D.J. (2008) Measuring team performance in simulation-based training: Adopting best practices for healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare 3, 33–41. Salas, E., Sims, D.E. and Burke, C.S. (2005) Is there a ‘Big Five’ in teamwork? Small Group Research 36, 555–99. Salas, E., Nichols, D.R. and Driskell, J.E. (2007a) Testing three team training strategies in intact teams. A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 38, 471– 88. Salas, E., Rosen, M.A. and King, H. (2007b) Managing teams managing crisis: Principles of teamwork to improve patient safety in the emergency room and beyond. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8, 381–94. Schaafstal, A.M., Johnston, J.H. and Oser, R.L. (2001) Training teams for emergency management. Computers in Human Behaviour 17, 615–26. Serfaty, D., Entin, E.E. and Volpe, C. (1993) Adaptation to stress in team decision- making and coordination. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Serfaty, D. and Kleinman, D.L. (1990) Adaptation processes in team decision- making and coordination. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Los Angeles: IEEE. Sexton, J.B., Thomas, E.J. and Helmreich, R.L. (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional surveys. British Medical Journal 320, 745–9. Steiner, I.D. (1972) Group Processes and Productivity. New York: Academic Press. Toups, Z.O. and Kerne, A. (2007) Implicit coordination in reghting practice: Design implications for teaching re emergency responders. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press. Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K., Gautschi, D., Hunziker, P., Spychiger, M. and Marsch, S.U. (2006) Leading to recovery: Group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups. Human Performance 19, 277–304. Measuring Coordination Behaviour in Anaesthesia Teams 221 Vogus, T.J. and Welbourne, T.M. (2003) Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 24, 877–903. Waller, M.J., Gupta, N. and Giambatista, R.C. (2004) Effects of adaptive behaviours and shared mental models on control crew performance. Management Science 50, 1534–44. Wears, R.L. and Sutcliff, K.M. (2003) Promoting heedful interrelating and collective competence in the emergency department. Focus on Patient Safety. A newsletter from the National Patient Safety Foundation 6, 4–5. Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on ight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 357–81. Weingart, L.R. (1997) How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group process. Research in Organizational Behaviour 19, 189–239. Weinger, M.B. and Slagle, J. (2002) Human factors research in anaesthesia patient safety: Techniques to elucidate factors affecting clinical task performance and decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association 9, S58–S63. Wittenbaum, G.M., Stasser, G. and Merry, C.J. (1996) Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, 129–52. Wittenbaum, G.M., Vaughan, S.I. and Stasser, G. (1998) Coordination in task- performing groups. In R.S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E.J. Posavac, F.B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King and J. Myers (eds) Theory and Research on Small Groups. New York: Plenum Press. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hollingshead, A.B., Paulus, P.B., Hirokawa, R.Y., Ancona, D.G., Peterson, R.S., Jehn, K.A. and Yoon, K. (2004) The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups. Small Group Research 35, 17–43. Young, G., Zavelina, L. and Hooper, V. (2008) Assessment of workload using NASA task load index in perianesthesia nursing. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 23, 102–10. Zala-Mezö, E., Wacker, J., Künzle, B., Brüsch, M. and Grote, G. (2009) The inuence of standardisation and task load on team coordination patterns during anaesthesia inductions. Quality and Safety in Health Care 18, 127–130. This page has been left blank intentionally Chapter 14 Identifying Characteristics of Effective Teamwork in Complex Medical Work Environments: Adaptive Crew Coordination in Anaesthesi a Tanja Manser, Steven K. Howard and David M. Gaba Introduction The aim of psychological research on the relationship between human performance and patient safety is to support healthcare professionals and their organizations to provide patient care more safely, in a wider variety of clinical situations, with greater efciency and with increased satisfaction to both patients and practitioners. Such recommendations require an improved understanding of the performance of clinicians in terms of the strengths and vulnerabilities pertaining to their work environment. Although ‘performance’ is an intuitively meaningful concept, research on human performance in complex work environments usually has to integrate the complementary pieces of information provided by different research approaches, none of which by itself captures the entire picture (Gaba et al. 1998, Rall and Gaba 2004, Salvendy 2006). Sources of information include retrospective analyses of incident reports (i.e., reconstructive approach to human performance), prospective observation of routine patient care (i.e., naturalistic approach to human performance), prospective observation of the response to simulated events (i.e., quasi-experimental approach to human performance) and objective data from articial laboratory tasks (i.e., experimental approach to human performance). Both work/organizational psychology and applied cognitive psychology have successfully developed methodological approaches to address human performance issues in complex work environments. The methodological spectrum ranges from ethnographic eld studies to experimental studies in laboratory settings and from qualitative interviews to survey instruments (Bungard and Herrmann 1993, Salvendy 2006). However, methods need to be adapted to the specics of the complex medical work environment. For example, systems to evaluate the performance of two-person cockpit crews will not capture the dynamics of a multidisciplinary medical team with uid team membership. In recent years, signicant progress has been made in this area. Prominent examples are instruments for non-technical skills rating (Fletcher et al. 2004, Healey et al 2004, . 333–43. Reason, J. (2005) Safety in the operating theatre – Part 2: Human errors and organisational failure. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14, 56–61. Safer Surgery 220 Rhee, S.Y. (2006) Shared emotions. training anaesthesia teams and for enhancing organizational support for adaptive coordination. Safer Surgery 216 Acknowledgement We gratefully acknowledge the nancial support for this project by. and communication in high workload situations. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 12, 127–55. Safer Surgery 218 Grote, G., Zala-Mezö, E. and Grommes, P. (2004) The effects of different forms of