MINISTRY OF JUSTICE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAININGHANOI LAW UNIVERSITY NGUYEN THI VAN ANH 453234 READING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS IN COMPR
Trang 1MINISTRY OF JUSTICE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY
NGUYEN THI VAN ANH
453234
READING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY HANOI
LAW UNIVERSITY ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS IN COMPREHENDING LEGAL
ENGLISH TEXTS
GRADUATION THESIS
Hanoi — 2023
Trang 2MINISTRY OF JUSTICE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HANOI LAW UNIVERSITY
NGUYEN THỊ VAN ANH
453234
READING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY HANOI LAWUNIVERSITY ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS IN
COMPREHENDING LEGAL ENGLISH TEXTS
CHIEN LƯỢC ĐỌC SINH VIÊN NGÀNH NGON NGU ANH
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC LUẬT HÀ NỘI SỬ DUNG DE ĐỌC HIỂU VAN
BẢN TIENG ANH PHÁP LÝ
Major: Legal English
GRADUATION THESIS
SupervisorNhac Thanh Huong, MA
Hanoi - 2023
Trang 3STUDENT DECLARATIONThereby state that I: NGUYEN THỊ VAN ANH - ID 453234 being a candidateJor the degree of Bachelor of Arts accept the requirements of the Universityrelating to the retention and use of the Bachelor's Graduation Paper deposited
in the library
Jn terms of these conditions, I agree that the origin of my paper deposited inthe library should be accessible for the purposes of shidy and research, inaccordance with the normal conaitions established by the librarian for the care,loan or reproduction of the paper
rey a rs) res}Supervisor's confirmation Researcher's signature
Nhac Thanh Huong MA Nguyen Thi Van Anh
Trang 4A comprehensive study would not carried out without any assistance, mygraduation thesis is not an exception Throughout the process of conducting thegraduation thesis, I was provided with a substantial amount of aid, guidance,and encouragement from my teachers, family members, and companions
First and foremost, I would like to extend my utmost gratitude andappreciation to my supervisor, Ms Nhac Thanh Huong, for her invaluableguidance, courteous assistance, and encouragement The thesis would not havebeen satisfactorily completed without her constant monitoring and thoughtful
advice.
Secondly, my gratitude extends to my friends, classmates, and majored students at Hanoi Law University who have wholeheartedlyencouraged and supported me with all of their abilities I am particularlygrateful to all participants for their significant contributions to the datacollection for my research Moreover, my sincere thanks also go to theremainder of my thesis committee for their encouragement, insightfulcomments, and thought-provoking inquiries
English-Last but not least, I would like to would prefer to sincerely thank my familyand close fnend It is unattainable to express enough gratitude towards myparents, who gave me the encouragement I needed throughout this process To
my friend, this would have been a considerably more challenging task withouttheir presence Thank them all for their unwavering support and for reminding
me to keep moving forward
Trang 5ABSTRACTVarious nations promulgate and implement diverse kinds of legal texts
to govern all activities, thus, it is recommended for law students or legalpractitioners to obtain proficiency in legal English, which is an exclusivedomain of the English language pertaining to legal fields Additionally, it isundeniable that reading is one of the important skills in legal Englishacquisition This study examined reading strategies employed by English-majored students to comprehend legal English texts In order to accomplish theaim, the research utilized a mixed-method approach with the participation of
84 legal English major students who are in the courses K45 at Hanoi LawUniversity The findings indicated that students with good reading proficiencyreported significantly greater use of reading strategies compared to those witheither average or poor reading proficiency, both overall and within specificcategories At the level of individual strategies, a total of 20 out of the 35reading strategies examined exhibited significant vanations in relation to thestudents' levels of reading proficiency Furthermore, students with differentlevels of proficiency demonstrated distinct inclinations in the utilization ofindividual reading strategies Such findings are expected to be advantageous toschool administrators, lectures of legal English, students and anyone who isconcemed about the capability of using legal English at work
li
Trang 6TABLE OF CONTENTSSTUDENT DECLARATION
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS isisssisisscssssssrsnassssstsansseiasssnnsarsnsisaananstanannstieed
LIST OF FIGURES/ TABLEG sssssssssssssssessessesssdnessnssscsnesenssscsscessesezses Vili
PART I NTRODUCTION si se 6, hhhhe
1 Rationale for the study
2 Aims ofthest0Uy 2 ¬ 3Research qUEstf0nS.G566 5/677 0 ớt ccio 6, ME cease c0:
F 0900 01 Ãcoacó TƯ“ ẽ 6
5 Significance of the study - - cọ sen 21.1 ree
6 Organization Of the SIM, eseeosssa Mie tad sệPART II DEVELOPMENT
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ::ssscssssssseesseessersnecsseseneeesneeenes1.1 English for Special Purposes(ESP) co.-
12.1 Definition of Legal Engiish § tế i
1.2.2 Features ofiegal English
TED2 AT TONIC 1:1 GS TA
10122.2 Syntactic features
1.3 Reading Strategies for ESP learners co
1.3.1 Definition of Reading Strate Gis o ccecssssosnsescssstesntesessensennsees
1.3.2 Classifications of Reading Comprehension Strategies
ll
il
Trang 7FED US NON OIE oxssrsssoioeisuigosglegg601009:30305sa30000x35cg0mspzarotssairssesS |D322: WRN GV OGAING iN RES NEON
L323: POSPTOOING ywissccssccstscessccsssicsssssaceriisii manne AF,
1.4 Previous studies on reading comprehension strategies of EAP/ESP
1.5 Summary
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY eecsccssssssssssnesssssnecessstesssnseesssecessnseessne 182:1.Pariidpan lo ssn LD3:3: ReseafchdnstrDDMenlsố 7 c ee oa ee LB
2 2 1xzGhesiiônndiresSS SG c ả i sao eee ees LS
332 FGI VI CW res eee cs s ieea Noppectnaeeniine 2D2.3 Procedures of data collecHon
2.3.1 Data fiom qHesfiOiriđires 22522-555sscseesr=r-resse v 2E
2552 DL FROMU EOI VIA SSSS0) c ổ: MMe SOL3:4 Data anllWsis eect ranean tecisiticccistiwstasietssstcutewetetenceedeictn dt 2D
CHAPTER 3 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS - 24
3.1 Demographic information of the respondents
3.1.1 The English-mnajored students’ fequency ofreading legal English
sui
3.1.2 The perspective of students regarding the necessity of reading legalBNBIISh Materials: 6x22 See eS ees ES NOS 353.2 Reading strategies employed by participanfs 263.2.1 The most and the least frequently used sfralegies 36
Trang 83.2.2 Variations in the frequency of overall reading strategy empioyed by
TC ÔN HGÌN boonssnssosgzngnigtiis030170001004857898g800010.431004gE035:ggG0:g01ug0ai8g503a80.g6gãcicusscol OO3.2.3 Variations in frequency of students’ strategy use in the categories 303.3 Variations in the frequency of students’ individual strategy use 3214: 0INNDEEV: se sseesonoooaosssas ere rent: | 3)
CHAPTER 4 RECOMMENDATIONS 37
4:1 Suggestions for studtnts.o7 2 taf Ae cast suse Daan 374.2 Suggestions for lecturers ¬ — #£4.3 Suggestions for the Faculty of Legal Foreign Languages 30
PART TEI CONGEHSION oc oooooiS bon 2 40
1 Summary of the main ñndings
4 Epp cath Onis Fire en eerste Oe on eeSensfeee-aas eD SE h 1U
3 Limitations and suggestions for further research 41
3 lÀ.LimiGNHOHS:O TRE SHIAN-c - -.:c:::ccccci cecooecoacE Go c.á4 41
3.2 SUB ZOSHOMS JOR TnnierisHiip ss  E , 41REFERENCES, cà con besseesittce-csonnscsesoses sand beeieengddecnantetocensasboeenserocnessl IAPPENDICES
APPENDIX I: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES - VIIIAPPENDIX II: IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW XIII
Trang 9LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
EAP English for Academic Purposes
EBP English for business purposes
ELP English for legal purposes
ELT English language teaching
EMP English for medical purposes
EOP English for occupational purposesESCP : English for sociocultural purposes
ESP : English for Specific Purposes
EVP English for vocational purposes
GLOB : Global Reading Strategies
HLU : Hanoi Law University
L2 : Second language
POS : Post-reading strategies
PROB : Problem-solving Strategies
PRS : Pre-reading strategies
SUP : Support reading Strategies
WHS : While-reading strategies
Trang 10LIST OF FIGURES/ TABLESList of figures:
Figure 1 The frequency of reading legal English tezt commun
Figure 2 The respondent’s viewpoint of the importance of: spccidiag se
EHBIISHREHÏS: sca ccssciaesise rere eater serine 35 een dd
Figure 3 Strategies used by reading levels Error! Bookmarknot
defined
List of tables:
Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Likert scale data 22Table 2 Summary of the most frequently used strategies 1.26
Table 3 Summary of the least frequently used strategies P.28
Table 4 Variations in Frequency of Students’ Overall eating —— Use
29Table 5 Overall categories of reading strategies used among students at threelevel of English proñciency cccscsesecrrrerere-.e 3DTable 6 Variations in the frequency of students’ individual strategy use 32
Trang 11PART I INTRODUCTION
1 Rationale for the study
Nowadays, reading is considered a primary approach in academiccontexts In other words, reading is regarded as one of the essential skills forleamers as it provides an avenue for communication, language acquisition, andinteraction Reading can also include several important aspects that worktogether to develop overall literacy As highlighted by Sheorey and Mokhtan(2001), one of the key means to augment students' comprehension levels isthrough the utilization of reading strategies Students who possess readingstrategies have their own ways of interpreting the meaning ofa text they haveread (Yapp, 2021) In the Self-Strategic Regulation (S2R) Model, readers areperceived as strategically selfregulated ones who approach challengingreading tasks and problems by choosing from a repertoire of strategies theybelieve are best compatible with the situation and purpose of their reading(Oxford, 2013)
In the age of integration and globalization, the ability to comprehendlegal documents or texts written in English, such as statutes, codes, precedents,
or contracts, is of great importance, especially among legal practitioners Inorder to grasp the content of the aforementioned reading materials, law students
or individuals specializing in law are advised to acquire legal English, whichis
a specific branch of English in legal fields, commonly used by legalprofessionals In Vietnam, the majority of legal education institutions haveacknowledged legal English asa core subject within their curriculum At HanoiLaw University (HLU), the study of legal English is an obligatory disciplinefor students pursuing majors in intemational trade and business law as well asfor those specializing in legal English Throughout the formal training,
especially in legal English, itis recognized that reading legal English texts with
appropriate strategies is of utmost importance for learners to effectively accessand interpret these types of legal materials
1
Trang 12In the literature, various studies have been conducted to explore reading
strategies in different contexts of English for Specific Purposes (ESP), such as
business (Chen, (2014), Rohaizat, (2021)), engineering (Nalliveettil (2014),
Surendran, (2023)), and medical ( Bitran et al., (2012), Shang, (2018)).However, it is hard to identify research conducted at HLU pertaining to thereading strategies employed by English-majored students when comprehendinglegal texts Recognizing the undeniable role of legal English reading skills as
well as the gaps that exist in both academic practice and previous research,
hence, the researcher decided to carry out this study to clarify different kinds
of reading strategies ESP learners tend to use in legal contexts, as well as toexamine the correlation between their self-assessment of reading proficiencyand the strategies they employ It is hoped that leamers will be able to enhancetheir performance in the domain ofreading comprehension, as well as cultivatethe ability to engage in lifelong learning
2 Aims of the study
The study is undertaken to examine the reading strategies utilized byEnglish-majored students in order to comprehend legal English texts.Furthermore, it seeks to investigate the correlation between reading proficiencyand the utilization of reading strategies among English majors studying at HLU
Trang 134 Scope of the study
The current study focuses on the strategies employed by majored students as well as the correlation between students’ self-evaluationreading proficiency with the strategies they use Therefore, the participantschosen are 90 random students from the legal English department of HLU fromcourse 45, whereas the teachers' strategy in teaching reading comprehension tostudents is beyond the scope of this study
English-5 Significance of the study
Compared with these preceding research papers, this study intenselyconcentrated on the reading strategies employed by English-majored students
at HLU to comprehend legal materials Furthermore, considerable emphasis ispaid to clarifying the relationship between students’ self-evaluation of theirreading proficiency with the strategies they use Additionally, this studycomprises both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies, with thepurpose of examining and providing an in-depth analysis of the subject matter.Regarding the implementation of the results of the present study, instructors,students, materials developers, and lesson planners can benefit from them
6 Organization of the study
The study comprises three major parts: Introduction, Development, and
Conclusion
The Introduction includes the Rationale, Aims, Research questions,
Scope, Significance, and Organization of the study
The Development is segmented into four chapters as follows
Chapter 1: Literature Review lays out the theoretical background knowledgerelated to the explanation of legal English as well as the reading strategies forESP leamers
Chapter 2: Methodology sets out three main parts: participants, research
instruments, and research procedure.
Trang 14Chapter 3: Results and Discussion indicates the analytical findings of the
survey
and meticulous interpretation of the data gathered.
Chapter 4: Recommendations offers several suggestions based on the key
findings of the study
The Conclusion provides a summary of the study, implications of the study,limitations and suggestions for further research
Trang 15PART II.DEVELOPMENTCHAPTER 1.LITERATURE REVIEW1.1 English for Special Purposes (ESP)
English for Specific Purposes (ESP) encompasses the educationalprocess of acquiring and comprehending English as a secondary or non-nativelanguage, with the intention of employing it within a specific field or contextIts primary objective is to address the speci fic needs of particular groups ofleamers pursuing specific professional competencies while enhancing theirproficiency in job-related tasks In the past, the teaching of ESP, during itsinitial stages, was primarily motivated by the necessity to communicate acrosslanguages in fields such as commerce and technology This has temporanlybroadened its scope to include other areas such as English for academicpurposes (EAP), English for occupational purposes (EOP), English forvocational purposes (EVP), English for medical purposes (EMP), English forbusiness purposes (EBP), English for legal purposes (ELP), and English forsociocultural purposes (ESCP) (Canarana et al., 2020) Hutchinson and Watersdefined ESP as a pedagogical approach in which all decisions about contentand method are based on the leamers’ reasons for learning (1987) Alvi et al(2021) asserted that ESP represents a focused and purposeful approach toinstructing the English language In addition, ESP isa movement that seeks toserve the language needs of leamers who require English proficiency tosuccessfully fulfill specific roles (e.g student layer, engineer, nurse, etc.)and who need to acquire content and real-world skills through the medium of
it rather than master the language for its own sake (Richards & Rodgers, 2001)Dudley-Evans and John (1998) undertook the definition of ESP by delineatingsome characteristics of ESP as follows: ESP caters to the specific purposes ofthe leamers, ESP exploits the fundamental methodology and activities of thediscipline in which it is implemented; ESP emphasizes that the language
5
Trang 16corresponds with these activities in terms of grammar, lexis, registration,
comprehension, discourse, and genre.
1.2 Legal English
1.2.1 Definition of Legal English
Legal English, also recognized as English for legal purposes (ELP), isabranch of ESP The term “legal English” refers to “English language education
to enable second language (L2) law professionals to operate in academic andprofessional contexts requiring the use of English” (Northcott, 2009, p.166).Because a significant portion of ESP has focused on the description andanalysis of the target language and language practices, the nature and properties
of legal language provide material for a substantial part of the legal Englishresearch agenda Legal English emphasizes specific types of communication in
a definite context; forinstance, there are words employed only ina legal contextthat laypersons would not use or understand Therefore, the examination oflegal language is approached as “a form of secondary language, encompassing
a specialized use of vocabulary, phrases, and syntax that helps us communicatemore easily with each other” (Ramsfield, 2005, p.145)
Legal English is also deemed to be the linguistic style employed bylawyers and other legal practitioners in the execution of their duties in nativeEnglish-speaking countries as well as intemationally It is often referred to as
“legalese” and is predominantly used in wnitten form, particularly in the context
of drafting legislation and the formulation of legal documents, as well as in thecourse of judicial proceedings (Branch, 2023) Some linguists have designated
legal English as a "sublanguage" of English employed to convey information
pertaining to legal affairs Legal English possesses similarities to, and yetdistinct characteristics from, standard English in various aspects, includingspecific terminologies and linguistic frameworks It is apparent that thepresence of language is a necessary condition for the existence of law
Trang 17Language serves as a mechanism for formalizing legal statutes and regulations.
Moreover, legal principles and procedures can solely be accessed through the
utilization of language Mattila (2006, p.10) stated that “The legal language,
especially legal terminology, sometimes is almost a language museum, legalEnglish clearly demonstrates this”
1.2.2 Features of legal English
1.2.2.1 Lexical features
Archaisms: The first characteristic conceming lexical features refers tothe archaisms According to Hu & Lu, archaism is old English, and it is rare inmodem English daily but often appears in legal contracts (2017, p.279)Veretina-Chiniac (2012, p.53) stated that archaisms are typical examples oflegalisms and lawyerisms belonging to formal style and making the documentconcise and precise, but unfortunately, causing comprehension problems fornon-lawyers In terms of their structures and morphological features, Crystal &Davy (1969, p 207) explained that most of these archaic words, which havecome down from old English, take the form of adverbials to which someprepositions are affixed They provided an instance of archaic words such
as heretofore, therefiom, thereof hereinbefore, thereafter, hereinafter,whatsoever, etc Examples of archaisms given by Veretina-Chinac (2012,p.104) indicate that archaisms can function as parts of speech other thanadverbials: adverb (hereinafter), verb (deraign), noun (surrejoinder), andadjective (aforesaid) Primarily, old words are used in legal English context toavoid repeating names or phrases, for example, “the parties hereto” instead of
“the parties to this contract” (Mykhailova, Lecture 1) Moreover, adverbials
preceding the verbs they qualify foris also a prevalent form ofarchaism in legal
drafting For instance, it is common to have structures like “we hereby statethat ”, “the agreement is herein contained,” etc Although legal practitionershave a tendency to employ archaic words less frequently compared to other
7
Trang 18terminology, many old words can nonetheless be found in many legaldocuments (Veretina, 2012).
Technical terms: According to Hiltunen (1999), technical terms or terms
of art are pure legal terms A typical example is fort Some legal terms arefamiliar to laypersons (e.g., patent share, royalty), while others are only known
to lawyers (e.g., bailment, abatement) Apart from pure legal terms, there are
also common words with uncommon meanings, ¡.e., polysemous lexemes with
specific meanings within legal English, eg, “attachment action,
consideration, execute, party” (Rylance, 1994, p.36) Legal professionals usethese words as technical terms for their purposes in particular circumstancesThey have precise definitions in the domain of legal science, so they areidiosyncratic However, it is imperative to pay special attention when legalmeaning differs from the general meaning (e.g., consideration, redemption,
tender’) or when everyday words are used in apparently peculiar contexts (e.g,
Siwnish, prefer, hold)
On the other hand, technical terms are different from legal jargon; wordsare not precise enough to belong to legal jargon Jargon is a specializedlanguage that enables a professional group to communicate quickly andefficiently In this way, the intemal communication of lawyers is improved, yetthe meanings of terms become obscure for laypersons There are a number of
legal jargon, varying from slang or near-slang (orse case) to almost technically
precise terms (es ipsa loquitur) Nevertheless, the legal jargon has not attained
the level of professional, technical terms Other examples of the jargon areboilerpiate clauses, corporate veil, and bequests (Rylance, 1994)
Foreign words: Legal English encompasses a substantial quantity offoreign terms and phrases, with the preponderance denving from Latin andFrench origins Some of them have a peculiar appearance Foreign wordsoriginating from Latin or French were acquired either through transliteration or
Trang 19direct borrowing The examples of native terms in legal English under theAnglo-Saxon period are bequeath guilt’ manslaughter, murder oath, sheriffswear, theft, ward writ, etc (Haigh, 2004, p 97) However, the quantity offoreign terms developed overwhelmingly Latin introduced the practice ofterms such as versus, pro se, in propria persona caveat emptor obiter dictum,Amicus Curiae, etc Examples of words of Latin origin are egligence adjacent,Frustrating, inferior, legal, quit subscribe, etc The influence of French isshown both in the words of French origin (e.g, appeal, claim complaint) and
in the use of the position ofadjectives which stands behind the nouns modified
in phrases (e.g, attorney general fee simple absolute, state auditor general)(Haigh, 2004)
Synonymy: The incorporation of synonyms is also prevalent within legalEnglish (Huong N T., 2022) Due to French and Latin influence, English
abounds in synonyms At least three lexical sources gave nse to a significant
number of synonyms existing side-by-side What complicates legal drafting isthe existence of several synonyms referring to the same legal concept, like inthe following examples produced by Haigh: Assign — transjer; Breach —violation; Clause — provision — paragraph — article: Contract — agreement;Defeuit — failure: Lessee — tenant; Promise — assurance — undertaking; Void —invalid — ineffective (Haigh, 2004) Furthermore, the most common synonym
pairs named binomials are doublets and triplets wath the conjunction “and.”
Doublets are two synonyms used together, while triplets are three synonymsused together Examples of doublets are act and deed, legal and valid, goodsand chattels, null and void; and examples of triplets are assign, transfer and setover; build, erect, or construct As in legal English, binominals are comprised
of two words with the same conceptual meaning; one of them is redundant and
does little to the meaning itself’ (Gamer, 1989)
Trang 201.2.2.2 Syntactic features
Sentence length: The length and complexity of sentences are LegalEnglish's most obvious syntactic features The phenomenon of a particularsentence structure arises from the historical reality that, in previous times, eachcomponent ofa legal texts was comprised solely ofa solitary sentence LegalEnglish consists of sentences including a great deal of information,repetitiveness, long noun phrases with plenty of modification, peculiar wordorder, prepositional phrases, as well as coordinate and subordinate clauses(Veretina, 2012) Asa result, lawyers are instructed to evaluate sentence length,eliminate extraneous words and sentences, and even delete superfluous wordsand phrases Only words that support the text's arguments add value to the
sentence.
Nominaiization 1s the favored approach in the realm of formal writing,and the practice of legal writing is certainly not an exception to this normNominalization denotes the process of transforming a grammatical declaration(frequently a verb phrase) into a noun phrase For example, fo giveconsideration instead of to consider, to be in contravention instead of tocontravene, to make an application rather than to apply Nominalization is amorphological process that should be avoided because it lengthens and makesthe text static However, eliminating nominalization can be hard becauselawyers do not say fo arbitrate but to go to arbitration because arbitration is alegally recognized procedure and should be regarded as such (Bhatia, 1993)
Jinpersonal styie: Another characteristic of legal English is theapplication of the passive voice and the third person singular Although thepassive voice is inherent in legal language, it is also overused in every aspect
of legal materials Legal drafters naturally imitate it, therefore, laws and courtdecisions generally incorporate a passive verb, especially when an obligation
or condition is imposed They provide the idea that such mules are foolproof
Trang 21since they occur without the intervention of a human agent The exclusion ofthe first and second person singular is prompted by legal specialists’ efforts to
attain the maximum impartiality or to create the appearance that the law is
impartial As a result, the use of the third person singular and plural ispredominant (e.g everybody, nobody, and every person) However, to some
extent, such generalizations are vague and make it obscure to individuals who
do not specialize in law (Veratina, 2012)
1.3 Reading Strategies for ESP learners
1.3.1 Definition of Reading Strategies
According to C Brantmeier (2000), reading strategies are thecomprehension processes that readers use to understand what they read Inother words, reading strategies are conceptualized as conscious and deliberateactivities that readers take to help them acquire, store, retneve information, andconstruct meaning from the text (Yang, 2004) Carrell, Gajuusek, and Wise(1998) posited that strategies are employed purposefully to denote actions thereader selects and manages to accomplish predetermined objectives.McNamara (2007) provided a definition for reading strategies, characterizingthem as actions that, through continuous practice, efficient and effective ways
to help readers understand and remember much more from the text within ashorter duration Different authors have provided varying definitions forreading strategies, however, they collectively share the same viewpointregarding the charactenstics of reading strategies These are deliberate,conscious plans, techniques, and skills for enhancing reading comprehensionand surmounting comprehension failure They are interesting because theydeclare how readers regulate their interactions with written text and how thesetechniques correspond to the comprehension of said text (Carrell et al., 1989)
In this study, reading strategies can be conceptualized as the entirety ofconscious actions made by readers to comprehend and interpret the textual
11
Trang 22content in order to accomplish a reading task or goal, which can be
implemented in various ways, contingent upon the surrounding circumstances
and the individuals involved in the leaming process They are actions that occur
before, while, and after the reading process and will be made apparent whendiscussing the specific strategies related to reading
1.3.2 Classifications of Reading Comprehension Strategies
There are multiple approaches to categonzing reading strategies.
Anderson (1991) classified reading strategies into five categories: supervisingstrategies, support strategies, paraphrasing strategies, strategies for establishingcoherence in the text, and test-taking strategies Meanwhile, Jimenez, Garcia,and Pearson (1996) divided reading strategies into text-initiated, interactive,and reader-initiated strategies The Self-Strategic Regulation (S2R) model wasintroduced by Oxford (2013) as a different classification strategy for reading.The S2R model includes strategies of three majors, mutually reinforcingdimensions: Cognitive strategies, Affective strategies, and Sociocultural-interactive strategies A different classification of reading strategies wasproposed by Shih (1992) and Baker-Gonzalize and Blau (1995) when theysuggested three stages ofreading strategy use: before, while, and after reading
In the same way, Paris et al classified reading strategies into three categoriesbased on when they are used: before, during, and after reading (Paris et al.,1991; Young & Oxford, 1997) Mokhtari and Sheorey (2002) introduced adistinct classification systemand categorized reading strategies into three broadcategories: Global Reading Strategies (GLOB), Problem-solving Strategies(PROB), and Support reading Strategies (SUP) Adams (2008) identified thetypes of reading strategies as follows: skimming, scanning, making predictions,
and questioning.
Reading strategies have been classified in different ways by different
authors However, within the scope of the study, the classification of reading
Trang 23strategies as adopted in Paris's research, namely pre-reading (PRS), reading (WHS) and post-reading (POS) is elaborated.
while-1.3.2.1 Pre-reading
The procedure of analyzing a text or illustrations before reading the text
is referred to as a pre-reading strategy The primary objective of pre-reading
was to enhance leamers' knowledge acquisition in order to optimize their
comprehension and extraction of information from the subsequent readingmaterial This was accomplished by posing pre-reading questions to encouragelearners to meditate and apply their pertinent background to the text, previewcrucial components, and figure out a reading purpose Pre-reading aids in theassimilation of new material that readers will encounter Readers requirereading strategies to assist them in accomplishing reading comprehension bygenerating a portion of their reading vocabulary and establishing a goal for
future reading.
1.3.2.2 While-reading
The while-reading approach is designed to help readers comprehend thewriter's purpose, style, and capacities, as well as to improve knowledge of textstructure, clarify text material, and identify the main idea While-readinginquines may support leamers in comprehending the particulars of the textualcontent The purpose of the while-reading was to facilitate leamers indeveloping their capacity to extract information from reading materials Thepurpose of the while-reading strategy was to assist leamers in establishingelicitation abilities from what they read Leamers had to employ bottom-upmethods to examine words, phrases, and sentences in texts to validate theirreading anticipation and comprehend the text's details
13
Trang 241.3.2.3 Post-reading
After reading something, readers partake in the process They are
activities that aid readers in summarizing, contemplating, or questioning what
they have just read Activities performed after reading help in the development
of reading comprehension abilities as well as the expansion of vocabularyrange The purpose of post-reading was to assist leamers in developing theknowledge obtained from what they acquired It enabled leamers to review orsummarize what they had read in the text and incorporate the textualunderstanding into their personal experiences
1.4 Previous studies on reading comprehension strategies of EAP/ESPmaterials
There are several preceding research involve reading comprehensionstrategies of EAP/ESP materials, typically the following:
Firstly, a study into the topic “Jnvestigation of Academic ReadingStrategies among That Economics Students” was carried out by Prathomwat(2019) The aim of this investigation was to examine the approaches utilized
by university students from Thailand when engaging in academic reading Thestudy consisted ofa group of 140 Thai students who were enrolled in the faculty
of Economics at Kasetsart University, specifically the Sriracha Campus Allparticipants pursuing an economics degree were required to enroll in theTechnical English course, which was deemed mandatory and centers itscurriculum on enhancing academic reading skills In this study, the researcher
used the quantitative method to find out that participants employed affective
strategies most frequently, whereas social strategies were the least used.
Cognitive strategies were implemented the most when stratified by strategy,while social strategies were still used the least Furthermore, this study showedthat students think that summarizing is the most beneficial strategy, but reading
slowly with no focus was thought to be the least useful strategy.
Trang 25The second relevant study was undertaken under the title “ ReadingStrategies used by Undergraduate Medical Students to Comprehend ScientificPublications” by Bitran (2014) This study investigated reading strategies used
by medical students with differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds enrolled
in the second year of a seven-year program at the Pontificia UniversidadCatolica de Chile medical school (PUC-MS) Forty-seven medical students,with an average age of 20+1 years, comprised of 26 females and 21 males, wereselected to participate in this study The specific objective of the study was to
identify the reading comprehension strategies used by medical students to
understand scientific biomedical publications and to study the relationshipamong self-reported proficiency After the analytical process, the researcherfigured out that students with limited proficiency in the English language face
a distinct disadvantage, irrespective of their level ofintelligence Students withthis kind ofacademic performance tend to achieve lower grades in courses thatrequire extensive reading of primary literature In addition, students whoexhibited English deficiency or lacked appropriate reading comprehensionskills were prone to encountering a bad initial experience that may undemminetheir interest in scientific research Reading publications, consequently, becameexhausting and unrewarding This could negatively impact their ability tobecome life-long learners and manage the pace necessary to master scientific
progress in their respective fields.
Another research related to the lectures’ perspective is “The ReadingStrategies Used by Iranian ESP Students to Comprehend Authentic Expository
Texts in English” by Shokrpourin (2012) This study sought to examine the
reading strategy employed by Iranian ESP students when they read authentic
expository texts in English A total of $1 participants from various majors at amedical science university were involved in this research, with their agesranging from 18 to 21 years old It is noteworthy that all the participants werenative Persian speakers and had been studying English for a duration of eight
15
Trang 26years Furthermore, was carried out quantitatively, and the data were collected
by using a questionnaire and then analyzed by descriptive statistics and OneWay ANOVA The present study used the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)
as its research instrument This particular survey categorized reading strategiesinto three distinct groups: global strategies, problem-solving strategies, andsupport strategies The results indicated that the participants possessed amoderate level of awareness regarding reading strategies Among the variousstrategies, support strategies were found to be the most commonly utilized,followed by global strategies and then problem-solving strategies Additionally,
it was observed that Iranian ESP students used the reading strategies differently
according to their academic majors.
Fourthly, the study was conducted by Razak and Amirin 2011 entitled
“A Study on Students’ Perception of Reading Strategies While Comprehending
an Academic Text by UIM Students’ The objective of this study was toascertain the understanding of reading strategies among first-year students atthe University Technology Malaysia, Skudai, as they comprehend academic
texts, as well as to examine the reading strategies employed by students with
varying levels of proficiency The participants in this study consist of first-yearstudents enrolled in the UHB 1412 (English for Academic Communication)course from different faculties at UTM for the 2008/2009 academic year,totaling 60 students This research was conducted in a qualitative manner,employing interviews and questionnaires as the primary sources for datacollection The findings of the study indicated that both high and low-proficient
students exhibited similar perceptions regarding their preference for utilizing
reading strategies Additionally, the investigation revealed that students
employed three distinct reading strategies - cognitive, metacognitive, and social
- when comprehending the texts they read However, the results demonstratedthat high-proficiency students utilized all three strategies proposed by the
Trang 27researcher, whereas low-proficiency students predominantly relied on
metacogmitive reading strategies.
Apparently, it can be seen that the majority of studies investigated
reading strategies in different EAP/ESP contexts Nevertheless, it proves to be
challenging to identify the research investigating the reading strategies within
the legal context In addition, there was only a few research aiming at therelationship between reading strategy use and reading proficiency among third-year and fourth-year ESP students, who may have to adopt this skill in theirnear-future intemship and professional workplace Accordingly, this currentresearch is conducted to identify legal English-majored students’ strategies forreading legal materials at Hanoi Law University to fill the aforementionedstudies' gaps
1.5 Summary
To sum up, this chapter has provided a brief overview of key terms
related to the topic of the study, including legal English texts and reading
comprehension strategies, as well as previous studies on the reading strategiesemployed by ESP leamers in different contexts Such knowledge has laid thefoundation for investigating the crucial insights into legal English readingstrategies used by ESP learners in the context of Hanoi Law University,
Vietnam, in the following chapters.
17
Trang 28CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY2.1 Participants
Generally, the anticipated participants of the research were 90 year students selected from the Faculty of Legal Foreign Language of HanoiLaw University from course 45 Nevertheless, the survey gamered aparticipation rate of 84 individuals who actually participated withoverwhelmingly positive responses by means of Google Forms The firstlanguage of all participants is Vietnamese, and their foreign language isEnglish
fourth-Particularly, an explanation for selecting the target group is due to theappropriateness of their academic levels As fourth-year students havecompleted all modules of Legal English, namely Basic Legal English 1, BasicLegai English 2, Advanced Legal English I, Advanced Legal English 2, theirresponses on reading comprehension strategies used to comprehend legalreading materials will be a dependable information source for conducting thisresearch Additionally, through the implementation of the survey, these types
of participants are assumed to gain awareness and knowledge to improve theirreading skills not only in comprehending legal texts but also in their practically
Trang 29to compose a more all-encompassing questionnaire An online survey
questionnaire via Google Form was employed for data collection, including 35
different statements plus assessment scales to clarify the participants’
perspectives on the reading comprehension strategies employed in the process
of comprehending legal texts (see Appendices ) In detail, a five-criteria Likertscale was used in the research, consisting of five descnption categories, namely(1) Strongly disagree, (2) Disagree, (3) Neutral, (4) Agree, and (5) Stronglyagree Furthermore, the strategy components were categorized into three
distinct groups, namely pre-reading strategies, while-reading Strategies, and
post-reading (POS) After that, the researcher executed a pilot study with thecooperation of 25 individuals who willingly participated, with the purpose ofevaluating the dependability of the survey The outcomes of the dummy run
‘were unacceptable, and thus, the researcher had to revise the questionnaire to
reach the acceptable Cronbach’s Alpha value (0.8 > ơ > 0.7)
This data-collecting method was chosen predicated upon its severalbenefits First of all, it is easier for researchers to clanfy and analyze thecollected data through the survey logically, as the conclusion for everyrespondent would be drawn up on the basis of average answers Additionally,the process of gathering answers from students can be more time-saving and
convenient via a survey questionnaire Last but not least, by means of
this method, the online questionnaire responses are automatically incorporated
into databases or other software packages, reducing the error of human mistakeand enabling automatic data verification
In contrast, this data collection instrument also has certain limitations.
The restriction conceming the accuracy of the responses is a notable
disadvantage of employing the questionnaire method The presentation of aworded question to respondents, rather than providing a full explanation inaface-to-face or telephone interaction, can lead to different interpretations or
19
Trang 30even skewed results of the same question Therefore, the answers, to some
extent, cannot be concluded in a complete way.
2.2.2 Interview
Gill (2008) stated that qualitative methodologies, such as interviews, arepostulated to yield a more profound comprehension of societal occurrencesthan what could be derived from exclusively quantitative methodologies, such
as questionnaires Interviews are, therefore, particularly suitable in cases wherethere is limited existing knowledge regarding the study phenomenon or whenin-depth understanding is needed from individual participants Understandingthe drawbacks of a survey questionnaire method, a semi-structured interviewwas conducted Within this kind of interview, specific core questionsestablished beforehand to allow the interviewer to delve into comprehensiveinformation
The purpose of the interviews, firstly, is to validate the collected data; inparticular, if the interview results match those obtained from the questionnaire,the dependability of the findings will be guaranteed Secondly, via theinterviews, students’ perceptions of reading comprehension strategies weredeeply analyzed as they could directly share their feelings, beliefs, andexperiences related to this particular matter
In this study, five questions related to different kinds of reading strategiesESP leamers tend to use in legal contexts as well as the correlation betweentheir self-assessment of their reading proficiency and the strategies they usewere posed to five interviewees (for detailed interview questions, seeAppendix 2)
Trang 312.3 Procedures of data collection
2.3.1 Data from questionnaires
Having prepared the questionnaires properly, the researcher contactedthe representatives of classes 4531 and 4532 of Faculty of Legal ForeignLanguage (K45) to ask for their agreement to participate in the survey andensure the clanty and authority of the research Students in such classesexpressed their consent to participate in the study The survey was carried out
from 3# October 2023 to 17" October 2023 by sending out a Google Form link
via Messenger messages to participants from the Faculty of Legal ForeignLanguage of Hanoi Law University The respondents were requested to fill andreturn the questionnaire in a two-week period, which is appropriate for them toconsider carefully before replying In the survey form, there was contactinformation of the researcher that participants are welcome to contact if theyhave any questions The data was then collected and coded for the data
treatment.
2.3.2 Data from interview
First of all, the list of interview questions was sent to the researchsupervisor to ensure that all the questions were concise, rational, critical, andeffective Then, the researcher contacted 10 students with noticeable answers
to confirm their agreement to take part in the interviews However, only 05 of
them agreed to participate.
Each interview took about 10 to 12 minutes via either Microsoft team orface-to-face meeting It should be noted that each interview was conducted inthe student's mother tongue (Vietnamese) to ensure the accuracy of eachanswer as well as create favorable conditions for these students to show theiropinions All the interviews were audio-recorded to ensure the authenticity ofthe answers The researcher started every interview by briefly informing thestudent of the purpose of this research and generally requested the interviewee
21
Trang 32to be sincere, truthful, and forthcoming throughout the whole process in orderfor optimal achievement To create an open atmosphere from the extemal
context, the researcher kept the degree of formality to the least to help the
interviewees feel comfortable throughout the interview
2.4 Data analysis
In the first place, the survey questionnaire's quantitative data underwentanalysis with the aid of SPSS software version 28.0.0 In particular, theapplication of frequency and descriptive statistics was utilized in order toascertain the reading aproaches utilized by senior English-majored in theircomprehension of legal English reading materials The item with the highestfrequency and percentage shows the most important and mandatory responses
to the research questions To ensure the data from the questionnaire survey beanalyzed accurately, the proportion of received - responses was calculatedthrough Microsoft Office Excel to demonstrate the respondents' viewpoints onthis research matter in form of bar charts and tables Furthermore, theresearcher implemented three primary approaches: Mean Range, and StandardDeviation (SD) The mean value of each item can be elucidated with LikertScales as follows:
QuantitativeLimits of Description Interpretation
1 1.0-1.79 Strongly disagree Very low
2 1.8 -2.59 Disagree Low
3 eutral
4 High
5 42-50 Strongly agree Very high
Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Likert scale data
In the second place, the qualitative data of the in-depth intermew was
examined to support the researcher in interpreting and explaining the result
Trang 33obtained from the questionnaire B efore commencing the analysis process, theaudio files of each interviewee were numbered from one to five so as to ensure
their anonymity and then transcribed in wnting Based on the interview
transcription, the researcher carried out a frequency analysis of the results toinvestigate the common tendency amongst participants’ answers to each
question
2.5 Summary
Throughout the chapter, the researcher has provided a complete
explanation of the research design, the data-gathering instruments, the samples
of the study, and the procedures for gathering and analyzing data, which helpsclarify the research methods and effortlessly find out the answers to thequestions of the study Besides, the results from the analysis of both datasets
from questionnaires and interviews were compared and interpreted to check
whether the results supported or contradicted each other The quantitative andqualitative results were described in the discussion