Assignment on discourse analysis 2

Discourse can be spoken, written or in any other medium of expression.Discourse is a unit of language in use... Though it may have been looked at from different angles with somewhat cont

HANOI OPEN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGLISH -

ASSIGNMENT ON DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

HANOI, 2021

HANOI OPEN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGLISH -

Detachednumber

HANOI, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION……… ……….……1

CHAPTER II: DEVELOPMENT……….… ………1

2.1 Prove that the text is written language……….………7

2.1.1 Grammar……… ……7

2.1.2 Lexical density……….…….7

2.1.3 Situation………9

2.2 Find grammatical and lexical cohesive devices employed in the text………9

2.2.1 Grammatical cohesive devices……….….……9

2.2.2 Lexical cohesive devices……….12

2.3 English - Vietnamese translation……….……… ……….13

CHAPTER III: CONCLUSION……….…….……….…….…22

CHAPTER IV: REFERENCES……….…… ……23

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION Abstract

The first research on discourse can be traced back to British linguist J R Firth In the study released in 1935, Firth urged linguists to work on conversations since, inhis view, only by studying conversations can we understand language and its functions better (Malcolm Coulthard, 1977: 1) This was seen as a breakthrough inlanguage study as during this time language was studied in isolation from the context, with attention paid to language forms and structures

Under the influence of Bloomfield, and then Chomsky, linguists only focused

on formal and structural problems of language for many decades, and, for thisreason, meaning was put aside

It was not until the late 1950s that the first official studies on discourse appeared Harris (1952) was the person who mentioned the term discourse for the first time inhis article entitled Discourse Analysis It can be said that although Harris was the first to mention the term Discourse analysis, it was Mitchell who actually studied discourse first through his study on language in social settings Here are two of the very many definitions of discourse:

Discourse can be defined as a stretch of language consisting of several sentences,which are perceived as being related in some way Sentences can be related, not only in terms of the idea they share, but also in terms of the jobs they perform within the discourse - that is in terms of their functions

(Nunan D., 1993)Discourse is language that is functional - language that is doing some job in some context as opposed to isolated words or sentences Discourse can be spoken, written

or in any other medium of expression

Discourse is a unit of language in use It is not a grammatical unit, like a clause or asentence

Discourse is a semantic unit, a unit not of form but of meaning A discourse doesnot consist of sentences; it is realized by, or encoded in sentences.

(Halliday M.A.K & Hasan R., 1976)

In conclusion, discourse analysis is now universally recognized as a branch oflinguistics Though it may have been looked at from different angles with somewhatcontroversial views, it finds its unity in the belief that it deals with the largest unit oflanguage and that it investigates a unit of meaning in social settings, not as a unit ofform isolated from the context

The aim of this study is to point out the differences between spoken and written language, find grammatical and lexical cohesive devices employed in the text and assist translation Moreover, it helps us gain more knowledge about

discourse analysis

Keywords: context, discourse analysis, written language, spoken

language, grammatical and lexical cohesive devices, translation

CHAPTER II: DEVELOPMENT

Jack London or John Griffith London was an American novelist, journalist and social activist A pioneer of commercial fiction and American magazines, he wasone of the first American authors to become an international celebrity and earn a large fortune from writing He was also an innovator in the genre that would laterbecome known as science fiction

The Call of the Wild is a short adventure novel by Jack London, published in 1903 and set in Yukon, Canada, during the 1890s Klondike Gold Rush, when strong sleddogs were in high demand The central character of the novel is a dog named Buck.The story opens at a ranch in Santa Clara Valley, California, when Buck is stolen from his home and sold into service as a sled dog in Alaska He becomes

progressively more primitive and wild in the harsh environment, where he is forced

to fight to survive and dominate other dogs By the end, he sheds the veneer of civilization, and relies on primordial instinct and learned experience to emerge as aleader in the wild

The extract below in that novel:

“(1)To Buck’s surprise these dogs manifested no jealousy toward him (2)They seemed to share the kindliness and largeness of John Thornton (3)As Buck grew stronger they enticed him into all sorts of ridiculous games, in which Thornton himself could not forbear to join; and in this fashion Buck romped through his convalescence and into a new existence (4)Love, genuine passionate love, was hisfor the first time (5)This he had never experienced at Judge Miller’s down in the sun-kissed Santa Clara Valley (6)With the Judge’s sons, hunting and tramping, it had been a working partnership; with the Judge’s grandsons, a sort of pompous guardianship; and with the Judge himself, a stately and dignified friendship (7)But love that was feverish and burning, that was adoration, that was madness, ithad taken John Thornton to arouse

(8)This man had saved his life, which was something; but, further, he was the ideal master (9)Other men saw to the welfare of their dogs from a sense of duty and business expediency; he saw to the welfare of his as if they were his own children, because he could not help it (10)And he saw further (11)He never forgot a kindly greeting or a cheering word, and to sit down for a long talk with them (“gas” he called it) was as much his delight as theirs (12)He had a way of taking Buck’s headroughly between his hands, and resting his own head upon Buck’s, of shaking him back and forth, the while calling him ill names that to Buck were love names.(13)Buck knew no greater joy than that rough embrace and the sound of

murmured oaths, and at each jerk back and forth it seemed that his heart would be shaken out of his body, so great was its ecstasy (14)And when, released, he sprang to his feet, his mouth laughing, his eyes eloquent, his throat vibrant with unuttered sound, and in that fashion remained without movement, John Thornton would reverently exclaim, “God! you can all but speak!”

(15)Buck had a trick of love expression that was akin to hurt (16)He would often seize Thornton’s hand in his mouth and close so fiercely that the flesh bore the impress of his teeth for some time afterward (17)And as Buck understood the oaths to be love words, so the man understood this feigned bite for a caress.

(18)For the most part, however, Buck’s love was expressed in adoration (19)While

he went wild with happiness when Thornton touched him or spoke to him, he did not seek these tokens (20)Unlike Skeet, who was wont to shove her nose under Thornton’s hand and nudge and nudge till petted, or Nig, who would stalk up and rest his great head on Thornton’s knee, Buck was content to adore at a distance (21)He would lie by the hour, eager, alert, at Thornton’s feet, looking up into his face, dwelling upon it, studying it, following with keenest interest each fleeting expression, every movement or change of feature (22)Or, as chance might have it,

he would lie farther away, to the side or rear, watching the outlines of the man and the occasional movements of his body (23)And often, such was the communion in which they lived, the strength of Buck’s gaze would draw John Thornton’s head around, and he would return the gaze, without speech, his heart shining out of his eyes as Buck’s heart shone out

(24)For a long time after his rescue, Buck did not like Thornton to get out of his sight (25)From the moment he left the tent to when he entered it again, Buck wouldfollow at his heels (26)His transient masters since he had come into the Northland had bred in him a fear that no master could be permanent (27)He was afraid that Thornton would pass out of his life as Perrault and François and the Scotch half-breed had passed out (28)Even in the night, in his dreams, he was haunted by this fear (29)At such times he would shake off sleep and creep through the chill to the flap of the tent, where he would stand and listen to the sound of his master’s breathing

(30)But in spite of this great love he bore John Thornton, which seemed to bespeakthe soft civilizing influence, the strain of the primitive, which the Northland had aroused in him, remained alive and active (31)Faithfulness and devotion, things born of fire and roof, were his; yet he retained his wildness and wiliness (32)He was a thing of the wild, come in from the wild to sit by John Thornton’s fire, ratherthan a dog of the soft Southland stamped with the marks of generations of civilization (33)Because of his very great love, he could not steal from this man, but from any other man, in any other camp, he did not hesitate an instant; while thecunning with which he stole enabled him to escape detection.

(34)His face and body were scored by the teeth of many dogs, and he fought as fiercely as ever and more shrewdly (35)Skeet and Nig were too good-natured for quarrelling,—besides, they belonged to John Thornton; but the strange dog, no matter what the breed or valor, swiftly acknowledged Buck’s supremacy or found himself struggling for life with a terrible antagonist (36)And Buck was merciless (37)He had learned well the law of club and fang, and he never forewent an advantage or drew back from a foe he had started on the way to Death (38)He had lessoned from Spitz, and from the chief fighting dogs of the police and mail, and knew there was no middle course (39)He must master or be mastered; while to show mercy was a weakness (40)Mercy did not exist in the primordial life (41)It was misunderstood for fear, and such misunderstandings made for death (42)Kill or

be killed, eat or be eaten, was the law; and this mandate, down out of the depths of Time, he obeyed

(43)He was older than the days he had seen and the breaths he had drawn (44)He linked the past with the present, and the eternity behind him throbbed through him

in a mighty rhythm to which he swayed as the tides and seasons swayed (45)He sat

by John Thornton’s fire, a broadbreasted dog, white-fanged and long-furred; but behind him were the shades of all manner of dogs, half-wolves and wild wolves,

urgent and prompting, tasting the savor of the meat he ate, thirsting for the water hedrank, scenting the wind with him, listening with him and telling him the sounds made by the wild life in the forest, dictating his moods, directing his actions, lying down to sleep with him when he lay down, and dreaming with him and beyond himand becoming themselves the stuff of his dreams.

(46)So peremptorily did these shades beckon him, that each day mankind and the claims of mankind slipped farther from him (47)Deep in the forest a call was sounding, and as often as he heard this call, mysteriously thrilling and luring, he felt compelled to turn his back upon the fire and the beaten earth around it, and to plunge into the forest, and on and on, he knew not where or why; nor did he wonder where or why, the call sounding imperiously, deep in the forest (48)But as often as he gained the soft unbroken earth and the green shade, the love for John Thornton drew him back to the fire again

(49)Thornton alone held him (50)The rest of mankind was as nothing (51)Chance travellers might praise or pet him; but he was cold under it all, and from a too demonstrative man he would get up and walk away (52)When Thornton’s partners,Hans and Pete, arrived on the long-expected raft, Buck refused to notice them till helearned they were close to Thornton; after that he tolerated them in a passive sort ofway, accepting favors from them as though he favored them by accepting (53)Theywere of the same large type as Thornton, living close to the earth, thinking simply and seeing clearly; and ere they swung the raft into the big eddy by the saw-mill at Dawson, they understood Buck and his ways, and did not insist upon an intimacy such as obtained with Skeet and Nig

(54)For Thornton, however, his love seemed to grow and grow (55)He, aloneamong men, could put a pack upon Buck’s back in the summer travelling.(56)Nothing was too great for Buck to do, when Thornton commanded (57)One

day (they had grub-staked themselves from the proceeds of the raft and left Dawsonfor the head-waters of the Tanana) the men and dogs were sitting on the crest of a cliff which fell away, straight down, to naked bed-rock three hundred feet below (58)John Thornton was sitting near the edge, Buck at his shoulder (59)A thoughtless whim seized Thornton, and he drew the attention of Hans and Pete to the experiment he had in mind “Jump, Buck!” he commanded, sweeping his arm out and over the chasm (60)The next instant he was grappling with Buck on the extreme edge, while Hans and Pete were dragging them back into safety.”

2.1 Prove that the text is written language

2.1.1 Grammar

- The written text seems to have more information packed into it

(26)His transient masters since he had come into the Northland had bred in him afear that no master could be permanent

(27)He was afraid that Thornton would pass out of his life as Perrault and Françoisand the Scotch half-breed had passed out

(44)He linked the past with the present, and the eternity behind himthrobbed through him in a mighty rhythm to which he swayed as the tidesand seasons swayed

- Linguistically, the extract tends to consist of clauses that are internally complex.(3)As Buck grew stronger they enticed him into all sorts of ridiculous games, in which Thornton himself could not forbear to join; and in this fashion Buck rompedthrough his convalescence and into a new existence

(20) Unlike Skeet, who was wont to shove her nose under Thornton’s hand andnudge and nudge till petted, or Nig, who would stalk up and rest his great head onThornton’s knee, Buck was content to adore at a distance

(27)He was afraid that Thornton would pass out of his life as Perrault and François and the Scotch half-breed had passed out

(33)Because of his very great love, he could not steal from this man, but from any other man, in any other camp, he did not hesitate an instant; while the cunning withwhich he stole enabled him to escape detection.

- In written language an extensive set of markers exists to mark relationships between clauses (that complementisers, when/while temporal markers, logicalconnectors like besides, moreover, however, in spite of,etc.)

(19)While he went wild with happiness when Thornton touched him or spoke to

him, he did not seek these tokens

(52)When Thornton’s partners, Hans and Pete, arrived on the long-expected raft,

Buck refused to notice them till he learned they were close to Thornton; after that

he tolerated them in a passive sort of way, accepting favors from them as though he favored them by accepting

(56)Nothing was too great for Buck to do, when Thornton commanded

(60)The next instant he was grappling with Buck on the extreme edge, while Hansand Pete were dragging them back into safety

-In written language, rather heavily modified noun phrases are quite common: (26)His transient masters since he had come into the Northland had bred in him afear that no master could be permanent

- Passives, it-clefts or wh-clefts are easily found in the extract

(28)Even in the night, in his dreams, he was haunted by this fear

(34)His face and body were scored by the teeth of many dogs, and he fought

as fiercely as ever and more shrewdly

2.1.2 Lexical density

Written language displays a much higher ratio of content words to total

running words

E.g: Paragraph

“To Buck’s surprise these dogs manifested no jealousy toward him They seemed

to share the kindliness and largeness of John Thornton As Buck grew strongerthey enticed him into all sorts of ridiculous games, in which Thornton himself

could not forbear to join; and in this fashion Buck romped through his convalescence and into a new existence Love, genuine passionate love , was hisfor the first time This he had never experienced at Judge Miller’s down in the sun-kissed Santa Clara Valley With the Judge’s sons, hunting and tramping, it had been a working partnership; with the Judge’s grandsons, a sort of pompous guardianship; and with the Judge himself, a stately and dignified friendship Butlove that was feverish and burning, that was adoration, that was madness, it had taken John Thornton to arouse.”

=>The content/lexical words: 60/134 words

2.1.3 Situation

- No common situation Inferred from the text

-Words carry all shades of meaning

- Making assumptions about the reader’s state of knowledge

2.2 Find grammatical and lexical cohesive devices employed in the text 2.2.1 Grammatical cohesive devices

- Grammatical cohesive devices include reference, substitution, ellipsis andconjunction

a Reference

-Endophoric reference:

*Anaphoric reference:

-They(2),they(3) (refers to these dogs(1) )

-This (5) refer to Love, genuine passionate love(4)

-he(8)refer to This man(8)

-They(9) refer to dogs (9)

-it(11) refer to “gas” (11)

-He (8), (9),(10),(11), (12) refer to John Thornton

-he(14) refer to Buck (13) -he (16)refer to Buck

(15)

-they (23) refer to Buck and John Thornton

-he(21), (22), (26), (27), (28), (29), (30), (31), (32), (33), (43), (44), (45) refer toBuck

-He(25) refer to John Thornton

-they (35) refer to (35)Skeet and Nig

- they (53)refer to Hans and Pete (52)

- he (55) refer to Thornton(54)

-them(60) refer to Buck and John Thornton

*Cataphoric reference:

this man (8) refer to he(8),(9), (10), (11)

-Hans and Pete(52) refer to them(52)

*Personal reference: their dogs, his hands…

*Substitution

-They(2),they(3) - these dogs(1) )

-This (5) - Love, genuine passionate love(4)

- He (8), (9),(10),(11), (12) - John Thornton

-him(12)- Buck

-he(8)refer to This man(8)

-They(9) refer to dogs (9)

-it(11) refer to “gas” (11)

-He (8), (9),(10),(11), (12) refer to John Thornton

-he(14) refer to Buck (13)

-he (16)refer to Buck (15)

-they (23) refer to Buck and John Thornton

-he(21), (22), (26), (27), (28), (29), (30), (31), (32), (33), (43), (44), (45) refer toBuck

-He(25) refer to John Thornton

-they (35) refer to (35)Skeet and Nig

- they (53)refer to Hans and Pete (52)

- he (55) refer to Thornton(54)