1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo hóa học: " Research Article Iteration Scheme with Perturbed Mapping for Common Fixed Points of a Finite Family of Nonexpansive Mappings" ppt

10 248 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 506,7 KB

Nội dung

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Fixed Point Theory and Applications Volume 2007, Article ID 29091, 10 pages doi:10.1155/2007/29091 Research Article Iteration Scheme with Perturbed Mapping for Common Fixed Points of a Finite Family of Nonexpansive Mappings Yeong-Cheng Liou, Yonghong Yao, and Rudong Chen Received 17 December 2006; Revised 6 February 2007; Accepted 6 February 2007 Recommended by H ´ el ` ene Frankowska We propose a n iteration scheme with perturbed mapping for a pproximation of common fixed points of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings {T i } N i =1 . We show that the pro- posed iteration scheme converges to the common fixed point x ∗ ∈  N i =1 Fix(T i ) which solves some variational inequality. Copyright © 2007 Yeong-Cheng Liou et al. This is an open access article distributed un- der the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distri- bution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. Introduction and preliminaries Let H be a real Hilbert space with inner product ·,· and norm ·, respectively. A mapping T with domain D(T) and range R(T)inH is called nonexpansive if Tx− Ty≤x − y, ∀x, y ∈ D(T). (1.1) Let {T i } N i =1 be a finite family of nonexpansive self-maps of H. Denote the common fi xed points set of {T i } N i =1 by  N i =1 Fix(T i ). Let F : H → H be a mapping such that for some constants k,η>0, F is k-Lipschitzian and η-strongly monotone. Let {α n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ (0,1), {λ n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ [0,1) and take a fixed number μ ∈ (0,2η/k 2 ). The iterative schemes concern- ing nonlinear operators have been studied extensively by many authors, you may refer to [1–12]. Especially, in [13], Zeng and Yao introduced the following implicit iteration process with perturbed mapping F. For an arbitrary initial point x 0 ∈ H, the sequence {x n } ∞ n=1 is generated a s follows: x n = α n x n−1 +  1 − α n  T n x n − λ n μF  T n x n  , n ≥ 1, (1.2) where T n := T nmodN . 2 Fixed Point Theory and Applications Using this iteration process, they proved the following weak and strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Theorem 1.1 (see [13]). Let H be a real Hilber t space and let F : H → H be a mapping such that for some constants k,η>0, F is k-Lipschitzain vcommentand η-strongly mono- tone. Let {T i } N i =1 be N nonexpansive self-mappings of H such that  N i =1 Fix(T i ) =∅.Let μ ∈ (0,2η/k 2 ) and x 0 ∈ H.Let{λ n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ [0,1) and {α n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ (0,1) satisfying the condi- tions  ∞ n=1 λ n < ∞ and α ≤ α n ≤ β, n ≥ 1,forsomeα,β ∈ (0,1). Then the sequence {x n } ∞ n=1 defined by (1.2) converges weakly to a common fixed point of the mappings {T i } N i =1 . Theorem 1.2 (see [13]). Let H be a real Hilbert space and let F : H → H be a mapping such that for some constants k,η>0, F is k-Lipschitzain and η-strongly monotone. Let {T i } N i =1 be N nonexpansive self-mappings of H such that  N i =1 Fix(T i ) =∅.Letμ ∈ (0,2η/k 2 ) and x 0 ∈ H.Let{λ n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ [0,1) and {α n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ (0,1) satis fying the conditions  ∞ n=1 λ n < ∞ and α ≤ α n ≤ β, n ≥ 1,forsomeα,β ∈ (0,1). Then the sequence {x n } ∞ n=1 defined by (1.2) converges strongly to a common fixed point of the mappings {T i } N i =1 if and only if liminf n→∞ d  x n , N  i=1 Fix  T i   = 0. (1.3) Very recently, Wang [14] considered an explicit iterative scheme with perturbed map- ping F and obtained the following result. Theorem 1.3. Let H be a Hilbert space, let T : H → H be a nonexpansive mapping with F(T) =∅, and let F : H → H be an η-strongly monotone and k-Lipschitzian mapping. For any given x 0 ∈ H, {x n } is defined by x n+1 = α n x n +  1 − α n  T λ n+1 x n , n ≥ 0, (1.4) where T λ n+1 x n = Tx n − λ n+1 μF(Tx n ), {α n } and {λ n }⊂[0,1) satisfy the following condi- tions: (1) α ≤ α n ≤ β for some α,β ∈ (0,1); (2)  ∞ n=1 λ n < ∞; (3) 0 <μ<2η/k 2 . Then (1) {x n } converges weakly to a fixed point of T, (2) {x n } convergesstronglytoafixedpointofT if and only if liminf n→∞ d  x n ,F(T)  = 0. (1.5) This natural ly brings us the following questions. Questions 1.4. Let T i : H → H (i = 1,2, ,N) be a finite family of nonexpansive mappings and F is k-Lipschitzain and η-strongly monotone. (i) Could we construct an explicit iterative algorithm to approximate the common fixed points of the mappings {T i } N i =1 ? (ii) Could we remove the assumption (2) imposed on the sequence {x n }? Yeon g-Che ng L io u et a l. 3 Motivated and inspired by the above research work of Zeng and Yao [13] and Wang [14], in this paper, we will propose a new explicit iteration scheme with perturbed map- ping for approximation of common fixed points of a finite family of nonexpansive self- mappings of H. We will establish strong convergence theorem for this explicit iteration scheme. To be more specific, let α n1 ,α n2 , , α nN ∈ (0,1], n ∈ N. Given the mappings T 1 ,T 2 , , T N , following [15], one can define, for each n,mappingsU n1 ,U n2 , , U nN by U n1 = α n1 T 1 +  1 − α n1  I, U n2 = α n2 T 2 U n1 +  1 − α n2  I, . . . U n,N−1 = α n,N−1 T N−1 U n,N−2 +  1 − α n,N−1  I, W n := U nN = α nN T N U n,N−1 +  1 − α nN  I. (1.6) Such a mapping W n is called the W-mapping generated by T 1 , , T N and α n1 , , α nN . First we introduce the following explicit iteration scheme with perturbed mapping F. For an arbitrary initial point x 0 ∈ H, the sequence {x n } ∞ n=1 is generated iteratively by x n+1 = βx n +(1− β)  W n x n − λ n μF  W n x n  , n ≥ 0, (1.7) where {λ n } is a sequence in (0,1), β is a constant in (0,1), F is k-Lipschitzian and η- strongly monotone, and W n is the W-mapping defined by (1.6). We have the following crucial conclusion concerning W n . Proposition 1.5 (see [15]). Let C be a nonempt y closed convex subset of a Banach space E.LetT 1 ,T 2 , , T N be nonexpansive mappings of C into itself such that  N i =1 Fix(T i ) is nonempty, and let α n1 ,α n2 , , α nN be real numbers such that 0 <α ni ≤ b<1 for any i ∈ N. For any n ∈ N,letW n be the W-mapping of C into itself generated by T N ,T N−1 , , T 1 and α nN ,α n,N−1 , , α n1 . Then W n is nonexpansive. Further, if E is strictly convex, then Fix(W n ) =  N i =1 Fix(T i ). Now we recall some basic notations. Let T : H → H be nonexpansive mapping and F : H → H be a mapping such that for some constants k,η>0, F is k-Lipschitzian and η-strongly monotone; that is, F satisfies the following conditions: Fx− Fy≤kx − y, ∀x, y ∈ H, Fx− Fy,x − y≥ηx − y 2 , ∀x, y ∈ H, (1.8) respectively. We may assume, without loss of generality, that η ∈ (0,1) and k ∈ [1,∞). Under these conditions, it is well know n that the variational inequality problem—find x ∗ ∈  N i =1 Fix(T i )suchthat VI  F, N  i=1 Fix  T i   :  F  x ∗  ,x − x ∗  ≥ 0, ∀x ∈ N  i=1 Fix  T i  , (1.9) 4 Fixed Point Theory and Applications has a unique solution x ∗ ∈  N i =1 Fix(T i ). [Note: the unique existence of the solution x ∗ ∈  N i =1 Fix(T i ) is guaranteed automatically because F is k-Lipschitzian and η-strongly monotone over  N i =1 Fix(T i ).] For any given numbers λ ∈ [0,1) and μ ∈ (0,2η/k 2 ), we define the mapping T λ : H → H by T λ x := Tx− λμF(Tx), ∀x ∈ H. (1.10) Concerning the corresponding result of T λ x, you can find it in [16]. Lemma 1.6 (see [16]). If 0 ≤ λ<1 and 0 <μ<2η/k 2 , then there holds for T λ : H → H,   T λ x − T λ y   ≤ (1 − λτ)x − y, ∀x, y ∈ H, (1.11) where τ = 1 −  1 − μ(2η − μk 2 ) ∈ (0,1). Next, let us state four preliminary results which will be needed in the sequel. Lemma 1.7 is very interesting and important, you may find it in [17], the original prove can be found in [18]. Lemmas 1.8 and 1.9 well-known demiclosedness principle and subdiffer- ential inequality, respectively. Lemma 1.10 is basic and important result, please consult it in [19]. Lemma 1.7 (see [17]). Le t {x n } and {y n } be bounded sequences in a Banach space X and let {β n } beasequencein[0,1] with 0 < liminf n→∞ β n ≤ limsup n→∞ β n < 1. (1.12) Suppose x n+1 =  1 − β n  y n + β n x n , (1.13) for all integers n ≥ 0 and limsup n→∞    y n+1 − y n   −   x n+1 − x n    ≤ 0. (1.14) Then, lim n→∞ y n − x n =0. Lemma 1.8 (see [20]). Assume that T is a nonexpansive self-mapping of a closed convex subset C of a Hilbert space H.IfT has a fixed point, the n I − T is demiclosed. That is, when- ever {x n } isasequenceinC weakly converging to some x ∈ C and the sequence {(I − T)x n } strongly converges to some y, it follows that (I − T)x = y.Here,I is the identity operator of H. Lemma 1.9 (see [21]). x + y 2 ≤x 2 +2y,x + y for all x, y ∈ H. Lemma 1.10 (see [19]). Assume that {a n } is a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that a n+1 ≤  1 − γ n  a n + δ n , (1.15) Yeon g-Che ng L io u et a l. 5 where {γ n } isasequencein(0,1) and {δ n } isasequencesuchthat (1)  ∞ n=1 γ n =∞, (2) limsup n→∞ δ n /γ n ≤ 0 or  ∞ n=1 |δ n | < ∞. Then lim n→∞ a n = 0. 2. Main result Now we state and prove our main result. Theorem 2.1. Let H be a real Hilbert space and let F : H → H be a k-Lipschitzian and η-strongly monotone mapping. Let {T i } N i =1 be a finite family of nonexpansive self-mappings of H such that  N i =1 Fix(T i ) =∅.Letμ ∈ (0,2η/k 2 ). Suppose the sequences {α n,i } N i =1 sat- isfy lim n→∞ (α n,i − α n−1,i ) = 0,foralli = 1,2, ,N.If{λ n } ∞ n=1 ⊂ [0,1) satisfy the following conditions: (i) lim n→∞ λ n = 0; (ii)  ∞ n=0 λ n =∞, then the sequence {x n } ∞ n=1 defined by (1.7) converges strongly to a common fixed point x ∗ ∈  N i =1 Fix(T i ) which solves the variational inequality (1.9). Proof. Let x ∗ be an arbitrary element of  N i =1 Fix(T i ). Observe that   x n+1 − x ∗   =   βx n +(1− β)W λ n n x n − x ∗   ≤ β   x n − x ∗   +(1− β)   W λ n n x n − x ∗   , (2.1) where W λ n n x := W n x − λ n μF(W n x). Note that W λ n n x ∗ = x ∗ − λ n μF  x ∗  . (2.2) Utilizing Lemma 1.6,wehave   W λ n n x n − x ∗   =   W λ n n x n − W λ n n x ∗ + W λ n n x ∗ − x ∗   ≤   W λ n n x n − W λ n n x ∗   +   W λ n n x ∗ − x ∗   ≤  1 − λ n τ    x n − x ∗   + λ n μ   F  x ∗    . (2.3) From (2.1)and(2.3), we have   x n+1 − x ∗   ≤  β +(1− β)  1 − λ n τ    x n − x ∗   +(1− β)λ n μ   F  x ∗    =  1 − (1 − β)λ n τ    x n − x ∗   +(1− β)λ n μ   F  x ∗    ≤ max    x 0 − x ∗   ,  μ τ    F  x ∗     . (2.4) Hence, {x n } is bounded. We also can obtain that {W n x n }, {T i U n, j x n }(i = 1, ,N; j = 1, , N), and {F(W n x n )} are all bounded. We w ill use M to denote the possible different constants appearing in the following reasoning. 6 Fixed Point Theory and Applications We note that   W λ n+1 n+1 x n+1 − W λ n n x n   =   W n+1 x n+1 − W n x n − λ n+1 μF  W n+1 x n+1  + λ n μF  W n x n    ≤   W n+1 x n+1 − W n x n   + λ n+1 μ   F  W n+1 x n+1    + λ n μ   F  W n x n    ≤   W n+1 x n+1 − W n+1 x n   +   W n+1 x n − W n x n   +  λ n+1 + λ n  M ≤   x n+1 − x n   +   W n+1 x n − W n x n   +  λ n+1 + λ n  M. (2.5) From (1.6), since T N and U n,N are nonexpansive,   W n+1 x n − W n x n   =   α n+1,N T N U n+1,N−1 x n +  1 − α n+1,N  x n − α n,N T N U n,N−1 x n −  1 − α n,N  x n   ≤   α n+1,N T N U n+1,N−1 x n − α n,N T N U n,N−1 x n   +   α n+1,N − α n,N     x n   ≤   α n+1,N  T N U n+1,N−1 x n − T N U n,N−1 x n    +   α n+1,N − α n,N     T N U n,N−1 x n   +   α n+1,N − α n,N     x n   ≤ α n+1,N   U n+1,N−1 x n − U n,N−1 x n   +2M   α n+1,N − α n,N   . (2.6) Again, from (1.6), we have   U n+1,N−1 x n − U n,N−1 x n   =   α n+1,N−1 T N−1 U n+1,N−2 x n +  1 − α n+1,N−1  x n − α n,N−1 T N−1 U n,N−2 x n −  1 − α n,N−1  x n   ≤   α n+1,N−1 T N−1 U n+1,N−2 x n − α n,N−1 T N−1 U n,N−2 x n   +   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1     x n   ≤   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1     x n   +   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1   M + α n+1,N−1   T N−1 U n+1,N−2 x n − T N−1 U n,N−2 x n   ≤ 2M   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1   + α n+1,N−1   U n+1,N−2 x n − U n,N−2 x n   ≤ 2M   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1   +   U n+1,N−2 x n − U n,N−2 x n   . (2.7) Yeon g-Che ng L io u et a l. 7 Therefore, we have   U n+1,N−1 x n − U n,N−1 x n   ≤ 2M   α n+1,N−1 − α n,N−1   +2M   α n+1,N−2 − α n,N−2   +   U n+1,N−3 x n − U n,N−3 x n   ≤ 2M N−1  i=2   α n+1,i − α n,i   +   U n+1,1 x n − U n,1 x n   =   α n+1,1 T 1 x n +  1 − α n+1,1  x n − α n,1 T 1 x n −  1 − α n,1  x n   +2M N−1  i=2   α n+1,i − α n,i   , (2.8) then   U n+1,N−1 x n − U n,N−1 x n   ≤   α n+1,1 − α n,1     x n   +   α n+1,1 T 1 x n − α n,1 T 1 x n   +2M N−1  i=2   α n+1,i − α n,i   ≤ 2M N−1  i=1   α n+1,i − α n,i   . (2.9) Substituting (2.9)into(2.6), we have   W n+1 x n − W n x n   ≤ 2M   α n+1,N − α n,N   +2α n+1,N M N−1  i=1   α n+1,i − α n,i   ≤ 2M N  i=1   α n+1,i − α n,i   . (2.10) Substituting (2.10)into(2.5), we have   W λ n+1 n+1 x n+1 − W λ n n x n   ≤   x n+1 − x n   +2M N  i=1   α n+1,i − α n,i   +  λ n+1 + λ n  M, (2.11) which implies that limsup n→∞    W λ n+1 n+1 x n+1 − W λ n n x n   −   x n+1 − x n    ≤ 0. (2.12) We note that x n+1 = βx n +(1− β)W λ n n x n and 0 <β<1, then from Lemma 1.7 and (2.12), we hav e lim n→∞ W λ n n x n − x n =0. It follows that lim n→∞   x n+1 − x n   = lim n→∞ (1 − β)   W λ n n x n − x n   = 0. (2.13) On the other hand,   x n − W n x n   ≤   x n+1 − x n   +   x n+1 − W n x n   ≤   x n+1 − x n   + β   x n − W n x n   +(1− β)λ n μ   F  W n x n    , (2.14) 8 Fixed Point Theory and Applications that is,   x n − W n x n   ≤ 1 1 − β   x n+1 − x n   + λ n μ   F  W n x n    , (2.15) this together with (i) and (2.13)imply lim n→∞   x n − W n x n   = 0. (2.16) We next show that limsup n→∞  − F  x ∗  ,x n − x ∗  ≤ 0. (2.17) To prove this, we pick a subsequence {x n i } of {x n } such that limsup n→∞  − F  x ∗  ,x n − x ∗  = lim i→∞  − F  x ∗  ,x n i − x ∗  . (2.18) Without loss of generality, we may further assume that x n i → z weakly for some z ∈ H. By Lemma 1.8 and (2.16), we have z ∈ Fix  W n  , (2.19) this together with Proposition 1.5 imply that z ∈ N  i=1 Fix  T i  . (2.20) Since x ∗ solves the v ariational inequality (1.9), then we obtain limsup n→∞  − F  x ∗  ,x n − x ∗  =  − F  x ∗  ,z − x ∗  ≤ 0. (2.21) Finally, we show that x n → x ∗ . Indeed, from Lemma 1.9,wehave   x n+1 − x ∗   2 =   β  x n − x ∗  +(1− β)  W λ n n x n − W λ n n x ∗  +(1− β)  W λ n n x ∗ − x ∗    2 ≤   β  x n − x ∗  +(1− β)  W λ n n x n − W λ n n x ∗    2 +2(1− β)  W λ n n x ∗ − x ∗ ,x n+1 − x ∗  ≤  β   x n − x ∗   +(1− β)   W λ n n x n − W λ n n x ∗    2 +2(1− β)λ n μ  − F  x ∗  ,x n+1 − x ∗  ≤  β   x n − x ∗   +(1− β)  1 − λ n τ    x n − x ∗    2 +2(1− β)λ n μ  − F  x ∗  ,x n+1 − x ∗  ≤  1 − (1 − β)τλ n    x n − x ∗   2 +(1− β)τλ n  2 μ τ  − F  x ∗  ,x n+1 − x ∗   . (2.22) Now applying Lemma 1.10 and (2.21)to(2.22) concludes that x n → x ∗ (n →∞). This completes the proof.  Yeon g-Che ng L io u et a l. 9 Acknowledgments The authors thank the referees for their suggestions and comments which led to the present version. The research was partially supposed by Grant NSC 95-2221-E-230-017. References [1] L C. Zeng and J C. Yao, “Stability of iterative procedures with errors for approximating com- mon fixed points of a couple of q-contractive-like mappings in Banach spaces,” Journal of Math- ematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 661–674, 2006. [2] Y C. Lin, N C. Wong, and J C. Yao, “Strong convergence theorems of Ishikawa iteration pro- cess with errors for fixed points of Lipschitz continuous mappings in Banach spaces,” Tai wa ne se Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 543–552, 2006. [3] L C. Zeng, N C. Wong, and J C. Yao, “Strong convergence theorems for strictly pseudocon- tractive mappings of Browder-Petryshyn type,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 837–849, 2006. [4] Y C. Lin, “Three-step iterative convergence theorems with er rors in Banach spaces,” Ta iwa ne se Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2006. [5] L C. Zeng, G. M. Lee, and N C. Wong, “Ishikawa iteration with errors for approximating fixed points of strictly pseudocontractive mappings of Browder-Petryshyn type,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 2006. [6] S. Schaible, J C. Yao, and L C. Zeng, “A proximal method for pseudomonotone type variational-like inequalities,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 497–513, 2006. [7] L C. Zeng, L. J. Lin, and J C. Yao, “Auxiliary problem method for mixed variational-like in- equalities,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 515–529, 2006. [8] L C. Zeng, N C. Wong, and J C. Yao, “On the convergence analysis of modified hybrid steepest-descent methods with variable par ameters for variational inequalities,” to appear in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. [9] L. C. Ceng, P. Cubiotti, and J C. Yao, “Approximation of common fixed points of families of nonexpansive mappings,” to appear in Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics. [10] L. C. Ceng, P. Cubiotti, and J C. Yao, “Strong convergence theorems for finitely many nonex- pansive mappings and applications,” to appear in Nonlinear Analysis. [11] L C. Zeng, S. Y. Wu, and J C. Yao, “Generalized KKM theorem with applications to generalized minimax inequalities and generalized equilibrium problems,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1497–1514, 2006. [12] L. C. Ceng, C. Lee, and J C. Yao, “Strong weak convergence theorems of implicit hybrid steepest-descent methods for var iational inequalities,” to appear in Taiwanese Journal of Mathe- matics. [13] L C. Zeng and J C. Yao, “Implicit iteration scheme with perturbed mapping for common fixed points of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2507–2515, 2006. [14] L. Wang, “An iteration method for nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces,” Fixed Point The- ory and Applications, vol. 2007, Article ID 28619, 8 pages, 2007. [15] W. Takahashi and K. Shimoji, “Convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and feasibil- ity problems,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 32, no. 11–13, pp. 1463–1471, 2000. [16] H. K. Xu and T. H. Kim, “Convergence of hybrid steepest-descent methods for variational in- equalities,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 185–201, 2003. 10 Fixed Point Theory and Applications [17] T. Suzuki, “Strong convergence of Krasnoselskii and Mann’s type sequences for one-parameter nonexpansive semigroups without Bochner integrals,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Ap- plications, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. 227–239, 2005. [18] T. Suzuki, “Strong convergence theorems for infinite families of nonexpansive mappings in gen- eral Banach spaces,” Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2005, no. 1, pp. 103–123, 2005. [19] H K. Xu, “Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings,” Journal of Mathe- matical Analysis and Applications, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 279–291, 2004. [20] K. Geobel and W. A. Kirk, Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, vol. 28 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990. [21] G. Marino and H K. Xu, “Convergence of generalized proximal point algorithms,” Communi- cations on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 791–808, 2004. Yeong-Cheng Liou: Department of Information Management, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan Email address: simplex liou@hotmail.com Yonghong Yao: Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianji 300160, China Email address: yuyanrong@tjpu.edu.cn Rudong Chen: Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianji 300160, China Email address: chenrd@tjpu.edu.cn . H ´ el ` ene Frankowska We propose a n iteration scheme with perturbed mapping for a pproximation of common fixed points of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings {T i } N i =1 . We show that the pro- posed. perturbed mapping for common fixed points of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2507–2515, 2006. [14] L. Wang, “An iteration method for nonexpansive mappings. Cubiotti, and J C. Yao, “Approximation of common fixed points of families of nonexpansive mappings,” to appear in Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics. [10] L. C. Ceng, P. Cubiotti, and J C. Yao, “Strong

Ngày đăng: 22/06/2014, 22:20

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN