1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

Handbook Phần Cứng PU part 36 pdf

6 259 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 6
Dung lượng 141,79 KB

Nội dung

Hardware manufacturers One of the first manufacturers of sound cards for the IBM PC was AdLib, who produced a card based on the Yamaha YM3812 sound chip, aka the OPL2. The AdLib had two modes: A 9-voice mode where each voice could be fully programmed, and a lesser-used "percussion" mode that used 3 regular voices to produce 5 independent percussion-only voices for a total of 11. (The percussion mode was considered inflexible by most developers, so it was used mostly by AdLib's own composition software.) Creative Labs also marketed a sound card at the same time called the Creative Music System. Although the C/MS had twelve voices to AdLib's nine, and was a stereo card while the AdLib was mono, the basic technology behind it was based on the Philips SAA 1099 which was essentially a square-wave generator. Sounding not unlike twelve simultaneous PC speakers, it never caught on the way the AdLib did, even after Creative marketed it a year later through Radio Shack as the Game Blaster. The Game Blaster retailed for under $100 and included the hit game title Silpheed. Probably the most significant historical change in the history of sound cards came when Creative Labs produced the Sound Blaster card. The Sound Blaster cloned the AdLib, and also added a sound coprocessor to record and play back digital audio (presumably an Intel microcontroller, which Creative incorrectly called a "DSP" to suggest it was a digital signal processor), a game port for adding a joystick, and the ability to interface to MIDI equipment (using the game port and a special cable). With more features at nearly the same price point, and compatibility with existing AdLib titles, most first-time buyers chose the Sound Blaster. The Sound Blaster eventually outsold the AdLib and set the stage for dominating the market. The Sound Blaster line of cards, in tandem with the first cheap CD-ROM drives and evolving video technology, ushered in a new era of multimedia computer applications that could play back CD audio, add recorded dialogue to computer games, or even reproduce motion video (albeit at much lower resolutions and quality). The widespread adoption of Sound Blaster support in multimedia and entertainment titles meant that future sound cards such as Media Vision's Pro Audio Spectrum and the Gravis Ultrasound needed to address Sound Blaster compatibility if they were to compete against it. [edit] Industry adoption When game company Sierra On-Line opted to support add-on music hardware (instead of built-in hardware such as the PC speaker and built-in sound capabilities of the IBM PCjr and Tandy 1000), the concept of what sound and music could be on the IBM PC changed dramatically. Two of the companies Sierra partnered with were Roland and Adlib, opting to produce in-game music for King's Quest 4 that supported the Roland MT-32 and Adlib Music Synthesizer. The MT-32 had superior output quality, due in part to its method of sound synthesis as well as built-in reverb. Being the most sophisticated synthesizer they supported, Sierra chose to use most of the MT-32's custom features and unconventional instrument patches to produce background sound effects (birds chirping, horses clopping, etc.) before the Sound Blaster brought playing real audio clips to the PC entertainment world. Many game companies would write for the MT-32, but support the Adlib as an alternative due to the latter's higher market base. The adoption of the MT-32 lead the way for the creation of the MPU-401/Roland Sound Canvas and General MIDI standards as the most common means of playing in-game music until the mid-1990s. [edit] Feature evolution Most ISA bus soundcards could not record and play digitized sound simultaneously, mostly due to inferior card DSPs. Later PCI bus cards fixed these limitations and are mostly full-duplex. For years, soundcards had only one or two channels of digital sound (most notably the Sound Blaster series and their compatibles) with the notable exception of the Gravis Ultrasound family, which had hardware support for up to 32 independent channels of digital audio. Early games and MOD-players needing more channels than the card could support had to resort to mixing multiple channels in software. Today, most good quality sound cards have hardware support for at least 16 channels of digital audio, but others, like those that utilize cheap audio codecs, still rely partially or completely on software to mix channels, through either device drivers or the operating system itself to perform a software downmix of multiple audio channels. [edit] Sound devices other than expansion cards [edit] Integrated sound on the PC In 1984, the IBM PCjr debuted with a rudimentary 3-voice sound synthesis chip, the SN76489, capable of generating three square-wave tones with variable amplitude, and a pseudo white noise channel that could generate primitive percussion sounds. The Tandy 1000, initially being a clone of the PCjr, duplicated this functionality, with the Tandy TL/SL/RL line adding digital sound recording/playback capabilities. In the late 1990s, many computer manufacturers began to replace plug-in soundcards with a "codec" (actually a combined audio AD/DA-converter) integrated into the motherboard. Many of these used Intel's AC97 specification. Others used cheap ACR slots. As of 2005, these "codecs" usually lack the hardware for direct music synthesis or even multi-channel sound, with special drivers and software making up for these lacks, at the expense of CPU speed (for example, MIDI reproduction takes away 10-15% CPU time on an Athlon XP 1600+ CPU). Nevertheless, some manufacturers offered (and offer, as of 2006) motherboards with integrated "real" (non-codec) soundcards usually in the form of a custom chipset providing e.g. full ISA or PCI Soundblaster compatibility, thus saving an expansion slot while providing the user with a (relatively) high quality soundcard. [edit] Integrated sound on other platforms Various computers which do not use the IBM PC architecture, such as Apple's Macintosh, and workstations from manufacturers like Sun have had their own motherboard integrated sound devices. In some cases these provide very advanced capabilities (for the time of manufacture), in most they are minimal systems. Some of these platforms have also had sound cards designed for their bus architectures which of course cannot be used in a standard PC. [edit] USB sound cards While not literally sound cards (since they don't plug into slots inside of a computer, and usually are not card-shaped (rectangular)), there are devices called USB sound cards. These attach to a computer via USB cables. The USB specification defines a standard interface, the USB audio device class, allowing a single driver to work with the various USB sound devices on the market. [edit] Other outboard sound devices USB Sound Cards are far from the first external devices allowing a computer to record or synthesize sound. Virtually any method that was once common for getting an electrical signal in or out of a computer has probably been used to attempt to produce sound. [edit] Driver architecture To use a sound card, the operating system typically requires a specific device driver. Some operating systems include the drivers for some or all cards available, in other cases the drivers are supplied with the card itself, or are available for download.  DOS programs for the IBM PC often had to use universal middleware driver libraries ([such as HMI Sound Operating System, Miles Sound System etc.) which had drivers for most common sound cards, since DOS itself had no real concept of a sound card. Some card manufacturers provided (sometimes inefficient) middleware TSR-based drivers for their products, and some programs simply had drivers incorporated into the program itself for the sound cards that were supported.  Microsoft Windows uses proprietary drivers generally written by the sound card manufacturers. Many makers supply the drivers to Microsoft for inclusion on Windows distributions. Sometimes drivers are also supplied by the individual vendors for download and installation. Bug fixes and other improvements are likely to be available faster via downloading, since Windows CDs cannot be updated as frequently as a web or FTP site. Vista will use UAA.  A number of versions of UNIX make use of the portable Open Sound System. Drivers are seldom produced by the card manufacturer. o Most Linux-based distributions make use of the Advanced Linux Sound Architecture, but have taken measures to remain compatible with the Open Sound System. KHÁM PHÁ BÍ ẨN VỀ PSU (Power Supply Unit ) Đối với máy tính, PSU như 1 trái tim , quyết định rất lớn đến độ bền của toàn bộ hệ thống, còn đối với dân OCers PSU lại càng có 1 ý nghĩa quan trọng hơn nữa vì nó quyết định khả năng OC và độ an toàn khi ép xung cao độ. Bài viết này chủ yếu để phổ biến thêm những kiến thức cơ bản và xoáy vào những điểm "HOT" của bộ nguồn máy tính hiện nay. Chuẩn ATX 1.3 và 2.X! những điều cần biết Hiện tại 2 chuẩn ATX phổ biến là chuẩn 1.3 và chuẩn 2.x (bên cạnh các chuẩn dành cho server của INTEL và AMD - xin phép không lạm bàn ở đây). Nhận biết: ATXV1.3 chỉ có 1 đường (rail) 12V và có thể có hoặc kô có đầu cấp nguồn SATA, thường thì các PSU chuẩn ATX V1.3 có hiệu suất thấp – chỉ đạt ~ 60 % - Và có đường điện chính là đường 5V (công suất 5V rất cao) (thích hợp cho những main cấp 5V cho CPU như BIOSTAR M7NCG và một số main AMD khác). Các bộ nguồn ATX chuẩn mới hơn (2.x) thì có đường điện chính là đường 12V (max là 18A cho mỗi rail đối với PSU có 2 rail 12V , nếu vượt quá giới hạn trên thì độ nhiễu sẽ tăng ) trang bị đầu cấp nguồn SATA (bắt buộc), cấp nguồn PCie (VGA), 12V+ (cho main board) bên cạnh những đầu cấp nguồn HDD, Floopy thông thường, hiệu suất của PSU ATXV2.x thường đạt >70% một số PSU cao cấp có thể lên tới 80% (như dòng ANTEC phantom). Theo xu hướng thời đại , chuẩn ATX 2.x đã và đang dần thay thế chuẩn ATX 1.3. . software making up for these lacks, at the expense of CPU speed (for example, MIDI reproduction takes away 10-15% CPU time on an Athlon XP 1600+ CPU). Nevertheless, some manufacturers offered (and. Sierra partnered with were Roland and Adlib, opting to produce in-game music for King's Quest 4 that supported the Roland MT-32 and Adlib Music Synthesizer. The MT-32 had superior output. video technology, ushered in a new era of multimedia computer applications that could play back CD audio, add recorded dialogue to computer games, or even reproduce motion video (albeit at

Ngày đăng: 03/07/2014, 13:20