Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 22 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
22
Dung lượng
564,39 KB
Nội dung
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2009, Article ID 161405, 22 pages doi:10.1155/2009/161405 ResearchArticleAKindofEstimateofDifferenceNormsinAnisotropicWeightedSobolev-Lorentz Spaces Jiecheng Chen 1 and Hongliang Li 1, 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China 2 Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Education Institute, Hangzhou 310012, China Correspondence should be addressed to Hongliang Li, honglli@126.com Received 27 April 2009; Accepted 2 July 2009 Recommended by Shusen Ding We investigate the functions spaces on R n for which the g eneralized partial derivatives D r k k f exist andbelongtodifferent Lorentz spaces Λ p k ,s k w,wherep k > 1andw is nonincreasing and satisfies some special conditions. For the functions in these weightedSobolev-Lorentz spaces, the estimates of the Besov type norms are found. The methods used in the paper are based on some estimates of nonincreasing rearrangements and the application of B p , B p,∞ weights. Copyright q 2009 J. Chen and H. Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. Introduction In this paper we study functions f on R n which possess the generalized partial derivatives D r k k f ≡ ∂ r k f ∂x r k k r k ∈ N . 1.1 Our main goal is to obtain some norm estimates for the differences Δ r k k h f x ≡ r k j0 −1 r k −j r k j f x jhe k h ∈ R 1.2 e k being the unit coordinate vector. 2 Journal of Inequalities and Applications The classic Sobolev embedding theorem asserts that for any function f in Sobolev space W 1 p R n 1 ≤ p<n f q ∗ ≤ C n k1 ∂f ∂x k p ,q ∗ np n − p . 1.3 Sobolev proved this inequality in 1938 for p>1. His method, based on integral representations, did not work in the case p 1. Only at the end of fifties Gagliardo and Nirenberg gave simple proofs of inequality 1.3 for all 1 ≤ p<n.Inequality 1.3 has been generalized in various directions see 1–6 for details. It was proved that the left hand side in 1.3 can be replaced by the stronger Lorentz norm, that is, there holds the inequality f q ∗ ,p ≤ C n k1 ∂f ∂x k p , 1 ≤ p<n. 1.4 For p>1 the result follows by interpolation see 7, 8. In the case p 1 some geometric inequalities were applied to prove 1.4see 9–13. The sharp estimates of the normsof differences for the functions in Sobolev spaces have firstly been proved by Besov et al. 1, Volume 2, page 72. For the space W 1 p R n 1 ≤ p< n Il’in’s result reads as follows: If n ∈ N, 1 <p<q<∞ and α ≡ 1 − n1/p − 1/q > 0, then n k1 ∞ 0 h −α Δ 1 k h f q p dh h 1/p ≤ C n k1 ∂f ∂x k p . 1.5 Actually, this means that there holds the continuous embedding to the Besov space W 1 p R n → B α p,q R n . 1.6 It is easy to see that inequality 1.5 fails to hold for p n 1, but, it was proved in 14 that 1.5 is true for p 1andn ≥ 2. The generalization of the inequality 1.5 to the spaces W r 1 , ,r n p was given in 12.That is n k1 ∞ 0 h −α k Δ r k k h f q,p p dh h 1/p ≤ C n k1 D r k k f p , 1.7 where 0 < 1/p − 1/q < r/n, r n n i1 r −1 i −1 , and α k r k 1 − r/n1/p − 1/q;the inequality is valid if p>1,n≥ 1orp 1,n≥ 2. Using 1.7, we get the following continuous embedding: W r 1 , ,r n p R n → B α 1 , ,α n q,p R n . 1.8 For p>1 this embedding was proved by Besov et al. 1, Volume 2, page 72. The main result in 12 is the proof of 1.7 for p 1,n≥ 2. Journal of Inequalities and Applications 3 In 15, there was the sharp estimates of the type 1.7 when the derivatives D r k k f belong to different Lorentz spaces L p k ,s k . Before stating the theorem, we give some notations. Let S 0 R n be the class of all measurable and almost everywhere finite functions f on R n such that for each y>0, λ f y x ∈ R n : f x >y < ∞. 1.9 Let r k ∈ N and 1 ≤ p k ,s k < ∞ for k 1, ,nn ≥ 2. Denote r n n k1 1 r k −1 ,p n r n k1 1 p k r k −1 , s n r n k1 1 s k r k −1 . 1.10 Now we state the main theorem in 15. Theorem 1.1. Let n ≥ 2,r k ∈ N, 1 ≤ p k ,s k < ∞, and s k 1 if p k 1.Letr, p, and s be the numbers defined by 1.10. For every p j 1 ≤ j ≤ n satisfying the condition ρ j ≡ r n 1 p j − 1 p > 0, 1.11 take arbitrary q j >p j such that 1 q j > 1 p − r n , 1.12 and denote H j 1 − 1 ρ j 1 p j − 1 q j ,α j H j r j , 1 θ j 1 − H j s H j s j , 1.13 then for any function f ∈ S 0 R n which has the weak derivatives D r k k f ∈ L p k ,s k R n k 1, ,n there holds the inequality ∞ 0 h −α j Δ r j j h f q j ,1 θ dh h 1/θ j ≤ C n k1 D r k k f p k ,s k , 1.14 where C is a constant that does not depend on f. In many cases, the Lorentz space should be substituted by more general space, the weighted Lorentz space. In this paper, we will generalize the above result when the weighted Lorentz spaces Λ p k ,s k w take place of L p k ,s k , where w is a weight on R which satisfies some special conditions. 4 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2. Auxiliary Proposition Let MX, μ be the class of all measurable and almost everywhere finite functions on X. For f ∈MX, μ, a nonincreasing rearrangement of f is a nonincreasing function f ∗ on R ≡ 0, ∞, that is, equimeasurable with |f|. The rearrangement f ∗ can be defined by the equality f ∗ t inf λ : μ f λ ≤ t , 0 <t<∞, 2.1 where μ f λ μ x ∈ X : f x >λ ,λ≥ 0. 2.2 If X R n ,μE|E|, then the following relation holds 16, Chapter 2: sup |E|t E f x dx t 0 f ∗ u du. 2.3 Set f ∗∗ t 1 t t 0 f ∗ s ds. 2.4 Assume that 0 <q,p<∞. A function f ∈MX, μ belongs to the Lorentz space L q,p X if f q,p ∞ 0 t 1/q f ∗ t p dt t 1/p < ∞. 2.5 For 0 <p<∞, the space L p,∞ X is defined as the class of all f ∈MX, μ such that f p,∞ sup t>0 t 1/p f ∗ t < ∞. 2.6 We also let L ∞,∞ XL ∞ X.Letw be a weight in R nonnegative locally integrable functions in R . If X, μR ,wtdt, we replace L q,p X with L q,p w. For 0 <p,q<∞,or0<p≤∞ and q ∞, the weighted Lorentz space Λ p,q R n wΛ p,q w is defined in 9, Chapter 2 by Λ p,q w f ∈M R n : f Λ p,q w f ∗ L p,q w < ∞ . 2.7 If p q, denote Λ p wΛ p,p w. It is well known that Λ p,q 1 L p,q R n , 2.8 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 5 and if 0 <p,q<∞, then Λ p,q w Λ q w , 2.9 where w t W q/p−1 t w t ,W t t 0 w s ds. 2.10 In following part of this paper, we will always denote Wt t 0 wsds. The weighted Lorentz spaces have close connection with weights of B p ,B p,∞ for 0 < p<∞ see 9, C hapter 1.LetA be the Hardy operator as follows: Af t 1 t t 0 f s ds, t > 0. 2.11 The space L p dec is the cone of all nonnegative nonincreasing functions in L p . We denote w ∈ B p if A : L p dec w −→ L p w 2.12 is bounded and denote w ∈ B p,∞ if A : L p dec w −→ L p,∞ w 2.13 is bounded. Lemma 2.1 Generalized Hardy’s inequalities. Let ψ be nonnegative, measurable on 0, ∞ and suppose −∞ <λ<1, 1 ≤ q ≤∞, and w is a weight in R , W∞∞, then one has ∞ 0 Wt λ 1 Wt t 0 ψswsds q wt Wt dt 1/q ≤ 1 1 − λ ∞ 0 Wt λ ψt q wt Wt dt 1/q , ∞ 0 Wt 1−λ ∞ t ψs ws Ws ds q wt Wt dt 1/q ≤ 1 1 − λ ∞ 0 Wt 1−λ ψt q wt Wt dt 1/q 2.14 (with the obvious modification if q ∞). Proof. It is easy to obtain this result applying Hardy’s inequality 16. Lemma 2.2. Let ψ ∈ Λ p,s w1 ≤ p, s < ∞ be a nonnegative nonincreasing function on R , w be a nonincreasing weight on R and there exists A>0, such that W ξt ≥ ξ A W t , ∀ξ>1, ∀t>0, 2.15 6 Journal of Inequalities and Applications Then for δ>0 there exists a continuously differentiable φ on R such that i ψt ≤ Cφt,t∈ R , ii φtWt 1/p−δ decreases and φtWt 1/pδ increases on R , iii φ Λ p,s w ≤ Cψ Λ p,s w , where C is a constant depends only on p, δ, and A. Proof. Without loss of generality, we may suppose that δ<1/p.Set φ 1 t Wt δ−1/p ∞ t/2 ψ u Wu 1/p−δ w u W u du. 2.16 Then φ 1 tWt 1/p−δ decreases and φ 1 t ≥ Wt δ−1/p t t/2 ψ u Wu 1/p−δ w u W u du ≥ Wt δ−1/p ψ t Wt 1/p−δ − Wt/2 1/p−δ 1/p − δ . 2.17 Using the conditions which w satisfy, it gives φ 1 t ≥ Cψ t . 2.18 Furthermore, noticing w is nonincreasing and applying Lemma 2.1,wegetthat φ 1 Λ p,s w 2 ∞ 0 W2h δ ∞ h Wu 1/p−δ ψu wu Wu du s w2h W2h dh 1/s ≤ 2 1/sδ ∞ 0 Wh δ ∞ h Wu 1/p−δ ψu wu Wu du s wh Wh dh 1/s ≤ C ∞ 0 Wh 1/p ψh s wh Wh dh 1/s Cψ Λ p,s w . 2.19 now set φ t δ 1 p Wt −1/p−δ t 0 φ 1 u Wu δ1/p w u W u du. 2.20 Then φtWt 1/pδ increases on R ,and φ t ≥ φ 1 t ≥ Cψ t . 2.21 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 7 Furthermore, φ t Wt 1/p−δ δ 1 p Wt −2δ t 0 φ 1 u Wu δ1/p w u W u du Wt −2δ t 0 φ 1 u dWu δ1/p Wt −2δ Wt 2δ 0 φ 1 h v v 1/p−δ/2δ dv, 2.22 where v Wu 2δ ,hvu, that is, hvW −1 v 1/2δ . Since φ 1 tWt 1/p−δ is decreasing function on R ,thusφ 1 hvv 1/p−δ/2δ is decreasing and φtWt 1/p−δ is also decreasing on R . Finally, using Lemma 2.1 and 2.19,wegetiii.TheLemma 2.2 is proved. Let r k ∈ N and 1 <p k < ∞ for k 1, ,nn ≥ 2. Denote r n ⎛ ⎝ n j1 1 r j ⎞ ⎠ −1 ,p n r ⎛ ⎝ n j1 1 p j r j ⎞ ⎠ −1 , γ k 1 − 1 r k r n 1 p k − 1 p . 2.23 Then γ k > 0and n k1 γ k n − 1. 2.24 To prove our main results we use the estimates of the rearrangement ofa given function in term of its derivatives D r k k f k 1, ,n. We will use the notations 2.23. Lemma 2.3. Let r k ∈ N, 1 <p k < ∞, 1 ≤ s k < ∞ for k 1, ,nn ≥ 2 and w is continuous weight on R .Set s n r ⎛ ⎝ n j1 1 s j r j ⎞ ⎠ −1 . 2.25 Let 0 <δ< 1 4 min γ j <1 1 − γ j , 2.26 8 Journal of Inequalities and Applications and suppose that φ k ∈ Λ p k ,s k wk 1, ,n are positive continuously differentiable functions with φ k t < 0 on R such that φ k tWt 1/p k −δ decreases and φ k tWt 1/p k δ increases on R .Setfor u, t > 0, η k u, t W t u r k φ k t , 2.27 σ t sup min 1≤k≤n η k u k ,t : n k1 u k W t n−1 ,u k > 0 . 2.28 Then i there holds the inequality ∞ 0 Wt s1/p−r/n−1 σt s wtdt 1/s ≤ C n k1 φ k r/nr k Λ p k ,s k w ; 2.29 ii there exist continuously differentiable functions u k t on R such that n k1 u k t W t n−1 , σ t η k u k t ,t t ∈ R ,k 1, ,n ; 2.30 iii for any k such that 1 p k > 1 p − r n 2.31 the function u k tWt δ−1 decreases on R . Proof. The proof is similar to 15, Lemma 2.2. All the argument holds true when we substitute the weight wt in this lemma for wt1. The Lebesgue measure ofa measurable set A ⊂ R k will be denoted by mes k A. For any F σ −set E ⊂ R n denote by E j the orthogonal projection of E onto the coordinate hyperplane x j 0. By the Loomis-Whitney inequality 17, Chapter 4 mes n E n−1 ≤ n j1 mes n−1 E j . 2.32 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 9 Let f ∈ S 0 R n ,t>0, and let E t be a set of type F σ and measure t such that |fx|≥ f ∗ t for all x ∈ E t . Denote by λ j t the n − 1-dimensional measure of the projection E j t j 1, ,n. By 2.32, we have that n j1 λ j t ≥ t n−1 . 2.33 Lemma 2.4. Let n ≥ 2,r k ∈ N k 1, ,n,wbe nonincreasing, and wt → a when t →∞ where a>0. Function f ∈ S 0 R n has weak derivatives D r k k f ∈ L loc R n k 1, ,n. Then for all 0 <t<τ<∞ and k 1, ,none has f ∗ t ≤ K f ∗ τ τ t r k Wt λ k t r k D r k k f ∗∗ τ , 2.34 where n k1 λ k t ≥ Wt n−1 and K is a constant depending on r 1 , ,r n and a. Proof. Let λ k t1/ n √ aWt/tλ k t, then n k1 λ k t 1 a Wt t n n k1 λ k t . 2.35 Due to the conditions of w and 2.33, we can get n k1 λ k t ≥ Wt n−1 . 2.36 In 2, 12, 15, we have f ∗ t ≤ K f ∗ τ τ λ k t r k D r k k f ∗∗ τ . 2.37 So we immediately get 2.34. Lemma 2.5. If w ∈ B 1,∞ , 1 <p 0 < ∞ and 1 ≤ s 0 < ∞,thenv ≡ Wt s 0 /p 0 −1 wt ∈ B s 0 . Proof. Let w ∈ B 1,∞ . Since B 1,∞ ⊂ B p 0 , so by 9, Chapter 1 we get r 0 1 Wt 1/p 0 dt ≤ C r Wr 1/p 0 , ∀r>0. 2.38 Then r 0 1 V t 1/s 0 dt ≤ C r V r 1/s 0 , ∀r>0, 2.39 10 Journal of Inequalities and Applications where V t t 0 v t dt. 2.40 So v ∈ B s 0 . Lemma 2.6. Let n ≥ 2,r k ∈ N, 1 <p k < ∞, 1 ≤ s k < ∞ for k 1, ,n.Assume that weight w on R satisfies the following conditions: i it is nonincreasing, continuous, and lim t →∞ wta, a > 0, ii exists A>0, such that W ξt ≥ ξ A W t , ∀ξ>1, ∀t>0. 2.41 Set r n n k1 1 r k −1 ,p n r n k1 1 p k r k −1 , s n r n k1 1 s k r k −1 . 2.42 Assume that a locally integrable function f ∈ S 0 R n has weak derivatives D r k k f ∈ Λ p k ,s k wk 1, ,n. Then for any ξ>1 f ∗ t ≤ K f ∗ ξt ξ r σ t , 2.43 where r max r k , the constants K depends only on r 1 , ,r n ,w, and ∞ 0 Wt s1/p−r/n−1 wtσt s dt 1/s ≤ C n k1 D r k k f r/nr k Λ p k ,s k w . 2.44 Proof. For every fixed k 1, ,nwe take ψ k t D r k k f ∗∗ t . 2.45 Thanks to Lemma 2.5,andw ∈ B 1,∞ for w is nonincreasing,weknow v Wt s k /p k −1 w t ∈ B s k . 2.46 Thus ψ k Λ p k ,s k w D r k k f ∗∗ L s k v ≤ C D r k k f ∗ L s k v C D r k k f Λ p k ,s k w . 2.47 [...]... Mart´n and M Milman, “Symmetrization inequalities and Sobolev embeddings,” Proceedings of the ı American Mathematical Society, vol 134, no 8, pp 2335–2347, 2006 19 J Mart´n and M Milman, “Higher-order symmetrization inequalities and applications,” Journal of ı Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 330, no 1, pp 91–113, 2007 20 V I Kolyada, “Inequalities of Gagliardo-Nirenberg type and estimates... Strichartz, “Multipliers on fractional Sobolev spaces,” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, vol 16, pp 1031–1060, 1967 9 M J Carro, J A Raposo, and J Soria, “Recent developments in the theory of Lorentz spaces and weighted inequalities,” Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol 187, no 877, 2007 22 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 10 W G Faris, “Weak Lebesgue spaces and quantum mechanical... of functions and embedding ofanisotropic spaces of Sobolev type,” East Journal on Approximations, vol 4, no 2, pp 111–199, 1998 3 L D Kudryavtsev and S M Nikol’ski˘, “Spaces of differentiable functions of several variables and ı imbedding theorems,” in Analysis, vol 26 of Encyclopaedia Math Sci., pp 1–140, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991 4 S M Nikol’ski´, Approximation of Functions of Several Variables... Kolyada and F J P´ rez, “Estimates of difference norms for functions inanisotropic Sobolev e spaces,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol 267, pp 46–64, 2004 16 C Bennett and R Sharpley, Interpolation of Operators, vol 129 of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1988 17 H Hadwiger, Vorlesungen uber Inhalt, Oberfl¨ che und Isoperimetrie, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1957 a ¨ 18 J Mart´n... Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province no Y606117 , Foundation of Zhejiang Province Education Department no Y200803879 and 2008 Excellent Youth Foundation of College of Zhejiang Province no 01132047 References 1 O V Besov, V P Il in, and S M Nikol’ski˘, Integral Representations of Functions and Imbedding Theorems ı Vol I, V H Winston & Sons, Washington, DC, USA, 1978 2 V I Kolyada, “Rearrangements... Variables and Imbedding Theorems, Springer, New ı York, NY, USA, 1975 5 H Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces, vol 78 of Monographs in Mathematics, Birkh¨ user, Basel, a Switzerland, 1983 6 H Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces II, vol 84 of Monographs in Mathematics, Birkh¨ user, Basel, a Switzerland, 1992 7 J Peetre, “Espaces d’interpolation et th´ or` me de Soboleff,” Universit´ de Grenoble Annales de l’Institut... mechanical binding,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol 43, no 2, pp 365–373, 1976 11 V I Kolyada, “Rearrangements of functions, and embedding theorems,” Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, vol 44, no 5, pp 61–95, 1989, English translation: Russian Math Surveys, vol 44, no 5, pp 73–118, 1989 12 V I Kolyada, “On the embedding of Sobolev spaces,” Matematicheskie Zametki, vol 54, no 3, pp 48– 71, 1993, English translation:... 2.58 Journal of Inequalities and Applications 13 This statement can be easily got from Lemma 2.6 Inequality 2.58 gives a generalization of Remark 2.6 of 15 when pk > 1, k 1, , n because w 1 satisfies the preceding conditions Remark 2.10 Beyond constant weights, there are many weights satisfying conditions of Corollary 2.7 For example, i w t−α a, where 0 < α < θ, 0 < a < ∞, ii ⎧ ⎨t−α , if 0 < t < 1,...Journal of Inequalities and Applications 11 Next we apply Lemma 2.2 with δ defined as in Lemma 2.3 In this way we obtain the 1, , n Further, with these functions φk t we functions which we denote by φk t k define the function σ t by 2.28 By Lemma 2.3, we have the inequality 2.44 Using Lemma 2.4 with τ ξt, we obtain f t ≤ K f ∗ ξt where n k 1 λk t ≥W t n−1 rk W t λk t ξr φk , 2.48 Taking into account... Journal of Inequalities and Applications Therefore, we get, applying 3.27 and 3.34 J 1/θ1 ≤ C ∞ W t s 1/p−r/n −1 w t σ t s dt 1−H1 /s 0 ≤C n r D11 f H1 Λp1 ,s1 w 3.46 1−H1 r Dkk f k 1 r/ nrk Λpk ,sk w r D11 f H1 Λp1 ,s1 w Since n k r nrk 1 1, 3.47 we get the inequality 3.6 The theorem is proved Let X X Rn be a rearrangement invariant space r.i space , Y be an r.i space over s s 1 s integral part of . Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2009, Article ID 161405, 22 pages doi:10.1155/2009/161405 Research Article A Kind of Estimate of Difference Norms. class of all measurable and almost everywhere finite functions on X. For f ∈MX, μ, a nonincreasing rearrangement of f is a nonincreasing function f ∗ on R ≡ 0, ∞, that is, equimeasurable. 2.53 12 Journal of Inequalities and Applications Proof. Let f g h,withg ∈ Λ 1 w and h ∈ Λ p 0 w. Applying H ¨ older’s inequality and noticing W∞∞ and w is nonincreasing, we obtain J 1 ≡ ∞ 1 f ∗θ t Wt θ/q−1 w t dt ≤ ∞ 1 g ∗θ t 2 W t θ/q−1 w t dt