báo cáo hóa học:" Research Article Time-Scale-Dependent Criteria for the Existence of Positive Solutions to p-Laplacian Multipoint Boundary Value Problem" pdf
Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 20 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
20
Dung lượng
560,73 KB
Nội dung
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Difference Equations Volume 2010, Article ID 746106, 20 pages doi:10.1155/2010/746106 ResearchArticleTime-Scale-DependentCriteriafortheExistenceofPositiveSolutionstop-LaplacianMultipointBoundaryValue Problem Wenyong Zhong 1 and Wei Lin 2 1 School of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Jishou University, Hunan 416000, China 2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China Correspondence should be addressed to Wei Lin, wlin@fudan.edu.cn Received 1 May 2010; Revised 23 July 2010; Accepted 30 July 2010 Academic Editor: Alberto Cabada Copyright q 2010 W. Zhong and W. Lin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. By virtue ofthe Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem and the five functionals fixed point theorem, we analytically establish several sufficient criteriafortheexistenceof at least two or three positivesolutions in thep-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales with a particular kind ofp-Laplacian and m-point boundaryvalue condition. It is this kind ofboundaryvalue condition that leads the established criteriato be d ependent on the time scales. Also we provide a representative and nontrivial example to illustrate a possible application ofthe analytical results established. We believe that the established analytical results and the example together guarantee the reliability of numerical computation of those p-Laplacian and m-point boundaryvalue problems on time scales. 1. Introduction The investigation of dynamic equations on time scales, originally attributed to Stefan Hilger’s seminal work 1, 2 two decades ago, is now undergoing a rapid development. It not only unifies the existing results and principles for both differential equations and difference equations with constant time stepsize but also invites novel and nontrivial discussions and theories for hybrid equations on various types of time scales 3–11. On the other hand, along with the significant development ofthe theories, practical applications of dynamic equations on time scales in mathematical modeling of those real processes and phenomena, such as the population dynamics, the economic evolutions, the chemical kinetics, and the neural signal processing, have been becoming richer and richer 12, 13. 2 Advances in Difference Equations As one ofthe focal topics in theresearchof dynamic equations on time scales, the study ofboundaryvalue problems for some specific dynamic equations on time scales recently has elicited a great deal of attention from mathematical community 14–33. In particular, a series of works have been presented to discuss theexistenceofpositivesolutions in theboundaryvalue problems forthe second-order equations on time scales 14–21. More recently, some analytical criteria have been established for t he existenceofpositivesolutions in some specific boundaryvalue problems forthep-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales 22, 33. Concretely, He 25 investigated the following dynamic equation: φ p u Δ t ∇ h t f u 0,t∈ 0,T T , 1.1 with theboundaryvalue conditions u Δ 0 0,u T B 0 u Δ η 0. 1.2 Here and throughout, T is supposed to be a time scale; that is, T is any nonempty closed subset of real numbers in R with order and topological structure defined in a canonical way. The closed interval in T is defined as a, b T a, b ∩ T. Accordingly, the open interval and the half-open interval could be defined, respectively. In addition, it is assumed that 0,T∈ T, η ∈ 0,ρT T , f ∈ C ld 0, ∞, 0, ∞, h ∈ C ld 0,T T , 0, ∞,andbx B 0 x bx for some positive constants b and b. Moreover, φ p u is supposed to be thep-Laplacian operator, that is, φ p u|u| p−2 u and φ p −1 φ q , in which p>1and1/p1/q 1. With these configurations and with t he aid ofthe Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem 34, He established thecriteriafortheexistenceof at least two positivesolutions in 1.1 fulfilling theboundaryvalue conditions 1.2. Later on, Su and Li 24 discussed the dynamic equation 1.1 which satisfies theboundaryvalue conditions u Δ 0 0,u T B 0 m−2 i1 b i u Δ ξ i 0, 1.3 where ξ ∈ 0,T,0<ξ 1 <ξ 2 < ··· <ξ m−2 <T,andb i ∈ 0, ∞ for i 1, 2, ,m − 2.By virtue ofthe five functionals fixed point theorem 35, they proved that the dynamic equation 1.1 with conditions 1.3 has three positivesolutions at least. Meanwhile, He and Li in 26, studied the dynamic equation 1.1 satisfying either theboundaryvalue conditions u 0 − B 0 u Δ 0 0,u Δ T 0, 1.4 or the conditions u Δ 0 0,u T B 0 u Δ T 0. 1.5 Advances in Difference Equations 3 In the light ofthe five functionals fixed point theorem, they established thecriteriafortheexistenceof at least three solutionsforthe dynamic equation 1.1 either with conditions 1.4 or with conditions 1.5. More recently, Yaslan 27, 28 investigated the dynamic equation: u Δ∇ t h t f t, u t 0,t∈ t 1 ,t 3 T ⊂ T, 1.6 which satisfies either theboundaryvalue conditions αu t 1 − β 0 u Δ t 1 u Δ t 2 ,u Δ t 3 0, 1.7 or the conditions u Δ t 1 0,αu t 3 βu Δ t 3 u Δ t 2 . 1.8 Here, 0 t 1 <t 2 <t 3 , α>0, β 0 0, and β>1. Indeed, Yaslan analytically established the conditions fortheexistenceof at least two or three positivesolutions in these boundaryvalue problems by virtue ofthe Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem and the Leggett-Williams fixed point theorem 36. I t is worthwhile to mention that these theoretical results are novel even for some special cases on time scales, such as the conventional difference equations with fixed time stepsize and the ordinary differential equations. Motivated by the aforementioned results and techniques in coping with those boundaryvalue problems on time scales, we thus turn to investigate the possible existenceof multiple positivesolutionsforthe following one-dimensional p-Laplacian dynamic equation: φ p u Δ t ∇ h t f t, u t 0,t∈ 0,T T , 1.9 with thep-Laplacian and m-point boundaryvalue conditions: φ p u Δ 0 m−2 i1 a i φ p u Δ ξ i ,u T βB 0 u Δ T m−2 i1 B u Δ ξ i . 1.10 In the following discussion, we implement three hypotheses as follows. H 1 One has a i 0fori 1, ,m−2, 0<ξ 1 <ξ 2 < ···<ξ m−2 <T,andd 0 1− m−2 i1 a i >0. H 2 One has that h : 0,σT T → 0, ∞ is left dense continuous ld-continuous,and there exists a t 0 ∈ 0,T T such that ht 0 / 0. Also f : 0,σT T × 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous. H 3 Both B 0 and B are continuously odd functions defined on R. There exist two positive numbers b and b such that, for any v>0, b v B 0 v ,B v bv 1.11 4 Advances in Difference Equations and that βb − m − 2 b − μ T 0. 1.12 It is clear that, together with conditions 1.10 and the above hypotheses H 1 –H 3 ,the dynamic equation 1.9 not only covers the corresponding boundaryvalue problems in the literature, but even nontrivially generalizes these problems to a much wider class ofboundaryvalue problems on time scales. Also it is valuable to mention that condition 1.12 in hypothesis H 3 is necessarily relevant tothe graininess operator μ : T→0, ∞ around the time instant T. Such kind of condition has not been required in the literature, tothe best of authors’ knowledge. Thus, this paper analytically establishes some new and time-scale-dependentcriteriafortheexistenceof at least double or triple positivesolutions in theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 by virtue ofthe Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem and the five functionals fixed point theorem. Indeed, these obtained criteria significantly extend the results existing in 26–28. The remainder ofthe paper is organized as follows. Section 2 preliminarily provides some lemmas which are crucial tothe following discussion. Section 3 analytically establishes thecriteriafortheexistenceof at least two positivesolutions in theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 with the aid ofthe Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem. Section 4 gives some sufficient conditions fortheexistenceof at least three positivesolutions by means ofthe five functionals fixed point theorem. More importantly, Section 5 provides a representative and nontrivial example to illustrate a possible application ofthe obtained analytical results on dynamic equations on time scales. Finally, the paper is closed with some concluding remarks. 2. Preliminaries In this section, we intend to provide several lemmas which are crucial tothe proof ofthe main results in this paper. However, for concision, we omit the introduction of those elementary notations and definitions, which can be found in 11, 12, 33 and references therein. The following lemmas are based on the following linear boundaryvalue problems: φ p u Δ t ∇ g t 0,t∈ 0,T T , φ p u Δ 0 m−2 i1 a i φ p u Δ ξ i ,u T βB 0 u Δ T m−2 i1 B u Δ ξ i . 2.1 Advances in Difference Equations 5 Lemma 2.1. Assume that d 0 1 − m−2 i1 a i / 0. Then, for g ∈ C ld 0,T T , the linear boundaryvalue problems 2.1 have a unique solution satisfying u t T t φ q s 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ Δs βB 0 φ q T 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ − m−2 i1 B φ q ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ , 2.2 for all t ∈ 0,σT T . Proof. According tothe formula t a ft, sΔs Δ fσt,t t a ft, sΔs introduced in 12, we have u Δ t φ q − t 0 g τ ∇τ − 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ . 2.3 Thus, we obtain that φ p u Δ t − t 0 g τ ∇τ − 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ, 2.4 and that φ p u Δ t ∇ −g t . 2.5 To this end, it is not hard to check that ut satisfies 2.2, which implies that ut is a solution ofthe problems 2.1. Furthermore, in order to verify the uniqueness, we suppose that both u 1 t and u 2 t are thesolutionsofthe problems 2.1. T hen, we have φ p u Δ 1 t ∇ − φ p u Δ 2 t ∇ 0,t∈ 0,T T , 2.6 φ p u Δ 1 0 − φ p u Δ 2 0 m−2 i1 a i φ p u Δ 1 ξ i − φ p u Δ 2 ξ i , 2.7 u 1 T − u 2 T βB 0 u Δ 1 T − βB 0 u Δ 2 T m−2 i1 B u Δ 1 ξ i − B u Δ 2 ξ i . 2.8 6 Advances in Difference Equations According to Theorem A.5in37, 2.6 further yields φ p u Δ 1 t − φ p u Δ 2 t c, t ∈ 0,T T . 2.9 Hence, from 2.7 and 2.9, the assumption d 0 1 − m−2 i1 a i / 0, and the definition ofthep-Laplacian operator, it follows that u Δ 1 t − u Δ 2 t ≡ 0,t∈ 0,T T . 2.10 This equation, together with 2.8, further implies u 1 t ≡ u 2 t ,t∈ 0,σ T T , 2.11 which consequently leads tothe completion ofthe proof, that is, ut specified in 2.2 is the unique solution ofthe problems 2.1. Lemma 2.2. Assume that d 0 1 − m−2 i1 a i > 0 and that βb − m − 2b − μT 0.Ifg ∈ C ld 0,σT T , 0, ∞, then the unique solution ofthe problems 2.1 satisfies u t 0,t∈ 0,σ T T . 2.12 Proof. By 2.2 specified in Lemma 2.1,weget u Δ t −φ q t 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ 0,t∈ 0,T T . 2.13 Thus, ut is nonincreasing in the interval 0,σT T . In addition, notice that u σ T T σ T φ q s 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ Δs βB 0 φ q T 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ − m−2 i1 B φ q ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ Advances in Difference Equations 7 −μ T φ q T 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ βB 0 φ q T 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ − m−2 i1 B φ q ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ βb − m − 2 b − μ T φ q T 0 g τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 g τ ∇τ . 2.14 The last term in the above estimation is no less than zero because ofthe assumptions. Thus, from the monotonicity of ut,weget u t u σ T 0,t∈ 0,σ T T , 2.15 which completes the proof. Now, denote that E C ld 0,σT T and that u sup t∈0,σT T |ut|, where u ∈E. Thus, it is easy to verify that E endowed with ·becomes a Banach space. Furthermore, define a cone, denoted by P, through, P u ∈E|u t 0fort ∈ 0,σ T T , u Δ t 0fort ∈ 0,T T ,u Δ∇ t 0fort ∈ 0,σ T T . 2.16 Also, for a given positive real number r, define a function set P r by P r { u ∈P| u <r } . 2.17 Naturally, we denote that P r {u ∈P|u r} and that ∂P r {u ∈P|u r}.With these settings, we have the following properties. Lemma 2.3. If u ∈P, then i ut T − t/Tu for any t ∈ 0,T T , iiT − sut T − tus for any pair of s, t ∈ 0,T T with t s. 8 Advances in Difference Equations The proof of this lemma, which could be found in 26, 28, is directly from the specific construction ofthe set P. Next, let us construct a map A : P→Ethrough Au t T t φ q s 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f t, u τ ∇τ Δs βB 0 φ q T 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ − m−2 i1 B φ q ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ , 2.18 for any u ∈P. Then, through a standard argument 33, it is not hard to validate the following properties on this map. Lemma 2.4. Assume that the hypotheses H 1 –H 3 are all fulfilled. Then, AP ⊂P, and A : P r → P is completely continuous. 3. At Least Two PositiveSolutions in BoundaryValue Problems In this section, we aim to adopt the well-known Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem to prove theexistenceof at least two positivesolutions in theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10. Forthe sake of self-containment, we first state the Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem as follows. Theorem 3.1 see 34. Let P be a cone in a real Banach space E. For each d>0, set Pψ, d {x ∈P|ψx <d}.Letα and γbe increasing, nonnegative continuous functionals on P, and let θ be a nonnegative continuous functional on P with θ00 such that, for some c>0 and H>0, γ x θ x α x , x Hγ x , 3.1 for all x ∈ Pγ,c. Suppose that there exist a completely continuous operator A : Pγ,c →Pand three positive numbers 0 <a<b<csuch that θ λx λθ x , 0 λ 1,x∈ ∂P θ, b , 3.2 and i γAx >cfor all x ∈ ∂Pγ,c, ii θAx <bfor all x ∈ ∂Pθ, b, and iii Pα, a / ∅ and αAx >afor all x ∈ ∂Pα, a. Then, the operator A has at least two fixed points, denoted by x 1 and x 2 , belonging to Pγ,c and satisfying a<αx 1 with θx 1 <band b<θx 2 with γx 2 <c. Advances in Difference Equations 9 Now, set t min{t ∈ T | T/2 t T} and select t ∈ T satisfying 0 <t <t . Denote, respectively, that M T − t T t 0 φ q s 0 h τ ∇τ Δs, N T β b · φ q 1 d 0 T 0 h τ ∇τ , L T − t T T t φ q s t h τ ∇τ Δs, L 0 T − t βb − m − 2 b · φ q 1 d 0 T 0 h τ ∇τ . 3.3 Hence, we are in a position to obtain the following results. Theorem 3.2. Assume that the hypotheses H 1 –H 3 all hold and that there exist positive real numbers a, b, c such that 0 <a<b<c, a< L N b< L T − t TL c. 3.4 In addition, assume that f satisfies the following conditions: C 1 ft, u >φ p c/M for t ∈ 0,t T and u ∈ c, T/T − t c; C 2 ft, u <φ p b/N for t ∈ 0,T T and u ∈ 0, T/T − t b; C 3 ft, u >φ p a/L for t ∈ t ,T T and u ∈ 0,a. Then, theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 have at least two positivesolutions u 1 and u 2 such that a< max t∈t ,T T u 1 t with max t∈t ,T T u 1 t <b, b< max t∈t ,T T u 1 t with min t∈t ,t T u 2 t <c. 3.5 Proof. Construct the cone P and the operator A as specified in 2.16 and 2.18, respectively. In addition, define the increasing, nonnegative, and continuous functionals γ, θ,andα on P, respectively, by γ u min t∈t ,t T u t u t ,θ u max t∈t ,T T u t u t , α u max t∈t ,T T u t u t . 3.6 Evidently, γuθu αu for each u ∈P. 10 Advances in Difference Equations In addition, for each u ∈P, Lemma 2.3 manifests that γuut T − t /Tu. Thus, we have u T T − t γ u , 3.7 for each u ∈P. Also, notice that θλuλθu for λ ∈ 0, 1 and u ∈ ∂Pθ, b. Furthermore, from Lemma 2.4, it follows that the operator A : Pγ,c →Pis completely continuous. In what follows, we are to verify that all the conditions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied with respect tothe operator A. Let u ∈ ∂Pγ,c. Then, γumin t∈t ,t T utut c. This implies that ut c for t ∈ 0,t T , which, combined with 3.7, yields c u t T T − t c, 3.8 for t ∈ 0,t T . Because of assumption C 1 , ft, ut >φ p c/M for t ∈ 0,t T . According to thespecificformin2.18, Lemma 2.3, and the property Au ∈P,weobtainthat γ Au Au t T − t T Au T − t T Au 0 T − t T T 0 φ q s 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ Δs βB 0 φ q T 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ − m−2 i1 B φ q ξ i 0 f t, u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ T − t T T 0 φ q s 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ Δs βb − m − 2 b φ q T 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ 1 d 0 m−2 i1 a i ξ i 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ T − t T T 0 φ q s 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ Δs T − t T t 0 φ q s 0 h τ f τ,u τ ∇τ Δs [...]... with various boundaryvalue problems on time scales In addition, future directions for further generalization oftheboundaryvalue problem on time scales may include the generalization ofthep-Laplacian operator to increasing homeomorphism and homeomorphism, which has been investigated in 39 forthe nonlinear boundaryvalueof ordinary differential equations; the allowance ofthe function f to change... and time-scale-dependent sufficient conditions are established fortheexistenceof multiple positivesolutions in a specific kind ofboundaryvalue problems Advances in Difference Equations 19 on time scales This kind ofboundaryvalue problems not only includes the problems discussed in the literature but also is adapted to more general cases The well-known AveryHenderson fixed point theorem and the five... “Multiple positivesolutionsforp-Laplacian m-point boundaryvalue problems on time scales,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol 182, no 1, pp 478–491, 2006 23 H.-R Sun and W.-T Li, Existence theory forpositivesolutionsto one-dimensional p-Laplacianboundaryvalue problems on time scales,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol 240, no 2, pp 217– 248, 2007 24 Y.-H Su and W.-T Li, “Triple positive solutions. .. point theorem are adopted in the arguments It is valuable to mention that the writing form ofthe ending point ofthe interval on time scales should be accurately specified in dealing with different kind ofboundaryvalue conditions Any inaccurate expression may lead to a problematic or incomplete discussion Also it is noted that some other fixed point theorems and degree theories may be adapted to dealing... Indeed, the validity of condition iii in Theorem 3.1 is verified According to Theorem 3.1, we consequently approach the conclusion that theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 possess at least two positive solutions, denoted by u1 and u2 , satisfying a < α u1 with θ u1 < b and b < θ u2 with γ u2 < c, respectively 4 At Least Three PositiveSolutions in BoundaryValue Problems In this section, we are to prove... pages, 2003 20 J J DaCunha, J M Davis, and P K Singh, Existence results for singular three point boundaryvalue problems on time scales,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 295, no 2, pp 378–391, 2004 21 Z He, Existenceof two solutionsof m-point boundaryvalue problem for second order dynamic equations on time scales,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol 296, no... position to establish the following result on theexistenceof at least three solutions in theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 Theorem 4.2 Suppose that the hypotheses H1 – H3 are all fulfilled Assume that there exist positive real numbers a, b, c such that 0 < a < b < c, a< T −t T −t T −t b< c, T T2 Nb < Mc 4.3 Also assume that f satisfies the following conditions: C1 f t, u < φp c/N for t ∈ 0, T T and... solutionsof m-point BVPs forp-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol 69, no 11, pp 3811–3820, 2008 25 Z He, “Double positivesolutionsof three-point boundaryvalue problems forp-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 182, no 2, pp 304–315, 2005 26 Z He and L Li, “Multiple positive solutions. .. positivesolutionsforthe one-dimensional p-Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol 45, no 1-2, pp 68–79, 2007 ˙ 27 I Yaslan, “Multiple positivesolutionsfor nonlinear three-point boundaryvalue problems on time scales,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol 55, no 8, pp 1861–1869, 2008 ˙ 28 I Yaslan, Existenceofpositivesolutionsfor nonlinear... Problems In this section, we are to prove theexistenceof at least three positivesolutions in theboundaryvalue problems 1.9 and 1.10 by using the five functionals fixed point theorem which is attributed to Avery 35 Let γ, β, θ be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on P α and ψ are supposed to be nonnegative continuous concave functionals on P Thus, for nonnegative real numbers h, a, b, c, . Equations Volume 2010, Article ID 746106, 20 pages doi:10.1155/2010/746106 Research Article Time-Scale-Dependent Criteria for the Existence of Positive Solutions to p-Laplacian Multipoint Boundary Value Problem Wenyong. Equations 3 In the light of the five functionals fixed point theorem, they established the criteria for the existence of at least three solutions for the dynamic equation 1.1 either with conditions 1.4. configurations and with t he aid of the Avery-Henderson fixed point theorem 34, He established the criteria for the existence of at least two positive solutions in 1.1 fulfilling the boundary value conditions