Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 18 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
18
Dung lượng
2,47 MB
Nội dung
Composting Barrel for Sustainable Organic WasteManagement in Bangladesh 83 in the conventional barrel is higher than the desired moisture content due to lack of aeration in all stages of the composting operation than that of the modified barrel. The result of chemical analysis of compost sample is presented in Figure 6. Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 % nutrients (before modification) (after modification) Fig. 6. Quantity of different nutrients present in the compost sample 12345 0 5 10 15 20 25 C/N ratio Compost sample (before modification) (after modification) Fig. 7. Carbon- Nitrogen ratio of ready compost samples As the ultimate goal of the composting of organic solid waste is to use the compost as a soil conditioner and also as a fertilizer in the agricultural field, it is important to examine the values of different nutrients. All chemical analyses were performed according to the standard methods of soil and compost analysis (Goyal, 2005; Sundberg, 2004; Jackson, 1973). It is observed that the values of nutrients i.e. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium (NPK) were very much similar as reported in other countries (Asija et al., 1984). The NPK values WasteManagement 84 were lower than the ideal values (N=1.5%, P=1.2%, K=0.8%) when the conventional barrel was used because of the lack of aeration during the composting (Verma et al., 1999). Decomposition of organic matter is brought about by microorganisms that use the carbon as a source of energy and nitrogen for building cell structure. More carbon than nitrogen is needed. If the excess of carbon is too great, decomposition decreases when the nitrogen is used up and some of the organisms die (Nakasaki et al., 2005, Polprasert, 1996). The stored nitrogen is then used by other organisms to form new cell material. Figure 7 shows that the carbon-nitrogen (C/N) ratio of the ready compost varies from 11 to 14 in different samples in the study area after the modification. In the case of conventional barrel reactor the C/N ratio was found to be higher (above 24) than the recommended values (12-16). The compost from the conventional barrel would not be suitable for agricultural land application since the excess carbon would tend to utilize nitrogen in the soil to build cell protoplasm, consequently resulting in loss of nitrogen in the soil on which it would be applied. 4. Financial assessment of modified barrel composting project The generation of solid waste was found to increase almost linearly with increasing of per capita income. Figure 8 shows the variation of the waste generation rate with the variation of per capita (person) income of selected low and middle-income family in the study area. When the per capita income per month is US$6-8, per capita waste generation is about 0.27 kg/day and when per capita income per month is US$67-75, per capita waste generation is about 0.38 kg/day. Three different revenues were assessed from the modified composting barrel plant. These are • fees charged by the collection scheme to the service beneficiaries (households) on a monthly basis (approximately US$0.3). • revenues from the sale of compost (US$0.08 /kg) and revenues from the sale of recyclable materials like hard plastics, card board, glass and metals. 6-8 8-10 10-11 11-15 15-17 17-20 30-34 50-58 67-75 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 waste generation rate (kg/capita/day) income range (USD/capita/month) Fig. 8. Variation of per capita waste generation rate with respect to per capita income Composting Barrel for Sustainable Organic WasteManagement in Bangladesh 85 Item Cost US$/year Item Revenue US$/year Depreciation cost for collection Investment (life time 5 years) 2422 Collection fees 3000 Compost sales 12458 Operation cost for collection and composting 10152 Recyclables 333 Total 12574 Total 15788 Table 2. Yearly costs and revenues of modified composting barrel plant (including collection) Table 2 gives the summary of costs and revenues for a modified composting plant of capacity of 1.865 tons/day on a yearly basis. It is seen that the plant is financially viable when operating at 1.865 tons/day. It is evident that the revenues from the collection fees are partly cross-subsidizing the composting activities. Hence, it seems advisable to combine composting activities with neighborhood waste collection to ensure a viable operation of the scheme. An additional advantage of a combination of waste collection and composting is the direct influence on improving waste composition for composting in the collection area, as continuous contact with the customers is available and appropriate information may be disseminated (e.g. promoting source separation and separate collection). The depreciation was calculated using a lifetime of 5 years and interest rate of 15%. The cost items comprise barrel modification plant set up, salaries and uniforms of the employees both for collection and in the composting plant, maintenance of collection vehicles, and expenses for electricity and water. Total revenues from the sale of the recyclables such as hard plastics, cardboards, glass and metal are US$333. The benefit-cost ratio of the modified composting barrel plant is > 1. Financial analysis confirms the results of other investigations on decentralized urban composting plants, showing that small-scale plants struggle with their economic viability if all costs have to be covered by the plant revenues (Lardinois & Furedy, 1999). However, our results show that a plant of capacity 1.865 ton/day may be viable in the study area where the rent for land is relatively smaller than the capital city as land acquisition in urban areas is always one financial key obstacle for initiating a composting plant. The decentralized waste collection and composting activity relieves a certain burden from municipal budgets in the study area (Zurbrugg et al., 2005). The municipal waste transportation and landfill costs can be reduced approximately by US$9500 per year. This estimate takes into account that the composting plant reduces the amount of waste, which needs to be transported by municipal trucks as well the reduction of the municipal expenses for its final disposal. With or without municipal support, any composting plant should however focus on long-term financial feasibility where operational costs are covered by revenues. Therefore, marketing strategies and the development of a market for compost are crucial for the long term success of a composting plant (Zurbrugg et al., 2005). 5. Conclusions Reduction of waste volume was faster in the modified composting barrel than the conventional barrel reactor. The volume becomes 50% and 70% of its original volume before WasteManagement 86 and after modification of the composting barrel, respectively after 4 weeks. The barrel composting was operated in the mesophilic and thermophilic temperature bend, which was very effective for proper composting operation. The quality of compost in terms of C/N ratio is better in the modified composting barrel than the conventional barrel. Nutrient concentrations of compost, produced in the modified composting barrel, were also satisfactory. The biochemical quality of the compost produced in the modified composting barrel was found suitable. The benefit-cost ratio for large scale modified composting barrel plants is more than 1. Thus, the modified composting barrel can be an eco-friendly, efficient and a sustainable solution of organic wastemanagement alternative in Bangladesh. 6. References Ahmed, M. F., Rahman, M. M., 2000. Water Supply and Sanitation: Rural and low income urban communities, ITN-Bangladesh, Center for Water Supply and Waste Management, BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ASija, A. K., Pareek, R. P., Singhania, R. A., Singh, S., 1984. Effect of method of preparation and enrichment on the quality of manure. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Sci. 32, 323-329. Bhide, A. D., Sundersan B. B., 1983. Solid wastemanagement in developing countries, Indian National Scientific Documentation Center, New Delhi. Chang, I. J.; Tsai, J. J.; Wu, H. K., 2006. Thermophilic composting of food waste. Bioresource Technol. 97, 116-122. Dresboll, B. D., Kristensen, K. T., 2005. Delayed nutrient application affects mineralization rate during composting of plant residues. Bioresource Technol. 96, 1093-1101. Fang, M., Wong, J. W. C., 1999. Effect of lime amendment on availability of heavy metals and maturation in sewage sludge composting. Journal of Environmental Pollution. 106(1), 83-89. Golueke, C. G., 1972. Biological Reclamation of Solid Wastes. Rodale Press, Emmanus, USA. Gantzer C., P. Gaspard, L. Galvez, A. Huyard, N. Dumouthier, J. Schwartzbrod. 2001. Monitoring of bacterial and parasitological contamination during various treatment of sludge. Wat. Res. 35(16), 3763-3770. Goyal, S., Dhull, S. K. and Kapoor, K. K., 2005. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic waste and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1584-1591. Hong, J. H., Park, K. J., 2005. Compost biofiltration of ammonia gas from bin composting. Bioresource Technology, 96, 741-745. Iyengar, R. S., Bhave, P.P., 2006. In-Vessel composting of household wastes. Waste Management. 26, 1070–1080. Jackson, M. L., 1973. Chemical analysis of soil. McGraw Hill Publications Company. Li, G. X., Zhang, F. S., 2000. Solid waste composting and production of fertilizer. Chinese Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, P R China. Composting Barrel for Sustainable Organic WasteManagement in Bangladesh 87 Moqsud, M. A., 2003. A study on composting of solid waste. A Thesis of Masters of Science in Environmental Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Moqsud, M. A; Rahman, M. H., 2004. Composting of Kitchen garbage in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the sixth international summer symposium, Japan Society of Civil Engineering, Saitama, Japan, p. 413-416. Moqsud, M.A; Rahman, M.H., 2005. Biochemical quality of compost from kitchen garbage of Bangladesh. Proceedings of the 20 th International conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, Philadelphia, p. 440-447, USA. Moqsud, M.A, Rahman, M.H, Hayashi, S., Du, Y.J., 2005a. An assessment of modified composting barrel for sustainable wastemanagement in tropical regions. 4 th International conference on Environmental Informatics, July 26-28, Xiamen, China. p. 130-136. Nakasaki, K.; Yaguchi, H., Sasaki, Y., Kubota, H., 1993. Effects of pH control on composting of garbage. Wastemanagement and Research. 11(2), 117-125. Pfammatter R., Schertenleib R., 1996. Non-governmental refuse collection in low-income urban areas. Lessons learned from selected in Asia, Africa and Latin America. SANDEC Report No.1/96.Water and sanitation in developing countries EAWAG/SANDEC, Duebendrof , Switzerland. Polprasert, C., 1996. Organic waste recycling-technology and management. Wiley, Chichester, west Sussex, England. Rahman, M. H., 1993. Recycling of solid waste in Bangladesh. The International Journal of Environmental Education & Information.UK, 12(4), 337-342. Rahman, M. H., 2004. Composting of Solid waste in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the 19 th international conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, Philadelphia, USA p 45-49. Sinha, A. H. M. M. and Enayetullah, I., 2001. Solid wastemanagement with Resource recovery options. Proceeding of the International Conference on Professional Development Program 4, Center for Environmental and resource Management, Dhaka, 2-4 February, p. 32-37. Sujauddin, M., Huda S. M. S, Hoque, R., 2008. Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong, Bangladesh. WasteManagement 28, 1688-1695. Sundberg, C., Smars, S., 2004. Low pH as an inhibiting factor in the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic phase in composting. Bioresource Technol. 96, 746-752. Tchobanoglous, G., 1977. Solid Waste: Engineering Principles and Management Issue, McGraw Hill Publications Company, New York. Verma, L. N., Rawat, A. K., Rathore, G. S., 1999. Composting process as influenced by the method of aeration. Journal of Indian Society of soil sci. 47 (2), 368-371. Vesilind, P. A., Rimer, A. E., 1981. Unit operations in resource recovery engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jercy. Witter, E., Lopeaz-Real, J. M., 1988. Nitrogen losses during the composting of sewage sludge and the effectiveness of clay soil, zeolite and compost in adsorbing the volatilized ammonia. Biological Wastes 23, 279-294. WasteManagement 88 Zheng, G. D., Chen, T. B., 2004. Dynamic of Lead specialization in sewage sludge composting. Journal of Water Sci. and Technol. 50(9), 75-82. Zurbrugg, C., Drescher, S., Rytz, I., Sinha, A. M., Enayettullah, I., 2005. Decentralized composting in Bangladesh, a win-win situation for all stakeholders. Resources conservation and recycling. 43 , 281-292 6 Solid WasteManagement through the Application of Thermal Methods Konstantinos Moustakas and Maria Loizidou National Technical University of Athens, School of Chemical Engineering, Unit of Environmental Science & Technology 9, Heroon Polytechniou Street, Zographou Campus, Athens Greece 1. Introduction Human life in modern societies is inevitably related to waste generation. Around 255 million tones of municipal solid waste were generated in the 27 Member-States of the European Union in 2006, an increase of 13% in comparison to 1995. This represented an average of 517 kg of municipal waste per capita, an increase of 9% over 1995. Therefore, it is not strange that wastemanagement has become a crucial subject with increasing interest for scientists, local authorities, companies and simple citizens. The effective management of solid waste involves the application of various treatment methods, technologies and practices. All applied technologies and systems must ensure the protection of the public health and the environment. Apart from sanitary landfill, mechanical recycling and common recycling routes for different target materials, the technologies that are applied for the management of domestic solid waste include biological treatment (composting, anaerobic digestion) and thermal treatment technologies (incineration, pyrolysis, gasification, plasma technology). Fig. 1. Different biological and thermal methods for solid waste managementWasteManagement 90 This chapter focuses on the description of the alternative thermal practices for municipal solid waste management. Thermal methods for wastemanagement aim at the reduction of the waste volume, the conversion of waste into harmless materials and the utilization of the energy that is hidden within waste as heat, steam, electrical energy or combustible material. They include all processes converting the waste content into gas, liquid and solid products with simultaneous or consequent release of thermal energy. According to the New Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC, the waste treatment methods are categorized as “Disposal” or “Recovery” and the thermal management practices that are accompanied by significant energy recovery are included in the “Recovery” category. In addition, the pyramid of the priorities in the wastemanagement sector shows that energy recovery is more desired option in relation to the final disposal. Fig. 2. Pyramid of the priorities in the wastemanagement sector That is why more and more countries around the world develop and apply Waste-to-Energy technologies in order to handle the constantly increasing generated municipal waste. Technologically advanced countries in the domain of wastemanagement are characterized by increased recycling rates and, at the same time, operation of a high number of Waste-to- Energy facilities (around 420 in the 27 European Member-States). More specifically, on the basis of Eurostat data the percentages of municipal waste treated with thermal methods for the year 2007 in Denmark, Sweden, Luxembourg, Netherlands, France (Autret et al., 2007), Germany, Belgium and Austria were 53%, 47%, 47%, 38%, 36%, 35%, 34% and 28% respectively. On the other hand, there are still Member-States that do not apply thermal techniques in order to handle the generated municipal waste, especially in the southern Europe and the Baltic Sea. Such countries include Bulgaria, Estonia, Iceland, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, Malta, Poland, Romania and Greece. General information about the use of thermal technologies for solid wastemanagement around Europe and worldwide is provided. Data referring to incineration – mass burn combustion, pyrolysis, gasification and plasma technology is presented. The different aspects of each technology, the indicative respective reactions, as well as the products of each thermal process, are described. The issue of air emissions and solid residues is addressed, while the requirements for cleaning systems are also discussed for each case. Dis p osal Munici p al Solid Waste Prevention Reuse Rec y clin g Recovery Energy Recovery Solid WasteManagement through the Application of Thermal Methods 91 Finally, the first attempt to treat municipal waste in Greece with the use of gasification / vitrification process is presented. 2. Incineration 2.1 General The incineration (combustion) of carbon-based materials in an oxygen-rich environment (greater than stoichiometric), typically at temperatures higher than 850 o , produces a waste gas composed primarily of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and water (H 2 O). Other air emissions are nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, etc. The inorganic content of the waste is converted to ash. This is the most common and well-proven thermal process using a wide variety of fuels. During the full combustion there is oxygen in excess and, consequently, the stoichiometric coefficient of oxygen in the combustion reaction is higher than the value “1”. In theory, if the coefficient is equal to “1”, no carbon monoxide (CO) is produced and the average gas temperature is 1,200°C. The reactions that are then taking place are: C + O 2 → CO 2 + 393.77J (1) CxHy + (x+ y/4) O 2 → xCO 2 + y/2 H 2 O (2) In the case of lack of oxygen, the reactions are characterized as incomplete combustion ones, where the produced CO 2 reacts with C that has not been consumed yet and is converted to CO at higher temperatures. C + CO 2 +172.58J → 2CO (3) The object of this thermal treatment method is the reduction of the volume of the treated waste with simultaneous utilization of the contained energy. The recovered energy could be used for: • heating • steam production • electric energy production The typical amount of net energy that can be produced per ton of domestic waste is about 0.7 MWh of electricity and 2 MWh of district heating. Thus, incinerating about 600 tones of waste per day, about 17 MW of electrical power and 1,200 MWh district heating could be produced each day. The method could be applied for the treatment of mixed solid waste as well as for the treatment of pre-selected waste. It can reduce the volume of the municipal solid waste by 90% and its weight by 75%. The incineration technology is viable for the thermal treatment of high quantities of solid waste (more than 100,000 tones per year). A number of preconditions have to be satisfied so that the complete combustion of the treated solid waste takes place: • adequate fuel material and oxidation means at the combustion heart • achievable ignition temperature • suitable mixture proportion • continuous removal of the gases that are produced during combustion • continuous removal of the combustion residues • maintenance of suitable temperature within the furnace • turbulent flow of gases • adequate residence time of waste at the combustion area (Gidarakos, 2006). WasteManagement 92 Fig. 3. A schematic diagram of incineration process The existing European legislative framework via the Directive 2000/76/EC prevents and limits as far as practicable negative effects on the environment, in particular pollution by emissions into air, soil, surface water and groundwater, and the resulting risks to human health, from the incineration and co-incineration of waste (European Commission, 2000). Photo 1. MSW incineration plants in Amsterdam, Brescia & Vienna respectively [...]... electrostatic precipitators (Allsopp et al., 2001) 2 Wastewater Wastewater is generated by the use of water during the incineration process and in particular: • extinguishing of ash (0.1 m3 of water/tn of waste) • cooling of air gasses (2 m3 of water/tn of waste) • wet absorbance towers (2 m3 of water/tn of waste) • electrostatic filters (precipitators) The wastewater stream contains suspended solids as... anode and the cathode When the particles enter the cathode field, they are charged and the negative ones are moving to the positive pole (anode) The velocity of the particles depends on the weight and the Coulomb forces that are developed 96 WasteManagement Cyclones: They are based on the development of centrifugal force at the entry of gases at a symmetrical area The particles due to the centrifugal... feedstocks: Solid WasteManagement through the Application of Thermal Methods 99 Fig 7 A schematic diagram of gasification process • • • Solids: All types of coal and petroleum coke (a low value byproduct of refining) and biomass, such as wood waste, agricultural waste and household waste Liquids: Liquid refinery residuals (including asphalts, bitumen, and other oil sands residues) and liquid waste from chemical... introduced (European Commission, 20 06) 3 Gasification 3.1 General Gasification is the thermal process that converts carbon-containing materials, such as coal, petcoke, biomass, sludge, domestic solid waste to syngas which can then be used to produce electric power, valuable products, such as chemicals, fertilizers, substitute natural gas, 98 Waste Management Fig 6 three types of incinerators: (a) fixed... initial waste and are categorized into: • Residues that go out of the grates: 20 - 35% • Residues that go through the grates: 1 - 2% The residues are collected at hoppers where they are transferred with specific system for cooling Emission control system The role of the emission system control focuses on particles, HCl, HF, SO2, dioxins and heavy metals and is discussed below (Niessen, 2002) 94 Waste Management. .. fixed grate, rotary-kiln, fluidized bed, etc (Fig 6) Moving grate The typical incineration plant for domestic solid waste is a moving grate incinerator The moving grate enables the movement of waste through the combustion chamber to be optimized to allow more efficient and complete combustion A single moving grate boiler can handle up to 35 tones of waste per hour, and can operate 8,000 hours per year... month's duration Moving grate incinerators are sometimes referred to as Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators The waste is introduced by a waste crane through the "throat" at one end of the grate, from where it moves down over the descending grate to the ash pit in the other end Here the ash is removed through a water lock Part of the combustion air (primary combustion air) is supplied through the grate from... SO2), excess of oxygen, dust particles as well as other compounds The presence and the concentration of other compounds, such as ΗCl, HF, suspended particles which contain heavy metals, dioxins and furans, depend on the composition of the waste that is subjected to incineration During incineration, a quantity of 4,000 – 5,000 m3 of air emissions is generated per ton of waste Air emissions must be controlled...Solid Waste Management through the Application of Thermal Methods 93 2.2 Typical Incineration plant A typical incineration plant includes: Weighing System The system for weighing solid waste aims at the control and recording of the incoming loads and it has to be practical so as to minimize the time that vehicles remain at this point Reception Site Due to the fact that waste does not arrive... to remove the suspended particles and the gas pollutants, different cleaning systems can be applied Indicatively, deposition chambers, where 40% of suspended solids is removed, cyclones (removal efficiency 60 -80%), wet cleaning towers (removal efficiency 80-95%), electrostatic precipitators (removal efficiency 99-99.5%) and bagfilters (removal efficiency 99.9%) are referred Apart from the removal of . solid waste management Waste Management 90 This chapter focuses on the description of the alternative thermal practices for municipal solid waste management. Thermal methods for waste management. resource Management, Dhaka, 2-4 February, p. 32-37. Sujauddin, M., Huda S. M. S, Hoque, R., 2008. Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Waste Management. of household wastes. Waste Management. 26, 1070–1080. Jackson, M. L., 1973. Chemical analysis of soil. McGraw Hill Publications Company. Li, G. X., Zhang, F. S., 2000. Solid waste composting