Báo cáo hóa học: " Research Article Existence of Pseudo Almost Automorphic Solutions for the Heat Equation with Sp -Pseudo Almost Automorphic Coefficients" docx
Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 19 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
19
Dung lượng
576,81 KB
Nội dung
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Boundary Value Problems Volume 2009, Article ID 182527, 19 pages doi:10.1155/2009/182527 ResearchArticleExistenceofPseudoAlmostAutomorphicSolutionsfortheHeatEquationwith S p -PseudoAlmostAutomorphic Coefficients Toka Diagana 1 and Ravi P. Agarwal 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Howard University, 2441 6th Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA 2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Ravi P. Agarwal, agarwal@fit.edu Received 12 March 2009; Accepted 3 July 2009 Recommended by Veli Shakhmurov We obtain theexistenceofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to the N-dimensional heatequationwith S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic coefficients. Copyright q 2009 T. Diagana and R. P. Agarwal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. Introduction Let Ω ⊂ R N N ≥ 1 be an open bounded subset with C 2 boundary ∂Ω,andletX L 2 Ω be the space square integrable functions equipped with its natural · L 2 Ω topology. Of concern is the study ofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to the N-dimensional heatequationwith divergence t erms ∂ ∂t ϕ F t, Bϕ Δϕ G t, Bϕ ,t∈ R,x∈ Ω ϕ t, x 0,t∈ R,x∈ ∂Ω, 1.1 where the symbols B and Δ stand, respectively, forthe first- and second-order differential operators defined by B : N j1 ∂ ∂x j , Δ N j1 ∂ 2 ∂x 2 j , 1.2 and the coefficients F, G : R × H 1 0 Ω → L 2 Ω are S p -pseudoalmost automorphic. 2 Boundary Value Problems To analyze 1.1, our strategy will consist of studying theexistenceofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to the class of partial hyperbolic differential equations d dt u t f t, Bu t Au t g t, Cu t ,t∈ R, 1.3 where A : DA ⊂ X → X is a sectorial linear operator on a Banach space X whose corresponding analytic semigroup Tt t≥0 is hyperbolic; that is, σA ∩ iR ∅, the operator B, C are arbitrary linear possibly unbounded operators on X,andf, g are S p -pseudoalmostautomorphicfor p>1 and jointly continuous functions. Indeed, letting Aϕ Δϕ for all ϕ ∈ DAH 1 0 Ω ∩ H 2 Ω, Bϕ Bϕ Cϕ for all ϕ ∈ H 1 0 Ω, and f F and g G, one can readily see that 1.1 is a particular case of 1.3. The concept ofpseudoalmost automorphy, which is the central tool here, was recently introduced in literature by Liang et al. 1, 2. Thepseudoalmost automorphy is a generalization of both the classical almost automorphy due to Bochner 3 and that ofpseudoalmost periodicity due to Zhang 4–6. It has recently generated several developments and extensions. Forthe most recent developments, we refer the reader to 1, 2, 7–9. More recently, in Diagana 7, the concept of S p -pseudoalmost automorphy or Stepanov-like pseudoalmost automorphy was introduced. It should be mentioned that the S p -pseudoalmost automorphy is a natural generalization ofthe notion ofpseudoalmost automorphy. In this paper, we will make extensive use ofthe concept of S p -pseudoalmost automorphy combined withthe techniques of hyperbolic semigroups to study theexistenceofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to the class of partial hyperbolic differential equations appearing in 1.3 and then to the N-dimensional heatequation 1.1. In this paper, as in the recent papers 10–12, we consider a general intermediate space X α between DA and X. In contrast withthe fractional power spaces considered in some recent papers by Diagana 13, the interpolation and H ¨ older spaces, for instance, depend only on DA and X and can be explicitly expressed in many concrete cases. Literature related to those intermediate spaces is very extensive; in particular, we refer the reader to the excellent book by Lunardi 14, which contains a comprehensive presentation on this topic and related issues. Existence results related to pseudoalmost periodic and almostautomorphicsolutions to the partial hyperbolic differential equations ofthe form 1.3 have recently been established in 12, 15–18, respectively. Though to the best of our knowledge, theexistenceofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to theheatequation 1.1 in the case when the coefficients f, g are S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic is an untreated original problem and constitutes the main motivation ofthe present paper. 2. Preliminaries Let X, ·, Y, · Y be two Banach spaces. Let BCR, Xresp., BCR × Y, X denote the collection of all X-valued bounded continuous functions resp., the class of jointly bounded continuous functions F : R × Y → X. The space BCR, X equipped withthe sup norm · ∞ is a Banach space. Furthermore, CR, Yresp., CR × Y, X denotes the class of continuous functions from R into Y resp., the class of jointly continuous functions F : R × Y → X. Boundary Value Problems 3 The notation LX, Y stands forthe Banach space of bounded linear operators from X into Y equipped with its natural topology; in particular, this is simply denoted LX whenever X Y. Definition 2.1 see 19. The Bochner transform f b t, s, t ∈ R, s ∈ 0, 1 of a function f : R → X is defined by f b t, s : ft s. Remark 2.2. i A function ϕt, s, t ∈ R, s ∈ 0, 1, is the Bochner transform of a certain function f, ϕt, sf b t, s, if and only if ϕt τ, s − τϕs, t for all t ∈ R, s ∈ 0, 1 and τ ∈ s − 1,s. ii Note that if f h ϕ, then f b h b ϕ b . Moreover, λf b λf b for each scalar λ. Definition 2.3. The Bochner transform F b t, s, u, t ∈ R, s ∈ 0, 1, u ∈ X of a function Ft, u on R × X, with values in X, is defined by F b t, s, u : Ft s, u for each u ∈ X. Definition 2.4. Let p ∈ 1, ∞. The space BS p X of all Stepanov bounded functions, withthe exponent p, consists of all measurable functions f : R → X such that f b ∈ L ∞ R; L p 0, 1, X. This is a Banach space withthe norm f S p : f b L ∞ R,L p sup t∈R t1 t fτ p dτ 1/p . 2.1 2.1. S p -PseudoAlmost Periodicity Definition 2.5. A function f ∈ CR, X is called Bohr almost periodic if for each ε>0 there exists lε > 0 such that every interval of length lε contains a number τ withthe property that f t τ − f t <ε for each t ∈ R. 2.2 The number τ above is called an ε-translation number of f, and the collection of all such functions will be denoted AP X. Definition 2.6. A function F ∈ CR × Y, X is called Bohr almost periodic in t ∈ R uniformly in y ∈ K where K ⊂ Y is any compact subset K ⊂ Y if for each ε>0 there exists lε such that every interval of length lε contains a number τ withthe property that F t τ, y − F t, y <ε for each t ∈ R,y∈ K. 2.3 The collection of those functions is denoted by APR × Y. Define the classes of functions PAP 0 X and PAP 0 R × X, respectively, as follows: PAP 0 X : u ∈ BC R, X : lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T u s ds 0 , 2.4 4 Boundary Value Problems and PAP 0 R × Y is the collection of all functions F ∈ BCR × Y, X such that lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T F t, u dt 0 2.5 uniformly in u ∈ Y. Definition 2.7 see 13.Afunctionf ∈ BCR, X is called pseudoalmost periodic if it can be expressed as f h ϕ, where h ∈ APX and ϕ ∈ PAP 0 X. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAPX. Definition 2.8 see 13.AfunctionF ∈ CR × Y, X is said to be pseudoalmost periodic if it can be expressed as F G Φ, where G ∈ AP R × Y and φ ∈ PAP 0 R × Y. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAPR × Y. Define AA 0 R × Y as the collection of all functions F ∈ BCR × Y, X such that lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T F t, u dt 0 2.6 uniformly in u ∈ K, where K ⊂ Y is any bounded subset. Obviously, PAP 0 R × Y ⊂ AA 0 R × Y . 2.7 A weaker version of Definition 2.8 is the following. Definition 2.9. A function F ∈ CR × Y, X is said to be B-pseudo almost periodic if it can be expressed as F G Φ, where G ∈ APR × Y and φ ∈ AA 0 R × Y. The collection of such functions will be denoted by BPAPR × Y. Definition 2.10 see 20, 21.Afunctionf ∈ BS p X is called S p -pseudoalmost periodic or Stepanov-like pseudoalmost periodic if it can be expressed as f h ϕ, where h b ∈ APL p 0, 1, X and ϕ b ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAP p X. In other words, a function f ∈ L p loc R, X is said to be S p -pseudoalmost periodic if its Bochner transform f b : R → L p 0, 1, X is pseudoalmost periodic in the sense that there exist two functions h, ϕ : R → X such that f h ϕ, where h b ∈ APL p 0, 1, X and ϕ b ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. To define the notion of S p -pseudoalmost automorphy for functions ofthe form F : R × Y → Y, we need to define the S p -pseudoalmost periodicity for these functions as follows. Definition 2.11. A function F : R × Y → X, t, u → Ft, u with F·,u ∈ L p loc R, X for each u ∈ X,issaidtobeS p -pseudoalmost periodic if there exist two functions H, Φ : R × Y → X such that F H Φ, where H b ∈ APR × L p 0, 1, X and Φ b ∈ AA 0 R × L p 0, 1, X. Boundary Value Problems 5 The collection of those S p -pseudoalmost periodic functions F : R × Y → X will be denoted PAP p R × Y. 2.2. S p -Almost Automorphy The notion of S p -almost automorphy is a new notion due to N’Gu ´ er ´ ekata and Pankov 22. Definition 2.12 Bochner.Afunctionf ∈ CR, X is said to be almostautomorphic if for every sequence of real numbers s n n∈N there exists a subsequence s n n∈N such that g t : lim n →∞ f t s n 2.8 is well defined for each t ∈ R,and lim n →∞ g t − s n f t 2.9 for each t ∈ R. Remark 2.13. The function g in Definition 2.12 is measurable but not necessarily continuous. Moreover, if g is continuous, then f is uniformly continuous. If the convergence above is uniform in t ∈ R, then f is almost periodic. Denote by AAX the collection of all almostautomorphic functions R → X.NotethatAAX equipped withthe sup norm, · ∞ , turns out to be a Banach space. We will denote by AA u X the closed subspace of all functions f ∈ AAX with g ∈ CR, X. Equivalently, f ∈ AA u X if and only if f is almost automorphic, and the convergences in Definition 2.12 are uniform on compact intervals, that is, in the Fr ´ echet space CR, X. Indeed, if f is almost automorphic, then its range is relatively compact. Obviously, the following inclusions hold: AP X ⊂ AA u X ⊂ AA X ⊂ BC X . 2.10 Definition 2.14 see 22. The space AS p X of Stepanov-like almostautomorphic functions or S p -almost automorphic consists of all f ∈ BS p X such that f b ∈ AAL p 0, 1; X.That is, a function f ∈ L p loc R; X is said to be S p -almost automorphic if its Bochner transform f b : R → L p 0, 1; X is almostautomorphic in the sense that for every sequence of real numbers s n n∈N there exists a subsequence s n n∈N and a function g ∈ L p loc R; X such that t1 t f s n s − g s p ds 1/p −→ 0, t1 t g s − s n − f s p ds 1/p −→ 0 2.11 as n →∞pointwise on R. 6 Boundary Value Problems Remark 2.15. It is clear that if 1 ≤ p<q<∞ and f ∈ L q loc R; X is S q -almost automorphic, then f is S p -almost automorphic. Also if f ∈ AAX, then f is S p -almost automorphicfor any 1 ≤ p<∞. Moreover, it is clear that f ∈ AA u X if and only if f b ∈ AAL ∞ 0, 1; X.Thus, AA u X can be considered as AS ∞ X. Definition 2.16. A function F : R × Y → X, t, u → Ft, u with F·,u ∈ L p loc R; X for each u ∈ Y,issaidtobeS p -almost automorphic in t ∈ R uniformly in u ∈ Y if t → Ft, u is S p - almostautomorphicfor each u ∈ Y; that is, for every sequence of real numbers s n n∈N , there exists a subsequence s n n∈N and a function G·,u ∈ L p loc R; X such that t1 t Fs n s, u − G s, u p ds 1/p −→ 0, t1 t Gs − s n ,u − F s, u p ds 1/p −→ 0 2.12 as n →∞pointwise on R for each u ∈ Y. The collection of those S p -almost automorphic functions F : R×Y → X will be denoted by AS p R × Y. 2.3. PseudoAlmost Automorphy The notion ofpseudoalmost automorphy is a new notion due to Liang et al. 2, 9. Definition 2.17. A function f ∈ CR, X is called pseudoalmostautomorphic i f it can be expressed as f h ϕ, where h ∈ AAX and ϕ ∈ PAP 0 X. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAAX. Obviously, the following inclusions hold: AP X ⊂ PAP X ⊂ PAA X ,AP X ⊂ AA X ⊂ PAA X . 2.13 Definition 2.18. A function F ∈ CR × Y, X is said to be pseudoalmostautomorphic if it can be expressed as F G Φ, where G ∈ AAR × Y and ϕ ∈ AA 0 R × Y. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAAR × Y. A substantial result is the next theorem, which is due to Liang et al. 2. Theorem 2.19 see 2. The space PAAX equipped withthe sup norm · ∞ is a Banach space. We also have the following composition result. Theorem 2.20 see 2. If f : R × Y → X belongs to PAAR × Y and if x → ft, x is uniformly continuous on any bounded subset K of Y for each t ∈ R, then the function defined by htft, ϕt belongs to PAAX provided ϕ ∈ PAAY. Boundary Value Problems 7 3. S p -PseudoAlmost Automorphy This section is devoted to the notion of S p -pseudoalmost automorphy. Such a concept is completely new and is due to Diagana 7. Definition 3.1 see 7.Afunctionf ∈ BS p X is called S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic or Stepanov-like pseudoalmost automorphic if it can be expressed as f h ϕ, 3.1 where h b ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X and ϕ b ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. The collection of such functions will be denoted by PAA p X. Clearly, a function f ∈ L p loc R, X is said to be S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic if its Bochner transform f b : R → L p 0, 1, X is pseudoalmostautomorphic in the sense that there exist two functions h, ϕ : R → X such that f h ϕ, where h b ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X and ϕ b ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. Theorem 3.2 see 7. If f ∈ PAAX,thenf ∈ PAA p X for each 1 ≤ p<∞. In other words, PAAX ⊂ PAA p X. Obviously, the following inclusions hold: AP X ⊂ PAP X ⊂ PAA X ⊂ PAA p X , AP X ⊂ AA X ⊂ PAA X ⊂ PAA p X . 3.2 Theorem 3.3 see 7. The space PAA p X equipped withthe norm · S p is a Banach space. Definition 3.4. A function F : R × Y → X, t, u → Ft, u with F·,u ∈ L p R, X for each u ∈ Y, is said to be S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic if there exists two functions H, Φ : R × Y → X such that F H Φ, 3.3 where H b ∈ AAR × L p 0, 1, X and Φ b ∈ AA 0 R × L p 0, 1, X. The collection of those S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic functions will be denoted by PAA p R × Y. We have the following composition theorems. Theorem 3.5. Let F : R × X → X be a S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic function. Suppose that Ft, u is Lipschitzian in u ∈ X uniformly in t ∈ R; that is there exists L>0 such F t, u − F t, v ≤ L · u − v 3.4 for all t ∈ R, u, v ∈ X × X. If φ ∈ PAA p X,thenΓ : R → X defined byΓ· : F·,φ· belongs to PAA p X. 8 Boundary Value Problems Proof. Let F H Φ, where H b ∈ AAR × L p 0, 1, X and Φ b ∈ AA 0 R × L p 0, 1, X. Similarly, let φ φ 1 φ 2 , where φ b 1 ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X and φ b 2 ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X,thatis, lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T t1 t ϕ 2 σ p dσ 1/p dt 0 3.5 for all t ∈ R. It is obvious to see that F b ·,φ· : R → L p 0, 1, X. Now decompose F b as follows: F b ·,φ · H b ·,φ 1 · F b ·,φ · − H b ·,φ 1 · H b ·,φ 1 · F b ·,φ · − F b ·,φ 1 · Φ b ·,φ 1 · . 3.6 Using the theorem of composition ofalmostautomorphic functions, it is easy to see that H b ·,φ 1 · ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X.Now,set G b · : F b ·,φ · − F b ·,φ 1 · . 3.7 Clearly, G b · ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. Indeed, we have t1 t Gσ p dσ t1 t Fσ, φσ − Fσ, φ 1 σ p dσ ≤ L p t1 t φσ − φ 1 σ p dσ L p t1 t φ 2 σ p dσ, 3.8 and hence for T>0, 1 2T T −T t1 t Gσ p dσ 1/p dt ≤ L 2T T −T t1 t φ 2 σ p dσ 1/p dt. 3.9 Now using 3.5, it follows that lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T t1 t Gσ p dσ 1/p dt 0. 3.10 Using the theorem of composition of functions of PAPL p 0, 1, X see 13 it is easy to see that Φ b ·,φ 1 · ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. Theorem 3.6. Let F H Φ: R × X → X be an S p -pseudoalmostautomorphic function, where H b ∈ AAR × L p 0, 1, X and Φ b ∈ AA 0 R × L p 0, 1, X. Suppose that Ft, u and Φt, x are Boundary Value Problems 9 uniformly continuous in every bounded s ubset K ⊂ X uniformly for t ∈ R.Ifg ∈ PAA p X,then Γ : R → X defined by Γ· : F·,g· belongs to PAA p X. Proof. Let F H Φ, where H b ∈ AAR × L p 0, 1, X and Φ b ∈ AA 0 R × L p 0, 1, X. Similarly, let g φ 1 φ 2 , where φ b 1 ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X and φ b 2 ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. It is obvious to see that F b ·,g· : R → L p 0, 1, X. Now decompose F b as follows: F b ·,g · H b ·,φ 1 · F b ·,g · − H b ·,φ 1 · H b ·,φ 1 · F b ·,g · − F b ·,φ 1 · Φ b ·,φ 1 · . 3.11 Using the theorem of composition ofalmostautomorphic functions, it is easy to see that H b ·,φ 1 · ∈ AAL p 0, 1, X.Now,set G b · : F b ·,g · − F b ·,φ 1 · . 3.12 We claim that G b · ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. First of all, note that the uniformly continuity of F on bounded subsets K ⊂ X yields the uniform continuity of its Bohr transform F b on bounded subsets of X. Since both g,φ 1 are bounded functions, it follows that there exists K ⊂ X a bounded subset such that gσ,φ 1 σ ∈ K for each σ ∈ R. Now from the uniform continuity of F b on bounded subsets of X, it obviously follows that F b is uniformly continuous on K uniformly for each t ∈ R. Therefore for every ε>0 there exists δ>0 such that for all X, Y ∈ K with X − Y <δyield F b σ, X − F b σ, X <ε ∀σ ∈ R. 3.13 Using the proof ofthe composition theorem 2, Theorem 2.4, applied to F b it follows lim T →∞ 1 2T T −T t1 t Gσ p dσ 1/p dt 0. 3.14 Using the theorem of composition 2, Theorem 2.4 for functions of PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X it is easy to see that Φ b ·,φ 1 · ∈ PAP 0 L p 0, 1, X. 4. Sectorial Linear Operators Definition 4.1. A linear operator A : DA ⊂ X → X not necessarily densely defined is said to be sectorial if the following holds: there exist constants ω ∈ R, θ ∈ π/2,π,andM>0 such that ρA ⊃ S θ,ω , S θ,ω : λ ∈ C : λ / ω, arg λ − ω <θ , R λ, A ≤ M | λ − ω | ,λ∈ S θ,ω . 4.1 10 Boundary Value Problems The class of sectorial operators is very rich and contains most of classical operators encountered in literature. Example 4.2. Let p ≥ 1andletΩ ⊂ R d be open bounded subset with regular boundary ∂Ω. Let X :L p Ω, · p be the Lebesgue space. Define the linear operator A as follows: D A W 2,p Ω ∩ W 1,p 0 Ω ,A ϕ Δϕ, ∀ϕ ∈ D A . 4.2 It can be checked that the operator A is sectorial on L p Ω. It is wellknown that 14 if A is sectorial, then it generates an analytic semigroup Tt t≥0 , which maps 0, ∞ into BX and such that there exist M 0 ,M 1 > 0with T t ≤ M 0 e ωt ,t>0, 4.3 t A − ω T t ≤ M 1 e ωt ,t>0. 4.4 Throughout the rest ofthe paper, we suppose that the semigroup Tt t≥0 is hyperbolic; that is, there exist a projection P and constants M, δ > 0 such that Tt commutes with P, NP is invariant with respect to Tt, Tt : RQ → RQ is invertible, and the following hold: T t Px ≤ Me −δt x for t ≥ 0, 4.5 T t Qx ≤ Me δt x for t ≤ 0, 4.6 where Q : I − P and, for t ≤ 0, T t :T−t −1 . Recall that the analytic semigroup Tt t≥0 associated with A is hyperbolic if and only if σ A ∩ iR ∅, 4.7 see details in 23, Proposition 1.15, page 305 Definition 4.3. Let α ∈ 0, 1. A Banach space X α , · α is said to be an intermediate space between DA and X, or a space of class J α ,ifDA ⊂ X α ⊂ X, and there is a constant c>0 such that x α ≤ c x 1−α x α A ,x∈ D A , 4.8 where · A is the graph norm of A. [...]... L Ω with We require the following assumption H.3 Let 1/2 < β < 1, let F : R × H1 Ω → Xβ be an Sp-pseudoalmostautomorphic 0 function in t ∈ R uniformly in u ∈ H1 Ω , and let G : R × H1 Ω → L2 Ω be 0 0 Sp-pseudoalmostautomorphic in t ∈ R uniformly in u ∈ H1 Ω Moreover, the 0 functions F, G are uniformly Lipschitz with respect to the second argument in the following sense: there exists K > 0 such... vol 192, pp 543–561, 1995 6 C Y Zhang, “Integration of vector-valued pseudo- almost periodic functions,” Proceedings ofthe American Mathematical Society, vol 121, pp 167–174, 1994 7 T Diagana, Existenceofpseudoalmostautomorphicsolutions to some abstract differential equations withSp-pseudoalmostautomorphic coefficients,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 70, no 11, pp 3781–3790,... Problems 11 Concrete examples of Xα include D −Aα for α ∈ 0, 1 , the domains ofthe fractional powers of A, the real interpolation spaces DA α, ∞ , α ∈ 0, 1 , defined as the space of all x ∈ X such x α sup t1−α AT t x < ∞ 4.9 0 . Problems Volume 2009, Article ID 182527, 19 pages doi:10.1155/2009/182527 Research Article Existence of Pseudo Almost Automorphic Solutions for the Heat Equation with S p -Pseudo Almost Automorphic Coefficients Toka. 2009 Recommended by Veli Shakhmurov We obtain the existence of pseudo almost automorphic solutions to the N-dimensional heat equation with S p -pseudo almost automorphic coefficients. Copyright q 2009. mentioned that the S p -pseudo almost automorphy is a natural generalization of the notion of pseudo almost automorphy. In this paper, we will make extensive use of the concept of S p -pseudo almost automorphy