En41 viết tiếng anh 6 Đề số 5

EN41_Viết tiếng anh 6_đề số 5 EN41_Viết tiếng anh 6_đề số 5 EN41_Viết tiếng anh 6_đề số 5 EN41_Viết tiếng anh 6_đề số 5

Full name:

Date of birth:

Group:

Writing topics: Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Part 1: Make a detailed essay outline.

Part 2: Write a contrastive essay of at least 250 words, using your detailed

outline in Part 1

BÀI LÀM PART 1:

I Introduction

Definition of mobile phones and their ubiquitous presence in society

Brief overview of the debate: the pros and cons of allowing mobile phone use in public places

Body paragraph 1:

1 People talking loudly on phones disrupting others

2 Potential for unauthorized recording or photography

3 Protecting personal space in public settings

4 Safety Risks

5 Health concerns related to radiofrequency radiation exposure

6 Privacy Concerns

7 Potential for accidents due to distraction, especially in places like public

transport

8 Instances of loud ringtones disturbing peace

MÔN: Viết – Tiếng Anh 6

Đề số 05

Body paragraph 2:

 Communication Necessity

 Staying connected for work or urgent matters

 Personal Freedom and Rights

 Individual's right to use their property as they see fit

 Mobile phones as a part of modern life and technology integration

 Importance of adapting public spaces to contemporary needs

 Emergencies and the need for immediate communication

 Avoiding unnecessary regulations that infringe on personal liberties

 Technological Integration

Conclusion

 Establishing Guidelines Rather than Banning

 Setting clear rules for mobile phone usage in public places

 Designated areas or times for phone use

 Education and Awareness Campaigns

 Promoting responsible mobile phone use

 Educating the public on etiquette and respect in shared spaces

 Expressing a balanced view on the topic, emphasizing the importance of

considering both individual freedoms and collective well-being

Part 2:

Mobile phones, once a novelty, are now ubiquitous tools in our daily lives As they become more prevalent in public spaces, the debate over their appropriate usage intensifies This essay contrasts the merits and drawbacks of allowing mobile phones

in public venues

Advocates for banning mobile phone use in certain locales emphasize the disruptive nature of these devices In libraries, traditionally quiet havens for study and

reflection, the sudden blare of a ringtone or a loud conversation can shatter

concentration Likewise, on public transportation, passengers often find themselves involuntarily privy to personal conversations, diminishing the communal experience Additionally, the potential for privacy infringement looms large, with concerns about unsolicited photography or recordings In congested environments, the safety

implications, particularly the risks of distraction-induced mishaps, further underscore the need for caution

However, opponents highlight the indispensable role mobile phones play in today's society Beyond mere communication, they serve as lifelines during emergencies, ensuring timely assistance Moreover, personal autonomy remains a pivotal

argument Many believe that individuals should have the prerogative to use their devices as they see fit, with overarching bans viewed as excessive encroachments on personal freedom Furthermore, as society becomes increasingly interconnected, mobile phones represent more than gadgets; they symbolize a modern way of life that public spaces must accommodate

In conclusion, while concerns about the disruptive potential of mobile phones in public settings are valid, their undeniable utility and symbolic importance in

contemporary culture present a counterargument Rather than resorting to blanket bans, a more nuanced approach, perhaps involving designated zones or enhanced etiquette awareness, could offer a balanced solution

aaaaa