794 5 Safety and Risk i n Engineering Design Andrews JD, Moss TR (1993) Reliability and risk assessment. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Andrews JD, Pattison RL (1997) Optimal safety system performance. In: Proc Reliability and Maintainability Symp, Philadelphia, PA, pp 76–83 ANSTO (1994) The safety of nuclear power reactors. Nuclear Services Section Background Paper, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation APT Maintenance (1999) Cost/risk evaluation & optimisation of planned maintenance. Asset Per- formance Tools, Berkshire Aven T (1992) Reliability and risk analysis, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam Bäck T (1994) Parallel optimisation of evolutionary algorithms. In: Proc Int Conf Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 418–427 Beaumont GP (1986) Probability and random variables. Ellis Horwood, New York Bellman RE, Dreyfus E (1962) Appl ied dynamic programming. Pri nceton University Press, Prince- ton, NJ Ben Brahim S, Smith A, Bidanda B (1992) Estimating product performance and quality from design parameters via neural networks. In: Proc IIE Research Conf, p p 319–323 Blandford A, Butterworth B, Duke D, Good J, Milner R, Young R (1999) Programmable user modelling applications: incorporating human factors concerns into the design and safety engi- neering of com ple x control systems. Middlesex University Work Pap WP22, EPSRC Res Pap GR/L00391 Bourne AJ, Edwards GT, Watson IA (1981) Defences against common mode failures i nredundancy systems. SRD R196, UKAEA Bowles JB, Bonnell RD (1994) Failure mode effects and criticality analysis. In: Proc Annu Relia- bility and Maintainability Symp, pp 1–34 Bradley J (2001) A risk hypothesis and risk measures for throughput capacity in systems. Rep Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary Bryant RE (1986) Graph-based algorithms for Boolean function manipulation. IEEE Trans Com- puters 35(8) Chryssolouris G, Lee M, Pierce J, Domroese M (1989) Use of neural networks f or the design of manufacturing systems. Proc American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 57–63 Coit DW, Smith AE (1994) Use o f a genetic algorithm to optimize a combinatorial reliability design problems. In: Proc 3rd Int Engineering Research Conf, pp 467–472 Coit DW, Smith AE (1996) Stochastic form ulations of the redundancy allocation problem. In: Proc 5th Industrial Engineering Research Conf, Minneapolis, MN, pp 459–463 Cvetkovic D, Parmee IC (1998) Evolutionary design and multi-objective optimisation. In: EUFIT, Aachen, pp 397–401 Cvetkovic D, Parmee IC, Webb E (1998) Multi-objective optimisation and preliminary design. In: Parmee IC (ed) Adaptive computing in design and manufacture. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Ne w York, pp 255–267 DEF STAN 00-58 (2000) HAZOP studies on systems containing programmable electronics. Part 2. General application guidance. Ministry of Defence, Defence Standard 00-58, Issue 2, 19 de Gelder P (1997) Deterministic and probabilistic safety analyses. Rep AVN AIB-Vinçotte Nu- clear, AVN-97/014, O/Ref 97-2635/PDG, Class XP.00.NS DOE-NE-STD-1004-92 (1992) Root cause analysis: guidance document. DOE Guideline, US De- partment of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Washington, DC Doerre P (1987) Som e inconsistencies in CCF data e valuation and interpretation. In: Proc N ational Reliability Conf EC (1996) Safety machinery—principles for risk assessment. European Community Rep EN 1050 ECI (2001) Designing for safe and healthy construction. Int Conf Designing for Safe and Healthy Construction, June 2000, European Construction Institute (ECI), Conseil Internationale du Bâ- timent (CIB W99), London Edwards GT, Watson IA (1979) A study of common mode failures. SRD R146 UKAEA ExSys (2000) The ExSys Knowledge Automation Expert Systems Program. ExSys Inc, Albu- querque, NM 5.5 Revie w Exercises and References 795 Extend (2001) Extend performance modelling for decision support. Imagine That Inc, San Jos e , CA Farell AE, Roat SD (1994) Framework for enhancing fault diagnosis capabilities of artificial neural networks. Computers Chem Eng 18(7):613–635 Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Fodor J, Roubens M (1994) Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer, Dordrecht Fusaro RL (1998) Feasibility of using neural network models to accelerate the testing of mechani- cal systems. NASA Glenn’s Research & Technology Reports, NASA Lewis Research Center Fyffe DE, Hines WW, Lee NK (1968) System reliability allocation and a computational algorithm. IEEE Trans Reliability R-17:64–69 Gertman DI, Blackman HS (1994) Human reliability & safety analysis data handbook, 1st edn. Wiley, New York Ghare PM, Taylor RE (1969) Optimal redundancy for reliability in series system. Operations Res 17:838–847 Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization & machine learning. Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA Hanks BJ (1998) An appreciation of common cause failures i n reliability. Proc Inst M ec h Engrs 212 Part E:31–35 Haykin S (1999) Neural networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Clif fs, NJ Holland J (1992) Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, pp 44–50 Hughes RP (1987) A new approach to common-cause failure. Reliability Eng System Safety 17:211–236 ICS (2003) The Pro-RAM Artificial Intelligence Based Blackboard Model for Engineering Design. ICS Industrial Consulting Services, Gold Coast City, Queensland Ida K, Gen M, Yokota T (1994) System reliability optimisation with several failure modes by genetic algorithm. In: P roc 16t h Int Conf Computers and Industrial Engineering, pp 349–352 IEC 60300-3-9 (1995) Dependability management. Part 3. Application Guide Section 9. Risk Anal- ysis of Technological Systems. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Geneva Ilott PW, Griffiths AJ (1997) Fault diagnosis of pumping machinery using artificial neural net- works. Proc Inst M ech Engrs 211 Part E:185–194 Ilott PW, Griffiths AJ, Wililarns JM (1995) Condition monitoring of pumping systems. In: Proc 8th Natl Congr Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management, 1, pp 369–376 INPO 84-027 (1984) An Analysis of root causes in 1983 significant ev ent reports. Rep 84-027, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), Atlanta, GA INPO NUMARC (1985) A maintenance analysis of safety significant events. NUMARC Com- mittee Pap, Maintenance Work Group, Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), Atlanta, GA Isograph (2001) The AvSim c Availability Simulation Model. Isograph, Irvine, CA Kepner CH, Tregoe BB (1981) The new rational manager. Princeton Research Press, Princeton, NJ Kletz T (1999) HAZOP and HAZAN: identifying and assessing process industry hazards. Institu- tion of Chemical Engineers (IchemE), Warwickshire Lefebvre C, Principe J (2002) NeuroSolutions: a network simulation environment. NeuroDimen- sion, Gainesville, FL Lippmann RP (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag, pp 4–22 Marshall J, Newman R (1998) Reliability enhancement methodology and modeling for electronic equipment—the REMM Project. Proc ERA Avionics, pp 4.2.1–4.2.13 Matlab (1995) Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User’s Guide. MathWorks, Natick, MA McManus JW (1991) Design and analysis tools for concurrent blackboard systems. In: 10th AIAA/IEEE Proc Digital Avionics Systems McManus JW (1992) Design and analysis techniques for concurrent blackboard systems. PhD T he- sis, Faculty of the Department of Computer Science, College of William and Mary, Williams- burg, VA 796 5 Safety and Risk i n Engineering Design Meisl C (1988) Techniques for cost estimating in early program phases. Eng Costs Production Economics 14:95–106 Michael J, Wood W ( 1989) Design t o cost. Wiley, New York Mileham R A, Currie CG, Miles AW, Bradford DT (1993) A parametric approach to cost estimating at the conceptual stage of design. J Eng Design 4(2):117–125 MIL-HDBK-217F (1998) Reliability prediction of electronic equipment. Notice 2 (217F-2), De- partment of Defense, Washington, DC MIL-HDBK-764 (MI) (1990) System Safety Engineering Design Guide for Army Materiel. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-882 (1962) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equip- ment. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-882A (1977) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equipment. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-882B (1984) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equipment. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-882C (1993) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equipment. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-882D (2000) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equipment. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD-38130 (1963) Safety Engineering of Systems and Associated Sub-Systems and Equip- ment. DoD, Washington, DC Misra KB, Sharma U (1991) An efficient al gorithm to solve i nte ger programming problems ari sing in system reliability design. IEEE Tra ns Reliability 40:81–91 Nakagawa Y, Miyazaki S (1981) Surrogat e constr aints algorithm for reliability optimization prob- lems with two constraints. IEEE Trans Reliability R-30:175–180 NASA 1359 (1994) System engineering toolbox for design-oriented engineers. National Aeronau- tics and Space Administration (NASA), Huntsville, AL NASA DHB-S-00 ( 1999) System safety handbook. National Aeronautics and Space Administra- tion (N ASA), Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA NeuroDimension (2001) NeuroSolutions and NeuralExpert. NeuroDimension, Gainsville, FL Nielsen DS, Platz O, Runge B (1975) A cause-consequence chart of a redundant protection system. IEEE Trans Reliability 24(1) NUREG 1150 (1989) Severe accident risks: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants. U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Rep NUREG 1150 NUREG 75/014 (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessm ent of accident risks in US commercial nuclear power plants. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Rep WASH-1400, NUREG 75/014, NTIS NUREG/CF-1401 (1980) Estimates for the binomial failure rate common-cause model. US Nu- clear Regulatory Commission NRC R ep WASH-1400, NUREG/CF-1401 NUREG/CR-0400 (1978) Risk Assessment Review Group Report. US Nuclear Regulatory Com- mission NRC Rep WASH-0400 OECD NEA (1995) Chernobyl ten yea rs on. Nu c lear Energy Institute, Source Book Oksendal B (1985) Stochastic dif f erential equations: an introduction with applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Painton L, Campbell J (1995) Genetic algorithms in optimisation of system reliability. IEEE Trans Reliability 44(2):172–178 Pattison RL, Andrews JD (1999) Genetic algorithms in optimal safety system design. Proc Inst Mech Engrs 213 Part E:187–197 PCEI (1999) Parametric estimating handbook, 2nd edn. Joint Industry/Government Parametric Cost Estimating Initiative (PCEI), Department of Defense, Washington, DC, Defense Contract Audit Agenc y, Special Projects Division, VA Price CJ (1996) Effortless incremental design FMEA. In: Proc Annu Reliability and Maintainabil- ity Symp, IEEE Press, pp 43–47 5.5 Revie w Exercises and References 797 Rasmussen NC (1989) Report to the Congress from the Presidential Commission on Catastrophic Nuclear Accidents. Appendix B. The Nat ure of Severe Nuclear Accidents. MIT Ro 24-205 Rausand M (1999) Supplement SIO3020: safety and reliability engineering event tree analysis. Pap Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim Rausand M (2000) Hazard identification (HAZID). Pap Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian Unive rsity of Science and Technology, Trondheim Ridley LM, Andrews JD (1996) Application of the cause-consequence diagram method to static systems. Pap Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough Uni versity, Loughborough, Leicestershire Roy R, B endall D, Taylor JP, Jones P, Madariaga AP, Crossland J, Hamel J, Taylor IM (1999) Iden- tifying and capturing the qualitative cost drivers within a concurrent engineering environment. Advances in Concurrent Engineering, Technomic, Lancaster , PA, pp 39–50 Rush C, Roy R (2000) Analysis of cost estimating processes used within a concurrent engineering environment throughout a product life cycle. In: Proc 7th Int Conf Concurrent Engineering, University Lyon 1 Schmerr LW, Nugen SM, Forourachi B (1991) Planning robust design experiments using neural networks and Taguchi methods. In: Dagli C, Kumara S, Shin Y (eds) Intelligent engineering systems through artificial neural networks. ASME Press, New York, pp 829–834 Schocken S (1994) Neural networks for decision support: problems and opportunities. Decision Support Systems 11(4):393–414 Siu N (1994) Risk assessment for dynamic systems: an overview. Reliability Eng System Safety 43:43–73 Smith AE, Coit DW (1996) Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Reliability 45(1) Smith AE, Mason AK (1997) Cost estimation predictive modelling: regression versus neural net- work. Eng Econ 42(2):137–162 Smith TC, Smith B (2000) Survival analysis and the appl ication of proportional hazards modelling. Pap 244-26, Statistics, Data Analysis and Data Mining, Center for Deployment, DoD, US Navy, San Die go, CA Smith AE, Tate DM (1993) Genetic optimization using a penalty function. In: Proc 5th Int Conf Genetic Algorithms, pp 499–505 Smithers T, Conkie A, Doheny J, Logan B, Millington K, Tang M (1990) Design as intelligent behaviour: an AI in design research programme. Int J Artificial Intelligence Eng 5 Stuart JR, Norvig P (1995) AI: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Engle wood Clif fs, NJ Suri R, Shimizu M (1989) Design for analysis: a n ew strategy to improve the design process. Res Eng Design 1:105–120 Tang M (1997) A knowledge-based architecture for intelligent design support. Int J Knowledge Eng Rev 12:4 Thompson WA (1988) Point process models with applications to safety and reliability. Chapman and Hall, New York Tillman FA, Hwang CL, Kuo W (1977) Determining component reliability and redundancy for optimum system reliability. IEEE Trans Reliability R-26:162–165 Vaidhyanathan R, Venkatasubramanian V (1996) Experience with an expert system for automated HAZOP analysis. Computers Chem Eng suppl 20:1589–1594 Valluru BR (1995) Neural networks and fuzzy logic. M&T Books, IDG Books Worldwide, Foster City, CA Villemeur A (1991) Reliability, availability, maintainability and safety assessment. Wiley, Chich- ester , NY Wang XY, Yang SA, Veloso E, Lu ML, McGreavy C (1995) Qualitative process modeling—a fuzzy signed directed graph method. Computers Chem Eng 19:735–740 Watson IA (1981) Review of common cause failures. NCSR R27 UKAEA Wierda LS (1991) Linking design, process planning and cost information by feature-based mod- elling. Eng Design 2(1):3–19 798 5 Safety and Risk i n Engineering Design Woodhouse J (1999) Cost/risk optimisation. European MA CRO Project, Woodhouse Partnership Ltd, Newbury, Berkshire Zarefar H, Goulding JR (1992) Neural networks in design of products: a case study. In: Kusiak A (ed) Intelligent design and manufacturing. Wiley, New York, pp 179–201 Appendix A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work Initial Definitive Study Planning and Implementation Fully developand detail the scope and implementationmethodologyofthe definitive study and submit to the owner for approval. Specific deliverables to be submitted as part of this initial phase are to include: • Study scope of work and specific study deliverables list. • Study resourcing plan. • Study schedule. • Study budget. • Study procedures. Feasibility Studies Carry out a number of feasibility studies leading to specific recommendations in order to confirm and validate the optimal plant design and configuration. Studies to be undertaken will include but will not be limited to: • Plant throughput. • Plant location. • Onsite production of additives. • Availability of local supplies of materials. The following requirements are divided into the different engineering disciplines and their relevant activities, such as process engineer ing, control systems engineer- ing, mechanical engineering, civil, structural architectural and environmental engi- neering, and electrical engineering. R.F. Stapelberg, Handbook of Reliability, Availability, 799 Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design, c Spri nger 2009 800 A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work Process Engineering Testwork Review of all testwork completed to date together with a review of the proposed future testwork program. The results of any additional testwork under- taken are also to be incorporated into the design. The contractor is also expected to participate in any additional testwork program undertaken by way of attendance during testing and logging of results to ensure timely and accurate incorporation of data from testwork into the process design. Process design Process engineering deliverables generally issued for detail design: • Process description and block flow diagrams. • Process design criteria. • PFDs for normal, start-up, shutdown & upset conditions. • Heat and material balances for normal, start-up, shutdown and non-steady-state conditions. • Dynamic mass-balance simulation model. • Plant water balance (including tailings & evaporation ponds). • Process and utility P&IDs. • Consumption, waste and emission summary. • Utility summary. • Process/utility integration and optimisation study for normal operation, start-up, shutdown and upset process conditions. • Preliminary Hazop reviews. Plant layout • Dimensional site plan. • Unit plot plans. • General arrangement plans, elevations and sections. Piping • Piping design criteria. • Pipe and valve specifications. • Line and valve lists. • Site plan review for critical and expensive pipe routings, access arrangements and process requirements. • Preliminary MTOs in sufficient detail for estimate purposes. Control Systems Engineering • Control system, operating philosophy & strategy. • Advanced controls—where applicable. • Applicable codes & standards. • DCS specifications. • Instrumentation list. A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work 801 • Inline instrument data sheets. • Control and automatio n plan. • Process package plant control philosophy. • Emergency shutdown philosophy. • Fire and gas detection philosophy. • Plant communications philosophy. • CCTV & UHF radio requirements. • Instrument air and UPS requirements. • Standard installation details. • Specifications for general instruments, control valves and safety systems. • Control room layout. Mechanical Engineering • Mechanical design criteria. • Full equipment list. • Technical specifications. • Technical data sheets. • Reliability and maintainab ility analysis. • Maintenance spares list. Civil, Structural and Architectural Engineering • Civil, structural and architectural design criteria. • Coordination and integration of geotechnical investigations and topographic sur- veys. • Preliminary designs for: – Buildings; descriptions and conceptual designs for any required buildings and structures. – Water supply systems and dams. – Standard steelwork connection details. – Underground drainage: · sanitary. · contaminated storm water. • Roads and site earthworks. • Pipe racks—loads and congestion. • Foundations—design requirements. 802 A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work Electrical Engineering • Electrical design criteria. • Electrical equipment list. • Electrical load list. • Motor list. • Technical specifications and data sheets. • Preliminary design of all facilities downstream of the main power transformers through to main users including all transformers, sub-stations and MCCs. • Voltage selection for high-KW motors. • Emergency power supply requirements. • Plant lighting design. • Preliminary data and communication equipment requirements. • Optimisation study on number and size of generating units. • Power generation control philosophy. • Load cycle strategy for various plant operating modes. • Load sharing study between diesel and steam turbines. • SLDs for each unit. • Overall SLD for total power supply system. • GAs for electrical equipment/sub-stations. • Standard installation drawings. • Standard schematic and termination drawings. • Grounding/earthing system preliminary design. • Cable ladder route layout drawings. • MTOs for estimate purposes. Loss Prevention • Fire protection, and safety equipment requirements review. • Plant layout review—spacing of equipment. • Emergency shutdown plan. • Area classification (schedule and layout drawings). • Design of fire and gas detection systems. • Design of fire protection system. • Spill control/containment strategy. • Noise control. • Ventilation. A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work 803 Environmental and Permitting Liase, interface and support the nominated environmental consultant with the eval- uation and assessment of impacts as required, including: • Ambient air qu ality/source. • Waste water discharge. • Fugitive emissions. • Noise regulations. • Visual impacts. • Product transportation issues. • Permitting/statutory requirements. Mining Liase, interface and support the nominated mining consultant as required on activi- ties that will include as a minimum: • Geotechnical investigations. • Pit optimisations. • Preparation of p it designs and ore reserve statements. • Mine scheduling. • Preparation of waste dump and haul road designs. • Pit permeability investigations. • Determination of materials handling properties. • Preparation of a detailed report. Constructability and Logistics Constructability and logistical study addressing the following: • Identification of delivery routes and lifting/rigging of heavy equipment. • Site access for construction equipment. • Scope for modularisation and offsite assembly. • Strategy for minimising double handling of equipment and different bulk mate- rials. • Strategy for minimising clashes onsite. • Plan for incorporation of locally based contractors as appropriate. . engineer ing, control systems engineer- ing, mechanical engineering, civil, structural architectural and environmental engi- neering, and electrical engineering. R.F. Stapelberg, Handbook of Reliability,. of Reliability, Availability, 799 Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design, c Spri nger 2009 800 A Design Engineer’s Scope of Work Process Engineering Testwork Review of all testwork. DC MIL-HDBK-764 (MI) (1990) System Safety Engineering Design Guide for Army Materiel. DoD, Washington, DC MIL-STD- 882 (1962) Systems Safety Program for System and Associated Sub-System and Equip- ment.