Hướng dẫn học Microsoft SQL Server 2008 part 71 doc

Nielsen c27.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 8:27pm Page 662 Part IV Developing with SQL Server Developing DDL Triggers ThecodeinthetriggerisnormalT-SQLcode.Insome way, a DDL trigger is easier to write than a DML trigger because DDL triggers always fire for a single event, whereas DML triggers must handle events with multiple affected rows involving the base table, and the inserted and deleted virtual tables. The complexity of the DDL trigger results from the fact that the data about the event is in XML. EventData() DDL triggers can respond to so many different events that they need some method of capturing data about the event that caused them to fire. DML triggers have the inserted and deleted virtual tables; DDL triggers have the EventData() function. This function returns XML-formatted data about the event. The XML schema varies according to the type of event captured. Note that parts of the XML schema are case sensitive. Using the EventData() function to populate an XML variable, the trigger can use XQuery to investi- gate the values. Use the XQuery Value() method to extract the data from the XML. The XML schema for event data is at C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Tools\ Binn\schemas\sqlserver\2006\11\events\events.xsd Alternatively, the event schema is published at http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver. The following code example creates a DDL trigger that reads EventData() into an XML variable and then selects from the variable to display the data: CREATE TRIGGER DDLTrigger ON DATABASE FOR CREATE_TABLE AS Set NoCount ON DECLARE @EventData XML = EventData() SELECT @EventData.value (’data(/EVENT_INSTANCE/SchemaName)[1]’,’VARCHAR(50)’) as ‘Schema’, @EventData.value (’data(/EVENT_INSTANCE/ObjectName)[1]’, ‘VARCHAR(50)’) as ‘Object’, @EventData.value (’data(/EVENT_INSTANCE/EventType)[1]’, ‘VARCHAR(50)’) as ‘EventType’ With the DDL triggers in place, the next comamnd creates a table, which fires the trigger, which examines EventData’s XML, and returns the values to the client: CREATE TABLE Test (Col1 INT) 662 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c27.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 8:27pm Page 663 DDL Triggers 27 Result: Schema Object EventType dbo Test CREATE_TABLE F or more on XML and working with XQuery, see Chapter 18, ‘‘Manipulating XML Data.’’ Preventing database object changes DDL triggers can execute code, including executing a transaction rollback command. Such a trigger could prohibit anyone from making server- or database-level changes. The following code is a simple example of a rollback DDL trigger blocking any stored procedures from being altered in the database: CREATE TRIGGER NoTouchDaProc ON DATABASE FOR ALTER_PROCEDURE, DROP_PROCEDURE AS Set NoCount ON Raiserror (’These Procs may not be altered or dropped!’,16,1) Rollback To test the DDL trigger, the next few commands attempt to modify the procedure so it won’t print ‘‘SQL Rocks!’’: DROP PROC QuickProc Result: Msg 50000, Level 16, State 1, Procedure NoTouchDaProc, Line 6 These Procs may not be altered or dropped! Msg 3609, Level 16, State 2, Procedure QuickProc, Line 3 The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted. And ALTER PROC QuickProc AS Print ‘Oracle Rocks!’ Result: Msg 50000, Level 16, State 1, Procedure NoTouchDaProc, Line 6 These Procs may not be altered or dropped! Msg 3609, Level 16, State 2, Procedure QuickProc, Line 3 The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted. 663 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c27.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 8:27pm Page 664 Part IV Developing with SQL Server W ith DDL triggers, you can write your own system to prevent object changes that disagree with your shop’s policies, but a more strategic solution might be to use SQL Server 2008’s new policy-based management feature, documented in Chapter 40, ‘‘Policy-Based Management.’’ Summary DDL triggers provide a safety net — a way to track every change to the schema. The event model that can be tracked is comprehensive and the data available to the trigger using the EventData() function and XML is dynamic and complete. Without a doubt, DDL triggers serve their purpose well. Highlights from this chapter are as follows: ■ Server-level DDL triggers can trap any event and are seen in Object Explorer under the Server Objects ➪ Triggers node. ■ Database-level DDL triggers exist in the user database, can only fire for database-level events, and are listed in Object Explorer in the [Database] ➪ Programmability ➪ Database Triggers node. ■ DDL Triggers can fire for any specific DDL event, or for DDL Event Groups — a hierarchy of DDL events. ■ Because DDL triggers can fire for such a broad range of events, the EventData() function returns XML data about the event. The next chapter continues the theme of developing with SQL Server with the critical concepts of build- ing out the abstraction layer. 664 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 665 Building Out the Data Abstraction Layer IN THIS CHAPTER Buying database extensibility Building CRUD stored procedures Searching stored procedures I recently blogged the question, ‘‘Why use stored procedures?’’ (http:// tinyurl.com/ohauye ) and received a firestorm of replies. I invite you to add your view to the replies — let’s attempt the most replies on SQLBlog.com. My post is based on the discussion of extensibility presented in Chapter 2, ‘‘Data Architecture,’’ and makes the point that the abstraction layer should be as perma- nent as the data it encapsulates. The only effective data abstraction layer is T-SQL. One of the talks I give at conferences is ‘‘7 SQL Server development practices more evil than cursors.’’ What’s the number one worst development practice on my list? Ad-hoc SQL, because it violates the abstraction layer and creates a brittle database. There are many good reasons for wrapping the database in a protective layer of stored procedures: ■ Extensibility: It’s far easier to modify the database when there’s a consistent contract to access the database. ■ Usability: It’s far easier for application developers to call a set of stored procedure API calls that return the correct result set than for them to write correct SQL queries. ■ Integrity: The goal is to get the correct answer to the question. Stored procedures written by database developers will include better queries than ad-hoc SQL written by application developers. ■ Performance: Moving the lookups and validation closer to the data improves performance. ■ Security: The best security (tighter control, reduced surface area, limits SQL injection) passes all database access through stored procedures and blocks any direct access to the tables. 665 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 666 Part IV Developing with SQL Server The basic idea is that a contract, or API agreement, drives development on both the database and the client side. If the database developers want to refactor the database to increase performance or integrity or add new features that don’t change the API, then they are free to do so without affecting any other code. If the application needs a new feature that affects the API, then both sides need to agree on the change and can work on the modification independently until both are ready for integration testing. CRUD Stored Procedures Generally speaking, the data abstraction layer needs an interface for each table for each of the following tasks: ■ Searching for multiple rows ■ Fetching a single row ■ Inserting new data ■ Updating existing data ■ Deleting existing data Each of these stored procedures should include data validation, transaction control, and error handling. For lookup tables, some choose to build a more dynamic solution that allows a single set of stored pro- cedures to work against multiple tables by making the table name a parameter and dynamically building the FROM clause within the stored procedure. For examples of these stored procedures, please download the latest version of the OBXKites sample database from www.sqlserverbible.com. I’m also considering developing an AutoCRUD utility that will code-gen CRUD stored procedures. If you’d like to use such a utility, please e-mail me at pauln@sqlserverbible.com. Best Practice W hen designing the data abstraction layer, avoid using a CRUD matrix approach — CRUD being a list of create, retrieve, update, and delete functions for every table. A data abstraction layer — that is, a set of sprocs for every table — will tend to lock in the schema to that set of sprocs. Instead, design the data abstraction layer as a set of logical contracts that deal with business entities and tasks, even though the contract may involve multiple underlying tables. For example, design a single interface that involves the inventory, order, and shipping tables. Decreasing the inventory count for an item might involve updating the count field, triggering a reorder, and updating a physical capacity table. You want to ensure that one contract does it all. 666 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 667 Building Out the Data Abstraction Layer 28 Google-Style Search Procedure Of the standard data abstraction layer stored procedures, the most interesting one is the search stored procedure. This Google-style search comes from Nordic (New Object/Relational Design) version 2.09 — my CodePlex.com project that transforms SQL Server into an object database. It works very well even against millions of rows. Of course, this is a work in progress, so please get the newest version from CodePlex.com or SQLServerBible.com. The goal of the Google-style search is to enable users to enter as many search words as desired in any order and then find the best results. I’ve had a lot of fun designing this search routine. The common solution is to use dynamic SQL to generate a complex WHERE clause. This solution instead splits the @SearchString words entry into a set-based list and stores the search words in a table vari- able. The table variable is then joined with several data sources — names, object code, and a list of data extracted from searchable columns. Each time a row is found it’s added to the # Results table. As the row is found multiple times, its hits counter is incremented. At the end, the rows with the most hits are sorted to the top of the list. This search also handles class, workflow state, and association filters, which are shown toward the end of the listing: Create alter PROC SearchObjects (@ClassID INT, @StateID INT = NULL, @SearchString VARCHAR(500) = NULL, @AssocMMID INT = NULL, @HASAssoc BIT = 0) WITH recompile AS CREATE TABLE #Results ( ObjectID INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY , Hits TINYINT NULL ); CREATE TABLE #Classes (ClassID INT) INSERT #Classes SELECT ClassID FROM dbo.SubClassesID(@ClassID) DECLARE @SQL NVARCHAR(MAX) SET NoCount ON IF @SearchString = ‘’ SET @SearchString = NULL All in class search 667 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 668 Part IV Developing with SQL Server IF @SearchString IS NULL AND @StateID IS NULL INSERT #Results (ObjectID, Hits) SELECT top(1000) o.ObjectID, 1 FROM Object o JOIN #Classes c ON o.ClassID = c.ClassID LEFT JOIN dbo.State s ON o.StateID = s.StateID WHERE o.ClassID IN (SELECT ClassID FROM dbo.SubClassesID(@ClassID)) All in class / state search IF @SearchString IS NULL AND @StateID IS NOT NULL INSERT #Results (ObjectID, Hits) SELECT top(1000) o.ObjectID, 1 FROM Object o JOIN #Classes c ON o.ClassID = c.ClassID JOIN dbo.State s ON o.StateID = s.StateID WHERE o.StateID = @StateID save search string IF @SearchString IS NOT NULL BEGIN DECLARE @User SYSNAME SET @User = SUSER_SNAME() upsert UPDATE dbo.SearchHistory SET LastViewDate = GETDATE() WHERE SearchString = @SearchString AND [User] = @User IF @@RowCount = 0 rewrite as MERGE INSERT dbo.SearchHistory ([User], SearchString, LastViewDate) VALUES (@User, @SearchString, GETDATE()) Object Code Exact match / first word entry / regardless of class / state / associations / anything IF Exists(SELECT * FROM dbo.Object WHERE ObjectCode = @SearchString) BEGIN EXEC SearchObjects_ObjectCode @SearchString RETURN END 668 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 669 Building Out the Data Abstraction Layer 28 Parse out multiple search words DECLARE @SearchWords TABLE (Word VARCHAR(50)) INSERT @SearchWords (Word) SELECT String FROM dbo.String2Set(LTRIM(RTRIM(@SearchString))) Exact Name2 Match - 1 points should be a merge INSERT #Results (ObjectID, Hits) SELECT ObjectID, 1 FROM @SearchWords W JOIN dbo.Object O ON O.Name2 = W.Word JOIN #Classes C ON O.ClassID = C.ClassID GROUP BY ObjectID Exact Name1 Match - 1 points MERGE #Results AS R USING ( SELECT ObjectID , COUNT(*) as Hits FROM @SearchWords W JOIN dbo.Object O ON O.Name1 = W.Word JOIN #Classes C ON O.ClassID = C.ClassID GROUP BY ObjectID )asS ON R.ObjectID = S.ObjectID WHEN Matched THEN UPDATE SET Hits += R.Hits WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT (ObjectID, Hits) VALUES(ObjectID, 1); Name1 Soundex - 1 point MERGE #Results AS R USING ( SELECT ObjectID FROM @SearchWords W JOIN dbo.Object O ON O.Name1Soundex = Soundex(W.Word) JOIN #Classes C ON O.ClassID = C.ClassID) as S 669 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 670 Part IV Developing with SQL Server ON R.ObjectID = S.ObjectID WHEN Matched THEN UPDATE SET Hits = R.Hits + 1 WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT (ObjectID, Hits) VALUES(ObjectID, 1); Name2 Soundex - 1 point MERGE #Results AS R USING ( SELECT ObjectID FROM @SearchWords W JOIN dbo.Object O ON O.Name2Soundex = Soundex(W.Word) JOIN #Classes C ON O.ClassID = C.ClassID) as S ON R.ObjectID = S.ObjectID WHEN Matched THEN UPDATE SET Hits = R.Hits + 1 WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT (ObjectID, Hits) VALUES(ObjectID, 1); Exact Seachable Column Match - 1 point per hit MERGE #Results AS R USING ( SELECT ObjectID, COUNT(*) as Hits FROM SearchWordList SWL JOIN @SearchWords W ON SWL.Word = W.Word JOIN #Classes C ON O.ClassID = C.ClassID GROUP BY ObjectID) as S ON R.ObjectID = S.ObjectID WHEN Matched THEN UPDATE SET Hits = R.Hits + S.Hits WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN INSERT (ObjectID, Hits) VALUES(ObjectID, 1); END @SearchString IS NOT NULL apply filters IF @StateID IS NOT NULL 670 www.getcoolebook.com Nielsen c28.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 4:58pm Page 671 Building Out the Data Abstraction Layer 28 DELETE #Results WHERE ObjectID IN (SELECT ObjectID FROM dbo.Object WHERE StateID <> @StateID) IF @AssocMMID IS NOT NULL AND @HASAssoc = 0 DELETE #Results WHERE ObjectID NOT IN (SELECT ObjectID FROM Association A JOIN AssociationMatrix AM ON A.AssociationMatrixID = AM.AssociationMatrixID JOIN dbo.ClassStateAssociationMatrix CSAM ON AM.AssociationMatrixID = CSAM.AssociationMatrixID WHERE AM.AssociationMatrixMasterID = @AssocMMID) IF @AssocMMID IS NOT NULL AND @HASAssoc = 1 DELETE #Results WHERE ObjectID IN (SELECT ObjectID FROM Association A JOIN AssociationMatrix AM ON A.AssociationMatrixID = AM.AssociationMatrixID JOIN dbo.ClassStateAssociationMatrix CSAM ON AM.AssociationMatrixID = CSAM.AssociationMatrixID WHERE AM.AssociationMatrixMasterID = @AssocMMID) Return Results SELECT TOP 1000 o.ObjectID, c.ClassID, c.ClassName, s.StateID, s.StateName, o.ObjectCode, o.Name1, o.Name2, ‘(’ + Cast(r.Hits as VARCHAR(9)) + ‘) ’ + IsNull(dbo.SearchDetails(o.ObjectID),’’) AS Descript, o.Created, o.Modified, o.Version FROM #Results r JOIN dbo.Object o ON r.ObjectID = o.ObjectID JOIN dbo.Class c ON o.ClassID = c.ClassID LEFT JOIN dbo.State s ON o.StateID = s.StateID WHERE r.Hits > (Select max(Hits) /2 FROM #Results) ORDER BY r.Hits DESC, ObjectCode RETURN The real point of this procedure isn’t the cool way it searches multiple locations for multiple words, but that the API is very stable. I have refactored the search stored procedure dozens of times, sometimes even changing the table structures, without ever having to alter the .NET client code. 671 www.getcoolebook.com . at C:Program Files Microsoft SQL Server 100Tools Binnschemassqlserver200611eventsevents.xsd Alternatively, the event schema is published at http://schemas .microsoft. com/sqlserver. The following. Nielsen c27.tex V4 - 07/23/2009 8:27pm Page 662 Part IV Developing with SQL Server Developing DDL Triggers ThecodeinthetriggerisnormalT-SQLcode.Insome way, a DDL trigger is easier to write. your shop’s policies, but a more strategic solution might be to use SQL Server 2008 s new policy-based management feature, documented in Chapter 40, ‘‘Policy-Based Management.’’ Summary DDL triggers