INTRODUCTION
Overview of the brand
The management of intangible resources is becoming more essential in today's business environment due to the complexity of the changing markets, fragmented media and distribution channels, growing importance of networks, and focus on the co-creation of value between the organization and its customers Organizational capabilities, skills, and knowledge, as well as brands, are some of the intangible resources that are widely used to differentiate firms (M' Zungu et al., 2010) The term "brand" has become increasingly common, and this issue interests many domestic and international researchers The brand is one of the key elements in developing domestic and international markets for enterprises, advancing commercial civilization, and assisting in the fight against unfair competition Building brands for a business's products and services is crucial because it helps consumers form an impression of the company and its offerings Brand equity is another crucial issue to take into account Brand equity influences the quality of the user experience and improves customers' ability to perceive and process information (Keller 1993) Additionally, brand equity may assist marketers in gaining an advantage over their competitors through the creation of a strong brand (Aaker, 1991) For instance, brand assets accounted for 90% of the $220 million total price Cadbury-Schweppes paid for Procter & Gamble's "Hires" and "Crush" product lines (Kamakura and Russell, 1991; Schlossberg, 1990) Therefore, brand equity is a factor that aids in the survival, sustainable growth, and maintaining the position of businesses in the market.
Overview of technology companies related to transportation
Thanks to the rapid growth of information technology and telecommunications, mobile devices are not simply a common communication and information search tool, but they perform a variety of useful tasks for users, including entertainment, shopping, and education Accordingly, smart service applications on mobile phones are also appearing more and more to meet people's needs for fast and convenient living In particular, the well-known GPS- integrated technology applications, such as the following brands: Uber, Grab, Gojek These service providers are constantly researching, developing, and keeping an eye on diverse types of transportation and services, suitable for many different travel purposes In Vietnam, online
7 booking applications are making a big difference from traditional car services and are loved by most users According to Q&Me (2018), in the technological-based motorbike market in Vietnam,Grab presently holds 60% of the market share, followed by Gojek (19%) and Be (18%) About cars, Grab had a 66% market share for vehicles, "Be" maintained a 22% market share, and the remaining 20% was split among other applications Technological-based motorbike/car services bring convenience and provide multi-services, so more and more people are interested in them In 2021, Vietnam's online motorbike/ car booking market has had a boom with more than 20 different platforms launched, along with 67,000 taxis, 90,000 registered business vehicles, and granted badges (Vu, 2022) Vietnam's online sector for booking cars and motorcycles generated roughly 2.4 billion USD in revenue in 2021, with an average annual growth rate of about 30% to 35% between 2015 and 2021 (Duy, 2021) Not only the motorbike taxi market but also the online food delivery market in Vietnam is being evaluated as having strong growth in recent years
In addition, the introduction of Decree No 10/2020/ND on cutting and simplifying 50% of conditions for business investment in transport services for both taxis and cars (Bao Anh, 2022) Under the contract, Decree 10 is expected to create favorable conditions for a business environment, transparent, healthy, and equal competition among entities engaged in the transport business, bringing many benefits to people and enterprises In this study, the research subject chosen by the author is Grab- a technology company that provides transportation, delivery, and digital payment services.
Overview of the Grab company
The Singapore-based technology business Grab Holdings Inc., also known as Grab, offers delivery, transportation, and digital payment services in Singapore as well as other Southeast Asian nations Over the years, Grab has expanded its reach across Southeast Asia, providing delivery, transportation, financial services, business support, and more - all integrated within the platform as a super app (Grab, 2022) These services help connect diverse users, deliver exciting experiences, and meet the daily needs of millions of people across 480 cities and 8 countries
In February 2014, Grab made its first appearance in the Vietnamese market with a connection service for taxicabs After that, the platform continues to launch the GrabBike 2- wheeler service to fit Vietnamese people's lifestyles Currently, besides the two traditional services, GrabBike and GrabCar, Grab has expanded to many other services such as delivery (GrabExpress), food delivery (GrabFood), and grocery shopping (GrabMart) The application now owns more than 200,000 driver partners, operating across 46 major cities and provinces in the country (Vietnamfinance, 2022)
Currently, Grab brand is facing intense rivalry between businesses on the Internet, not only for service costs but also for quality and service diversification Therefore, creating a strong brand is not enough for the business; it is required to understand what consumers think and feel about the Grab brand, how Grab stands out from other brands in the market, and how they perceptions the value of Grab's services This highlights the importance of building a solid basis that may encourage a favorable perception of a brand
This research emphasizes the customer-based brand equity of the Grab company since it recognizes the value of customers to a company's brand equity In this study, the author will concentrate on studies of variables influencing customer-based brand equity In addition to examining how consumers perceive Grab's brand equity, the study also makes recommendations for how Grab can strengthen its customer-based brand equity
1 To study factors affecting customer-based brand equity
2 To understand consumers' perception of the brand equity of Grab company
3 To provide suggestions and recommendations to improve customer-based brand equity for the Grab company
The study will benefit three distinct sectors:
The literature: This study aims to determine how customer-based brand equity affects the business As a result, the literature knowledge will be beneficial for other researchers
The industry: The study's findings may help managers and other organizational decision- makers better grasp the problems with customer-based brand equity and develop effective strategies
The company: By improving customer-based brand equity, the company could increase customer loyalty, improve brand image, and the ability to charge a premium price for products or services Besides, building a strong brand that resonates with customers, companies can create a competitive advantage and develop long-term relationships with their customers
There are five chapters in this study First, chapter one starts off with a summary of the thesis and the motivations for the research, including the research context Next, the study's contribution is described along with the research objectives
Following the literature review, chapter two synthesizes the theories of customer-based brand equity Accordingly, supporting them with commentary and critical analysis through in- depth research on the fundamental ideas, definitions, and components of customer-based brand equity
The methodology of empirical research is covered in Chapter 3, where the research philosophy and strategy are first introduced The research methodology, validity, reliability, and triangulation are also presented after that Chapter three will be finished with the Research Ethics
The findings from the quantitative survey will be reported in chapter four, along with a critical analysis to address the research objectives and questions
The conclusion of chapter five will include a summary of all the important research findings Along with recommendations for future studies, the study's limitations are also presented.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Definition of brand
One of the company's most significant intangible assets is its brand According to Philip Kortler (1995), “A brand is a name, slogan, sign, symbol, design, or combination of these features used to identify a seller's good or service and set it apart from those of rivals” On the other hand, a trademark is a non-physical asset with a value that cannot be properly identified until it becomes the subject of a specific economic transaction, according to Nandan (2005) Aaker et al., (1991) further noted that brand has been widely regarded as a significant element in consumer choice, acting as a tool for consumers to evaluate the differences and uniqueness of the products Businesses regularly use marketing tools like slogans, logos, and other well- known marks that they own to promote and market their products and services These resources work together to create a brand identity that sets the company apart from its competitors
The brand can aid the business in communicating its message and might stir up feelings in its clientele Customers have distinctive ties with businesses, enabling those companies to profit from their loyalty Companies also depend on these clients to assist in attracting new clients, this promotes the credibility and confidence of businesses Additionally, the brand makes the company's new products accessible to customers Customers that are brand loyal are more willing to spend money when new products are introduced, even if they are more expensive, because they have developed a deep relationship and trust with the brands For instance, because of intense brand loyalty, Apple's loyal clients are willing to ignore the high cost of an iMac, MacBook, iPad, or iPhone When the company launches new devices, many of the company's existing consumers are willing to replace their current ones.
Definition of Brand Equity
There are numerous definitions of brand equity in use today According to Faircloth (2001), brand equity is “the intrinsic value that a brand brings to a product” While Keller (1993) discovered the various impacts that the brand has on how customers react to its marketing programs, is known as brand equity This is founded on the theory that consumer perceptions of a particular brand over time are influenced by what they have seen, heard, read, and felt about it Aaker (1991) is most accurate when defining brand equity as “the collection of assets and liabilities associated with a brand, its name and logo that increase or decrease the value of
11 the services or goods offered by the company” Brand equity has been defined and assessed in a variety of ways depending on how the brand is viewed Accordingly, brand equity can be divided into two large groups: financial-based brand equity and perceived brand equity
Previous studies about brand equity were more emphasized financial-based indicators such as cash flows, cost savings, sales, and prices (Kamakura and Russell, 1993) However, Swait et al., (1993) and Kim et al., (2003) have proven that successfully branded products outperform unbranded products in terms of consumer perceptions and long-term competitive advantage due to price premiums (actual prices), higher market shares, shareholder values, cash flows, as well as price elasticities As a result, signals based on impressions from the perspectives of customers, and workers started to gain prominence in the 1990s.
Definition of Customer-based Brand Equity
The theoretical basis for the customer-based brand equity framework was laid down by Aaker (1992) and Keller (1993), who defined customer-based brand equity as a group structure consisting of different emotional, cognitive, and image responses that customers have as a result of a company's branding activities In other words, a brand's strength depends on consumers' thoughts and feelings In agreement, Konecnik (2007) stressed that the difficulty for businesses in building customer-based brand equity is ensuring buyers have the right kinds of perceptions of goods and services and the marketing campaigns which encourage them in order for the desired feelings, thoughts, images, beliefs, perceptions, and experiences to be connected to the brand
In short, brand equity is customer understanding of the brand, which refers to what they have been taught, experienced, seen, and told about the brand Because of this, consumer reactions to various goods and services from various brands vary In ultimately, these varied reactions add up to brand equity, which is reflected in attitudes, references, and actions related to all facets of brand marketing, such as, for instance, brand selection, remembering advertising copy, responding to sales promotions, and assessing suggested brand extensions For instance, General Electric (GE) and Hitachi once shared ownership of a facility in England that produced identical televisions for the two businesses The brand name on the screen was the sole
12 distinction However, the Hitachi televisions were $75 more expensive than the GE televisions when they were sold Furthermore, despite charging more, Hitachi sold twice as many sets as
GE In this instance, brand awareness has changed consumers' opinions about the merchandise This demonstrates how consumers' opinions of a product's performance are strongly influenced by their perceptions of the brand that represents it
When customers respond positively to the product and the way it is presented, a brand has strong customer-based brand equity (Kamakura et al., 1993) One well-known example of a business with favorable equity is Apple, which has some of the greatest customer-based brand equity in the entire globe Before extending the brand to iPhones, the corporation established an excellent standing with Mac computers, which fulfilled the brand promise anticipated by Apple's computer customers As a result, customers can be less sensitive to price raises and the termination of advertising support Additionally, they might be more receptive to a new brand extension for strong customer-based brand equity organizations, and more interested to look for the organization in a new distribution channel Conversely, if people respond less favorably to a brand's marketing initiatives than they do to a product with no name or a fictitious name, the brand has poor customer-based brand equity (Lassar et al., 1995).
Factor of Customer-based Brand Equity
Keller (1993) asserts that "customer-based brand equity is the primary factor that impacts brand equity and consists of the two aspects of brand awareness and brand image" While Aaker (1991) presented a more thorough customer-based brand equity model that incorporates all five factors that affect an organization's brand equity including brand awareness, brand image, perceived quality, brand loyalty, and other properties assets Aaker's paradigm of customer-based brand equity serves as the foundation for this study However, to establish a measurement scale, Yoo and Donthu (2001) operationalized Aaker's (1991) CBBE model by using four of the five brand equity components The fifth component of brand equity- other property assets, was considered unimportant by Washburn & Plank (2002) for their consumer-oriented measurement strategy Thus, in the following parts of this study, the four dimensions are briefly covered
Figure 2.1 The Customer-based Brand Equity Model (Aaker 1991)
According to Aaker (1991), brand awareness is “a customer's ability to recognize or recall that a brand is a member of a specific good or service category” While Keller (1993) asserts that "customer-based brand equity occurs when the consumer is aware of the brand and has some positive, strong, and distinctive brand associations in memory" In short, brand awareness is the ability of consumers to recall, recognize, and distinguish one brand from others Regarding the awareness component, there are various practices Some researchers (Washburn et al., 2000; Yoo and Donthu, 2001) combined awareness with associations However, the practice of mixing brand awareness with associations risks the separation of these elements, which when operationalized correctly, are distinct from one another Washburn and Plank (2002) identified the necessity to segregate them in follow-up studies in order to improve results and match the theory Another group of researchers
(Boo et al., 2009; Tasci et al., 2007) favored familiarity over awareness For instance, Tasci and Guillet (2011) found that brand familiarity is an important element in consumers' assessments of the fit and compatibility of brands They utilized familiarity to measure different levels of brand awareness In addition, several researchers (Horng et al., 2012;
Tasci, 2011) included both awareness and familiarity in their conceptualizations of brand equity However, given the natural connection between awareness and familiarity, this could result in redundancy, particularly in complicated model testing Additionally, even
14 though other researchers named the component awareness, they still used "familiarity" in their scale items (Wang and Finn, 2013) For instance, Yoo’s (2001) awareness dimensions include "this brand is very familiar to me" and "the characteristics of this brand are unfamiliar to me" In addition, some of the researchers referred to familiarity in explanations of the function of awareness For instance, Lee and Back (2008) identified familiarity as “the incremental levels of awareness that result in brand satisfaction through brand familiarity”
Nowadays, businesses are now making use of effective marketing communication channels including television, mobile, and online advertising to raise brand awareness These distribution channels offer assurance of product legality and quality, which reduces the risk involved in product evaluation and selection when making a purchase (Huang and Sarigollu, 2011)
From the above theories, hypothesis H1 has proposed: Brand awareness has a positive effect on overall brand equity in the Grab company
In recent years, since brands are seen as a means of overcoming the difficulty of establishing lasting relationships with clients in business-to-business marketplaces, brand loyalty has received attention (Mudambi, 2002)
Consumers' attachment to a brand is measured by brand loyalty, which also indicates how likely they are to switch to another brand in the same category if their circumstances change or the product's price, quality, or features change (Aaker, 1991) Brand loyalty results in marketing benefits as consumers who are loyal to a brand continue to buy products from this brand because they believe it provides them with higher levels of satisfaction than the competition This decreases the brand's susceptibility to competitive action (Nam et al., 2011) Both consumers and businesses can benefit from brand loyalty Brand loyalty can result in comfort and familiarity for customers while also generating repeat business and higher profits for businesses
Various implementations and explanations for brand loyalty are used in various studies While some studies look at attitudinal loyalty, others focus on behavioral loyalty when measuring buying frequency and share of category standards (Romaniuk et al., 2013) Attitudinal loyalty was defined by Romaniuk et al., (2013) as a commitment that results in a preference for or attraction to the brand The best ability to motivate customers and inspire a purchasing decision is demonstrated by this kind of loyalty (Samita et al., 2015) For instance, despite the fact that a cup of coffee at Starbucks can cost up to four times as much as coffee from a nearby convenience shop or deli, brand love and loyalty attitudinal toward the brand have led people to stand in line outside the store On the other hand, behavioral loyalty describes the form of loyalty in which customers continue to buy goods or services from a particular brand out of habit or convenience, rather than because they have a deep emotional bond with the company (Esmaeilpour, 2015; Lee & Back, 2008) Instead of a strong relationship with the brand, behavioral loyalty can be based on elements like location, pricing, or accessibility For instance, a businessman may frequently book flights with American Airlines because the airline flies to the locations the traveler must frequently visit However, another airline with a cheaper fare or more convenient schedule might convince the traveler to switch to that company Similar to this, there will be certain customers who make repeat purchases solely to take advantage of the rewards offered by the company program Customers who don't care about brands or quality will therefore purchase anything based just on pricing
Overall, behavioral and attitudinal loyalty are effective strategies for businesses to keep clients, but it's essential for them to also concentrate on developing emotional loyalty by offering superior goods and services and cultivating a strong brand identity (Russell-Bennett et al., 2007)
From the above theories, hypothesis H2 is proposed: Brand Loyalty has a positive effect on overall brand equity in the Grab company
According to Aaker (1991), perceived quality is the opinion that customers have regarding the value and superiority of a good or service when compared to their competitors
Since perceived quality is determined by customer reviews, which vary depending on the needs and preferences of each customer, it is impossible to evaluate perceived quality objectively (Keller, 1993)
Quality perception is a process in which consumers select the quality signals of the product According to Ophuis et al., (1995), “products are assumed to be made up of a variety of signals (such as price, brand name, flavor, packaging, color, etc.), each of which can be used to anticipate the features of the product” Steenkamp et al., (1990) proposed that product cues have a polarized nature Some cues, according to their argument, are related to the product (internal cues), while others have external characteristics Steenkamp et al., (1990) defined internal cues as product features that "cannot be changed or experimentally controlled without changing the physical characteristics of it", whereas external cues are defined as products- related cues that are distinct from the actual product External cues may be more important to consumers than internal ones when they are operating with little understanding of the internal product attributes or lack the time to evaluate the internal cues (Zeithaml et al., 1988) In actuality, consumers find it challenging to assess internal indicators of quality However, various articles (Hatch and Roberts, 1985; Bhuian, 1997) have examined which type of cue is more crucial for consumers to perceive quality They have demonstrated that in several product categories, internal cues are more effective drivers of quality judgment and have higher predictive value than external cues Hatch and Roberts (1985) discovered that consumers relied more on product information (internal cues) to judge a product's quality than they did on price and warranty/certification seals (external signals) Internal cues are typically given a greater significance until consumers judge internal cues to be insufficiently predictive or when they lose confidence in their capacity to evaluate and assess those cues (Agrawal and Kamakura, 1999) Actually, businesses have used internal cues extensively to differentiate their products for their utilitarian uses by focusing on market segments that place a high value on specific cues Ophuis et al., (1995) examined consumers' preferences for private labels of orange juice by comparing intrinsic and extrinsic cues to existing national brands in recent research They made it clear that external cues only play a small part in how consumers perceive quality variation and that internal cues are primarily responsible Four primary external cues—price, brand name, retailer
17 reputation, and level of advertising—were regularly linked to perceptions of quality and value, and many other external signals were also helpful to customers (Zeithaml, 1988; Dodds et al., 1991) For instance, a number of research (Dodds et al., 1991; Vửlckner., 2007) have proven the significance of price in quality inference When it comes to products and services for which precise information is difficult to obtain, the phrase "you get what you pay for" is especially important Instead of a price premium, the consumer might receive a better value at a lower cost (Aaker et al., 1993) Despite having little impact on product quality, extrinsic cues have been found to significantly affect consumers' perceptions of product performance and quality (Veale and Quester, 2009) These extrinsic cues include things like cost, brand, retail location, and nation of origin
From the above theories, hypothesis H3 has been proposed: Perceived quality has a positive effect on overall brand equity in the Grab company
The brand image is defined by Faircloth (2001) as “the consumer's perceptions of a firm as expressed by the brand associations they have in their minds” Besides, brand image, according to Aaker., (1991), is "the understanding consumers obtain from the total set of brand-specific operations engaged by the firm" Based on all of the definitions listed above, a brand image is the impression of the brand that consumers have created Consumers give an image to a brand depending on their subjective assessments of a group of associations they have with it For instance, in the consumer's perception, Lexus is associated with luxury and status, while Volvo might be associated with safety Children may relate McDonald's to a place where they can have fun, or they may associate the fast food giant with a symbol like the Golden Arches
The three components of brand image are attributes, benefits, and attitudes, according to Keller (1993) There are two types of attributes: specific and abstract Size, color, and weight are specific features, whereas "brand personality" qualities like "youthful," "durable," and
"rugged" are more abstract According to Keller (1993), a’ttributes can also be divided into those that are related to products and those that are not Product-related characteristics would
18 be specific to the kind of product or service, whereas non-product-related characteristics would include packaging, user imagery, and usage imagery Benefits refer to how the consumer feels that their demands are being met Functional, experiential, and symbolic are the three categories of fundamental customer demands that Faircloth (2001) articulated Rangaswamy (1993) alludes to this classification when he categorizes goods into three groups based on the issues they resolve: goods that meet practical needs, goods that are primarily hedonistic, and goods that fall into a third group that has considerable symbolic significance Attitudes make up the third element of brand image According to Bird (1970), an attitude is an accumulated propensity to act in a consistently favorable or negative way toward a certain object Brand attitudes are the aggregate judgments of consumers toward a brand According to the tri- component attitude framework proposed by Rangaswamy (1993), attitudes are composed of cognitive, affective, and conative components The conative component describes the likelihood or propensity of the consumer to engage in a particular behavior (such as making a purchase) in relation to a brand The consumer's knowledge or beliefs about the brand are referred to as the cognitive component Emotions and sentiments are related to the affective component
This study puts out hypothesis H4, which states that brand image has a favorable impact on overall customer-based brand equity in the Grab company
METHODOLOGY
Research philosophy
One of the concepts that a researcher must comprehend and be able to employ in their research is research philosophy Research philosophy can assist the researcher in three ways: (i) clarifying the research design; (ii) identifying which designs will be effective and which won't; and (iii) developing a research design that is relevant to the study topic
Epistemology, ontology, and axiology are the three primary methods used in management research (Saunders et al.,2015) Epistemology which is dominates management research, consisting of positivism, interpretivism, and realism (Tsang, 2014) Epistemologies will influence how researchers approach data analysis, select methods, and see potential research areas The
20 parts that follow include descriptions of the key relevant research paradigms, such as positivism, realism, and interpretivism
According to Bryman (2007), positivism is a philosophical approach that can help a researcher perform objective research on social phenomena The objective of the study, according to positivism, is to verify or disprove a hypothesis using statistical analysis, the methodology of science, and the generalizability of the findings (Clark, 1998) The basic objective of positivism is to establish causal or explanatory connections that finally result in the control and prediction of the relevant phenomenon (Crossan, 2003)
The strength of the positivist philosophy, according to Clark (1998), is that it may cover a broad range of situations when examining big samples It might be quick and affordable However, some of its shortcomings include inflexibility, ineffective knowledge acquisition, and difficulty in theory generation (Bryman, 2007)
Based on theories and models of customer-based brand equity, the author makes several assumptions on customer-based brand equity in the Grab company in Ho Chi Minh City The author intends to test these hypotheses by gathering and examining data to show whether they are true or false
As opposed to positivism, interpretivism is an academic theory developed to comprehend and evaluate social and human reality The idea that the social world is too complex to comprehend gives rise to interpretive techniques of research, which emphasize the importance of studying individuals and their social behavior (Bell et al., 2018) According to interpretivism, our understanding of reality is a social construction made by researchers and other humanitarian actors and is, therefore, subjective Instead of focusing on statistical and objective approaches to dealing with complex situations, the interpretivism philosophy creates knowledge by emphasizing descriptive and subjective ways (Remenyi et al., 2005)
A study approach based on the interpretivism philosophy acknowledges the distinctions between natural occurrences and the subject meanings of social interaction (Bryman and Bell, 2007) The strength of the interpretivism ideology is that it offers the potential for altering procedures, addressing problems, and producing new theories This theory, however, has linkages to qualitative research and can often be confusing and unreliable
To evaluate customer-based brand equity in the Grab corporation, the author plans to combine two research theories- Positivism and Interpretivism Both ideologies help to comprehend and explain the essential aims, also complementary research is conducted using
Similar to positivism, realism is a scientific method for establishing the values of knowledge through the collection of facts using both qualitative and quantitative methods as well as empirical assessments (Bryman, 2007) According to Saunders et al (2015), categorizing realism into direct realism and critical realism makes it more understandable The first is direct realism, which believes that reality can be comprehended when employing the right approach On the other hand, critical realism contends that people's perceptions of their experiences, sensations, and images of the outside world are not always accurate and may confuse them (Novikov and Novikov, 2013) Direct realism is shown to be unchangeable, but critical realism contends that things are continually changing and that what people see is merely a small portion of the whole
Each type of realism has a unique capacity to change how researchers perceive their study difficulties Many researchers assert that critical realism is more frequently employed than direct realism since it allows for the complete and more accurate collection and analysis of data for the study's difficulties (Blumberg et al., 2008; Saunders et al., 2015) In studies of business and management, all research methodologies are crucial To select the most effective research methods, it is important to thorough understanding of each research method, including how it operates and its advantages (Bryman, 2007).
Research approach
The deductive approach and inductive approach are two categories of research methodology
A bottom-up strategy is another name for the inductive method It transitions from the particular to the broad Data collection starts with a set of observations made by the researcher Then, certain patterns or regularities will be developed when enough data has been gathered Finally, the researcher clarifies the patterns and draws some conclusions The inductive process involves using a qualitative approach and generating explanations and hypotheses based on observations (Gill and Johnson, 2002)
A top-down strategy is another name for a deductive approach It progresses from broad to specific Where a researcher will evaluate a theory related to the research study, generate a hypothesis, gather and analyze data to verify the hypothesis (Jahn, 2011) The researcher reads theories that other researchers have investigated Then, some theories will start to form To determine whether the hypotheses are valuable and appropriate to the setting of the research study, the researcher will employ a method of data collection The creation of ideas or hypotheses, their operationalization, and their testing are the three stages of a deductive process, according to Gallaire et al., (1989) In this study, the author applies an interpretive approach to develop an overview of customer-based brand equity and factors that impact customers' perception of the brand equity of the Grab company.
Research method
Qualitative and quantitative research are the two primary types of research method, which are developed based on the basis of research objectives to clarify the research problem The qualitative technique is an inductive process and does not require a hypothesis, in contrast to the quantitative method, which is a deductive process and connects to theories (Saunders et al., 2015)
The quantitative approach shifts focus from the broad to the narrow This study strategy makes use of statistical data The researcher frequently gathers data from a sizable sample To identify correlations between variables, the gathered data is subsequently converted to numbers and evaluated (Steckler et al., 1992) The cause-and-effect relationship is connected to this logical
23 process This connection demonstrates how strongly the variables are correlated The results aid in testing hypotheses to determine the degree to which they are true There are two types of hypotheses in a quantitative approach: null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses The goal of the researcher's data collection and analysis is to disprove null hypotheses Rejecting a null hypothesis means expressing the possibility that an alternative hypothesis is correct
On the other hand, the qualitative approach shifts focus from the particular to the broad Interviews and observations are used in the data collection process This method is circular and iterative The goal of the study is to identify any patterns or regularities that show up in the observations and interviews The researcher can better comprehend the phenomenon by keeping track of behaviors and actions The researcher can look deeply into the attitudes and viewpoints of the samples Although this approach does not offer statistical data, it can offer a perception of how processes work Bryman (2007) asserts that a qualitative approach enables a researcher to comprehend the difficulties or problems depending on the researcher's interpretation and points of view
The use of quantitative or qualitative methodologies has a variety of benefits and drawbacks The quantitative approach generates quantifiable, accurate data, frequently from a large sample (Bell et al., 2007) Nevertheless, it does not fully analyze the data and removes the event's context The qualitative approach, however, offers more precise details on the attitudes and opinions of the participants This approach is adaptable and can be changed as necessary It is also less expensive because it frequently only calls for a pen and a notebook While this method is reliant on the emotions and individual opinions of participants, one drawback is that it might not produce reliability
To take advantage of the benefits and minimize some of the drawbacks, the author of this study used a variety of quantitative methodologies The author plans to create and use surveys as part of the quantitative strategy to gather data Reliable information should be produced with the assistance of many individuals Accordingly, the factors affecting customers-based brand equity in the Grab company will be analyzed and the data collected will largely be numerical Furthermore, research is done into how consumer-based brand equity may affect the business
Research strategy
In order to create correct and logical results, it is crucial for the researcher to implement a research strategy to analyze primary and secondary data.
The method of collecting primary data entails an organization or individual collecting information from a first-hand source directly Primary data is gathered for specific research purposes For the particular research being conducted, the researcher might choose from a wide range of techniques and methodologies (Roo et al., 1987) Primary data are gathered using a variety of methods and techniques, such as surveys, in-depth interviews, focus groups, case studies, ethnography, action research, and telephone interviews, among others (Bell et al., 2007) In this research, the questionnaire is assessed to be most relevant to fulfill the research objectives that will be used in this study However, primary data collection has several drawbacks, including the potential for being time-consuming and labor-intensive, which may limit its applicability in some circumstances On the other hand, primary data collection allows researchers for more accurate and reliable results because it’s closer to the source Besides, because primary data collecting is closer to the source, it enables researchers to produce results that are more accurate and trustworthy
Secondary data includes both quantitative and qualitative information Previous studies, organizational records, market statistics, and official publications are a few examples of secondary data sources (Clark, 2013) Researchers can profit from using secondary data by preserving time and resources and supplying comparison data (Saunders et al., 2015) However, there are some drawbacks to using this kind of data, such as the fact that it was gathered for a reason unrelated to the study's goals Additionally, secondary data might be outdated, and difficult to access (Bryman and Bell, 2007) As a result, the author has to access trustworthy material that can answer the research questions and provide high-quality information.
Collection data technique
Interviews and questionnaires are frequently used by researchers as a method of data collection
A common technique for gathering information from a wide sample of people is to utilize a questionnaire A questionnaire suggests a method of gathering data in which participants respond to a set of questions (Saunder et al., 2015) A variety of methods, including structured interviews, telephone interviews, and Internet surveys, can be used to deliver the questionnaire This method is evaluated on its capability to build a sizable sample size using the same set of questions used in common and practical procedures Also, the questionnaire must be consistently understood by all respondents, and make sure that the answer choices are adequately aligned with the study questions and objectives (Crossan, 2003) As a result, the questionnaire differs from interview approaches, is frequently standardized, and has few open questions to collect substantial amounts of quantitative data In order to obtain large amounts of quantitative data for this study, a self-completed questionnaire will be used through a web- based application
Due to its advantages in gathering data from a large number of participants and the ability to present the data obtained via the questionnaire approach in numerical terms, the questionnaire method was chosen (Blumberg et al., 2008) In order to answer the research question and meet the study objective, it is essential that the questionnaire's design is effective and ensures the collection of relevant data (Saunders et al., 2015) Online messaging services will be used to send questionnaires in this study This approach was chosen because it is simple to use on many various types of electronic devices, thereby reaching a larger population Online surveys also have the benefit of encouraging more honest responses from respondents due to their secrecy The link will be sent directly by the author to those who frequently utilize Grab services in Ho Chi Minh City The distribution and carrying out of this online survey will take place over a period of one week in March
The questionnaire consists of five parts: Brand Equity, Brand Awareness, Brand Loyalty, Brand Image, and Perceived Quality There, several demographic questions were first asked of the participants The main goal of this of the study, emphasizing the survey's confidentiality and anonymity as well as the respondents' voluntariness is also included in the research questionnaire The questionnaire was to be finished by the participants in no more than 15
26 minutes Before the official study is carried out, a pilot study is undertaken to verify this The questionnaire and information sheet are attached as part of the study's Appendix section
According to Saunder et al., (2015), among primary data collection methods, interviews produced the most accurate results since they relied on in-depth conversations between the interviewer and interviewees In particular, the interview gives the researcher a chance to explain the study environment and the research topic to the respondent and to make sure they understand what they mean There are three distinct interview formats, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured interviews (Bell, 2018) First, structured interviews follow a similar format to the questionnaire approach, asking a set of questions repeatedly to various participants while adhering to a predetermined interview schedule Second, the questions in semi-structured interviews can change depending on the conversational setting The order of the questions is not fixed and can be changed Finally, there is no need to prepare a list of questions in advance for unstructured interviews This interview's objective is to provide the researcher the freedom to inquire about the respondents' areas of interest
However, the author did not use the interview data collection method in this study.
Reliability, Validity, and Triangulation
Reliability is the degree to which data-gathering methods or analysis processes provide trustworthy results, according to Saunders et al., (2015) Reliability can be increased by examining the consistency of results across time, among different observers, and between test components (Clark, 2013) On the other hand, Mohamad (2015) asserted that in several cases, reliability will be threatened The first is the subject or participant error, when they are in different mental states (tired, excited ), the survey results obtained will also be affected by those states Another error may come from the participants' bias toward the surveyed subjects Therefore, for an objective survey, these threats should be addressed
Validity is also an important factor in ensuring research quality Crossan (2003) claims that validity is a tool for evaluating the approaches that will be employed, such as data collecting and analysis, to assess the tool's level of correctness and the relationship between the concepts
27 involved and the research questions Examining how well the findings accord with accepted theories and other measures of the same topic might help to determine whether the research is valid.
Sampling
In order to assess a set of characteristics as a whole, sampling is frequently done (Bell, 2007) The essential need for sampling, according to Saunders et al (2015), is that it should make it easier for the researcher to give an answer to the study's questions In research, two primary types of sampling techniques are widely utilized One type of sample is a probability sample, in which the likelihood of each component of the sampling frame being selected for the sample is equal Non-probability sampling is the second sampling technique, in which the researcher chooses whether or not to include a certain component of the study based on his or her personal assessment of its likelihood The use of evaluation criteria as a non-random foundation for selecting sample elements makes non-probability sampling stand out from other sampling methods (Bryman et al., 2007).
Research Ethics
Following the regulations of research ethics, the author's professional and moral behavior must be suitable for the study's conception, design, and access to subjects or organizations for data collection, analysis, and reporting At the introduction stage, the author will send respondents an information sheet outlining the study's expectations, objectives, confidentiality policy, and data collected for the study Additionally, the data supplied by participants is only utilized for empirical research and not other commercial endeavors The ethical standards of the University of Bolton are the foundation of this study
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
Democraphic
The demographic characteristics of the respondents looked at in the current study included gender, age range, frequency of use of transportation services (such as ride-hailing, car sharing, public transit), frequency of use of food delivery services (such as GrabFood,
BeeFood, BeaminEats), frequency of use of digital payment services (such as GrabPay, GoPay, BeaminPay), and familiarity with the Grab brand
As shown in table 4.2, there are 94 males, 139 females, and 2 others According to the Gender Descriptive Statistics table, men make up 40% of the total respondents, while women make up a significantly greater percentage at 59.1%, and the remaining 0.9% are other respondents Regarding the second demographic factor, age range, it was found that 45.5% of respondents were between the ages of 18 and 25, and 40% were between the ages of 26 and
35 A total of 2.6%, 10.2%, and 1.7% of respondents were under the age of 18, between the ages of 36 and 45, and older than 46, respectively These figures show that young people have a great need for using transportation technology services A description of the age range is shown in the table below:
Another important demographic feature explored in the current study referred to the frequency of use of technology transportation services (e.g., ride-hailing, car sharing, public transit) Figure 4.4 presented the respondents' answers:
Figure 4.1 Frequency of use of transportation services (e.g., ride-hailing, car sharing, public transit)
Figure 4.1 illustrates that 47% of respondents claimed that they use technology transportation services (e.g., ride-hailing, car-sharing, public transit) several times a week The number of respondents who use technology transportation services several times a month was
78 respondents (33%), while those who rarely use technology transportation services were 8% (18 respondents) Only 29 respondents, representing 12%, used technology transportation services on a regular basis There is no respondent who has never used a technology transport service Furthermore, in the current research, the author also discussed how frequently people use food delivery services (see Figure 4.2):
Figure 4.2 The frequency of use of food delivery services
As shown in Figure 4.2, the respondents who use food delivery services several times a week accounted for the largest proportion at 39%, followed by people who used food delivery services almost daily (35%) The proportion of respondents who occasionally uses food delivery services was 19%, and that of respondent who rarely uses food delivery services was 7% There is no respondent who has never used food delivery services Figure 4.3 showed the frequency of use of digital payment services (e.g., GrabPay, GoPay, BeaminPay):
Figure 4.3 The frequency of use of digital payment services (e.g., GrabPay, GoPay, BeaminPay)
Accordingly, the respondents' level of using digital payment services was also examined in the current research Specifically, the respondents who occasionally used digital payment services were 35%, followed by those who have regularly used digital payment services (27%) The percentage of respondents who rarely used digital payment services was 17% and the people who very often used those services was 14% Besides, there were 7% of respondents have never used digital payment services
Figure 4.4 The familiarity level of the Grab company among respondents
Finally, the author identified the familiarity level of the Grab company among respondents The majority of the respondents (46%) reported that they are extremely familiar with the Grab company while the number of people who are very familiar was 90 (38.3%) Besides, 33 respondents (14%) stated that they are moderately familiar with the Grab company, and only 4 respondents (1.7%) affirmed that they are somewhat familiar with the Grab brand Details were shown in Figure 4.4.
Reliability test
Cronbach's alpha coefficients are utilized to assess the scale's reliability The reliability of a factor can be evaluated using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, which can also be used to eliminate observed variables with low reliability from the scale (Devon, 2007) There are two criteria included in the requirement for standard acceptance of variables First, the variables must have a total correlation coefficient of 0.3 or higher (Corrected Item Total Correlation) Second, the variables' Cronbach's Alpha coefficients must be 0.7 or greater The analytical
34 variables are deemed acceptable and appropriate for the analysis of the next steps if 02 or more conditions are met
Results of reliability test were presented in the following table:
As shown in Table 4.4, Cronbach's alpha and Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted is higher than 0.7, and the Corrected Item-Total Correlation is greater than 0.3 This indicates that the items used in the questionnaire were reliable to explore Brand Loyalty factors (BL), Brand Image factor (BI), Brand Awareness (BA), Perceived Quality (PQ), and Customer-based Brand Equity factor (CBE) in the Grab company.
Descriptive statistic
The questionnaire's processed data was used to provide descriptive statistics on several factors (BA, BL, BI, and PQ) that contribute to customer-based brand equity (CBE) The following sections provided more information
Customer-based Brand Equity (CBE):
The CBE of Grab in the current study was examined with three questionnaire items Table 4.5 presented descriptive statistics of the CBE factor
Table 4.5: Descriptive statistics of Customer-based Brand Equity factor
In terms of CBE, the respondents agreed that the brand and services of the Grab company are well established (CBE1: M= 4.07; SD= 0.921), and even if other brands/ services have the same features as Grab, they would prefer to buy this brand (CBE2: M= 3.87; SD 1.086) Thus, it makes sense to use the service of the company Grab instead of any other brand even if they are the same (CBE3: M= 3.89; SD= 1.087)
Brand awareness aspects were recognized as contributing variables to CBE, as suggested in the conceptual framework Five questionnaire items were used to assess brand awareness factors The brand awareness factor results were shown in Table 4.6:
Table 4.6: Descriptive statistics of Brand Awareness factors
Table 4.6 demonstrates that the respondents are in agreement that they can rapidly recall the Grab sign or logo (BA1: M= 4.32; SD= 0.794) Besides, the respondents approved that some characteristics of Grab come to their mind quickly (BA2: M= 4.24; SD= 0.803), even if these characteristics of Grab appeared on social media (BA3: M= 4.27; SD= 0.797) Specifically, the respondents also affirmed that the Grab brand is widely distributed (BA4: M = 4.33; SD 0.763), therefore, they can recognize Grab among other competing brands (BA5: M= 4.36; SD 0.764)
Brand Loyalty (BL) elements were the second component that the current study examined as contributing to CBE To investigate this issue, the author used six questionnaires, and the questionnaire in Table 4.7 possesses the results:
Table 4.7: Descriptive statistics of Brand Loyalty factors
As revealed in Table 4.7, the respondents agreed that they consider the Grab company to be their first choice (BL1: M= 3.94; SD = 0.994), and this company provides them with superior service quality as compared to any other brand (BL2: M= 3.91; SD= 0.987) In particular, the respondents believed that Grab provides more benefits than other companies in its category (BL4: M= 3.86; SD= 1.072), as a result, even if another company is offering a lower rate, they still choose the service at Grab company (BL3: M=3.78; SD= 1.136) The respondents were satisfied with the services of the Grab company (BL5: M=3.99; SD= 0.958), and they intend to continue choosing the services of the Grab company (BL6: M= 3.94; SD= 0.954) In sum, descriptive statistics shown in Table 4.7 indicated that the respondents quite trust and are satisfied with the brand
Brand image characteristics, which were covered by six questionnaire items, were another aspect of customer-based brand equity in the Grab company that was investigated in the current study Table 4.8 used descriptive data to show how respondents felt about various aspects of brand image:
Table 4.8: Descriptive statistics of Brand Image factors
In terms of Brand Image, the respondents acclaimed that the Grab brand is familiar to them (BI1: M= 4.16; SD= 0.842), this company appeared on social media has its own personality (BI2: M=4.00; SD= 0.931), and Grab has a clean image (BI3: M=4.12; SD= 0.841) They also trusted that Grab owns the particular service that appeared on social media (BI4: M= 4.19; SD0.793), a differentiated image in comparison with the other brands (BI5: M= 4.13; SD= 0.819),
39 and there are reasons to use particular services of Grab company over the competing brand (BI6: M= 4.12; SD= 0.851)
Finally, the Perceived Quality will be explored through three questionnaire items
Results collected from these questionnaire items were presented in Table 4.9:
Table 4.9: Descriptive Statistics of Perceived Quality
As shown in Table 4.9, although a part of the respondents does not appreciate the quality of service and the price that Grab provides, the majority of respondents agreed that the quality of services in the Grab company is high (PQ1: M= 3.97; SD= 0.898), and Grab provides customers with reasonable service rates (PQ2: M= 3.91; SD= 0.895) Specifically, the ability of the company Grab to expand its functions and scope of activities in the future is highly appreciated (PQ3: M = 4.11; SD = 0.891).
Regression analysis
To provide a solution to the research question regarding the contribution of several elements to the Customer-based Brand Equity (CBE) of the Grab company in Ho Chi Minh City, including Brand Awareness (BA), Brand Loyalty (BL), Brand Image (BI), and Perceived Quality (PQ) The regression model below was created:
Accordingly, table 4.10 shows the model summary:
Table 4.10 reveals that R Square was computed at 0.763, which means that four factors—BA, BL, BI, and PQ— account for 76.3% of the variance in Customer-based Brand Equity in the Grab organization The Durbin-Watson statistic of 1,610 also demonstrates that there is no association between the residuals The assumption of residual independence is thereby satisfied by the regression model Next, the outcomes of the ANOVA are shown in table 4.11 below:
According to the results provided in Table 4.11, the significance was 000, which is less than 0.05 Therefore, the regression model is consistent with the entire research and may be used to forecast customer-based brand equity as a dependent variable
The regression results are finally shown in Table 4.12:
Based on the results above, it can be concluded that four factors BA, BL, BI, and PQ have a sig value less than 0.05 Thus, regression modeling is a statistically significant result
The following regression equation was created based on the findings in Table 4.12 and it describes how BA, BL, BI, and PQ affect CBE:
According to the research's findings, all independent variable has an impact on the dependent variable The fact that all of the regression coefficients are greater than 0 indicates that all variables, including BA, BL, BI, and PQ, have a favorable effect on the customer-based brand equity of the Grab company in Ho Chi Minh City Thus, the research hypotheses H1, H2, H3, and H4 are accepted as a result of this finding.
Discussion
The current study's objective is to look at the factors that support customer-based brand equity within the Grab company Data was collected from the survey's 235 respondents
BA, BL, BI, and PQ characteristics are the four key categories of variables that affect the degree of CBE, according to survey data This finding has been corroborated by earlier research According to Yoo and Donthu (2000), through the investigation of the relationships between marketing mix components and brand equity, BA, BL, BI, and PQ are four factors that determine CBE The "Young consumers' insights on brand equity" study by Samita et al., (2015) also found that BA, BL, BI, and PQ are the four characteristics that have the biggest impact on brand equity
Among four groups of influencing factors (BA, BL, BI, and PQ), the regression results indicated that PQ had the most influential power on CBE in the Grab company (Beta= 0.286) Such PQ factors include consistency, training of service providers, staff-customer interaction, and physical support of the service system Along the same line, previous studies of CBE also asserted similar findings Gronroos (1984) and Tasci et al., (2020) conducted studies on CBE stating that staff attitude, willingness, ability to serve, and physical and psychological access as factors that lead to increased perceived quality Besides, according to Aaker(1992), in a study of
250 business managers who were asked to identify the sustainable competitive advantage of their firm, the top-rated asset was perceived quality These researchers came to the conclusion that PQ characteristics were the root reasons for a favorable CBE degree
In conclusion, the analysis of the questionnaire data showed that BA, BL, BI, and PQ had a substantial impact on CBE Grab must therefore design and implement relevant methods to strengthen their CBE
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Conclusion
The findings have provided some insight into the variables that significantly affect brand equity among Grab's customers, a topic that is not extensively discussed in the literature in the context of Vietnam The results would assist the Grab Company in developing strategies to increase its brand equity in order to gain a competitive advantage and sustain commercial operations Multiple regression analysis revealed that customer-based brand equity is most strongly influenced by perceived quality The findings of this study support the study of Kayaman (2007) and Sanyal et al (2011) that brand equity is strongly influenced by perceived quality Sanyal et al., (2011) concurred that consumers’ perceived quality can be considered a factor that cannot be easily dominated by marketers, and quality-oriented relevant marketing strategies may allow well-known brands to shape brand image in consumer minds, thus, indirectly affecting brand equity Besides, Konecnik et al., (2007) also asserted that several components of perceived quality have a significant and direct effect on brand equity In addition, Ophuis et al., (1995) highlighted that obtaining a high level of perceived quality is a good strategy for improving company profit
In addition, the Grab company is good at building brand image and increasing awareness among consumers, specifically, a lot of respondents consider that they are familiar with the Grab brand, and acknowledged that Grab has a clear brand image In terms of service quality, the majority of respondents trust that Grab offers consumers a price that is appropriate for the quality of service they provide, concurrently, respondents also believe that the ability of the company Grab to expand its functions and scope of activities in the future is very high In
44 addition, the respondents evaluate that the Grab brand is quite widely distributed in Ho Chi Minh City, so they can recall some features of the Grab brand quickly
On the other hand, when comparing Grab with other companies in the same field (Be, Beamin, Gojek, ) in terms of price, service quality, and overall satisfaction, the percentage of respondents supporting Grab only relatively fluctuations Some respondents believe that the service quality of Grab company is not superior to competitors, thus, they would choose another company if these companies offer a lower price than Grab This directly affects perceived quality and brand loyalty, as well as indirectly affects brand equity This issue has been found in previous studies According to Yoo and Donthu (2000), high-end brands are frequently thought to be of superior quality and less sensitive to price cuts from competitors than low-end brands Thus, improving product quality can help Grab enhance the perceived value and brand loyalty of customers, thereby increasing the company's brand equity In conclusion, Grab needs to improve more to sustainably compete with other brands in Ho Chi Minh City.
Recommendation
The topic would want to provide some ideas to enhance the CBE of Grab in Ho Chi Minh City based on the findings of this study BA, BL, BI, and PQ are some of the elements that have been identified in previous sections of the study as having an impact on Grab's CBE
With the strong development of the economy, many technology companies related to transportation have been formed and developed, followed by fiercer competition in various services among companies These companies must not only find new customers but also have to take measures to maintain relationships with existing customers Therefore, it is imperative that the Grab brand strategically considers about how it can strengthen its brand recognition by, for example, utilizing networking opportunities and planning social events with themes (such as charity events, conferences, etc.) that would match with customers' social identities This will help to create attachment and loyalty between customers and the company Similar to this, a consumer's lifestyle is adaptable and changeable over the span of their life Brand
45 managers should continuously analyze the lifestyles of current and potential customers to understand their needs and interests and to deliver services that are suited for them in order to increase brand equity For instance, the growth of coffee shop companies like Starbucks is influenced by the demand for products that may fit into a busy work schedule Additionally, Nam et al (2011) discovered that self-congruence positively impacts brand loyalty, so Grab brand marketers should look into the personality traits of their brands from the viewpoint of the consumer and develop a brand image that is consistent with the consumer's ideal self- concept In context with this, as consumers choose transportation services beyond meeting their immediate needs, brand personality can be utilized to position the brands in highly competitive environments For instance, if transportation service is discovered to be quick and friendly, marketing campaigns should provide content and advertisements that highlight these qualities Finally, Grab managers need to set up a welcoming environment so they can communicate with customers through customer service call centers or other support channels as needed This improves the consumer experience while also assisting the business in building a solid reputation and brand loyalty
Firstly, brand equity will not automatically rise just because marketers cultivate a favorable brand attitude or evaluation Brand attitude is merely one of the dimensions or factors of brand image, thus, the consumer's opinion of an improper or poorly positioned image cannot be changed by a good brand evaluation Instead, brand managers must promote a good brand attitude as one of the associations that combine to create a brand image Second, when marketers are aware that associations can be used to shape a particular brand image, brand equity is further reinforced Marketers can fine-tune desired perceptions by supplying and communicating precise brand connections For instance, when customers see Nike's recognizable swoosh, they will immediately think of the brand When people hear the phrase
"Just Do It," they will likely first think of Nike In addition, Nike may be one of the first websites customers visit if they need new running or basketball shoes The associations offered in the marketing campaigns shouldn't be created and distributed at random By overwhelming the consumer with brand associations in the hopes that some of them will remain in the
46 customer's mind, marketers are more likely to produce undesirable pictures Marketers should actively manage the consumer perceptions of their brands If the desired image is to be realized, it is crucial that brand image is communicated consistently throughout all communication and marketing activities
Perceived quality is the most influential factor on the brand equity of the Grab company with Beta= 0.286 Accordingly, to improve perceived quality, brand managers should develop marketing strategies based on customers’ perceived quality
First, the Grab brand could reinforce the quality of the service by enhancing Grab's 24/7 Call Center service in order to shorten the response time to all customer inquiries and suggestions In addition, the Grab brand should also promote the Online Support feature in the application, so that customers can quickly find answers to their own questions during service use, or they can send questions immediately to Grab for timely support Second, customer’s' perceptions of a corporate brand are fundamentally formed during customer-brand touch- points due to the inseparable nature of service production and consumption (Calvo- Porral et al., 2017) As a result, managers should pay attention to how their staff members behave on a regular basis and make sure they understand the brand's mission because they will be the ones who engage clients in service interactions and so influence how customers perceive the brand
In order to continue raising the standard of its services, the Grab brand should introduce new programs and training sessions for Driver Partners At the same time, enhancing the map system to precisely update routes, improving trip costs, and lowering detours for Driver Partners
The weakest factor that impacts brand equity is brand awareness with Beta = 0.104 Managers should create and conduct promotional activities to encourage the use of products and services since product purchases and service usage can increase brand awareness (Percy et al., 1992) Initially, managers should use price promotions to raise brand awareness because they encourage brand usage and awareness In particular, price promotions stimulate brand
47 switching and give customers an incentive for trying services they usually might not pay full price for Additionally, research from Dehghani et al (2016) demonstrates that all four aspects of social media advertising—entertainment, customization, information, and irritation—play a significant role in aiding the growth of brand awareness among consumers Thus, it is important for Grab company to increase advertising campaigns on social networking sites, which helps to raise customer awareness of the Grab brand The Wrapped ad from Spotify, for instance, brought consumer data to life Spotify honored its customers and music by utilizing a range of channels, such as diverse social media advertising strategies This not only increased brand recognition but also helped Spotify carve out a space for itself in the music streaming market Finally, the company should maintain sustaining brand awareness Even if their advertising support decreases, well-known businesses can continue to profit from the awareness they have built for a respectable amount of time (Aaker, 1991) Over time, as promotion investment increases, brand awareness may increase as a result of improved service user experience.
Limitations of the topic
Although the research topic has made fundamental contributions in terms of theory and practice However, the author's research ability is still limited, thus, certain limitations cannot be avoided
Firstly, the scope of the study is still narrow, limited to the area of Ho Chi Minh City Thus, it does not fully and accurately reflect the overall factors that affect the customer-based brand equity of the Grab company in Vietnam Secondly, the topic only focuses on studying the factors that directly affect brand equity, not comparing the magnitude of these relationships with each other Another limitation is that the topic has not explicitly classified the target group closely following the age (youth, middle-aged, elderly) of the customer Therefore, it has not been determined which age group knows the Grab brand the most Finally, the results of the regression analysis with adjusted R2 of 0.763 shows that the model explains 76.3% of the change in the customer-based brand equity variable, while the author cannot explain 23.7% of the remaining factors that cause changes in the customer-based brand value variable
[1] Aaker, D.A (1991) Managing Brand Equity New York: The Free Press
[2] Aaker, A D., Batra, R., & Myers, G.J (1992).Advertising management (2nded) New Jersey: Prentice Hall
[3] Agrawal, J., & Kamakura, W A (1999) Country of origin: A competitive advantage? International journal of research in Marketing, 16(4), 255-267 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
[4] Bao Anh (2022) Competition for the ride-hailing market in the new normal period VTCnew [Online] Available at: https://vtc.vn/bai-toan-canh-tranh-cho-thi-truong-goi-xe-cong- nghe-thoi-ky-binh-thuong-moi-ar667071.html Accessed on 18 March, 2023
[5] Boo, S., Busser, J., & Baloglu, S (2009) A model of customer-based brand equity and its application to multiple destinations Tourism management, 30(2), 219-231 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[6] Bhuian, S N (1997) Marketing cues and perceived quality: Perceptions of Saudi consumers toward products of the US, Japan, Germany, Italy, UK and France Journal of Quality management, 2(2), 217-234 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
[7] Bird, M., Channon, C., & Ehrenberg, A S (1970) Brand image and brand usage Journal of
Marketing Research, 7(3), 307-314 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[8] Bryman, A and Bell, E (2007) Business Research Methods 2nd Ed New York: Oxford University Press
[9] Bell, E., Bryman, A., and Harley, B (2018) Business research methods Oxford: Oxford
[10] Blumberg, B., Cooper, D R., and S.Schindler, P (2008) Business Research Methods 2 nd Ed London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education
[11] Bell, E., & Bryman, A (2007) The ethics of management research: an exploratory content analysis British journal of management, 18(1), 63-77 [Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
[12] Bloemer, J M., & Kasper, H D (1995) The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty Journal of economic psychology, 16(2), 311-329 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
[13] Chi (2022) What is Brand Equity? Measuring and managing brand equity Gobrand Available at: https://gobranding.com.vn/brand-equity-quan-tri-tai-san-thuong-hieu/ Accessed on 17 March, 2023
[14] Clark, A M (1998) The qualitative‐quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post‐positivism and reconciliation Journal of advanced nursing, 27(6), 1242-
1249 [Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[15] Crossan, F (2003) Research philosophy: towards an understanding Nurse Researcher
(through 2013), 11(1), 46 [Online] Available at: https://www.proquest.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[16] Clark, G (2013) Secondary data Methods in Human Geography, 57-73 [Online] Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ Accessed on 8 March, 2023
[17] Calvo-Porral, C., & Lévy-Mangin, J P (2017) Store brands’ purchase intention: Examining the role of perceived quality European Research on Management and Business
Economics, 23(2), 90-95 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28
[18] Duy (2021) Technology car-hailing application has changed the habits of Vietnamese users Vietnamnet [Online] Available at: https://vietnamnet.vn/ung-dung-goi-xe-cong-nghe-da- lam-thay-doi-thoi-quen-nguoi-dung-viet-i287458.html Accessed on 17 March, 2023
[19] Dodds, W B., Monroe, K B., & Grewal, D (1991) Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 Febubrary, 2023
[20] Dehghani, M., Niaki, M K., Ramezani, I., & Sali, R (2016) Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers Computers in human behavior, 59, 165-
172 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
[20] DeVon, H A., Block, M E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D M., Hayden, S J., Lazzara, D J., & Kostas‐Polston, E (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability Journal of
Nursing scholarship, 39(2), 155-164 [Online] Available at: : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Accessed on 8 April, 2023
[21] Esmaeilpour, F (2015) The role of functional and symbolic brand associations on brand loyalty: A study on luxury brands Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 5 March, 2023
[22] Ekinci, Y., Dawes, P L., & Massey, G R (2008) An extended model of the antecedents and consequences of consumer satisfaction for hospitality services European Journal of
Marketing [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 1st March,
[23] Faircloth, J B., Capella, L M., & Alford, B L (2001) The effect of brand attitude and brand image on brand equity Journal of marketing theory and practice, 9(3), 61-75 [Online] Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/ Accessed on 17 March, 2023
[24] Grab (2022) Create a super app [Online] Available at: https://www.grab.com/vn/about/superapp/ Accessed on 17 March, 2023
[25] Gallaire, H., Minker, J., & Nicolas, J M (1989) Logic and databases: A deductive approach In Readings in artificial intelligence and databases (pp 231-247) Morgan Kaufmann [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 2nd April, 2023
[26] Grửnroos, C (1984) A service quality model and its marketing implications European
Journal of marketing, 18(4), 36-44 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 1st March, 2023
[27] Horng, J S., Liu, C H., Chou, H Y., & Tsai, C Y (2012) Understanding the impact of culinary brand equity and destination familiarity on travel intentions Tourism management, 33(4), 815-824 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[28] Huang, R., & Sarigửllỹ, E (2012) How brand awareness relates to market outcome, brand equity, and the marketing mix Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 92-99 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 27 March, 2023
[29] Hatch, k L., & Hoberts, J A (1985) Use of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to assess textile product quality Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 9(4), 341-357 [Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Accessed on 27 March, 2023
[30] Jahn, D (2011) Conceptualizing Left and Right in comparative politics: Towards a deductive approach Party Politics, 17(6), 745-765 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 2nd April, 2023
[31] Keller, K.L (1993), “Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol 57, pp 1-22 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 29 Feburary, 2023
[32] Kotler, P (2003) Marketing Management 11th edition Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
[33] Kamakura, W A., & Russell, G J (1993) Measuring brand value with scanner data International journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 9-22 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 1st March, 2023
[34] Kim, H B., Gon Kim, W., & An, J A (2003) The effect of consumer‐based brand equity on firms’ financial performance Journal of consumer marketing, 20(4), 335-351 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 1st March, 2023
[35] Konecnik, M., & Gartner, W C (2007) Customer-based brand equity for a destination Annals of tourism research, 34(2), 400-421 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 8 March, 2023
[36] Back, K J., & Parks, S C (2003) A brand loyalty model involving cognitive, affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction Journal of hospitality & tourism research, 27(4), 419-435 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 29 Feburary, 2023
[37] Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A (1995) Measuring customer‐based brand equity Journal of consumer marketing, 12(4), 11-19 [Oline] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/ Accessed on 1st March, 2023
[38] Lee, J S., & Back, K J (2008) Attendee-based brand equity Tourism management, 29(2), 331-344 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 8 March, 2023
[39] Mudambi, S (2002) Branding importance in business-to-business markets: Three buyer clusters Industrial marketing management, 31(6), 525-533 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 30 March, 2023
[40] Mohamad, M M., Sulaiman, N L., Sern, L C., & Salleh, K M (2015) Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 30 March, 2023
[41] Nandan, S (2005) An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective Journal of brand management, 12, 264-278 [Online] Available at: https://link.springer.com/ Accessed on 29 Feburary, 2023
[42] Nam, J., Ekinci, Y., & Whyatt, G (2011) Brand equity, brand loyalty and consumer satisfaction Annals of tourism Research, 38(3), 1009-1030 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 4 April, 2023
[43] Novikov, A M., & Novikov, D A (2013) Research methodology: From philosophy of science to research design (Vol 2) CRC Press
[44] Nath Sanyal, S., & Datta, S K (2011) The effect of perceived quality on brand equity: an empirical study on generic drugs Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(5), 604-
625 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 16 April, 2023
[44] Ophuis, P A O., & Van Trijp, H C (1995) Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer-oriented approach Food quality and Preference, 6(3), 177-183 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 6 April, 2023
[45] Percy, L., & Rossiter, J R (1992) A model of brand awareness and brand attitude advertising strategies Psychology & Marketing, 9(4), 263-274 [Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ Accessed on 27 March, 2023
[46] Q&me (2018) Survey on the popularity of ride-hailing apps in Vietnam [Online] Available at: https://qandme.net/vi/baibaocao/khao-sat-ve-muc-do-pho-bien-cua-cac-ung-dung-goi-xe- tai-viet-nam.html [Accessed 9 March 2023]
[47] Romaniuk, J., & Nenycz-Thiel, M (2013) Behavioral brand loyalty and consumer brand associations Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 67-72 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 4 April, 2023
[48] Russell-Bennett, R., McColl-Kennedy, J R., & Coote, L V (2007) Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting Journal of business research, 60(12), 1253-1260 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 6 April, 2023
[49] Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R R., & Oliva, T A (1993) Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names International Journal of Research in marketing, 10(1), 61-75 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 6 April, 2023
[50] Remenyi, D, Williams, B., Money, A and Swartz, E (2005) Doing research in business and management: An introduction to process and method London: SAGE Publication [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 6 April, 2023
[51] Roos Jr, L L., Nicol, J P., & Cageorge, S M (1987) Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection Journal of chronic diseases, 40(1), 41-49 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 6 April, 2023
[52] Swait, J., Erdem, T., Louviere, J., & Dubelaar, C (1993) The equalization price: A measure of consumer-perceived brand equity International journal of research in marketing, 10(1), 23-
45 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 1st March, 2023
[53] Steenkamp, J B E (1990) Conceptual model of the quality perception process Journal of
Business research, 21(4), 309-333 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 8 April, 2023
[54] Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A., (2015) Research methods for business students 7th Ed New York: Pearson Education
[55] Steckler, A., McLeroy, K R., Goodman, R M., Bird, S T., & McCormick, L (1992) Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction Health education quarterly, 19(1), 1-8 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 24 March, 2023
[56] Tasci, A D., Gartner, W C., & Cavusgil, S T (2007) Measurement of destination brand bias using a quasi-experimental design Tourism management, 28(6), 1529-1540 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 24 March, 2023
[57] Tasci, A D., & Guillet, B D (2011) It affects, it affects not: A quasi-experiment on the transfer effect of co-branding on consumer-based brand equity of hospitality products International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 774-782 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 24 March, 2023
[58] Tsang, E W (2014) Case studies and generalization in information systems research: A critical realist perspective The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 174-186 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 24 March, 2023
[59] Taylor, S A., Celuch, K., & Goodwin, S (2004) The importance of brand equity to customer loyalty Journal of product & brand management, 13(4), 217-227 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 19 March, 2023
[60] Vu (2022) The competition in the ride-hailing market will be more fierce Vneconomy [Online] Available at: https://vneconomy.vn/cuoc-dua-tranh-thi-truong-goi-xe-cong-nghe-se- khoc-liet-hon.htm [Accessed 8 March 2023]
[61] Vietnamfinance (2022) Grab Vietnam: Controversial Journey to Dominance [Online] Available at: https://vietnamfinance.vn/grab-viet-nam-hanh-trinh-nhieu-tranh-cai-den-vi-tri- thong-linh-20180504224273702.htm [Accessed 8 March 2023]
[62] Vửlckner, F., & Hofmann, J (2007) The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta- analytic review and assessment of its determinants Marketing letters, 18, 181-196 [Online] Available at: https://link.springer.com/ Accessed on 24 March, 2023
[63] Veale, R., & Quester, P (2009) Do consumer expectations match experience? Predicting the influence of price and country of origin on perceptions of product quality International business review, 18(2), 134-144 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 29 March, 2023
[64] Washburn, J H., & Plank, R E (2002) Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 10(1), 46-62 [Online] Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/ Accessed on 19 March, 2023
[65] Washburn, J H., Till, B D., & Priluck, R (2000) Co‐branding: Brand equity and trial effects Journal of consumer marketing, 17(7), 591-604 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 19 March, 2023
[66] Wang, L., & Finn, A (2013) Heterogeneous sources of customer-based brand equity within a product category Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(6), 674-696 [Online] Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight Accessed on 19 March, 2023
[67] Yoo, B., & Donthu, N (2001) Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer- based brand equity scale Journal of business research, 52(1), 1-14 [Online] Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[68] Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S (2000) An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(2), 195-211 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 28 March, 2023
[69] Zeithaml, V A., Berry, L L., & Parasuraman, A (1988) Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality Journal of marketing, 52(2), 35-48 [Online] Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/ Accessed on 28 April, 2023
Appendix 1 The questionnaire is presented below:
3 How often do you use transportation services (eg ride-hailing, car-sharing, public transit)?
4 How often do you use food delivery services (eg: GrabFood, BeeFood, BeaminEats)?
5 How often do you use digital payment services (eg: GrabPay, GoPay, BeaminPay)?
6 Are you familiar with the Grab brand?
The questionnaire related to the company Grab is presented below For each statement, please indicate your level of agreement or disagreement by selecting the appropriate number on the scale (1 = Totally disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Totally agree)
Disagree Neutral Agree Totally agree
The brand and services of the Grab company are well established
Even if other brands/ services have the same features as Grab, I would prefer to buy this brand
It makes sense to use the service of the company Grab instead of any other brand even if they are the same
I can quickly recall the symbol or logo of Grab
Some characteristics of Grab come to my mind quickly
60 of Grab that appeared on social media come to my mind quickly
The brand is widely distributed
I can recognize Grab among other competing brands
I consider the Grab company to be my first choice
The Grab company provides me with superior service quality as compared to any other brand
Even if another company is offering a lower rate, I still choose the service at the Grab company
I believe that Grab provides more benefits than other companies in its category
Overall, I am satisfied with the services of the Grab company
I intend to continue choosing the services of the Grab company
The brand Grab company is familiar to me
The Grab brand that appeared on social media has its own personality
This particular brand has a clean image
I trust the Grab company that owns the particular service/brand that appeared on social media
The brand of Grab has a differentiated image in comparison with the other brands