THE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAM

THE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAMTHE EFFECTS OF THE UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY ON FINANCIAL MARKET AND REAL ECONOMY: EVIDENCE IN VIETNAM

MOTIVATION OF RESEARCH

Mishkin (2022) stated that central banks worldwide predominantly employ a very short-term interest rate as their primary policy tool In the United States, the Federal Reserve (Fed) conducts monetary policy by adjusting the Federal funds rate According to Federal Reserve (2021), Fed implements monetary policy by employing a number of measures to control financial circumstances that promote progress toward its dual mission goals 1 Monetary policy has a direct impact on short-term interest rates, which in turn affects other financial conditions such as stock prices, the dollar's exchange value, and asset prices Through these channels, monetary policy affects the actions of people and companies, impacting total spending, investment, production, employment, and inflation in the United States Under normal economic circumstances, monetary policy changes short- term interest rates and various actions that central banks take to influence the economy and financial markets However, the effectiveness of conventional monetary policy (CMP) instruments has not yielded the desired outcomes about financial stability, deficit reduction, and debt reduction, particularly considering recent financial and debt crises and the more recent pandemic and its devastating effects on the global economy

In 2008, during the global financial crisis (GFC), and again in 2020, the Federal funds rate reached zero due to economic collapse caused by epidemics, requiring additional stimulus measures How can the Fed and other central banks support the economy when short-term interest rates still are near zero? To address the limitations imposed by the zero lower bound on short-term interest rates, the United States (US) and other advanced economies (AEs) have also introduced new measures known as non-standard monetary policy or unconventional monetary policy (UMP) According to Bernanke (2022), the central bank lowered its short-term interest rate target to zero and committed to keeping it at that level for as long as necessary When short-term interest rates approach the zero- bound (as shown in Appendix 5), economists refer to this as the "zero lower bound," signifying that the central bank's CMP tool has reached its limit and cannot be further employed to provide stimulus Consequently, not only is it difficult for central banks to reduce interest rates further, but it also becomes challenging to achieve their inflation goals

1 Federal Reserve’s actions, as a central bank, to achieve the “dual mandate” goals specified by Congress: maximum employment and stable prices in the United States

This global crisis has led to significant disruptions in the financial markets and a severe economic downturn in advanced economies and other countries worldwide

In response to this situation, UMP appeared and played a pivotal role in managing central banks' monetary policies, particularly during prolonged economic crises UMP seeks to impact macroeconomic variables by adjusting medium and long-term interest rates by altering the central bank's balance sheet, providing forward guidance, and implementing negative interest rates One of the most significant tools within UMP is Quantitative Easing (QE) In 2008, the Fed introduced a new tool: Large-Scale Purchases of longer-term securities, specifically government-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities (MBS) In various forms, this tool would play a central role in the monetary strategies of many central banks in the subsequent years (Bernanke, 2022) Implementing Large-Scale Asset Purchase (LSAP) operations has significantly expanded the Fed's balance sheet and affected long- term bond yields During the 2007–2009 financial crisis and the recent pandemic, the Fed and numerous other central banks relied extensively on these tools (Bernanke, 2022) Another essential tool is forward guidance, designed to influence financial conditions by shaping market expectations of future monetary policy

The widespread adoption of numerous UMPs during the GFC brought about significant transformations in both financial markets and the real economy, affecting both advanced economies and the rest of the world, particularly emerging economy markets (EMEs) and developing countries The deployment of UMP tools in AEs reduced bond yields and increased real GDP, stock prices, and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Additionally, it spurred portfolio flows into other countries, resulting in heightened real output growth and positive responses from the financial markets

The instability in global finance has persisted since the GFC The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2019 delivered a severe shock to economies worldwide Most nations resorted to lockdowns and isolation measures to have the pandemic's spread, resulting in economic stagnation Consequently, global GDP experienced a significant decline in 2019, approximately 3%, and is expected to continue falling sharply in the subsequent years In contrast, during the 2009 financial crisis, the global GDP loss was only 0.1% (Gopinath, 2020) Economies faced a pronounced and enduring increase in unemployment and public debt, and many businesses closed or went bankrupt To mitigate the adverse economic impacts of COVID-19, central banks swiftly implemented a range of robust policies These measures included interest rate cuts, liquidity support for commercial banks, and various forms of support for private sectors In this context, UMP once again played a pivotal role in the policy management of central banks when the pandemic hurt stock markets by reducing stock returns, and CMP did not reverse the adverse impact of the pandemic (Iyke & Maheepala, 2022)

In the United States, as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Fed took measures to support the economy in the face of new challenges In March 2020, there were two special sessions of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) intending to bolster economic activity On March 3, 2020, Fed lowered the Federal funds rate, initially from a range of 1.5% to 1.75% to a range of 1% to 1.25% Later, on March 16, the range was further reduced to 0%-0.25% (Tepper & Adams, 2024) In August 2020, the Fed announced significant changes to its monetary policy-making framework process initiated before the pandemic These changes were designed to enhance the potency of monetary policy in an environment where interest rates were already low In subsequent months, the Fed provided further clarity by explicitly stating its commitment to keeping interest rates low for as long as necessary Concurrently, concerns about the virus triggered the worst week in US financial markets since the 2007–2009 financial crisis, serving as a warning signal for the economy (Bernanke, 2022) This is only the second time this interest rate has reached the zero lower bound In this context, it is essential to examine how this UMP affects both the real economy and financial markets in AEs and other countries This analysis can provide valuable insights and implications for dealing with similar situations in the future This analysis is crucial considering the global health crisis caused by COVID-

19, which has posed unprecedented challenges to economies worldwide

The United States' new monetary policy operations always serve as necessary signals for central banks in developing countries to adjust their economic policy implementations Gai and Tong (2022) examine the international impact of the information on US’s monetary policy When the Fed tightens monetary policy, it reveals a tightened monetary stance and optimism about the economy, raising global output and asset prices Monetary announcements from the US can signal optimism or pessimism, with far- reaching consequences for global economic activity Therefore, the various approaches to this policy have raised significant concerns about their potential international spillover effects on developing countries' real economies and financial markets Identifying which countries are most affected by these US policy decisions is particularly interesting

The United States, one of the countries heavily affected by the pandemic crisis in

2019, has aggressively implemented fiscal and monetary policies to address the epidemic and boost its economy These measures include providing social security support packages, engaging in large-scale government asset purchases, conducting widespread overnight and term repo transactions, and reducing discount lending interest rates The capital inflows from implementing UMP tools in advanced economies can exert pressure on various aspects, including real output, asset prices, foreign exchange rates, and overall financial conditions These inflows also contribute to increased volatility in financial markets and real economic activities The effects of AEs' UMP measures can be transmitted through various channels, such as the portfolio rebalancing channel, the interest rate channel, the exchange rate channel, the asset price channel, and the credit channel Developing countries are particularly vulnerable to economic uncertainty, especially in the face of unexpected changes in monetary policy in AEs

A significant number of empirical studies have analyzed the domestic impact of UMP in advanced economies and its international spillover effects on the rest of the world Many of these studies have primarily focused on examining the response of financial markets within AEs such as (Breedon et al., 2012; Eksi & Tas, 2017; Guerello, 2018; Haitsma et al., 2016; Putniņš, 2022; Rahman & Serletis, 2023; Saiki & Frost, 2014; Weale

& Wieladek, 2022), interest rate (Bauer & Neely, 2014; Baumeister & Benati, 2010; Breedon et al., 2012; Jọger & Grigoriadis, 2017)… Another focus on the impact of UMP on the macro economy and economic activity in AEs (Fratzscher et al., 2016; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Jawadi et al., 2017; Meinusch & Tillmann, 2016) These findings make valuable contributions to the empirical evidence However, they have yet to address this issue in the context of a pandemic crisis, nor have they compared the differences between implementing UMP tools to manage a GFC crisis versus a pandemic crisis in various advanced economies, particularly those nations with significant influence on the development of other economies, such as the United States

Moreover, another strand of research concerns the international impact of this policy on EMEs and developing countries, but in limited quantities These studies pay more attention to the financial market in emerging economies, such as interest rates, asset prices, and exchange rates… (Anaya et al., 2017; Apostolou & Beirne, 2019; Bowman et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2016; Eser & Schwaab, 2016; Gupta & Marfatia, 2018; Tillmann, 2016; Uz Akdogan, 2023; Yilmazkuday, 2022), they also concentrate on the real economy as well (Chen et al., 2017; Fic, 2013; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019) or capital flow (Alper et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2014; Kiendrebeogo, 2016; Le et al., 2022)

While these studies have consistently yielded results such as increased portfolio inflows, heightened output growth, asset price surges, and exchange rate appreciation, their focus has been mainly on EMEs when examining the international spillover effects of advanced economies’ UMP However, it is essential to recognize that, beyond EMEs, other regions warrant investigation as well Some studies on related topics have underscored the critical role played by EMEs and frontier markets, particularly in the context of portfolio flows and the stock market Moreover, the dynamics of international monetary policy spillovers are intricately linked with portfolio rebalancing, asset price channels, and various other channels within the monetary transmission mechanism

Asian economies are also affected by the GFC and the UMP of advanced economies, especially the United States, in different ways (Punzi & Chantapacdepong,

2019) Some studies find that UMP in AEs has positive spillover effects on Asian and Pacific countries, such as capital inflows, stock market growth, currency appreciation, and production increase such as (Tran & Pham, 2020) Other studies find that these effects are minor or negligible, and that there are differences among Asian and Pacific countries (Rafiq, 2015) According to Outlook Frontier Markets (2021), in 2020, the return on equity of frontier markets is a 67% premium to developed markets Frontier markets, offering high returns and low correlations with other markets, are appealing to investors despite their higher risks and lower liquidity They have grown rapidly, becoming a popular investment class with lower debt and higher foreign-exchange reserves relative to their GDP With optimistic anticipation, many believe these markets, given their growth rates, will become economic success stories Research shows that investment efficiency in frontier markets surpasses some developing markets Sukumaran, Gupta, and Jithendranathan (2015) highlight substantial benefits for Australian investors diversifying into these markets, with

US investors reaping even greater rewards Furthermore, market shocks from developed countries impact frontier markets, particularly during crises (Samarakoon, 2011) Given these considerations, frontier markets present a compelling option for international investors, complementing investments in emerging market economies The importance of frontier markets is underscored, particularly considering monetary policy adjustments during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may necessitate a reevaluation of investment strategies This could involve a potential pivot towards investments in safe-haven assets and economies, or a focus on regions that yield higher returns

This study will revisit the spillover effects of UMP, focusing on the United States and frontier market economies in Asia, particularly Vietnam As per the KOF Globalization Index, Vietnam is recognized as a country with substantial trade and financial integration The study’s focus is on the Asian region due to its vibrant economic growth and its status as a significant economic center These economies are similar in their susceptibility to monetary policy uncertainties in advanced economies, a result of historical regional financial crises and their ongoing transition towards financial liberalization and economic globalization The study excludes developed Asian countries like Japan and newly industrialized countries like Taiwan, Korea, and Singapore The remaining Asian countries share similar levels of development and characteristics such as geography, economy, and demographics

Figure 1.1: Vietnam KOF Globalization Index

Source: KOF Swiss Economic Institute

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to analyzes how the United States' unconventional monetary policy spills over to affect Vietnam's financial market (specifically the stock market) and real economy (the production, inflation)

First, this study investigates the impact of US’s UMP announcements during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic on Vietnam's financial market, exploring how these policies, employed to stimulate the US economy, influence Vietnam through international spillover effects

Second, this research analyzes how Vietnam's real economy (specifically GDP growth and inflation) responds to US’s UMP shocks during the global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic Similar to the financial market, UMPs instituted to support the US economy can create spillover effects on Vietnam's economy through various transmission channels

Third, this research delves into the exploration of potential disparities in the international spillover effects of the US’s UMP on Vietnam’s financial market and real economy during two distinct periods of crisis: the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

To achieve the research objectives above, this study goes to answer three research questions corresponding to the specific objectives as follows:

4 According to market classification in the FTSE, MSCI, S&P and Russell indexes, Vietnam is classified as a frontier financial market

Research Question 1: To what extent did the announcements of the US's Unconventional

Monetary Policy during the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic influence the Vietnamese financial market?

Research Question 2: To what degree did US’s Unconventional Monetary Policy shocks contribute to cyclical fluctuations within the Vietnamese real economy during the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic?

Research Question 3: Do differences exist in the effects of the US’s UMP on both the

Vietnamese financial market and real economy during the global financial crisis versus the pandemic crisis? And What are the key differences between the two?

The study's scope is essential since it might affect the reliability of the study Hence, the next part discusses it.

THE SCOPE OF THIS STUDY

This study will investigate how the US’s UMP affects the Vietnamese stock market’s immediate reaction to official UMP announcements and the real economy of Vietnam from

2007 to 2022 Emphasis will be placed on two significant periods: the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic

First, the purpose of this study is to investigate the spillover effects of UMP on

Vietnam, a country that has the characteristics of a frontier financial market and an open, small economy These features make Vietnam a suitable case for analyzing how UMP actions in a major economy can influence the economic and financial conditions in a smaller and less developed economy This study concentrates on the UMP tools that the United States has employed since the GFC The study does not include the UMP tools of other advanced economies, such as the Euro area, Japan, and the United Kingdom, in the analysis

Second, the choice of the study period is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of the statistical model This research will examine the spillover effects of the US’s UMP on Vietnam’s economy from 2007 to 2022 This period covers the whole span of the US implementation UMP, which started in response to the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis This period also allows for a comprehensive analysis of how the US’s UMP affects the economic and financial conditions in Vietnam, as well as the role of major events, such as the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, in the international transmission of the US’s UMP

Third, this study will examine the immediate response of the Vietnamese stock market to the announcement of the US's UMP implementation, which serves as a proxy for all markets and different sectors 5 , following the announcement of the US’s UMP implementation The analysis will specifically focus on listed stocks on the HOSE, rather than encompassing the entirety of Vietnam's financial markets This emphasis is driven by several considerations:

(i) For the Vietnamese stock market, companies can be listed and if they meet the requirements according to the regulations The stocks of these companies can be listed on two exchanges, HOSE or HNX Due to its formation and development process, as well as its scale, HOSE primarily lists large enterprises from various fields The market capitalization of HOSE as of April 2022 is 13.12 times higher than HNX 6 , so the Vnindex (indicator of HOSE) can be represented the Vietnamese stock market, all companies listed on HOSE can also represent the listed companies on the Vietnamese stock market In addition, with the event study method, when determining abnormal returns (AR) based on the market and risk-adjusted model or the market-adjusted model, if combining all stocks in both stock exchanges, it will not be appropriate when calculating AR because the fluctuation margin on these two stock exchanges is different Specifically, the fluctuation margin of HOSE is +/- 7% while the fluctuation margin of HNX is +/- 10%

(ii) The study employs an event study method and relies on daily data Unfortunately, daily trading data is limited in the Vietnamese bond market

(iii) In the case of the foreign exchange market, the exchange rate is managed by the central bank, making it challenging to observe immediate fluctuations in response to the US’s UMP events

Finally, this study will examine the response of Vietnam's real economy, a proxy for price index and output, to the US’s UMP shocks The real economy is concerned with creating, purchasing, and moving commodities and services within an economy It contrasts with the financial economy, which focuses only on exchanging money and other financial

5 The study will analyze the stock price reactions of all industries listed on HOSE, classified according to the GICS industry classification standard The detailed industry classification is presented in Appendix 1

6 According to data published by the State Securities Commission of Vietnam assets that reflect ownership of or claims to ownership of goods and services from the real economy Since the term "real economy" applies to all real or non-financial components, real variables can be used to model the real economy

Appropriate methodologies, which will be explained in the following section, must discover the correct answers to the research questions.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES AND DATA

Research methodology

The event study method (ESM) is a statistical and econometric technique that analyzes the effects of specific events or shocks on financial markets or economic variables Widely used in finance, economics, and related disciplines, this method assesses how particular events impact asset prices, stock returns, and other key financial indicators According to Neely (2015), one must examine asset price changes as announcements or other news change market expectations to evaluate the effects of the UMP As a result, the technique may be applied to examine occurrences instantly ESM is current in addition to having quick access to a wealth of data since asset values, including stock prices, are prospective For that reason, this research employs the ESM to analyze the effects of the US’s UMP announcement on the Vietnam stock market based on the approach of (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Kolari & Pynnonen, 2011; Lubys & Panda, 2021; MacKinlay, 1997; Pacicco et al., 2018, 2021) Results from ESM will answer the first research question In addition, by comparing the research results in two periods, it will also answer part of the third research question, the difference in the effect of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market in two crisis periods

The structural vector autoregression (SVAR) model to study the effects of the US’s UMP shocks on Vietnam's real economy based on the methodology of (Carrera & Ramírez-Rondán, 2020; Cushman & Zha, 1997; Li et al., 2010; Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021) The monthly dataset spanning 16 years, from 2007 to 2022, will encompass various implementations of the US’s UMP since the GFC and the onset of the pandemic crisis SVAR has long been regarded as a cornerstone in empirical macroeconomics, enabling the study of expected responses of model variables to one-time structural shocks, such as policy actions or unexpected economic changes (Kilian, 2013) The essence of SVAR is to obtain structural parameters and shocks based on observing the reduced form VAR developed by (Sims, 1980) SVAR allows for as many types of shocks as time series variables in the set by assuming that observable variables are endogenous In contrast, shocks are the impulses that move the system

Consequently, the SVAR model will be used in this research to investigate the international spillover effects of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese economy from 2007 to

2022 Then, this study will use another variable representing the US’s UMP to replace the previous one to check its robustness These results will answer the second research question By comparing the research results in two periods, the study will answer the remaining of the third research question, the differences in the effects of the US’s UMP on the real economy of Vietnam in two crisis periods

The research methods used to address the research objectives are presented in

Figure 1.2: The research methods used to address the research objectives

Source: Proposed by the author

QE or Large-Scale Asset Purchase (Fed’s balance sheet)

Rest of the word (include VN)

Structural vector autoregression model (SVAR)

Research data

This study has three groups of data:

First, the daily stock index and stock prices in Vietnam from 2007 to 2022 are collected, focusing on defining the event window, event date, and estimation window This data has been sourced from the HOSE

Second, the announcement days of the US’s UMP announcements in the GFC period based on the research of the Fed and (Bowman et al., 2015), the event days in the COVID-

19 pandemic period based on the Fed and (Clarida et al., 2021)

Third, the data proxies for the US’s UMP and international transmission channels and Vietnamese macroeconomic data spanning the period from 2007 to 2022 The monthly data on the total assets of the Federal Reserve's balance sheets and the VIX index were sourced from the Federal Reserve Bank and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), respectively Additionally, data on foreign portfolio investment flows to Vietnam were obtained from the IMF For Vietnam's monthly macroeconomic indicators, including market interest rates, the nominal exchange rate of USD/VND, Vietnam's output, and inflation, data from 2007 to 2022 were collected from the IMF

Finally, in the section assessing the overview of the Vietnamese financial market in the period from 2000 to 2022, in addition to the daily stock index data introduced above, the study also uses data on the number of listed companies, market capitalization value, and trading volume from HOSE to analyze the overview of the Vietnamese financial market which represented by the stock market.

RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS

The main contribution of a study that examines the effects of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and the real economy In detail, the study has both academic and practical contributions as follows:

Firstly, the study's novel approach lies in its consideration of the overall spillover effects of the US's UMP on Vietnam, analyzing both the immediate financial market reaction and the subsequent, delayed effects on the real economy Thus, this research stands as one of the scholarly works that delve into the exploration of the influence exerted by the UMP of the United States on a frontier market, specifically Vietnam The study's findings hold significant implications for the development of effective monetary policies and investment strategies within both Vietnamese frontier markets and other similar contexts

Secondly, one of the novel aspects of this research is that it takes into account two significant crises, the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic It conducts a comparative analysis of their level of influence on the Vietnamese financial market and real economy This is a gap that previous studies seem not to have addressed, especially in a small, open like Vietnam Therefore, this research makes a significant contribution to the existing body of literature by providing a comparative analysis of the potential differences in the effects of the US’s UMP during two distinct periods of economic crisis due to the nature of these crises was fundamentally different - the GFC was primarily a financial crisis, while the COVID-19 pandemic was a health crisis that led to an economic downturn

Thirdly, unlike previous studies, this research employs a multifaceted approach to examine the effects of the US’s UMP by utilizing a range of different proxies for UMP, including the total assets of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and the Shadow Federal Funds Rate Through this comprehensive and rigorous approach, the study provides an in- depth understanding of the impact of the US’s UMP on Vietnam This contributes to the broader understanding of international monetary policy transmission and can inform policy decisions in both developed and frontier markets

Firstly, this research offers valuable insights into the Vietnamese financial market's reactions to US’s UMP announcements This knowledge indicates the relative efficiency of the Vietnamese market within the context of UMP transmissions Investors can benefit from this understanding in several ways as follows: Investors can anticipate market movements and make more informed decisions about when to buy or sell stocks based on US’s monetary policy updates Besides, based on the research results, investors can identify specific sectors within the Vietnamese stock market that are more resilient or potentially even benefit during economic downturns influenced by external factors like US’s policy changes

Secondly, the study also demonstrates that the Vietnamese economy benefits when the

US implements an expansionary monetary policy This is due to the increased inflow of capital, which in turn leads to higher asset prices and stimulates economic growth for the country As a result, Vietnam should fully utilize these capital inflows to drive its national development.

THE STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY

The study is structured into five chapters as follows:

This chapter provides an overview of the research background and motivation, research objectives and questions, research scope, and the structure of the study

Chapter 2: Theoretical framework and literature review

This chapter presents an overview of the theoretical framework of unconventional monetary policy, including its instruments and international transmission channels It also reviews relevant literature on the topic

In this chapter, the study introduces the research methods used to investigate the impact of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and the real economy The research data and data sources are also presented in this chapter

This chapter presents the results obtained from the ESM and SVAR It analyzes the research findings to elucidate the impact of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and the real economy

Chapter 5: Conclusions and policy implications

The last chapter offers conclusions, research contributions, and policy implications based on the research findings It also outlines the study's limitations and suggests directions for future research

This chapter introduces the research topic, which examines the impact of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and the real economy The chapter begins by providing an overview of how central banks use short-term interest rates as their primary policy tool and how CMP instruments have limitations in stimulating the economy during crises The chapter emphasizes the importance of understanding the spillover effects of UMP on developing and frontier markets, such as Vietnam

The research objectives are to analyze the effect of the US’s UMP on Vietnam and to identify potential differences in response during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic The scope of the study is outlined, focusing on the period from 2007 to 2022, which covers the US implementation of UMP during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic

The chapter concludes by describing the structure of the entire thesis, which includes theoretical frameworks, literature review, research results, and policy implications.

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Conventional monetary policy

Monetary policy is a fundamental tool utilized by governments and central banks to manage the flow of money within an economy This policy framework encompasses the actions and decisions designed to regulate the overall money supply, its accessibility, and prevailing interest rates The Cambridge Dictionary accurately defines monetary policy as

"monetary actions taken by a government to control the amount of money in an economy and its availability, for example, by changing the interest rate.”

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve (2021) defines monetary policy refers to the actions of central banks to achieve macroeconomic policy objectives such as price stability, full employment, and stable economic growth Its main policy tools are the target for the federal funds rate (the rate that banks charge each other for short-term loans), a key short- term interest rate Bank of England (2020) provides another definition, that monetary policy is an action that a country’s central bank or government can take to influence how much money is in the economy and how much it costs to borrow European Central Bank

(2021) also defines ‘monetary policy’ as the decisions taken by central banks to influence the cost and availability of money in an economy

From the above concepts, we can understand that conventional monetary policy is a macroeconomic management policy in which the central bank uses tools that affect operational objectives, modifying the money supply and interest rates influencing monetary policy's ultimate purpose: price stability, economic growth, and employment The monetary policy objective is to deliver price stability and consequently support the macroeconomic objectives, including growth and employment (Mishkin, 2022)

Mishkin (2022) indicated that (i) open market operations, (ii) discount lending, and (iii) reserve requirements are the three monetary policy instruments used by the Federal Reserve to control the money supply and interest rates Together, these three instruments - open market operations, discount lending, and reserve requirements - form the backbone of

LITERATURE REVIEW what is commonly referred to as classic or conventional monetary policy tools They are the primary means by which the Federal Reserve manages the money supply and interest rates, thereby influencing economic activity a Open market operations

An open market operation is a monetary policy instrument that central banks use to manage and control the amount of money in circulation This is achieved through the purchase or sale of government securities, such as treasury bonds

When the central bank buys these securities in what is known as a buying operation, it effectively injects money into the economy This is because the money used to purchase the securities goes into the banking system, thereby increasing the number of reserves and base money available As a result, the overall money supply in the economy increases Furthermore, this increase in the money supply tends to lower short-term interest rates, making borrowing cheaper and encouraging spending and investment

Conversely, when the central bank sells these securities in a selling operation, it essentially takes money out of the economy The money received from the sale of the securities is removed from the banking system, leading to a decrease in reserves and base money This reduction in the money supply has the effect of increasing short-term interest rates, making borrowing more expensive and discouraging excessive spending and investment

According to Mishkin (2022), open market operations, the principal drivers of the primary causes of fluctuations in the money supply, are fluctuations in interest rates and the monetary base, which were the most significant conventional monetary policy tools before the global financial crisis There are two types of open market operations: defensive open market operations and dynamic open market operations Defensive open market operations seek to offset changes in other variables that affect reserves and the monetary base The goal of dynamic, open market operations is to change the number of reserves and the monetary base

In summary, open market operations are a crucial tool for central banks to regulate the money supply and control interest rates, thereby maintaining economic stability and promoting sustainable economic growth b Discount lending

The discount window is the location where the central banks can provide reserves to banks—examining how the discount window functions can help you better grasp how the central bank influences the amounts of borrowed reserves The term “discount window” refers to the mechanism through which central banks can supply reserves to commercial banks Understanding how the discount window operates can provide valuable insights into the ways in which a central bank can influence the volume of borrowed reserves within the banking system

Primary credit is the most significant form of discount lending in the context of monetary policy It is a standing lending facility that allows financially stable banks to borrow from the central bank’s primary credit facility These loans are typically of extremely short duration, often just overnight This facility is designed to provide banks with a reliable source of liquidity, enabling them to meet their short-term funding needs and maintain their day-to-day operations (Mishkin, 2022)

Secondary credit is given to banks in financial trouble with major liquidity problems Seasonal credit is offered to meet the needs of several local banks in vacation and agricultural areas with seasonal deposits The seasonal credit interest rate is determined by averaging the federal funds rate and certificate of deposit rates (Mishkin, 2022) c Reserve requirements

Banks maintain accounts at the central bank, where they hold their deposits These deposits, also known as reserves, play a crucial role in the banking system and are subject to regulations set by the central bank

The total reserves held by a bank are divided into two distinct categories The first category is the required reserves, which are the minimum number of reserves that a bank is mandated to hold by the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States This requirement is intended to ensure that banks have enough liquidity to meet their short-term obligations and to provide a buffer against potential financial shocks The second category is excess reserves, which are reserves that banks choose to hold over and above the required minimum Banks may choose to hold excess reserves for a variety of reasons, such as to provide additional liquidity, to earn interest, or to meet unexpected cash outflows (Mishkin, 2022)

Unconventional monetary policy

In normal times, CMP dominates as an effective tool in implementing the central bank's monetary policy They are implemented via short-term interest rates or adjusting aggregate money by operations on the open market However, they have had demerits in recent years and ceased to be effective, especially when the global economy suffered several crises that strongly influenced national growth and social issues Mishkin (2022) showed two reasons for central banks to use UMP Firstly, a negative economic shock can result in an effective-lower-bound dilemma in which the central bank cannot significantly lower its policy rate (FFR) below zero Secondly, the central bank's capacity to stimulate economic growth is limited because of the disruption of financial markets, resulting in the inability to move cash to people and businesses with viable investment prospects, reducing economic activity Another reason is in a “new normal,” in which inflation that is too low can be as concerning as inflation that is too high, and in which a low, neutral interest rate, by limiting the space for short-term rate cuts, severely reduces the potency of traditional monetary policies (Bernanke, 2022) For both reasons, central banks require non-interest- rate measures, often known as non-standard monetary policy or unconventional monetary policy instruments, to stimulate the economy after the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic

Reserve Bank of Australia (n.d) provides the following definition of Unconventional Monetary Policy that it is a collection of actions implemented by a central bank to meet extraordinary economic conditions when typical monetary policy instruments are insufficient These unconventional measures are used when traditional tools, such as policy interest rates, minimum reserves, and open market operations, do not have the desired impact According to Smaghi (2009), UMP is defined as policies that directly target the cost and availability of external finance for banks, households, and non-financial companies These financial sources include central bank liquidity, loans, fixed-income securities, or equity

In summary, UMP can be understood as a set of measures taken by central banks to address abnormal economic conditions CBs only resort to these measures if CMP tools, such as short-term interest rates, reserve requirements, and open market operations, fail to achieve the desired outcomes (Ngô & Nguyễn, 2020) According to Bhattarai and Neely

(2022), many central banks, most notably the Federal Reserve (Fed), the Bank of England (BOE), the European Central bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan (BOJ), the Swiss National Bank (SNB), the Swedish Central bank (Riksbank), and the Danish National Bank (DNB) have employed UMP

There are four main unconventional monetary policy tools that central banks use to stimulate the economy after crises in which traditional monetary tools cannot work: (i) liquidity provision, (ii) asset purchases, (iii) forward guidance, and (iv) negative interest rates (Mishkin, 2022) According to Bhattarai and Neely (2022), the most important of these have been broad asset purchases, i.e., QE, and communication with the public, i.e., forward guidance (FG), to reduce medium- and long-term interest rates Table 2.1 shows the UMP tool used by major central banks worldwide in recent decades

Table 2.1: Unconventional monetary policy tools used by major central banks

Tools BoE BoJ ECB Fed

Expansion of lender of last resort facilities ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Source: Fiebiger and Lavoie (2021) a Expansion of lender of last resort facilities or liquidity provision

In response to the GFC, many central banks have made significant changes to their current market operations to deal with financial market turmoil that has become less liquid (i.e., assets cannot be easily converted into cash) Changes in the operations of central banks include:

- The Discount Window Expansion: The discount window is a facility that Fed uses to help commercial banks enhance their short-term liquidity by allowing them to borrow directly from the Fed, then they will pay Fed discount rate The expansion of the discount window appeared during the GFC period; Fed cut the discount rate by many basis points (25-50 basis points) from August 2007 to March 2008 (Mishkin, 2022)

- Term Auction Facility (TAF) is a program set by the Fed to help increase the liquidity of the US credit market These loans are usually less than one month TAF allows depository institutions to auction amounts of collateral-backed short-term loans Using TAF is more optimal than discount windows as it will enable financial institutions to borrow at a lower rate than the discount rate That rate is decided more competitively than the central bank's penalty interest rate (Mishkin, 2022)

- New Lending Programs: This program promoted liquidity in the financial system by broadening lending objects, such as investment banks, instead of traditional depository institutions New lending programs led to the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet since the beginning of 2008 b Forward guidance

Forward guidance is a technique that central banks employ to communicate with the public about the expected future path of monetary policy When central banks issue forward guidance, people and companies utilize that information to make spending and investment decisions Thus, advance guidance regarding future policies can impact current financial and economic situations (Fed, 2015)

According to Bowman (2022), to be deemed forward guidance, a statement does not have to be clear regarding future policy measures or the timing of possible acts It may be more qualitative in defining expected future policy actions, and in other situations, it may just reflect how the FOMC will think about future choices rather than indicating the future direction of policy activities The intention of all forward guidance is to influence the public's expectations about the FOMC's future monetary policy actions, and in doing so, affect longer-term interest rates and broader financial conditions to help support a path for inflation and economic activity that would be consistent with achieving the Committee's price-stability and maximum employment goals

According to Bernanke (2022), in addition to QE, in recent years, Fed and almost all other major central banks have relied heavily on forward guidance or communication by policymakers about how they expect the economy and policy to evolve This is one of the central bank's tools to convey messages to the public about its future monetary policy, and on that basis, to influence the financial decisions of households, firms, and investors It includes providing information regarding future policy implementation to influence policy expectations and announcing the willingness of central banks to pursue non-standard monetary policy in the long run The main driver of forward guidance is reinforcing the central bank's commitment to low-interest rates, which may help push down long-term interest rates Overall, forward guidance helps reduce uncertainty over a country's economic and financial prospects For instance, the Fed has committed to keeping the Fed funds rate at zero for an extended period With such a commitment, short-term interest rate forecasts in the market in the future are lowered, resulting in the decline of the long-term interest rate

The fundamental insight motivating forward guidance is that financial conditions depend on the current short-term policy rate and market expectations of future rates If market participants believe the funds rate will increase, they will also bid up long rates, tightening financial conditions For the same reason, if they come to expect a lower funds rate in the future, they will bid down longer-term rates To the extent that forward guidance influences expectations, it can become an additional policy lever Although most forward guidance is aimed at financial markets, in principle, central bank pronouncements could also affect broader public expectations c Asset purchases or quantitative easing

Purchasing assets of central banks is usually conducted on the open market, with assets only consisting of short-term government securities But all has changed since the GFC; central banks began performing a range of LSAP, also called QE According to Bernanke (2022), QE as large-scale purchases by the central bank of longer-term securities, aimed at reducing longer-term interest rates, easing financial conditions, and, ultimately, achieving macroeconomic objectives such as full employment and price stability Central banks use this program with long-term private sector assets to directly affect asset prices

QE is characterized as a strategy that increases the central bank's balance sheet to raise the amount of money available from the institution (in particular, bank reserves) in the economy The goal was to expand the amount of money in the economy by purchasing financial assets from the private sector This would lead to an increase in nominal spending and ensure that inflation was on pace to reach the CPI inflation target over the medium run

QE appears to work in practice, affecting financial markets—and, through them, the economy—via two broad channels: the portfolio-balance channel and the signaling channel (Bernanke, 2022)

Financial market and real economy

Financial markets are where people buy or sell a variety of financial assets, including stocks, bonds, currencies, and derivatives Financial markets help the economy by allocating resources, producing liquidity, and determining the values of various financial assets According to Madura (2021), a financial market is a place where financial assets (securities) like stocks and bonds may be bought and sold In financial markets, funds are transferred when one party purchases financial assets that were previously owned by another party Financial markets promote the flow of capital, enabling financing and investment by people, businesses, and government organizations Financial markets come in a variety of forms, including stock, bond, foreign exchange, and derivatives markets Every market has unique features, purposes, and players

Mishkin (2022) stated that the basic function of financial markets is to channel funds from savers who have an excess of funds to spenders who have a shortage of funds Financial markets can do this either through direct finance, in which borrowers borrow funds directly from lenders by selling them securities, or through indirect finance, which involves a financial intermediary that stands between the lender-savers and the borrower- spenders and helps transfer funds from one to the other According to Madura (2021), financial markets' primary purpose is to transfer money from savers with excess funds to spenders with insufficient finances Financial markets can accomplish this through two different methods: indirect finance, which involves a financial intermediary acting as a bridge between lender-savers and borrower-spenders to facilitate the transfer of funds between them, and direct finance, in which borrowers obtain funds directly from lenders by selling them securities

The efficiency of our economy, the conduct of firms, and the wealth of individuals are all directly impacted by financial markets Particular attention should be paid to three financial markets: the bond market, which sets interest rates; the stock market, which influences people's wealth and businesses' investment decisions; and the foreign exchange market, which affects the U.S economy significantly due to fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate The globalization of financial markets has accelerated at a rapid pace in recent years Financial markets have become increasingly integrated throughout the world (Mishkin, 2022)

There are different ways to classify financial markets, depending on the criteria used The most common classification criteria are claim on the issuer, other criteria can be mentioned: as maturity of claim, nature of claim, organizational structure, etc These criteria are academic in classification of financial markets However, with other levels of development of the financial market in the world, financial institutions offer a more practical classification method According to MSCI (2023), by grouping markets according to common characteristics, we are helping investors better understand and compare different markets MSCI communicates the list and analysis of equity markets under each category (Developed, Emerging, Frontier 7 and Standalone markets) Financial institutions such as FTSE, MSCI, S&P and Russell also divide the financial markets of countries around the world according to the 4 groups above

7 In this section, the study only focusing on the frontier market to clarify the purpose of researching

According Chen et al (2022), a frontier market is a country that is more established than the least developed countries but still less established than the emerging markets because it is too small, carries too much inherent risk, or is too illiquid to be considered an emerging market A frontier market is a market that has smaller market capitalization and liquidity, and they tend to have a lower correlation with price movements in other emerging and developed markets Since they are growing at an even quicker pace, this younger generation is destined to become tomorrow’s more mature emerging markets Frontier markets are geographically and economically diverse and are found all over the world – in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and central and eastern Europe The countries include Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Romania, Argentina and many more – over 40 in total (Serkin, 2015) These countries have been under-researched or ignored as they were too small and perceived as being too risky or difficult to enter because of foreign exchange restrictions and other investor barriers

Figure 2.4: Some frontier markets in the world

Frontier markets are attractive to investors who seek high returns and low correlations with other markets, but they also entail higher risks and lower liquidity than emerging or developed markets According to Serkin (2015), over the past 25 years we’ve seen emerging markets grow into a multi-trillion dollar asset class But today, we can invest in a whole new set of emerging markets: the frontier markets

Frontier markets are not only growing faster – they also have a number of characteristics that make them safer than imagined They have lower debt and higher foreign-exchange cash piles in relation to their gross domestic product According to Andrikopoulos et al (2016), frontier markets have now become a popular investment class among institutional investors internationally, with major financial services providers establishing index-benchmarks for this market-category The anticipation for frontier markets is optimistic uncertainty, and many people believe that, given their growth rates, these markets will be economic success stories

Some studies also show that the investment efficiency in this market is better than some developing markets Sukumaran et al (2015) finds that there are significant benefits for the Australian investor from diversifying into frontier markets However, the benefits to the US investor are much higher than that of an Australian investor The results from the holding out period also present significantly higher benefits to the US investor compared to the Australian investor In addition, shocks from developed countries also affect this group of markets, especially in crisis periods rather than normal periods (Samarakoon, 2011)

According to Cambridge Dictionary, the concept of real economy is the part of a country's economy that produces goods and services, rather than the part that consists of financial services such as banks, stock markets, etc The real economy is focused on the activities that allow human beings to directly satisfy their needs and desires, apart from any speculative considerations

According to Pirounakis (1997), a broad definition of the ‘real’ economy involves the production, transportation, and selling of goods and services — as opposed to the exchange of paper assets, which is the concern of the ‘paper’ economy of the world of finance A narrower definition would focus on material goods only, sectors like industry, commerce, agriculture, shipping, supermarkets, construction Either way, the ‘real’ economy, directly or indirectly, is, and always will be, the foundation of the economy

Output is an important indicator to measure the real economy Output is demanded by firms, by households, by the government and by foreigners Since interest rates and bank lending affect the demand for output, the financial sector interacts with the real economy

(Begg et al., 2014) Krugman and Wells (2018) states that the concept of economic growth is the growing ability of the economy to produce goods and services As we saw, economic growth is one of the fundamental features of the real economy Therefore, the important indicator to measure GDP is the gross domestic product (GDP) or GDP growth, which reflects the productive capacity and efficiency of an economy, as well as the living standards of its population In addition, indicators such as: industrial production index (IPI), consumer price index (or inflation), unemployment rate, balance of payments can also be used to measure the real economy.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE STUDY

The Efficient Market Hypothesis

The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) was formulated by Eugene F Fama in his research titled 'Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,' published in 1970 Fama (1970) proposed that a market is considered 'efficient' when prices consistently and fully incorporate all available information In other words, this theory's heart is the argument that stock prices reflect all available information, and it is difficult to regularly outperform the market by employing any information that is already publicly available

In Fama (1970) framework, he categorizes market efficiency into three levels: weak form, semi-strong form, and strong form (as presented in Figure 2.5)

Weak form efficiency implies that market prices reflect all publicly available information

Semi-strong form efficiency means market prices incorporate publicly available and immediate or real-time information In other words, when new information is released, stock prices adjust instantly to this information

Strong form efficiency is at the highest level, where market prices reflect all public and non-public information, including internal company information

Source: Summary by the author

According to Bodie and Kane (2020), the EMH posits that financial markets swiftly and efficiently incorporate all available information about securities Consequently, the security price typically reflects all information accessible to investors regarding its value This hypothesis suggests that a security's price rapidly adjusts in response to newly available information, ensuring it consistently equals the consensus market assessment of its value In an efficient market, there would be no overvalued or underpriced securities

The Efficient Market Hypothesis serves as one of the fundamental underpinnings for the event study methodology employed in this research The EMH theory reinforces the basis for the reactions of the financial market to announced information Specifically, when announcements are related to macro policies, UMP will immediately impact the financial market, including the stock market This theory explains the signaling channel and confidence channel in the transmission of monetary policy.

Taylor rule

The Taylor Rule was created by a researcher named John B Taylor - a Professor at Stanford University He conducted empirical research on the Fed funds rate over ten years, from 1980 to 1990, and found that the Fed funds rate fluctuation followed a rule related to inflation and economic growth According to Taylor (1993), the Fed funds rate needs to be adjusted by changes in the output gap (the difference between the potential and real GDP in

Cannot “beat the market” using market (price and volume) information

Cannot “beat the market” using either market information or other publicly available information

Cannot “beat the market” using any public or private information

Figure 2.5: Three level of efficient market a period) and the inflation gap (the difference between present and goal inflation rates) in the economy

Taylor Rule can be presented as follows:

- it : the FED funds rate target

- i * t : the real Fed funds rate at equilibrium

Formula (2.1) illustrates that changes in the real GDP growth rate and the inflation rate play a crucial role in determining Fed policy adjustments Consequently, interest rates are modified when these economic variables deviate from their trends (in the case of GDP) and their target levels (in the case of inflation) As mentioned earlier, central banks conduct monetary policy by establishing short-term interest rate targets Therefore, their primary objectives include the control of inflation and the stabilization of output Central banks aim to maintain low and stable inflation while minimizing significant fluctuations in output through interest rate tools The Taylor Rule is an essential basis for adjusting the interest rates of central banks in monetary policy operations to achieve GDP growth and inflation targets

AEs that follow the Taylor Rule can influence global monetary conditions which set the pace for global interest rates When these economies adjust their interest rates based on the Taylor Rule, it can influence global capital flows Investors may move their investments to countries with higher interest rates, affecting the global distribution of capital (Hofmann

& Bogdanova, 2012) This can influence international capital flows as investors seek higher returns in countries with higher interest rates This theory partially explains the capital inflows from developed countries into Vietnam in response to loose monetary policies, particularly unconventional monetary policies, implemented by these countries.

Asset pricing by discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation is a financial analysis method used to determine the value of an investment or business by estimating the present value of its future cash flows It is widely used in finance and investment decision-making processes

This was first introduced by (Williams, 1938), Williams suggested utilizing "evaluation by the rule of present worth" to determine an asset's value Common stock's value is the present value of its future net cash flows—selling price and dividend payments A stock's value under certainty is consequently equal to the discounted value of its future dividends The following formula shows this:

CFt: The cash flow of stock at time t r: the discount rate

The discount rate is usually derived using the capital asset pricing model (Markowitz, 1952; Sharpe, 1964) or the arbitrage pricing theory (Roll & Ross, 1980) An essential thing in the model of discounting cash flow is that when everything is constant, the discount rate decreases and will increase the stock price for two reasons: First, interest rates directly affect discount rates used by market participants to discount future cash flows Lower interest rates from QE lead to lower discount rates and higher expected future cash flows This should increase stock prices (Joyce et al., 2011; Kapp & Kristiansen, 2021) Second, interest rates alter the cost of borrowing for companies and their clients and thus also affect future cash flows.Low interest rates decrease the cost of borrowing, enabling companies to borrow money at a lower cost, which can increase their available cash flow

This study employs a theoretical framework to explain the reaction of asset prices (equities) to unconventional monetary policy The theory posits that the anticipation of persistently low interest rates can lead to an immediate and long-lasting surge in stock prices.

Milton Friedman's money demand theory

Keynes (1936) highlighted the importance of interest rates through the liquidity preference theory, a theory of money demand He concentrated on the motivation for people to hold money He identified three motives for the demand for money: transactions, precautionary, and speculative Friedman (1970) proposed the demand for money, in real terms, for the ultimate wealth holder is a function that is exhibited as follows:

P : the price index implicit in estimating national income at constant prices y : national income in constant price w : the fraction of wealth in nonhuman form (or the fraction of income derived from property) rm : the expected nominal rate of return on money rb : the expected nominal rate of return on fixed-value securities, including expected price changes re: is the expected nominal rate of return on equities, including expected price changes

(1/P) (dP/dt) is the expected rate of change of prices of goods and hence the expected nominal rate of return on real assets, and u is a portmanteau symbol standing for whatever variables other than income may affect the utility attached to the services of money

Each rate of return stands, of course, for a set of rates of return For some purposes, it may be essential to classify assets still more finely, for example, to distinguish currency from deposits, long-term from short-term fixed-value securities, risky from relatively safe equities, and one kind of physical asset from another (Friedman, 1970)

According to Friedman (1970), for demand by business enterprises, rates of return on money and alternative assets are highly relevant to business enterprises These rates determine the net cost to them of holding the money balances However, the appropriate rates may be quite different from those that are relevant for ultimate wealth holders For example, rates charged by banks on loans are of minor importance for wealth holders yet may be extremely important for businesses since bank loans may be a way to acquire the capital embodied in money balances So, interest rates are an essential factor that determines the money demand

This theory explains how an increase in the money supply could lead to a temporary boost in economic activity in the short run This is because more money in circulation allows for easier access to credit and investment, potentially stimulating economic expansion However, an increase in the money supply, without a corresponding increase in goods and services, is the primary driver of inflation Furthermore, this aligns with the empirical finding that expansionary monetary policy implemented by developed economies often triggers capital inflows to other nations These inflows, in turn, can exert upward pressure on the money supply of the recipient countries.

Tobin’s q theory

Tobin (1969) developed Tobin's q Theory, which explains the impact of monetary policy on financial asset prices (stocks) and then transmits the effect on other variables in the economy regarding the transmission channel of monetary policy Tobin's q equals the market value of a company divided by its assets' replacement cost

If q is high, the firm's market value is higher than the capital replacement cost This will stimulate firms to invest in new assets such as factories and equipment because their prices are cheap compared to the market value of the shares Therefore, when the ratio of q is high, enterprises are willing to issue new shares to purchase more assets for their operations, increasing social investment and increasing output

Monetary easing policy can increase the q ratio through two channels First, low- interest rates will not encourage investors to deposit money in banks, and investors can borrow more capital at lower costs than before Investors must look for other more attractive investment channels, including the stock market Therefore, the stock price may increase due to demand-pull Second, low interest rates also make fixed interest rate instruments such as bonds less attractive than stocks; investors may also switch from the bond channel to the stock channel In summary, easing monetary policy will increase stock prices and, therefore, increase the q ratio, and as a result, investment also increases.

Another reason is that when the central bank conducts easing monetary policy (M↑), the stock price tends to increase, resulting in increasing q ratio (Q↑) and new investment demand (I↑), output thus increasing (Y↑)

Tobin’s q theory helps explain the stock market fluctuations before changes in interest rates and money flow between portfolio rebalancing channels This happens not only domestically but also spreads to other international markets This theory also provides a basis for increasing asset prices and GDP growth through different transmission channels.

The Mundell-Fleming-Dornbusch model

From the IS-LM model, Mundell (1963) researched the theoretical and practical implications of the increased capital flows in the assumption of an open economy with flexible exchange rates When the central bank implements the expansion of monetary policy, this leads to the expansion of money and credit, thereby reducing interest rates However, a capital outflow that results in a deficit in the balance of payments and a depreciation of the exchange rate prevents the interest rate from falling In turn, exchange rate depreciation (normally) improves the trade balance and generates income and employment through the multiplier effect Therefore, monetary policy significantly impacts income and employment levels—not because it changes the interest rate, but because it encourages capital outflows, depreciates the currency's value, and results in an export surplus Also during this time, (Fleming, 1962) developed a similar model Therefore, this model is called the Mundell-Fleming model

The Mundell-Fleming-Dornbusch (MFD) model was considered by Rüdiger Dornbusch when it came to international monetary policy analysis A significant improvement was the contribution of Dornbusch (1976), who added rational expectations on the exchange rate movements and a sluggish adjustment of prices The MFD model predicts that an expansionary domestic monetary policy results in an exchange rate depreciation in a world with flexible exchange rates This model illustrates the change in an exchange rate through import price, resulting in the alteration of global expenditure under perfect capital mobility This approach relates to trade balance movements and emphasizes that the exchange rate channel is quietly crucial in open economies An essential outcome of MFD was the nominal exchange rate overshooting following a monetary shock

In summary, the theoretical foundations discussed above were used to analyze the effects of unconventional monetary policy on the specific economy They offer a framework for comprehending the cross-border transmission of unconventional monetary policy EMH suggests that domestic and international markets rapidly respond to central bank actions like quantitative easing announcements The Taylor Rule helps analyze how policies that deviate from typical interest rate adjustments impact global markets DCF models are influenced by central bank interest rate manipulations, changing asset valuations and investment decisions internationally Friedman's theory highlights that changes in interest rates from unconventional policies affect money demand globally, with potential spillover effects through trade and finance Tobin's q theory demonstrates how altered asset prices due to these policies influence investment and cross-border capital flows Finally, the Mundell-Fleming-Dornbusch Model illustrates how exchange rate fluctuations and interest rate differentials resulting from unconventional policies transmit their impact across countries, affecting the real economy around the world

The spillover effects of UMP from developed countries on the financial markets and real economies of other countries have been extensively analyzed through empirical studies These effects differ across groups of countries such as between AEs, AEs and EMEs, etc and depend on the specific economic variables being studied No single theory can fully explain the impact of UMP on both financial market variables and the real economy, or its effects on specific countries Therefore, a combination of economic theories is needed to provide a comprehensive understanding.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The effects of unconventional monetary policy

Unconventional monetary policy is examined from various points of view and methods in financial contexts They only focus on the effects of these policies on several aspects of the economy In general, the literature can be divided into three different strands and those fields are also the current issues that almost all researchers concerned: (i) the effects of the unconventional monetary policy on themselves, (ii) the international spillover effects of the unconventional monetary policy on others, and (iii) the research on UMP during crises, especially during pandemic crisis cause by COVID-19 Not only does the US implement UMP, but also other AEs These developed countries include countries such as the US, Japan, and England There are also ECB representing European developed countries because these countries use the common currency and are under the general management of the ECB

The first strand of this research topic is the effects of unconventional monetary policy on themselves Regarding the impact of UMP, numerous studies concentrate on its effects within representative developed countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the Euro Area These studies primarily explore the consequences of UMP within these countries themselves Studies on the impact of UMP during the GFC on the United States itself as mentioned (Anzuini & Rossi, 2022; Bauer & Rudebusch, 2014; Breitenlechner et al., 2021; Chebbi, 2018; Eksi & Tas, 2017; Gagnon et al., 2018; Gagnon et al., 2011b; Gürkaynak et al., 2019; Jawadi et al., 2017; Meinusch & Tillmann, 2016; Swanson, 2021; Thornton, 2017) In addition, the number of studies focusing on assessing the effects of UMP on developed countries or areas using UMP like

Although this field only focuses on AEs, there are many approaches to analyze the whole effect of UMP Most of the studies currently focus the analysis on the influence of these policies on financial markets such as (Altavilla et al., 2021; Ambler & Rumler, 2019; Bauer & Rudebusch, 2014; Eser & Schwaab, 2016; Fassas & Papadamou, 2018; Fendel & Neugebauer, 2020; Gagnon et al., 2011a; Haitsma et al., 2016; Hosono & Isobe, 2014; Krishnamurthy & Vissing-Jorgensen, 2011; Ricci, 2015; Safar et al., 2020; Swanson, 2021; Thornton, 2017); and real economies (Alessi & Kerssenfischer, 2019; Aòhoff et al.,

2021; Burriel & Galesi, 2018; Evgenidis & Papadamou, 2021; Rossi, 2022); separately or both of them simultaneously (Aùt-Sahalia et al., 2012; Breitenlechner et al., 2021; Eksi & Tas, 2017; Evgenidis & Papadamou, 2021; Horváth & Voslarova, 2017; Kapetanios et al., 2012; Saiki & Frost, 2020; Weale & Wieladek, 2022)

In general, the empirical results of studies discussed above indicated that; firstly, the implementation of UMP in AEs leads to an increase in the total assets of central banks resulting in a rise in output and price level and those effects are extremely strong for economic activities; secondly, the financial markets are affected significantly by the UMP shocks, proved by the raising of stock price, lowering long-term government bond yields and the depreciation of the local exchange rate Moreover, there are several studies analyzing the effect of UMP on asset price in AEs (Apergis et al., 2020; Gagnon et al., 2018; Gagnon et al., 2011b; Haitsma et al., 2016; Neely, 2015; Saiki & Frost, 2014) and the findings emphasized that the conduct of unconventional regime gives a strong boost to asset prices in these countries There is a lot of evidence for this situation when the stock index responds strongly to a surprise of UMP in particular periods, including pre-or post-GFC in 2008, it also occurred similarly but to a lesser extent when it comes to housing prices Moreover, few studies proposed the relationship between UMP and bank performance (Mamatzakis & Bermpei, 2016) its impact on the expectation and sentiment of investors (Galariotis et al., 2018; Lutz, 2015), or the role of risk aversion (Fassas & Papadamou, 2018), however, these studies are not enough remarkable, and they are not also insignificant in number

The second strand of this research topic is the international spillover effects of AEs’ UMP on the rest of the world, focusing on developing countries or EMEs Several empirical studies have been conducted to explore the economic reaction to the UMP shock in AEs, with a particular focus on EMEs such as (Canzoneri et al., 2021; Dées & Galesi, 2021; Fratzscher et al., 2018; Kiendrebeogo, 2016; Rosa, 2011) In addition to looking at the influence of the US’s UMP policy, the studies focus on the UPM policy of the UK, Japan, and ECB on EMEs such as (Andreou et al., 2022; Apostolou & Beirne, 2019; Banerjee & Goyal, 2020; Walerych & Wesołowski, 2021) Besides examining the impact of UMP on EMEs, many studies focus on developing countries or different regions such as Latin America, Asia, Gulf countries, and BRICS such as: (Andreou et al., 2022; Assoumou- Ella et al., 2022; Carrera & Ramírez-Rondán, 2020; Dées & Galesi, 2021; Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Inoue & Okimoto, 2022; Kiendrebeogo, 2016; Kim & Yang, 2011; Lee et al., 2020; Lubys & Panda, 2021; Miyajima et al., 2014; Rafiq, 2015; Sugimoto & Matsuki, 2019; Tran & Pham, 2020; Xu & La, 2017; Yang & Hamori, 2014) Few studies have studied the impact of UMP policies of developed countries on a particular country such as (Chen & Tsang, 2020; Ijiri & Jinushi, 2021; Janus, 2020; Kabundi et al., 2020; Lakdawala, 2021)

In general, the studies listed above mainly concentrated on financial markets and the real economy in these nations, and these findings show that the expansion of AEs' UMP had a considerable influence on the rest of the world, particularly EMEs They showed evidence of international spillovers UMP can lead to a growth in portfolio flows accompanied by an increase in real production and a variety of movements in financial variables, such as reduced bond rates, an increase in the stock market, or the appreciation of the local exchange rate However, not all research provides the same results Some studies explored the change in return of real estate (Gupta & Marfatia, 2018) and the findings also prove that UMP has a positive impact in the short-run on EME; Other research suggested that one of the typical UMP instruments in AEs, like as quantitative easing, had a considerable impact on capital flows (Alper et al., 2020; Kiendrebeogo, 2016; Tillmann, 2016) indicated that these policies in AEs boost capital flows to EMEs and developing nations and that the introduction of UMP led to a considerable rise in portfolio flows, cross-border credit flows, and so on in these countries A few studies have studied the impact of UMP on other objects such as the performance of global mutual funds (Cenedese & Elard, 2021), capital structure and firm performance (Gürkaynak et al., 2019), operational health of banks (Acharya et al., 2019)

The other consideration in this field is analyzing the effect of UMP in a more specific scope focused on the Asia and Pacific region, but several studies are quietly limited, they paid less attention to this area despite Asia being one of the markets that have a key role for international investors and industrialized countries Some studies on UMP impact on countries in Asia (Tran & Pham, 2020), investigate the spillover effect of the US’s UMP on the Asian developing nations (including China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam), Lee et al (2020) research about the effects of US’s UMP On Asian Stock Markets (including China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, The Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand (Rafiq, 2015) explores the effect of the US’s quantitative easing on a group of countries in Asia (including Viet Nam) They discovered that the spillover impact was likely to be minor and that the source of this disparity may be a group of Asian frontier economies The study of (Sugimoto & Matsuki, 2019; Xu & La, 2017) also considers the impact of US UPM policy on the financial markets of Asian countries, focusing on countries such as Singapore, South Korea, and Hong Kong Although there are few studies in this field, empirical data show that nations in Asia and the Pacific region have considerable responses to the shock of UMP in AEs, particularly the US, in terms of economic activity and financial variables First, the large-scale growth of UMP in AEs pushed capital inflows to this area, leading to an increase in the stock market and the appreciation of local currencies; Second, it had a favorable influence on these nations' actual production Some research, however, appears to be different, showing evidence of this impact to a lesser amount

More specifically, the study will delve into several studies for Asian countries Rafiq

(2015) investigates the impact of the United States' quantitative easing on a group of Asian countries The reason for this disparity may be due to the group of Asian countries belonging to the region's frontier economy Lee et al (2020) evaluated the impact of QE on return and volatility in selected Asian markets from the US market They found that the

United States QE policies have had a significant influence on the correlations between the United States and various Asian countries, with a significant progressive drop in correlations during the most recent QE, and increased stock market liquidity boosts financial spillovers dramatically Tran and Pham (2020) analyze the monthly responses of Asian emerging market equity prices, long-term interest rates, and currency rates to the UMP in the United States The first finding is that UMP shocks from the United States are associated with a rise in stock prices, a fall in long-term interest rates, and currency appreciation in Asian developing countries In contrast, traditional US monetary policy shocks have a detrimental impact on these recipient countries These empirical findings suggest that policymakers in Asian developing countries should be concerned about the potential spillover effects of the US’s UMP if it is adopted

The final strand of this research topic is the research on UMP during crises, especially during the pandemic crisis caused by COVID-19 Because the crisis is the beginning point for implementing these reforms However, many of the papers given tended to highlight worries about the GFC while overlooking the fact that a pandemic crisis created by COVID-19 is presently in place Indeed, they paid little attention to examining the different effects of the US's UMP on other countries during two different crises: the GFC period and the pandemic crisis, even though COVID-19 is one of the most important factors influencing monetary policy in AEs and the greatest threat to the global economy Most studies investigated the impacts of UMP during the COVID-19 pandemic such as (Benigno et al., 2022; Nozawa & Qiu, 2021; Rao & Kumar, 2023; Uz Akdogan, 2023) research on the impact of UMP on the financial market during covid 19, focusing on bond yield (government, corporate) exchange rate and stock return in the country where UMP is implemented A few studies on the impact of UMP on the financial market and real economy such as (Feldkircher et al., 2021) Ngô and Nguyễn (2020) refer to the application of unconventional monetary policy and analyze the actual application of UMP in countries around the world and Vietnam during the crisis, especially, the COVID-19 pandemic Additionally, Nguyễn and Ngô (2021) also indicate that a shock in the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve has a strong impact on Vietnam through two main channels: the portfolio rebalancing channel and the asset price channel In particular, a few studies have compared the difference in the impact of UMP in the two periods GFC and COVID-19 pandemic such as (Putniņš, 2022; Rahman & Serletis, 2023)

In addition, research on UMP policy in developed countries (US, UK) to other markets in both GFC and COVID-19 periods is still limited, these studies focus mainly on financial markets Ntshangase et al (2023) Analyze the impact of the US’s UMP on inflation and non-inflation targeted developing markets from 2000Q1 to 2020Q4 following the credit crisis and during COVID-19 The result shows that for both inflation-targeting and non-inflation-targeting developing nations, the US’s UMP causes a spike in the exchange rate and a decline in the central bank policy rate The share prices, however, were not significantly impacted Except for the reaction of equity prices, the empirical results are statistically significant, reliable, and comparable with other investigations The study of Cortes et al (2022) only claimed that the results of the COVID-19 interventions for the identical AEs and EMEs groups indicate a favorable spillover of Fed policy for both countries The Fed's policy announcements during COVID-19 significantly affected EMEs' short-term maturities Furthermore, when focused on specific country stock markets, the analysis discovered particularly favorable disaster-risk spillovers that are predominantly concentrated in Asia (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia) Rebucci et al (2022) looked at the consequences of UMP during the COVID-19 outbreak-related worldwide financial upheaval They discovered that, as compared to prior interventions made during the GFC, the effect of QE announcements during this crisis on EMEs was much stronger, even though they solely focused the study on government bond yields and bilateral US dollar exchange rates In conclusion, several research studies have found that EMEs are more responsive to large-scale interventions (the COVID-19 QE announcements), whether domestic or foreign in origin

Although several papers have studied the impact of UMP in advanced economies or emerging market economies, they have overlooked the impact of UMP on frontier markets These markets are also instrumental in the transmission of capital flows among countries related to international investors Furthermore, there are few studies that explore the cross- border impact of UMPs on the real economy and financial markets of frontier markets in Asia The number of countries included as a research sample for Asia is still quite limited, and the impact of the US’s UMP on this region has not been comprehensively assessed The emergence of marginal economies along with emerging markets is also an issue that should be studied in this area to more fully assess the impact of non-standard monetary policies in AEs, especially the US and EU Currently, Vietnam’s stock portfolio in the marginal market portfolio accounts for the largest share, and its level of globalization integration is increasing Because the Vietnamese market is a small, open economy that is highly integrated with the US and the global economy, it is vulnerable to external shocks and financial contagion Therefore, it is essential to study the impact of major changes in the monetary policy of developed countries, especially the United States, on the Vietnamese economy and financial market

This study analyzes the impact of US’s UMP on Vietnam through the signaling channel when the US gives announcements about UMP, and through the Fed’s asset purchases (reflected in the expansion of the central banks’ balance sheet) capital flows will flow into Vietnam through the portfolio rebalancing channel With this approach, the study will provide a more general perspective on the impact of UMP on the frontier market like Vietnam Moreover, the research on comparing the response of the economy to the US’s UMP shocks during the pandemic crisis and GFC remains limited This study also adds to the literature on the international effects of the US’s UMP on open, small, and frontier markets both in the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic crisis period

Research related to the impact of UMP on both the countries implementing the policies and other countries, especially the United States, are summarized in Figure 2.6

Figure 2.6: Summarize the related research

US Domestic effects: Rahman and

Nozawa and Qiu (2021); Anzuini and Rossi (2022); Feldkircher,

Apergis, et al (2020); Gürkaynak, et al (2019); Alessi and

Gagnon, et al (2011); Fassas and

Gambacorta, et al (2014); Bauer and Rudebusch (2014); Aùt-Sahalia, et al (2012); Krishnamurthy and

Other Aes Domestic effects: Akdogan (2023);

Evgenidis and Papadamou (2021); Aòhoff, at al

Urbschat and Watzka (2020); Saiki and Frost (2020); MacDonald and Popiel (2020); Fendel and Neugebauer (2020);

Otsubo (2019); Martins, et al (2019); Ambler and Rumler (2019); Acharya, et al (2019); Burriel and Galesi (2018); Horváth and Voslarova (2017);

From other AEs to the rest of the world: Janus

(2020); Kenourgios, et al (2019); Bluwstein and Canova (2016);

Effect finacial market: Ntshangase, et al (2023); Cortes, et al (2022); Miranda-Agrippino and Nenova (2022); Inoue and Okimoto (2022); Ferreira and Serra (2022); Andreou, et al (2022); Yildirim and Ivrendi (2021); Lubys and Panda (2021); Lakdawala (2021); Ono (2020); Lee, et al (2020); Papadamou, et al (2019); Inoue and Rossi (2019); Rogers, et al (2018); Fratzscher, et al (2018); Yang and Zhou (2017); MacDonald (2017); Galloppo and Paimanova (2017); Bernhard and Ebner (2017); Kiendrebeogo (2016); Fisher, et al (2016); Neely (2015); Mukherjee and Bhaduri (2015); Bowman, et al (2015); Yang and Hamori (2014); Mishra, et al (2014); Dahlhaus and Vasishtha (2014); Cho and Rhee (2014); Bauer and Neely (2014); Awartani, et al (2013); Rosa (2012); Glick and Leduc (2012); Rosa (2011)

Effect real economy: Assoumou-Ella, et al (2022); S Papadamou, et al (2019); Georgiadis (2016)

Effect both financial market real economy: Sikhwal (2022);

Walerych and Wesołowski (2021); Ijiri and Jinushi (2021);

The methodologies review

When addressing the analysis of the impact of UMP, it is pertinent to delve into the methodologies employed The empirical literature delineates two primary approaches, each about distinct fields that are currently of concern: (i) event study method, and (ii) vector autoregressive model approach (VAR model approach)

The analysis of monetary policy for researchers and policymakers has been supported by the vector autoregression approach platform introduced by Sims (1980) VAR models are the most widely used approach for studying the consequences of conventional monetary policy The literature is unanimous about the impact of monetary policy on output or inflation In other words, VAR-based models are used to assess impacts on lower frequency variables such as output and inflation, which are often of primary concern to central banks Another advantage of employing VAR models to estimate the impact of unconventional monetary policy is that they may be readily linked to current monetary policy research Nowadays, analyzing the domestic effect of UMP on AEs is even more important when using this model, as a result, many studies up to now have used standard VAR to deal with this situation (Breitenlechner et al., 2021; Dahlhaus & Vasishtha, 2014; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Horváth & Voslarova, 2017; Inoue & Rossi, 2019; Inoue & Okimoto, 2022; Mukherjee & Bhaduri, 2015; Saiki & Frost, 2014; Sugimoto & Matsuki,

2019) The international impact of UMP on other countries is also usually analyzed by applying VAR models (Anaya et al., 2017; Bowman et al., 2015; Sugimoto & Matsuki,

There is no denying the advantages of the VAR model in studying issues related to monetary policy; however, it also has some disadvantages The greatest flaw in VAR is that it does not distinguish between independent and dependent structural shocks when assessing how variables respond to independent structural shocks As a result, Bernanke et al (2004) suggested using a structural VAR model to address the issue because the impulse response function and variance decomposition for the studied variables might not be correct in the VAR model

According to Neely (2015) to evaluate the effects of the UMP, one must examine asset price changes as announcements or other news change market expectations Event studies investigate whether the disclosure of information concerning UMP measures alters financial market expectations, resulting in changes in financial market variables Meanwhile, UMPs are often expressed in the form of speeches or announcements such as forward guidance or QE (Unlike CMP, conducted via interest rates) These policies, once officially announced, will be considered the event date and the researchers will consider the fluctuations of factors in the financial market such as stock prices, bond interest rates, and exchange rates around the event date to assess the impact of this event on those factors In other ways, these policies are often modeled as binary indicators or dummy variables in event study regression but for other models, such as the VAR model, it is difficult to do (Meinusch & Tillmann, 2016) Therefore, event study dominates as an effective method, especially when they have concentrated on the effect of UMP on AEs themselves and on financial markets which have quick and strong responses with the adjustment of monetary policy

Event studies are effective tools for evaluating the effects of UMP even though they are straightforward and intuitive because (i) news about monetary policy will likely dominate other non-monetary news during the announcement window given the high frequency of the data and the relatively small event window; (ii) given that the stock market reacts quickly to news, it is conceivable that it would accurately represent the monetary policy shocks within the event window However, if monetary policy news cannot outweigh other shocks inside the event window or if the stock market responds slowly to monetary policy surprises, an event study is unsuitable This method allows the analysis of the effect of official announcements or speeches by the central bank related to UMP on the variables concerned

Studies using ESM to examine the effects of UMP focus on two groups: the effects on the financial market of those countries themselves and the effects on the rest of the world In the scope of this study, by ESM method to study the influence of the US’s UMP on other countries can be mentioned as follows (Cortes et al., 2022; Falagiarda et al., 2015; Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Glick & Leduc, 2012; Lubys & Panda, 2021; Mishra et al., 2014; Neely, 2015; Rosa, 2011, 2012; Ruiz, 2015) ESM used in these studies varied However, it is all based on the identification of unusual fluctuations around events related to the use of UMP tools such as the announcement of LASP, forward guidance, and sometimes the statement of the head of the Fed This method focuses on factors in financial markets such as the exchange rate between the USD and other currencies, the change in the yield of different types of bonds (government, corporate, and foreign bonds with various maturities…), or the difference in interest rates gaps between bonds of other maturities, and the rate of return of a stock index or individual stocks Depending on the type of asset studied, the ESM approach will use different methods to identify and analyze unusual fluctuations related to the yield or price of the asset Studies can focus on many different asset classes simultaneously, such as those of (Falagiarda et al., 2015; Glick & Leduc, 2012; Mishra et al., 2014; Neely, 2015; Rosa, 2011, 2012) In particular, the use of ESM to extend to many different sectors before different macro events has been suggested and carried out by the research of (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Lubys & Panda, 2021) The above studies mostly use daily data, and a few use intraday data such as (Rosa, 2012) Overviews of ESM research methods are presented in Table 2.3

However, although it is significantly useful in applying the event study method, evidence shows that it also has several limitations Firstly, variables expressing UMP like

QE or forward guidance are likely to be endogenous and they cannot easily be modeled as dummy variables (Meinusch & Tillmann, 2016) Besides, the effect of UMP shock on other variables cannot be observed through the impulse response functions which are calculated in all VAR-based models Secondly, because event study often uses high-frequency data

(daily, intra-daily), the study is limited to the impacts on variables with the same frequency, particularly financial market indicators such as interest rates, the yield curve, or asset prices While variables with lags before other policies, such as GDP and inflation, this method cannot assess the impact Therefore, an event study should only be used to evaluate the impact of a specific event, piece of news, or announcement on a company or stock or financial factors such as interest rate, bond yield, etc

In the scope of this study, the author focuses on using the ESM to study the impact of the US’s UMP on stocks on the Vietnamese stock market during the period of the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic To analyze the influence of the US's IMP on sectors, study the use of ESM according to the approaches of (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Lubys & Panda, 2021) These are the two periods in which the US implemented the UMP policy to support the economy, this also created spillover effects to other countries including Vietnam

Table 2.3: Studies using the ESM relate to the US’s UMP policy announcements impacting financial markets

UK EU government bonds, stocks price GFC

Panda (2021) ESM US, EU BRICS

Stock price sectors of interest: consumer, financials, and materials

JP BRICS The stock price of eleven sectors GFC

UK and BoJ macroeconomic; financial sector and Libor–OIS spread

Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, UK bond yields, long-term interest rates, U.S TIPS- implied inflation expectations, daily exchange rates, and equity index

Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania

Exchange rate; Stock market index; Interbank rate;

(2014) ESM US EMEs (21 countries) exchange rates, government bond yields, and stock prices

US US Asset Prices (Bond;

Canada, Australia, Japan, and the EU interest rates; exchange rates; commodity prices;

Stock returns, interest rates, and exchange rates GFC Gagnon et al

(2011) ESM US US Interest Rate Changes

EMEs Bonds yields; Equity price, exchange rates GFC

ESM US US interest rate data on money-market futures, overnight index swaps (OIS), and Treasury securities

Suchanek (2014) ESM US EMEs Bonds yields; Equity price, exchange rates GFC

(2011a) ESM US US interest rate, CPI, unemployment GFC

(2011b) ESM US US Interest Rate GFC

(2022) ESM EU EU Bond (gov, bank, corporate)

(2021) ESM US US credit spreads COVID-

Source: Compiled by the author 2.3.2.2 Vector autoregressive model approach

With all the pros and cons of the event study method discussed above, several papers have already found another model that can overcome several disadvantages The two main drawbacks of event studies are heavy assumptions about the identification of monetary policy shocks and the focus on a very short period In this regard, the standard event study methodology does not provide an estimate of the persistence of a monetary policy shock (Wright, 2012)

Some studies applied the Qual VAR model as a more efficient way to combine a standard VAR technique with the policy announcements modeled as a binary variable in event studies literature (Chebbi, 2018; Galariotis et al., 2018) A Qual VAR addresses the gap between the conventional VAR literature of policy shocks and UMP actions However, Qual VAR also has a major drawback that, if chosen to use, needs to be seriously considered for its correctness It is impossible to determine whether the Qual VAR results are reliable because the setting for latent variables significantly influences the quality of the latent variable identification Thus, despite being a useful instrument for forecasting, using the Qual VAR for economic analysis is not recommended (El-Shagi & Von Schweinitz,

On the other hand, Sims (1980) introduced a vector autoregression method platform to aid in the examination of monetary policy for scholars and policymakers VAR models are the most widely used approach for studying the consequences of traditional monetary policy The literature is unanimous on the impact of monetary policy on output or inflation

In other words, VAR-based models are used to assess impacts on lower frequency variables such as output and inflation, which are often of primary concern to central banks Another advantage of employing VAR models to estimate the impact of unconventional monetary policy is that they may be readily linked to current monetary policy research Nowadays, analyzing the domestic effect of UMP on AEs is even more important when using this model, as a result, many studies up to now have used standard VAR to deal with this situation (Breitenlechner et al., 2021; Dahlhaus & Vasishtha, 2014; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Horváth & Voslarova, 2017; Inoue & Rossi, 2019; Inoue & Okimoto, 2022; Mukherjee & Bhaduri, 2015; Saiki & Frost, 2014; Sugimoto & Matsuki, 2019) The international impact of UMP on other countries is also usually analyzed by applying VAR models (Anaya et al., 2017; Bowman et al., 2015; Sugimoto & Matsuki, 2019) There is no denying the advantages of the VAR model in studying issues related to monetary policy; however, it also has some disadvantages When examining how variables respond to independent structural shocks, VAR makes no distinction between independent and dependent structural shocks As a result, Bernanke et al (2004) proposed utilizing a structural VAR model to address the problem because the VAR model's impulse response function and variance decomposition for the researched variables could be incorrect

SVAR has been used in a variety of research to study the international spillover effects of UMP on the rest of the world Peersman and Smets (2001) used the SVAR model with the monthly dataset for the Euro Area to investigate the macroeconomic effects on the Euro area economy of conventional interest rate changes and unconventional monetary policy actions The results showed that a rise in the money supply or an increase in the total assets of the central bank's balance sheet has a hump-shaped influence on economic activity and a long-lasting effect on consumer costs Bowman et al (2015) also applied SVAR and other methods to examine the responses of the sovereign yields, exchange rates, and equity prices in EMEs to the US’s UMP The results indicated that there was a positive effect on stock price to a shock relating to lower US yields, and caused EMEs currencies to appreciate Finally, for the majority of nations, including Brazil, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Singapore, and Thailand, the impact of

US monetary policy disruptions on EMEs sovereign rates is negative Carrera and Ramírez-

Rondán (2020) evaluated the effects of the Fed's QE programs on important macroeconomic factors for Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru which are small open economies in Latin America The findings demonstrated that the QE shock causes credit to expand, which in turn prompts a positive reaction of the domestic interest rate over the medium term After a QE shock, financial variables like credit respond more quickly and forcefully than production (GDP) and prices (CPI) By applying the SVAR model, Saiki and Frost (2014) showed that UMP in Japan's impacts on asset values had led to increased income inequality These findings continue to hold with an extended time horizon, a richer dataset that includes labor market data Zabala and Prats (2020) also used SVAR to investigate the effects of QE in the ECB The results suggested that unconventional monetary policy shocks appear to have a short-term beneficial effect on economic development The findings indicate that the same inferences cannot be drawn about inflation, whose rise was fueled by demand shocks and shock by itself Another research by Yildirim and Ivrendi (2021) also used SVAR models with high-frequency daily data to examine the international spillover impacts of quantitative easing on AEs and EMEs The empirical results showed that a US’s UMP shock caused an increase in stock prices, an appreciation in the exchange rate, and a decline in long-term yields in AEs, especially in EMEs The advantages of SVAR made it important to examine the international spillover effects of the US’s UMP It can simulate the contemporaneous and lag interactions between the US’s UMP and overseas financial markets In addition, by putting limitations on the interactions across blocks, such as block homogeneity restrictions, the VAR system can be divided into blocks, such as domestic and international, and figure out the block structure of the system (Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021)

Research gap identification

Firstly, to the best of my knowledge up to now, literatures pay little attention to frontier markets although it also has a key role in the investment of international investors According to Orhan et al (2016) since frontier markets are at their early stages of growth and capitalization they can provide convenient investment opportunities Meanwhile, according to Uludag and Ezzat (2016), frontier markets are at the end of the permissible investment horizon, beyond which markets are unsuitable for investment As a result, investing in frontier markets is fraught with constant hazards and obstacles, making navigating such markets equivalent to walking through a minefield However, the prospect of high returns and future expansion makes frontier countries even more appealing to foreign investors Therefore, frontier markets might appear to be an interesting alternative for foreign investors because of the appearance of good signals in the financial market and the prospects of higher profits being generated from this market Despite its good potential, research on such markets is limited, especially when it comes to the effects of unconventional monetary policy of AEs on the financial market or real economy in a particular country or region To fill this gap, this study focuses the analysis on Vietnam which is a small open and frontier market economy transmitted to the market economy since the 1980’s The Vietnamese stocks market account for the highest proportion in the portfolio of frontier market indexes Among Asian countries, Vietnam may now exhibit similar traits to developing, open nations with an insufficient institutional structure and a developing equity market which should be considered by policymakers and foreign investors

Secondly, most studies focus on the global financial crisis and examine the impact of unconventional monetary policy during this period without considering or paying little attention to the epidemic crisis occurring on a large scale over the world from 2020 to the present If so, these studies only look at the individual impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on the stock market or specific sector but do not compare or consider these two major crises in the same analysis despite that over the past decade they have been the biggest crises with global impact The study might fill this gap by analyzing the phase from 2007 to

2022 The period of 16 years in case of international effect because this period will cover enough different stress market states in international economic conditions such as GFC (2008-2009), the change into policy normalization in the US (2014-2017), a slight difference in monetary policies in AEs during uncertain economic conditions (2018-2019) and the global pandemic crisis since the COVID-19 appeared at the end of 2019 until present, it will most fully reflect the stages of US use of UMP and the impact of those policies on Vietnam Studying two crises with large differences (financial crisis and health crisis) helps to better understand the positive impacts of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and real economy From there, the research results can provide policy implications that have practical value for Vietnam

Finally, despite the extensive literature on the spillover effects of the US’s UMP on emerging and developing economies, there is a lack of empirical evidence on how these effects vary across different time horizons and transmission channels There is a gap in understanding how the US’s UMP affects the financial markets and the real economy of

Vietnam, a frontier financial market and an open, small economy This research aims to fill this gap by studying the international effect of the US’s UMP on Vietnam in two steps

First, it examines the immediate impact of these policies on the financial markets of

Vietnam using event study techniques, which can capture the short-term reactions of asset prices and exchange rates to official US’s UMP announcements Second, it assesses the longer-lasting impact using a SVAR model, which can capture the dynamic interactions of macro-financial variables across countries This analysis could help us better understand the cross-border spillovers of the US’s UMP on Vietnam and the implications for monetary policy coordination

In summary, this study aims to contribute important empirical evidence on the impact of the US’s UMP on Vietnam, a country experiencing increasing economic globalization Additionally, the current Vietnamese stock market holds the largest share within the group of frontier markets in MSCI indices, presenting significant potential for high returns to investors The research provides an overall perspective on the impact of unconventional monetary policies from the United States on Vietnam, especially when

US’s UMP is transmitted through international channels, affecting Vietnam's GDP and inflation Finally, the study compares the differences in the effects of US’s UMP on

Vietnam during the global financial crisis and the recent COVID-19 pandemic These contributions are both substantial and significant for the research field

In Chapter 2, the research provides a detailed presentation of the relevant theoretical framework, which includes the Efficient Market Hypothesis, Taylor's Rule, Asset pricing by discounted cash flow model, Milton Friedman's money demand theory, Tobin's q theory, and the Mundell-Fleming-Dornbusch model The study analyzes the interconnections of these theories with the research problem Furthermore, the theories related to monetary policy, both conventional and unconventional, are also elaborated on, covering the tools, transmission mechanisms, and the distinctions between the two policies

In this chapter, the research conducts a comprehensive review of studies related to the impact of UMP policy on financial markets and the economy, both domestically and in terms of its spillover to other countries The literature review process focuses on two aspects: (i) the scope of the research and (ii) the research methods Finally, the study identifies gaps in previous research, thereby highlighting new focal points for this research.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Event study method

3.1.1.1 Introduction to event study method

In finance theory, companies' stock prices stand for all information accessible about those companies in the capital markets According to MacKinlay (1997), economists are regularly asked to quantify the consequences of an economic event on business value On the surface, this is a challenging assignment However, the event study method may readily develop a measure Given this fundamental principle, one can measure the event's influence on the firm's stock by measuring how a specific event alters a firm's prospects

ESM allows researchers to analyze how the price of an individual stock, or a portfolio, responds to the announcement of an event According to Cheng and Sun (2013) and Galloppo and Paimanova (2017), ESM can be conducted to investigate the stock market response to policy announcements By examining the price changes before and after the event, researchers can estimate the event's impact on the stock price and the market's perception of the event This can provide valuable insights for investors, regulators, and policymakers who must understand how markets react to specific events

The economic impact of an event is measured in return for what is known as an abnormal return The calculation of abnormal returns involves subtraction from the actual returns on the stocks of the returns that would have been achieved if the examined event had not occurred (expected returns) The typical returns must be approximated, even though the actual returns may be objectively seen Expected return models, widely utilized in other fields of finance research, are used for this purpose in the event study method The use of ESM is not only limited to AR and CAR for individual stocks but has been extended to research different sectors (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Lubys & Panda, 2021) Studying the influence of other sectors will help further analyze the industry's reaction to macro announcements, including monetary policy

According to Kaspereit (2021), all studies that appeared between 2009 to 2018, the total number of publications included in the analysis is 180, with 55 appearing in the Journal of Accounting Research (17.5% of all articles published in this journal during that period), 71 in the Journal of Finance (10.1%), and 54 in Management Science (3.0%) As a

3 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA result, the event-study design may be regarded as one of the most famous research methodologies in the disciplines of journals

In this study, the event study method is employed to examine the immediate responses of the Vietnamese financial market (represented by the stock market) and different sectors to announcements related to the implementation of unconventional monetary policy by the US The study examines these responses in two periods: the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic The event study method employed will address the first research objective and part of the third research objective

3.1.1.2 The steps of event study method

The process of conducting the research by the ESM will be carried out in these steps:

Step 1: Identify the research event

For ESM, the first step is to determine or research events Benninga (2014) suggests that an event is characterized as a moment when a business makes an announcement, or a significant market event occurs These events' landmarks are essential for studying and determining the data needed for collection

Within the scope of this research, research events are press releases and Fed announcements related to the use, expansion, or extended using of UMP tools in the GFC period and the COVID-19 pandemic period

Step 2: Determine the length of time for the event windows

According to Campbell et al (1997), after the first step in conducting an ESM is to define the event of interest, the second step determines the period during which the securities prices of the enterprises engaged in the event will be analyzed - the event window It is common practice to set the event window to be greater than the period of interest In other words, there is no time duration standard in the event study method for the length of time for the estimation window, event window, and post-event window frames Daily return data is popular as a standard in event research because of its accuracy and limited bias in results (Corrado, 2011)

Figure 3.1: Time lengths for window frames used in the event study method

The estimation window (sometimes called the control period) determines the expected behavior of the stock market factors El Ghoul et al (2023) showed that the estimation window measures all the parameters needed to estimate normal returns (the returns one would expect to have had if the event had not occurred) Differentiation between the estimation and event windows is critical for measuring the normal returns correctly According to Benninga (2014), the estimated window typically lasts 252 trading days (or one calendar year) However, this number of days may not always be present in the sample If not, you must decide if the quantity of observations you do have is enough to generate reliable conclusions Similarly, Corrado (2011) suggested that 250 days is chosen to roughly match the number of trade days in a year This study selects 250 days for the estimation window

The event window is frequently extended to multiple days, including at least the day of the announcement and the day after This is done to capture the price effects of announcements made after the stock market closes on the day of the announcement The period preceding or after the occurrence may also be essential and should be considered individually in the study Ferreira and Serra (2022) showed that if it is too long, it can be affected by disclosing other significant information, such as macroeconomic statistics If it is too limited, asset prices could not have enough time to integrate changed expectations appropriately

According to Lubys and Panda (2021), the cumulative abnormal returns are calculated in the following event window: 1 day before the announcement to capture the anticipation in the markets and two days after the event, which should capture the initial reaction (- 1; + 2) Galloppo and Paimanova (2017) suggested that the variable is the cumulative abnormal return, calculated in the following three event windows: (1) a one-day window (0; 0), i.e., the day of the announcement; (2) a two-day window (-1, 0), i.e., from day before the announcement and the announcement day (this case, we try to capture an anticipatory effect of announcement); and (3) five-day window (-1; +3), i.e from day -1 to day +3 of policy announcement Aùt-Sahalia et al (2012) used a five-day window, confirming the validity of results for alternative, smaller windows up to a minimum length of one day We also consider alternative reference time an imperfect substitute for increasing the study frequency Ricci (2015) focused on the following short event windows: 5-day (-1;+3), 3-day (-1;+1), and one-day (0;0) Võ and Đặng (2018) showed that the event window to consider market reactions is 11 days (5 days before and after the event) Based on the studies, this research will choose a maximum event window of 11 days, encompassing five days before and five days after the event date

Step 3: Determine AR and CAR (or AAR and CAAR)

Determine expected return or normal return

There are several different financial models that can be used to estimate the expected return of a stock

The mean-adjusted model calculates the stock's projected return based on the stock's historical average return over a certain period, adjusted for changes in market circumstances or the company's financial performance This model implies that the stock's future returns will be comparable to its past returns, with modifications for market or company-specific changes This model's formula is:

𝐸(𝑅 𝑖,𝑡 ) : is the expected return on stock i at time t

𝑅̅ 𝑖 : The average return of stocks i in the period of the estimate window

This model adjusts for market sensitivity As a result, it is adequate for occurrences that coincide with significant market changes For this method, the expected return is the same-day market return Thus, all equities have a level of return that anticipates the exact expectations, and there is no need to consider the estimation window

Rm,t : is the return on an appropriate market index at time t

❖ The market and risk-adjusted model or the market model

This model is based on a reference market's actual returns and the stock of the company's connection with the benchmark market It considers market risk, allowing different assets to exhibit different sensitivities to market movements (El Ghoul et al.,

2023) According to MacKinlay (1997); (Strong, 1992), El Ghoul et al (2023), Sorokina et al (2013), and Brooks (2019), the most popular anticipated return model is the market and risk-adjusted model The formula of this model is:

E(𝑅 𝑖,𝑡 ) : is the expected return on stock i at time t

Structural vector autoregressive model

3.1.2.1 Introduction to structural vector autoregressive model

SVAR is a multivariate, linear representation of a vector of observables on its lags Economists use SVAR to recover economic shocks from observables by enforcing a strict set of minimal assumptions acceptable to a broad range of models Besides, SVAR has long been considered the workshop in empirical macroeconomics to study the expected response of the model variables to a given one-time structural shock such as policy actions or unexpected changes in the economy (Kilian, 2013) The essence of SVAR is obtaining structural parameters and shocks based on observing the reduced form VAR developed by Sims (1980) SVAR allows for as many types of shocks as time series variables in the set by assuming that observable variables are endogenous In contrast, shocks are the impulses that move the system

The benchmark SVAR model has the following representation:

Equivalently, the model can be expressed in a more compact form such that:

Where 𝑌 𝑡 is a (n x 1) vector of n endogenous variables; 𝛤(𝐿) is a matrix-valued polynomial in a positive power of the lag operator L; and 𝜇t is a (n x 1) vector of structural error terms; ct is a (n x 1) vector of exogenous variables The variance-covariance matrix of the structural error term is typically normalized such that: 𝑬(𝝁 𝒕 𝝁 𝒕 ′ ) ≡ 𝜴 𝝁 = 𝑰 𝑲

We can estimate a reduced form equation (VAR) by multiplying equation (1) with inverse matrix 𝜞 (𝜞 -1 ), the equation is written below:

𝜞 𝟎 −𝟏 𝜞 𝟎 (𝑳)𝒀 𝒕 = 𝜞 𝟎 −𝟏 𝒖 𝒕 (3.10) This can be written as:

𝑨(𝑳)𝒀 𝒕 = 𝜺 𝒕 (𝟑 𝟏𝟏) where 𝐴𝐿 = 𝐼 − 𝐴 1 𝐿 − 𝐴 2 𝐿 2 − ⋯ − 𝐴 𝑝 𝐿 𝑝 denotes the autoregressive lag order polynomial; the reduced-form innovations are in general a weighted average structural shock 𝜇t such that: 𝜀 𝑡 = 𝛤 0 −1 𝑢 𝑡 and hence the variance of 𝜀 𝑡 is:

SVAR has been proven in the VAR literature to capture better the key features of small open economies than standard identification approaches

In this study, employing the SVAR model approach, the study will examine the responses of the Vietnamese real economy (represented by GDP growth and inflation variables) to shocks related to the US unconventional monetary policy (represented by the Federal Reserve's balance sheet) Additionally, the study will also examine the response of the real economy to UMP shocks in two periods: the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic This research methodology will address the second research objective and the remaining part of the third research objective

The SVAR model is used in this study to examine the effects of US UMP shocks on Vietnam's real economy based on the approach (Carrera & Ramírez-Rondán, 2020; Cushman & Zha, 1997; Li et al., 2010; Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021)

The model's variable selection and ordering is based on the worldwide transmission mechanism of the US’s UMP and Yildirim and Ivrendi (2021) research, in which the risk- taking channel and portfolio rebalancing channel serve as the main guiding concept for the selection of transmission channel variables This research develops a benchmark model to explain how changes in the US’s UMP were transferred to Vietnam in the short term via monetary transmission channels The theoretical basis of these transmission channels is explained by the Mundell-Fleming-Dornbusch when an expansionary domestic monetary policy results in an exchange rate depreciation in a world with flexible exchange rates This model demonstrates the impact of import prices on exchange rate fluctuations and their subsequent effect on global expenditures under conditions of perfect capital mobility The

CF and FOREX variables exemplify this phenomenon, while Tobin's q theory provides a theoretical framework for understanding the changing of SP

This study used a seven-variable SVAR model with an indicator of the US’s UMP and variables about domestic issues to assess the possible consequences of the US’s UMP

It is divided into two categories as follows:

• Group 1: The indicator of the US’s UMP and international transmission channels to Vietnam

• Group 2: Domestic variable: this group will exhibit five indicators from the Vietnamese economy, including an index of equity prices, a measure of market interest rate, a nominal bilateral exchange rate, and a measure of real economy such as output and inflation

The vector of endogenous variables is as follows:

In which UMP (a proxy for the US’s UMP), VIX (the VIX index), CF (capital inflows to Vietnam), SP (stock price), IRR (interest rate), FOREX (exchange rate), GDP (gross domestic product), and CPI (inflation) are all present This work presents a short-term limit on contemporaneous structural factors based on the Cholesky decomposition, allowing acceptable economic structures to be produced This study will also derive the impulse response functions and variance decomposition from SVAR by assuming sequential effects This model assumes that the United States' UMP significantly impacts macro-financial circumstances in Vietnam In contrast, the impact of local economic conditions on global conditions is insignificant The matrix of short-term restrictions on the equation has the following representation:

UMP t VIX t CF t SP t IRR t FOREX t GDP t CPI t

UMP t VIX t CF t SP t IRR t FOREX t GDP t CPI t e e e e e e e e

Equations arising from these restrictions can be presented as follows:

Overall, the matrix above summarizes the identification strategy For example, the study assumes that the US’s UMP impacts capital flows in Vietnam contemporaneously The capital flows, as well as other macroeconomic factors However, it has no immediate influence on the UMP in the United States This assumption places a concurrent zero restriction on the US block (a 12 =a 13 = = a 18 =0), which is frequently utilized in the SVAR-based literature (see, e.g., (Anaya et al., 2017; Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021))

3.1.2.3 Research variables a Proxy variable for the US’s unconventional monetary policy

Although early studies used event study analysis to concentrate on the UMP announcement impacts, especially using QE announcements and operations, concentrating on international spillover effects on the rest of the world with time lag needs other suitable measures Recent studies evaluated the impacts of the US’s UMP by using the Fed's balance sheet and interest rate spreads as a measure for the UMP instruments (Anaya et al., 2017; Buch et al., 2019; Gambacorta et al., 2014) In November 2008, when the Federal Fund Rate hit the zero lower bound, and Fed declared QE, the Fed effectively transitioned its monetary policy variable from the Federal funds rate to the size of its balance sheet (Belke & Klose, 2013) In contrast to the pre-crisis era, assessing monetary policy by looking at a single interest rate is no longer possible In general, interest rates were replaced as the primary tool for policymaking by central bank balance sheets (Gambacorta et al.,

2014) In line with the recent literature, the US’s UMP is proxied by total assets Fed’s balance sheets in this study b Proxy variables for the transmission channel

The VIX index measures the degree of market volatility and uncertainty (Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019), and it represents risk aversion that captures the US’s UMP risk- taking channel The literature provided plenty of proof regarding how US monetary policy, whether conventional or unconventional, affects VIX They showed that the VIX indicator changes depending on whether US monetary policy is expanded or restrictive For example, an expansion of the US monetary policy leads to a decrease in the VIX index (Anaya et al., 2017; Bekaert et al., 2013; Bruno & Shin, 2015; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Tillmann, 2016)

As a result, US monetary policy encourages market players to take risks, boosting portfolio transfers to other countries and raising the values of foreign assets (such as stocks and bonds) and the value of home currencies compared to the US dollar Rising risk aversion causes contractionary effects on emerging countries, declining GDP, and prices This aligns with the theory that growing risk aversion causes capital to leave emerging countries (Tillmann, 2017) Based on the majority of the literature mentioned above that showed strong co-movement between measures of the US monetary policy stance and the VIX index, the study hypothesized that an expansionary monetary policy in the US decreases risk aversion (the VIX index), that is, increases risk appetite, and lessens uncertainty in financial markets, particularly in stock markets However, Anaya et al (2017) also stressed that it is theoretically feasible for UMP measures to increase volatility by increasing uncertainty about the direction of future monetary policy

For these reasons, this research chooses the VIX index proxy for risk-taking channels to transmit the US’s UMP to the Vietnamese real economy

Rey (2016) proposed that the monetary policies of the US Federal Reserve are conveyed to the financial circumstances of EMEs via foreign capital flows Aside from the risk-taking channel, the portfolio rebalancing channel plays a significant role in the worldwide transmission of the US's UMP to the rest of the globe This channel claims that the UMP in the United States encourages investors to take on greater risk and rearrange their portfolios This shift in investors' risk-taking tendencies allows capital to flow into other countries, spreading the US's UMP to the financial markets of those countries Stock prices, interest rates, and exchange rates are significantly impacted by portfolio inflows brought on by US monetary policy and output and inflation in receiving countries This study uses foreign portfolio flow to Vietnam proxy for portfolio rebalancing channel, which is one of the key transmission channels of the US’s UMP international spillover effects c Proxy variables for domestic macroeconomic factors

The selection of domestic macroeconomic variables in the SVAR model was mainly chosen based on the theoretical framework of the monetary policy transmission mechanism and the approach (Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021) Specifically, Mishkin (1995) identified key transmission channels like the impact of asset prices, the interest rate, and the exchange rate Therefore, this study collects the stock index, market interest rate, and nominal exchange rate in Vietnam proxy for the asset price, interest rate, and exchange-rate channels, respectively Specifically, in this research, lending interest rate is used instead of policy rate or interbank rate because lending interest rates tend to exhibit greater stability compared to interbank and policy interest rates This stability arises from their resilience against short-term market fluctuations and abrupt decisions made by the State Bank of Vietnam (Nguyen et al., 2021) In addition, lending interest rates play a significant role in influencing various facets of the economy, including inflation, economic growth, exchange rates, balance of payments, and the behavior and psychology of investors (Nguyen, 2015) Asset price can be represented by stock price in Vietnam due to the lack of information about other assets such as household price Some studies indicate that stock prices are commonly employed as a standard for assessing the returns and risks associated with various assets, including bonds, derivatives, real estate, and others Consequently, stock prices serve as a universal reference point for comparing the valuations of diverse assets (Packer, 2007) Besides, stock prices are responsive to a range of factors influencing asset valuations, including interest rates, inflation, exchange rates, risk premiums, dividends, earnings, and more Hence, stock prices can encapsulate the impact of these elements on asset prices d Proxy variables for the real economy

The real economy is concerned with creating, purchasing, and moving commodities and services within an economy It contrasts with the financial economy, which focuses only on exchanging money and other financial assets that reflect ownership of or claims to ownership of goods and services from the real economy Since the term "real economy" applies to all real or non-financial components, real variables can be used to model the real economy Real factors are, therefore, wages, output, employment, etc In many empirical literature, real economic activities can be proxied by real gross domestic product (Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019), real output growth such as gross domestic product, industrial production, and consumer price index (Anaya et al., 2017); real GDP growth and the CPI inflation rate (Haitsma et al., 2016); Real GDP growth and CPI inflation rate (Chen et al.,

2017), etc Therefore, this study collects the GDP growth rate and price index proxy for the real economy in Vietnam

Table 3.1: Expected correlations between variables

The variable represents the total assets of the Fed’s balance sheet Higher Fed’s total asset stimulates real variables in recipient countries (Anaya et al., 2017; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019)

The variable represents an option-implied volatility index or risk aversion An expansionary of the US’s UMP leads to a decrease in the VIX index (Anaya et al., 2017; Bekaert et al., 2013; Bruno & Shin, 2015; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Tillmann,

2016), resulting in rising capital inflows and increasing in the real economy

The variable representing the foreign portfolio flows to Vietnam Higher portfolio inflows stimulate real production growth and price index (Anaya et al., 2017; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019)

The variable represents the stock index in Vietnam Higher stock prices result in greater output (Mishkin, 1995)

Variable representing market interest rate in Vietnam A higher interest rate restricts total output (Mishkin, 1995)

A variable representing the Vietnam Exchange rate An appreciation of the domestic currency restricts total output (Mishkin, 1995)

The detailed research procedures to estimate the SVAR model are presented as follows:

The model is proposed based on economic theories and literature reviews to test the research hypothesis

• Step 2: Check the unit root for data series

RESEARCH DATA

Data for ESM

(i) Event dates related to the US’s UMP announcements during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic These data are collected directly from the Fed's website and research by (Bowman et al., 2015) and (Clarida et al., 2021)

The event dates used in this study include information related to the use of UMP policy, including (i) liquidity provision, (2) asset purchases, and (3) forward guidance as officially announced by the Fed or its representative through Fed/FOMC meetings/announcements

Detailed statistics for the research event dates are detailed in Table 3.2, Table 3.3, and Appendix 3

Table 3.2: Event dates during the global financial crisis period

Events US day Vietnamese day Note

4 1/28/2009 1/29/2009 Vietnamese Lunar New Year holiday

Source: Fed & Bowman et al (2015)

During the period of GFC, there were 22 event dates to test the reaction of the Vietnamese stock market Due to the time zone difference between the two countries, the event dates of Vietnam are determined to be adjacent trading days of the Vietnam market If the Fed's announcement date is Friday in the US, the event date in Vietnam will be the second consecutive week (2 working days away from the US announcement date (event

9 th ) If it falls on a public holiday and weekend, the event date in Vietnam will be the next trading day after the holiday (event 15 th ) The 4 th event date was removed due to coinciding with the Vietnamese Lunar New Year holiday Finally, after considering the relevant facts, the study will use 21 event dates for this period

Table 3.3: Event dates during the COVID-19 pandemic period

Events US day Vietnamese day Note

Source: Fed and Clarida et al (2021)

Like the above, the event dates selected in COVID-19 are related to the US’s UMP tools For this period, the study will use 14 event dates

(ii) Data on stock prices adjusted for the influence of business-related events such as dividends, issuing more shares , and VNindex These data are collected from the HOSE

To assess the reaction of the Vietnamese stock market to announcements related to the US's UMP This study will focus on analyzing the response of the return on the market portfolio and stock portfolio in different sectors The stocks are selected in the same sectors based on the GICS sub-sector This study focuses on stocks listed on HOSE, a market where many listed companies are concentrated, and the total capitalization of the listed companies accounts for the main proportion of the Vietnamese stock market The details of GICS classification standards are presented in Appendix 1

When calculating the abnormal returns of stocks, 250 trading observations are required to determine abnormal returns, so the stocks selected in the studied events must have traded at least 250 trading days before the event date The number of specific stocks and event dates in the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic periods are shown in Appendix 2.

Data for SVAR model

Databases of monetary policy transmission topics usually include macroeconomic factors such as interest rate, exchange rate, money supply, GDP, inflation, asset prices, etc Although these data are typically collected from variously reliable sources such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, Asia Regional Integration Center (ARIC), Bank for International Settlements (BIS), etc., using such secondary data sources may have some issues as follows: Firstly, macroeconomic data might be inaccurate in some level because they represent information about the entire economy with a variety of sectors and elements, making it susceptible to affected by statistical processing, time, etc

Secondly, most studies use historical data that has not been updated to reflect the state of the economy at the time they were conducted, which can cause study findings to be applied to reality later than expected Finally, some data may be missed because the statistical systems in developing nations are still relatively weak, making it challenging to collect historical data (Nguyễn, 2016)

This study is no exception when it comes to using secondary data Specifically, with monthly data, this study examines the worldwide spillover effects of the United States' UMP on the Vietnamese economy, concentrating on the real economy The data span from January 2007 to April 2022, including total assets Fed’s balance sheets (CBB), VIX index (VIX), foreign portfolio investment flows to Vietnam (CF), Vietnam’s stock price (SP), the market interest rate in Vietnam (IRR), the nominal exchange rate of USD/VND (FOREX), Vietnam output (GDP), and Vietnam inflation (CPI) All data are collected primarily from IMF and HOSE The VIX index is compiled in the CBOE and the Fed’s balance sheet in the Federal Reserve Bank This study analyzed the period of 16 years in case of international effect because this period will cover enough different stress market states in global economic conditions such as GFC (2008-2009), the European debt crisis (2010-

2013), the change into policy normalization in the US (2014-2017), a slight difference in monetary policies in AEs during uncertain economic conditions (2018-2019) and the global pandemic crisis since the COVID-19 appeared at the end of 2019 until present It will most fully reflect the effects of the US’s UMP over different periods, especially during the GFC and pandemic crisis, resulting in significant economic downturn following the large-scale implementation of a series of UMPs in the US during these periods

Table 3.4 below contains further information on the variables used in the SVAR model

Table 3.4: Description of variables and source of data

Unconventional monetary policy of the US CBB

Total assets of central banks in the US (% change)

Option-implied volatility index VIX Percentage change in VIX index CBOE

The logarithm of foreign portfolio investment inflows to Vietnam

Vietnam stock index SP Stock market return of

Vietnam's market interest rate IRR Percentage change in market lending rate (%) IMF-IFS Vietnam Exchange rate FOREX

Logarithm of the nominal exchange rate of Vietnam dong against the US dollar

Vietnam output GDP GDP growth rate of

Vietnam inflation CPI Percentage change in consumer price index (%) IMF-IFS

RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

To elucidate the research questions presented in the preceding section, this part of the study proposes a research hypothesis These hypotheses pertain to the influence of the US’s UMP on both the financial market and the real economy Specifically, the focus is on the repercussions of these policies during periods of crisis

Hypothesis 1: Vietnamese financial market responds positively to announcements related to the US's UMP in the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic period

To make this first research hypothesis more specific, the study will consider two sub-hypotheses Hypothesis 1.1 examines the instant response of the entire stock market, while Hypothesis 1.2 considers the reactions of different sectors to US’s UMP announcements The most important theoretical basis for these hypotheses is the Efficient Market Hypothesis In addition to Tobin’s q theory and the discounted cash flow theory, which explain the increase in asset prices when interest rates decrease These hypotheses are proposed based on the first research question

Hypothesis 1.1: The Vietnamese stock market responds positively to announcements related to the US's UMP in the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic period

The appearance of ARs and CARs with the announcements is based on the theory of the Semi-strong form of EMH; specifically, the market will react immediately to the announcement In this case, the announcements about the US’s UMP to support the economy in times of crisis are positive news for the market Võ and Đặng (2018) also reveal that the Vietnamese stock market responds to information about the monetary policies of the United States

Hypothesis 1.2: The different sectors reacted positively to announcements related to the

On the stock market, listed companies operate in different sectors 8 and fields Each sector has its characteristics of operations and business, when new information appears in the market, stock prices of sectors will react differently Defensive sectors such as consumer staples and healthcare usually operate stably during crisis periods Material and industrial sectors will benefit when the economy recovers, while during a global financial crisis, the financial sector is the most negatively affected In the research conducted by (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Lubys & Panda, 2021), the results also indicate that the reactions of various sectors differ in response to the published information However, in Vietnam, there is limited research on the reactions of sectors to the released data

Hypothesis 2: The US’s UMP positively affects the real economy of Vietnam in the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic period

This hypothesis is built based on Taylor’s rule for monetary policy operation, where a decrease in interest rates will stimulate investment and consumption activities, thereby promoting economic growth and affecting inflation The money demand theory of Friedman, Tobin’s q, and the MFD model also explain the impact of interest rates on factors such as capital flows, asset prices, exchange rates, etc., which in turn affect GDP and CPI

In addition, a study by Anaya et al (2017) showed that portfolio flows from the US to EMEs are dramatically increased by an expansionary policy shock, accompanied by a durable movement in fundamental and financial variables in the receiving countries Besides, a study in the Asian and Pacific region also showed similar evidence Vietnam is both a small, open economy and belongs to the group of frontier markets; it also takes a few years to upgrade to the emerging market level from the current frontier market classification The US’s UMP might significantly affect the Vietnamese economy, as previous studies about EMEs and other Asian developing countries show This hypothesis is based on the second research question

Hypothesis 3 : There are differences in the reaction of the Vietnamese financial market and real economy related to the US’s UMP during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic

This hypothesis is derived from the third research question However, due to the scope of the research subjects and the research method, this hypothesis is divided into sub-

8 Different sectors are divided according to the criteria and classification method of GICS Currently, the stocks of listed companies on the HOSE are divided into 11 sectors Details about these sectors are presented in Appendix 1

Hypotheses, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 These hypotheses respectively examine the differences in the impact of the US’s UMP on the entire stock market, on the sectors, and on the indicators of the real economy

Hypothesis 3.1 : There are differences in the reaction of the Vietnamese stock market to announcements related to the US’s UMP during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic

The global financial crisis originated in developed countries, specifically the US, then spread to other countries To support the economy, the US implemented UMP in different stages, which lasted from 2008 to 2013 While the COVID-19 epidemic related to the health sector caused countries to blockade, the government UMP books in this period were implemented continuously and without limitation However, this period of the US’s UMP only lasts from 3/2020 to 9/2020

Hypothesis 3.2: There are differences between sectors with announcements related to the

US’s UMP during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic period

As mentioned above, different sectors have their characteristics, and the US implementation of UMP during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic is also different These issues led to varying responses across sectors in the two periods

Hypothesis 3.3: Vietnam’s real economy responds more strongly to the shock of the US’s UMP during COVID-19 than the previous global financial crisis

Although not concentrating on the real economy or comparing crises in the past, these studies indicated that the response to the impact of COVID-19 is different for each country or group of countries (Liu et al., 2020; Sansa, 2020; Yilmazkuday, 2023; Zeren & Hizarci, 2020) However, there is still evidence that the interventions via unconventional tools during COVID-19 are higher when compared to earlier interventions made during the Great Recession (Cortes et al., 2022; Rebucci et al., 2022) Although there is no consensus on evidence that definitively states that the effects of the US’s UMP during COVID-19 are higher or smaller than its impacts in the GFC period, in comparison to prior crisis periods, some research implies that EMEs are more vulnerable to large-scale interventions (the COVID-19 QE announcements), whether domestic or foreign Similarly, the impact of US economic policy and the fluctuations in the world's economic policy significantly impact the Vietnamese market Thus, during the COVID-19 era, the real economy of Vietnam responded to the US’s UMP shocks more strongly than it did to the previous global financial crisis.

Based on macroeconomic theories as well as models that have been verified by empirical research This study investigates the international spillover effects of the US's UMP on the Vietnamese financial market and economy In this chapter, the analysis details the steps taken for the event study method and the research questions and hypotheses The study employed two research methods to align with distinct aims

First, the event study method examines the impact of the US’s UMP announcements on the Vietnamese stock market as a whole and in two periods: the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 epidemic The data used for the study included US’s UMP announcements by the Fed and research by (Bowman et al., 2015) and (Clarida et al., 2021) data Stock prices and Vnindex are collected from the HOSE

Second, the research uses SVAR with short-term restrictions to test the response of

Vietnam output and inflation to UMP shocks from the US, with the support of international and domestic transmission channels The data in the model are collected from reliable sources, such as IMF, CBOE, HOSE, etc Both research procedures and testing hypotheses are also clearly suggested in this chapter The next chapter will use the models and variables outlined in this part for experimental research.

UNITED STATES’ UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY

Federal Funds Rate in the US from 2007 to 2022

As mentioned above, FFR is the primary instrument of monetary policy (detailed breakdown of the FFR during the 2007-2022 period is presented in the Appendix 5)

According to (Wells, 2021), the 2008 financial crisis was the most severe financial calamity to hit the United States since the Great Depression It pulled down some of the country's largest and oldest financial institutions, as well as bringing others close to failure before the government intervened to save them During this period, the Fed was compelled to continuously adjust the FFR to bolster its economy

Table 4.1: FFR adjustments during the Global Financial Crisis

FOMC Meeting Date Rate Change (bps) Federal Funds Rate

Data from Table 4.1 indicates that during the GFC in August 2007, the US initiated a 50-basis-point cut to the target interest rate, bringing it down to 4.75% However, in response to the crisis's economic repercussions, the Fed continued to lower interest rates, making 10 adjustments over a period of slightly more than a year In October 2008, the Fed coordinated a rate decrease with other major central banks; and in December 2008, it became the first major central bank to reduce its target short-term interest rate to zero, where it would remain for the next seven years This marked the first time in history that the FFR had been maintained at such an exceptionally low level The first-rate hike occurred in December 2015, under former Fed Chair Janet Yellen, who currently serves as Treasury Secretary under the Biden administration

In 2019, the United States and China were at odds over trade—a so-called "trade war"—and the Fed was afraid that the battle might hurt the economy and raise unemployment rates Three moderate rate reductions in the second half of 2019 had a favorable impact on the economy (Tepper & Adams, 2024) While the economy was theoretically expanding again by May 2020, following the shortest recession on record, the effects from the economic measures to deal with the Covid-19 outbreak Once again, during this period, the Fed was compelled to adjust the FFR to near zero in order to bolster the economy against the adverse effects of COVID-19

Table 4.2: FFR adjustments during the COVID-19 pandemic

FOMC Meeting Date Rate Change (bps) Federal Funds Rate

Table 4.2 shows that In March 2020, the Fed issued two massive rate cuts during unplanned emergency sessions, reducing the FFR range to zero to 0.25% Within weeks, the Covid-19 epidemic had spread over the globe Public health authorities throughout the world have urged that governments enforce lockdowns to halt the virus's spread and reduce hospital caseloads Approximately 20.5 million jobs would be lost in April 2020 alone, with the unemployment rate rising to 14.7% (Tepper & Adams, 2024) As recently as the first quarter of 2022, the Federal Reserve kept the federal funds rate close to zero When the Fed decided it was time to address inflation, it moved quickly This has helped curb red-hot inflation rates that were eroding the purchasing power of ordinary Americans

According to Tepper and Adams (2024), after decreasing interest rates to zero, the Fed began executing a new style of monetary policy called quantitative easing, or QE Unable to lower rates any further, it began purchasing billions of dollars in bonds to boost the economy and put Americans back to work Many have still not healed and never will.

Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programs from 2007 to 2022

According to (Fed, 2024), the Federal Reserve has a huge balance sheet with several separate assets and liabilities The Federal Reserve's balance sheet provides a wealth of information regarding the size and extent of its operations For decades, market players have closely monitored the growth of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet in order to gain a better understanding of critical facts about monetary policy execution In recent years, the creation and deployment of a number of new lending facilities to address the financial crisis has both increased the complexity of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet and led to greater public interest in it

After decreasing interest rates to zero, the Fed began executing a new style of monetary policy called quantitative easing, or QE Unable to lower rates any further, it began purchasing billions of dollars in bonds to boost the economy and put Americans back to work Many have still not healed and never will (Tepper & Adams, 2024) In the period between the two crises, immediately after lowering interest rates to near zero, the Fed quickly purchased a large number of securities in the market, which caused the Fed's balance sheet to grow very rapidly, almost vertically (Figure 4.1)

Figure 4.1: Fed total assets from 2007 to 2022

In late 2008, the Fed launched its effort by purchasing $100 billion in Fannie and Freddie debt, as well as $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by the two businesses This was not just an effort to rekindle demand for the assets and help the collapsing housing market, but also a signal that the Fed would continue to assist growth in creative ways even when it could no longer lower short-term interest rates

When the economy continued to struggle in early 2009, the Fed initiated an experiment in monetary stimulation known as "quantitative easing," purchasing mortgage securities and later Treasury bonds in an attempt to lower long-term interest rates and combat the Great Recession The initial round, dubbed as QE1, would include $1.75 trillion in financial asset purchases, conveying a message that the Fed will not allow the economy to stagnate The Fed pursued QE2 and QE3 in 2010 and 2012, respectively, finally growing its balance sheet to more than $4.5 trillion in 2015, over five times its pre crisis peak

Building on the lessons of the GFC, the Fed resumed quantitative easing in response to the economic downturn triggered by the Covid-19 epidemic Policymakers outlined plans for quantitative easing in March 2020—but without a dollar or time restriction According to Wessel (2021), in reaction to the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve reduced short-term interest rates to zero on March 15, 2020,

COVID-19 period and resumed large-scale asset purchases Between June 2020 and October 2021, the Fed purchased $80 billion in Treasury securities and $40 billion in agency MBS every month

As the economy recovered in late 2021, Fed officials began to slow—or taper—the pace of their bond purchases The Fed eventually agreed to a monthly purchase rate of $120 billion, which included $80 billion in Treasury notes and $40 billion in MBS It increased its balance sheet by a total of $4.6 trillion over two years, until March 2022

The Fed has been buying $120 billion worth of securities every month and has accumulated a total stock of $2.6 trillion in mortgage-backed securities (implicitly guaranteed by the US government) and $5.5 trillion in US Treasury securities (Wessel,

2021) The Fed total asset until March 2024 is more than $8.1 trillion

The Fed's pandemic QE plan's unrestricted nature stood out from the financial crisis version the most Market participants became comfortable with this new method following three rounds of QE during the financial crisis, which allowed the Fed freedom to keep acquiring assets for as long as necessary (Jackson, 2021).

Forward guidance from 2007 to 2022

Aside from the rate decrease, the moves we took at the December 2008 meeting previewed what would become the FOMC's two principal methods to easing policy when short-term rates could not go much lower: Forward guidance and large-scale security purchases (Bernanke, 2022) According to Bowman (2022), forward guidance is an official FOMC message that signals to the public the expected future course of monetary policy

According to Bernanke (2013), during the GFC, the Fed send messages: After starting in December 2008 that the FFR should continue around zero for "some time," the FOMC revised the phrasing in March 2009 to "an extended period." However, such phrasing did not clearly reflect the Committee's aims In August 2011, the Committee added a precise time frame to its guidelines, noting that conditions would likely justify keeping the federal funds rate target around zero at least until mid-2013 Besides the forward guidance policy directions on maintaining interest rates near zero From November

2008 to June 2012, the FOMC announced or extended a series of asset purchase programs, each of which specified the estimated amounts of assets to be bought under the program

The FOMC's forward guidance during the pandemic followed the trend of greater, and frequently more specific, guidance Starting in September 2020, the Committee stated

9 Federal Reserve's Forward Guidance announcements during the two phases are outlined in the Appendix 3 that it would not raise the funds rate from its near-zero level until "labor market conditions have reached levels consistent with the Committee's assessment of maximum employment and inflation has risen to 2 percent and is on track to moderately exceed 2 percent for some time (Bernanke, 2022)

In addition to the unconventional monetary policy tools mentioned above, the Fed also employed a combination of other programs These included:

Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF): This was a lending program established by the Fed to inject liquidity into specific sectors of the financial system, such as the commercial paper market

Main Street Lending Program (MSLP): This program was designed to provide financial support to small and medium-sized businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL MARKET AND ECONOMY IN

Overview of the financial market in Vietnam from 2000 to 2022

4.2.1.1 Market size during the period from 2000 to 2022

As outlined in the scope of the study presented in Chapter 1, the financial market under analysis is the stock market, primarily represented by the equity market Since its official operation in 2000, the stock market in Vietnam has achieved various positive outcomes It has also been subject to multiple impacts, notably during the GFC and the recent COVID-19 pandemic

Figure 4.2: The number of listed companies on the HOSE during the period from

Figure 4.2 illustrates the number of listed companies on the HOSE from 2000 to

2022 In the initial years of the market formation, the number of listed companies was modest, with only about 17 listing companies by the end of 2005 Transitioning into the period from 2006 onwards, the number of listed companies on the HOSE experienced a remarkable increase The number of newly listed companies surged rapidly from 2006 to

2011 This period coincided with the global financial crisis that significantly impacted the Vietnamese stock market, extending until 2013, contributing to a reduction in the number of new listings from 2012 to 2014 Post-2015, following the fundamental conclusion of the global financial crisis, the number of newly listed companies gradually recovered However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 had a considerable impact on the stock market, leading companies to reconsider listing, resulting in a decrease in the number of new listings from 2019 to 2022

Number of listed company Accumulated number

Figure 4.3: The market capitalization during the period from 2000 to 2022

Like the number of listed companies from 2000 to 2022, the stock market's capitalization during this period, especially during the two global financial crises and the COVID-19 pandemic, also underwent significant changes Figure 4.3 illustrates the growth of market capitalization during 2006 when it increased dramatically from around 7,390 billion VND in 2005 to 147,967 billion VND, nearly twenty times in just one year The market capitalization continued to rise sharply in 2007 to 364,425 billion VND but declined to only 169,346 billion VND in 2008 From 2009 to 2011, the market was still unstable as the market capitalization experienced various fluctuations despite a significant increase in the number of listed companies (Figure 4.2) From 2012 onwards, the market gradually stabilized, and the market capitalization increased yearly However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the market saw significant volatility in the early months of 2020 Despite this, by the end of the year, market capitalization had rebounded compared to 2019 (increasing by approximately 24.5%) Market capitalization experienced a remarkable increase in 2021 but decreased sharply in 2022

4.2.1.2 Fluctuations in the stock market during the period from 2000 to 2022

Like the market size, from 2000 to 2022, the Vietnamese stock market has also undergone significant fluctuations There were stages when market indices and trading volumes increased rapidly, but in many periods, the market became subdued, especially during times of crisis

Figure 4.4: VNINDEX and the total trading volume during the period from 2000 to 2022

Figure 4.4 shows that the Vietnamese stock market has undergone various fluctuations since its start in 2000, with the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic being the most volatile stages More detailed insights into the fluctuations during crisis periods are presented in Figure 4.5 and Figure 4.6

Figure 4.5: VNINDEX and trading volume during the global financial crisis period

The GFC originated in the United States in mid-2007 when financial institutions faced difficulty recovering mortgage-backed loans This crisis quickly spread to developed countries like the UK, France, and Spain Its pinnacle was the bankruptcy declaration of the

US investment bank Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 In that context, the Vietnamese stock market also experienced significant impacts Figure 4.5 illustrates that during this period, the stock market underwent a sharp decline, with the VNINDEX plummeting from over 1,100 points at the beginning of 2008 to a continuous decrease, reaching a low of 235.5 points on February 24, 2009 The stock market then showed signs of recovery, but by the end of 2013, the market index only reached 504 points Despite the prolonged support policies from countries worldwide and Vietnam during this period, the stock market could not fully recover to the pre-crisis level

Figure 4.6: VNINDEX and trading volume during the COVID-19 pandemic

Once again, significant global disruptions occurred in December 2019 when a new virus strain appeared in Wuhan, China, rapidly spreading worldwide The swift and uncontained transmission and a lack of effective prevention and treatment prompted countries worldwide to implement lockdowns and social distancing measures to curb the spread The economies of many nations virtually came to a standstill Consequently, the

Trading Volume VNINDEX global financial markets were not immune to the severe impacts of the pandemic As

(Figure 4.6) shows, in Vietnam, the stock market underwent a sharp decline at once after the Lunar New Year in 2020 The VNINDEX, starting at 991.46 points on January 22,

2020, dropped to 659.21 points on March 24, 2020 (a decrease of 33.51%) However, the market began to recover thanks to domestic and international economic support policies and programs In Vietnam, the VNINDEX quickly surpassed pre-COVID-19 levels.

Overview of Vietnamese economy from 2000 to 2022

4.2.2.1 Economic growth of Vietnam from 2000 to 2022

Since the beginning of economic reforms in the late 1980s, the Vietnamese economy has progressively integrated into regional and global networks, achieving notable accomplishments Vietnam officially joined the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 1995, the Asia-Europe Economic Forum, became a member of APEC in 1998, and formally acceded to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2007 Participation in these organizations and forums has brought significant opportunities and challenges to Vietnam's economy in the later years

Figure 4.7: GDP growth of Vietnam from 2000 to 2022

Figure 4.7 illustrates Vietnam's GDP growth fluctuations from 2000 to 2022, especially during crises From 2000 to 2007, GDP growth consistently remained high, averaging around 7% per year, with a notable peak of 7.8% in 2004 However, when the

9.0% world plunged into the financial crisis, Vietnam's economy was not immune to adverse impacts, experiencing a decline in GDP growth from 7.1% in 2007 to only 5.7% in 2008 In this period, GDP growth in 2012 reached its lowest point at 5.2%, the lowest in the preceding decade Following the financial crisis, Vietnam's GDP growth gradually improved, notably with higher growth in the years following 2014 The growth rate in these years was equivalent to before the financial crisis However, once again, with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Vietnam's GDP growth in 2020 decreased to only 2.9% and further to 2.6% in 2021 These figures stand for the lowest growth rates in 20 years There was a partial recovery in GDP growth in 2022, reaching an impressive 8.02%

In summary, the growth results over the years, as presented above, clearly write down that Vietnam has benefited significantly from economic integration However, the global financial crises and the COVID-19 pandemic have affected Vietnam's economy

4.2.2.2 Inflation in Vietnam during the period from 2000 to 2022

In addition to the economic growth achievements, Vietnam's inflation from 2000 to

2022 has also experienced various fluctuations, especially during the global financial crisis.

Figure 4.8: Inflation in Vietnam from 2000 to 2022

Figure 4.8 illustrates the inflation dynamics in Vietnam from 2000 to 2022 In the early years of the 21st century, inflation was kept at a low level, with even a deflation

25.0% phenomenon in 2000 and 2001 However, inflation then increased rapidly from 2004 to

2007, rising from 3.8% in 2002 to 8.3% in 2007 This period also marked Vietnam's high economic growth (Figure 4.7) In 2008, the global financial crisis had an apparent effect on the Vietnamese economy, with a sharp decline in GDP growth accompanied by inflation reaching two-digit figures, reaching 23.1% This was the highest level in over 20 years From 2008 to 2013, inflation remained high, although it experienced a slight decrease in some years High inflation was influenced by fiscal and monetary policies aimed at supporting the economy to overcome the negative impacts of the crisis In the later years, Vietnam managed to control inflation below 3.5% per year, even during the COVID-19 pandemic Inflation remained around the 3% threshold, reaching only 1.8% in 2021

In summary, it can be seen that the inflation index in Vietnam has undergone significant fluctuations during the two periods of the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic During the financial crisis, inflation increased significantly, reaching double-digit figures, while during the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation was controlled and maintained below the target set by the National Assembly.

RESEARCH RESULTS FROM ESM

The reaction of the market to the US’s UMP announcement

4.3.1.1 Abnormal average return of the market

The AAR results of the market portfolio on the event date and the days around the event date in different event windows are presented in Table 4.3 In this table, the study shows the results of abnormal average returns (AAR) according to the market and risk- adjusted model (Formula 3.4) with the non-parametric test (using the Patell Test)

Table 4.3: The AAR of the market around the US’s UMP event dates

Date GFC period COVID-19 period Two periods

Source: calculated from research data

The results of Table 4.3 show that the Vietnamese stock market had a positive response to all observations of the US’s UMP event in both periods, as shown in the AAR around the event date Specifically, on the days before the event date from -5 to -1, the market appeared AAR fluctuated around -0.16% to 0.24%; on most observation days, the AAR values are statistically significant at the 1% significance level, except for the days -5 and -4 during the COVID-19 pandemic period The market's positive ARR was kept for the following days (days +1 and +2), and then the AAR turned negative for the following days The results also show that on the day of the UMP event, the market responded most positively with an ARR of 0.19% and statistically significant at 1% However, when looking at each stage of GFC and COVID-19, the ARR in these two stages has some differences

During the GFC period, the market changed when the US’s UMP announcement was released; this is shown by the fact that on the day that UMP was announced (day 0), the market was positive and statistically significant AAR with a 1% significance Meanwhile, the AAR is negative the days before the event date (days -1 and -2) After the UMP event day, the market's uptrend continued to keep until +4 The positive AAR result is statistically significant at a 1% significance level on days +2 and +4; the highest AAR value after the event date is on day +4

During the COVID-19 pandemic period, like the GFC period, the market showed a discernible positive (AAR is 0.19%) response to the announcement information on the event date This positive reaction was clear at the AAR level and reached statistical significance at the 1% confidence level Nevertheless, throughout this period, the market proved more pronounced reactions before the US’s UMP official announcement This is illustrated by the sustained positive AAR from the day close to the event date (date - 1) to the day just before the official announcement (-5 days) After the event date, the positive AAR is still consistent until +2 This can be attributed to the extensive and frequent US

UMP implementation during this period Notably, in the latter part of March 2020, the U.S consistently executed UMP on a large scale On 3/23/2020, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced its intention to continue purchasing Treasury securities and agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) "in the amounts needed." Additionally, it expanded its purchases to include the agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) for the first time Detailed information about the use of US’s UMP is disclosed on the event dates in both GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic periods and is presented in

When combining all observations for the two periods of the US’s UMP, the results show that the AAR of the COVID-19 pandemic period significantly affects the overall results for both periods Suppose in the GFC period, the windows -5, -2, and -1 have negative values In that case, when considering both phases, the opposite is true (like the COVID-19 pandemic period); this result is statistically significant at the 1% level The outcomes for both periods affirm the impact of the COVID-19 phase (as detailed in Table 4.3) and the general trend of AAR for each day before and after the event day If we combine the US’s UMP events for both periods, the result is like the COVID-19 pandemic phase This result shows that the observations during the COVID-19 pandemic phase significantly control the overall results when concluding the impact of the US’s UMP on the volatility of the Vietnamese stock market around event days (Figure 4.9)

Figure 4.9: The AAR of the market around the US’s UMP event dates

Source: Author's drawing from research results

In summary, the research results show that (i) there is a positive AAR occurrence on the Vietnamese stock market when there is information about the US’s UMP and (ii) there is a difference in the two periods; this is due to the differences in the context of UMP implementation as well as the size and frequency of UMP implementation by the US in each crisis period The results of nonparametric testing (using the GRANK Test in

Appendix 3) show statistical significance at the 1% level for the AAR of both pre-and post-event days This once again confirms the statistical significance of the research findings

4.3.1.2 Cumulative average abnormal return of the market

To take a closer look at the short-term reactions around the event date, the study will figure out the CAAR of the market in different event windows The analysis is considered in different periods and uses the same tests as above

Table 4.4: The CAAR of the market around the US’s UMP event dates

Date GFC period COVID-19 period Two periods

Source: calculated from research data

Table 4.4 shows the CAAR of the market in different event windows including the

CAAR of the preceding day and the event date [-1;0], time frames from the event date onwards 1 to 3 days ([0;+1], [0;+2], [0;+3]), different time frames around event date ([-1;+1], [-3;+3 ],[-5;+5]) The research results indicate that during the GFC period, the CAAR of the market gradually increased after the event date (day 0); specifically, the CAAR is 0.18% for the [0;+1] window, reaching the highest at 0.5% for the [0;+3] window, while the CAAR for windows including days before and after the event is more minor This proves that the US’s UMP announcements during this period positively affected the Vietnamese stock market, with the market showing an increasing trend from the day the information was announced and maintaining an upward trend until the third day after the event In contrast, the trend of CAAR during the COVID-19 period, the results of event windows from after the information about the US’s UMP was announced, shows that the market keeps an upward trend However, it only increases until the second day after the event, and the increase is not as high as in the GFC period Additionally, the market tends to rise before the event, as shown by the larger CAAR for windows before and after the event compared to windows from the event date onwards This result is partly due to the consecutive announcement of events during this period within a short timeframe The information about the US’s UMP during this period is concentrated when the Vietnamese stock market quickly recovered after a significant decline, as analyzed in Figure 4.6

Figure 4.10: CAAR of the market during the GFC period and COVID-19 period

Source: Author's drawing from research results

In contrast to the results in the GFC period, the market reacted positively to the information about the US’s UMP Figure 4.10 shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the CAAR of the event windows after the event date tends to decrease earlier and is smaller than the CAAR of the event windows around the event date This shows that the market has increased before the information is released due to the expectations of policies to support the US economy Most CAAR results in different event windows are statistically significant at a 1% significance level One thing in common in both periods is that the CAAR stays positive for the event windows after the event date, although the volatility trend is different

For both periods, as AAR, the CAAR of the event windows tends to be like the period of the COVID-19 pandemic This shows that the results of the COVID-19 pandemic period influence the overall CAAR results for both periods

In summary, the research results show that CAAR is like AAR, the US’s UMP news is good news, and the Vietnam stock market reacts positively in time event windows around event dates The findings related to the Vietnamese stock market response to the US’s UMP announcements during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic have provided insights into research questions 1 and 3, as elaborated earlier.

The reaction of different sectors to the US’s UMP announcement

4.3.2.1 Abnormal average return of different sectors

The US’s UMP announcement elicited a positive response from the Vietnamese stock market To delve into the influences more thoroughly, the study will meticulously analyze various sectors within the market during the examined periods

Table 4.5: AAR of different sectors during the GFC

Date Health Care Consumer Discretionary Real Estate Utilities Energy Information Technology Financial Consumer Staples Industrials Materials

Source: calculated from research data

Table 4.5 shows the average daily returns around events related to the US’s UMP announcements The analysis dates include the event date (day 0), five days before the event date (from -5 to -1), and five days after the event date (from 1 to 5) The results show that all 10/10 sectors show positive AAR on the event day The AAR result is statistically significant in three sectors: energy, consumer staples, and industrials; the positive AAR ranges from 0.02% (Finance) to 0.36% (Energy) After the event day, positive AAR is only sustained in 2/10 sectors; however, on the second day (+2), AAR turns positive again for 9/10 sectors In the following days, the positive return trend is no longer kept The study will analyze the CAAR in time windows around the event date to better see the profit trend before and after the event date

Table 4.6: AAR of different sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic

Date Health Care Consumer Discretionary Real Estate Utilities Energy Information Technology Financial Consumer Staples Industrials Materials

Source: calculated from research data

Table 4.6 illustrates the AAR of sectors on the event date, both before and after The results show that 9/10 sectors show a positive ARR on the day when information related to the US's UMP during the COVID-19 pandemic is announced The AAR on the event date ranges from -0.16% to 0.38% The financial, energy, and industrial sectors have a positive AAR and the highest prices, while only the information technology sector has a negative AAR Additionally, the AAR is statistically significant at the 1% level for the financial and industrial sectors

However, the number of sectors with a positive AAR diminishes in the later days Specifically, on day +1, there are 7/10 sectors; on day +2, there are 6/10; and on day +3, only 2/10 sectors keep a positive AAR This suggests that the Vietnamese stock market positively responds to the information released by the Fed about the implementation of UMP tools, with the most pronounced reaction occurring on the announcement date As time progresses after the announcement date, the AAR of sectors no longer sustains a positive response During this period, it appeared that the sectors reacted before the announced information of the announcement date of the UMP event; the stock price increased earlier, as shown by the AAR on -1 days; -2 and -3 were positive in Real Estate, Utilities, and Energy, Financial, Industrials, Materials but from the date of the event onwards these sectors could no longer maintain AAR as before the event date AAR reversed to decrease, except in the financial sector The remaining sectors are mostly negative before the AAR event date

4.3.2.2 Cumulative average abnormal return of different sectors

This study will analyze the CAAR of sectors across various event windows for a more detailed examination of market reactions in the preceding and following events

Table 4.7: CAAR of sectors during the global financial crisis

Average Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAAR)

Date Health Care Consumer Discretionary Real Estate Utilities Energy Information Technology Financial Consumer Staples Industrials Materials

Source: calculated from research data

The results of the CAAR across the event frames are shown in Table 4.7; the results show that not only on the event date and the time windows after the event date, but specifically the event windows [0;+1], [0;+2] and [0;+3] also have up to 9/10 positive CAAR excluding Information Technology sector This positive CAAR ranges from approximately 0.04% (Real estate) to 0.96% (Energy), with statistical significance at a 1% level The sector that responded most positively was the Energy sector, while the financial sector had the lowest cumulative positive profit after the event date The study also looked at the pre-event time window [-1;0], and the window includes the days both before and after the event date [-1;+1], [-3;+3] and [-5; +5] The results show that there are still positive CAARs in these event windows, but the number of sectors with positive CAARs is lower than the event window from the event date onwards

Table 4.8: CAAR of sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic

Average Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAAR)

Date Health Care Consumer Discretionary Real Estate Utilities Energy Information Technology Financial Consumer Staples Industrials Materials

Source: Source: calculated from research data

Table 4.8 shows CAARs of other sectors across time frames from the event date onwards, including the [0;+1], [0;+2], and [0;+3] windows The windows before the event date extend past the event date [-1;+1], [-3;+3], and [-5;+5], and the time frame includes the event date and pre-dates the event one day [-1;0] The results show that in the frame [0;+1], there are 10/10 days of positive cumulative profit with the lowest CAAR of 0.07% and the highest of 0.68% in the financial sector During the time windows [0;+2] and [0;+3], CAAR remained positive for 9 out of 10 sectors, with the CAAR of many sectors showing statistical significance at various p-value levels Like AAR on individual days, the CAARs of the real estate, energy, financial, industrial, and health care sectors kept a positive trend before and after the UMP event date Notably, the financial sector showed a positive CAAR after the event date The highest value reached 0.74%, which is significantly significant at the 1% level These sectors, particularly Health Care, benefited from the epidemic's impact or the maintenance of low-interest rates

However, before information about the US’s UMP policy, in addition to positive AAR and CAAR on various days and windows, as analyzed above, there are still specific differences between some sectors in the two periods of the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic Details about the CAAR trends of sectors are illustrated in Figure 4.11

Figure 4.11: CAAR of sectors during the GFC and COVID-19 periods

Source: calculated from research data

Figure 4.11 illustrates the CAAR for five days before and five days after the event

([-5;+5]), which is a suitable time frame to examine the impact of US’s UMP information on different sectors The results show: (i) There is a similarity in the CAAR fluctuations in sectors: health care, energy, consumer discretionary, industry, and materials, with CAAR gradually increasing from the event day onwards, although the upward trend only lasts until day +2 or +3, except for the Energy sector where CAAR sustains growth until day +5 (ii) real estate and financial sectors during the GFC period show a decreasing trend in CAAR (negative CAAR after the event day), while in the COVID-19 period, they keep a positive CAAR (iii) consumer staples and information technology sectors, despite the increasing CAAR trend after the event day, have an overall negative cumulative CAAR (iv) The utility sector shows a gradual CAAR increase after the event day during the GFC period, in contrast to the COVID-19 period.

Robustness test

In the previous section, the study used the market and risk-adjusted model or the market model to determine market and sector-specific AAR and CAAR In this section, the study will employ the market-adjusted model to assess abnormal returns, aiming to reexamine the research findings and ensure the robustness check of the results All procedures and tests for ESM are done as in previous work in section 3.1.1

Figure 4.12: CAAR of the market during the GFC period and COVID-19 period by the market-adjusted model

Source: Source: calculated from research data

Figure 4.12 illustrates the CAAR results of the market figured out by the market- adjusted model, which aligns with the market and risk-adjusted model findings when the CAAR results keep an upward trend until +2 days after the event date This shows a trend of gradually increasing CAAR accumulation after the event date, followed by a decline in the days further from the event Detailed results about AAR and CAAR are presented in

Figure 4.13: CAAR of sectors during the GFC and COVID-19 periods by the market-adjusted model

Source: Source: calculated from research data

The cumulative CAAR results within the [-5;+5] window for different sectors is detailed in Figure 4.13 The CAAR results for sectors in both periods show a similar trend to the CAAR figured out by the risk-adjusted and market models The CAAR results consistently keep positive accumulation, gradually increasing in the days following the event date However, the Information Technology sector shows a distinct trend, with its CAAR decreasing in both periods after the event date These results are statistically significant at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels based on parameter testing (Patel Test) and non- parametric testing (Generalized Rank Test) Details on AAR, CAAR, and statistical testing are presented in Appendix 4

The results affirm the robustness of estimating the AAR and CAAR outcomes of the study This reflects the positive impact of announcements on implementing the US’s UMP on Vietnam's financial markets around the event day.

RESEARCH RESULTS FROM SVAR

Correlation between variables

To visually examine the correlation between variables based on research data before estimating the SVAR model, the relationships between the variables 11 are shown through the figures from Figure 4.14 to Figure 4.21

11 There are time lags between the observed variables in this correlation analysis For example, when the Fed increases asset purchases, the Fed's balance sheet changes However, this change does not immediately impact Vietnam's economic growth

Figure 4.14 shows that during specific periods, such as 2007-2008 and amidst the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, a notable positive correlation emerged between the total assets of the FED and Vietnam's real GDP growth from 2007 to

2008, as the FED's total assets expanded, Vietnam experienced significant economic growth (6.62%), benefitting from favorable external conditions However, there is a lag between the implementation of economic policies and their impact on Vietnam's economy Similarly, during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020, the FED's asset purchases aimed at stabilizing the global economy appeared to coincide with Vietnam's resilience, as the country managed to keep positive GDP growth (4.21%) despite the pandemic's disruptions These instances underscore the interconnectedness of global financial institutions and the Vietnamese economy during critical junctures

Ja n -0 7 Ju l- 0 7 Ja n -0 8 Ju l- 0 8 Ja n -0 9 Ju l- 0 9 Ja n -1 0 Ju l- 1 0 Ja n -1 1 Ju l- 1 1 Ja n -1 2 Ju l- 1 2 Ja n -1 3 Ju l- 1 3 Ja n -1 4 Ju l- 1 4 Ja n -1 5 Ju l- 1 5 Ja n -1 6 Ju l- 1 6 Ja n -1 7 Ju l- 1 7 Ja n -1 8 Ju l- 1 8 Ja n -1 9 Ju l- 1 9 Ja n -2 0 Ju l- 2 0 Ja n -2 1 Ju l- 2 1 Ja n -2 2

Change in Fed's Balance Sheet Real GDP Growth

Figure 4.14: Correlation between change in Fed’s balance sheet and real GDP growth in

Figure 4.15: Correlation between change in Fed’s balance sheet and inflation in

Figure 4.15 illustrates that a discernible positive correlation appeared between the total assets of Fed and inflation in Vietnam in most stages of research In 2007-2008, as the Fed expanded its total assets to mitigate the global financial crisis, Vietnam witnessed increased inflationary pressures after that, driven in part by rising commodity prices Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the Fed's asset purchases aimed at stabilizing global financial markets had spill-over effects, contributing to inflationary tendencies in Vietnam, particularly in the context of disrupted supply chains However, there is a certain lag during crisis periods about this correlation

Figure 4.16: Correlation between shadow short rate of the US and real GDP growth in

Ja n -0 7 Au g -0 7 M ar-0 8 Oc t-0 8 M ay -0 9 De c -0 9 Ju l- 1 0 F eb -1 1 S ep -1 1 Ap r-1 2 No v -1 2 Ju n -1 3 Ja n -1 4 Au g -1 4 Ma r-1 5 Oc t-1 5 M ay -1 6 De c -1 6 Ju l- 1 7 F eb -1 8 S ep -1 8 Ap r-1 9 No v -1 9 Ju n -2 0 Ja n -2 1 Au g -2 1

Change in Fed's Balance Sheet Inflation

Ja n -0 7 Ju l- 0 7 Ja n -0 8 Ju l- 0 8 Ja n -0 9 Ju l- 0 9 Ja n -1 0 Ju l- 1 0 Ja n -1 1 Ju l- 1 1 Ja n -1 2 Ju l- 1 2 Ja n -1 3 Ju l- 1 3 Ja n -1 4 Ju l- 1 4 Ja n -1 5 Ju l- 1 5 Ja n -1 6 Ju l- 1 6 Ja n -1 7 Ju l- 1 7 Ja n -1 8 Ju l- 1 8 Ja n -1 9 Ju l- 1 9 Ja n -2 0 Ju l- 2 0 Ja n -2 1 Ju l- 2 1 Ja n -2 2

Shadow short-rate Real GDP Growth

It appears that there is a resemblance between the fluctuations in the shadow rate of the US and real GDP growth and inflation in Vietnam However, it should be noted that the expansion of the Fed balance sheet concerns the decline in the shadow rate Therefore, there exists a noticeable negative correlation emerged between the shadow short rate of the United States and these two key economic indicators in Vietnam, especially during the GFC and pandemic crisis (Figure 4.16 and Figure 4.17)

Figure 4.17: Correlation between the shadow short rate of the US and inflation in

The relationship between the VIX index and real GDP growth in Vietnam during the pivotal periods of 2007-2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic has shown a notable negative correlation (Figure 4.18) In 2007-2008, as the VIX index, which measures market volatility and uncertainty, surged due to the global financial crisis (approximately 50), Vietnam's real GDP growth faced significant headwinds (3%) Still, it also had a certain lag, not immediately The heightened uncertainty adversely affected investor confidence and capital inflows, contributing to a slowdown in economic expansion Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the VIX index experienced extreme fluctuations (53.5), reflecting the market's uncertainty and risk aversion Consequently, Vietnam's real GDP growth contracted temporarily (0.67%) as global supply chains were disrupted, and demand weakened only in 6 months These episodes underscore the sensitivity of Vietnam's economic performance to external shocks and highlight the inverse relationship between VIX volatility and economic growth during these challenging times

Ja n -0 7 Ju l- 0 7 Ja n -0 8 Ju l- 0 8 Ja n -0 9 Ju l- 0 9 Ja n -1 0 Ju l- 1 0 Ja n -1 1 Ju l- 1 1 Ja n -1 2 Ju l- 1 2 Ja n -1 3 Ju l- 1 3 Ja n -1 4 Ju l- 1 4 Ja n -1 5 Ju l- 1 5 Ja n -1 6 Ju l- 1 6 Ja n -1 7 Ju l- 1 7 Ja n -1 8 Ju l- 1 8 Ja n -1 9 Ju l- 1 9 Ja n -2 0 Ju l- 2 0 Ja n -2 1 Ju l- 2 1 Ja n -2 2

Figure 4.18: Correlation between the VIX index and real GDP growth in Vietnam

A negative correlation between the VIX index and inflation in Vietnam, particularly during the tumultuous periods of 2007-2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic, is also evident in Figure 4.19 It underscores how heightened market volatility, as reflected by the VIX index, tended to be associated with reduced inflationary pressures in Vietnam during critical economic periods

Figure 4.19: Correlation between VIX index and inflation in Vietnam

Ja n -0 7 Ju l- 0 7 Ja n -0 8 Ju l- 0 8 Ja n -0 9 Ju l- 0 9 Ja n -1 0 Ju l- 1 0 Ja n -1 1 Ju l- 1 1 Ja n -1 2 Ju l- 1 2 Ja n -1 3 Ju l- 1 3 Ja n -1 4 Ju l- 1 4 Ja n -1 5 Ju l- 1 5 Ja n -1 6 Ju l- 1 6 Ja n -1 7 Ju l- 1 7 Ja n -1 8 Ju l- 1 8 Ja n -1 9 Ju l- 1 9 Ja n -2 0 Ju l- 2 0 Ja n -2 1 Ju l- 2 1 Ja n -2 2

VIX index Real GDP Growth

Ja n -0 7 Ju l- 0 7 Ja n -0 8 Ju l- 0 8 Ja n -0 9 Ju l- 0 9 Ja n -1 0 Ju l- 1 0 Ja n -1 1 Ju l- 1 1 Ja n -1 2 Ju l- 1 2 Ja n -1 3 Ju l- 1 3 Ja n -1 4 Ju l- 1 4 Ja n -1 5 Ju l- 1 5 Ja n -1 6 Ju l- 1 6 Ja n -1 7 Ju l- 1 7 Ja n -1 8 Ju l- 1 8 Ja n -1 9 Ju l- 1 9 Ja n -2 0 Ju l- 2 0 Ja n -2 1 Ju l- 2 1 Ja n -2 2

Figure 4.20 shows a positive correlation between foreign portfolio investment flows and real GDP growth in Vietnam It can be explained that this capital flow has played a pivotal role in driving economic expansion in the country by injecting capital into financial markets and various sectors of the economy As Vietnam's economic fundamentals have improved, FPI has become increasingly attractive to international investors seeking higher returns Consequently, as FPI flows have increased, real GDP growth in Vietnam has shown a corresponding upward trajectory, underscoring the significance of foreign portfolio investment as a catalyst for the country's sustained economic growth and development

Figure 4.20: Correlation between capital flow and real GDP growth in Vietnam

Similar signs also occur with inflation in Vietnam (Figure 4.21) While a direct positive correlation might not be immediately evident, FPI can contribute to inflationary pressures in certain circumstances When foreign investors inject substantial funds into the Vietnamese financial markets or specific asset classes, it can increase asset prices and create speculative bubbles This, in turn, can indirectly contribute to inflation by increasing the cost of living for ordinary citizens as asset prices rise

Data statistical description

This study collects and arranges a monthly time series of macroeconomic data for the SVAR model Table 4.9 has statistical description details

CBB VIX CF SP IRR FOREX GDP CPI

CBB and CF data are collected in millions of USD Negative CF capital flows represent capital outflows, and positive signs represent capital flows into Vietnam The standard deviation of these two variables is quite high because there is a large difference between the smallest and largest values, while the remaining variables do not have too large standard deviations (see Table 4.9) Besides, 184 observations are suitable for time-series regression and for the research model

Ja n -0 7 Au g -0 7 Ma r-0 8 Oc t-0 8 M ay -0 9 D ec -0 9 Ju l- 1 0 F eb -1 1 Sep- 1 1 Ap r-1 2 No v -1 2 Ju n -1 3 Ja n -1 4 Au g -1 4 Ma r-1 5 Oc t-1 5 M ay -1 6 D ec -1 6 Ju l- 1 7 F eb -1 8 Sep- 1 8 Ap r-1 9 No v -1 9 Ju n -2 0 Ja n -2 1 Au g -2 1

The results from SVAR Model

For the regression model to have reliable estimated results, avoid the phenomenon of fake regression, which needs to perform the unit root testing to consider the stationary or non-stationary variables The standard method applied is Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) The results of the ADF test for unit root are shown in Table 4.10 The results demonstrate that the test statistics are above the critical values, implying that all variables, including CBB, VIX, CF, SP, IRR, GDP, and CPI, are stationary at their current levels, except FOREX, which is stationary at the 1 st difference

Table 4.10: Unit Root Test Result (ADF test)

Variables Level 1 st difference Conclusion

In this study, all variables used to estimate the SVAR model are stationary, so the data series is suitable for regression

4.4.3.2 The optimal lag-length selection results

Table 4.11 on lag criteria indicates that lags 3, 11, and 12 are deemed appropriate for

SVAR, as suggested by LR, SC, FPE, and HQ criteria However, the models at lags 3 and

12 result in impulse response outcomes that are not statistically significant in several essential variables Hence, the optimal lag length for the chosen model is 11

Table 4.11: Lag order for each model according to selected criteria

Lag LogL LR FPE AIC SC HQ

*Indicates lag order selected by the criterion

Source: author’s calculation 4.4.3.3 Diagnostic testing results a Model stability test

The stability of the VAR model is considered by testing the roots of AR characteristic polynomials A necessary and sufficient condition for the VAR model to be stable is that the roots of AR characteristic polynomials lie outside the unit circle, or the inverse roots of AR characteristic polynomials must lie inside the unit circle The result shows that the model meets the stability conditions since the inverse roots of AR characteristic polynomials lie inside the unit circle In conclusion, the estimated VAR (11) model is stable (see Figure 4.22)

Figure 4.22: Inverse roots of AR characteristic polynomial

Source: author’s calculation b Residual Serial Correlation LM tests

The results of the series correlation test of residuals show that there is no chain correlation of residuals in the VAR (11) model (Table 4.12) Therefore, the estimated SVAR model is reliable

Table 4.12: Residual serial correlation LM tests

Source: author’s calculation 4.4.3.4 Impulse response results

❖ Responses of GDP and CPI to UMP shock and transmission channels

Figure 4.23 depicts the reactions of output and the price index to UMP shocks in the

United States As illustrated in the graph, a shock to the total assets of the Fed balance sheet significantly boosts Vietnam's output and price index However, only the reaction to GDP is meaningful for the ninth month More precisely, an increase in CBB causes a positive and statistically significant increase in GDP in the ninth month following the shock, peaking after roughly ten months at an increase of 4.2 percentage points The reaction of CPI to a shock of US’s UMP is similar to the response of GDP when a positive shock to US’s UMP leads to a steady upward effect on the CPI of Vietnam in the short term, peaks at a 0.3 pp rise, and lasts for around one year However, this response is not statistically significant

Figure 4.23: Responses of GDP and CPI to the US’s UMP shock

The VIX shock leads to a sharp drop in GDP, hitting a five-month high of 3.1 percentage points (Figure 4.24) CPI responds equally negatively, culminating in a 0.26 percent decline The influence on CPI variables becomes considerable and statistically significant from the beginning of the second month through the end of the third month after the VIX shock

Figure 4.24: Responses of GDP and CPI to the VIX shocks

Foreign portfolio flow has a comparable impact on Vietnam's GDP and CPI as the CBB shock (Figure 4.25) Specifically, GDP and CPI are raised after the CF shock, peaking at 2.7 pp, and increasing by 0.64 pp after around nine months and one year, respectively However, the GDP and CPI response to the CF shock are not statistically significant

Figure 4.25: Responses of GDP and CPI to the CF shock

Besides, it is very important regarding capital flows in the transmission (Figure

4.26) The spike in inflows has resulted in a significant boost in Vietnam's market returns

The initial response of stock prices in Vietnam has been notably favorable for four months, hitting a peak after four months with an increase of 2.6 percentage points However, SP's response to this shock declines around nine months after the shock, even though it is not statistically significant

Figure 4.26: Responses of equity returns to the CF shocks

❖ Responses of GDP and CPI to domestic shocks

The responses of GDP and CPI variables to a shock to stock price are displayed in

Figure 4.27 Although not statistically significant, the results show an upward effect on

GDP and CPI after the SP shock It aligns with Tobin's q theory, which states that higher stock prices result in greater output and expenditure

Figure 4.27: Responses of GDP and CPI to the SP shocks

The study finds relatively similar results, shown in Figure 4.28, but only the response of CPI to FOREX shock is statistically significant The response of CPI becomes statistically significant starting from the second month after the shock and lasts until the fourth month An increase in FOREX will result in CPI increasing by 0.1 percentage points initially, peaking at 0.4 percentage points in the fourth month after the shock Additionally, the expansion of the US monetary policy leads to a decrease in interest rate (Figure 4.29)

Specifically, the response of IRR to the shock resulting from the Fed's balance sheet expansion is statistically significant from the first month after the shock to the fifth month

An increase in CBB causes IRR to decrease from the first month, with the sharpest decrease occurring in the third month after the shock, reaching 0.6 percentage points

Figure 4.28: Responses of GDP and CPI to the FOREX and IRR shocks

Figure 4.29: Responses of IRR to the US’s UMP shocks

Source: author’s calculation 4.4.3.5 Variance decomposition results

Figure 4.30 presents an analysis of the forecast error variance decomposition of GDP Although not the most significant factors reflecting the change in GDP, CBB, VIX, and CF also account for a high proportion in explaining GDP The VIX variable explains 5.3% of the shift in GDP starting in the tenth month and increases gradually to about 12.9% in the twelfth month CF also explains more significantly, accounting for 3.2% at the beginning and 12.6% in explaining the fluctuation of GDP In addition, CBB explains the change in GDP more clearly The CBB begins to significantly explain a share of 2% of the fluctuation of GDP in the seventh month, peaking at 9.4% in the tenth month and 7.9% in one year.

Figure 4.30: Contribution of the US’s UMP shocks to the forecast variance decomposition of GDP

In Figure 4.31, the contribution of CBB, VIX, and CF shocks to CPI is less significant than their contribution to GDP Although the contribution of CBB shock to the shift of CPI in Vietnam was small in the first month (around 0.3%), this contribution spiked in the next month and peaked in the 5th month at 5.1%, then decreased slightly and maintained around 4% in the following months Overall, shocks to CBB and CF are quite important in explaining the variability of CPI and GDP; however, shocks to VIX seem to be less crucial in this case

CBB VIX CF SP IRR FOREX CPI

Figure 4.31: Contribution of the US’s UMP shocks to the forecast variance decomposition of CPI

SVAR results for the GFC and during pandemic crisis

The study divides the sample into two periods to analyze the responsiveness of GDP and CPI and the extent of the effect of these variables on the UMP shock in the United States during two distinct crisis periods Periods of GFC (2008-2014) and COVID-19 (December 2019 to 2022) The exogenous variable, the number of monthly new confirmed cases of COVID-19, is employed in the pandemic crisis phase to highlight the pandemic's implications, as described in title 3.1.2

Figure 4.32: The response of GDP to the US’s UMP shock in the period of GFC and during the pandemic crisis

CBB VIX CF SP IRR FOREX GDP

Response of GDP to CBB shock

Figure 4.32 depicts the impact of the US’s UMP shock on GDP across two time periods According to the data, the GDP response to the US’s UMP shock was more significant during the global financial crisis than during the COVID-19 era The magnitude of GDP growth for the US's expansionary monetary policy increases with time, reaching 18.23pp one year after the shock Meanwhile, the reaction of GDP to the Fed's balance sheet expansion shock during the COVID-19 outbreak is half that of the GFC periods, at 7.04pp one year later

Figure 4.33: The response of CPI to the US’s UMP shock in the period of GFC and during the pandemic crisis

In a comparable vein, the effect of the US’s UMP on CPI in Figure 4.33 reveals a difference between the two periods The reaction begins to diverge significantly after the fourth month Specifically, CPI steadily climbed during the GFC in response to the US’s UMP shock, rising from 0.18pp in April to 1.44pp in December Meanwhile, during the epidemic crisis, CPI only grew marginally in the third month following the shock, at 0.17pp, before progressively declining and remaining close to zero in December

Table 4.13: Contribution of CBB shocks to the forecast variance decomposition of

Response of CPI to CBB shock

Based on the Cholesky decomposition, the variance decomposition results support further evidence of the impact of the US’s UMP on Vietnam's real economy during two different crisis periods Table 4.13 compares the contribution of the CBB shock to explaining changes in GDP and CPI in two separate crises The results show that during the GFC period, the contribution of CBB shock to the fluctuation in GDP was more than three times higher than its contribution during the COVID-19 period in the fourth month This ratio gradually decreased in the following months but was still significantly higher

To sum up, it can be seen that during the period of the global financial crisis, the impact of the shock induced by the Fed's balance sheet expansion on the Vietnamese economy was typically more significant than during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.

Robustness test

To test the model's robustness, Wu and Xia's shadow short rate for the US is gathered to substitute total assets on the Fed's balance sheet as a proxy for the US's UMP All procedures and tests for SVAR are done as in previous work in section 3.1.2

Wu and Xia's Shadow Short Rate (SSR) is a market-invisible estimate of the short- term interest rate It is generated using a model that integrates data from interest rate term structure and macroeconomic factors The SSR was first introduced by Wu and Xia (2016) The SSR is based on a shadow-rate model, which describes the relationship between observable longer-term bond yields and the unobservable short-term rate the central bank would like to set if not constrained by the zero lower bound (i.e., the lowest possible interest rate) The SSR may be used to assess how monetary policy impacts the general state of the economy when the policy rate is at or near the zero lower limit According to

Wu and Xia (2016), the SSR provides a more exact representation of monetary policy stance than the actual policy rate, which may fail to account for the effects of unconventional monetary policy initiatives such as quantitative easing Thus, SSR is one of the most valuable indicators, along with total assets on the Fed's balance sheet, for investigating the effects of the US’s UMP on foreign nations Understandably, the Fed's expansionary monetary policy via unconventional tools will be reflected in a fall in SSR, and vice versa; hence, the explanation for the SSR variable will be reversed when compared to the reason for the results using the variable CBB

Figure 4.34: Responses of GDP to the SSR, VIX and CF shocks

Although the GDP reaction to SSR and VIX shocks is not statistically significant (Figure 4.34), it does illustrate the negative impact of SSR and VIX on GDP GDP will fall when SSR and VIX induce a spike in shock This result is consistent with the expected sign (Tillmann, 2016; Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021) Capital inflows boost Vietnam's production GDP rises after the CF shock, peaks at 8.7 percentage points after about six months, then steadily declines and returns to baseline after a year It aligns with the expectation of (Anaya et al., 2017; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019)

Figure 4.35: Responses of CPI to the SSR, VIX and CF shocks

Figure 4.35 depicts the price index's impulsive reaction to several shocks The analysis discovers an adverse reaction of the CPI variable to a shock to the shadow short rate and risk aversion and a positive response of the CPI variable to a shock to capital inflows Notably, the estimated responses show that an increase in shadow rate leads to a persistent negative and statistically significant decrease in CPI at the beginning of the shock In addition, the response of the price index is estimated to be significantly negative for more than seven months after the beginning of the shock, reaching its peak after around seven months at a decrease of 0.33 pp Finally, an increase in capital flows leads to a significant rise to CPI beginning from sixth month after the UMP shocks and reaching a peak at the eleventh month after shock, at an increase of 0.63pp These results are consistent with (Anaya et al., 2017; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019; Tillmann, 2016) and economic theory on the international transmission of US’s UMP to the rest of the world Further crucially, when utilizing the variable CBB as a proxy for the US's unorthodox monetary policy, these results add further evidence to the research findings

To summarize, both the findings in which the US's UMP is proxied by the total assets of the Fed's balance sheet and the shadow short rate indicate that relaxing monetary conditions in the US leads to an increase in output and the price index in Vietnam They support the dominance of risk-taking and portfolio rebalancing channels in the worldwide spillover effects of the US’s UMP on a small, open economy and a frontier market These analysis and empirical results in both cases are consistent with the recent study of (Anaya et al., 2017; Gambacorta et al., 2014; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019; Tillmann, 2016; Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021).

DISCUSSING RESEARCH RESULTS

The reaction of the financial market

4.5.1.1 Reaction of the financial market to US’s UMP announcements

During the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States implemented UMP to alleviate economic difficulties and stabilize financial markets Forward guidance was used to shape market expectations regarding the future trajectory of interest rates In both crises, emergency lending facilities were set up to aid various sectors, guaranteeing the smooth operation of financial markets and credit availability The UMP implemented during these crises proved a commitment to liquidity provision, financial market support, and the promotion of economic recovery

On the US’s UMP event date, the AAR of the market is positive and statistically significant in both study periods, which confirms that the Vietnamese stock market has reacted to US’s UMP policy information The post-event windows [0;+1] and [0;+2] still keep positive CAARs even though these post-event date AARs for many sectors are negative, which once confirmed the positive market reaction on the day of the event As the days move further from the event date, the AAR of the market turns negative

This result is also consistent with (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017), where information about US expansionary monetary policy positively impacts India and China on the event day The findings are consistent with (Võ & Đặng, 2018) regarding the response of the Vietnamese market to US monetary policy announcements

Unlike the AAR for individual days, the CAAR reflects the cumulative returns of the days surrounding the event date Specifically, during the GFC period, the positive accumulation trend appeared in the event windows from the event date onward; the CAAR gradually increased over the days from +1 to +3, and the remaining event window frames stayed the same, due to the accumulation of CAAR in the post-event period The positive market reaction after the event is consistent with (Chen et al., 2012; Rai & Suchanek,

2014) Incredibly, it's compatible with (Lubys & Panda, 2021), with the GFC period, the US's UMP in late 2008 had the most significant impact on all the BRICS countries Besides, The EU appears to be less influential throughout the announcements and industries impacted, which contradicts the regions' interconnectivity since trade flows are more significant or comparable to the US with most BRICS countries (Lubys & Panda,

2021) This is consistent with the scope of this study, considering only the effect of the US's UMP

This result is consistent with Hypothesis 1.1: The Vietnamese stock market responds positively to announcements related to the US's UMP in the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic period In addition, we can see the market's efficiency and the impact of the US macro policies on the Vietnamese market, especially monetary policy

Health care, energy, industrials, material, and consumer staples sectors reacted similarly when maintaining CAAR before and after the event date This is counter- characteristic of a crisis-preventive sector (health care, consumer staples, material) and a sector that highly benefits from monetary policies to support economic recovery (energy, industrials) in times of crisis This result is consistent with Hypothesis 1.2: The different sectors reacted positively to announcements related to the US's UMP

This result is also consistent with (Galloppo & Paimanova, 2017; Lubys & Panda,

2021), when they show the reactions of the different sectors to the announcements of the

US monetary policy, especially the announcements of the expansionary monetary policy and the 1 st announcement made by the US monetary authorities which took place in late

2008 had the most significant impact over all the BRICS countries On the other hand, the

EU appears to be less impactful across the announcements and sectors affected The results about the CAAR of sectors during the GFC period are consistent with the overall market trend

4.5.1.2 Differences in financial market reactions during the GFC and COVID-19 period

While the United States enacted UMP during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic, their specific strategies showed notable differences During the GFC, Fed primarily concentrated on QE, which involved LASP, including mortgage-backed and longer-term Treasury securities, to reduce long-term interest rates The initial round of QE was announced and started in November 2008, with the primary objective of lowering financial market instability and stabilizing the US economy After the conclusion of QE1 in March 2010, QE2 was launched in November 2010, followed by Operation Twist in September 2012 and another wave of QE (QE3) in September 2012 (Belke, 2018) Forward guidance and interest rate reductions were also used In contrast, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Fed resumed QE and introduced new facilities and tools These included corporate bond purchases, lending programs for Main Street businesses, and special- purpose vehicles to support various sectors The response to the pandemic involved a quicker and more extensive use of emergency lending facilities to stabilize financial markets and address liquidity issues in specific sectors The scale and variety of tools deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic reflected the unprecedented nature of the economic challenges posed by the global health crisis

During the GFC before the event day, the AAR of many sectors was negative; specifically, on -1, there were 6/10 sectors, while on -2, 10/10 sectors were negative However, in COVID-19, a few sectors had negative AAR before the event date, precisely one day There were 3/10 sectors, while two days before the event date, it was 2/10 sectors This difference is because, in the GFC period, the US’s UMP policy was implemented for a long time, from 2008 to 2013, with diverse levels of implementation by the Fed While in the COVID-19 period, the UMP was implemented in a shorter period (From March 13 to September 17) and focusing on a series of consecutive announcements on March 13-24, so positive AAR appeared a lot during this period; this result is consistent with the analysis The real estate, industrials, materials, and finance sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic had a much more positive response than during the GFC period; stocks in these sectors kept positive AAR and CAAR and high statistical significance The financial and real estate sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic showed much better AAR and CAAR trends than they did during the financial crisis period However, the information technology sector showed contrasting CAAR trends between the GFC and COVID-19 periods

The positive AAR and CAAR results of the market and various sectors in the research's event windows partially address research question 1 and support research And

Hypothesis 3.1: There are differences in the reaction of the Vietnamese stock market to announcements related to the US’s UMP during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic and Hypothesis 3.2: There are differences between sectors with announcements related to the US’s UMP during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic period While most sectors react positively when information about the US’S UMP is announced, the only information technology sector during the COVID-19 pandemic shows a negative AAR on the event day The positive trends in AAR and CAAR are sustained for windows, typically ranging from 3 to 4 days post-event (except for the energy sector).

The response of the real economy

4.5.2.1 The response of the real economy to the shock

The expansion of the Fed's balance sheet following the implementation of UMP in the US has resulted in notable impacts on Vietnam's economy Specifically, there has been a positive increase in both GDP and CPI in Vietnam However, it's important to note that while the response of GDP to this expansion is significant, the response of CPI is not statistically significant This suggests that the UMP measures undertaken by the Fed has had a discernible effect on stimulating economic growth in Vietnam, yet the impact on consumer prices has not been as pronounced or conclusive from a statistical standpoint It can be explained that the US plays a significant role in the global economy, and its monetary policy decisions have ripple effects across international markets Expansionary monetary policies, such as UMP, often stimulate economic activity not only domestically but also in other countries through increased trade and investment In addition, these policies can lead to increased liquidity and lower interest rates, encouraging capital flows to emerging markets like Vietnam, which in turn can fuel investment, consumption, and economic growth These findings are consistent with (Anaya et al., 2017; Punzi & Chantapacdepong, 2019), who discovered that prices and production rise after an expansionary monetary policy shock This finding is also consistent with Vietnam's experience (as discussed in Section 4.2.2) During the GFC, Vietnam's GDP growth rate did experience a decline, but it quickly recovered afterwards This pattern is similar to what was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic

The VIX index also influences Vietnam's GDP and CPI The findings reveal an adverse reaction of GDP and CPI to a VIX shock A spike in the VIX index implies increased risk aversion, which reduces risk appetite and increases market uncertainty These results are consistent with the literature on risk-taking channels (Yildirim & Ivrendi, 2021) and the changes in risk aversion to output and price index (Tillmann, 2017) It also underlines the significance of risk-taking routes in the international transmission of the US’s UMP to Vietnam Moreover, the findings also show the key role of capital flows in the transmission process The surge in capital flows has led to a notable increase in the stock return of Vietnam It implies that the expansion of unconventional monetary policy in the United States resulted in a spike in capital flows to Vietnam, causing the SP variable to rise temporarily It can be explained that UMP measures in the US, such as quantitative easing, often result in lower interest rates and increased liquidity in global financial markets This can prompt investors to seek higher returns in emerging markets like Vietnam, leading to a surge in capital inflows As a result, demand for Vietnamese stocks may increase, driving up stock prices These findings show that capital movements are an essential conduit for transmitting US monetary shocks (Rey, 2016)

When it comes to the domestic shocks, the research results showed that the shock of FOREX led to a rise in CPI More specifically, a depreciation of the local currency leads to a persistent increase in the price index This result is suitable for a theory about the exchange rate channel proposed by (Mishkin, 2022) According to this, changes in interest rates caused by policy can also impact the exchange rate, resulting in a change in output and inflation Besides, the expansion of the US monetary policy also leads to a decrease in interest rate The possible interpretation is that when the US applies expansionary monetary policy by implementation of unconventional tools, an inflow will run into Vietnam and stabilize the exchange rate, Vietnam government might adjust the exchange rate via foreign exchange reserve resulting interest rate will be declined Therefore, the downward movement of the interest rate in Vietnam reflects a monetary policy reaction to the increase of the US’s UMP Central banks lowered the interest rates in response to the foreign monetary shocks This result is consistent with the findings of (Punzi & Chantapacdepong,

In summary, the US’s UMP caused a surge in capital inflows to Vietnam via the risk- taking channel and portfolio rebalancing channel, booms in asset prices, and increases in real GDP and price index The expansion of the US monetary policy exerts pressure to reduce interest rates through the intervention of the State Bank of Vietnam This result confirms the existence of the positive responses of Vietnam’s real economy to the expansion of the US monetary policy via unconventional tools, which also proves

Hypothesis 2: The US’s UMP positively affects the real economy of Vietnam in the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic period and explains second research question 4.5.2.2 The differences in response of the real economy during the GFC and COVID-19 period

The response of GDP and CPI to the shock resulting from the Fed's balance sheet expansion during the COVID-19 outbreak is approximately half of what was observed during the GFC periods Additionally, in the GFC period, the influence of the CBB shock on GDP fluctuations was over three times greater compared to its impact during the COVID-19 period In summary, it is evident that during the GFC, the effects of the shock induced by the Fed's balance sheet expansion on the Vietnamese economy were typically more pronounced than during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis The outcomes of this study contradict recent findings for EMEs by Cortes et al (2022) and Rebucci et al (2022) and and also contradicts research Hypothesis 3.3:Vietnam’s real economy responds more strongly to the shock of the US’s UMP during COVID-19 than the previous global financial crisis However, it contributes more empirical evidence when it comes to an open, small economy and a frontier market Although the results are inconsistent with recent findings for EMEs, they also have relevance to the situation in Vietnam and across the world during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, as seen below To begin with, the global financial crisis was more severe and persistent than the COVID-19 catastrophe The worldwide economic activity was significantly reduced because of the financial crisis, with many nations enduring a recession The COVID-19 crisis also led to a global recession, but the downturn was not as severe or long-lasting as the financial crisis As a result of the severity and duration of the global financial crisis, the influence of US monetary policy on other nations may have been higher Second, the financial crisis was a financial catastrophe that began in the US housing market and expanded to the global financial system In contrast, the COVID-19 problem was a health crisis that resulted in a severe decline in economic activity due to lockdowns and other limitations

The nature of the crises may have influenced how US monetary policy was transmitted to other nations, with the financial crisis causing more broad financial stress and spillovers than the COVID-19 issue Furthermore, other nations' reactions to the GFC and the COVID-19 situation may have varied, influencing the transmission of US monetary policy Many nations employed expansionary monetary and fiscal policies to offset the effects of the financial crisis, which may have exacerbated the transmission of US monetary policy Many nations used expansionary policies during the COVID-19 crisis, although the response was more variable and less coordinated than during the financial crisis periods.

Finally, the thesis then aims to provide specific answers to the research questions

Research question 1: To what extent did the announcements of the US's Unconventional Monetary Policy during the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic influence the Vietnamese financial market?

The research results indicate that the Vietnamese stock market positively reacts to the information about the US's UMP with short event windows This result holds for most different sectors Specifically, the reaction was clear on the event date when the AAR of the market and the AAR of various sectors were positive on this day, the statistically significant results for the market and some sectors The AAR and CAAR of the market after the event date remain positive In addition, AAR and CAAR are positive for most sectors

The research results also show that the market has a positive reaction on the day of the UMP event; specifically, the AAR of the market during the GFC period is 0.16% and during the COVID-19 pandemic period is 0.19% (statistically significant results at 1% significance level), for the whole period, the AAR is 0.18% The AAR that remains positive for the days after the event date This positive result is also accurate for the CAAR of event windows ([0;+1]; [0;+2] [0;+3]) of the range from 0.13% to 0.50% (GFC period), 0.22% - 0.36 % (COVID-19 period) and 0.27% - 0.39% (two periods)

For different sectors, the study results show that there is still positive AAR on the event day, the days after the event date, and within the event windows CARR from the event date to day +3 (window events [0;+1]; [0;+2] [0;+3]) of sectors remained positive with different CAAR values where the most prominent positive CAAR is 0.96% (for the Energy sector), and the most minor positive is 0.04% The trend in the value of CAAR of all sectors continued during the COVID-19 period when the positive CAAR for event windows after the event date ranged from 0.07% to 0.90%

This study also uses a different model to identify AR, specifically the market- adjusted model The results indicate that there is not much difference in the trends of AAR and CAAR This robustness test also strengthens the preceding results The research results also affirm the effectiveness of the Vietnamese stock market in response to the information related to the US’s UMP

Research question 2: To what degree did US’s Unconventional Monetary Policy shocks contribute to cyclical fluctuations within the Vietnamese real economy during the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic?

Due to the lag eleven and estimating SVAR model, the impulse response functions showed the first main findings of this study: An expansionary monetary policy by unconventional measures leads to an increase in Vietnam's output, and price indexes have increased significantly In contrast, only the GDP response has increased dramatically for the nine months However, the response of GDP to a change in CBB is more robust than that of the CPI Furthermore, risk aversion has an influence on GDP and CPI in Vietnam A surge in the VIX index signals increased risk aversion, leading to a quick drop in GDP following the shock, reaching its peak after five months The response of CPI is similarly negative; it becomes significant from the beginning of the second month until the third month after the shock The variance decomposition also found that besides shock to itself, shocks to VIX are not completely important in explaining the variability of CPI and GDP only in the first two months Still, it is essential in the following periods to one year

In addition, although the impact of foreign capital inflows on GDP and CPI is not statistically significant, the results also suggest that an upward shock of this capital inflow causes stock prices to increase sharply immediately after the shock It implies that the expansion of UMP in the United States resulted in a spike in capital flows to Vietnam, causing the SP variable to rise temporarily This conclusion demonstrates the significance of capital flows as a primary route for the transmission of US monetary shocks and the indirect rise in GDP caused by an increase in capital inflows into the Vietnamese stock market

Another finding is that besides being influenced by external variables, the CPI in Vietnam is also affected by foreign exchange rates More specifically, a depreciation of the exchange rate leads to a persistent increase in the price index This result can be explained through the intervention of the State Bank of Vietnam due to the expansion of the US monetary policy When the US implements UMP as part of its expansionary monetary policy, foreign capital will flow into Vietnam To stabilize the exchange rate, the Vietnamese government can adjust the exchange rate by using foreign exchange reserves, leading to a depreciation in local currency, which will lower interest rates and benefit the price index and GDP

The robustness check strengthens the preceding results Using Wu and Xia's shadow short rate for the US as a proxy for the US's UMP, the GDP and CPI reaction results to the UMP shock are similar to the conclusions calculated using total assets on the Fed's balance sheet Precisely, an increase in shadow short rate reflects a contractionary monetary policy in the US, leading to a persistent negative and statistically significant decrease in CPI at the beginning of the shock and a damaging decline in Vietnam's GDP

CONCLUSION

Monetary policy is one of the crucial instruments for countries to regulate macroeconomic conditions However, during major crises, traditional monetary policy tools may prove ineffective Developed countries worldwide resort to a new instrument known as unconventional monetary policy in such contexts When these nations implement UMP, its impact extends to their own economies and permeates other countries Among developed nations, the United States wields the most significant influence Vietnam, a small and open economy, has been significantly affected by the US’s UMP during the GFC and the recent COVID-19 pandemic Due to these circumstances, this study pursues the overarching goal of examining the influence of the US’s UMP on Vietnam's financial market and real economy during crisis periods From this general objective, the research proposes three specific objectives as follows:

Objective 1: This study examines how the Vietnamese financial market reacts to the

US’s UMP announcements during the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic UMPs are alternative measures to stimulate the economy when conventional tools are ineffective

Objective 2: This study attempts to analyze how the real economy of Vietnam responds to the shock of the US’s unconventional monetary policy

Objective 3: this research delves into the exploration of potential disparities in the international spillover effects of the US’s UMP on Vietnam’s financial market and real economy during two distinct periods of crisis: the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic

The main research results indicate that the financial market and real economy in Vietnam exhibit positive responses when the US employs UMP Specifically, the stock market increases when the US announces UMP during crises However, during the COVID-19 period, the market reacted earlier than the announcement of the US’s UMP In the GFC period, the market responded immediately to the US’s UMP information, and the upward trend lasted longer than in the GFC period Moreover, real GDP and inflation in Vietnam increased in response to the shocks of the US's UMP after ten months When comparing the influences of the US's UMP in different crises, it is clear that the shock caused by the Fed's balance sheet expansion during the GFC had a more significant impact on the real GDP and inflation in the Vietnamese economy than during the pandemic crisis

5 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS

A comprehensive study examining the far-reaching effects of US’s UMP on both the Vietnamese financial market and broader real economy yields significant contributions to both academic and practical contributions In detail, the study's findings provide:

Firstly, this research stands as one of the limited scholarly works that delve into the exploration of the influence exerted by the UMP of the United States on a frontier market, specifically Vietnam Frontier markets, such as Vietnam, are less mature than emerging markets and often show rapid economic growth, making them an interesting area of study in the context of international monetary policy spillover effects This research aims to fill this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the UMP’s impact on Vietnam’s financial market and real economy Furthermore, the findings of this study could have significant implications for the development of effective monetary policies and investment strategies in frontier markets Therefore, this research not only contributes to academic knowledge but also has practical relevance for economic policy and investment decision-making

Secondly, this research makes a significant contribution to the existing body of literature by providing a comparative analysis of the potential differences in the effects of the US’s UMP during two distinct periods of economic crisis: the GFC and the COVID-19 pandemic The UMP, which was employed by the Fed during both crises as a response mechanism However, the nature of these crises was fundamentally different - the GFC was primarily a financial crisis, while the COVID-19 pandemic was a health crisis that led to an economic downturn These differences in the nature and context of the crises could potentially lead to variations in the effects of the UMP By analyzing these variations, this study provides empirical evidence on how the impacts of UMP can differ across different crisis contexts Furthermore, the findings of this research could have implications for other countries, particularly those with economies that are intricately linked to the US economy Thus, this research has both academic and practical relevance, contributing to the literature on international monetary policy transmission and informing policy decisions in the real world

Thirdly, this research delves into the impact of the US’s UMP on Vietnam's financial system and real economy by employing a multifaceted approach Instead of relying on a single measure, the study utilizes a range of carefully chosen proxies to capture the complex effects of the US's UMP These proxies might include metrics like interest rates, stock market indices, exchange rates, and economic growth figures By incorporating this diverse set of data points, the study offers a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of how US monetary policy decisions ripple through the Vietnamese economy This in-depth analysis not only contributes to the broader academic understanding of international monetary policy transmission mechanisms but also provides valuable insights for policymakers in both developed and developing economies By understanding how US UMP impacts Vietnam, policymakers can make more informed decisions regarding their own monetary and fiscal policies, potentially mitigating risks or capitalizing on opportunities presented by the global economic landscape

Firstly, the study has demonstrated the response of the financial market to US’s UMP announcements, thereby also highlighting the efficiency of the Vietnamese financial market, represented by the stock market With this result, investors can proactively choose the timing of stock transactions based on information related to monetary policy In addition, investors can select stocks from sectors that are less volatile or benefit during periods of crisis

Secondly, the study also demonstrates that the Vietnamese economy benefits when the

US implements an expansionary monetary policy This is due to the increased inflow of capital, which in turn leads to higher asset prices and stimulates economic growth for the country As a result, Vietnam should fully utilize these capital inflows to drive its national development

In terms of method, this research provides several improvements on previous studies It examines the results (related to research question 2) with various measurement factors for the US’s UMP to ensure the model's robustness, including the total asset of the Fed's balance sheet and shadow short rate introduced by (Wu & Xia, 2016, 2020) The use of such different elements as a proxy for the US’s UMP is essential because the only use of one factor, such as the total asset of the Fed's balance sheet, might be subject to criticism, such as it is not suitable to some extent to proxy for UMP Implementing traditional monetary policy also expanded the Fed's balance sheet; therefore, it is not easy to determine when UMP is a conventional monetary policy Therefore, this study must use another factor, the shadow short rate measured by (Wu & Xia, 2016, 2020) for the US

(SSR), reflecting different stances of monetary policies in this country This study employs exogenous variables to proxy for the number of monthly new confirmed cases of COVID-

19 Using such variables helps emphasize the phase of the pandemic crisis, which is very different from the previous crises, as well as clarifying the impacts of the pandemic crisis on the economy in the research period.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Constructing and implementing unconventional monetary policies suitable

Unconventional monetary policies are typically employed during periods of crisis when conventional monetary policy tools become impractical, particularly in situations of near-zero policy interest rates This can lead to a decrease in the general interest rate, a phenomenon observed in Japan over several decades Bernanke (2022) attributed this trend to a long-term decline in the average level of interest rates This decline is partly due to lower inflation, resulting in a general level of interest rates that is much lower than in the past, even when monetary policy is not stimulating the economy This significantly reduces the ability of the Federal Reserve and other central banks to cut interest rates to bolster the economy during downturns This is particularly relevant in the context of the current global economy, which is fraught with uncertainties Consequently, it is imperative to research and prepare the necessary conditions for Vietnam to implement unconventional monetary policies in the future To do this, regulatory agencies need to prepare for the following tasks:

Firstly, developing the financial instrument market to lay the groundwork for quantitative easing One of the strategies employed by the SBV to regulate the money supply involves open market operations, with the assets traded being bills and government bonds In certain instances, the SBV has issued its own bills These instruments are safe and highly liquid; however, in the context of UMP, the central bank purchases assets (bonds) from financial institutions and businesses These assets carry a higher risk than those issued by the government According to Nguyễn and Hồ (2020), Vietnam has not yet utilized this instrument to regulate UMP alongside CMP The primary reason is the development of the financial system, specifically, the stock market Consequently, regulatory agencies need to foster a large, transparent financial market for high-quality financial products issued by reputable domestic organizations To achieve this, the following tasks must be undertaken: (i) Establish a robust regulatory framework that ensures transparency, protects investors, and maintains market integrity This could encompass regulations on disclosure requirements, trading practices, and market abuse (ii) Develop a reliable and efficient market infrastructure, which includes trading platforms, clearing and settlement systems, and depositories (iii) Encourage the diversification of financial instruments Offering a wide array of instruments such as government bonds, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, and commercial papers can attract a more diverse investor base (iv) Promote financial literacy among potential investors Understanding the benefits and risks of different financial instruments is crucial for market development These are the essential foundations for Vietnam to be able to implement quantitative easing tools when necessary

Secondly, enhance forward guidance tools, especially commitments on interest rates, to maintain public confidence (such as investors' businesses) Forward guidance tools are implemented through the central bank’s announcements about intentions in the future monetary policy These policy orientations will majorly impact the public’s long-term interest rate expectations, thereby affecting investment and consumption trends For many years, the SBV has also implemented Forward guidance through two important policies: (i) credit growth (the State Bank assigns credit growth limits to commercial banks) and (ii) stabilizing the exchange rate (giving a message about the exchange rate between USD/VND) Regarding interest rates, it still depends a lot on the supply and demand of capital in the market

To implement forward guidance tools, SBV should conduct the following tasks: (i) SBV should strive to build and maintain credibility This tool will be ineffective if market participants do not believe the central bank will follow through on its forward guidance (ii) SBV should provide clear and concise information about its future policy intentions This can reduce uncertainty and help market participants make informed decisions (iii) SBV should ensure its forward guidance is consistent with its other communications and actions Inconsistent messages can confuse market participants and undermine the effectiveness of forward guidance (iv) SBV should be transparent about its monitoring of economic indicators and how they will influence future policy decisions, and (v) while providing clear guidance is essential, the central bank should also retain some flexibility to adjust its policy as economic conditions change

Finally, the SBV should always ensure the role of expansion of lender of last resort facilities in any context This is a vital role of central banks in any crisis In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the SBV has also performed this role well by continuously adjusting to reduce operating interest rates such as refinancing interest rates or discount rates, ceiling savings interest rates to contribute to lowering lending interest rates of credit institutions for customers In addition to reducing operating interest rates, on August 6,

2020, the SBV also announced a reduction in the compulsory reserve deposit interest rate of credit institutions; on March 13, 2020, the State Bank issued Circular No 01/2020/TT-NHNN on credit institutions, foreign bank branches restructuring the debt repayment term, exempting, reducing interest, fees, keeping the same debt group to support customers affected by the COVID-19 epidemic These decisions in the context of the epidemic have helped to create conditions for credit institutions to support businesses and individuals affected by the epidemic to access cheap capital through lowering lending interest rates and reducing financial burdens, as well as improving and maintaining the business production activities of businesses.

Developing the financial market to increase the attraction of foreign

The empirical findings from this study shed light on the Vietnamese financial market, particularly the stock market, in response to announcements made by the United States, which exhibits a semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis This means that the stock prices reflect not only the historical information, but also the publicly available information, such as the official statements of the Fed regarding its UMP actions Moreover, the study reveals that the Fed’s balance sheet shocks, which capture the unexpected changes in the Fed’s balance sheet due to its forward guidance, have a positive effect on the foreign capital inflows into Vietnam This implies that the US’s influences the cross-border portfolio allocation decisions of foreign investors Therefore, with the most significant weight in the MSCI’s frontier market index basket and expectations being raised to the emerging market group shortly Vietnam needs to accelerate the process of upgrading the market such as:

Transparency: Enhancing transparency is crucial Vietnam should ensure that financial information, corporate disclosures, and market data are readily accessible to investors Clear reporting standards and timely dissemination of relevant information build investor confidence

Investor Rights Protection: Strengthening investor protection mechanisms is essential This involves enforcing laws that safeguard shareholders’ rights, prevent insider trading, and promote fair treatment of all investors

Market manipulation enforcement: Rigorous enforcement of market manipulation is vital Regulatory bodies should actively monitor trading activities, investigate irregularities, and impose penalties on violators A robust legal framework is necessary to maintain market integrity

(ii) Improving foreign investor accessibility

Lifting restrictions on foreign ownership: Removing or relaxing restrictions on foreign ownership of Vietnamese companies encourages foreign capital inflows Investors seek opportunities where they can participate meaningfully in a company’s growth

Streamlining capital flows: Simplifying administrative procedures for foreign investment facilitates capital inflows Efficient processes for remittances, repatriation, and currency conversion enhance investor confidence

Trading systems: Upgrading trading platforms ensures seamless execution of orders Faster order matching, reduced latency, and improved liquidity attract both domestic and foreign investors

Clearing and settlement systems: Efficient clearing and settlement processes minimize transaction risks Real-time settlement, automated reconciliation, and secure custody services enhance market efficiency.

Monitoring the US’s monetary policy and adjusting its policy to respond to

The main research findings showed that Vietnam's output and price index are closely correlated with the conduct of the US’s UMP, so the importance of closely monitoring and responding to global economic developments when making domestic policy decisions should be emphasized Policymakers must carefully balance the benefits of expansionary monetary policy with the potential risks of inflation and exchange rate volatility while also working to promote long-term economic growth and stability More specifically, the policy recommendations for the State Bank of Vietnam and the government are as follows:

Firstly, the Vietnamese government and the SBV should closely monitor the monetary policy decisions of the Federal Reserve and adjust their policies accordingly Additionally, it is crucial for the Vietnamese government and the SBV to collaborate closely with other international financial institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, to exchange information and best practices By doing so, Vietnam can stay informed about global economic trends and adapt its monetary policies accordingly Furthermore, the SBV should consider implementing targeted measures to support specific sectors of the economy, such as providing low-interest loans to small and medium-sized enterprises or offering incentives for investment in high-tech industries These efforts would contribute to a more resilient and diversified Vietnamese economy

Secondly, the State Bank of Vietnam should closely monitor inflation rates to ensure that the expansionary monetary policy does not lead to a sustained price increase If inflation becomes a concern, the central bank may need to adjust its monetary policy stance to prevent further price increases Moreover, it is essential for the SBV to engage in regular dialogue with experts, economists, and industry leaders to assess the impact of inflation on various sectors By maintaining an open and transparent communication channel, the central bank can make informed decisions that benefit the overall economy

Finally, to reduce the vulnerability of the Vietnamese economy to external shocks, the Vietnamese government should work to diversify its economy This could involve promoting domestic industries and increasing trade with other countries However, diversification should not be limited to traditional sectors alone The government should actively explore emerging industries, invest in research and development, and foster innovation By creating an ecosystem that encourages entrepreneurship and technological advancements, Vietnam can enhance its economic resilience and adaptability Additionally, the government should prioritize sustainable development and environmental protection, as these factors play a crucial role in ensuring long-term economic stability By investing in renewable energy sources, promoting eco-friendly practices, and safeguarding natural resources, Vietnam can further enhance its economic prospects and reduce dependence on external factors.

Focus on managing the potential risks of foreign capital flows and market

The research results showed that the implementation of the US's UMP would increase capital flows into Vietnam, which would contribute to increasing asset prices Faced with this opportunity to attract foreign capital, the SBV should closely track foreign capital inflows, recognize the vital role that capital flows play in the transmission of monetary shocks, and implement policies to manage potential risks associated with these flows, such as exchange rate volatility, because the research results showed that the expansion of UMP in the US led to a surge in capital flows to Vietnam In addition, with the surge of portfolio capital inflows to Vietnam, the Vietnamese government may need to consider implementing policies to encourage more long-term, stable foreign investment in the country rather than short-term speculative investment that can lead to market instability This could involve implementing policies to support domestic industries and increase access to credit for small and medium-sized enterprises, which can help to attract more long-term investors In addition, the State Securities Commission of Vietnam should continue to promote policies that support the development of the stock market, such as improving market transparency, promoting good corporate governance, and reducing barriers to entry A well-functioning stock market can attract more long-term investors and help to promote economic growth Besides, the Vietnamese government and the State Securities Commission may need to implement targeted policies to support individual investors negatively affected by market volatility resulting from capital flows This could include measures to protect small investors from market risks or policies encouraging more diversified investment portfolios

Moreover, the SBV should continue to monitor inflation rates closely and adjust monetary policy accordingly The indirect increase of GDP through the increase in capital inflow into the Vietnamese stock market can lead to inflationary pressures, and the central bank may need to implement policy measures to prevent sustained price increases

Overall, due to the importance of managing the potential risks associated with foreign capital flows and market volatility while also working to promote long-term economic growth and stability, policymakers must carefully balance the benefits of foreign investment with the potential risks to ensure that the Vietnamese economy remains resilient and sustainable over the long term.

Building resilience and promoting economic self-sufficiency in the face of

In the context of an increasingly interconnected global economy, the Vietnamese government must proactively address the challenges posed by external shocks These shocks can take various forms, including financial crises, pandemics, or sudden shifts in international trade dynamics To build resilience and promote economic self-sufficiency, Vietnam should adopt a multifaceted approach that encompasses both short-term measures and long-term strategies

Firstly, the Vietnamese government should recognize the importance of building resilience This involves not only reacting to crises but also proactively preparing for them

By closely monitoring global economic trends and collaborating with international organizations, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Vietnam can stay informed about potential risks and vulnerabilities Additionally, the government should establish a dedicated task force responsible for assessing and mitigating external shocks This task force would work closely with relevant ministries, research institutions, and industry experts to develop contingency plans and implement timely interventions

Secondly, policies that support domestic industries are crucial The Vietnamese government should prioritize sectors that contribute significantly to the country’s GDP and employment For instance, investing in healthcare infrastructure and medical research can enhance the nation’s ability to respond to health-related crises Similarly, promoting innovation and technological development across various industries—such as agriculture, manufacturing, and services—will foster economic diversification and reduce reliance on a few vulnerable sectors By providing targeted incentives, tax breaks, and research grants, the government can encourage private enterprises and startups to drive innovation and create new economic opportunities

Thirdly, improving access to credit for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is essential SMEs play a vital role in the Vietnamese economy, but they often face challenges in securing financing The government should collaborate with financial institutions to design flexible credit programs tailored to SMEs’ needs These programs could include low-interest loans, credit guarantees, and capacity-building initiatives By empowering SMEs, Vietnam can enhance its economic resilience and create a more inclusive and dynamic business environment

Fourthly, diversification remains a key strategy While traditional sectors like manufacturing and tourism contribute significantly to Vietnam’s economy, overreliance on them can be risky The government should actively explore emerging sectors, such as renewable energy, biotechnology, and digital services Investing in research and development, supporting startups, and facilitating technology transfer will accelerate the transition toward a more diversified economy Moreover, cross-sectoral collaboration— where industries share knowledge and resources—can lead to innovative solutions and new growth opportunities

In addition, the SBV should continue to monitor inflation rates closely and swift adjustments to monetary policy are crucial to prevent sustained price increases The higher response of the Vietnamese economy to the global financial crisis highlights the need for the central bank to remain vigilant and ready to take action to prevent sustained price increases.

Investors consider selecting investment opportunities in the context of

In the ever-evolving landscape of global financial markets, investors face a complex web of factors that influence their investment decisions Among these, monetary policy fluctuations play a pivotal role Let’s delve into several investment strategies that investors should consider in response to significant changes in monetary policy with research results, when developing countries implement UMP, investors can consider investment opportunities such as:

(i) Investing in stocks less affected by the market During times of heightened market volatility, investors seek refuge in defensive stocks These stocks belong to sectors that tend to be less sensitive to economic cycles and market swings Examples include healthcare companies, consumer staples, and utility providers By allocating a portion of their portfolio to defensive stocks, investors can mitigate risk during uncertain times (ii) When the Fed implements UMP, such as quantitative easing or negative interest rates, investors can capitalize on specific opportunities like immediate market boost or long-term trends Expansive monetary policy announcements often lead to an initial surge in stock markets Investors should closely monitor policy statements and act swiftly to take advantage of this upward momentum While the immediate impact is significant, expansive policies can sustain market growth over an extended period Investors must set clear profit targets and exit points to optimize their gains

(iii) Consider the trend of foreign capital flows into the stock market to choose the holding period The flow of foreign capital into frontier markets significantly influences stock prices When foreign investment pours into the Vietnamese stock market, it tends to drive prices higher Investors may choose longer holding periods during such inflow phases Conversely, if foreign capital reverses out of Vietnam due to global uncertainties or local factors, investors should reevaluate their portfolio allocation Reducing exposure to stocks during capital flight can protect against losses If the capital flow reverses out of Vietnam, consider reducing the proportion of stocks in the investment portfolio

(iv) Monitor changes in domestic monetary policy While global monetary policies impact all markets, domestic monetary policy decisions have a rapid and pronounced effect on local exchanges Investors should closely track changes in Vietnam’s central bank policies, interest rates, and liquidity measures For example, A sudden rate hike or cut can trigger market reactions Investors should anticipate such moves and adjust their portfolios accordingly The SBV liquidity injections or withdrawals can influence market sentiment Investors should stay informed about liquidity conditions Changes in the Vietnamese dong’s exchange rate can impact export-oriented companies and foreign investors Hedging strategies may be necessary.

LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Although the study raised questions about research hypotheses and used proper research methods to solve the above problems, this study still has certain limitations

First, the study only considers the stock market without an in-depth analysis of the bond and foreign exchange markets It focuses on the Vietnamese stock market, not expanding the comparison with other countries Besides, the calculation of the expected return of the stock is only based on the popular model like the market and risk-adjusted model or market-adjusted model, not using more complex models such as CAPM, Fama- French to analyze more closely the difference in business size as well as other factors affecting the profitability of stocks

Second, as mentioned above, the US is a country that has a significant influence on the global economy; the remaining developed countries also have specific roles This study only considers the impact of the US’s UMP on the Vietnamese stock market, not considering the UMP policies of other countries or regions such as the European Union, the

Third, the object of this research is open economy, small and frontier markets

Although Vietnam is the only country in Southeast Asia that satisfies this condition, to make the study more comprehensive and the results more convincing, the analysis should be extended to more countries that are frontier markets in Asia or the world These countries should have similar macroeconomic situations and monetary policy management

Finally, data from 2007 to 2022 were used to conduct this research Even though there was sufficient time for time series in monthly data for SVAR models, more data would be more beneficial for the findings Due to Vietnam's statistical issues, it has been difficult for this study to gather all necessary statistics with high reliability

The limitations of the study also suggest suggestions for future research, such as expanding into the bond and foreign exchange markets, using more complex models to determine the expected returns of stocks, and expanding the scope of research in other countries

Chapter 5 provides the conclusions and policy implications of the research on the spillover effects of the US's UMP on Vietnam's financial market and the real economy The significant findings are as follows: (i) The Vietnamese stock market positively reacts to the US’s UMP announcements, and the market's responses during the GFC and COVID-19 pandemic have some differences, with varying sector performances (ii) Expansionary UMP in the US positively affects Vietnam's output and price indexes, particularly GDP and CPI The impact on GDP is more substantial than on CPI, and risk aversion influences both indicators Capital inflows resulting from the US's UMP also caused a temporary rise in Vietnam's stock prices Regarding the differences in spillover effects during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic, the study found that the impact of UMP on Vietnam was generally two times higher during the GFC

The research contributes to empirical evidence on the instant response of the stock market reactions It compares the effects of crises and the literature on UMP spillover effects on small, open, and frontier markets like Vietnam Highlights the importance of monitoring global economic developments and managing risks associated with foreign capital flows and market volatility

Policy implications include monitoring the US and developing countries' macro policies, implementing UMP tools for market confidence, and attracting foreign investment Limitations involve focusing on the stock market and suggesting future research to consider other markets and complex models Expansionary UMP in the US positively affects Vietnam's output and price indexes, particularly GDP and CPI The impact on GDP is more substantial than on CPI, and risk aversion influences both indicators Vietnam's stock prices

Furthermore, there is room for further research to explore other transmission channels and extend the study to more frontier markets in Asia or globally

Acharya, V V., Eisert, T., Eufinger, C., & Hirsch, C (2019) Whatever it takes: The real effects of unconventional monetary policy The Review of Financial Studies, 32(9), 3366-3411 Aùt-Sahalia, Y., Andritzky, J., Jobst, A., Nowak, S., & Tamirisa, N (2012) Market response to policy initiatives during the global financial crisis Journal of International Economics, 87(1), 162-177

Alessi, L., & Kerssenfischer, M (2019) The response of asset prices to monetary policy shocks: stronger than thought Journal of Applied Econometrics, 34(5), 661-672

Alper, K., Altunok, F., Çapacıoğlu, T., & Ongena, S (2020) The effect of unconventional monetary policy on cross-border bank loans: Evidence from an emerging market European

Altavilla, C., Carboni, G., & Motto, R (2021) Asset purchase programmes and financial markets: lessons from the euro area International Journal of Central Banking, 17(4), 1-48

Ambler, S., & Rumler, F (2019) The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy announcements in the euro area: An event and econometric study Journal of International

Money and Finance, 94, 48-61 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.02.007

Anaya, P., Hachula, M., & Offermanns, C J (2017) Spillovers of US unconventional monetary policy to emerging markets: The role of capital flows Journal of International Money and Finance, 73, 275-295

Andreou, C K., Dimic, N., Piljak, V., & Savvides, A (2022) Unconventional monetary policy and international equity capital flows to emerging markets European Financial Management, 28(2), 482-509

Andrikopoulos, P., Gregoriou, G N., & Kallinterakis, V (2016) Handbook of Frontier Markets:

Evidence from Asia and International Comparative Studies Academic Press

Anh, P T H., Hằng, L M., Ngoọc, H M., Giang, Đ T., Nhâm, P T., & Bách, T N (2023) Tác động tràn của chính sách tiền tệ Mỹ đến thị trường tài chính Việt Nam Tạp Chí Ngân Hàng https://tapchinganhang.gov.vn/tac-dong-tran-cua-chinh-sach-tien-te-my-den-thi- truong-tai-chinh-viet-nam.htm

Anzuini, A., & Rossi, L (2022) Unconventional monetary policies and expectations on economic variables Empirical Economics, 1-17

Apergis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Cooray, A (2020) Monetary policy and commodity markets:

Unconventional versus conventional impact and the role of economic uncertainty

International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101536

Apostolou, A., & Beirne, J (2019) Volatility spillovers of unconventional monetary policy to emerging market economies Economic Modelling, 79, 118-129

Aòhoff, S., Belke, A., & Osowski, T (2021) Unconventional monetary policy and inflation expectations in the Euro area Economic Modelling, 102, 105564

Assoumou-Ella, G., Bastidon, C., & Bonijoly, B (2022) Fed tapering announcements: Impact on

Middle Eastern and African financial markets Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101558

Banerjee, K., & Goyal, A (2020) Monetary spillovers and real exchange rate misalignments in emerging markets International Journal of Emerging Markets

Bank of England (2020) Monetary policy Retrieved January 25, 2024 from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy

Bauer, M., & Rudebusch, G D (2014) The signaling channel for Federal Reserve bond purchases

International Journal of Central Banking

Bauer, M D., & Neely, C J (2014) International channels of the Fed's unconventional monetary policy Journal of International Money and Finance, 44, 24-46

Baumeister, C., & Benati, L (2010) Unconventional monetary policy and the great recession-

Estimating the impact of a compression in the yield spread at the zero lower bound

Begg, D., Vernasca, G., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R (2014) Economics McGraw Hill

Bekaert, G., Hoerova, M., & Duca, M L J J o M E (2013) Risk, uncertainty and monetary policy 60(7), 771-788

Belke, A., & Klose, J (2013) Modifying Taylor reaction functions in the presence of the zero‐lower‐bound—Evidence for the ECB and the Fed Economic Modelling, 35, 515-527 Benigno, P., Canofari, P., Di Bartolomeo, G., & Messori, M (2022) The European monetary policy responses during the pandemic crisis Open Economies Review, 1-19

Benninga, S (2014) Financial Modeling (4th ed.) The MIT Press

Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., & Watson, M W (2004) Oil shocks and aggregate macroeconomic behavior: The role of monetary policy: A reply Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(2), 287-291 https://doi.org/https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/30/article/53947/summary

Bernanke, B S (2010) Monetary policy and the housing bubble Retrieved January 21, 2022 from https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ypfs_docs/1/

Bernanke, B S (2013, November 19, 2013) Communication and Monetary Policy Retrieved

April, 13, 2024 from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20131119a.htm

Bernanke, B S (2022) 21st Century Monetary Policy: The Federal Reserve from the Great

Inflation to COVID-19 WW Norton & Company

Bhattarai, S., & Neely, C J (2022) An analysis of the literature on international unconventional monetary policy Journal of economic literature, 60(2), 527-597

Bluwstein, K., & Canova, F (2018) Beggar-thy-neighbor? The international effects of ECB unconventional monetary policy measures 45th issue (September 2016) of the International Journal of Central Banking

Bowdler, C., & Radia, A (2012) Unconventional monetary policy: the assessment Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(4), 603-621

Bowman, D., Londono, J M., & Sapriza, H (2015) US unconventional monetary policy and transmission to emerging market economies Journal of International Money and Finance,

Bowman, M W (2022, October 12, 2022) Forward Guidance as a Monetary Policy Tool:

Considerations for the Current Economic Environment Retrieved April, 13, 2024 from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bowman20221012a.htm

Breedon, F., Chadha, J S., & Waters, A (2012) The financial market impact of UK quantitative easing Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(4), 702-728

Breitenlechner, M., Gründler, D., & Scharler, J (2021) Unconventional monetary policy announcements and information shocks in the US Journal of Macroeconomics, 67,

Brooks, C (2019) Introductory econometrics for finance Cambridge university press

Bruno, V., & Shin, H S J J o m e (2015) Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy 71, 119-132

Buch, C M., Bussiere, M., Goldberg, L., & Hills, R (2019) The international transmission of monetary policy Journal of International Money and Finance, 91, 29-48

Burriel, P., & Galesi, A (2018) Uncovering the heterogeneous effects of ECB unconventional monetary policies across euro area countries European Economic Review, 101, 210-229 Campbell, J Y., Lo, A W., & MacKinlay, A C (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets

Canzoneri, M., Cumby, R., Diba, B., & Kim, Y (2021) Did the Unconventional Monetary Policy of the US Hurt Emerging Markets? Open Economies Review, 32(2), 231-257

Carhart, M M (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance The Journal of finance, 52(1),

Carrera, C., & Ramírez-Rondán, N R (2020) Effects of us quantitative easing on latin american economies Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(8), 1989-2011

Cecioni, M., Ferrero, G., & Secchi, A (2011) Unconventional monetary policy in theory and in practice In

Cenedese, G., & Elard, I (2021) Unconventional monetary policy and the portfolio choice of international mutual funds Journal of International Money and Finance, 115, 102357 Chebbi, T (2018) The impact of unconventional monetary policy shocks on the crude oil futures market Journal of Energy Markets, Forthcoming

Chen, H., & Tsang, A (2020) Impact of US monetary policy rate shock and other external shocks on the Hong Kong economy: A factor‐augmented vector autoregression approach Pacific Economic Review, 25(1), 3-20

Chen, J., Murry, C., & Schmitt, K R (2022) Frontier Markets: Meaning, History, Examples

Retrieved January 23, 2024 from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/frontier- market.asp#:~:text=A%20frontier%20market%20is%20a,known%20as%20pre%2Demergi ng%20markets

Chen, M J., Griffoli, M T M., & Sahay, M R (2014) Spillovers from United States monetary policy on emerging markets: different this time? International Monetary Fund https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2014/240/article-A001-en.xml

Chen, Q., Filardo, A., He, D., & Zhu, F (2016) Financial crisis, US unconventional monetary policy and international spillovers Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 62-81 Chen, Q., Filardo, A J., He, D., & Zhu, F (2012) International spillovers of central bank balance sheet policies BIS Paper(66p)

Chen, Q., Lombardi, M J., Ross, A., & Zhu, F (2017) Global impact of US and euro area unconventional monetary policies: a comparison

Cheng, C., & Sun, M (2013) A Financial Crisis Study: How Fiscal And Monetary Policy Affects

The Stock Market Returns Considering The Specific Counties 1–48 (Lund University, Department of Economic Administration)

Clarida, R., Duygan-Bump, B., & Scotti, C (2021) The COVID-19 crisis and the Federal

Reserve's policy response [Finance and Economics Discussion Series] Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2021.035

Corrado, C J (2011) Event studies: A methodology review Accounting & Finance, 51(1), 207-

Cortes, G S., Gao, G P., Silva, F B., & Song, Z (2022) Unconventional monetary policy and disaster risk: Evidence from the subprime and COVID–19 crises Journal of International Money and Finance, 122, 102543

Cushman, D O., & Zha, T (1997) Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange rates Journal of monetary economics, 39(3), 433-448

Dahlhaus, T., & Vasishtha, G (2014) The impact of US monetary policy normalization on capital flows to emerging-market economies

Dahlhaus, T., & Vasishtha, G (2020) Monetary policy news in the US: Effects on emerging market capital flows Journal of International Money and Finance, 109, 102251

Danh, H C (2016) Tác động của chính sách tiền tệ phi truyền thống của các nước phát triển lên các nước đang phát triển và gợi ý cho Việt Nam Tạp chí Khoa học - Đại học Thủ Dầu Một,

Dées, S., & Galesi, A (2021) The Global Financial Cycle and US monetary policy in an interconnected world Journal of International Money and Finance, 115, 102395

Dees, S., Mauro, F d., Pesaran, M H., & Smith, L V (2007) Exploring the international linkages of the euro area: a global VAR analysis Journal of applied econometrics, 22(1), 1-38 Dornbusch, R (1976) Exchange rate expectations and monetary policy Journal of International

Eickmeier, S., & Ng, T (2011) How do credit supply shocks propagate internationally? A GVAR approach

Eksi, O., & Tas, B K O (2017) Unconventional monetary policy and the stock market’s reaction to Federal Reserve policy actions The North American Journal of Economics and Finance,

El-Shagi, M., & Von Schweinitz, G (2016) Qual var revisited: good forecast, bad story Journal of applied economics, 19(2), 293-321

El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Mansi, S A., & Sy, O (2023) Event studies in international finance research Journal of International Business Studies, 54(2), 344-364

Eser, F., & Schwaab, B (2016) Evaluating the impact of unconventional monetary policy measures: Empirical evidence from the ECB׳ s Securities Markets Programme Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 147-167

European Central Bank (2021) What is monetary policy? https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/educational/explainers/tell-me/html/what-is-monetary- policy.en.html

Evanoff, D D., Kaufman, G G., & Malliaris, A G (2018) Innovative federal reserve policies during the great financial crisis (Vol 15) World Scientific

Evgenidis, A., & Papadamou, S (2021) The impact of unconventional monetary policy in the euro area Structural and scenario analysis from a Bayesian VAR International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5684-5703

Falagiarda, M., McQuade, P., & Tirpák, M (2015) Spillovers from the ECB's non-standard monetary policies on non-euro area EU countries: evidence from an event-study analysis

Fama, E F (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work The Journal of finance, 25(2), 383-417

Fama, E F., & French, K R (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model Journal of Financial

Fassas, A P., & Papadamou, S (2018) Unconventional monetary policy announcements and risk aversion: evidence from the US and European equity markets The European Journal of Finance, 24(18), 1885-1901

Fed (2015, December 16, 2015 ) What is forward guidance, and how is it used in the Federal

Reserve’s monetary policy? Retrieved April, 13, 2024 from https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/what-is-forward-guidance-how-is-it-used-in-the- federal-reserve-monetary-policy.htm

Fed (2024, March 07, 2024 ) The Federal Reserve's balance sheet Retrieved April, 12, 2024 from https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_fedsbalancesheet.htm

Federal Reserve (2021) The Fed Explained What the Central Bank Does Retrieved January 25,

2024 from https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/the-fed-explained.htm

Feldkircher, M., Huber, F., & Pfarrhofer, M (2021) Measuring the effectiveness of US monetary policy during the COVID‐19 recession Scottish journal of political economy, 68(3), 287-

Fendel, R., & Neugebauer, F (2020) Country-specific euro area government bond yield reactions to ECB’s non-standard monetary policy program announcements German Economic Review, 21(4), 417-474

Ferreira, E., & Serra, A P (2022) Price effects of unconventional monetary policy announcements on European securities markets Journal of International Money and Finance, 122, 102558 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102558

Fic, T (2013) The spillover effects of unconventional monetary policies in major developed countries on developing countries United Nations, Department of Economic and Social

Fiebiger, B., & Lavoie, M (2021) Central bankers and the rationale for unconventional monetary policies: reasserting, renouncing or recasting monetarism? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(1), 37-59

Fleming, J M (1962) Domestic financial policies under fixed and under floating exchange rates

Fratzscher, M., Duca, M L., & Straub, R (2016) ECB unconventional monetary policy: Market impact and international spillovers IMF Economic Review, 64(1), 36-74 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2016.5

Fratzscher, M., Lo Duca, M., & Straub, R (2018) On the international spillovers of US quantitative easing The Economic Journal, 128(608), 330-377

Friedman, M (1970) A theoretical framework for monetary analysis journal of Political

Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., & Sack, B (2011a) The financial market effects of the

Federal Reserve’s large-scale asset purchases International Journal of Central Banking, 7(1), 45-52

Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., & Sack, B (2018) The financial market effects of the

Federal Reserve's large-scale asset purchases 24th issue (Mar 2011) of the International Journal of Central Banking

Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., & Sack, B P (2011b) Large-scale asset purchases by the

Federal Reserve: did they work? Economic Policy Review, 17(1), 41

Gai, P., & Tong, E (2022) Information spillovers of US monetary policy Journal of

Macroeconomics, 72, 103401 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2022.103401

Galariotis, E., Makrichoriti, P., & Spyrou, S (2018) The impact of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on expectations and sentiment Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 1-20

Galloppo, G., & Paimanova, V (2017) The impact of monetary policy on BRIC markets asset prices during global financial crises The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 66, 21-49

Gambacorta, L., Hofmann, B., & Peersman, G (2014) The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross‐country analysis Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(4), 615-642

Glick, R., & Leduc, S (2012) Central bank announcements of asset purchases and the impact on global financial and commodity markets Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(8), 2078-2101

Gopinath, G (2020) The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great

Depression Retrieved April 14, 2022 from https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/04/14/blog-weo-the-great-lockdown-worst- economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression

Guerello, C (2018) Conventional and unconventional monetary policy vs households income distribution: An empirical analysis for the Euro Area Journal of International Money and Finance, 85, 187-214

Gupta, R., & Marfatia, H A (2018) The impact of unconventional monetary policy shocks in the

US on emerging market REITs Journal of Real Estate Literature, 26(1), 175-188

Gürkaynak, R., Karasoy‐Can, H G., & Lee, S S (2019) Stock market's assessment of monetary policy transmission: The cash flow effect The Journal of finance

Haitsma, R., Unalmis, D., & De Haan, J (2016) The impact of the ECB's conventional and unconventional monetary policies on stock markets Journal of Macroeconomics, 48, 101-

Hofmann, B., & Bogdanova, B (2012) Taylor rules and monetary policy: a global'Great

Deviation'? BIS quarterly review September

Horváth, R., & Voslarova, K (2017) International spillovers of ECB’s unconventional monetary policy: the effect on Central Europe Applied Economics, 49(24), 2352-2364

Hosono, K., & Isobe, S (2014) The financial market impact of unconventional monetary policies in the US, the UK, the Eurozone, and Japan

Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L (2015) Digesting anomalies: An investment approach The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705

Ijiri, H., & Jinushi, T (2021) International Spillover Effects of Quantitative Easing Policy: A Case

Study on the US and Japan Applied Economics Letters, 1-5

Inoue, A., & Rossi, B (2019) The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on exchange rates Journal of International Economics, 118, 419-447

Inoue, T., & Okimoto, T (2022) International spillover effects of unconventional monetary policies of major central banks International Review of Financial Analysis, 79, 101968 International Monetary Fund (2020) How can interest rates be negative? Retrieved January 25,

2022 from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/03/what-are-negative- interest-rates-basics

Iyke, B N., & Maheepala, M (2022) Conventional monetary policy, COVID-19, and stock markets in emerging economies Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 76, 101883

Jackson, A (2021, 2024, February 13) Quantitative easing explained Retrieved April, 13 from

Quantitative easing explained Forbes Advisor https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/quantitative-easing-qe/

Jọger, J., & Grigoriadis, T (2017) The effectiveness of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policy: Comparative evidence from crisis and non-crisis Euro-area countries Journal of International Money and Finance, 78, 21-43

Janus, J (2020) Is ECB rocking the boat? Unconventional monetary policy in the EMU and volatility spillovers to Poland Eastern European Economics, 58(1), 50-67

Jawadi, F., Sousa, R M., & Traverso, R (2017) On the macroeconomic and wealth effects of unconventional monetary policy Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21(5), 1189-1204

Joyce, M., Tong, M., & Woods, R (2011) The United Kingdom’s quantitative easing policy: design, operation and impact Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin

Joyce, M A., Lasaosa, A., Stevens, I., & Tong, M (2011) The Financial Market Impact of

Quantitative Easing in the United Kingdom International Journal of Central Banking Kabundi, A., Loate, T., & Viegi, N (2020) Spillovers of the Conventional and Unconventional

Monetary Policy from the US to South Africa South African Journal of Economics, 88(4),

Kapetanios, G., Mumtaz, H., Stevens, I., & Theodoridis, K (2012) Assessing the economy‐wide effects of quantitative easing The Economic Journal, 122(564), F316-F347

Kaspereit, T (2021) Event studies with daily stock returns in Stata: Which command to use? The

Keynes, J M (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money ((2007 edition) ed.) Palgrave Macmillan

Kiendrebeogo, Y (2016) Unconventional monetary policy and capital flows Economic Modelling,

Kilian, L (2013) Structural vector autoregressions In Handbook of research methods and applications in empirical macroeconomics Edward Elgar Publishing

Kim, S., & Yang, D Y (2011) The impact of capital inflows on asset prices in emerging Asian economies: is too much money chasing too little good? Open Economies Review, 22, 293-

Kolari, J W., & Pynnonen, S (2011) Nonparametric rank tests for event studies Journal of

Kothari, S P., & Warner, J B (2007) Econometrics of event studies In Handbook of empirical corporate finance (pp 3-36) Elsevier

Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A (2011) The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates: channels and implications for policy

Krugman, P., & Wells, R (2018) Microeconomics Macmillan Learning https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=MAiLswEACAAJ

Lakdawala, A (2021) The growing impact of US monetary policy on emerging financial markets:

Evidence from India Journal of International Money and Finance, 119, 102478

Lân, C K., Tùng, T H., Anh, P Đ., Hiền, N T., Hương, T H D., Hương, V N., Long, N Đ.,

Nhàn, N T., Sáu, H T., & Tần, T V (2016) Chính sách tiền tệ phi truyền thống: kinh nghiệm quốc tế và khuyến nghị cho Việt Nam

Le, C., Vo, X V., Mullineux, A., & Nguyen, H (2022) SPILLOVERS OF GLOBAL LIQUIDITY

AND MONETARY POLICY DIVERGENCE FROM ADVANCED ECONOMIES TO

VIETNAM The Singapore Economic Review, 1-29 https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S0217590822500308

Lee, C.-C., Chen, M.-P., & Huang, C.-C (2020) The Effects Of US Unconventional Monetary

Policy On Asian Stock Markets The Singapore Economic Review, 65(04), 917-945

Li, Y D., İşcan, T B., & Xu, K (2010) The impact of monetary policy shocks on stock prices:

Evidence from Canada and the United States Journal of International Money and Finance,

Liu, H., Manzoor, A., Wang, C., Zhang, L., & Manzoor, Z (2020) The COVID-19 outbreak and affected countries stock markets response International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2800

Lloyd, S (2017) Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Interest Rate Channel: Signalling and

Lubys, J., & Panda, P (2021) US and EU unconventional monetary policy spillover on BRICS financial markets: an event study Empirica, 48(2), 353-371

Lutz, C (2015) The impact of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on investor sentiment Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, 89-105

MacDonald, M., & Popiel, M K (2020) Unconventional monetary policy in a small open economy Open Economies Review, 31(5), 1061-1115

MacKinlay, A C (1997) Event studies in economics and finance Journal of economic literature,

Madura, J (2021) Financial markets and institutions (13 ed.) Cengage learning

Mamatzakis, E., & Bermpei, T (2016) What is the effect of unconventional monetary policy on bank performance? Journal of International Money and Finance, 67, 239-263

Markowitz, H (1952) Portfolio Selection The Journal of finance, 7(1), 77-91 https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974

Meinusch, A., & Tillmann, P (2016) The macroeconomic impact of unconventional monetary policy shocks Journal of Macroeconomics, 47, 58-67

Mishkin, F S (1995) Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 3-10

Mishkin, F S (2022) The economics of money, banking, and financial markets Pearson

Mishra, M P., Moriyama, M K., N'Diaye, P M B., & Nguyen, L (2014) Impact of fed tapering announcements on emerging markets International Monetary Fund

Miyajima, K., Mohanty, M S., & Yetman, J (2014) Spillovers of US unconventional monetary policy to Asia: the role of long-term interest rates

MSCI (2023) Market classification Retrieved January 24, 2024 from https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/e7613c4f-f16c-b039-f69a-fbdaafed579f

Mukherjee, M., & Bhaduri, S N (2015) Spillover effects of quantitative easing: from the US to the BRICS Review of Market Integration, 7(2), 117-132

Mundell, R A (1963) Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 29(4), 475-485

Neely, C J (2015) Unconventional monetary policy had large international effects Journal of